David Guttmann-Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond - Wisdom and Spirit From Logotherapy (Social and Psychological Issues - Challenges and Solutions) - Praeger (2008) PDF
David Guttmann-Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond - Wisdom and Spirit From Logotherapy (Social and Psychological Issues - Challenges and Solutions) - Praeger (2008) PDF
David Guttmann-Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond - Wisdom and Spirit From Logotherapy (Social and Psychological Issues - Challenges and Solutions) - Praeger (2008) PDF
David Guttmann
Introduction xiii
Meaningful Living as a Central Challenge in Life xiii
The Question about the Meaning of Life xiv
Uniqueness of This Book xiv
My Way to Logotherapy xvi
2. Spiritual Development 13
Freedom of the Spirit as an Advantage in Aging 13
On Weakening of Bodily Strength and Lack of
Sensual Pleasures 14
The Best Defense against the Troubles of Old Age 15
Preparations for Old Age 16
3. The Search for Happiness 19
The Secret of Happiness 22
The Search for Happiness as a Search in Our Hearts 23
Living for Others as Happiness 24
4. Meaningful Living according to Logotherapy 27
Psychology of the Heights 28
What Is Logotherapy? 29
Freedom of the Will 30
The Influence of Alfred Adler on the Development of
Logotherapy 32
Jung's Approach to Meaning in Life 33
What Life Demands from Me: Meaning of the Moment 35
Supra-Meaning and Mental Health 36
5. Guiding Principles of Logotherapy 41
The First Principle: Freedom of Will 41
The Second Principle: The Defiant Power of the Human Spirit 42
The Third Principle: The Three Human Dimensions 43
The Fourth Principle: The Human Spirit Is the
Healthy Nucleus in Each Human Being 44
The Fifth Principle: Man Can Rise Above and Beyond Himself 44
The Sixth Principle: We Have the Capacity for
Self-Detachment 44
The Seventh Principle: We Live in the Present
and Should Look Forward to the Future 44
Contents ix
the scientist stands before a dilemma: Either he will write in a theoretical language
that is not open for laymen, or in a language that is popular yet superficial and
that could be understood by everybody. However, this is not necessarily so. The
obligation of the scientist is to write in such a way that both his colleagues and the
educated public could use it. This obligation is valid for our universal heritage in
literature, poetry, philosophy, and other treasures in the arts and sciences. I have
tried to surface many pearls of wisdom from all of these areas in the arts and sci-
ences about how to gain meaningful old age. My purpose was to offer a book that
would entertain and provide knowledge.
MY WAY TO LOGOTHERAPY
Life, according to the Nobel Prize winner writer Shmuel Joseph Agnon, is a
chain of meetings and departures. Each meeting contains many opportunities for
discovering meaning in life. In 1984 I had a fateful meeting in San Francisco with
Professor Viktor Frankl, my self-chosen spiritual mentor and since then beloved
friend. He has influenced me to devote my life to spreading his theory, logother-
apy, all over the world. Our wonderful friendship lasted until his death. This
friendship continues with his family to this day.
In our first meeting Frankl was eighty years old, yet judging by his energy,
enthusiasm, and youthful appearance, he could easily be mistaken for someone
who was twenty years younger. He was the epitome of his theory. He was wise,
witty, and above all had a sense of humor that enchanted me. Many years prior to
our meeting I read his book Man’s Search for Meaning, and I have used this impor-
tant book in teaching a course titled Human Behavior in the Social Environment.
This book had a deep impact on me and over ten million people who have read
it, and I wanted to meet its author. When we met, I felt that I was standing before
a unique personality, someone who could serve as a model for successful aging.
Frankl has been my guiding light for meaningful living in old age ever since.
Part One
Theoretical and
Philosophical Approaches
to Meaningful Living
This page intentionally left blank
1
Gerontology is an area of scientific study of the aging process; a subject for teach-
ing at various levels in higher education and informal settings; a professional work
with individuals, groups, and communities; and the study of inter-generational
relationships between old and young in a given social, cultural, and emotional
environment.
As a relatively young science that has been developed especially within the past
four decades, gerontology intends to understand, help, and prevent problems
related to aging. Additional goals and objectives of gerontology are furthering the
health and welfare of the aged population, explicating the needs of the aged, and
offering ways to prepare for old age while in the middle of life.
Aging is an individual experience that each human being will experience if they
are fortunate enough to live a long life. In the industrially developed countries of
the world the majority of people enjoy an average longevity of eighty years. This
length of life was unheard of in earlier centuries. Even in the first half of the twentieth
century few people were fortunate to live this long. Despite this amazing longevity
of life, many people among the aging population are still not psychologically and
spiritually prepared for this period of life and negatively perceive old age without
realizing the value of the gift they received from life.
The question is when do we realize that we have arrived at old age? To be an
old man or woman is not a big deal. It is much more difficult to remain young in
old age. In western countries millions of people try to remain young by means of
cosmetics, plastic surgery, diets, and other artificial devices. However, as soon as
one wipes off the cosmetics from one’s face, looks into the mirror, and sees reality,
one begins to tremble because behind the youthful appearance hides a figure that
resembles more and more the picture of Dorian Gray.
People dependent on public opinion are willing to use anything to maintain
the illusion of youth. They reject aging as a natural phase of life and fight against
3
4 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
it unsuccessfully. They fight reason, logic, and biology. If they were more coura-
geous and could say “I am old”, they could get rid of their torment once and for
all. Alas, they lack the power to say such words. We can, of course, understand
them because in those countries to be old means being weak, useless, nonmain-
stream, and meaningless.
In a story by the French writer Guy de Maupassant (1850–93), a fifty-year-old
man dresses and behaves as if he were thirty. During a dinner the hostess intro-
duces her daughter, an attractive virgin fresh out of the monastery, to him. This
gentleman succeeds in seducing this girl and takes her to his home. On the way to
his bedroom, he looks at himself in the mirror, and the magic of the moment
vanishes at once. He sees himself as he really is; a man with dull gray hair, deep
black rings under his eyes, a bulging stomach and bent back, and he says to
himself, “You are a has been, my dear.” Now he is ready to forego the sought after
pleasure and escorts the girl back to her home unharmed.
Many other people accept their old age with pride. Throughout history we see
figures such as Plato, Voltaire, Goethe, Freud, Shaw, and Viktor Frankl, who in their
old age performed great artistic and intellectual deeds and have achieved lasting
fame. They should serve as models of successful aging for the young generations.
respondents, “The day is today! Dream if you wish, but do something to make
your dream come true! The day is today!”
The following story about Abe (a fictitious name as all other names used in
case illustration in this book from now on) is an example:
Abe, a man in his early sixties, came to me because he wanted treatment for the
emptiness that had come over him in the past few years. He told me that he had
been treated by various therapists and methods, including Chinese acupuncture,
without success. He was still waiting for something that would bring an end to his
suffering. He asked me suspiciously what method I used in my therapy; whether
I used psychoanalysis or behavior therapy. I smiled in return because I remem-
bered a story about Frankl. He had once been asked by a lecture participant to
explain in one sentence the difference between psychoanalysis and logotherapy.
Frankl said that he could do it, but first he wanted that person to explain to him
in one sentence the meaning of psychoanalysis. This participant said, “In psycho-
analysis the patient lies on a couch with the therapist behind his head, who must
hear at times many unpleasant things about the patient.” Frankl replied, “In
logotherapy the patient may remain sitting erect but he must hear things which
sometimes are very disagreeable to hear” (Frankl, 1962, pp. 95–96).
I said to Abe, “I use my own method.” He seemed perplexed and asked, “You
have no other method?” “No,” I said. “I try to adapt myself to the special needs of
the client. There are many methods in psychotherapy, but you can’t help one with
methods alone. But if you insist on a method then I tell you that I use logother-
apy.” I proceeded to briefly tell him the meaning of logotherapy. I said that in my
thirty years of practice I had learned to find my unique way and to understand the
client’s language and world of concepts because only then could I help someone
else find their unique way in life.
“Yes,” he said. “I heard something about Frankl and the concentration camps.
That’s ok with me.” He seemed relaxed and told me that despite his relatively good
physical, social, and economic condition, he felt that something was missing in his
life and could not find meaning and sense to his existence. He had circled the
globe twice and worked as a volunteer in various organizations, but he could not
find peace of mind. Something was missing and bothering him a great deal. I
recalled a story by the Israeli writer Agnon about an old tailor that had to make a
garment for the Lord. The garment was almost ready, but something was still
missing. “That something if it exists,” Agnon wrote, “then the garment is whole,
and if it is missing, then the garment is not whole.” That “something” means the
accomplishment of the whole; because only the whole gives meaning to what man
is seeking in his life.
The “something” that Abe was searching for was the meaning of his life. The
lack of this “something” is what made his life empty and miserable. He felt that
he was living in an existential vacuum without a clear purpose and goal. I told Abe
that I could help him if he was willing to work hard and make some sacrifices.
“What is it?” he asked. “What you feel is really important for you,” I said. He was
disappointed. “I thought that you would give me something else, perhaps some
6 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
advice.” “I don’t have such things,” I said. “In logotherapy we don’t believe in the
concept of instant therapy. There are no shortcuts. Man must work hard on
himself to gain the necessary change. Logotherapy,” I said to Abe, “is based on
choice and responsibility, and these belong first of all to the client. The therapist
can only help. He cannot make a decision instead of the client, for the client is the
one who carries the responsibility for his choices and for his fate. If you want to
live a meaningful life now, instead of living in the past, you must make an effort.
First you should think about what activity is the most meaningful for you. After
you invested your energy and soul in this effort, and made your discovery, then
you are free to discuss the ways how to achieve your goal.” Abe replied, “Do you
mean that I have to change my habits; for example, to forego getting up late in the
morning and spending hours in a café and many other things like these?” “It
depends on you,” I said. “You don’t have to change a thing if you don’t want to.
You may stay in your misery and feeling of emptiness.” “Good,” he said. “I will
consider your words. What do I owe you for this session?” “You don’t owe me a
thing,” I said. “You owe only to yourself.”
MEANINGFUL LIVING
What is meaningful living in the second half of life? How can we attain it?
Can it be achieved by anybody or only by those with special qualities? Can we
teach ourselves and others how to attain it? These questions are not at all new
and original. They have existed since the dawn of human history and have occu-
pied the thoughts of almost everybody, particularly philosophers, writers, and
poets. These questions usually become stressful when it is rather late, when peo-
ple are deep into old age. They are tied to the concept of the good life and
human happiness.
Living a good life has always been the expressed wish of all people. Each of us
has a vague idea of an overall goal in our lives. This goal was expressed by the
ancient Greeks from the times of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, and up to the times
of the Roman philosophers in the ancient Greek concept of eudaimonia, which is
usually defined as happiness. This is the aim of all human pursuits, or the highest
goal that a person can achieve by his or her actions, even in old age.
This idea was particularly well expressed by the famous Roman philosopher of
antiquity, Marcus Tulius Cicero, in his delightful little book titled De Senectude or
On Old Age (1909), which he wrote in 45 BCE. Cicero elected to present his philo-
sophical attitude to meaningful living in old age through Marcus Porcius Cato, a
character he took from Roman history. Marcus Porcius Cato, “the Elder” and
Roman Senator, became famous in history for his oratorical skills. He used to end
each of his speeches in the Roman Senate with the words “And Carthage must be
destroyed.”
According to Cicero, Cato lived for eighty-four years, an unusually long life in
those days. Until his death he retained all his physical and mental powers, and did
not think about his impending death. Thus he became a role model for the youth
On Old Age That Steals on Us Fast 7
in Rome and continues to serve as such for the aged of today, especially for those
who are afraid of the nuisance of old age and death.
Similar opinions about old age and the shortness of life were held by the
Roman philosopher Lucius Annaeus Seneca, perhaps the greatest among the
Stoics. He was born in 4 BCE. and died in 65 CE. Seneca was commanded to
commit suicide by Emperor Nero on a false charge. He had a difficult life full of
disasters and losses, but he never succumbed to the twists and turns of his fortune.
He kept his stoic attitude toward life (of which more will be said later) until his
last moment, saying, “Never did I trust Fortune (the goddess), even when she
seemed to be offering peace. All those blessings which she kindly bestowed on
me—money, public office, influence—I relegated to a place from which she could
take them back without disturbing me” (Botton, 2000, p. 99).
power and similar earthly goals, look and see how desperately they wish to
lengthen their lives. Many such people try to cheat time by all kinds of lies and
harmful behaviors and cling to an illusionary image of youth as if it were possible
to cheat time. They wail that they did not live long enough because they did not
have the time to accomplish their dreams or enjoy the fruits of their efforts. But
those who were wise to keep watch on the passing of time and did not waste it are
not afraid of the finality of life. They march calmly toward the finish. The life of
the wise is long in terms of time because he can live hundreds of years in literary,
philosophical, scientific, and religious creations. He is not limited as those people
who always chase after honor, power, success, and riches. The wise can always
meet good friends who have passed long ago through the great works they left
behind. The wise can always engage in discussions with these people and enjoy
their wisdom. These discussions and wisdom give the wise pleasure that is much
greater in value than all those material and earthly matters.
Father Goriot in his hurt and despair left his business and went to live in that
poor neighborhood in Paris. He gradually lost his fortune, and he even sold his
last pieces of value to help his daughters pay for the losses of their husbands.
When he became gravely ill, he asked to see his daughters. One of the heroes in
the book, who lived in the same hotel, was sent to call the daughters to see their
father before his death, but they shamelessly refused to see him.
These two masterpieces deal with intergenerational relationships. Despite the
historical distance between these two great writers—Shakespeare lived from 1564
to 1616 and Balzac from 1799 to 1850—it seems as if the generations continue to
behave in the same way. Children rob their parents and exploit the fact that old
folks are willing to pay any price for the right to love them. Although King Lear in
Shakespeare’s story finally receives real love from one of his daughters, the father
in Balzac’s story, who sacrificed his entire wealth in order to make his daughters
happy, is treated ruthlessly. Balzac’s story comes to an inhuman climax when the
daughters refuse to listen to the plea of the man sent by their father to come to his
deathbed and do not participate in his funeral.
Today we witness the cynical exploitation of many old people, especially those
who in their naivety behave as King Lear or Father Goriot. Despite the progress
made in some welfare states in caring for the rights and well-being of old people,
the family remains the most important informal support system for the old.
Congress can make no laws about kindness, love, dignity, and honor for old folks.
It cannot demand or command society to give emotional support and care to its
aged members. Beyond the care of family, each person who has not reached the
second half of life must make preparations for his or her old age in order to live
comfortably and in security when the time comes. This is possible if the young
understand that they have to save for the hard times, which include paying insur-
ance fees for health care in the future and ensuring their rights to decent care in a
nursing home.
old man and threaten to devour him. The king is left defenseless against these
forces. He is too weak to defend himself. Old age is too burdensome and the lion
is about to swallow him. This is why he gives that blessing to his saviors.
What bothers today’s aged more than the length of life is the lack of respect for
the aged by younger generations in many parts of the world. In the industrialized
societies in particular, and even in the developing countries, the position of the
old has deteriorated, and they are no longer perceived as the wise men or women
in society. In earlier times respect for the old was regulated by religious and moral
needs, as in the Fifth Commandment in the Bible. Even in the society of the
ancient Hebrews that commandment entailed a reward, long life for those who
fulfilled it, meaning that people had to be induced to adhere to this precept.
The respect accorded the old was based on the recognition that they possessed
life experience and knowledge that was superior to that of the young. The respect
was also based on the need for the old in certain occupations, such as arts and crafts,
matters of family life, and in educating and advising the young. Today these func-
tions are no longer necessary in our highly technological societies, and such knowl-
edge is no longer recognized as a prized possession of the old. On the contrary, they
have difficulty in keeping up with the rapid development in every field of science
and technology, especially in electronics and computer-based technologies.
What bothers the aged in particular is connected to the devaluation of former
traditions and norms. To be young, healthy, beautiful, and possibly rich, was most
likely a human quest even in traditional societies, but today youth is overvalued.
Consequently, many old people feel themselves unneeded and valueless in society.
They have lost what can never be replaced: their youth and vitality. Many old peo-
ple try desperately to cling to their lost youth by dieting religiously, exercising, and
applying cosmetics. Many old people fail to accept the fact that time has passed
and the future awaiting them is getting exceedingly short and frightening. There-
fore each old person must decide how to spend their remaining years: whether in
self-deception and in a compulsive holding on to what used to be, even when this
feels impossible, or in accepting the inevitable, the coming losses and weaknesses,
but also the new possibilities that are still open for finding meaning in life.
Many old people forget that they are first of all spiritual beings whose happiness
and real wealth is measured in spiritual, emotional, and intellectual gains. The soul
is the central factor in the life of each old person because the soul never ages.
Although the body ages and declines, the soul remains young and continues to
develop. True success in life is measured by spiritual yardsticks. Such success means
giving to others, loving, sharing, and finding deeper meaning in everything we do.
doing. The second reason is that it weakens the body. The third reason is that it
deprives us from enjoying all the bodily pleasures; and the fourth reason is that it
is close to death.
It is interesting to note that in the past 2,000 years or more no real changes have
occurred in the perception of aging as the most difficult and troublesome of the
eight phases of life (Erikson, 1964; 1968). In 1975 the first survey about the
attitudes of Americans to old age was published by the Gallup Poll. Its title was
The Myths and Reality of Aging in America. Of the 4,254 respondents only two per-
cent chose the sixties and seventies in a person’s life as the best years, and one-
third of the respondents claimed that these are the worst years for them.
As for the first reason why aging is troublesome, Cicero noted that those who
deny the opportunities of the aged to do something great do not contribute much
to clarifying this question. They resemble those who claim that the captain of the
ship makes no contribution to its sailing. While the sailors are busy in all kinds of
maintenance work that is necessary for sailing, the captain sits calmly and holds
the steering wheel or helm. Although the captain is not doing physical work, his
role is much more difficult and important than the role of the crew because he is
guiding the ship and is responsible for its course and purpose.
Among the virtues that are characteristic of old age is mental tranquility. Many
people and most philosophers perceive this as the greatest virtue of old age. The
wisdom, steadiness of character, and right judgment that Cicero speaks about
through Cato, are the actual and realistic expressions of that tranquility. It enables
the old to have more patience toward themselves and others and to accept people
as they are. This does not mean, however, that we must accept every bit of non-
sense and show weakness in our old age. It means a correct judgment of what is
and what is not possible to do or to gain. When people approach reality calmly,
they usually become more evenhanded and objective.
Seneca saw similar traits in calmness and mental tranquility and emphasized
that these are particularly important in old age. According to Seneca, lack of calm-
ness, inability to concentrate on one thing or on one activity, and the need for
constant changes are due to a lack of satisfaction with one’s self. He advised his
friend Serenus that to combat his inability to relax he must trust himself and work
because nothing is more dangerous to a person than idleness.
Another virtue available to the old is a person’s ability to love somebody. This love
requires less selfishness and the ability to not take ourselves too seriously. We could
also add that we should be grateful for the life we have already had, for the life that is
perhaps ahead of us, and for everything we have received. We must learn to relinquish
many things so that the greatest renunciation, life itself, will not surprise us.
understanding and love because we know that it is inevitable. Two other virtues
in old age are modesty and lack of demands. If these two virtues are developed,
the old person will be respected because instead of getting into arguments about
what is lost and why, one can concentrate on giving something meaningful to
oneself and to society.
As we age, we must learn to thank life not only for what it gave us so far but
also for what is in store for us in the future. Gratefulness warms the heart and
opens the door to a good feeling. We should be grateful for all the memories and
for memory itself that is able to raise pictures and scenes from the past. These can
flood one’s soul with feelings of happiness.
This attitude to life was echoed some 1,800 years later by Schopenhauer. He
was a philosopher who said that we must repeat what we have learned, reflect on
the past, and raise it repeatedly to prevent its sinking into the depths of forgetful-
ness (Schopenhauer, 2001, p. 209).
When one reaches old age, one should take an inventory of his life. An old
person should do a great cleaning job, preferably once a year, to get rid of all the
superfluous junk that has accumulated so far, such as all the envy, desires for
power and control, arrogance, conceit, hatred, and childish attitudes. This is the
right time to say good-bye to all the excess baggage. Many times people say,
“We can’t take it along in the after life,” but, as the saying goes, there is a great
distance between what is said and what is done. Saying good-bye to this excess
baggage permits one to live one’s life with meaning. It enables one to choose what
is meaningful over what is no longer needed. Beginning with the second half of
life, we must learn to voluntarily leave behind objects, social status, and roles.
After age fifty one should heed the following advice: it is far better to enjoy and
be happy with what one has achieved by his or her own effort than to poison one’s
soul and life by lamenting over what one will never get. The maturity of a fifty-
year-old is being able to see the world as it is, in a new way and a new light—
instead of the fog that has engulfed one’s vision because of envy, yearnings, fears,
and obligations. Thus one can learn an age-old truth: by being capable of
renouncing everything, we will get everything (Nagy, 2000).
2
Spiritual Development
13
14 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
When a person approaches old age, he or she should get rid of the illusions that
were an integral part of the younger years. This act is painful but necessary. It is hard
to say to ourselves that we were wrong, that we made mistakes. We must realize what
is beyond our strength. This learning is the last opportunity to get rid of all kinds of
disappointments, envy, and hatred. When old people free their heart from these
destructive elements, they can achieve a higher level of existence. Then they can look
upon the world as it is, without envy, without sadness, without prejudice, and enjoy
it to the fullest—despite its many shortcomings. Old people should learn to smile at
life from the depth of their souls as a testimony to their inner peace.
The life of the great artist Pablo Picasso (1881–1973) can serve as an
illustration to what has been said above. He lived ninety-two years, and during his
long life he went through many changes that enhanced and enriched his art: as a
young student he painted in the classical style of the great artists from the
sixteenth century. In the beginning of the twentieth century he lived his “blue
period” and afterward his “pink period.”
In the 1920s Picasso was active in the cubist movement, and when the Fascists
and Nazis came to power in Italy and Germany he began to paint in surrealistic
and expressionistic styles. His fame and fortune grew with his aging. A testimony
to his many talents can be found at his birthplace in Spain in the museum that
houses his artistic creations.
Not every aging person is an artist, a writer, or a politician whose life can serve
as a model for others. Ordinary people can also lead satisfying and rich lives if
they keep an open mind and adopt practical wisdom.
As we age, we need to learn how to refrain from taking unnecessary risks. Each
task or role offered to an aged person requires careful thought about the positives and
negatives involved. Wise old people, for example, do not wait until their eyesight is so
weak that they cannot see road signs or until their reflexes are so slow that they
cannot respond quickly to sudden changes in traffic in order to refrain from driving.
The wise person listens to good advice, takes into consideration the feelings of
others, such as the feelings of his family and kin, accepts and understands that he
or she cannot remain young and independent forever, and is willing to live with
the limitations that time and environment expect from him or her. The wise
person does not try to escape into illusions. The noted psychologist Carl Gustav
Jung, in Memories, Dreams, and Thoughts (1997), wrote about his old age in the
following way: “I am satisfied with the way my life was structured. It was rich, and
I gained a lot. How could I think that I would get so much? Everything that
happened was things that I could not foretell” (p. 450).
have in whatever they do with all their might. Old people can remain active and
nobody will prevent them from continuing to exercise their powers of intellect
even in extreme old age. They still have enough strength to teach the young, to
train and equip them for the duties of life.
Failure of the body’s strength, Cato tells the young, is more often caused by the
vices of youth than those of old age. A dissolute and intemperate youth hands
down the body to old age in a worn-out state. Cato advises the young to enjoy
their bodily strength when they have it, and when it is gone they should not wish
it back. It is important to stand up to old age and compensate for its drawbacks
by making an effort. We must fight it as we should an illness, for our bodies are
like lamps: unless you feed them with oil, they too go out from old age. “The body
is apt to get gross from exercise; but the intellect becomes nimbler by exercising
itself ” (Cicero, 1909, pp. 56–58).
Is it true that old age lacks all sensual pleasures? Cato replies that not only the
body but also the intellect must be supported. Old people can have lots of pleasure
from modest festivities, pleasant discussions and conversations with friends, and
drinking and eating together with people of all ages, but these activities must be
done in modesty and with restraint.
Cato prefers the intellectual pleasures to the physical or bodily pleasures as
being more appropriate for the elderly. He praises in particular the pleasures of
the farmer, which are not marred by any degree of old age because they deal
with the earth and its productiveness, the planting and growing of vines. The
production, cultivation, and growth process of grains, vines, vegetables,
flowers, and fruits that grow in the garden or in the orchard can be observed
and controlled to a certain degree, and can give more pleasure than all bodily
enjoyments combined. These pleasures are available to many old people even
today.
Cato emphasizes that neither white hairs nor wrinkles can at once claim
influence in themselves; it is the honorable conduct of earlier days that is
rewarded by possessing influence in the last days (Cicero, 1909, p. 69). Both old
and young people today should take this advice to heart. There are aged people
who get fretful, ill tempered, disagreeable, and avaricious. Cato stresses the point
that these behaviors are the faults of character, not of the time of life, meaning
old age. These faults are often the result of neglect, lack of respect, and the
mocking of the old by the young. However, they can be softened by good
character and good education.
The words of Cicero, via Cato, with all their beauty of speech, richness of
expression, poetic and literary strength, and wisdom, do not suffice for old people
living in the modern world to know how to prepare themselves for their old age.
They need knowledge drawn not only from philosophy but also from many other
areas of life. They need knowledge that science and technology can provide them.
But they also need knowledge beyond what is known and has been proven scien-
tifically in the modern age. They need knowledge about the mystic of existence.
A virtuous life, according to Cato, is only part of the best defense against the
troubles of old age. There are many factors in addition to moral virtues that
presently make life more tolerable in old age. Chief among these factors is the
machinery at home and outside that helps old people in their washing, eating,
mobility, housework, and so on, thus making life relatively easy for most old
people and accounting, in part, for increased longevity.
Advances in medicine and pharmacology to fight diseases and ailments
associated with aging and the availability of knowledge about sanitation, hygiene,
nutrition, physical exercise, sports, and use of leisure time, all contribute to the
well-being, comfort, and ease of a growing number of old people, especially in the
industrialized parts of the world.
Today there are many opportunities for old people to remain active,
productive, and useful to society long after retirement, whether as paid workers or
as volunteers. Old age subsidies and benefits given by the social security
administrations of many countries now make the burden of living easier for more
millions of old people than in any other historical era, even if there is a long way
to go before a dignified old age will be assured for all.
relatively easy thing to do if one begins it in the young adult years. These
preparations generally include savings and insurance plans, and indemnities
against illnesses, accidents, disabilities, and loss of life. There are others who
maintain regular annual check-ups, eat healthy foods, refrain from smoking and
from addictive or dangerous substances, exercise and engage in sports regularly,
and think that they are making all the necessary preparations for their old age.
Although all the above preparations for old age are important and good, they
are insufficient in themselves to provide a meaningful old age. If we do not make
preparations for the time of the empty nest when the children are grown up and
live away from home, we may pay a heavy price. The freedom that is sought after
eagerly and suddenly arrives and is accompanied by an uninvited guest—the fear
of emptiness. What previously gave sense and purpose to life has left. The routine
order of daily life people were used to for decades has disappeared, and they are
left with many empty hours.
There are aging people who sink into self-pity and reproach themselves, saying
things such as “If I only were wiser” or “if I only did” so and so. And many others
fall into depression or despair. Still others escape into passivity, become addicted
to the television, refrain from mental activity, and accept their fates as a matter of
fact. People whose lives centered only on daily routines, and who made no effort
to combat this monotony or to go out into the wider world with its abundance of
opportunities will find it difficult to make the necessary changes. They may
erroneously think that it is already too late, and then they may find themselves
succumbing to the inevitable. These are, alas, wrong and unhealthy ways of
behaving that attest to a lack of preparation for their old age.
Each life event that happens without preparations hurts a lot. Whoever is
caught by life unready risks negative results that could drive one to depression.
Sometimes old age literally pounces upon a man, as it did upon Abraham in the
Bible when he lost his wife and therefore his shield against old age.
