Gender and Chinese History
Gender and Chinese History
Gender and Chinese History
& Chinese
U
ni
ve
History
rs
tyi
of
W
as
hi
ng
to
n
Transformative
Pr
Encounters
es
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any
rs
information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
ty
www.washington.edu/uwpress
W
HQ1767.G457 2015
304.420951—dc23 2014047603
to
The paper used in this publication is acid-free and meets the minimum requirements of
n
Acknowledgments ix
rs
Note on Terminology xi
tyi
Chronology xii
of
Introduction
Beverly Bossler 3
W
Part One
as
Chapter one
ng
Chapter two
The Control of Female Energies: Gender
es
Chapter three
Collecting Masculinity: Merchants and Gender
Performance in Eighteenth-Century China
Yulian Wu 59
Chapter four
Writing Love: The Heming ji by Wang Zhaoyuan and Hao Yixing
Weijing Lu 83
Part Two
“Cloistered Ladies” to New Women
Chapter five
“Media-Savvy” Gentlewomen of the 1870s and Beyond
U
Ellen Widmer 113
ni
Chapter six
ve
Joan Judge 139
i ty
Chapter seven
of
Part Three
as
Chapter eight
ng
Emily Honig 185
n
Chapter nine
Pr
Bad Transmission
Gail Hershatter 209
es
Bibliography 235
List of Contributors 257
Index 261
Acknowledgments
U
ni
ve
China to assess the state of the subfield. What had been accomplished?
Where were the gaps in our knowledge? How had our studies of gender
as
in China changed the way we thought about Chinese history and about
hi
gender itself? And most important, how could we take research on gender
in China in new and exciting directions? Some of our answers to these
ng
questions can be found in this volume. Our seminar was also enhanced
to
den and Catherine Kudlick (both European historians) and Margery Wolf
Pr
appears in these pages: collectively they represent some of the field’s most
accomplished scholars and some of its most promising young intellects.
I thank all of them for their patience as I completed other projects before
turning to this one. I am especially grateful to Ellen Widmer for offering
assistance and encouraging me to persevere, and to Gail Hershatter for pro-
viding advice and humor on countless occasions. I thank the group as well
ix
for their exemplary adherence to deadlines and responsiveness to queries,
which made the job of editor straightforward and rewarding.
Publication of this volume would not have been possible without the
encouragement, support, and critical expertise of Lorri Hagman at the
University of Washington Press, who shepherded us though the acceptance
process and provided expert guidance on all matters editorial. Tim Zim-
mermann likewise patiently fielded endless questions about the illustrations,
and Jacqueline Volin patiently oversaw the production process. I extend
our thanks to each of them. The thoughtful comments of two anonymous
U
readers were also instrumental in improving the individual papers and the
coherence of the volume as a whole.
ni
and affection.
BJB
W
as
hi
ng
to
n
Pr
es
s
x Acknowledgments
Note on Ter minology
U
ni
ve
In China before the twentieth century, age was counted in sui. A child was
rs
deemed to be one sui at birth and became another sui older at each New Year.
i ty
Thus a child born in the twelfth month, shortly before the New Year, would
be counted as two sui when, by Western count, she was only a month old. In
of
enter the prestigious and lucrative career of official bureaucrat. The system
had three tiers: a young man first had to pass the county-level examination,
ng
at which point he would receive the sheng yuan degree. That qualified him to
to
became a celebrated jinshi. The examinations were held every three years, on
a rotating basis. At each stage of the examinations, candidates who passed
es
were ranked: the man who attained the top-ranked jinshi degree in his
cohort was called a zhuang yuan; he was assured of national fame and in
s
xi
Chronology
U
ni
ve
Tang 618–907
hi
Ming 1368–1644
Qing (Manchu) 1644–1911
n
xii
s
es
Pr
n
to
Gender and Chinese History
ng
hi
as
W
of
ity
rs
ve
ni
U
U
ni
ve
Introduction
rs
i
Beverly Bossler
ty
of
W
W
cal inquiry.
to
ing entities, or perhaps the study of ideas, as in the rise of the Renaissance
and the Enlightenment. Likewise in the case of China, where a powerful and
s
respected historical tradition was established more than two thousand years
ago, “history” until well into the twentieth century focused especially on the
rise and fall of dynasties or on developments in Confucian and Buddhist
thought. In the mid-twentieth century, the introduction of the “new social
history” expanded the purview of “history” to include the study of social
groups, categories, and forces that had seemingly little connection to politi-
3
cal or intellectual developments. In new historical studies of both the West
and (somewhat later) China, one of the social groups that began to receive
attention was women, and one of the social categories identified as impor-
tant (along with class and ethnicity) was gender. As topics such as women
and family became the focus of historical inquiry, the meaning of “history”
itself began to change: it turned out that gender had a very close connection
to political and intellectual developments and, indeed, was crucial to under-
standing them.