When one reaches fifty, if not much earlier, one should begin to make
necessary preparations for one’s old age in three dimensions—physical,
psychological, and spiritual, in its religious and secular sense—so that aging will
not pounce upon one unprepared. This is the right time to begin imagining how
one would like to arrive at old age.
Erik Erikson (1964), a disciple of Sigmund Freud, has remarked that life is built
on “holding on” and “letting go.” At each phase of human development we must
learn what to hold on to and what to let go of and how. If one continues to hold
on to things that one was supposed to let go of, continues to hold on to what is no
longer relevant, and cannot renounce it, then one will not be able to accept his or
her aging and fill it with life-satisfying content.
Before a person enters old age, it behooves him or her to learn which doors are
still open and which doors are forever closed. For a young person it is almost
impossible to imagine his or her old age. It is even more difficult for the young to
make preparations for their old age at that time in their lives. Even students
studying gerontology can hardly imagine themselves as old people. They resemble
18 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
old participants in many studies who deny the fact that they are aged and insist
that the others in the same age group are old.
An aging individual must learn what promotes his or her health and what
poses great risks that need to be avoided. An appropriate diet and exercise can do
wonders to preserve and even to enhance one’s physical and mental well-being.
Above all, older people must learn how to use their spiritual powers to gain
successful old age. They must learn how to refrain from complaining and how to
overcome frustrations that come inevitably with aging. An old man or woman
should not become a nuisance to his or her social environment.
The following story illustrates this maxim. A man was invited to a party. He
asked his wife to take his mother to a nearby café and to treat her to a light lunch.
When he came back to the café, he asked his mother how she enjoyed the time
with her daughter-in-law. The old lady said in a whiny voice, “I had a good time.
I got a cup of coffee.” The daughter-in-law became red in her face and asked, “And
didn’t you get anything else?” The old lady replied, still whining, “Yes, I also got a
piece of cake.” “And nothing else?” “I also had a roll with honey and butter.” “Did
you also get good cheese?” “Yes,” said the old lady with a sigh. “And did you forget
the fruits you got?”“Yes,” said the old lady with a choking voice. “There were fruits
too” (Nagy, 2000, p. 79).
Of course, not all old people behave this way, but they can become irritating,
annoying, and ungrateful if they have not learned to be thankful for all the
kindness bestowed on them. They need to defend themselves against the
vicissitudes of life physically and mentally and to refrain from complaining
unjustly.
The best and safest ways to prepare ourselves for old age begin in the early
twenties of our life. Albert Schweitzer, the famous physician and winner of the
Nobel Prize for peace, summarized this preparation in his book Honor of Life
(1999). He wrote that his faith taught him to struggle and remain young in spirit,
to refrain from being a “mature person” (meaning an old man) even in his old age
(p. 235). Schweitzer reminds old and young people that life wishes to take away
from us our belief in the good and the beautiful, in what is true. Life wants to rob
us of our enthusiasm. But we must not throw away our ideals. True knowledge is
in the power to rise above and beyond the disappointments.
“What is the greatest secret in life?” ask many old people today. Schweitzer
replies that the greatest secret is to go through life without wearing out. One has
to reflect about all the events that have happened and look forward in order to
accomplish this feat (p. 236).
3
The Dalai Lama (2001) has stated in his book on happiness that we all wish for
something better in life, irrespective whether or not we have religious belief.
Therefore the purpose of life is the search after happiness (p. 19).
The struggle to be happy, to enjoy lasting and fulfilling happiness in old age, seems
to be never ending. We can differentiate among three kinds of struggle: nonvoluntary,
partially voluntary, and positive. Of these, only positive struggle merits real attention,
because it is a struggle that provides self-respect and compensates for depression,
disappointment, loneliness, and illness.
Happiness is whatever confers well-being and good spirits. The attitudes that
are the most likely to ensure happiness in later life are flexibility, self-respect,
perseverance in a personal project, and knowledge of the difference between
illness and aging. There are two kinds of happiness: short-term or instant, and
long-lasting and fulfilling. Older people who developed a healthy attitude to
positive struggle early in their lives and maintained it during their long lives, enjoy
the latter (Gullan-Whur, 2002).
The problem with this approach to happiness is that not every older person is
able to develop the necessary strength to engage in a positive struggle for happi-
ness. Many people do not know what issues or situations in life are worthwhile to
struggle for or what purpose is best for them to invest their waning energies in.
Many people resign themselves to the less than happy circumstances of their lives.
Moreover, each individual must find his or her own struggle that best promotes
survival and happiness. What is important, therefore, is to let people accept that
change is always possible; that they do not need to follow their life-long habits; that
earlier attitudes to life, creativity, and happiness do not necessarily remain static,
even in old age. Thus there is first a need to promote positive self-respect, by using
talents and capacities in a socially accepted way, especially in the service of a great
idea, and then to engage in the struggle for their fulfillment. This kind of struggle
19
20 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
leads to the discovery of one’s real self, the experience of symbolic growth, which,
in logotherapy, is equated with peak feelings experienced during life events that are
decisive for spiritual well-being and personal growth. What really matters in such
a struggle is the impact on significant others and on the world.
Ignoring the symptoms of illness as long as they are not life-threatening,
concentrating on new and rewarding activities, and denying age are other ways of
maintaining a healthy and positive struggle for survival in old age. The German
poet and philosopher Wolfgang Goethe wrote the second part of Faust while he
was seriously ill and in old age. He did not give up the struggle to finish his mas-
terpiece; he refused to succumb to the illness and continued to create and work
until the very end of his life. Thus he turned a human predicament into a great
human victory.
Albert Ellis (1998), founder of Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy and the
grandfather of cognitive-behavior therapy, wrote Optimal Aging: Get over Getting
Older when he was in his eighties. This work is a useful, witty, and valuable self-help
manual for people, not necessarily only the old, who wish to lead meaningful and
happy lives in their old age. Ellis developed twenty rules for optimal living in the
twenty-first century (p. 271). He used Sigmund Freud’s saying that the goal of all life
is death but paraphrased it as the goal of all life is to have a ball. His book tells old
people to concentrate on positive ways to create enjoyment in the second half of life.
A practical approach to optimal living is not enough for a happy life in old age.
Many of the rules presented by Ellis and co-author Velten sound too idealistic and
even somewhat preachy. A more balanced attitude to human happiness is given by
philosophy.
Human happiness has constituted a philosophical problem ever since
philosophy came into being. Each of the leading philosophers in the past
4,000 years of written human history had his or her own version and definition of
this elusive concept. In antiquity, for example, the Greek philosopher Epicurus
(342–271 BCE) equated happiness and joy with ethics. He said that each living
creature tries to gain happiness, joy, and pleasure and to avoid pain. Someone who
is able to nullify both bodily and mental pain has arrived at the happiness that is
sought after by humans. Happiness oriented toward truth and justice can be
attained, especially by the wise.
The great Roman philosopher Seneca (4 BC–60 AD) claimed that being
dissatisfied with what one has will cause a person to remain miserable, even if he
or she rules the whole world. Only the wise are happy with their lot, and every fool
despises himself or herself. He also said that people ask for happiness throughout
all their lives, yet few of them know the nature of this happiness and even less how
to gain it. According to Seneca, the source of happiness is mental tranquility,
which immunizes people against the upheavals of fate; this happiness is what the
wise person senses when he or she lives in accordance with good virtues and
morals (Seneca, 1997, p. 13).
Aurelius Augustinus (354–430 AD), who lived during the end of antiquity and
is regarded by scholars of the Church as one of its philosophical founders, relied
The Search for Happiness 21
on ancient Greek philosophy to pave the way for the philosophy of the Middle
Ages. His attitude to happiness was based on the belief that the way to happiness
leads one to turn inside. The inner world consists of knowledge, understanding,
and will—combined into one unit—as in the three sacred elements of
Christianity. The truth dwells inside people and not outside them, Augustinus
maintained. His ethics were based on the concept of love, which he equated with
happiness. This happiness was not built on earthly riches, goods, and possessions
but on love itself, on true love, on the love of God.
In the modern ages happiness was defined differently by philosophers and by
religious leaders. John Stuart Mill (1806–73) was one of the leading utilitarian
thinkers of his times. He defined the aim of a utilitarian attitude to life as the
greatest possible happiness for the greatest possible number of people. He also
thought that, as each human being is seeking personal happiness, so should each
realize that personal happiness and welfare are dependent on the happiness of all
others. An act is ethical if it results in advancing happiness and reducing pain and
suffering. One needs to weigh not only the quantity of happiness created by the
act, but its quality as well.
Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900), a great philosopher in the nineteenth
century, related to happiness from an altogether different angle when he asked
whether or not the final aim of science is the greatest measure of happiness and
the minimum of sorrow. The answer given was that modern science can rob
people of happiness and turn them into cold creatures. He believed that, one day,
science would discover its ability to bring happiness. Then and only then would
the stars shine even more (Nietzsche, 1997, pp. 53–54).
It is common to think that everybody wants to be happy, and everybody wishes
to live a long life full of happiness. The proof of this statement is evident: at each
birthday party, people are greeted with wishes such as “lots of happiness” and
“may you live 120 years”—like Moses in the Bible—as though people could live
life in a static situation of constant happiness.
The need for eternal happiness has its roots in early childhood, when the little
child lives without responsibility, without differentiating between good and bad,
without a sense of time. The small child does not know anything yet about life’s
temporality or about death, and thus life seems eternal. Bliss in early childhood—
life without worry or much pain, life full of pleasure and joy—is perceived by
many people in their maturity as their hearts’ desire.
What is this happiness that people crave so much? Is it self-evident? Or is
there perhaps some effort needed to reach it? Is it possible to gain it as a gift from
fate? What is it made of? Is it control of others, or getting rich? Or is it dependent
on living a modest life, yet with a sense of satisfaction with ourselves and with
the world?
The Danish philosopher Søren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813–55) said that the
door to happiness opens from inside out. When people try to force their way
through it and to be happy by using all means, they only close the way to this door
(1993, p. 64).
22 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
historical time in which many people are mistaken and confuse healthy and
constructive self-actualization with limitless egoism. Many people are addicted to
materialism, an addiction that cannot ever be satisfied, and they live inside the
illusion that material riches will give them happiness.
Many people perceive love in its narrow definition, as the satisfaction of their
immediate sexual urges and drives. But—when people free themselves of the need
to acquire more material resources, honors, social standing, and power that provide
them with a sense of superiority over others and when they do not invest all of their
mental energies in achieving fame and wealth but instead in attaining meaningful
living and enrichment of their souls—they can get on the king’s road that leads to
both self-actualization and to love. But a precondition of the search for true happi-
ness is that the search must begin in our hearts, in our souls, in our inner world.
not coming via thunder that endangers their lives. It is, rather, a quiet voice that is
easy to drown (Buber, 1976, p. 12).
The search in one’s heart is effective only when it leads to Buber’s road to
change; otherwise, it turns into something tasteless that only leads to self-torture,
despair, and entanglement with the negative forces in human beings. To find this
road, one needs to be ready to accept change and to turn away from the way
already trodden. The trembling of the heart that Buber speaks about is equal for
all who have faced the essential question of being in the world. For whose hearts
will not tremble when they must struggle with the fact that their life may come to
its end in an instant—even if they outwardly behave heroically, such as the
warden in the story?
what has been gained graciously. These people may be characterized as living
empty lives, without meaningful content.
Happiness is close to unhappiness, according to the historian Lukacs (2001).
One can live and find happiness even in the worse circumstances, in the worse
distress, provided that much effort is vested in the search for happiness. In order
to be happy, people must renounce the easy way, which centers on the factors that
make them miserable; they will soon discover all of the things that seem to be
missing and to cause unhappiness. Yet, in order to be happy, one must gather all
physical and mental powers and organize and plan life, because the search for
happiness is a task that we accept voluntarily. And this is not easy. We need to
think about what makes us happy. Most people, however, are too lazy to think
about their own happiness, to think about what gives joy and pleasure, not to
mention meaning, to their lives. Thus they refuse to think about their future.
During World War II, Lukacs (2001) wrote in his autobiography that, in the midst
of hunger and bombing, misery, persecution, cold, and freezing weather, when he
was hiding in a dark basement and was afraid for his life every minute, what kept him
alive and even gave him happiness and faith for a better future—what prompted him
to plan for that future—was hope, together with reminiscences about pleasant
memories of his past life that gave him pleasure.
This page intentionally left blank
4
In March 2000 the findings of a survey entitled The Myth and Reality of the Elderly
Situation in America was published by the National Council on Aging. Participants
in the survey included adults aged eighteen or older. Its purpose was to discover
whether or not there were changes in the attitude of the American public toward
aging since the previous survey conducted in 1974.
Among the most striking findings of this survey were the following: Eighty-four
percent of the participants said that they would be very happy to live until age
ninety; forty-four percent of those aged sixty-five or older described the pres-
ent years of their lives as the best ones. Moreover, even the oldest of the old, those
in their late eighties or older agreed that these were the best years for them; sixty
percent of elderly black participants and fifty-seven percent of their Spanish-
speaking counterparts agreed with this statement.
The present life satisfaction of the elderly was far better than what was reported
in 1974. At that time, only thirty-two percent of elderly participants thought that
way. The meaning of these results, according to the president of the National
Council on the Aging in America, is that the country has entered a new era in
aging. This era may be characterized for millions by positive experiences and
meaningful living until age ninety or older. This is an option waiting for the aged.
But, despite all of the optimism from the results of this survey, we have to keep in
mind that aging is a phase of life that is full of difficulties for millions of older
Americans.
Today the attitude to the beginning of old age is different from what it used to
be in the past. Many elderly find chronological age meaningless; only 14 percent
of the participants in the present survey thought that a certain chronological age
is an indication of aging. On the subject of retirement two central factors were
mentioned by the participants: the amount of personal savings (sixty-four percent)
and health (fifty-nine percent). The most frequently mentioned definition of the
27
28 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
help them discover meaning to their lives and strengthen them in the spiritual
sense. One such way is offered by Professor Viktor Frankl in logotherapy, which
he has created, developed, and spread throughout the world for more than sixty
years.
WHAT IS LOGOTHERAPY?
Frankl (1962) has referred to logotherapy as a theory of motivation—a way of
thinking and a methodology combined. The aim is to enable clients to discover
meaning in their lives—rather than to satisfy their drives and instincts, as in
psychoanalysis (p. 103).
In every theory of psychology the essence of a human being is central. This
essence refers to a mental picture of what characterizes an individual, and this
picture helps explain the theory and the therapeutic method that emanate from
them. For Sigmund Freud biology was a determining factor in the evolution of
humankind. This is why Freud concentrated his work on biological, sexual, and
libidinal urges, drives, and instincts that influence human existence, especially in
the early phases of human development.
Frankl emphasized the adult phase of development, during which spiritual
determinants are more decisive than biological ones. According to Frankl, the
human spirit is the only healthy nucleus found in even the sickest individual.
In all of Frankl’s works a struggle to make the concept of meaning clear and
understandable in the modern world is apparent. This struggle is not limited to
the concept of meaning alone but encompasses all of the systems of people’s
relationship with themselves and with the meaning of their existence. Accord-
ing to Frankl’s biography (Klingberg, 2001), at the age of four Frankl was
already wrestling with the question of the meaning of life, and his struggle con-
tinued throughout his life. At age seventeen (Frankl, 1995, p. 36) he tackled the
question in a lecture entitled “The Meaning of Life,” given at the Volkshochschule
in Vienna (People’s College). On this occasion he presented the audience with
two main points that were later developed into his theory of logotherapy: first,
life does not answer our questions about the meaning of life but rather puts
those questions to us, leaving it for us to find the answers by deciding what we
find meaningful; second, the ultimate meaning of life is beyond the grasp of our
intellect but is something that we only can live by, without ever being able to
define it cognitively.
When criticized about his system of logotherapy as being basically a case
history of his own neurosis, similar to those of his predecessors Freud and Adler,
in The Unheard Cry for Meaning (1978), Frankl said that he was not entitled to
speak in this context, but, as far as logotherapy was concerned, he would gladly
confess that as a young man he had to go through the hell of despair over the
apparent meaninglessness of life. He added that he wrestled with it, as Jacob did
with the angel, until he could “say yes to life in spite of everything,” until he could
develop immunity against nihilism.
30 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
More than twenty-seven years ago, noted psychologist Irvin Yalom (1980) said
that logotherapy is basically religious, and, for this reason, it speaks mainly to the
common people in the street. What then is logotherapy?
Logotherapy is therapy for the sick, support for the sufferer, education for
the confused, and philosophy for the frustrated. Logotherapy includes and deals
with the biological, psychological, and spiritual dimensions of a human being.
And all of these dimensions come together and are expressed in the functional
dimension.
In addition to treating those suffering from neuroses that originate in the
spiritual dimension, logotherapy has developed methods for working with
clients who suffer from phobias in their sexual behavior, have incurable diseases,
or lead empty and meaningless lives. Logotherapy can also serve as a comple-
ment or supplement to conventional methods of psychotherapy for addicts,
victims of accidents, the physically disabled who have lost limbs, and others,
especially in cases in which the losses are accompanied by a lack of meaning in
life (Guttmann, 1996, p. 6).
Frankl’s main aim in creating logotherapy was to make psychotherapy more
human and to offer it as an additional way of looking at the world, both philo-
sophically and in therapy. Logotherapy has a universal message and mission—
namely, to counteract any tendencies to reduce human lives to tiny cogs in a large
machine. This mission was what Frankl saw all of his life as his major reason for
being in the world.
Logotherapy’s basic assumptions stem from anthropology, the view of human
nature; philosophy, the view of the world; and psychotherapy, the concept of therapy.
Its major concepts—freedom of the will, will to meaning, and meaning of life—
were based in no small measure on the philosophical writings of Schopenhauer
and Scheler, two German philosophers whose works appeared mainly in the first
half of the nineteenth century. For example, Freedom of the Will was one of
Schopenhauer’s most important books.
horrible physical and mental conditions, people can feel, even for an instant, joy
from the very thought and reflection on a loved person.
These three events were linked in a symbolic way to the three triangles of the
concept of meaning in logotherapy. The first of these triangles deals with the
concepts of freedom of the will, the will to meaning, and the meaning of life.
Freedom of the will is the opposite of fate. Even in the concentration camps
there was a measure of freedom: the freedom to choose one’s reaction to the liv-
ing conditions. The prisoners in the camps had to undergo a transformation from
independent people who were free to make decisions about the circumstances of
their lives into creatures who were forced to deal with the most inhuman, primi-
tive, and degrading conditions possible. It is no coincidence that many of the pris-
oners suffered from an intense feeling of inferiority in the face of their sadistic
tormentors.
Many prisoners succumbed to despair or fell into apathy, and many died for
lack of meaning in their lives. Frankl consoled his suffering fellow prisoners by
emphasizing that there was a meaning to their sufferings. And this meaning was
that someone was observing each one of them—expecting them not to frustrate
him or her and expecting them to bear their suffering proudly, not letting anyone
trample on their human dignity—and that each of them would know how to die
as a human being.
Frankl saw that even Sigmund Freud was wrong in his theory of human
behavior: he had assumed that people left without food for days would become
alike, that the hunger would diminish their differences until they disappeared. In
the concentration camps of the Nazis, the opposite was true. Some prisoners
behaved according to Freud’s assumption, but others were willing to share their
last piece of bread with their fellow prisoners. Frankl concluded that people are
capable of sinking to the bottom of the abyss, to the level of animals, and to com-
mit horrible and evil sins, but they can also become like angels and elevate them-
selves above and beyond all imagination and attain a purified level of spiritual
existence.
The concept of meaning in life is also divided into three components. These
constitute the second triangle and refer to the three values that can help people
discover meaning in their lives: creative, experiential, and attitudinal values. These
are discussed at length by the author in Logotherapy for the Helping Professional:
Meaningful Social Work (Guttmann, 1996). The third triangle is composed of
attitudinal values, such as the attitude to suffering, guilt, and death.
Frankl raised the question: How is it possible to refer to a human being in his
or her totality? He emphasized that the individual should not search for an
abstract meaning to life. Each one of us has an occupation or mission in life to do
something concrete, something that only he or she can and should do. And, in this
something, he or she cannot be replaced by anyone else, in the same way that his
or her life cannot be replaced by another person’s. Therefore the role of each
human being is unique, in the same way as the opportunity given for its fulfill-
ment is unique to each person (Frankl, 1962, pp. 108–109).
32 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
discovered its meaning; he said that a third of the cases that he treated were not
suffering from any clinically definable neurosis, but from the senselessness and
aimlessness of their lives (Jung, 1954, p. 83).
Jung placed great emphasis on transforming a human being into a unique and
independent personality by the development of inner strengths. When Jung
reached his fifties, he began to claim that the second half of life, from year thirty-
five and older, serves different purposes and goals than the first half of life. This
assumption is supported by his own life: until the age of thirty-five, Jung worked
mainly with severely psychotic patients. Later he decided that he did not feel him-
self strong enough to treat such people and began to work with mentally healthy
individuals, searching to find their unique way in life.
Jung has maintained that the first half of life is devoted mainly to success in
social and economical endeavors—marriage, occupation, and in raising children,
whereas the second half of life must be successful in cultural achievements and
accomplishments. According to Jung, women should not “roll down the curtains”
just because they pass their age of fertility. He saw in the second half of life a gift
from nature and said that, in the middle of life, after people have reached the peak
of their efforts and built the work of their life, they have the freedom to look back
and to question how their life has been shaped: they begin to search for the real
motivation to their existence and to discover their authentic self and uniqueness.
The discoveries that they make about themselves are possible only when they are
willing to pay a heavy price, because they may cause great commotion. The fol-
lowing is an example.
A client in his fifties told me—when he began to perceive that it was getting
late for him to achieve what he wanted all his life, that is, to devote himself to his
hobby and become a singer in the opera: “Until now I was a slave to my commit-
ments to work and home. Yet even if I didn’t do a thing to fulfill my dream, I
thought that I have the necessary talent. Now I see that I made a mistake. It is dif-
ficult for me to admit that I was wrong, that I made a mistake. It is hard for me to
accept this fact, but I have no choice. I went to see a music teacher. He gave me a
serious test and said that I could sing in a choir, but I could never be a soloist in
the opera, not even in his own choir. I look back upon my life and see that I missed
the many opportunities life gave me to fulfill my dream. This insight gives me
shivers. Can you feel how hard it is to forego a dream?”
It is impossible to solve great problems in life once and for all. One cannot dis-
cover a meaning that will be valid in every minute of life, from childhood to old
age. My client will have to find a new dream to fill his life with meaning or new
ways for making his old dream come true. The meaning of life can never be
achieved in a static answer to the question that life poses to us. It requires hard
and consistent work. It arouses in us a spiritual sense and prevents us from sink-
ing into foolishness or being fossilized.
Jung has shown that, in the second half of life, people wake up and feel their
powers and capabilities that were neglected, as did my client. Aging individuals
may achieve greater spiritual development by gaining understanding of their past,
Meaningful Living according to Logotherapy 35
dreams, way of life, and the meaning of their life events. They understand anew
what these events symbolize for them, and they can thus gain greater satisfaction
and happiness, by accomplishing their dreams and by finding new meaning to
their life. “Life has posed for me a question,” Jung said, “and I had to answer to the
best of my ability” (p. 451).
Jung perceived the world into which we are born as rude, coarse, rough, and
obscene, but nevertheless containing divine beauty. According to him, what people
wish to believe is dominant in the world depends on their mood: meaning or its
lack. Jung knew that, in terms of metaphysics, life is lacking meaning and yet is full
of meaning and hopes; in the end, meaning will gain and win (p. 451).
His home was destroyed by bombings. All his family, his parents, his brother, and his
wife were killed in the Holocaust. He was lonely and forlorn, without a home and
penniless. He was depressed and destitute and had thoughts about suicide. Then he
remembered that what kept him alive during his three and a half years in four con-
centration camps, aside from his hope to see his family, was the manuscript he wrote
about logotherapy. If he would commit suicide, then the chance for his ‘brain-child’
to see the light will be lost too. He gathered all his physical, mental, and spiritual
strength and instead of sinking into self-pity, he began to work furiously on the
manuscript he managed to reproduce in his mind. Thus he began to find new
meaning in life.”
The meaning of the moment changes from one minute to the next, from one
individual to another. The same situation may have a different meaning for a dif-
ferent person in the situation concerned. The situation itself is the same, but each
individual is different; therefore, each perceives the same situation in accordance
with his or her own perception, need, feeling, and understanding, which is pro-
jected onto the situation. Our task is to find the unique meaning that a particular
situation offers us. Sometimes behind the trivial things hide great opportunities for
meaning fulfillment. They seem to be hidden from the human eye, yet they exist.
Our conscience reveals the one thing that is required to actualize the meaning
in a specific situation. This is the meaning of the moment. This unique thing that
ought to be cannot be comprehended by rational terms or by universal law. It can
only be experienced intuitively. It is our inner voice, our inner monitor, which
needs to be heard and heeded to attain inner peace. This capacity can be used to
the fullest when a concrete choice has to be made, such as between placing an inca-
pacitated parent in a nursing home or caring for him or her at home until death.
The actor replied: “I think I can. You see, I know how to act, but the cantor knows
the Master.”
This episode illustrates Frankl’s attitude to the subject of “supra-meaning.”
Frankl (1962) believed in a world beyond the human world, one in which the
question about the final meaning of suffering will find an answer. This meaning
Frankl called the “supra” or “ultimate” meaning (p. 118). Therefore, in logotherapy,
Frankl speaks of another dimension in addition to the biological, psychological,
and spiritual: this dimension is supra-meaning.
Frankl devoted two of his books to clarifying this dimension. The first, pub-
lished in 1985 as his dissertation for the PhD, was The Unconscious God: Logother-
apy and Religion. The second, Man’s Search for Ultimate Meaning, was completed
close to his death in 1997 and contains most of what appeared in the first one with
the exception of two chapters: one about new research in logotherapy since 1975
and one about the search for the final meaning of life.
As an abstract concept, ultimate meaning is difficult to grasp, yet its existence is
evident. We just have to look around in nature and the cosmos to see that there is
order in the world, on our own planet Earth and beyond in infinite space. How did
this order come about? How does it work? How does it affect the lives of the people
on Earth, their individual and collective destinies? These are some of the questions
that the greatest philosophers, thinkers, humanists, and psychologists have asked and
continue to ask from one generation to the next. No one has real answers; no one has
seen this supra-meaning with his or her own eyes (unless they were prophets). And
yet there are opportunities in life for us to experience something extraordinary that
reaffirms the existence of that special dimension: peak experiences.
People are capable of glimpsing for a fleeting moment the mysteries of nature,
of feeling exultation, and of sensing a beauty that cannot be expressed in words.
For some individuals these moments can be provided by music, for others by the
arts, and for still others by nature. This is why we speak of a divine gift, as in the
music of Mozart or Beethoven, or as a result of a special encounter with another
human being. In all such instances we feel elation, a wonder that can give us a
fleeting insight into the great force or order that moves this world. Frankl (1986)
said that belief in a super meaning, whether as a metaphysical concept or in the
religious sense of God, is of the foremost psychotherapeutic and psycho-hygienic
importance. Such a belief adds immeasurably to human vitality. To such a faith,
nothing, ultimately, is meaningless (p. 32).
Frankl (1985) was aware that not every person can grasp a meaning beyond the
physical or psychological world. Therefore he used the concept of ultimate or
supra-meaning to convey something that is not comprehensible with our presently
available scientific means. Nevertheless, even those who do not believe in God are
aware that such a superhuman dimension exists. Frankl maintains that to be
human means to relate to something different from us or, to say it better, to some-
one different from us. We are directed toward the world beyond ourselves, and in
this world we wish to fulfill meanings. And this is possible only if we can transcend
ourselves. This is why the essence of human existence is self-transcendence.
38 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
Frankl was convinced that a religious sense exists in all human beings. Some-
times this sense is buried, and sometimes it is repressed in the unconscious.
Therefore even someone who is not religious in the broadest sense of this term
can find supra-meaning no less than the believer in God. Faith in God is either
without qualification, or it is not faith at all. A weak faith resembles a weak love:
crisis and tragedies weaken it, but a strong wind and enthusiasm inflame it. Those
who survived the Nazi concentration camps were divided into two groups: believ-
ers and nonbelievers in God, and the number of the believers whose faith
increased was much higher than that of the nonbelievers.
When Frankl was asked in an interview on the occasion of his ninetieth birth-
day whether he himself was religious, he answered: “I don’t feel debased or humil-
iated if someone suspects that I’m a religious person. If you call ‘religious’ a man
who believes in what I call a Super-meaning, a meaning so comprehensive that
you can no longer grasp it, get hold of it in rational intellectual terminology, then
one should feel free to call me religious” (cited by Matthew Scully in First Things,
April 1995, p. 43).
This page intentionally left blank
5
41
42 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
having children. Many famous personalities didn’t experience the pains and pleas-
ures of raising children, yet they were aware of the meaningfulness of their lives.
What is important for an aging person is to achieve something that can give sense
to his or her life. That old woman had loyally served the family she worked with for
many years. She had suffered a great deal as a lonely person, yet had shown courage
in the way she managed her pain and sorrow. When she heard and realized that her
life had meaning, she died peacefully, proud of her achievement (pp. 57–60).
Meaning is a potent force in each and every phase of our lives, irrespective of our
physical, family, occupational, or mental condition. Therefore, it makes sense to
search for meaning in every phase of life, even close to death. There is always some
choice one can make, even in the worst situation. One needs to be aware of one’s
choices and weigh them according to the importance of their meaning for one’s life.
This is a very important principle, especially for the widows and widowers who find
themselves in the situation of Abraham in the Bible, of whom it is said that old age
literally jumped on him when he lost his beloved wife Sarah. While not every wid-
owed man can remarry as Abraham did, each widower or widow can decide not to
succumb to despair and find his or her way by saying “yes” to life.
Human beings have the basic freedom to find meaning in life. In each problem
that one faces there is a measure of freedom to choose the most meaningful
response to the situation at hand.
Recently I met a colleague, a fifty-year-old woman who told me how she used
this principle. When she was forty years old her husband disappeared, together
with the family’s savings. He left a huge debt and the burden of caring for their
four small children on her alone. “At first,” she said, “I developed psychosomatic
reactions and fell ill. I couldn’t function at all. I thought that my life had ended.
This situation lasted for three weeks. I was immersed in my sorrow up to my neck.
But one morning I felt that I must make a decision: To remain psychologically
disabled for life, or to begin a new life. I chose the second option. I collected all
my spiritual strength and overcame the obstacles. Today I am independent,
strong, and successful, and my children are proud of me.”
left me for another woman,” she said, “I didn’t know how to write a check. I had
to learn many things about financial matters and simple accounting. I was so used
to the decisions of my husband that I didn’t think independently. And all of a
sudden the responsibilities fell on me. I suffered a lot because of my helplessness,
until the change came in the form of a dream.
“One night I dreamt that I was in a lake without a boat, sinking into the water
and close to drowning. There were no people around the lake that I could turn to
for help. I collected all my strength and began to swim until I got to the shore. When
I woke up I understood that the dream came to tell me that I must begin to swim,
or I would sink and die. I made a decision not to become a victim and started to
swim. Today I am standing on my feet independently, and am happy with my life.”
The second case illustration is Joe, my childhood friend. I encountered Joe after
decades in which we had not seen each other. When we were children we studied
in the same class. He told me that he became head accountant in a large factory and
is now retired. I remembered that as a child he had great difficulties with
mathematics and couldn’t solve most of the problems we got as homework. I even
helped him many times with these problems. And now he tells me that he was head
accountant. When he saw the surprise on my face he laughed, and said that his
father and the math teacher said to him quite often that he would never succeed.
He agreed with that assessment, until one day he decided to show them that they
were mistaken. He worked very hard and succeeded in making progress in an occu-
pation that is built on knowledge of mathematics. He used the defiant power of the
human spirit that was embedded in him and succeeded beyond expectations.
in medicine during the past few decades, recognition of the importance of the spiri-
tual dimension’s influence on mental health is too slow, or missing to a large extent.
THE FIFTH PRINCIPLE: MAN CAN RISE ABOVE AND BEYOND HIMSELF
The uniquely human ability to rise above and beyond physical or mental
limitations by virtue of love for the sake of another person in need is the fifth
principle. People are capable of performing great feats by tapping into their spirit,
such as donating a liver or a kidney to a sick daughter or son, or excelling in
science, in arts, and in sports when physically disabled.
For example, a sixty-year-old woman donated one of her kidneys to her sick
daughter despite the risk to her own health. This daughter endured dialysis for
many years and underwent two unsuccessful kidney transplant operations. The
kidney she received from her mother gave this daughter a new lease on life for
several years.
for us. We should not live in the past, but concentrate on the present and look for-
ward to goals we wish to accomplish in the future in order to live meaningful lives.
For example, Mrs. Smith, age fifty-eight, became suddenly unemployed after
thirty years as head of a boarding school. She had two options: To enjoy her new
status and refrain from additional work, or to gather her strength and begin
building a new career. She decided to use her life experience, talents, and capa-
bilities in voluntary work with refugees. She defended her choice by saying three
simple words: “They needed me.”
care for her husband gave meaning to her life during those hard times. When her
husband died, she felt a great emptiness within herself and tried to overcome this
void and to fill up her psychological battery by escaping to a life of leisure and
entertainment. Mrs. Brown visited museums, theaters, concerts, the opera, and
the movies, and went from one party to the next. There were no free nights. All
these activities were in vain because she could not find the mental calmness she
was seeking, and life seemed empty and meaningless to her. When she changed
her lifestyle and began to work as a volunteer in a nursing home, she felt that she
had come home and was living again. Suddenly she found what she was searching
for. This discovery gave new meaning to her life.
emphasizing his achievements along with his failures; achievements that no one
could take away from him. The emphasis on the achievements–rather than on the
failures–helped the client to see himself in a new and different light. He received
support from an authority. The therapist urged this man to take responsibility for
his life in the present, rather than dwelling on the past. This young man told the
therapist that there were people in his life who had helped him to get out of
difficult situations. The insight this client received from the therapeutic dialogue
made a turn in his life: He found meaning in the effort that he would have to make
to fulfill his dream—to free himself from the spider’s web in which he was
entangled, without fear of failure.
51
52 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
His prophecy has become reality. Nietzsche said that whoever takes one of his
books in hand will feel that he or she has been given the most precious gift that
can be given to man (p. 55). Nietzsche had a special relationship with another
great philosopher, whom he considered almost equal to him, Schopenhauer. In his
recently published book titled My Sister and Me (2004), Nietzsche wrote that his
place in history is almost secure, but when he remembers Schopenhauer, who was
a whole person despite his faults, more attentive and madder than Nietzsche could
ever be, he cannot forgive him (p. 117).
This original philosopher revolted against all the previous philosophies and
commonly accepted social mores that had influenced mankind for long centuries
prior to his appearance on the scene of world history. Nietzsche assumed that the
development of science and critical thinking in Western history and civilization
led to the loss of mankind’s ability to believe in what is beyond reach—meaning
the concept of God—as the basis for life. Nietzsche expressed his philosophy in a
series of publications that were unique and stunning in terms of their ideas, rich-
ness of opinions, deep knowledge of history, mythology, poetry, music, and intel-
lectual thought. Nietzsche emphasized that concepts such as world order, God’s
will, and reason are nothing more than the creations of human thought. They
have no power over our lives and cannot tell us how to live our lives. He tried to
shape a vision of healthy life. Accordingly, he said that people could gain such
health when they are willing to forego their belief in those antiquated and
outdated concepts.
Nietzsche was also the first psychologist in the modern sense of this term.
There are many thinkers who consider Nietzsche the first psychoanalyst in the
Western world. His importance for logotherapy is even greater, for he laid the
foundation for the theory of mankind’s spiritual motivation in life. Although
Freud thought that our behavior and basic motivation in life are vested in the will
to experience pleasure and Adler thought that it was in power and in ruling
others, Frankl perceived human motivation as being centered on discovering
meaning in life. This idea was actually taken from Nietzsche’s attitude toward
human behavior.
Nietzsche has shown in his writings how dependent we became on the values
that were created by our values. We are not able to move without them in our daily
lives, for without them we have no yardstick by which to judge the quality of our
actions. Therefore we are limited because of them. This paradox in Nietzsche’s
attitude toward values forces us to think, and to find our place in the world of
values without getting towed away to nihilism.
According to Nietzsche, it is not possible to accomplish a work of great art
without experience. Nor is it possible to attain high social standing immediately;
nor to become a great lover at the first attempt. In the pause between failures and
subsequent successes, in the gap between what we wish to become one day and
what we are today, must come pain, anxiety, jealousy, and humiliation. This atti-
tude toward the present and future is one of many ideas Frankl has incorporated
into logotherapy.
The Courage to Be Authentic 53
How can one recognize the healthy individual? It is in the way this individual
influences our senses with the pleasantness of his or her appearance and ways.
Such a person is hard, yet noble, as if carved from a fine tree, finds medication and
cures to all problems, turns each obstacle to advantage, for what does not kill him
or her, strengthens him or her. Such a person does not believe in sin, or in misery;
knows how to manage himself or herself and others; knows to forget, and is strong
enough to turn everything in his or her favor. From these aphorisms we can
deduce what Nietzsche would have said about finding meaning in the second half
of life.
FREEDOM TO CHOOSE
In addition to the philosophers of antiquity and the modern era, Frankl was
heavily influenced by the philosophy of Nietzsche. Consequently, Frankl incorpo-
rated many concepts of this great philosopher into the theory of logotherapy, such
as the attitude toward health and sickness. Nietzsche built his philosophy on say-
ing yes to life, and so did Frankl. And it is not just coincidence that Frankl’s most
famous book, Man’s Search for Meaning (1962), was originally titled in German
Trotzdem Ja zum Leben Sagen (1982), in English: “Despite Everything Say Yes to
Life.” Nietzsche used the term “despite everything” in his book Thus Spoke Zarathus-
tra in order to denote his attitude toward life; accordingly all portentous things are
created by this “despite everything.”
For Frankl this “despite” was expressed in the unconditional acceptance of life,
for only while living can one create experience, transcend difficulties, and acquire
meaning. Frankl’s experiences in life strengthened his concepts and ideas regard-
ing human existence in the world. Frankl always emphasized one’s spiritual com-
mitment to life, to one’s role and purpose. What human beings give to life, and the
way in which they deal with the problems and difficulties that life poses them,
determine the meaning of their lives. A positive attitude toward life and its accept-
ance without reservations, despite any condition or price, resembles old Jewish
traditional values which perceive life as sacred. The sanctity of life is expressed in
the saying: “Who saves one life—saves a whole world.”
Nietzsche and Frankl held similar attitudes about freedom and choice. An indi-
vidual is perceived by both philosophers as one who craves freedom as he or she
craves air to breathe; one who is capable of choosing his or her way in life. In all
of Nietzsche’s philosophical works one can see how historical and biological fac-
tors work as if behind mankind’s back, and influence the decisions of people with-
out their being aware of it. Even when the limitations are perceived and identified,
there remains the belief in one’s ability to rise above one’s condition and to be the
master of one’s fate. The choice that exists in any situation, according to logotherapy,
has its source in Nietzsche’s concept of philosophy.
Frankl emphasizes that choice is available to us in any situation, even in those
that seem to be hopeless and offer no chance of survival or success. We can always
say “yes” or “no” to what happens to us and to what stands in front of our eyes as
54 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
Courage as a unique human virtue is among the four cardinal virtues the
ancient Greek philosophers regarded as essential for anyone interested in serving
the public. This courage is unlike the one exhibited in the battlefield; it is unlike
courage forged by lack of any other choice but to fight for the principles and values
that are most important to one. This courage means taking full responsibility for
the decisions one makes and for the actions one voluntarily accepts.
Like Sigmund Freud, who was expelled from the Prussian Academy of Sciences
and was not allowed to teach at the University of Vienna in Austria due to his ideas
about human sexual behavior being the major motivation in life, and yet contin-
ued to develop his psychoanalysis without fear; and like Nietzsche, who showed
extraordinary courage in the face of the Church by clinging to his philosophical
belief, and who despite his illness and economic difficulties did not waver, Frankl
too was blessed with this unique trait and virtue. Thus he can serve as a model for
any man, old or young. The courage of Frankl never left him and was expressed
in many areas of his life. This courage—more than any other philosophical
concept—Frankl borrowed from Nietzsche for the development of logotherapy,
and he demonstrated it in his life.
Frankl’s courage was expressed early when at age sixteen he rebelled against a
chemistry teacher’s assertion that human beings are no more than machines with
internal combustion. Frankl’s protest at that incident later became the corner-
stone of logotherapy. Frankl fought all his life against any attempt to reduce and
rob somebody of human dignity by stating that a person is no more than a
machine in need of repair—whether in medicine or in psychology.
His courage led Frankl to the development of logotherapy as a theory of
motivation in human behavior, separate and different from the theories of his
teachers Freud and Adler. Frankl admired both of these men, was influenced by
them, and learned much from them in medicine and psychiatry. He never forgot
the debt owed to these men by the scientific world, and always emphasized that
it was Freud who laid the foundations for modern psychology and psychother-
apy, while Adler made contributions to both. Nevertheless, Frankl had the
courage to depart from their theories and to establish his own approach to
human behavior.
Frankl’s height psychology is a testimony to this courage. As indicated before,
climbing in the Alps strengthened his natural tendency to look upon men and
women as spiritual beings whose central will is to carry out an idea, a mission for
the attainment of which they were born. Realization of ideas or a mission is
possible only in the spiritual dimension, in the notion of freedom, and in the
knowledge and awareness that a person is not chained in spirit; that there are
peaks in development one can yearn for; and that a person has powers that enable
him or her to conquer any peak. This is why Frankl placed these human traits at
the center of logotherapy.
Nietzsche’s influence on Frankl is evident in the latter’s attitude toward religion.
Frankl wrote a doctoral thesis to explain the logotherapeutic use of concepts, such
as the spiritual unconscious, conscience, and medical ministry. Contrary to Nietzsche,
56 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
who negated religion, Frankl saw religion positively, as a necessary power for good
mental health.
ON FOLLOWING A CLOUD
Frankl compared the uniqueness of an individual’s way in life to the Biblical
story about the wanderings of the Hebrews in the desert after the exodus from
Egypt where they were slaves. God’s cloud that led them there was used by Frankl
to illustrate the goal that should lead those who follow it. And in the same way
that this cloud was different during the day and at night, when it became a pillar
of fire, so are various events in life and the problems with which one must strug-
gle. Yet God’s cloud had another characteristic: it was always above and in front of
the heads of its followers, and it could not be reached. People could only follow it,
and get close to it, if not physically then mentally. For this cloud symbolizes the
spiritual dimension with which one is blessed and by which one is able to work
wonders. This approach to one’s spiritual dimension has important implications
for mental health, and Frankl made good use of it in the methodology of
logotherapy.
Frankl adopted the view of Goethe, the German poet, writer, and philosopher,
who said that if we wish to help someone who is in distress, or suffering from a
conflict or a dilemma he or she cannot solve, we should not look upon him or her
as he or she is now, but should approach him or her as he or she could be in the
future. Changing one’s attitude toward self and the world is possible by use of the
spiritual dimension. People are blessed with the ability to take a stand against
the circumstances of life, fate, genetic inheritance, education, and all other influ-
ences in their long years of growing up. This applies especially to people who
suffer from illnesses. They should be reminded that only their bodies are sick, not
their spirits, and they can always take a stand against what ails them. They can
choose their attitude toward the circumstances of their existence.
life seems long and projects forward and far away, in the latter years life is
perceived as short, and gets shorter with each passing year.
One understands the shortness of life only after one gets old. Until age thirty-six,
which for Schopenhauer symbolized the middle of life, we live from the interest,
for the force of life we use renews itself again and again. Later on we begin to use
the capital too; at first in small sums, then at a faster tempo. The same holds true
for our spiritual energy and for its elasticity; these are abundant in the first half of
life, until age forty at the latest, and from then on they diminish slowly and grad-
ually. Yet there is compensation for this loss—knowledge and experience—which
in the second half of life grow and become richer.
Schopenhauer claimed that the first forty years give us the text of life, and the
next thirty years (today forty or even fifty) the explanation of the text. This expla-
nation reveals the meaning of our lives. Only in old age is one really able to under-
stand oneself, said Schopenhauer, but on one condition: That one is absolutely
sincere with oneself. The old individual frees himself or herself from the illusions
of the young, is able to judge the true value of things, and recognizes the insignif-
icance of material things. He or she ceases to be amazed from what is going on in
the world, and stops believing in happiness.
Many people pursue all kinds of roles, honors, and social status in the second
half of life, stating that these provide sense to their lives, while actually they are
running away from boredom. When these people get old, they are unable to pur-
sue these same enterprises. They feel boredom and emptiness. People who
develop their spiritual powers find themselves free of boredom all their lives,
including their old age in particular.
At the other end of that experience are pain and suffering. Like boredom,
suffering and pain are two experiences very likely to be encountered in old age.
Spiritual powers help in the struggle against boredom and against certain kinds of
suffering. Yet these are not enough. There is a need for economical resources too.
Whoever lives in poverty and destitution is at times helpless to rise above the pain
and suffering in his or her circumstances.
Schopenhauer was aware of the contradictions between his high philosophy, with
its negation of human existence, and this book in which he relates favorably to life in
this world. But he also hastened to emphasize that all of his assumptions are tempo-
rary and far from being whole, for the subject cannot be dredged to its very bottom.
Following the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle, Schopenhauer too divided
human life into three parts: external things, the psyche, and the body. Differences
in the fates of human beings he based on three things: The personality of a person,
including his or her health, beauty, mood, moral character, understanding and
education; his or her wealth and resources in the broadest sense; and his or her
role. Of these Schopenhauer referred mainly to the last, the role of a person.
Schopenhauer saw in this role the reflection of a person in the eyes of others, as
they imagine this person in their mind’s eye and their opinion of him or her.
These are expressed in the honor, respect, status, and good name accorded to that
person (2001, p. 7).
The Courage to Be Authentic 59
values regarding family life and morals, and when life seemed absurd, for all the
previous ideologies were then found to be empty of value and meaning.
The central questions people were asking at that time were the same ones that
are asked each time a great calamity falls upon society: Why survive? Is life worth
all this suffering? Is it not better to commit suicide? In the second half of life we
may find ourselves in a similar situation when we must retire from work against
our will and lose livelihood and social status; when our health deteriorates, the
self-image is hurt and we feel superfluous in the world.
I met Elisabeth, aged fifty-two, in a major city on the West Coast. She was
afraid that her fate would be similar to that of her mother, who struggled with
pain and torment for years and died of breast cancer. Elisabeth began to study
medicine to overcome her fear, but was not able to deal with her lack of hope. She
left her studies and tried to forget about cancer; even managed to cheat herself for
some time, but all her struggle was in vain. When she found symptoms of cancer
in her body, she was forced to realize that the cancer had struck her too. The dis-
covery of this illness tormented her a great deal. Elisabeth asked herself again and
again: Why survive? Why suffer? Is there any hope for recovery, or that some new
medication would wipe out cancer? Is it not better to die now and avoid addi-
tional suffering? A while later she began to think about suicide in earnest. And
indeed, after a few years I heard that she ended her life tragically.
The case of Elisabeth is not unique. Recently I heard about the suicide of a
sixty-eight-year-old man with many accomplishments who was struck by
Alzheimer’s disease. This man too preferred to commit suicide rather than
become a burden on his family.
Albert Camus, the writer and philosopher known for his books that stress the
absurdity of life, gave a positive answer to these questions. Camus said that by
accepting the absurdity called life, and by willing it consciously, one is able to
overcome one’s fate. In his important work The Plague and The Myth of Sisyphus
(1991), Camus presents a tragic and absurd hero. Sisyphus was condemned by the
gods to roll a stone up to the top of a hill forever; upon reaching the top, the stone
would roll back and he had to start working again and again endlessly. The gods
thought that this punishment of Sisyphus, who betrayed their secret and rebelled
against their will, would break his spirit, for there is no worse thing then work
without hope and utility. Yet, the gods were mistaken. Sisyphus’s spirit did not
break! He won a moral victory!
The torture of Sisyphus by the gods seems inhuman and terrible, and yet
Camus says: “At the moment this man is returning from the top of the mountain
I see him walking erect and with measured steps toward the torture whose end he
will never see, and every time he leaves the top of the mountain he transcends his
fate. He is stronger than the stone that he must push upward” (p. 124).
Camus emphasizes that this myth is tragic because the hero is conscious of his
fate. Sisyphus is aware of his situation and thinks about it when he descends from
the hill. This is the time when his tragedy begins. Despite his blindness, he is aware
that each atom in this rock, each drop of mineral in the mountain creates a world
The Courage to Be Authentic 61
in itself. The struggle on the way to the top of the mountain is enough to fill his
heart with joy. Sisyphus bursts into a roar: “All these suffering, my advanced years
and greatness of my spirit bring me to conclude that everything is good” (p.125).
According to the theory of logotherapy, the struggle to achieve meaning in life
is the most important struggle. There are many aging people who cease to con-
tinue the struggle, and now they expect that someone else will give meaning to
their lives. But life empty of content is no less hard than the life of Sisyphus. Even
if the struggle means suffering, pain, and disappointment, these strengthen the
spirit. As long as one struggles, one is alive emotionally. One gets more mature,
more seasoned, and richer spiritually by the struggle. Sisyphus found meaning in
his suffering, and that meaning gave him the strength to carry on his suffering and
to find a few minutes of grace.
result of this search, one’s heart can accept the past, live a responsible life in the
present, and plan the future realistically and with optimism.
double cry.” The dream happens in some cave or building made of clay, or in a
dense forest. In his dream, he is struggling vigorously with a small animal and
suddenly everything becomes quiet, and he stands alone and cries out. This cry
sounds the same every time and turns into a poem or song, and when it ends his
heart stops beating. But then, from a great distance, another cry comes closer to
him, a cry similar to his own, and this cry is not an echo. This cry appears as a long
series of questions. Each time the cry is different, and each time it is new. And
when the cry is finished, he is stricken with the knowledge that it now happened.
It happened now, only now when there was an answer to his cry.
After he had dreamt this dream in exactly the same way many times, Buber had
a dream that started as usual, but later was different from his previous dreams:
There was no reply to his cry. Buber explains the lack of answer by his waiting for
the answer. Until this dream he had not waited for an answer. The answer came
by itself. Now that he waited for the answer, it refrained from coming. And then
something happened. He opened his entire being to space; he opened himself to
all senses and perceptions. And then the cry appeared all over without sound. It
didn’t come. It was there, and let itself be felt, let itself be heard. Buber describes
how he heard this cry in all of his being, in all of his entity, and it was more whole
than ever. And when the dream came to its end, and he finished absorbing it, he
felt more secure than ever before, for “now it has happened” (pp. 1–3).
The uniqueness of the individual must be preserved in old age too, and even in
death. It is told of Rabbi Bunam, one of the most famous Hasidic rabbis, that
when he was old and blind he said, “I would not like to change places with
Abraham, our forefather. What good would happen to God if Abraham was blind
like me, and Bunam would become Abraham? Instead, I think that I have to try to
become a little more like myself.”
Frankl related the same idea when he maintained that there is no need to
search for an abstract meaning in life (Frankl, 1962). Each human being has a con-
crete and unique task that requires fulfillment. And in this task he cannot be
replaced by someone else. No other philosopher could describe this idea better
than Hillel the Elder, who lived some two thousand years ago and said, “If I am
not for myself—who is for me? And if I am only for myself—what am I? And if
not now—when?” Frankl used this maxim of Hillel to stress humankind’s unique-
ness and ability to elevate human existence to a higher level.
7
“What is the meaning of our existence, and what is the meaning of the existence of
all living creatures?” asked Albert Einstein (1934) in his autobiography. To answer
this question, he said, means to be religious. “You ask: Is it reasonable at all to ask
this question? And I answer you: He who finds his own life and the lives of other
people lacking meaning is not only unhappy but is hardly fit to live.” (Einstein,
pp. 13–14)
Questions about the meaning of life were always problematic. They provoked, and
still provoke, heated debates among scientists, philosophers, and religious leaders.
The need to understand the essence of our existence in the world remains as
strong and urgent as it did in the distant past. The difficulty in understanding the
essence of our existence is related to our inability to see life as one link in a chain
that can be compared to other links. It is not surprising therefore that many
people turn to religion as the source of welcome relief from the doubts they
experience about living and the value of life in general.
65
66 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
old man said, “If man is connected to what is above, he can hardly fall on what is
below” (Jacobson, 1995, pp. 231–232).
The late Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the foremost Hasidic leader in
the Jewish world, said that religion and science can dwell together because both
may be regarded as motivating forces in life. He also emphasized that there are two
forms of faith. One is of the children and the ignoramus. For them, faith is blind.
It needs direction and it serves as support because of their weakness. The other
form is the faith of those who have already come a long way in life and have gained
an understanding that there is an obstacle that cannot be passed without faith.
Rabbi Schneerson said, “If we are searching for the truth then we have already laid
the foundation of belief in God. Yet, like in all dynamic relationships, the process
of search is long and hard” (Jacobson, 1995, p. 194).
According to Rabbi Schneerson, there are two approaches in the search for
truth: The human search via science and the search via God. There is no question
that the universe is guided by logic. At the outset, man begins searching for truth
from the outside in, trying to understand various phenomena and then piece
them together like a jigsaw puzzle to make a complete picture.
“Scientists and philosophers peer through the outer layers of the universe to
discover the forces lying within. What we are all actually searching for, whether or
not we acknowledge it, is God, the hand inside the glove. But if we choose instead
to search for the truth from the “inside out,” looking directly through the eyes of
the creator and abiding by His laws, we begin to gain a more complete
understanding of how the world operates and why” (Jacobson, 1995, p. 194). True
science and true religion are two sides of the same coin.
There is a strong connection between science and belief in God. Rabbi
Schneerson had high esteem for the way science has dramatically improved our
living conditions in the material and technological sense. However, he
emphasized, we must understand that science is basically a search and not an
absolute method of knowledge.
Science is based on a number of theories that can be used for good and bad.
Therefore, meaning in life must be based on morals and creativity. The search for
a deeper meaning of life beyond the material encompasses millions and millions of
people all over the world. It does not matter how happy, capable, rich, or talented
we are. Sooner or later we have a need to discover the deeper meaning of life.
Many elderly and young people live in a historical era in which material things
are more valuable than spiritual things. Many people have no idea about God and
what He demands from us. We have a lot of free time, but we fail to fill it up with
spiritual content and meaning. It is difficult to find wise guidance because all the
teachers, politicians, and parents are helpless when confronted with questions
about the meaning of life. Rabbi Schneerson said that man can never be happy if
he does not nourish his soul as he does his body (Jacobson, 1995, p. 3).
Once a man came to him and complained about the lack of meaning in his life.
This man told the Rabbi that he had a good and healthy family and a successful
professional career, but at the end of the day he felt empty and lonely.
The Concept of Meaning in Religion and Literature 67
“Are you leaving time for your soul?” asked the Rabbi.
“How could I find time for my soul when I am so busy with my work and my
family?” answered this man.
“There is an old saying,” said the Rabbi, “that when two men meet this means
two souls against one body. Since bodies are centered in themselves by nature, they
cannot unite their strengths—each one pursues after his physical needs. The souls,
contrary wise, are not egoistic by nature, and therefore when two men combine
their strengths, their souls unite” (Jacobson, 1995, p. 3).
This story implies that in the second half of life it is important to leave time
for spiritual activities. For a religious person such activities may be studying the
Holy Scriptures, devoting himself to literature or music (sacred and secular), or
doing some other leisure time activity that occupies the spirit. By gradually
engaging in such activities, one prepares himself for the years after retirement
when the habit gained would give pleasure and satisfaction to one’s life.
To live a meaningful life, according to Rabbi Schneerson, means to pierce the
hard layers of outside material that cover one’s heart and join the inner energy.
This is not a simple or easy task because the body acts via its senses and the soul
by more refined, noble, and gentle spiritual powers. These cannot be measured or
weighed because man has many mysteries that oppose scientific measurement.