What we mean by “China” might seem more obvious and concrete, but
U
in fact there were and are many “Chinas,” especially if we consider change
over time. Even today, “China” incorporates many ethnic populations, and
ni
contested question. In the past, the situation was even more complicated: for
centuries at a time, the area we now call China was divided into competing
rs
small states; during other periods, China was subsumed into larger empires
i ty
existed. We use “China,” then, as shorthand, in full awareness that the term
obscures important temporal and geographical variation.
as
What then of “gender”? Certainly “male” and “female” were and are
hi
ety, the animal world, and even physical phenomena. Yet some scholars have
to
argued that “gender” operated differently in the Chinese past than in Europe
or even in the Chinese present. According to this argument, in the European
n
tradition “man” and “woman” were understood as among the most funda-
Pr
divisions of male and female were subsumed in other, more specific social
categories based in family relations (such as “son,” “daughter,” “father,”
s
4 Beverly Bossler
The historical implications of this analysis are admittedly still controversial,
but the larger point here is that studying how gender hierarchies operated
in China forces us to confront the limited and culturally bounded nature
of concepts of gender—including those typically employed in Anglophone
scholarship. In other words, we are challenged to rethink how we under-
stand the idea of gender itself.
In short, by using the phrase “gender and Chinese history” in the title of
this book, we do not mean to designate a concrete, bounded topic but rather
to point to a field of scholarly inquiry, the terms of which are fluid, constantly
U
Some sense of this process and its salutary effects can be illustrated first
and foremost by reviewing how attention to gender has changed some of the
rs
has already extensively cataloged the contributions that the study of women
and gender has made to the field of twentieth-century Chinese history; like-
of
wise, research on women, family, and gender has altered our understanding
of the premodern, or imperial, period of Chinese history.3
W
study of women in China’s past was possible. As early as the 1970s, impor-
hi
tures looked very different when they were viewed from the perspective of
to
not exist. Women in imperial China were largely illiterate and cloistered
Pr
within their homes, so the received wisdom went, so they left no informa-
tion about themselves. Moreover, since elite men’s lives were devoted to
es
the examination system and government service, from which women were
barred, the sources they left us had nothing significant to say about women.
s
Introduction 5
the imperial palace.5 Patricia Ebrey mined funerary inscriptions, household
handbooks, and anecdotal literature to elucidate the nature of family rela-
tions in the Song period.6 Over the course of the 1980s, scholars also began
to explore the significant roles women played in Buddhism and other Chi-
nese religious traditions; documented the achievement and long-standing
recognition of Chinese women painters; and showed how educated wives
and daughters were central to literati family strategies in the late imperial
period.7 By the 1990s, no one could suggest that sources for the study of
women in imperial China were lacking.
U
Over the course of the succeeding decades, research on women and gen-
der began to reshape much of our basic understanding of Chinese history.
ni
Susan Mann’s pathbreaking work on women and gender in the Qing dynasty
ve
demonstrated that, far from being irrelevant to the male world of politics
and governance, women were a central focus of it. Emperors, bureaucrats,
rs
and philosophers alike saw the actions of women as critical to the overall
i ty
peace and prosperity of the empire.8 Individual families and the empire as a
whole relied on the economic contributions of women, their production of
of
cloth and other household goods.9 Literati families relied as well on wom-
en’s financial-management skills, for women managing the family budget
W
allowed men to focus on their studies.10 At court, women used their influence
on emperors to shape and even control government policy.11 And all fami-
as
ing how Chinese reformers (mostly male) in the late nineteenth and early
Pr
twentieth centuries justified their calls for social change in part by erasing
the long-standing tradition of female literacy. Ko argued to the contrary that
es
literate women had helped fuel a dramatic expansion of printing in the late
Ming dynasty, and she drew the attention of the Anglophone scholarly world
s
6 Beverly Bossler
permitted a new and more complex understanding of women’s roles in the
gender system in which they lived. While some writings by women indeed
complained of the restrictions and limitations of the Chinese gender sys-
tem, others detailed the satisfactions available to women in their varied roles
as wives, mothers, and grandmothers. Even bound feet, generally regarded
as the quintessential symbol of Chinese women’s suffering and oppression,
turned out to have had very different and frequently positive meanings in
the eyes of women who possessed them. We learned that, as a sign of beauty,
disciplined cultivation, and Chinese ethnicity, bound feet could be experi-
U
and elsewhere today) offered women rewards as well as injustices, and that
ve
the figure of the faithful woman (jie fu) in Chinese culture. Like the bound
i ty
elty to women. In the late imperial period, two kinds of faithful women had
been valorized. One category consisted of widows who refused to remarry
W
after their husbands died. The other category included women who were
martyrs to an ideal of bodily purity, who chose suicide rather than tolerate
as
In reformist rhetoric of the late nineteenth century and beyond, both types
of women figured as pathetic victims of China’s pathological gender system.