The body tries to hold us to the earth, but the soul has power to lift us up, beyond
the earth and beyond material existence.
A beautiful illustration to this idea was given by Jacobson (1995) in the name
of the Rabbi:
A rabbi when he was a young boy, played with his friends who climbed on a ladder.
All the little children were afraid to climb to the top of the ladder except this boy.
Later his grandfather asked: “Why you were not afraid when all the others did?” The
boy said: “When they climbed up, they looked down. They saw how high they have
arrived and were stricken with fear. But when I climbed, I looked up and saw how
low I still was, and this motivated me to climb higher.” (Jacobson, 1995, p. 7)
this world to a narrow bridge that had a deep abyss on each side. In order to cross
that bridge safely, man has to be equipped with a strong faith and a heroic soul.
Life, according to Rabbi Nachman, contains many troubles, and lots of
depression, sadness, ups, and downs. One who has faith spends his life in happiness
because when things go well and he has what he needs he feels good. And even if the
opposite is true it is still good because he is sure that despite his misery God will take
mercy on him in the future and will end his days happily (Raz, 1986, p. 43).
A religious and philosophical attitude toward life could serve people entering
the second half of life, in which questions about the worthiness of life become
more urgent than before. Carl Gustav Jung, the psychoanalyst, said that the life of
a man is built on two parts: One part from luck and the other part from absence
of luck, and we don’t know ahead of time which part will fall in our lap when we
pass age fifty. We must be ready to accept the good and the bad.
only to find out that these delights cannot serve as substitutes for a spiritually
meaningful life.
Hrabal (2001), the great Czech writer of our time, wrote a delightful autobiog-
raphy—Memories of a Class Repeater (2001)—when he was in his eighties and
close to his death. Hrabal wrote that from now on his way in life would be back-
ward. “I had enough with all the information! Now I want to know who I am. Why
am I here? What for? Where am I going? And from where did I come? Who stands
beside me and who is against me? What is above me and what is below?” (p. 284)
Hrabal presents in this book the simplest and most difficult questions in life.
These are questions that each person must answer alone. These are questions that
each person must answer candidly, deep inside one’s soul. These are questions that
are impossible to escape. They always appear, whether one is conscious or fast asleep.
Leo Tolstoy, the Russian writer, held a unique attitude toward the meaning of
life. In The Death of Ivan Illich (1992), originally published in 1886, we can witness
his philosophy that even in the face of death the life of a man can be meaningful.
In Tolstoy’s book, death and insight appear simultaneously. The hero is a high-
ranking clerk in the government who discovers that the life he has had until he
became terminally ill was meaningless.
Tolstoy wrote, “The life of Ivan Illich was simple, ordinary and terrible” (p. 193).
“And he knew that he was dying. In his depth of soul he knew that he was dying,
but he did not get used to the thought. He simply didn’t understand, and could
not perceive that it is possible” (p. 225).
The dying man remembers only the happiness and love he has had. His pains
disappear the minute he stops holding on desperately to life. Through his
suffering the hero gains insight and develops far beyond what was expected of him
by his immediate environment. Ivan Illich becomes a man with inner greatness;
and this greatness of soul nullifies all that has been done until then and makes his
life meaningful. In his death, Ivan Illitch becomes a man who is able to transcend
himself and turn his suffering into great human achievement.
The heroes in Shakespeare’s play King Lear (1947) and Balzac’s book Father
Goriot (1991) are sad figures in their old age. They seem to live a pitiful life,
forgotten by their children—except when the latter are in need of money and
power—isolated and cast away, and weak in body and spirit. They present an ugly
picture of aging, and their fates are even more depressing. One can deduce from
their travails that there is no greater calamity in life than old age. They are a far
cry from those old and much respected philosophers of antiquity, so beautifully
described by Cicero (1909), who attracted the youth by their wisdom and life
experience as a magnet attracts iron. Plato would have liked such people as leaders
and rulers in his ideal state because old people are interested in safeguarding their
moral virtues and standing for what they have fought for and suffered for all their
lives. They know, with few exceptions, that there is no time left for new ventures,
whereas it is easy to destroy the existing ones that have been accumulated.
In Souls on Fire, Elie Wiesel (1993), winner of the 1986 Nobel Peace Prize, refers
to the question of the absurdity of living by saying that man can take a stand
70 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
toward the world and toward life through irony and humor, or in other ways.
Wiesel presents the following Hasidic story to illustrate his approach to meaning:
A Hassid came to see Rabbi Menachem Mendel of Kotzk and complained: “Rabbi,
I have terrible thoughts lately.” “What are those,” asked the Rabbi. I am afraid of
mentioning them,” said the Hassid. “Nevertheless, tell me,” said the Rabbi. “Some-
times I reflect that God forbid there is no law and no judge.” “So, what do you care,”
said the Rabbi. “If there is no law and no judge,” cries the Hassid, “then what
purpose is there to life and to the world?” “So what do you care if the world has no
purpose,” said the Rabbi. “If the world has no purpose,” said the Hassid, “then there
is no sense to the Torah, no sense to life, and this, Rabbi, I mind very much.” “If you
mind this so much, then you are a good Jew, and a good Jew may have such
thoughts,” said the Rabbi.
If life is meaningless, objectively speaking, then we should turn the search for
meaning inward. The reasonable thing to do is to care for what gives us meaning
inside. Life has meaning as long as we discover its meaning for ourselves by
engaging in meaningful activities that give purpose and taste to life. Even if life is
absurd, as some existentialist philosophers claim, man does not necessarily need
to be absurd.
In terms of logotherapy, awareness about the search for meaning is connected
to the concept of responsibility. Logotherapy emphasizes the importance of here
and now in existential philosophy for meaningful living. One should not waste
time in futile reflections about days past because these prevent one from doing
the unique task of one’s life. A life without meaning is punished by feelings of
emptiness, disappointment, and suffering. Logotherapy claims that there is
always a choice in each life situation. An individual can choose what is really
important for him, and do what his choice demands from him. Man is free to
find his own way in life. Logotherapy rejects a deterministic attitude toward life.
If we accept such an attitude, then our lives will pass in despair.
8
Life as a Task
It is written in the book of Job (5:7) that man was created to toil. Humans must
be productive; otherwise, their lives remain empty and meaningless. All human
beings have to work, even older people. They also need to remain productive
throughout life. An old man must work and toil even if this toil is not linked to
earning a living.
Life is a task by which each human being can realize his or her potential for
meaningful living. A most moving proof of this maxim is given by Bohumil
Hrabal, the Czech writer and winner of the Nobel Prize for literature, in his book
Too Noisy Silence (1994). This book, published in the author’s old age, presents a
man who works with a hydraulic press—alone in a damp, poorly lit basement—
for thirty-five years. His job consists of transforming all kinds of waste papers,
using the hydraulic press, into huge bundles that he decorates with paintings of
the saints, which have been thrown away along with other waste paper.
The story unfolds during the communist era in Czechoslovakia. Hantya, the
hero, develops a deep love for the old machine and for the literary classics in world
literature that have been thrown into this basement as waste paper. Hantya saves
these from destruction and oblivion, fills his small apartment with these books,
and carries on a brilliant discussion with the characters in them.
Hantya finds special meaning in this work by turning the poor, grey, depressing
conditions and loneliness of his work and life, even the noise of the machine, into
extraordinary experiences. In his imagination, Hantya creates a wonderful world,
a world full of meaning, beauty, and enchantment. Thus he is able to detach him-
self from the depressing reality that would otherwise close in on him; he is able to
elevate himself above the conditions and circumstances of his life and to discover
the treasures that hide in the mountains of waste paper falling down from the
overhead hole into which the trucks unload their cargo. Hantya finds meaning in
life by discovering a rare book that he is able to save.
71
72 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
Hantya describes this work, this task, and this way of life as follows: “Like a
beautiful little fish that appears suddenly in the muddy water, so does a rare book
appear glistening in the waste papers surrounding it. I turn my eyes for a moment
blinded and afterward I fish it out, wipe and dry it with my apron. I open it, sniff
the text a little, read the first sentence my eye fells upon, and I put it along with
the rest of my treasures in the box” (p. 9).
Reading classical literature opens a new world for Hantya, one filled with
wisdom and beauty. After the day’s work is over, he carries the treasure back
home, full of expectation that in the evening he will discover something of himself
that he did not know (Hrabal, p. 14).
Hantya accepts his life with love, lives life the way he wants, and takes
responsibility for his choices. Hantya is content with himself and with his actions,
an exemplification of what Frankl (1962) emphasized: that meaning can be found
in any situation or circumstance if one is open to receive it.
When we acquire awareness about our task in life, we also acquire a value that is
important for our mental health. There is nothing more important than this aware-
ness, because it enables us to cope successfully with the difficulties, disillusions,
pains, disappointments, frustrations, and hardships that happen along our way in
life. Every person who has survived a life-threatening illness, who was a captive or a
prisoner of war, or who suffered yet survived life in a concentration camp or in a
ghetto by the strength of his or her spirit, would most likely say that the source of
this strength was the knowledge that there was a role for waiting to be filled. There-
fore, these individuals had to find the courage and make every effort to survive, to
carry all of the burdens and pain. For only that knowledge and work toward its
fulfillment can make one able to withstand the vicissitudes of life. In this connec-
tion, Frankl (1986) liked to cite a famous saying of the philosopher Nietzsche:
“Whoever has a reason for living endures almost any mode of life” (p. 54).
The task of human beings is vested in the attitude to work: the urge to work and
to accomplish something in the world is a most important part of life. The task of
humans in the world is exemplified not only by their work but by the way that they
live. All through life, people have to develop virtues to elevate them from the
biological and animal characteristic of their existence to the spiritual one. Living
life according to virtue is the best proof that we are capable of overcoming our
weaknesses and shortcomings and of rising above ourselves for the sake of other
human beings or of certain ideals.
Tension and stress are integral parts of life. Spiritual tension strengthens
people and helps them in their quest to live their life as it should be, rather than
as it is. Thus, what is called self is the struggle and the tension not to remain the
same all through life—which, in any case, is impossible—but the need to
become a personality, someone willing to wrestle with the tensions that
determine one’s place in the world. This wrestling is continuous, without end,
similar to that of Sisyphus. And one’s life story is the proof of what has been
achieved in this struggle.
Our existence always points to the future; we are always interested in achieving
something. Our deeds in the past may be seen as successes or failures. Our
existence in the present is determined not only by our past but also by what we
wish to become in the future. We are not supposed to inquire or to dig too much
into the past. It should only be dealt with as the safest thing that we have; nobody
can take it away from us.
The past has already been lived. Therefore we should only take out of it what
has given us meaning and has enriched our lives to help us, in the present, to gain
strength for successful coping with the demands of life. The past not only contains
what has been good and pleasant and given meaning to our lives, but it also
enables us to learn from the mistakes we made and to search for ways to atone for
them in the present. We are able to mend our ways and to exploit the experience
gained to create something positive in our present lives.
The essence of existence is to grow beyond one’s self. People are closeted in a
narrow world and cannot perceive what exists beyond this world. Yet, in this
world, there are opportunities to make life meaningful. One can realize values,
both immediate and eternal. These values seem to be waiting for the individual to
come and grasp them, to use the opportunity for their realization. If one misses
what life is offering, the opportunity passes and is wasted and the values remain
unrealized.
People must take personal responsibility for their one and only life and for
their unique role, their personal mission, on the Earth. People who find
themselves lacking this cognition become weak and vulnerable in difficult
situations and then resemble a mountain climber in the Alps who gets stuck in
dense fog, cannot see the goal in front of him, and is in danger of collapse and loss
of his strength. But, when the fog lifts and he can see a shelter in the mountain
that he can reach, his strength is renewed and he is able to continue his effort.
In The Doctor and the Soul (1986), Frankl wrote about one of his clients who
told him that she could not find any sense to her life and did not want to get well.
If she had an occupation or role that could give her satisfaction, “everything
would be different.” For example, if she were a doctor or a nurse or a scientist
discovering some new and valuable medicine, she would be happy. “I had to
educate her,” says Frankl, “that it is not the occupation that is important, but how
we fulfill our roles” (p. 128).
Meaning is not dependent on a concrete role, but on ourselves, in what we are
doing in our unique existence and in the unique opportunities, given to us by our
work, to make life meaningful.
This client of Frankl’s did not understand that the work of a doctor or a nurse
can be boring and very unpleasant at times. What makes the work of the therapist
valuable in the eyes of the clients is not necessarily the professional knowledge
that the therapist has. This knowledge is taken for granted by the consumers.
The doctor or the nurse who remains a decent human being despite all limiting
circumstances is truly valued. And in order to be such a person, the therapist must
fill his or her role with human content. Exhibiting kindness toward the client,
caring for his or her well-being, and giving a smile and a kind word has no eco-
nomic value, only a human one, give life its meaning and uniqueness. Despite the
value that people place on the work role, this client needed to understand that
work is just one of the roles in a person’s life by which meaning can be found and
that she could realize her uniqueness in many other ways.
gain, such as gaining power for the sake of superiority, but it is the central aim
in life.
Hiroshi Takashima, a Japanese physician, has presented a fourth dimension:
the functional dimension. Takashima has successfully incorporated and employed
Frankl’s theory and method of logotherapy in his medical treatment and has
shown the benefits accrued to medicine and to the individuals concerned from
this approach. According to Takashima, in diagnosis and treatment, we have to
consider all four dimensions.
In Humanistic Psychosomatic Medicine (1984), he wrote that sickness can begin
in one of the four dimensions and influence the others. For example, an ulcer can
be an organic illness and cause disturbance in the functional dimension. A correct
diagnosis of the dimension in which the illness originates is necessary, along with
an assessment of how the rest of the dimensions are affected. Thus there is a need
to combine psychotherapy, medications, and logotherapy (meaning-oriented
psychotherapy) to modify a client’s attitude toward his or her illness.
Takashima used the metaphor of an orchestra to illustrate his approach to
medicine and to the four human dimensions: he compared the instruments of
the orchestra to the somatic dimension and the technical skill of the musicians
to the functional dimension. The musicians’ minds were analogous to the
psychological dimension, and the conductor symbolized the spiritual dimension,
because the conductor translates the spirit of the composer to the orchestra
(Takashima, p. 24).
Takashima included in his book many cases to illustrate the working of the
functional dimension. I have selected one that is characteristic of his attitude, as a
physician, toward people in his care. In this case, he tells about a manager of a
supermarket and coffeehouse who turned to him for help, complaining that he
limped on his left leg. This limping had started three months ago, yet it was
confined only to his workplace. Outside the office, he could walk without limping,
climb steps, and take part in various sport activities. Only in his work during the
day did he limp.
This patient was seen and tested by many doctors, including psychiatrists and
neurologists, and no evidence was found of physical or neurological factors or
causes for the limping. Takashima asked the patient when the limping had started.
He answered that it was when his boss has reprimanded him because of a mistake
he made. When he returned to his office after that, he bumped his left leg against
a chair and fell; all of the treatments that he received were of no avail.
Takashima asked the patient to walk for a while in his presence, and the
patient indeed limped with his left leg. “Then I said to him,” Takashima tells, “try
to limp on both legs.” “No jokes,” said the patient, and he did not try to limp.
Instead, he walked well—without limping on either leg. This patient saw that,
when he tried to limp on purpose on his right leg, he could not limp on his left
leg. Then he tried harder to limp on his left leg, but he couldn’t. Takashima asked
this patient to return to the office and try to limp on his left leg on Mondays,
Wednesdays, and Fridays and on his right leg on Tuesdays and Thursdays. The
Life as a Task 77
patient laughed. Several days later he phoned Takashima and told him that he
was sorry that he could not fulfill the doctor’s order, because he had forgotten
how to limp (pp. 91–92).
This was a case of functional disease with an unknown cause, yet it was treated
successfully with Frankl’s paradoxical intention, a method of treatment that
Frankl described and presented in detail in a chapter of his first book, The Doctor
and the Soul (1986, pp. 221–252).
In our times many people in their second half of life live only for the hour:
they tend to see the concept of here and now literally, as a call to grab as much
from the pleasures of life as possible. These people live a life of care for their
wealth but forget to care for their time. Their money cannot help them when the
time comes to depart from this world, and their days are not returning as they
wish. But those who make the necessary effort and find meaningful tasks for
themselves, those who occupy themselves in activities that bring joy to others, see
a blessing in their work and gain satisfaction and happiness in their lives.
This page intentionally left blank
9
If fate overcomes you, don’t run away! Don’t throw away your armament, and don’t
search for shelter, for fate will get you everywhere. Instead, search for a place and for
a task that will be useful to others. (Seneca, 1997, p. 22)
79
80 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
something or someone. Thus, for example, the division of the land among the
twelve tribes of Israel after its capture from the Canaanites by Joshua was done by
casting fates (Joshua: 8–12).
Fate occupies a central subject in two of the twenty-four books in the Old
Testament, in the books of Jonah and Ester, and it signifies a double role: on the
one hand, fate shows how insignificant humans are against the power of God, and,
on the other, fate is clothed as chance happening to someone.
In the book of Jonah, fate is mentioned in various contexts. First, the sailors
cast fates to see who is guilty of causing the storm that threatened to sink their
boat, in which Jonah wished to escape from the mission that God gave him to
fulfill. Fate appears to Jonah a second time when, instead of being drowned in the
storm, he is swallowed by a great whale. When Jonah is tossed from the whale’s
belly onto the land, he fulfills God’s command, but even then he must first taste
suffering in order to understand that his protest against God’s command is
useless: human beings are only tools in the hands of God and their revolt against
the fate meted out to them will not help them.
Jonah’s story is just one illustration of the concept of fate. Another is told in the
book of Ester: Haman, chief advisor to the king of Persia, casts a stone (fate) to
decide on which day of the month the Jews of ancient Persia will be killed. Fate,
however, intervenes and turns his wishes upside down: Rather than killing all of
the Jews as he has intended, he is hanged, along with his sons.
Sometimes fate serves a different purpose from the one originally intended.
The Bible uses the Hebrew word inah (coincidence), as in the case of a murderer
who happened to kill someone by chance or mistake because God had chanced it
to happen. The ancient people of Israel were aware of this turn of fate and erected
special towns and places where such a murderer could find refuge to save his life
from vengeance by the family of the murdered man.
In the book of Judges there is a story about Yiftach, the Israeli general, and his
vow to kill the first person he met if he came home victorious. He meets his own
daughter. This story is another example of the double meaning of fate in the
Bible. In the cases of Jonah and Yiftach, the reader cannot escape the feeling that
fate makes a mockery with them. Fate in its biblical use gives a reason to achieve
something or some purpose. But this purpose is hidden from the one who serves
as the subject of fate. Heroes in the Bible do the very things against which they
are warned and consequently pay the price.
Fate is used in literature much as in the Bible. In a book by the Israeli writer
Meir Shalev, the hero is running away from the fate that he knows awaits him. He
is afraid that he will die young and in strange circumstances, like the men in his
family. Fate intervenes at times in human life and shakes people up with such a
force that afterward their whole life and attitude to the world are changed. This is
what happens in Thomas Mann’s Magic Mountain (1955), in which the hero,
stricken with tuberculosis, is living in a sanatorium away from reality and slowly
sinks into a dream world. He awakens only when the World War I shakes him up
and puts him back on his feet and face-to-face with reality.
On Fate and Meaningful Living 81
Szondi’s interest in fate analysis began early in his life, seventeen years before
Sigmund Freud published his essay “Dostoyevsky and Patricide” in 1928. At that
time, in 1911, Szondi was an avid reader of the novels written by this famous
Russian writer, and he asked himself: “Why did Dostoyevsky choose murderers
and saints to serve as heroes in his books?” His answer later served as a
breakthrough to his new theory of psychoanalysis. Szondi found that Dostoyevsky
knew how to describe the souls of his heroes and their inner worlds, because he
himself carried, as genetic family inheritance, the same traits and characteristics,
and Dostoyevsky projected these traits onto the heroes in his books. Szondi also
assumed that great writers include in their books the genes that they inherited and
the contents of their instinctual worlds, without being aware of this unconscious
process in their writing. Szondi was so convinced about the truth of his new
theory that he had the courage to publish it. The responses that he received were
almost equally divided: there were those who perceived his theory as true, and
others who rejected it as complete nonsense.
A similar thing happened to Szondi’s famous book, Analysis of Marriages,
which was published in 1937. At that time he was already convinced that the
responses to this book were connected to only one thing, namely, that this book
touched on something deep and basic in the soul and psychological makeup of
human beings. Therefore he decided to develop his discovery further and to
devote his life to the theory of fate analysis.
Szondi’s initial feeling about Dostoyevsky was verified in 1947 when the French
author Henri Troyat published his biography on Dostoyevsky: Troyat showed that
the family of Dostoyevsky, which dated back to the sixteenth century, included
many soldiers, priests, and judges, but also thieves and murderers.
The same thing happened to Szondi with Balzac, in whose books one can find
a murderer who serves as a literary expression of Balzac’s own family
unconscious, which is discussed in more detail later in this book.
There were other incidents in Szondi’s own family, such as the sickness of his
mother and eldest brother, as well as in the families of his patients, that
strengthened Szondi’s belief in his assumptions about fate. His older brother
served as his model. This brother studied medicine in Vienna but didn’t finish
his studies because he married a blond German Aryan woman, became a father,
and remained unhappy all of his life.
Szondi participated as a frontline medic in World War I and was almost killed
when a bullet hit the spade in his backpack. He decided that his escape from death
was a sign that he must finish his studies in medicine and help the sick and the
suffering. Afterward he arrived at a military hospital in Vienna with an infection
in his liver. There he met a blond Aryan woman and fell in love with her. One
night he woke up in great anxiety because he dreamed about his family discussing
the unhappy life of his older brother because of that unfortunate marriage. Szondi
woke up with the feeling that he was going to repeat the mistake of his brother. He
wanted, however, to live his own fate, rather than to repeat what had already
happened. This was the moment when Szondi resented his genetic fate and
On Fate and Meaningful Living 83
decided to choose his selected fate instead. Following this incident, he began to
develop his concept of the family unconscious.
Another incident that strengthened Szondi’s decision to study fate’s influence
on human behavior was connected to one of his patients, who brought his wife to
Szondi for therapy because of the fears she had that she might poison herself and
her family. Szondi told the husband of this woman that her case was rather similar
to that of an older woman who had been in therapy for many years because of the
same fears. When Szondi described her physically, the husband exclaimed that she
was his mother. Szondi was disturbed by the question of why this man had chosen
a woman with the same family history and fears. The answer that he arrived at
only strengthened his resolution to develop his theory further.
The importance of spiritual fate becomes evident in the theory of Szondi when
he speaks about those who succumb to their fate, those who suffer from fate that
is forced on them. These people are incapable of resisting the opposing forces in
their instinctual fate and the environmental influences acting on them.
Many people suffer throughout their lives from the fate that they have
inherited from their ancestors. They lack the ego and spiritual strength to
overcome what they need in order to prevail over the compelling forces in their
inheritance. And they are incapable of choosing, from the many possibilities that
are open before them, a single piece of individual and private life. They are sick
because the functions of their faith are paralyzed.
In Man’s Search for Meaning (1962), Frankl has shown that faith is directed
toward the future. Szondi concurs with this direction. The spiritual fate of the
human being is capable of turning a person into a real human being. The strength
of functional faith and its quality are dependent on the strength of the ego in
terms of its libido, mental energy, interests, and the social environment. If the ego
disperses its energy to satisfy the instincts, its chances of getting sick are great.
And, in order to prevent mental illness, the ego needs to give control to the spirit
rather than to matter, and only faith can help the ego attain that function.
and homo humanisator are two concepts that, more than anything else, express
Szondi’s faith in humankind. Both stations can be achieved by human beings
whose faith, in the spiritual sense, in a loving human collective means liberation
from the confines of their instinctual nature and from the loneliness of self-love
(Szondi, 1996b, p. 60). In summing up Szondi’s work, one is struck by the duality
of human nature: forced fate versus selected fate. Szondi claims that we can
continue to adhere to our murderous inclinations, as contained in Cain’s fate
(Szondi, 1987), or we can use our conscience to recognize this tendency to sin and
contradict it, to bring about the transformation to Moses. The tendency to kill is
as old as human history, and therefore it is ever present. But the recognition of sin
in the human soul has also been present from ancient times. Human beings can
lead a life in which they aim to become like Moses, who struggled with his Cain’s
spirit and with sin and came out glorious, because he turned his murderous past
into the highest achievement that a human being can attain: to become the
founder of law and morals.
Szondi’s theory and therapy are controversial to this day. An interesting
illustration of this controversy is found in two letters that were sent to him
sixteen years apart. The first letter was written by Sigmund Freud, and the second
by Thomas Mann. The letters were sent to Szondi as replies to copies of his book
Analysis of Marriages (1937). Freud’s reply, two years before his death in London
in 1939, was not particularly friendly and contained several objections to Szondi’s
book. Freud emphasized that psychoanalytic experience has brought to the sur-
face many kinds of love; he ended his letter by stating that the factor that Szondi
emphasized in his book—the genetic attraction as expressed in the family
unconscious—may play a role without being exclusive or the standard.
The second letter was sent to Szondi by Thomas Mann, the famous writer, on
October 23, 1953, from a place near Zurich in Switzerland. Mann perceived Szondi’s
book as a meaningful gift that had occupied him a great deal. On the subject of
choosing one’s parents, mentioned by Szondi, Mann wrote that this may be a hypoth-
esis, and he cited Schopenhauer, who said that this could be different. Summing up
the analysis of Szondi’s book, Mann wrote that people’s fate is what they want to
become; he ended his letter to Szondi with some kind and generous words of praise.
In sum, fate for Szondi is a chain of decisions: some of them are done
consciously, but the bulk of them are unconscious. Yet, even when a decision is made
unconsciously, it is always a matter of choice. The essence of Szondi’s theory is that
we should turn our unconscious decisions into conscious ones; that is, we have to
take our fates into our own hands instead of passively accepting it. One’s fate is not
something that needs to be accepted humbly. One can give it direction.
and the third is man’s disposition and situation that together make up a man’s
psychological fate.” The last form, psychological fate, is connected to taking a
spiritual and free stand toward the events in one’s life. Frankl wrote, “toward these
man takes a position, that is, he forms an attitude. The position taken is in
contrast to the basically destined position given—a matter of free choice. Proof of
this is the fact that man can change his position. Man can take another
attitude”(Frankl, 1986, p. 80).
This quote from Frankl underlies the concepts of forced fate and selected fate in
a logotherapeutic perspective. As for forced fate, Frankl cites the case of identical
twins that were separated for many years. Yet when one of them developed paranoia,
the other, who lived in a distant city, sent a letter “which betrayed a delusion identi-
cal in content to his twin’s paranoia.” Frankl says that here was destiny indeed: the
identical twins had developed from the same germ cell, had the same fundamental
disposition, and developed the same mental disease (Frankl, 1986, p. 81).
There is no need to be an identical twin in order to have a forced fate. Frankl said:
“The man who believes his fate is sealed is incapable of repealing it” (Frankl, 1986,
p. 81). Forced fate and selected fate are issues with which we have to deal many times
during a long life. Illustrations taken from Frankl’s own life refer to his story as a Jew
and as a human being. Frankl had a forced fate, literally, when he was sent to
Auschwitz, and when his manuscript on existential analysis was forcibly taken from
him and lost, along with everything else that he possessed except his life. Frankl
could have resigned himself to that fate, but instead he used his own freely selected
fate and reconstructed this book on scraps of paper, which later became his
groundbreaking work, The Doctor and the Soul: from Psychotherapy to Logotherapy
(Frankl, 1986).
The second story, also taken from the life of Frankl, refers to the time when he
suffered a heart attack during a visit to Munich when he was old. His reaction to
the situation at the intensive care unit of the hospital is a beautiful example of
selected fate, as told by Lukas (1986), because he showed more than courage.