ng
Over the past three decades, scholarship on what is often called the
“fidelity cult” has challenged this picture on many fronts. This scholarship
es
has shown the significant ways that demands for female fidelity evolved
over time, while also tracing the cult’s disparate institutional structures and
s
Introduction 7
afterward, Susan Mann showed in even greater detail how and why the
early Qing dynasty government attempted to redirect the fidelity cult away
from martyrdom by providing incentives for maintaining faithful widows
in the household.17 A few years later, T’ien Ju-K’ang demonstrated that the
cult of fidelity, and especially widow suicide, had expanded dramatically in
the Ming dynasty, and argued that one important force behind the cult was
the tendency of literati men to write about faithful women to assuage their
own frustrations and anxieties about the competitive society in which they
lived.18 In the 1990s, Katharine Carlitz advanced our understanding of the
U
cult with several articles that explored the popularity (and novelistic attrac-
tion) of texts extolling faithful female exemplars; she also detailed the use-
ni
elucidated the ways that state and family concerns about loyalty and widows’
i ty
property intersected in the cult during the Qing dynasty, while Janet Theiss
demonstrated the complicated and often unexpected ways that the cult was
of
used and abused to advance the varied interests of women, their families,
and the state in that period.20 The emotional, social, and political signifi-
W
cance of the cult was further explored in Weijing Lu’s 2008 study of one of
its more extreme manifestations: “faithful maidens.” These were women who
as
their deceased fiancés. All these scholars showed that the cult of fidelity in
imperial China was a complex and contested phenomenon, shaped and used
ng
their lives.21
The topic of female fidelity in China is also closely related to women’s
n
property rights and their evolution over the course of the imperial period.
Pr
erty rights over the course of the Song, Yuan, and Ming dynasties, showing
that both developments tied women more closely to their marital families.22
s
8 Beverly Bossler
that success of such laws was also related to the efforts of neo-Confucian
philosophers to impose a stricter standard of female morality on the popu-
lace.23 Kathryn Bernhardt, conversely, asserted that laws established by the
first Ming emperor created the most dramatic change in women’s property
rights, and suggested that, paradoxically, the fidelity cult helped to amelio-
rate the most stringent aspects of the new laws: worried that families could
abuse the law to gain widows’ property, judges tended to award faithful wid-
ows the right to appoint their own heirs and control property in trust for
them.24
U
As T’ien, Carlitz, and others had shown, the fidelity cult was inextricably
associated with men’s writing about women, and critical evaluation of tradi-
ni
tions of women’s biography has also proven to be a fruitful window into his-
ve
torical change in the Chinese gender system. Lisa Raphals’s 1998 monograph
demonstrated that ideas about yin and yang became more hierarchical over
rs
the course of the classical period, and she showed how late imperial redac-
i ty
tual virtue.25 My own recent work locates the rise of the fidelity cult in new
trends in men’s writing about women in the late Song and Yuan, trends that
W
cult were cyclical, with female loyalty taking on intensified salience at times
of political or social instability.26 The importance of biography as a source
ng
for the history of women and gender was also highlighted in a wide-ranging
to
volume edited by Joan Judge and Hu Ying in 2011. The essays in that vol-
ume demonstrate the diversity and flexibility of the biographical tradition
n
In their own work, both Judge and Hu have demonstrated how the genre of
biographies of exemplary women was expanded and reconfigured at the end
es
of the imperial era, as male authors proposed new kinds of heroines as more
appropriate models for women in a modern nation-state.28
s
Introduction 9
ernment were a relatively recent phenomenon.29 Later studies examined legal
statutes governing homosexuality, suggesting that the government’s concern
was not male-male relationships per se but the maintenance of proper social
hierarchies and the protection of young males from sexual exploitation.30
Another scholar argued that Qing dynasty sources reveal multiple and vary-
ing understandings of male homosexuality, including some recognition of
the possibility that male homosexual desire might be an innate character-
istic of some men.31 In 2000, a forum sponsored by the American Histori-
cal Association moved beyond the issue of sexuality to consider other types
U
explored in a special issue of the journal Nan Nü, which featured a group of
ve
attract the attention of scholars, though to date the topic of masculinity has
i ty
been probed largely through literary texts. Although their specific findings
differ, scholars have agreed that masculinity in imperial China was closely
of
tied to social and perhaps political status, with different modes of masculin-
ity operating in different social strata. They are also generally agreed that
W
texts, and how it changed over time. (Chapter 3, by Yulian Wu, addresses
to
these issues.)