Frankl showed what is written in St. Francis’s prayer: “Give me my Lord that
instead of being consoled, I shall console; instead of being understood, that I shall
understand; and instead of being loved, that I shall love; for only in the giving we
receive.” Lukas recounts that Frankl, gravely ill, consoled, comforted, and gave her
courage: “He didn’t think of himself, he thought of me!” (p. 139). Frankl showed
a personal example of logotherapy’s application in real life.
to color their perception. It tends to alter their self-image, their attitude to self,
family, work, and society. And it tends to push many such people into despair.
Therefore, changing these people’s attitudes—from preoccupation with their
misery to a wish to be of service to others, to those less fortunate than
themselves—and redirecting their mental energy to discover new meaning in life
are the logotherapeutic answers for these people. Frankl wrote: “The destiny a per-
son suffers has a twofold meaning: to be shaped where possible and to be endured
where necessary” (Frankl, 1986, p. 111).
Logotherapy offers a means for attaining both. Frankl not only developed the
theory and philosophy of logotherapy, he also introduced several methods and tech-
niques to help suffering people. Two cases for illustration are briefly presented in the
following discussion. The first is told by Frankl (1986) in The Doctor and the Soul.
A famous lawyer learned that his leg had to be amputated because of arte-
riosclerosis. The operation took place in the hospital where Frankl worked at that
time. The healing went well, and the time came for the patient to make the first
step on one leg. The patient got up from the bed and began jumping in the room
and soon collapsed in Frankl’s arms. He burst into tears, claiming that he would
not be able to bear life as a cripple, that life had lost meaning for him in this
condition, whereupon Frankl looked into his eyes and asked him if he was serious
about making a career as a short or long distance runner. The patient looked at
Frankl surprised, and Frankl said to him that, in this case and only then, could he
understand the patient’s despair, because then it would really be meaningless to
live further. But for someone who has spent his life meaningfully and has gained
a solid reputation in his profession to lose the meaning of life just because he lost
a leg is incomprehensible. The patient understood at once, and a smile crept up
on his tearful face (p. 282).
This is a case that required not only endurance, but the shaping of a new life
for the patient. And to achieve both, Frankl made use of the self-distancing power
of humor, the main ingredient in paradoxical intention, a technique and method
of treatment that Frankl first published in 1939. This method has been used in
psychotherapy ever since, with considerable success.
In logotherapy the concept of fate is exchanged for destiny. Although fate
is blind to values and limited to concrete events beyond our control, destiny is
connected to the way in which we respond to what happens to us. Destiny expresses
the order of events and their understanding. According to logotherapy, it is possible
to overcome fate by the specifically human ability of self-transcendence. This
ability is part of the spiritual dimension that is unique to human beings. Fate in
Szondi’s theory is the opposite of freedom in Frankl’s theory. The spiritual dimension
signifies freedom from genetic inheritance and instincts and even from physical
and social environments. It denotes the human ability to accept or to reject the
limitations of those factors. In Frankl’s attitude to freedom, it is up to human
beings to decide how they wish to live their lives.
Instead of speaking about fate, Frankl prefers to speak about faith, for the latter
is directed to the future. Without faith (not necessarily religious faith), there is no
On Fate and Meaningful Living 89
meaning to psychotherapy. A therapist who does not believe in the client’s ability
to change his or her attitude toward someone or something cannot fulfill the
helping and caring roles and functions of a therapist. Frankl rejects a fatalistic
attitude to life. He emphasizes that human beings have “response-ability”; that is,
they have the ability to choose their responses to what happens to them, even in
the worst conditions.
Frankl agrees with Szondi that fate belongs to all of us human beings, like the
soil on which we walk, but this soil serves as a jumping board to freedom. One is
not dependent on fate, and certainly not on forced fate, claims Frankl. On the con-
trary, one can always decide how to respond to fate. This response is dissimilar to
Szondi’s selected fate. One has basic freedom to take fate as a given that requires a
decision, along with responsibility and determination, even against fate.
The life of a human being is a constant struggle between inner and outer
powers of fate. Yet, despite the importance of fate, the starting point should be the
freedom that exists even in the most severe cases of pathology. This freedom is
expressed in the attitude that people take toward what is happening to them.
Biological fate is like material that is open to structuring. Shaping and structuring
are its aims. We can meet people who show us that it is possible to overcome
biological givens and physiological shortcomings. People are capable of achieving
great deeds with their spirits when they are willing to give their maximum energy
to a certain cause.
they were forced to participate in the struggle for satisfying their most basic needs
while trying to keep their human image. And in the third phase, when the
incarcerated prisoners were freed from the physical and mental pressures and
from all of the fears and terrifying conditions that surrounded them, the danger
that awaited was the loss of identity through an inability to be happy for their life.
Life in the concentration camp brought about the deformation of the human
soul and apathy about everything, except the physiological need to eat and to find
a bit of warmth. The sexual instincts did not work because of malnutrition, and
lack of food caused dreams and endless talks about meals. The way to deal with
these inhuman conditions was always subjective. There were inmates who were
capable of overcoming their anger and apathy, who knew how to sacrifice even
their last piece of bread, and there were others who became like beasts. The latter
were usually the Capos—the work supervisors who were selected from among the
prisoners. Thus, even in the sociological fate that was forced on the inmates, they
could choose their personal reaction and attitude to the social environment in
which they found themselves.
Frankl emphasized that neurotic symptoms are not only the result of
something physiological or of a mental-emotional expression, but also a form of
existence, and this is crucial. Hunger and lack of sleep, which are physiological
conditions, and inferiority, which is a mental condition, are, in their essence, spir-
itual standpoints. In any situation, people are endowed with the ability to make
their decisions, to decide whether they are in favor or against their social, mental,
and physical environment. Only those who forwent their spiritual supports before
entering the camp failed under the influence of their surroundings.
Logotherapy offers ways to cope with forced fate. These ways are based on the
logotherapeutic technique called change in attitude. The purpose of this
technique is to help clients gain a new attitude toward the harm done to them.
The goal is to change a negative and mentally unhealthy attitude to life into a
healthy and positive one.
There are four ways to achieve this goal that are offered the client: the first
includes the notion that to adopt a positive attitude to the blow of fate is a
tremendous human achievement. The second is to show the client something
meaningful that is included in the suffering, despite the blow. The need to turn the
client’s attention from what has been lost to what remains—to what is whole and
has not been harmed by fate—is the third way. And adopting a philosophical
standpoint or a religious perspective on life that can help carry the burden of
suffering is the fourth way.
An illustration is the case of a sixty-five-year-old widow who lost her husband
after a long battle with cancer. She felt herself useless in the world, and she could
have easily fallen into depression and despair.
The first phase in the treatment was to help her see in that forced fate had
brought not only a disaster but an opportunity to discover new meaning to her
life. After this phase was accomplished, the time came to find the meaning hidden
in the suffering. The client was told that suffering without meaning is dangerous
92 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
and superfluous, and the meaning that she could find in her situation meant
seeing life in a different light, to understand that her suffering was not in vain. On
the contrary; it could strengthen her spiritually and cause her to continue living
for new goals, instead of the care that she gave to her husband during his illness.
The therapeutic discussion laid the foundation for the next phase in the
treatment. Work in that phase concentrated on making an inventory of what has
remained whole and could serve as basis for her new life: her family, her economic
resources, her friends, and her own strong personality. When this client accepted
the fact that she had reasons to live, she was able to free herself from her deep
mourning.
People who suffer from the blows of fate can find a cure for their suffering
and pain by applying logotherapy’s philosophy, principles, and attitude to life,
as presented earlier in this book. The human spirit is capable of remaining
healthy, even in a damaged body. Those who have experienced a loss of
something that was meaningful for them in their previous life can relate to the
blow of fate that befell them as something beyond their control. They can
change their attitude to this event and continue to move forward on the path of
life, find new meaning to their existence, and be cured mentally. The specifically
human capacity of saying yes to life and the defiant spirit of the human being
(in the logotherapeutic sense) are two of the most important armaments in an
older person’s struggle for survival.
10
I knew seventy-year-old Mr. Smith (not his real name) for a long time prior to his
retirement as a happy man. Mr. Smith had a good job in public service where he
was esteemed and respected by his co-workers. He was also respected by his large
family, his many children, and his grandchildren. His physical health was excellent
also. Mr. Smith was regarded by his neighbors and many friends as an easy-going
fellow and a lucky man. Then we lost contact for several years.
When I met him again, I was surprised to discover a different Mr. Smith from
the one I had known. He was dejected, meek, and restless. When I asked him what
happened, he could not answer my question logically. His physical health had not
changed, he said, but his mental health was badly shaken since he had become a
retired person. Mr. Smith could have been a happy fellow. He knew that many
people would gladly change places with him. Yet, he said, something was missing.
However, he did not know what was missing. Was it the work he did previously?
No. Did something bad happen to the family? No, everything there was okay. Was
his fortune gone? Not at all. But that something was nagging him and he felt close
to despair.
Mr. Smith’s case is not unique in our days. Similar cases are reported by many
elderly people. People are not content with physical existence alone. They are born
to work, but their work may be different from one phase of life to the next. One
of the paradoxes in life is that people who are conscious of their existence and try
to escape social pressures by turning to conformity, instead of being happy about
their freedom, are sometimes caught by anxiety, dread, and depression and exhibit
a pessimistic outlook on life.
When normal and balanced, life is a synthesis between personal and universal
ingredients of freedom and discipline, spirituality and binding values, existence
and essence. When this living synthesis is broken, one of the ingredients
dominates the others and causes damage to the entire system.
93
94 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
Kierkegaard published part of his works under a pseudonym, fearing that his
attack on the Christian Church would result in very serious retaliation. The bulk
of his writings revolve around the idealistic and absolute demands made of a
Christian at the highest level. These demands are emphasized in his books:
Either/Or (1971), Fear and Trembling (1954), The Concept of Dread (1991), and
elsewhere. He also maintained that despair is sin, but its opposite is faith. His
works became known throughout Europe thanks to two German professors, each
of whom made a name for himself in philosophy: Karl Jaspers (1883–1969) and
Martin Heidegger (1889–1976). These professors helped make Kierkegaard’s
works well-known and provided new explanations.
According to Kierkegaard (1993), lack of faith leads to despair, and this despair
is a mortal illness that kills human beings. This despair is worse than any physical
illness, because it involves the death of the spirit, and this death is terrible for
human beings, who spiritual in their essence. Thus this illness is the illness of the
self, or a pathological attitude to oneself. And this attitude to the self is known as
despair, which, for a Christian, is a sin.
People fall into despair as a result of worldly, eternal, and personal factors, and the
anxiety that follows despair is like the “dizziness of the heights of freedom.” This
despair stems from what the desperate person sees as the gap and distance between
what is and what ought to be. This is a despair that resembles a deep gorge filled with
depression, melancholy, and dejection. The following case illustrates this feeling.
Mrs. Leroy (not her real name), aged seventy-one, agreed to see a logotherapist
mainly to “get rid of her children’s nagging.” She was a survivor of a great disaster
and lived alone in the northern part of the country. In the discussions that she had
with the therapist, she disclosed that she lived with a depressing feeling that “she
had missed her life.” As a young girl, she wanted to be an actress and dreamed
about a great career. She was endowed with the necessary means for her wish: a
slim figure, prettiness, intelligence, a quick wit, and great imagination.
Unfortunately, she said, she made a big mistake. After emerging from the disaster
that swept over the community in which she lived and getting back on her feet,
she married a much older man, whom she adored, and had to relinquish her
dream. Her marriage lasted forty years and ended in the death of her husband.
During this long time she seemed outwardly happy and satisfied, but when alone
with herself, she was unhappy. Mrs. Leroy was afraid to admit that she had made
a big mistake when she refused to listen to her conscience, which had told her not
to accept his proposal of marriage, and she suffered a lot from her “pangs of
conscience.” And now, she repeated over and over: “It is late. Life has passed and I
am in mourning not only for my husband but mainly for myself.”
despair that is within the soul of the human being. And this despair hits us at
times with an anxiety that is impossible to explain. This despair is characteristic
of older people who have failed to achieve wholeness by accepting their lives.
According to research in aging, many older people are living in this state.
Many older people are not aware of their spiritual condition and believe that
they are in despair. Many others think that they are in despair when, in actuality,
they are not. Only the well-trained professional in medicine, psychiatry,
psychotherapy, or social work can differentiate between the two kinds of despair.
People can pretend and play at being in despair, and they can mix despair with all
kinds of symptoms, both bodily and mental. Yet, although these may pass without
resulting in despair, the pretension itself is the real despair.
Despair is different from a physical illness in that there is no need to feel sick
in order to be in despair. Feeling ill is a sure sign of illness, and someone who has
never felt ill is the one who is in despair. Anybody can claim that he or she is in
despair without playing games or pretending. Such a person is closer to regaining
health than the one who says that he or she is free of despair.
The fact that this illness, this despair, is hidden is a catastrophe. Despair can
dwell inside a person in such a way that it is impossible to discover. Despair can
hide in people at such depths that they cannot know about its existence. On the
other hand, whoever believes has the best medication against this poison called
despair. This medication is the possibility that, by faith, all things are open and
may be obtained any minute. The fatalist is in despair and, as such, has lost the
self; everything is perceived by him or her as necessary.
Kierkegaard perceived human beings as a synthesis between the finite and the
infinite, the temporary and the eternal, freedom and necessity. The synthesis is the
relationship between these elements. This synthesis, however, is not the full
human being. When people relate to themselves consciously, they gain their own
self. And when they do not realize their synthesis or misunderstand it, they fall
into despair. This despair is an indication that a person does not want to be
himself or herself. This refusal to be one’s own self is what Kierkegaard calls sin.
the Soul (1986), which was originally published in 1946. What Frankl originally
termed existential vacuum was the feeling of a lack of understanding and doubts
about the meaning of life and lack of interest in it. This feeling of emptiness is
characterized by lack of self-assurance about finding meaning in life. This feeling
in itself is not an illness, but, if it persists without medical or therapeutic
intervention, it may end in despair.
Existential vacuum can emerge in any individual, irrespective of social
standing, gender, occupation, or religion—as opposed to an animal, which acts in
accordance with its drives and instincts. These are insufficient for humans to serve
as guides, because they have deteriorated in the nature of biology. Even religious
tradition cannot serve this purpose, for most human beings are not religious in
the traditional sense. Thus many people do not know what they want and are
willing to satisfy themselves with what other people want or with what their
leaders want and to follow them without thinking.
Logotherapy emphasizes the importance of gaining distance from symptoms
that cause mental anguish. This self-distancing is needed to lighten the feeling of
despair. Logotherapy maintains that people can distance themselves from harmful
symptoms by emphasizing the values that exist, despite the despair, and these can
help them overcome the loss. The mourning of Mrs. Leroy is not a mental
disturbance, but a normal psychological function. At the same time, it is also an
opportunity for discovering new meaning in life. We may speak of mental distur-
bance only in cases in which the mourning lasts too long, or at least far beyond
what is commonly accepted in a given culture as normal mourning, or when that
mourning prevents a return to day-to-day life.
When this existential vacuum remains empty, it may fill itself with despair,
and the result may be destructive to the mental health of the individual. Frankl
related to this kind of despair as one that gives preference to one value over
another, so that this value gets absolute control of other feelings and values.
These people usually fall into despair. Lukas (1986a) said that these people also
tend toward fanaticism, jealousy, and intolerance toward those who belong to the
other group.
People in the group of parallel values are far better equipped for living; they
have many values that give meaning to their lives. And if one value should get lost
or disappear, others can serve as substitutes for the lost one.
People in both groups can find meaning in their lives. There are people in
doubt about the meaning of their lives without necessarily being sick. Yet, the
strength of despair is greater among people in the first group, especially when
the loss is perceived as a tragedy. For these people, the danger of suicide is more
evident, and they should be helped by professionals.
using their thoughts, imagination, and memories. In this method of therapy, one
disregards the symptom and uses the energy left to do or get something useful for
others. The vicious circle cannot be cut by self-pity or by self-hate. Healing comes
as a result of one’s commitment to enlarge the circle of meaning, to enrich life.
Sometimes clients accuse others for their own failings, saying that such and
such a thing happened to them in their childhood, for example, that prompted
them to reject the road to responsibility and to become dependent physically or
psychologically on substances and on various people. Then the role of the thera-
pist is to turn this “because” into “despite”: that is, clients must say to themselves
that despite the abandonment experienced in their childhood by their parents—
as a result of war, disaster, or any other calamity—and despite lack of support in
their struggle for survival, they can show themselves and the world that they are
capable of living normally and decently.
In cases of depression and other acute illnesses and negative life events, the role
of the therapist is to help clients learn that it is possible to let the waves of life roll
over their heads. As long as clients are under the waves, so to speak, they cannot
see the horizon. And without seeing the horizon, they are not ready to think about
the search for meaning in their life.
The importance of meanings and values in times of despair and doubt in terms
of helping people withstand the vicissitudes of life has paved the way for many
innovations in psychotherapeutic intervention. Among these techniques, that of
appealing to the human dignity of a person has been developed and used with
impressive results by Lukas (1986b). The technique rests on the power of sugges-
tion. As such, it is contradictory to the logotherapeutic value of free will. Freedom
of the will means respecting clients’ rights to decide how they wish to lead their
lives, to choose their own way. The logotherapist uses the appealing technique
only in cases in which the noetic (spiritual) dimension is temporarily blocked.
We can stay well, Lukas (1986b) says, by using our will power to stabilize our
emotional state. Psychosomatic medicine, as Takashima and Frankl have shown,
contains both possibilities and explanations for getting sick or for staying healthy
and well. If stress can be triggered in the psyche, it can also be prevented by the
psyche. The will to live and reach a certain goal strengthens the body’s capacity to
withstand illness and resist the forces of destruction. Gerontology literature often
includes stories of how very old and sick people cheat death by surviving “only
until my granddaughter gets married” or “only until Christmas.” These people
exhibit strength of will beyond the ordinary; they prove the significance of self-
transcendence for survival.
Ordinary people have shown repeatedly that a brave personal attitude toward
death and dying is dependent only on the person, and not on his or her
circumstances. The professional literature in social work and psychology is replete
with case illustrations about the use of this technique when dealing with people
in despair. Such people are in desperate need of a supporting hand, raising their
hopes for survival. Surprisingly, however, hope has not received much attention in
modern gerontology. Nevertheless, almost everybody knows that lack of hope can
100 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
lead to despair and even to suicide, especially among the old. Without hope,
without care, without direction, and without a reason to live for something or for
someone, a human being may lose interest in life. Enhancing clients’ hope and
using it to change maladaptive coping behavior can help them get rid of their
preoccupation with despair. The following case illustrates this point.
There are many old survivors of the Holocaust who live in despair. One of
these, whom I knew and cared for, was seventy-nine-year-old Mr. Green (not his
real name). He was sick with diabetes. He told me that “pretty soon” he would die.
“You see,” he said, “I am completely alone. My entire family perished in the
concentration camp. I myself was hardly able to survive and to escape death. As
long as I could take care of myself I did so, but now, who needs an old man?”
Before I could reply he added, “Who cares? Who cares for one old man?”
“Yes, perhaps you are right,” I said. “But, tell me, why you are still here? If you
are serious in what you said, you need company. You need people to share your
thoughts with, to listen to, from whom to hear that not only you had such horrible
and painful experiences. There are others who have experienced even worse things
and whose circumstances are more depressing than yours. It is important that you
hear that there are many happy occasions which they experience and these are
open for you too. Are you really serious about throwing away your life?” The old
man kept silent for a long while. Then he sighed and said, “Perhaps you are right.
I really didn’t think about the others. I was too busy with my own sorrow. You are
right. I know several survivors whose conditions are far worse than mine, people
hardly alive, and nevertheless they seem to be enjoying every minute, every
meeting with others. Perhaps I should join them.”
Part Two
Applied Aspects of
Meaningful Living in
Old Age
This page intentionally left blank
11
If many ways are closed for you, look at the vast fields of action still open before you
in which you can be useful to society. (Seneca, 1997, On Mental Calmness, p. 22)
Logotherapy relates to the world in many ways. Each of these is built on values
anchored in the culture in which one lives. In The Doctor and the Soul, Frankl
(1986) says that our values and our philosophical attitude to life give us a limited
perspective on the world, like a cross-section: The values that guide our lives are
related to the tasks that we are fulfilling. Life demands the use of spiritual
flexibility to use well the opportunities for finding meaning that are thrown in
our path.
According to logotherapy, there are at least twelve ways in which we can
discover and find meaning in our lives, some of which have already been
mentioned in this book. The first three, which these constitute Frankl’s original
and basic ways for finding meaning in life, will be explicated in detail and the rest
will be described briefly.
1. The passive way, which relies on personal experiences that one gains in
encounters with nature and other human beings.
2. The active way, which relies on human creativity and actions.
3. The attitudes we take toward the inevitable events in our lives.
4. The way of symbolic growth, meaning that some special life event or
experience causes us to undergo a very important change in our behavior that
may result in a feeling of spiritual growth.
5. The way of discovering our real being and understanding who we are and
what we want to be or to become.
6. The way of choice, meaning the use of our freedom to choose—from various
alternatives—the one that can give meaning to our lives.
103
104 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
7. The feeling that we are unique and different from other human beings, along
with the decision to use this uniqueness in the service of an ideal or for other
human beings.
8. The way of responsibility, the way of our intention to accept full responsibility
for our decisions.
9. The ability to transcend ourselves, above and beyond ourselves, in special
situations.
10. The ability to turn guilt feelings into a lever for doing something positive and
useful. (Chapter Eleven in this book is devoted to this important way.)
11. The ability to discover meaning in suffering and pain.
12. Accepting the fact that life is transitory and that we are the only creatures on
this Earth who are aware of their own deaths. This discovery should lead us
toward the reawakening of our responsibility toward life, rather than to the
denial of death’s existence.
example, as heavenly music. Music uplifts the soul. It creates a quest for beauty,
wonder, and grandeur that is difficult to express in words. Music fills the human
heart with hope, gives strength, power, and courage, and can push us to action. It
is hard to imagine someone, unless that person were completely deaf, whose eyes
would not fill with tears on hearing the “Choir of the Slaves” in Verdi’s opera
Nabucho.
Music enables us to accept our existence on this Earth more easily. It reminds
us that, despite everything, despite all of the troubles and calamities of life, there
is still beauty in the world, sense in life, and reason and meaning in suffering and
in the fight for survival. Music is the elixir for an aching heart.
Classical and popular music can awaken the heart, soul, and spirit and, via the
beauty of the sound, give new meaning to life. The same applies to religious
music, which can uplift the soul to heaven and fill the entire being with awe. For
many older people, music, and especially religious music, can be part of the
experiential world of values that Frankl described in some of his major works.
Today it is almost taken for granted that music has therapeutic powers for all
ages, but particularly for older people. Music can bring back long-forgotten
feelings and memories, open new vistas, and suggest new areas for meaningful
activities, even in advanced age.
social club based on the principles of logotherapy. The purpose was to enable the
older people to use their spiritual resources: to uplift their souls, safeguard their
human dignity, and strengthen their resolve to spend their remaining years in
dignity and creativity.
“Café Stockholm 84” (Fried, 1989) was used as a model for this quest. This
model of working with elderly survivors of the Holocaust, and with others as well,
has proved to be readily applicable. It is used today in many places, including a
social club for survivors in London (Hassan, 1992). The idea is to establish the
atmosphere of a Central European café, such as those that were well known in
pre–World War II Europe, all over this area of the world and elsewhere, with
which the survivors were familiar in their youth. Music plays an important role:
The participants sit, drink coffee, and listen to their favorite pieces of music. They
enjoy warm and supportive attention from the staff.
Many older people could not learn music in their youth or find time to enjoy
music because of the difficulties of providing for their families and growing
children. A creative idea employed in this club was bringing a volunteer musician
and conductor to teach the older people how to enjoy music. This musician came
once a week for the entire year, taught them various pieces of music that were
particularly meaningful for them, and explained and demonstrated these pieces
on the piano. The result was simply great. The music brought people together
and motivated them to contribute their own creativity for the same purpose. It
encouraged additional musicians to come and perform voluntarily before this
audience.
There were, in addition, lectures on music and singing and visits to the opera
and to concerts. The high point in these activities was forming a choir, which the
old survivors organized, conducted, and maintained. Participants emphasized
that they had gained an important and meaningful experience. The music they
heard, composed, nurtured and developed, along with the singing and the choir,
opened a new world for them, the world of meaningful experiences, and it
changed their entire lives.
presentations by writers, poets, and literary critics and who watch programs about
books and literature on television or listen to radio presentations.
Literature in its broadest sense offers approaches to cultural, psychological, and
social phenomena; it opens new ways to personal and professional connections. It
enables therapists and the aged to deepen their self-knowledge and to take a stand
against the variety of human problems with which it deals. Literature turns to the
social reality as an integral part of living and encompasses the worlds of many
generations and their relationships, including their complex perceptions and atti-
tudes to life. Literature enlightens the connections among the generations, deals
with the eternal problems of human beings, describes the struggle for survival and
for preserving dignity in old age, and provides new meaning to the concept of
mental health.
Literary creativity is not diminished with advancing age. Only in the roman-
tic myths developed during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries did some
people claim that creativity weakens with advancing years. Older writers, poets,
and philosophers are free of social conventions. They are aware of the opposing
forces in human life; they are aware of the tragic and the comic dwelling
together in the human soul. Important examples of this tragic co-existence are
found in works such as Cervantes’s Don Quixote, Voltaire’s Candide, and
Thomas Mann’s The Confessions of Felix Krull. In each of these works, emphasis
is placed on wisdom, morality, and the lessons that the young can acquire from
the older generation.
Literary creations are a special art and mystery that are ageless. In many literary
works, there is a revolt of the aged against the tyranny of youth. There is also a
serene acceptance of the facts of life. From the poverty that accompanies the aging
of many great writers and poets, great works of art are sometimes born. The
artistic achievement gives impetus for further struggle with the vicissitudes of life,
for creation and expression.
Many great works in literature were completed when their creators were old:
Cervantes was sixty-eight years old when he finished writing Don Quixote;
Tolstoy was eighty-eight when he wrote What Is Art?; Sigmund Freud was sixty-
seven when he published The Ego and the Id; and George Bernard Shaw was
sixty-eight when he completed the play Saint Johanna.
Engagement with literature does not need to be passive. Each older person
has a fascinating life story based on the simple fact that she or he has lived a long
life and has experienced many events, has had many successes and failures,
illnesses and accidents. What is particularly interesting in each such life review
is how the older person was able to survive and cope with difficulties.
A story based on real-life experiences is always fascinating. In such a tale, we
can detect worlds that are hidden from one that has no knowledge about them,
and in each there are opportunities for responding to life’s demand of all of us.
Writing enables people to perceive their life and the lives of others from a distance,
to discover hidden elements, to gain new understanding or at least a different one.
This understanding is both fascinating and painful.
108 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
fascinates and enchants the older man, and, in order to be near the beautiful boy,
he is ready to face ridicule, laughter, and derision. In the end, this man even falls
victim to the plague that spreads through the city.
This story reminds us that each individual has a dream that combines reality
with imagination, but not many older people are willing to take the risk of living
their dreams in actuality. The ones who dare may gain a wonderful gift, that of
discovering meaning in their lives.
A literary hero endowed with a courageous heart for realizing his dream and
erotic love for his beloved is the eighty-four-year-old “King of the Confection.”
Roman Gary’s (1980) unforgettable book The Dread of King Solomon describes
the old hero’s great love for Cora, his companion before the Nazi invasion of Paris,
and his search for her after the war ended. Cora was a well-known singer during
those times, but because of her association with a Nazi officer, she was shunned
and forgotten. Now, at age sixty-five, she lives in destitute circumstances. The King
himself—as is commonly known in the city—became rich from his thriving con-
fection business after the war and devoted his life to charity. He meets Jan, a young
taxi driver and jack-of-all trades and occupations, who serves as messenger for the
King and as deliveryman of the gifts and presents that the King sends regularly to
many needy aged people.
Gary describes the old man beautifully, with much love, as a forceful older
man, dressed in an elegant suit made of durable long-lasting cloth, who defiantly
visits the fortune teller to prove that he still has a future, exercises regularly, and is
looking in a matchmaker’s office for a long-lasting marriage, a partner in life.
Both elderly heroes are lonely people. Both are unhappy and suffering and they
desperately need each other. Jan, with his realistic attitude to life, understands
their loneliness and longing and arranges a meeting between the King and Cora.
This fateful meeting leads to the reunion of the former lovers and to the
blossoming of a great and enthusiastic love.
Love’s great power can withstand all of the vicissitudes of life and the vagaries of
fate. It is strong enough to hold during even the greatest storms and trials in life. The
hero is equipped with a strong yet sensitive character and is wise enough to do good
things for others while he is still able. The old hero in this moving book understands
that his wealth can buy almost anything, except what he yearns for—love.
The King is a model of healthy old age, the living example of logotherapy’s
attitude to life, a hero who Gary’s talent has breathed life into. This man
exemplifies Frankl’s own attitude to life, of saying yes to life despite all of the
limiting circumstances. This “despite” has great value for survival in old age, as
Gary tells us via his hero; he calls on all of us to emulate him.
repeat; the advice they give; and the love and kindness they bestow on the young
generation work in two ways. For their own children and grandchildren, they
enliven meaningful life events in the past. They also refresh family traditions and
enable the next generations to take part in their experiences, feelings, and
memories. They get recognition that they have something of value to pass on to
the younger generations.
Although some aging people are convinced that their children and grand-
children have no interest in those memories, because they are connected to a
different historical time, research on the next generation, and especially on
grandchildren, has shown that this is not true. Many elderly people kept their
memories hidden deep inside their souls. Today they know that they made a
mistake. Adult children and young grandchildren are interested to learn from
the past, especially about events related to their own extended family.
Oscar Wilde (1856–1900) wrote a beautiful story for children and adults called
The Selfish Giant (1990). In the story a giant chases away the children who are
playing in his garden and even builds a high wall to keep them out so that he can
hide from the world. But the giant gets punished; the garden remains empty and
forlorn. Without the children, spring refuses to come to his place. When the
children sneak back to the garden, everything fills with joy, laughter, and life.
The behavior of the giant resembles many aging people who, in their old age,
search for a place to stay alone and even erect walls around themselves. These walls
are not made of bricks and stones, yet, like real walls in the physical sense, they are
built for the same purpose—to keep others from entering their inner lives. When
people keep on building walls and strengthening them, there is a danger that they
will indeed keep the spring away, keep the joy of life away. In order to pull the
lonely old person out from his garden, physically and emotionally, there is a need
to renew his or her connections with the human (social) world.
The connection between the children and the giant resembles the connection of
the aging individual with the younger generations as it gradually turns into a con-
nection of mutual love. In a beautiful passage in the story that touches the heart,
Wilde tells us how the giant arrived at the decision to destroy the wall and let the
children freely enter the garden: When a small boy tried to climb on a tree and did
not succeed, the giant helped him, lifted the small boy, and placed him on a branch,
and suddenly his heart was filled with joy and love. This feeling was intensified
when the small boy put his arms around the giant’s neck and kissed him.
Generations are social units connected in a given historical time, in which there
are changes and continuity. Today there are many opportunities for finding
meaning in life by fostering better connections among the generations. Yet not
every individual knows how to use the opportunities that are open.
In the work of the South African writer, Ran Jacobson, for example, The Zulu
and the Zaide (Brody, 1995), the story focuses on an older white parent whose son
disregards his father’s need for love and care, and his place in the family is taken
over by a young black servant from the Zulu tribe. This servant is endowed with
wonderful sensitivity and tact and cares for the old father with devotion and
The Gifts of the Gods: Sources for Discovering Meaning in Life 111
kindness. The connection between them becomes stronger and stronger with each
passing year until the old man dies. The son learns too late what he has missed and
must live with his bad conscience throughout his life.
Love of a small child for an old man, not his grandfather, is the subject of a
story by the Israeli writer Nira Harel (1981). “Koby Knows” is a story about an old
man who cannot find the house he lives in and cannot remember the family name
of his son, who has changed his name from Polish to Hebrew. This old man is
called by the children in the neighborhood “Hayim Eyeglasses.” Koby is a lonely
child, the only son of a divorced mother who came to live in this neighborhood
not long ago and who, so far, has not adjusted to life in the new environment.
Hayim Eyeglasses has no grandchildren. Koby sees him as an old, weak, and
lost man. The old man arrived by mistake at the apartment of Koby. This mistake
created new meanings in the lives of these heroes in the story. The child adopts
Hayim Eyeglasses as his grandfather, and the old man gains a grandchild. They
need each other and together they complete each other’s lives.
Each generation must transfer to the next the strength for dealing with its own
aging. The strength of the old is expressed in wisdom, beginning with the
knowledge that has accumulated and ending with good judgment. When this
wisdom is spiced with spiritual energy and joy of life and combined with volun-
tary renunciation of all superfluous things, such as vanity and honors, some old
people can teach the younger generation how to age with dignity, without falling
into despair.
In the second half of life, Erikson (1964) says that people close the circle of
their life. This closing is not done linearly. Thus it points to the possibility of a new
beginning, to renewal. That renewal can happen in the second half of life.
Sometimes the same beginning is expressed as a return to the wonderful traits of
childhood: curiosity, joy of life, search for the magic and wonders of nature, and
discovery of their meaning. Some people may return to other traits, to the childish
ones—to dependency on others or to helplessness.
presented earlier in this book, describes with humor and irony the relationships
among the residents of an old-age home and their offspring in his novel The
Millions of Harlekin (1997).
Hrabal uses an old-age home as an allegory for life itself. A young physician on
the premises serves as son and grandson for the residents, bringing new spirit and
joy to the lives of the people there by playing classical music and songs that they
all know and are familiar with. They can even hum this music together. This
music, the “millions of Harlekin,” is played all day long, over and over, in every
room of the old-age home, and the young doctor recites some words from the
poem of Franz Liszt, the composer: “be careful with your words, for a rough word
truly hurts; and when you these pronounced; you already regretted. And your
heart aches, for you didn’t mean” (p. 140).
People can discover meaning in life and enjoy life in many ways: in work,
including volunteering, hobbies, and all kinds of creative activities. They can find
meaning in travels and hikes in nature, in gazing at the sunrise and the sunset, in
the stars and the sea, in lakes and forests. They can find meaning in the many
forms and expressions of art, music, dancing, drawing, sculpture, and writing.
And above all, they can find meaning in humor and laughter, of which more will
be said in the next chapter.
12
An old man was asked by his friend: “Tell me, what do you do now that you’ve
retired?” His friend answers, “Each morning the maid brings me a cup of tea and the
papers. I drink the tea very slowly and read all the obituaries. If my name is not
listed, I get up and go for a walk.” (Cohen, 1994, p. 368)
The power of humor and laughter as primary means for survival was already
noted by the ancient Greeks and Romans in many humorous plays, satires, and
poems used on various occasions in the theater and elsewhere. The Bible also
contains humor and laughter, but these instances are different from what is
commonly perceived as humor and what scholars see as such. In the Bible humor
is literary, circumscribed, assumed, and delicate; it requires the reader’s use of
imagination.
Humor and laughter are seen today as therapeutic, relaxing, and enjoyable
values that help people face difficulties, hardships, distress, stressful life situations,
and even calamities and traumas.
Attitude toward humor and laughter is always individualistic and subjective.
What makes one person burst into laughter is not necessarily so funny to another
human being. Cultural background, intellectual level, personal mood, and social
attitudes influence the perception of what is humoristic and laughable and
channel humor in commonly known and accepted ways in a given society, giving
it special character and characteristics.
Some people are quick witted and get the point of a joke in an instant. Others
need some time before they perceive what is so funny, and still others need an
explanation before they can understand the same joke. And there are the serious
ones who will not descend to this level because they have no sense of humor and
are afraid to admit it.
Having a sense of humor is such an important personal characteristic that
people are willing to accept many weaknesses and shortcomings—except the lack
113
114 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
all the rest of the months—that is, known materials, but in a different and original
form that unites the content and forms humor and laughter.
As for the means that the joke uses, Freud made a comparison of the joke with
the dream and saw that they have similar lines, despite differences. The similarities
include concentration and reduction, transference (in the Freudian sense), a
mistaken argumentation and reasoning, absurdity, double meaning, a multitude
of meanings, contrariness, and repeated use of the same material in its entirety or
partially (p. 58).
Freud also differentiated between naïve and purposeful jokes. The latter he
described as expressing forbidden contents, hostility, and vulgarity and as
enabling the satisfaction of an instinct, passion, or hostile feeling toward
something that blocks the way for these to act. They circumvent the block and,
along the way, produce enjoyment from the same source—access to which the
block has closed.
Freud was aware of the importance of logical mistakes included in the joke,
and he used these to show the unconscious intentions in human behavior. The
source of producing pleasure by humor is in the emotions. In his important essay
on the joke and its relationship to the unconscious, Freud presented many
illustrations from the treasury of Jewish jokes, particularly some of the comical
characters and situations that characterize these jokes.
Of the many characters in Jewish humor, Freud emphasized four that represent
the special ability of this much-persecuted people to find laughter even amid
terrible situations: the luckless, the beggar, the matchmaker, and the naïve. They
serve as inexhaustible material for jokes.
The following is an illustration of the many jokes on the matchmaker: A
matchmaker offers a bride to a young man, but he finds all kinds of
shortcomings in her and in his future mother-in-law. The young man says, “I
don’t like my mother-in-law. She is an old and stupid woman.” The match-
maker replies, “But you don’t marry her, only her daughter.” “Yes,” says the
young man, “but the bride is no longer young and is far from being beautiful.”
“So what?” says the matchmaker, “she’ll be more faithful to you.” “But she has
little money,” says the young man. “Who is talking here of money?” asks the
matchmaker. “Do you want money or a wife?” “But she is a hunchback, too, in
addition to all the rest,” says the young man. “So what do you think, young
man?” asks the matchmaker, “that she will be without blemish?” (Freud, 1982,
p. 78)
Freud investigated the unconscious elements included in the joke, the hoax,
and anecdotes in his cultural environment and found that the joke is the most
popular. Jokes provide opportunities for more meaningful enjoyment. They
enable one to express unconscious emotions, attitudes, and thoughts; only a joke
can make the point and, without the point, there is no joke. The joke tries to give
the most laughter and happiness to the second party. We cannot laugh at our own
jokes. When we tell a joke or anecdote to another person, we enjoy it ourselves,
and we laugh with that person, even if to a lesser degree.
118 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
is called gallows humor. It became an integral part of life in the camps. It protected
the courage of the prisoners and raised their morale (Cronstrom-Beskow, 1991).
Humor enabled the prisoners to break the pattern of fear and the expectation of
anxiety that enhances it and to control their own destinies to some degree, rather
than to remain victims of the instincts that push them to obsessive behaviors.
Frankl personally experienced that no amount of persuasion, force, explanation, or
guidance suffices for people who are mired in their own fear. Only turning to the
human capacity to laugh via humor gets the sought-after result.
terrible pain that nobody will be able to read what I write.” The first reaction of
this man to Frankl’s advice was to smile and nod his head in wonder. After a while
he agreed to try what Frankl has advised him to do. The result was amazing: the
pain disappeared in a few days and did not return, even after a long time during
which this man was in follow-up treatment (Bulka, 1989, p. 50).
There are several important differences in the attitude to humor, particularly
to jokes, between Freud and Frankl. Freud’s interest was motivated mainly by a
wish to understand the mechanism of the joke in terms of its physiological and
psychological characteristics. Frankl, on the other hand, wanted to understand
why the joke can serve as a roadblock to anxiety.
In Frankl’s Man’s Search for Meaning (1962), he emphasized that humor was
one of the most important means for survival. It served as a spiritual victory over
the persecutors and murderers. Humor protected the sanity of the prisoners and
turned their minds away, even if for a few minutes, from the inhuman conditions
in the camps. Derision and laughter helped, even in the hardest and cruelest
hours, to ease the suffering and torture of the prisoners.
Frankl wrote that he practically trained a friend who worked next to him on
the building site to develop a sense of humor. Frankl suggested to him that they
would promise each other to invent at least one amusing story daily, about some
incident that could happen one day after their liberation (p. 42).
Frankl realized those elements that make laughter such a valuable medicine in
the hands of a quick-witted and well-trained therapist: the surprises contained in
turning the same objects that the patient fears into tools to heal him; exaggerat-
ing the fear to the extent that it becomes laughable, while maintaining a serious
attitude; the willingness of the therapist to take an active part in the humorous
situation to bolster the patient’s self-confidence; and the enabling function, so that
the client discovers and realizes that fear can be controlled, even extinguished, by
the power of laughter.
Frankl’s discovery of the mechanism by which underlying anxiety can be
turned around and used for the treatment of neuroses is truly a testimony to his
creativity. As soon as the patient stops fighting his or her obsessions and tries
instead to ridicule them by irony and by applying paradoxical intention, the
vicious circle is cut, the symptom diminishes, and the obsession finally atrophies.
Confronting fear is the best medicine to overcome a phobia, Frankl declared.
He cited his own encounter with such a situation: On a mountain climbing
occasion that happened on a rainy day, Frankl witnessed the fall of one of the
climbers into a ravine some 200 yards below. The man miraculously survived. Two
weeks later Frankl climbed along the same steep path, and once again it happened
to be a rainy day. Yet, despite the psychological shock that he had experienced two
weeks earlier, he was able to overcome his fear and the mental trauma that he had
suffered.
Frankl (1985) stated that it is important to assess when to use logotherapy and
paradoxical intention and in which cases their use may bring about unwanted
results. For example, Peter (not his real name), a sixty-eight-year-old man, came
The Importance of Humor and Laughter in Old Age 121
to logotherapeutic treatment on the advice of his friend. The latter was a former
client and had known the therapist a long time. Peter was constantly in fear of
making mistakes in his work as an accountant in a large corporation. The sense of
fear had spread from the workplace to his home. He was particularly afraid of his
supervisor, who used to derogate, tease, and plot against him. Each time the
supervisor appeared, Peter was flooded with anxiety and dread of meeting that
man.
Peter had had an unhappy childhood. His father demanded that he excel in his
studies and in sports, and, when Peter could not deliver good results, his father
would despise him and say that he was no good and would never succeed in life.
It seems as if Peter had internalized the warnings of his father and became slow,
lacked self-assurance, and could not trust his intelligence to understand even
simple stories and facts. His mind was occupied with thoughts that tortured him,
especially with his father’s prophesies about the fate waiting for him. Even though
he had an aptitude for numbers and mathematics, Peter was not able to
concentrate on his work. The fear of making mistakes would paralyze him
sometimes for a long time, and his failure to cope with this fear only emphasized
the predictions of his father.
The treatment of his fears concentrated at first on strengthening his self-worth
and dignity as a human being and enhancing his self-image. There was a need to
change his attitude toward the prophecy of his father by concentrating on what he
had achieved so far in life despite that prophecy. This required repeated
discussions and simple exercises that helped him see that, in several important
areas of life, such as work and family life, he had not failed. Peter could find solace
by understanding that he knew how to help his children when they needed help.
Strengthening his sense of security in himself helped him relax. Now he began to
concentrate on the present and the future, rather than on reviewing the past. Also,
Peter was able to develop a change in attitude toward his supervisor by using
paradoxical intention. Learning this technique taught him to laugh at his fears
and to mock and ridicule them.
Lukas (1986a) maintains that the formulations that the patient learns to use
must be humorous enough to eliminate serious misgivings and to defuse the fear.
(The same technique is detailed on p. 108 in the Hebrew translation of this book
by Elisabeth Lukas [1988] Meaningful Living: A Logotherapy Book.) At first
patients practice these formulations with the therapist. Later, alone, they face the
feared situation. Lukas also said that what makes us smile and laugh cannot cause
horror.
At the first encounter with this technique, Lukas’s client failed to perceive the
humor behind the words of the therapist. His sense of humor was weak. Yet he
was determined to master the homework that he was given at each session until
his efforts were fruitful. As a result he gained greater faith in his ability to deal with
fearful situations at the workplace and at home.
Breaking the pattern of fear by an exaggerated wish for the very same thing that
is feared and replacing it with a healthy attitude to life may bring about a new
122 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
sense of self and well-being. The unique capacity of human beings to laugh at
themselves has been found to be of great importance for survival, in both the
clinical and the community sense. As Bulka (1989) stated: “By laughing at defeat,
we transcend it; by jesting in the midst of our predicament, we transcend it; by
smiling in the midst of depressing circumstances, we retain our individual and
group sanity” (p. 58).
13
A seventy-eight-year-old businessman, whom we shall call Mr. Smith, was sick with
an incurable illness. He lay in his bed, day after day, and waited for his death. While
he waited, he had plenty of time to review his life. He remembered those years in
which he was the manager of a large chemical plant. He remembered the effort he
invested in the development of the plant that gave him much pleasure and satis-
faction. Yet, these could not stop his heart from aching. He became aware of the
price he paid for his success: His wife had to give up a career as a gifted teacher to
share the burden of managing the business with him, and his three sons gradually
became strangers to him.
Mr. Smith was musing to himself that he had lost the opportunity to really
know his children, for he had never had time for them. The business absorbed all
his energy and interest. Sometimes he had felt pangs from his conscience and
could sense that it demanded a change in his behavior, but he didn’t listen to these
warnings. Now lying on his deathbed, so close to his end, he thought that it was
too late to change. He fell into a mood of great dissatisfaction with himself. He felt
that he had failed as a father and as a husband.
The philosopher Eva Ancsel (1995), in Life as an Unknown Story, states that
one’s motivations may remain hidden to the extent that sometimes one cannot
differentiate between what is real and what is an illusion, between the true and the
false. Human beings, and only human beings, have a tendency for self-deception.
Animals, by nature, simply cannot do it. This tendency is expressed in wishful
thinking, and in harboring the thoughts we wish to believe, regardless of what is
true. A human being can cheat, and yet believe his or her actions are right and
honest. This self-deception is usually connected to the wish to gain something
without paying its price and without carrying responsibility for it.
People are not transparent. We cannot see through them and know what they
really feel, think, and imagine. Therefore we do not know whether or not they are
123
124 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
sincere with themselves and with the social worlds that encompass them. This lack
of transparency gives an individual his or her inner freedom. Only those who are
mentally sick wish to and are able to express their inner thoughts without control
and without consideration for other people’s feelings (Ancsel, p. 39). The lack of
transparency is a privilege, says Ancsel, even if it makes cheating possible, for there
are times when the cheating and misleading of others are necessary.
In The Devil in Moscow Bulgakov (1993) describes an imaginary discussion
between Jesus and Pilatus, the Roman Governor of Judea. When he sentences
Jesus to death for lack of respect for the Emperor Tiberius and for teaching
revolutionary and dangerous ideas, Pilatus is attracted in a strange way to the
human quality of Jesus. Pilatus experiences a feeling that what he should do, what
is right to do, what is meaningful in this situation is to release this man as one who
is not at all dangerous to the people. Pilatus understands that this is the meaning
of the moment, yet he listens to the high priest and sentences Jesus to death.
Immediately after the sentencing Pilatus’s conscience begins to nag him, yet he
disregards his inner feeling; he disregards what is just and true. Pilatus knows that
the accused is innocent, yet he acts contrary to his conscience. When Jesus is taken
to the place of execution and the sentence is carried out, Pilatus understands that
only death will end his pain and suffering. A heavy sadness falls on his soul and
pierces his heart. Pilatus has a vague feeling that he missed the opportunity to ask
Jesus an important question, and this feeling accompanies him for the rest of his
life. In his musings he knows that he has forfeited his responsibility to maintain
just relationships with all the citizens in his care, and therefore he will continue to
suffer throughout his life because of this failure.
This work is valuable to all therapists due to the insight it provides into the
heart and soul of a person. Many older people today can attest to the truth
contained in this literary work. The suffering caused by guilt can embitter the lives
of those who bear it, and extinguish the joy of life for them.
In the therapeutic work I did with many people who were in the latter half of
life, with elderly widows and widowers in particular, I found a phenomenon that
was present in almost every case. Each individual tried to explain his or her mental
distress by stating that he or she did not listen to the voice of his or her conscience,
and did not heed the meaning of the moment when it came. These individuals
were afraid to leave the path of social conformity. They did not allow themselves
to live their lives as they really wished. They renounced their own wishes in order
to please their families, relatives, and friends. Their social standing was more
important for them than their own peace of mind.
Giving permission to one’s self to behave in accordance with one’s unique way
of being authentic, to express one’s unique personality—without deviating from
the right path—is essential for mental and spiritual health for everybody, includ-
ing old people. It is imperative for therapists. This permission is the basis for good
therapy, while for the client it is an achievement. Giving permission to the client
to be unique and authentic is the first step in the client’s long journey to become
a really authentic individual. The following case is presented for illustration:
Dealing with Guilt and Remorse 125
A woman we will call Mrs. Cahn, aged sixty-nine, recently became a widow and
complained of headaches, dizziness, and a dull feeling of anxiety and depression.
These symptoms were familiar to her. During the forty-two years of her marriage
she had experienced similar feelings rather frequently, but she used to ignore them
as by-products of the tensions of modern living. When her husband died, she lost
interest in her grandchildren, and didn’t want to participate in social gatherings.
When her children insisted she be present, she would sit in a corner in complete
passivity, withdrawn, and told her family that life had lost interest for her.
At the repeated requests of her children, she agreed to see a therapist. In the
first session she said that she had been angry at herself for many years. “You see”,
she said to the therapist, “I know exactly when I started to have my headaches.
The first time it happened was two years after my marriage. At that time we lived
in a large city in which I had a good job and many friends, and I was liked by all.
I had a dream of being an actress at the local theater. But my husband urged me
to move to a smaller place where he could be near his friends. He also had
ambitions for a career in politics, and he thought that in that smaller city he
could succeed better and more easily than in a bigger one. I had my chances to
object to these ideas, but I didn’t use them. My heart told me to stay where I felt
good, but I gave in and agreed to move. Since then my life has lost its meaning:
Outwardly I remained the same and did what was expected of me, but inside I
felt frozen. Many times I have felt that I am doing things against my real wishes;
that I am sacrificing myself and my dream. I heard my heart telling me to
demand that my husband change this situation, but, instead, I escaped to these
headaches and depressions. I continued to ignore my real self, my inner self, and
see what has become of me.”
A human being always has a choice to act in the right way. Departure from that
way and doing a bad deed, whether by intention or by mistake, brings in its wake
a feeling of guilt. Yet whether we choose the right way, or ignore it and engage in
bad deeds, there is no way to escape the responsibility that accompanies the
choice. The one who chooses the wrong way is punished by a feeling of guilt
which is hard to bear. This feeling can be so intense that it can drive the sinner to
suicide, as in Tolstoy’s novel Anna Karenina.
John Lukacs (2001), the well-known historian and philosopher, differentiates
between sin and taboo. Sin as a phenomenon is dependent on social relationships.
It cannot be erased from one’s consciousness. When we sin, we know that we have
sinned, but do not necessarily feel guilty. Yet sooner or later the sin causes us to
feel sad and to regret what we did, and even feel responsible for our deeds. These
feelings are what we call guilt feelings. Taboo, on the other hand, is a strong social
prohibition against words, objects, actions, discussion, or people that are
considered undesirable or offensive by a group, culture, or society.
Sigmund Freud (1950), in his classic book on Totem and Taboo, traced the
origin of the taboo to the fear of the presence or return of the dead person’s ghost
among the savages. This fear leads them to various ceremonies aimed at keeping
the ghost at a distance. Freud also has shown that there are many similarities
between taboo-holders and obsessive neurotics that point to a psychological
condition that prevails in the unconscious. According to Freud, there are two
universal taboos, incest and patricide (Freud, pp. 26–30).
As in many other areas of human behavior, the subject of guilt and guilt feeling
must begin with the attitude of Freud toward these concepts, for he paved the way
to modern psychology and psychotherapy. Freud coined the term super-ego to
explain the concept of conscience. This psychological mechanism represented for
him the moral demands society makes of its members. It was perceived as a father
figure that commands individual behavior in accordance with the demands of
religion and society. According to Freud’s theory, disregard for the rules and
demands of society causes guilt feelings. His concept of the super-ego was based
on the mythological figure of Oedipus; guilt and guilt feelings derive from the
psychological complex associated with this figure in the well-known myth. The
Oedipus complex derives from an old story in ancient Greece about a king whose
fate was to kill his father and marry his mother. Oedipus tried to escape this cruel
fate, but could not. After he unwittingly committed these terrible crimes, he
punished himself with blindness. His mother objected to the investigation of her
son-husband and insisted that many men dream of sexual relations with their
mothers, yet there is no need to attach much importance to dreams. Freud (1994),
in Introduction to Psychoanalysis, said, “But we do not disdain the dreams, and
especially not typical dreams, those that happen to many people, and we do not
doubt that the dream Iokasta [Oedipus’s mother] mentions is connected in a
strong connection to the horrible content of this myth” (p. 270).
This severe super-ego dictates to the ego its standards of behavior, disregarding
the pressures that come from the id—the drives and instincts—and from the
Dealing with Guilt and Remorse 127
outside world, meaning society. If these standards are not heeded, then the super-
ego punishes the individual with a strong feeling of inferiority and guilt.
Not every leading psychologist in the Viennese schools of psychology agreed
with Freud’s attitude toward the task of the super-ego, nor with Freud’s division
of the human soul into three parts, in which only one part controls morality and
the deeds considered bad by society. Alfred Adler (1994) thought that man’s style
of living can be good or bad, but there is no need to connect it to guilt feeling. We
are born with an inability to solve all the problems life brings to us, Adler said, and
our task is to develop a socially responsible lifestyle, and to accept responsibility
for our failures.
Carl Gustav Jung refrained from speaking about guilt and guilt feeling. Jung
based his approach to the concept of guilt largely on the concept of the collective
subconscious that exists in the human soul—in which guilt is always connected
to the first sin of man and woman as described in the Bible. This sin is connected
to the oppression of the sexual drives of the id by the super-ego.
Today we have a different social attitude toward sexual urges and their
satisfaction, and toward guilt feelings. Yet the concept of guilt continues to serve
as a subject for much discussion and debate (Kalmar, 1997). Whereas in Freud’s
time, in the Victorian era, many people experienced guilt feelings due to giving
freedom and expression to their sexual urges that in those days were prohibited,
today the opposite is true; today the repression of those urges and drives are the
sources of the guilt feelings.
look forward to the joys of the empty nest, meaning the freedom from the
parenting functions and pursuit of individual goals and dreams—only to find
themselves burdened with new responsibilities in caring for their own parents.
Many such caretakers resent the fate that forces them to postpone, or to give up
completely, their dreams.
Professional literature in gerontology contains many studies that deal with the
relationships between elderly parents and their adult children in the industrialized
world (Olson, 1994). For example, Volkov (1992), in To Be Son to an Elderly
Parent: A Phase in the Family’s Life Cycle Crisis, presents many cases that illustrate
the crisis in the relationships between elderly parents and their adult children
within Israeli families. Her book describes situations in which there is no escape
from placing an elderly parent in a nursing home.
According to professional literature in gerontology, family members are not the
only ones who take care of old, frail, sick, and mentally deficient people. A system
of community services and institutions of all kinds provide service at various
levels of quality and quantity in accordance with the economic situation of the
elderly people and their families, both in private and in public and/or government
sectors.
It is a well known maxim that elderly people as a whole prefer to live in their
own homes, apartments, and neighborhoods as long as possible. The same applies
to their adult children who provide the bulk of services for their parents in the
parents’ home. They resist the temptation to transfer the old parent to a nursing
or an old age home as long as possible. They see in these institutions the last
resort, a most unwanted solution.
Many researchers in gerontology have found that the majority of elderly
parents are transferred to an institution only when the main caretaker becomes ill,
or has exhausted him- or herself. Even then, they see in this transfer one of the
saddest events they have experienced in their lives (Olson, 1994). For example:
A woman we shall call Mrs. Brown, aged eighty, suffered a sudden
deterioration in her health and could not remember when she had last taken her
medications against high blood pressure. Mrs. Brown was caught time and time
again leaving the gas open after she cooked something for herself. Sometimes
she was also found in a ditch near her home after she lost her balance and fell.
There were black and blue bruises on her body from bumping into the furniture
in her apartment. In addition, several times Mrs. Brown forgot the address of
her home and was seen searching helplessly for someone to tell her.
Mrs. Brown’s family did what they could to lengthen her stay at her apartment,
but they were not able to cope with her need for twenty-four-hour care and
supervision. This situation caused many ambivalent feelings for her children. On
the one hand, they saw the need to place Mrs. Brown in a nursing home where she
would get proper care; on the other hand, they were suffering from the emotional
conflict of choosing one of the two alternatives when both were seen as bad.
Volkov (1992) wrote that the daughter, usually the main caretaker, suffers more
than the other siblings, for she is torn between her personal and family’s needs
Dealing with Guilt and Remorse 129
and the needs of the parent. Volkov emphasized that the emotional support the
main caretaker needs is no less important than the concrete help the family
should get from a professional worker (p. 74).
In this catch-22 situation, it is impossible to escape feelings of guilt that
emanate from caring for an aged parent in need of institutional placement.
Parents may also have guilt feelings. These are expressed in declarations such as,
“I don’t want to be a burden for my children.” Many suffering and frustrated
parents cite the well-known proverb: “One parent can care for ten children—and
ten children can’t care for one parent.”
The professional literature in gerontology has passed over the guilt feelings of
the elderly parents toward their offspring and deals mainly with the opposite
situation described above. The non-professional literature, on the other hand,
describes many cases in which guilt feelings of old parents serve as motivation for
regret. An illustration of such a case is found in Tamaro’s (1997) book To Follow
Your Heart, in which the heroine, an elderly Italian woman who feels that her days
are coming to an end, writes a long letter to her granddaughter. This letter is a
confession and life review. When the woman confessed to her daughter that the
man whom the daughter thought of as her father was not her real father, the
daughter ran away in a car and was killed in an accident (p. 68). The woman raised
her granddaughter after her daughter died in this accident.
The old woman feels guilty for never telling her granddaughter how the
accident really happened. In the letter, she speaks about the hard life and suffering
she has experienced because she was a smart and curious child. In her youth, those
traits were not welcomed by society. The grandmother hopes that the losses she
has experienced in her long life will help the granddaughter to develop a healthy
approach to life. She gives her granddaughter the following advice: “When there
will be many paths before you and you will not know which to take, then don’t
choose one at random, or by chance, but sit down and wait . . . Sit in your place,
quietly, and listen to the voice of your heart. And when it will speak to you, get up
and go where it will lead you” (Tamaro, p. 65).
This old and intelligent woman is able to understand that it is impossible to run
away from guilt feeling, and it is impossible to accuse others. The grandmother
knows that one has to be brave to carry guilt and to accept responsibility for one’s
failings. She understands that the only way to cope with guilt is by continuing to
live, by moving forward, and by trying to prevent its recurrence. The old woman
wants to help her granddaughter not to repeat the mistakes she made in her youth.
Guilt occupies a central role in logotherapy. Frankl used to tell his own story,
detailed in this book in principle number eleven, to illustrate this concept. The
lesson learned from this dramatic and true story is this: If Frankl had chosen to
go to America, rather than staying with his elderly parents, he would most likely
have been punished by his conscience with guilt feelings for abandoning them to
their fates. In the long run, escaping one’s responsibility always leads to neurosis,
or to a life without meaning. Logotherapy characterizes such life as living in an
existential vacuum.
Frankl viewed guilt connected with suffering and death as a phenomenon that
everybody will encounter in his or her life. Yet, he did not attach the same value
to guilt as to the other two sides of the tragic triangle. He wished to emphasize
that meaning can be squeezed even from guilt, by turning it into an opportunity
to change and to make one into a better person. Existential guilt is embedded in
one’s soul, said Frankl (1982), and he cited the words of the philosopher Scheler,
who said that man has a right to be guilty and to be punished. “When we try to
nullify his guilt by seeing him as a victim of circumstances, we take away his
dignity as a human being. I tend to say, one of the privileges of man is to feel
guilty. But it is also true that his responsibility demands of him to overcome his
guilt” (Frankl, 1982, p. 58).
Logotherapy differentiates between real, neurotic, and noetic guilt. Real guilt
emanates from a real event, due to some act that was basically wrong. This is guilt
by commission. There is also a guilt which is felt for something that was supposed
to be done and was not. This is guilt by omission. For example, lack of attention to
the needs of an old and frail parent for security is guilt by omission. When the
parent falls and gets hurt, then the party who failed to act feels remorse and guilt.
Neurotic guilt is felt by someone who did not actually perform a wrong
deed—only wished for it to happen. The most dramatic illustration of neurotic
guilt was given by Shakespeare in his play Macbeth. The intention or wish to do
something bad has deep roots in the human soul. Lady Macbeth is very ambi-
tious to become Queen of Scotland. This ambition leads her to wish for the death
of Duncan, the king. Lady Macbeth manages to persuade her husband to commit
a horrible crime, killing King Duncan and blaming the servants for his death.
When the plot succeeds and Lady Macbeth becomes queen, she is assaulted by
strong pangs of her conscience. She develops insomnia, and obsessively washes
her hands to get rid of the blood she imagines to be on them—to no avail.
In a similar vein, when someone wishes in secret for the death of his or her
aged and sick parent, and when the parent suddenly dies from natural causes, then
the person who wished for the death begins to feel guilty for having killed the
parent. This feeling of guilt has no real basis, yet the person cannot get rid of it.
Often this person spends the rest of his or her life tormented by thoughts that he
or she caused the tragedy.
Noetic, or existential and spiritual guilt, is different from the other two. We feel
its influence in behavioral disturbances expressed in confusion, discomfort, and
dissatisfaction with self, as if something is not in order and needs to be corrected.
Dealing with Guilt and Remorse 131
considered beneath the family’s dignity. This choice angered and saddened Jacob.
There were many loud debates and quarrels between them every time the son
visited his parents’ home, until one day Jacob, who in the meantime had become
ill, told his son that he would disinherit him. From that day on the son would not
come to see his father.
When Jacob was nearing his death, he was tormented by his rashness and by
the manner in which he told his son about the decision to disinherit him. Jacob
consulted with the therapist how to restore the relationship with his son. The
therapist suggested that Jacob express true and full regret and correct his will.
Jacob, however, did not have the courage to do as advised. Nor did he do what
could have eased his torment and give justice to his son. Jacob died shortly
afterward with a heavy feeling of guilt.
14
A great spirit has an opportunity for development even in a lonely life. (Seneca,
1997, On Mental Calmness, p. 20)
Although the Bible says “It is not good for man to be alone” (Genesis 2:18), more
and more elderly people live alone and suffer from loneliness. Community
leaders, policy makers, gerontologists, and demographers consider loneliness—
which will grow as technology advances—a major problem in aging. Surprisingly,
however, this subject is among the least discussed in professional literature.
At first I was completely stunned and didn’t know what to do. Until this happened
to me I thought that our lives were in order. I simply could not imagine that my
husband would be unhappy with me. He didn’t give any sign about his dissatisfac-
tion. I’ve learned about it later, after he left home. My husband was a psychiatrist in
a private office. There was a young secretary, and he fell in love with her. When he
disappeared I finally understood what had happened, a rather banal case. I didn’t
expect such a thing from a professional supposed to control his feelings. Later we
quarreled about our joint resources and the divorce, and these left me exhausted and
hurt. At the end of all this I was left alone. I was fortunate to have sufficient resources
for a decent living in economical terms, so that I could devote time for studies. I
133
134 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
became a social worker to help other women in similar situations. This gives me
strength to live as a divorcée. But I feel that I have no chance for a new beginning.
There are no eligible men around me, and those who could qualify are “taken”
already. I will have to succumb to a life of loneliness.
moment on he must wear women’s clothes, sit among the children and the women
in the tent, and eat with them. The chief fulfilled the command of the great spirit
without losing his honor and social standing. This story is intended to teach us
about the changes in us that may happen in the second half of our lives—if we are
open to face them. Sometimes these changes include preparation and readiness
for a life of solitude (Jung, 1998, pp. 452–455).
There are many elderly and young people who did not learn to deal with
loneliness because they always ran away from it. They forget that it is impossible
to learn something when one runs away. Loneliness may be seen by many people
in the second half of life as emptiness. This is why parents call their homes empty
nests after their grown-up children leave.
Many people are afraid of looking at themselves, concentrating on and
listening to their hearts’ desires, and hearing the voice of their conscience. They
refuse to get over the barrier of fear that prevents them from accepting loneliness
in a positive way. They imagine that loneliness means not only emptiness, but also
lack of experiences. They need to learn not to be afraid of loss—even if it is
sudden, hard, and unexpected—and not to sink into self-pity. Children leaving
home or the dissolution of a marriage may contain new opportunities for self-
fulfillment—even when such opportunities involve a lot of effort.
to her husband was more important than anything in life, and she preferred to
remain a widow, waiting and hoping for a miracle.
This is a case of voluntary loneliness based on cultural, religious, and
traditional values, the result of a conservative education handed down from one
generation to the next, mainly within Eastern European Jewish religious circles.
Loneliness may be felt more or less intensely. It may lurk as a nagging reminder
of the state a person wishes to forget or deny. The elderly have a rather stereotyped
image of being lonely. This image was highlighted by the findings of the Harris
Poll in a national survey completed in 1975: Although only twelve percent of the
aged in this study thought loneliness was a very serious problem for them
personally, sixty percent considered the phenomenon to be very serious for most
elderly people.
In the most recent study conducted by the National Council on Aging, called
“The Myth and Reality of Aging in America” (March 2000), the percentages were
similar to those in 1975. Furthermore, loneliness among the young aged eighteen
to twenty-four was found to be more pronounced than among the elderly. Never-
theless, loneliness is a serious problem in old age among the noninstitutionalized
elderly living in the community.
and the whole gamut of feelings connected to it, as well as the many coping
mechanisms that people use.
Cohen thinks that the best and most meaningful attitude to loneliness is found
in literary creations, poetry, and short stories. These are relevant for therapeutic
work with the elderly who suffer from loneliness. In his books on this subject,
Cohen brings many personal stories that enliven and illustrate not only subjective
feelings about loneliness, but also its existential manifestation and its influence on
the mental health of the individual experiencing it.
As mentioned before, results of the survey conducted by the National Council
On Aging indicate that the old are by and large less lonely than the young. One
can live alone without being lonely. Most elderly people live their lives along with
others, both old and young, and continue to be involved in social affairs. However,
this finding cannot repeal the persistent myth about the loneliness of most old
people. Another myth equally popular among many older people suggests that in
former times the aged lived in harmony with their families and kin, enjoying
much honor, dignity, and reverence, and not suffering from loneliness. Alas,
reality is quite different. In all historical times the aged experienced abandonment
and, consequently, loneliness to greater or lesser degrees.
The literature on loneliness is enormous. Some of the best-known literary and
philosophical works focus on loneliness. Among these are Defoe’s Robinson
Crusoe, Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels, and Shakespeare’s As You Like It. Many great writ-
ers have written about their own solitude. Søren Kierkegaard’s The Mortal Illness
(1993) and Arthur Schopenhauer’s Life Wisdom (2001) discuss loneliness from a
philosophical perspective.
Loneliness in later life was described by Dickens (1974) as being connected to
some moral fault. One of the famous characters in Dickens’s Oliver Twist is Fagin,
an avaricious man who recruits street boys and teaches them how to steal. Dickens’s
contempt toward Fagin is revealed in his description of that character: “[Fagin] was
a very old shriveled Jew, whose villainous-looking and repulsive face was obscured
by a quantity of matted red hair” (p. 50).
Fagin is not the only Dickensian character depicted as a horrible old person.
Lonely old people in Dickens’s books are often ugly, vicious, repulsive, deformed
in body and spirit, and evil. The few exceptions to this rule are old people whose
ages aren’t noticeable through their physical appearance and who consequently
are free of the faults of old age.
It seems that Dickens was not only an ageist but an anti-Semite as well. Gibson
(2000) writes, “The writings of Dickens with their popularity and unforgettable
characterization have undoubtedly been one of the factors that have helped to
maintain this negative stereotype” (p. 78).
Another great novelist who made a remarkable contribution to the literature
on loneliness is Joseph Conrad (1857–1924). In his novels and short stories this
famous writer concentrated on loneliness as a grim phenomenon in an
individual’s life. Conrad did not find any dignity in solitude, which he viewed as
unpleasant loneliness and a product of some moral weakness and guilt. In
Coping with Loneliness 139
Conrad’s novels each man is alone, a stranger to himself, and fully aware of his
isolation from his fellow human beings.
A moving literary description of loneliness was presented by the great
twentieth-century philosopher Bertrand Russell in his Autobiography (1967).
Russell (1872–1970), recipient of the 1950 Nobel Prize in Literature, spent
eighty years in loneliness and unhappiness, longing for love and knowledge, and
struggling with his “unbearable pity for the suffering of mankind”—until he
married once again and lived happily another eighteen years (p. 13).
The lesson learned from all these literary works is rather simple: successful aging
requires courage and stoic acceptance of the vicissitudes of life, including loneliness.
Israeli population live. Since its beginnings in 1910, the kibbutz movement has
romanticized community living as well as the idea of sharing resources and work.
And one of its goals was the creation of opportunities to attain a meaningful
existence in a society in which they are masters of their own fates and destinies.
Those living in kibbutzim have higher longevity than the other Israelis.
According to various researchers who specialize in studies about living in
kibbutzim, higher longevity is associated with life in the kibbutz. Opportunities
for lifelong employment, rotation in jobs, higher levels of education, intensive
cultural life, and comfortable living conditions all increase one’s life span.
Today the problem of loneliness among the elderly has taken on frightening
proportions. It is no secret that the kibbutz movement is in serious trouble. It has
become an aging society undergoing rapid changes in its composition, purpose,
economic activities, and attitudes to the aged. Privatization is now widespread in
all Israeli kibbutzim, and in many of them such privatization has resulted in the
break-up of families, loss of values, and a different outlook on life.
Aged members who are seventy-five years old or older constitute almost three-
fifths of the population in the more established kibbutzim, whereas the average
proportion of those who are sixty-five years or older is fifteen percent. A heavy
sense of loneliness is felt particularly among the old widows and widowers who
find themselves alone after tens of years of married life in the kibbutz. This feel-
ing is intensified especially in the evening, when the elderly are usually alone in
their rooms, and during holidays such as Passover and New Year’s.
Many elderly widows say that they feel lost and unhappy. One of them said, “It
is true that we have a social club for the members where we can listen to lectures.
We can join therapy groups in the nearby city, go on sightseeing tours, and engage
in many other activities; but when darkness falls, everybody is closeted in his or
her room, and then we feel the full burden of loneliness. Sometimes I want to cry
out aloud my sadness and unhappiness.” The following case illustrates this
situation.
Sarah (fictitious name), age seventy-two, has recently become a widow. She has
lived in an older kibbutz for over fifty years. Sarah has a relatively large family in
the kibbutz, and she is regarded as one of the more fortunate members because
she has children and grandchildren living in the same place as she does. In the kib-
butz, many of the widows without a family are envious of her.
Sarah is aware of her fortune. “You see,” she told her group worker, “it is true
that objectively speaking I am in a better situation compared to many other
widows in the kibbutz, but they don’t know how much I suffer from loneliness.
When I come home after a visit with my children and grandchildren the walls close
and suffocate me, and I want to scream! And when I sit to eat my meals alone,
without having a soul with whom to share, I feel so sad. It is hard to describe. The
monotony of each day resembles another, like two drops of water. This simply
makes me mad. Sometimes I invite a stranger, one with whom I never had any
social relationships in the kibbutz, to share a meal with me just to escape being
alone.”
Coping with Loneliness 141
from the very way our heart is built, from our structure as human beings” (p. 18).
When such feeling of loss pervades the human soul, it can result in the feeling that
one’s life was wasted, and this may contribute to a strong feeling of loneliness.
Loneliness does not need to be like this. An older person does not need to see
his or her loneliness as immutable fate. On the contrary, one must remind him-
or herself of the original words Frankl used in his famous book Man’s Search for
Meaning (1962): “Despite everything else say yes to life!” The word “despite” is the
key to changing the situation.
Logotherapy maintains that a human being is a choosing creature, that is, a
creature that chooses the attitude toward what happens to him or to her. And
there is no situation, however difficult, that doesn’t offer more than one choice.
One does not need to accept without revolt or protest what life and fate throw in
one’s path, but one can always take a stand.
Research in gerontology has shown that aged people close to death, who made
special efforts to “survive until Christmas,” or “until the wedding of my
granddaughter” did in fact survive (Olson, 1994).
Coping with loneliness, as with any other situation in life, is dependent on
one’s resources. Coping with loneliness is not different from coping with other
emotions in life. The greater the resources available to human beings, both
internal and external, the more human beings are able to diminish the effects of
the harms and losses that befall them, for the resources act as a shield against the
tension and stress that accompany the losses.
Coping requires a change in attitude to what happens to the person. Changing
a person’s attitude from preoccupation with his or her misery and loneliness to
one of service to the less fortunate as well as redirecting the mental energy to dis-
cover new meaning in life are imperatives in logotherapy’s attitude to loneliness.
Life is full of wonders, miracles, and surprises. We only need to open our eyes
to discover all that it entails. Each human being is given opportunities to find
something meaningful during the second half of life. Each human being is
blessed with the ability to love ideas, nature, as well as other human beings. Such
love may become a source of satisfaction even in loneliness. For example, in an
Israeli kibbutz there was once an old man who lived a life of solitude. His behav-
ior was eccentric too. He used to get up early in the morning to walk in the fields,
listen to the singing of the birds, and enjoy the fresh air and the beauty around
him. At the end of his walk, he would return to the settlement, and with his eyes
glued to the ground he would look for old and rusty nails around the various
workshops, garages, and factories. The ones he found he would take to his little
workshop. There he would straighten and hammer and keep them in boxes
marked according to their sizes. This habit was a never-ending source of jokes
and laughing matter for the young members of the kibbutz. They saw in him the
epitome of stinginess and strangeness characteristic of old people. Yet, these nails
helped a lot in the war of liberation, when the kibbutz came under siege and
there was a need to erect barricades. They literally saved the kibbutz from being
overrun. Then all the people in the kibbutz became aware of the contribution
144 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
this old man had made to the defense of the settlement with his nails. Those nails
in fact expressed his love for life in the kibbutz.
Many great philosophers found power and strength in loneliness, something
good and advisable for aging people. They chose loneliness not to escape reality
or to avoid the hatred of others. They were not secluded as monks in a monastery
and did not preach refraining from the pleasures of life. They saw in loneliness an
opportunity for spiritual enrichment, an opportunity for creating something that
can be created only in solitude.
Even an ordinary person—someone who is not a philosopher or a great scientist
such as Einstein—may aim at learning and creating something. One cannot expect
someone else—other than oneself—to free him or her from the oppressive feeling
of loneliness, if such a feeling persists. Our children can’t do such a miracle—even
if they would devote all their time and energy to that purpose. When we learn how
to deal honestly and earnestly with this feeling, we will be able to attain mental
tranquility.
The psychoanalyst Carl Gustav Jung (1993) wrote that if we shall walk in the
paths of the depth of our souls; if we shall discover what is hidden inside our
psyche and free it from all the hard layers that were erected on top of it during
many years of existence, we shall free the divine spark enclosed. That spark, when
freed, will ignite a flame that will illuminate the darkness. This way we will be able
to look at the face of loneliness bravely, without fear, as an integral part of life.
15
A Logotherapeutic Perspective
on Death
145
146 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
The death of the ancient Roman philosopher Seneca could serve as a model for
all of us. When he was commanded by the Emperor Nero to put an end to his life,
Seneca sat calmly and stoically in his bathroom, took a knife, and cut the arteries
in his ankles. Then he waited patiently until life slowly left him and he died.
A healthy individual accepts death as something healthy, as part of nature and
life. Therefore, an old man who doesn’t learn, in the course of his life, to accept
death calmly, without complaint or fear, is indeed foolish. Cicero said that old
men and women must accept the fact that nature has its own way. All things in
accordance with nature are good, including death. The little time left to old people
should not be spent with greedy eagerness or abandoned without cause. “To dis-
regard death is a lesson which must be studied from our youth and up; for unless
that is learnt, no one can have a quiet mind” (Cicero, p. 73).
as smoking and drinking; one’s genetic inclinations and heredity, marital status
(better married than single), and lifestyle in terms of nutrition, engagement in
physical exercise and sport, and investment in spiritual matters.
There are three main causes of death for people in their sixties and up: illnesses
related to blood circulation; illnesses affecting breathing, and cancer. If it were
possible, all of us would like to die as Moses in the Old Testament. It is written
there that he was 120 years old when he died; his eyes were not dim, his strength
was not abated, and the “kiss of death” took him.
Even illnesses that quickly bring about death can be desired as a means for dying.
Everybody would like to die in such a way that all others left living would say that
he or she died in an instant. And even if pain is not the factor that makes death
fearful, most people see pain as something undesirable, and they are afraid of it.
There are other experiences connected to death—such as depression, depend-
ence on others, confusion, loss of dignity and mobility, difficulty in breathing,
constipation, and apathy—that make it so hard to bear even in thought.
Aged people everywhere would like to extend life as long as possible without
losses in physical and mental health, and to die without too much suffering or
pain. Older people prefer to die in their own homes and own beds, surrounded by
a loving and supportive family. But the chances for attaining this are not very
good. Only one-third of all elderly people have this wish fulfilled; the others die
in nursing homes and in hospitals. All human beings would like to die in
accordance with the etymological sense of the word euthanasia, which means good
death, that is, death with dignity and without suffering.
If aging were perceived by older people as a happy period in their lives, and if
there were satisfying living conditions for old people in general, then it would be
possible to approach death without fear and to perceive it as an opportunity to greet
the dead as we do when someone goes on a holiday, as if he left for a life of eternity
and thus there is no need to cry for him. Then there would be no need to think of
the dead as a loser in the game of life.
In an idealistic and utopian attitude toward life older people should have
waited for a time when death would be perceived as something positive, when
people could be happy for the departed as one who has fulfilled his mission in life
and who can now expect new adventures that we cannot even imagine. Such an
attitude to death was exhibited by the famous Hasidic Rabbi Simcha Bunam.
When he was lying on his deathbed and his wife was crying bitter tears, he said,
“Why are you crying? Don’t you know that my whole life was in order to learn
how to die?” (Buber, 1976, p. 31).
sink slowly until the end of the circle. The same thing happens with people. As
children and teenagers, their parents and teachers help them develop and
advance in life, until they reach the zenith of their careers in accordance with
their talents, perseverance, and a bit of luck. And in the second half of their
lives the task is to concentrate on easing the descent. Many young adults mis-
takenly think that life has value only during the ascent, when one is on the
move toward greater achievements.
The psychologist Carl Gustav Jung perceived the second half of life as no less
rich in terms of development than the first one. Human beings have natural and
cultural goals. A young man is busy with creating a family, looking for a job, and
securing his social standing. When this phase is over, then he begins to pursue
his cultural goal, which is to enrich the overall culture of human beings.
Unfortunately, he has no help from his parents or from others for achieving this
second goal.
One must engage in this process by his own effort. If in one’s childhood and
youth the fear of life was an obstacle for fulfilling the natural goal, in the second
half of life the obstacle is the fear of death. Yet, despite what has been said above,
there is help for the interested. This help is religion, but this is relevant to only
a small part of mankind, those we call believers. For these people the belief in
their religious values serves as preparation for old age, death, and life in the
world to come.
Many people live with a feeling that they have missed the boat, that they
have missed many opportunities; they thus start the second half of their lives
looking back, or even worse, standing paralyzed in one place, rather than
advancing with time.
The Hungarian poet George Faludy wrote a ballad about such a person.
Charley Null, Faludy’s protagonist, looks back at his life at the age of sixty and
decides that he must write down what he has done in those sixty years. But he
doesn’t know if he should begin with his youth, which now seems to him empty
of content, or with his adulthood, which went by without great experiences.
Charley remembers those years that were full of boring work and insignificant
events. Now he feels he’s aging, and he becomes angry at himself for having
missed all the opportunities to make his life meaningful. He wants to get back all
the dreams he had, all the passions he never fulfilled; he wants to know his real
self. He thus decides to put his reflections and thoughts on paper. He goes to a
store, buys 100 sheets of paper, and sits at his desk to write. The next day at noon,
when his daughter comes to visit him, she finds him dead, bent over his desk. A
hundred sheets of paper were neatly arranged, and at the top of the first one was
written My Life, and nothing else. No lines, no words; only the empty pages: these
were his life.
In the second half of life the goal should be to make the descent meaningful.
Death should be meaningful to man in the same way as birth is. And whoever is
not making the necessary preparations resembles a young man running away
from life as an adult.
A Logotherapeutic Perspective on Death 149
In On the Paths of Our Depths (1993), Jung emphasizes that an aging person
must remember that his life will not reach new heights, for an irreversible inner
process narrows it (p. 17). Death indeed can be horrible; yet, it can also bring ease
and the means to another existence that we cannot fathom at this time.
DEATH AS A CONCEPT
In the second half of our lives, we become more and more aware of the finality
of life and of death, which is waiting for us all. We feel that the time left is decreas-
ing. This feeling varies from one individual to another, for each human being lives
and dies in his or her unique way. The literature dealing with the subject of death
shows that, in general, we can approach death from four perspectives: (1) as an
entrance into eternity; (2) as a phenomenon in accordance with the rules of
nature; (3) as an event to be accepted quietly; or (4) as a friend one greets happily,
for it comes when one is ready, and it helps one depart with a feeling that one has
done his or her share and lived a meaningful life. Therefore, one is not afraid of
death. One perceives dying as a task to be fulfilled decently.
the promise of an afterlife enables one to work hard in this world, so that he or
she could gain entrance to the heavenly world. Yet, if God doesn’t exist, as so many
scientists and atheists claim, then our whole world is absurd and life too is absurd.
A most moving and poetic description of death is found in Hrabal’s (1994)
previously mentioned book Too Noisy Silence. The hero in this book loses his job at
the mill after thirty-five years. His machine is replaced by a modern compressor that
can produce ten times as many packages as the old one. Lonely and forlorn by his
friends and acquaintances, he sits down on a bench in the park and imagines how his
old machine will make a nice package for his body. The hero imagines meeting the
little gipsy girl who used to sneak into his small room and share her life with him—
until she was taken by the Germans to a concentration camp and never returned.
Hrabal wrote, “I was sitting on the bench, smiling an innocent smile; I didn’t
remember anything, didn’t hear anything, for I was already in the midst of the
‘Garden of Eden’ and thus I couldn’t see or hear my two gipsy women [being]
hugged by two gipsy men passing me in a hurry like in a dance and disappear
beyond the bushes” (p. 77).
happy with the knowledge of having already lived a long life. And now he or she
can look back on it and see all achievements, love, and suffering experienced in a
long life. These fill his or her heart with pride.
Frankl compared human life to a work of art. Similar to the sculptor who
takes a block of stone and works it with a hammer and chisel to give it form and
create a statute, without knowing when he or she will complete it, so is a person’s
life, for one never knows when one will be called. Thus he or she must use the
time available to move forward with his work—even if his creation will not be
finished.
Sometimes an unfinished work is the most beautiful, as are the symphonies of
Schubert and Mozart. The fact that a work is not finished does not necessarily
mean that it has no meaning and value. The richness of one’s life, not its length,
is what enhances life’s worth.
The finiteness of life can be a reminder that we should use the available time
and opportunities in the best possible way. Therefore, we must be aware of and
responsible for our own lives. This attitude to life and death is available to
everybody, irrespective of one’s level of education and social standing.
The therapist may ask a client to imagine that he or she is old and pondering
over the pages of his or her life. Then a miracle happens and the client can choose
what to change in the last chapter of his or her life. If the client is able to imagine
such a situation, then he or she could grasp the weight of the responsibility for his
or her life in a given moment and understand what this responsibility demands of
him or her each and every day.
Frankl used to emphasize a maxim of logotherapy: live as if you were living your
life a second time and avoid the mistakes you did the first time. He used to ask his
clients to imagine their lives as a movie, but without being able to reverse what has
been recorded. Thus they could see their own responsibility for what had happened
and was happening, and correct what may still be possible to correct in the future.
Frankl was asked whether life should be preserved at all costs. He replied that
when life is no longer fit for human beings—that is, when the lives of human
beings become similar to those of lower animals or vegetables—they live such
horrible lives that it would be better to die, for any human being would refuse
such a life. Each individual would like to live a meaningful life irrespective of its
length. A short life can be full of accomplishments, such as the lives of many great
composers, and a long life can be without value.
Death gives value to life. Without death people would postpone doing
everything and disregard all commitment and responsibility toward their time.
Life itself would thus be without value and meaning.
Klingberg (2001) wrote a biography of Viktor Frankl and his wife, Eleanor.
Viktor used to say that the greatest value and honor that had been bestowed on him
was a certificate attesting that on his ninetieth birthday ninety trees were planted
by students of a high school in Canada, one tree for each year of his life. And every
time Viktor passed by this certificate he used to say, “Whenever I see this certificate,
I am ready to die” (p. 319).
A Logotherapeutic Perspective on Death 153
solve real problems in life by throwing away life itself. And in the same way that
the chess player is not acting according to the rules of the game when he sweeps
off the figures, one who commits suicide is violating the rules of life when he
chooses suicide as solution to his problems. These rules do not demand being
victorious all the time and at all costs. They only ask that we do not give in and
leave the battlefield without a fight (p. 53).
In his work with people contemplating suicide in Vienna’s Steinhof Hospital
for the mentally sick, Frankl helped some 1,200 women to avoid suicide. His
method consisted of the following: First he would familiarize himself with the
personal background of the patient and then he would ask the patient whether
she still had suicidal thoughts. The patient would answer no, for she wanted to
leave the hospital to commit suicide. Then Frankl would ask why she no longer
had suicidal thoughts. If the patient was nervous, she would try to avoid eye con-
tact with him, and she couldn’t offer any reason why not to commit suicide
Frankl knew then that she posed a danger to herself. But if the patient answered
the same question by saying that she had a family to take care of, or that she had
a task to fulfill, then Frankl knew that this patient saw meaning in life and thus
posed no danger to herself.
When Frankl was incarcerated in a concentration camp, he realized that his
method worked well, for as long as prisoners attached meaning to their suffering,
as long as there was a loved person or an important goal that the prisoner wanted
to achieve, he or she would not commit suicide. Of course, any prisoner could die
in many different ways in a concentration camp, but discounting misfortune or
bad fate, such a prisoner was among the survivors (Klingberg, 2001, p. 78).
majority of these professionals are decent and law-abiding people, some of them
may think like the “good nurses” from Vienna.
Sometimes a patient may ask a nurse or a doctor for help in ending his or her
life, and the request sounds reasonable, for the patient can’t bear the suffering.
The patient is fully conscious, has control over his or her mental power, and
understands the meaning of the request—to die with dignity. Yet, even if the
request sounds reasonable, the helping professional must abide by the law.
Euthanasia is rejected almost universally. But beyond the written law, the
Hippocratic Oath, or the Code of Ethics of a given helping profession is the sixth
commandment in the Old Testament: “Do not kill”(Exodus 20: 13).
There have been heated debates about the rights of a terminally sick person to be
euthanized. In the center of this debate are questions such as: Isn’t it better for a ter-
minally sick old person to die, instead of suffering from untreatable illness? Does
this person have a right to ask a physician to end his or her suffering and help him
or her to end his life? The request by such a patient is an expression of the age-old
human quest to die with dignity and without suffering. This is the real meaning of
euthanasia today. Logotherapy does not accept “mercy killing” for any reason.
Euthanasia in its original meaning means this attitude toward death. The
author of this book has no interest in delving into issues of active or passive
euthanasia, or into issues of whether or not a patient has a right to control his or
her death. These issues are too complex for analysis in this book. Therefore, he
only wishes to concentrate on logotherapy’s attitude toward euthanasia. Let us
begin with an example from Frankl’s Psychotherapy for Every Man (1971).
An old and very industrious nurse in a hospital was sick with incurable cancer.
She was in despair for not being able to carry on her work and wished to die.
Before she could do any harm to herself, Frankl visited her to find out what he
could do to ease her suffering and despair, and to tell her that any person can work
hard, but not everybody can suffer with dignity. Frankl told her that now she had
been given an opportunity to show the other patients that the meaning of life is
not dependent on hard work alone, for if this were true, then none of the helpless
patients and disabled people had the right to live. There was still one thing that
this nurse could do: to serve as a model for others on how to die with dignity. The
nurse died a week later from natural causes.
Euthanasia in its narrowest sense means easing one’s suffering by taking
medications. The practice is treated as a “matter-of-fact” by all physicians and, as
such, does not cause any controversy. The problem with euthanasia centers on
ending a life considered not worthy of a human being by the doctors.
Logotherapists do not consider doctors the only authorities for decisions about
life and death. No doctor is God! If doctors are given the right to decide when
another person’s life becomes worthless, even if that person is considered med-
ically untreatable, then doctors have power that does not belong to the medical
profession. That is why logotherapy vehemently opposes any form of euthanasia.
Some politicians, journalists, and experts in public relations try to justify
euthanasia in cases of severe mental illness, by saying that it is better for them to
A Logotherapeutic Perspective on Death 157
die than to suffer, and it is better for society to use the resources allocated for the
care of those people in a more useful manner. Frankl rejects such claims altogether.
He emphasizes more convincing reasons for their rejection by logotherapists.
First of all, what does it mean to say that a patient has an incurable illness? He
presented a personal experience with the following case: a gravelly ill young man
was lying in a hospital for a long time, being fed through a tube in his nose. What
could be expected in this situation? Wasn’t it better for the patient to be
euthanized? The future provided the answers to these questions.
One day the young man sat up in his bed, asked for food, got out of bed to
exercise his legs, and behaved normally. Pretty soon the muscles in his legs had
strengthened so much that in a few weeks he left the hospital and returned to his
previous occupation. This patient, now cured, began to give lectures on his
experience in the hospital where he had spent five years. During those years he
observed human behavior, especially the behavior of doctors, nurses, and other
patients. If he had been “sentenced” to euthanasia, he would have missed out on
his new life.
What is considered today an incurable illness may become routinely cured
tomorrow with the help of new medications. And who could say with certainty
that there is nothing to do in a given case? Who would have imagined 100 years
ago that certain forms of mental illness can be cured or at least palliated?
Frankl objected to using illnesses that were incurable as justifications for
performing euthanasia It was his contention that we have no real knowledge
about human beings or about illnesses to claim with certainty that a patient
cannot be cured. And who gives the doctors the right to play God? Who gives
them the right to be the judge?
Since the days of Hippocrates a physician has had two purposes: to cure when
possible and to ease the suffering when curing was not possible. Therefore, a
doctor has no right—in fact, he or she is forbidden—to decide whether a person’s
life is worth living or not—even if this person suffers from an incurable illness.
Many doctors can testify about cases in which old patients in acute pain begged
them to end their suffering through euthanasia, only to return home happily and
full of plans after the crisis had gone by. If those patients could hear themselves
when they were brought to the hospital in dire condition, they wouldn’t believe
their own ears. They wouldn’t agree that they were the same people who cried
bitter tears and wanted to die by all means.
Man takes into consideration immortality and forgets to take into consideration
death. (Kundera, 1990, p. 74)
No one could begin life anew for we can never discover the sponge with which we
could erase the table of our life. (Ancsel, 1999, p. 128)
158 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
the living conditions of those who lack the resources for a dignified human
existence.
Longevity, which has doubled in the past 100 years, is a blessing for those who
are able to enjoy the benefits of modern medicine, science, and technology. As for
the others, longevity means adding years to their suffering and pain.
Swift’s book warns us against the endless pursuit of eternal life and advises that we
should devote our energies in living a good life, no matter if our life is short or long.
The subject of immortality continues to occupy an important place in human
endeavors. The mystery of life after death is part of all major religions. For these
the issue is a matter of belief, reward, or punishment.
The mystery of death has been the subject of many great works in literature,
music, and cinema. The Czech writer Milan Kundera, for example, has devoted
one of his works to this subject. His witty book Immortality (1990) attests to his
sense of humor, intelligence, and sharp eye. This work criticizes Western culture’s
perception of metaphysic existence.
In a most entertaining imaginary conversation between the philosopher and
poet Goethe, and the famous writer Ernest Hemingway, Goethe says that human
beings know that they are mortals; they know that there is death, and nevertheless
they are unable to accept it, to understand it, and to behave accordingly. A human
being does not know how to be mortal or how to become dead. Kundera adds,
“Now that he is already dead some one hundred fifty-six years, the time has come
to laugh at immortality and to use his being dead to go to sleep” (p. 291).
The immortality Kundera refers to in his book is not connected to the eternity
of the soul. For Kundera this concept has no religious connotations. Kundera’s
notion of immortality is interested only in what will remain in the memory of
future generations after one’s death. “Each human being can attain great or small
immortality, a short or a long one,” says Kundera (p. 49). There is a difference
between “small immortality—defined as the memory one leaves in the hearts of
those who knew him or her—and “great immortality”—that is, the memory one
leaves in the hearts of those who didn’t know him personally.
Great immortality, or eternal glory, is the domain of famous artists, military
leaders, and politicians. Kundera presents a third type of immortality, which he
calls “ridiculous,” and in which a famous person is caught in a ridiculous
situation. Of the three types of immortality, the last one is the one famous people
want to avoid.
A man’s life is like a clock, says Kundera: until a certain time death seems far
away and unworthy of thoughts, for it cannot be seen. This is the first and best
period of our lives. But then, all of a sudden, we begin to see death right before
our eyes, and we cannot stop thinking about it. Death remains with us. And since
immortality is inextricably connected to death, we can say that immortality, too,
remains with us, at least in thought. And as soon as we know that it is with us, we
begin to prepare ourselves to greet it. This is the second part of our lives. There is
also a third part, short and most mysterious, and about which we know very little.
The strength and vigor we used to have diminishes, and we tire easily. This is the
160 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
form of existence after death. Yet, in most cases the longing for immortality is
immediate.
If there were a conscious existence after death, Jung said, it would develop like
human consciousness toward greater heights. Many people, those who didn’t
achieve in their lives what others did, wish to attain immortality after death as a
compensation for this deficiency in their lives (Jung, Memories, Dreams and
Thoughts, p. 382).
Frankl agrees with Jung’s attitude to immortality and claims that human
beings do not want to accept that with death everything will cease for them.
Human beings can’t accept that one day they are here, and the next they are gone,
or that there is no answer to the question of where the dead have gone.
Immortality cannot be grasped by contemplation, the same way that one cannot
decide whether a pair of glasses is good by only looking at them: one can find out
only by looking through the glasses.
A spiritual personality remains accessible to others during his life and
afterward by his voice. Even someone who died a long time ago—a great artist
such as Caruso, for example—remains immortal through recordings of his voice.
A great scientist such as Einstein remains immortal through his invaluable
scientific contributions, which remain after his body no longer exists.
In death we lose our consciousness and the sense of time. A spiritual existence is
possible only in the spiritual dimension, not in the temporal one. And where there
is no time, there is no past, no present, no future, and no existence. Therefore, all
hypotheses about existence beyond the physical, the here and now, are groundless.
Logotherapy recognizes the importance of the values explicated in this book. It
recognizes and emphasizes first of all human beings as the supreme value.
Logotherapy insists that each human being is a world in itself—special, unique, and
unable to escape loneliness in the face of death. Yet every human being can cope
with death through love and choice. According to this philosophy of life and theory
of motivation, a human being can choose how he or she wants to live and die.
Logotherapy’s insistence on the unconditional meaningfulness of life; on
turning suffering into a human accomplishment; on deriving from guilt the
opportunity to change for the better; on seeing life as transitory and thus
requiring one to take responsible action; and, above all, on a person’s freedom to
choose a meaningful life, can all be helpful in alleviating fear of death in old age.
This idea is eloquently expressed by the poet Hayim Motalis (1996, p. 90),
whose poem I wish to present here (in my translation from Hebrew to English) to
sum up this book:
Say yes to life
Say yes to life,
And good morning to a new day,
Begin your day
In your old age
In hope and strength, without fear!
Memories and pictures
162 Finding Meaning in Life, at Midlife and Beyond
Adler, A. (1994). What Life Should Mean to You? Translated by S. Nyiro Jozsef, Budapest:
Kossuth Publisher. In Hungarian.
———. (1996). The Meaning of Life. Translated by S. Nyiro Jozsef. Budapest: Kossuth
Publisher. In Hungarian.
Agnon, S. J. (1960). “Hamalbush.” In Ad Hena. Jerusalem: Shoken Publisher, pp. 305–332.
In Hebrew.
Ancsel, E. (1995). Life as an Unknown Story. Budapest: Atlantisz. In Hungarian.
———. (1999). All Her Prefaces. Budapest: Kossuth Publisher. In Hungarian.
Ankori, M. (1991). The Heart and the Spring. Hasidism and Analytic Psychology. Tel Aviv:
Ramot Publisher. In Hebrew.
Balzac, H. de. (1991). Father Goriot. Translated by Lanyi Viktor. Budapest: Europa
Publisher. In Hungarian
Barker, R. L., (1999). The Social Work Dictionary. (4th ed) Silver Spring, MD: National
Association of Social Workers.
Batthyany, A. and Guttmann, D. (2005). Empirical Research in Logotherapy and Meaning-
Oriented Psychotherapy, an Annotated Bibliography. In collaboration with PsychINFO
(American Psychological Association). Phoenix, AZ: Zeig, Tucker &Theisen, Inc.
Baziz, O. (1997). “The Loneliness of Woman in the Works of David Shachar.” Moznayim
71(8): 11. In Hebrew.
Botton, de, A. (2000). The Consolations of Philosophy. London: Hamish Hamilton.
Brecht, B. (1990). “The Undignified Old Lady.” In Aging in the Mirror of Literature.
Translated by David Atar. Ramat Efal: Yad Tabenkin. In Hebrew.
Brody, S. (1995). The Zulu and the Zaide. Johannesburg: (Mimeo).
Buber, M. (1975). Between Man and Man. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co.
———. (1976). The Way of Man according to the Teaching of Hasidism. Secaucus, NJ: The
Citadel Press.
———. (1994). I and Thou. Translated by Biro Daniel. Budapest: Europa Publisher. In
Hungarian.
163
164 Bibliography
Bulgakov, M. (1993). The Devil in Moscow. Translated by Szollosy Klara. Budapest: Europa
Publisher. In Hungarian.
Bulka, R. P. (1989). “Jewish Humor—a Logotherapeutic Tool for Survival.” The Proceedings
of the Seventh World Congress of Logotherapy, pp. 50–58. Berkeley: Institute of
Logotherapy Press.
Camus, A. (1955). The Myth of Sisyphus and Other Essays. Translated by Justin O’Brian.
New York: A. Knopf. In French.
———. (1991). The Plague and the Myth of Sysiphus. Budapest: Europa Publisher.
Cicero, M. T. (1909). On Old Age. New York: P. F. Collier and Son.
Cohen, A. (1994). Homour-therapy. Haifa: Amatzya Press. In Hebrew.
———. (2003). Chained to the Rock of their Loneliness. Nefesh, Vols. 13–14, April,
pp. 5–24. In Hebrew.
Conrad, J. (1990). Heart of Darkness. London: Hoddler and Staughton.
Cousins, N. (1981). Anatomy of an Illness as Perceived by the Patient. New York: Bantam
Publisher.
Cronstrom-Beskow, S. (1991). “Coping Strategies in Death Camps.” The International
Forum for Logotherapy, Journal of Search for Meaning, pp. 92–96.
Dalai Lama (His Holiness). (1999). Ethics for the New Millenium. New York: Riverhead
Books.
De Botton, A. (2000). The Consolations of Philosophy. London: Hamish Hamilton.
Dickens, C. (1974). Oliver Twist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Einstein, A. (1934). The World as I See it. (Mein Weltbild). Translated by Szecsi Ferenc.
Budapest: Gladiator Publisher. In Hungarian.
Ellis, A. and Velten, E. (1998). Optimal Aging: Get Over Getting Older. Chicago: Open Court.
Erikson, E. H. (1959). “Identity and the Lifecycle.” Psychological Issues 1: 1. New York:
International Universities Press.
———. (1964). Insight and Responsibility. New York: Norton and Co.
———. (1968). Childhood and Society. New York: Norton and Co.
Frankl, V. E. (1962). Man’s Search for Meaning, an Introduction to Logotherapy: A Revised
and Enlarged Edition of From Death Camp to Existentialism. New York: A Touchstone
Book.
———. (1971). Psychotherapie für jedermann. (12th ed) Freiburg: Herder Publisher.
———. (1978). The Unheard Cry for Meaning. New York: Simon and Schuster.
———. (1982) Trotzdem ja zum Leben sagen: Ein Psychologe Erlebt das Konzentrationslager.
München: Kosel Verlag. In German.
———. (1985a). The Unconscious God: Logotherapy and Religion. New York: Washington
Square Press.
———. (1985b). The Will to Meaning. Tel Aviv: Dvir Publisher. In Hebrew.
———. (1986). The Doctor and the Soul: From Psychotherapy to Logotherapy. New York:
Vintage Books.
———. (1995). Was nicht in meinen Buchern steht: Lebenserinnerungen. München:
Quintessenz. In German.
———. (1996). Der Mensch vor der Frage nach dem Sinn, 1989. Translated by Maria Molnar
and Schaffhauser Ferenc. Budapest: Kotet Kiado. In Hungarian.
———. (1997a). Man’s Search for Ultimate Meaning. New York: Insight Books, Plenum
Press.
———. (1997b). Viktor Frankl Recollections, an Autobiography. New York: Plenum Press.
Bibliography 165
Freud, S. (1950). Totem and Taboo: Some Points of Agreement between the Mental Lives of
Savages and Neurotics. Translated and edited by James Strachey. New York: W. W.
Norton & Company.
———. (1982). “The Joke and Its Relationship to the Unconscious.” In Essays. Translated
by Bart Istvan. Budapest: Gondolat Publisher. In Hungarian.
———. (1991). Zur Psychopathologie des Alltagslebens. Budapest: Cserepfalvi. In Hungarian.
———. (1994). Introduction to Psychoanalysis. (2nd ed) Translated by Hermann Imre.
Budapest: Gondolat Publisher. In Hungarian.
———. (2002). Civilization and Its Discontents. New York: Penguin Books.
Fried, H. (1989). “Café Stockholm 84: A Unique day Program for Jewish Survivors.” In
Aging in the Jewish World, Jerusalem: Brookdale Institute for Research in Aging,
pp. 163–167.
Gary, R. (1980). The Dread of King Salomon. Translated by Inbar Avital. Tel Aviv: Am Oved.
In Hebrew.
Gibson, H. B. (2000). Loneliness in Later Life. London: MacMillan Press.
Gray, R. (1965). “Goethe’s Faust Part One.” Cambridge Quarterly 1(2): 125–143.
Green, M. (1990). The Robinson Crusoe Story. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State Press.
Gullan-Whur, M. (2002). “Struggling to Be Happy—Even When I’m Old.” Journal of
Applied Philosophy 19(1): 17–30.
Guttmann, D. and Lowenstein, A. (1992). “Psychosocial Problems and the Needs of the
Elderly in Mental Health.” In F. J. Turner (Ed.) Mental Health and the Elderly. New York:
The Free Press, pp. 478–502.
Guttmann, D. and Cohen, B. Z. (1993). “On the Relationship between Meaning-in-Life and
Excessive Behaviors among the Active Elderly in Israel.” Journal des Viktor-Frankl-Instituts
1(2): 38–55.
Guttmann, D. (1994). “Meaningful Aging: Establishing a Club for Survivors of the
Holocaust in Hungary.” Journal des Viktor-Frankl-Instituts 2(1): 67–73.
———. (1996). Logotherapy for the Helping Professional: Meaningful Social Work. New
York: Springer.
———. (1997). “Homo Elector and Homo Patiens: Fate, Choice, Suffering and Meaning in
the Works of Szondi and Frankl.” Journal des Viktor-Frankl-Instituts 5(1): 66–81.
Harel, N. (1981). “Koby Knows.” Stories from the Collective House. Jerusalem: Keter
Publishing. In Hebrew.
Hassan, J. (1992). Creative Approaches to Working with Holocaust Survivors. London:
(Mimeo).
Hemingway, E. (1995). The Old Man and the Sea. New York: Charles Scribner & Sons.
Hrabal, B. (1994). Too Noisy Silence. Translated by Ruth Bondi. Tel Aviv: Aked/Gvanim
Publishers. In Hebrew.
———. (1997). The Millions of Harlekin. Translated by Detri Zsuzsa. Budapest: Europa. In
Hungarian.
———. (2001). Memories of a Class Repeater. Translated by Kortvelyessy Klara. Budapest:
Europa. In Hungarian.
Jacobson, S. (1995). Toward a Meaningful Life: The Wisdom of the Rebbe Menachem Mendel
Schneerson. New York: William Morrow and Co.
Jewish Encyclopedia. (1907). New York and London: Funk and Wagnalls.
Jung, C. G. (1954). “The Practice of Psychotherapy.” (Vol. 16) In The Collected Works of C.
G. Jung. London: Routledge.
166 Bibliography
———. (1993). On the Paths of Our Depths. Translated by Bodrog Vilmos. Budapest:
Gondolat. In Hungarian.
———. (1997). Memories, Dreams, and Thoughts. Translated by Kovacs Vera. Budapest:
Europa. In Hungarian.
———. (1998). “The Stages of Life.” In Aging Concepts & Controversies (2nd ed), ed. Harry
R. Moody. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press, pp. 452–455.
Kalmar, S. (1997). “About Guilt and Guilt Feelings.” Journal des Viktor-Frankl-Instituts 5(1):
101–108.
Kierkegaard, S. (1954). Fear and Trembling and the Sickness unto Death. Translated by
Walter Lowrie. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday. In Danish.
———. (1971). Either/Or. Translated by D. F. Swenson and L. M. Swenson. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
———. (1991). The Concept of Dread. Translated by Racz Peter. Budapest: Goncol
Publisher. In Hungarian.
———. (1993). The Mortal Illness. Translated by Racz Peter. Budapest: Goncol Publisher.
In Hungarian.
Klingberg, H. Jr. (2001). When Life Calls Out to Us: The Love and Lifework of Viktor and Elly
Frankl. The Story behind Man’s Search for Meaning. New York: Doubleday.
Kundera, M. (1990). Immortality. Translated by Ruth Bondi Tel Aviv: Zmora-Bitan
Publishers. In Hebrew.
Leibovits, Y. (1999). I Wanted to Ask You, Professor Leibovits: Letters to Professor Leibovits and
from Him. Jerusalem: Keter. In Hebrew.
Lukacs, J. (2001). Confessions of an Original Sinner. Translated by Barkoczi Andras.
Budapest: Europa. In Hungarian.
Lukas, E. (1986a). Meaningful Living: A Logotherapeutic Guide to Health. Foreword by V. E.
Frankl. An Institute of Logotherapy Press Book. New York: Grove Press.
———. (1986b). Meaning in Suffering: Comfort in Crisis through Logotherapy. Translated by
Joseph B. Fabry. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Logotherapy Press.
Mann. T. (1955). The Magic Mountain. Translated by Mordechai Avi-Shaul. Tel Aviv: Sifriat
Poalim. In Hebrew.
———. (1994). Death in Venice. Translated by Lanyi Viktor. Budapest: Europa Publisher.
In Hungarian.
Motalis, H. (1996). “Say Yes to Life.” Gerontology 75: 90. In Hebrew.
Nagy, E. (2000). Guide for the Aged. Budapest: Noran. In Hungarian.
Nietzsche, F. (1997a). Ecce Homo: How One Becomes What One Is. Budapest: Goncol
Publisher.
———. (1997b). The Gay Science. Translated by Torok Gabor. Budapest: Holnap Kiado. In
Hungarian.
———. (2004). My Sister and Me. Translated by Yeshayahu Yariv. Tel Aviv: Yediot Ahronot
Publications. In Hebrew.
Olson, L. K., ed. (1994). The Graying of the World. New York: The Haworth Press.
Raz, S. (1986). A Very Narrow Bridge: The Sayings of Rabbi Nachman of Breslav. Jerusalem:
Keter. In Hebrew.
Rubinstein, R. L. (1986). Singular Paths: Old Men Living Alone. New York: Columbia
University Press, pp. 181–192.
Russell, B. (1956). Reflections on My Eightieth Birthday. New York: Simon and Schuster.
———. (1967). The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell. Vol. 1. London: Allen and Unwin.
Scheler, M. (1960). On the Eternal in Man. London: SCM Press Ltd.
Bibliography 167
———. (1973). Formalism in Ethics and Non-Formal Ethics of Values. Evanston, IL:
Northwestern University Press.
Schopenhauer, A. (2001). Life Wisdom. Translated by Dr. Kelen Ferenc. Budapest: Szukits
Kiado. In Hungarian.
Schweitzer, A. (1999). Honor of Life. Translated by Dani Laszlo. Budapest: Ursus Publisher.
In Hungarian.
Scully, M. “Viktor Frankl at Ninety: An Interview.” First Things The Journal of Religion,
Culture and Public Life 52: 39–43.
Seneca, L. A. (1997). On Mental Calmness and on the Brevity of Life. Translated by Bollok
Janos. Budapest: Seneca Press. In Hungarian.
———. (2001). Letters on Morality. Translated by Kurcz Agnes. Budapest: Europa
Publisher. In Hungarian.
Shakespeare, W. (1947). As You Like It. III, 2. The Works of William Shakespeare, London:
P. J. Basil Blackwell.
Solomon, D., Weinberg, J., Slaigh, M., and Ilani, Z. (1989). Aging according to Israeli Sources.
Jerusalem, Israel: Jewish Torah Publisher. In Hebrew.
Sternig (1984). “Finding Meaning through Existential Guilt.” The International Forum for
Logotherapy: Journal of Search for Meaning 4: 79–82.
Swift, J. (1962). Gulliver’s Travels. New York: MacMillan.
Szalay, K. (1983). Komikum, Szatira, Humor. Budapest: Kossuth Publisher. In Hungarian.
Szondi, L. (1937). “Analysis of Marriages. An Attempt at a Theory of Choice in Love.” Acta
Psychologica 3(1): 1–80. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
———. (1987). Cain the Offender of Law, Moses the Creator of Law. Budapest: Gondolat
Publisher. In Hungarian.
———. (1996a). The Languages of the Unconscious: Symptom, Symbol and Choice.”
Thalassa 96(2): 61–82. In Hungarian.
———. (1996b). “The Way to Manhood.” Thalassa 96(2): 39–60. In Hungarian.
Takashima, H. (1984). Humanistic Psychosomatic Medicine. A Logotherapy Book. Berkeley,
CA: Institute of Logotherapy Press.
Talmudic Encyclopedia (1978). Jerusalem: Talmudic Encyclopedia Institute. In Hebrew.
Tamaro, S. (1996). To Follow Your Heart. Translated by Anat Spitzen. Tel Aviv: Modan. In
Hebrew.
Tolstoy, L. (1992). The Death of Ivan Illich. Translated by Gellert Gyorgy. Budapest: Europa
Publisher. In Hungarian.
Volicki, M. (1987). “Despair—An ‘Absolutization’ of Values.” The International Forum for
Logotherapy Journal of Search for Meaning 5(1): 50–51.
Volkov, L. (1992). To Be a Son to an Old Parent: A Phase in the Family’s Life Cycle Crisis. Tel
Aviv: Ramot Publisher. In Hebrew.
Webster’s New Universal Unabridged Dictionary (2nd ed.) (1986). Cleveland: New World
Publication.
Wiesel, E. (1993). Souls on Fire. New York: Touchstone.
Wilde, Oscar. (1990). The Selfish Giant, cited in David Atar’s Aging in the Mirror of
Literature. Ramat Efal: Yad Tabenkin. In Hebrew.
Yalom, I. E. (1980). Existential Psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
This page intentionally left blank
Index
169
170 Index
177