As this brief (and far from exhaustive) review of recent scholarship sug-
n
nese history in several important ways. It has revealed the imperial state’s
commitment to a gender order that it saw as both ordained by heaven and
es
critical to the state’s own survival, while also showing the flexible ways that
the gender order could be deployed. It has demonstrated the inextricable
s
links between the gender order, the Chinese family system, and wider social
and political phenomena. Most importantly, it has shown the ways that
women and men worked within and around the demands of a hierarchical
gender system to pursue their own interests and agendas. Scholarship on
the gender system of imperial history has also been important in increasing
our understanding of the political and social history of twentieth-century
10 Beverly Bossler
China. As already noted, early-twentieth-century reformers helped justify
their own policies and power by castigating the “backward” gender system
of the imperial period. But as scholarship on the modern period has shown,
many aspects of that system have continued to be salient in the twentieth
century and beyond. To cite but one example: female fidelity and sexual
purity were, ironically, key characteristics of the heroines that the Chinese
Communist Party created to model their new socialist morality.35
The present volume builds on the rich legacy of the existing scholarship by
U
mon themes across widely separated eras. Ann Waltner’s chapter, which
i ty
opens the volume, conspicuously probes the limits of historical sources and
what we can know. The historiographical concerns she raises are taken up
of
in later chapters by Yulian Wu, Ellen Widmer, Joan Judge, Emily Honig,
and Gail Hershatter, all of whom turn to unconventional sources, or use
W
the eighteenth, those who ruled China saw proper gender relations as key
to
over time.
Pr
women’s education, and Judge describes a similar tension between the liter-
ary education of “women of talent” and twentieth-century efforts to extend
s
education to more women. Weijing Lu, Widmer, Judge, and Yan Wang reveal
the multiplicity of ways that women used writing—in poetry, political tracts,
and family letters—to assert their identities and shape their interactions
with the wider world. The chapters by Widmer, Judge, and Wang also show
how differently women could experience and respond to the same historical
circumstances.
Introduction 11
All the chapters reveal how a focus on specific cases and intimate interac-
tions can inform our understanding of larger social change. All expose the
intricate connections between historical shifts in gender relations and other
forms of social and historical change (economic growth, political change,
new media). And all repeatedly remind us that the Chinese gender system
was never static.
The chapters in this volume cluster in three key time periods: the eigh-
teenth century, when imperial China was at the height of its power and
prosperity (chapters 1 through 4); the late nineteenth and early twentieth
U
(chapters 5 through 7); and the latter half of the twentieth century, which
ve
included both the radical social experiments of the Maoist period and the
equally dramatic changes brought about by “socialist capitalism” under the
rs
Reform period (chapters 8 and 9). In the first two sets of chapters, the reader
i ty
will encounter the term late imperial, which is commonly used in historical
studies of China to designate the Ming and Qing dynasties.36 A few authors,
of
In the opening chapter of the volume, Ann Waltner literally alters our
hi
with what we know about Chinese weddings from Chinese textual sources
exposes transcultural similarities in gender regimes (for example, in both
n
pean fantasies of exotic Chinese practices). Waltner’s analysis also shows that
gender relations are a touchstone for cultural interaction, and that the lens
s
12 Beverly Bossler
was known for his commitment to Confucian moral transformation but also
for his sympathetic and practical understanding of the realities of life on the
empire’s margins. Li elucidates the concrete measures by which Lan sought
to promulgate Confucian “family values” at the local level, showing how his
methods were influenced by his understanding of ethnic difference. She also
notes the surprising resonances between Lan’s views and those of moderniz-
ing reformers more than a century later: although those reformers explicitly
rejected Lan’s Confucian morality, they shared his assumption that women’s
behavior was crucial to the success of the state, as well as his conviction that
U
women required the guidance and direction of men. Finally, Li’s chapter
highlights the close association in Lan’s mind between female virtue and
ni
female labor: as we see in chapters 7, 8, and 9, the idea that women’s virtue
ve
was tied to women’s labor persisted well into the modern period.
Yulian Wu, in chapter 3, turns away from men’s actions in relation to
rs
women to consider gender relations among men and, especially, the inter-
i ty
sections of class and masculinity. From early imperial times, merchants had
been disdained in Chinese society and were considered socially and mor-
of
ally inferior to scholars. Wu shows how gender played into this social equa-
tion, examining the ways that a wealthy eighteenth-century merchant, Wang
W
merchants like Wang were able to upend age-old moral codes and assert that
the ability to accumulate wealth was itself a sign of masculine achievement.
ng
in the poetry volume they jointly compiled. Lu shows that their writings
not only illuminate their own romantic and intellectual intimacy but also
es
Introduction 13
Widmer argues that the changes began much earlier than we generally
assume: she demonstrates that, already in the 1870s, educated upper-class
women had begun to publish their poetry in the new media of newspapers
and literary supplements. Widmer shows how the publication of women’s
writing in the new media represented both a continuity with traditional
practices and an important departure from them. She concludes that the
new media provided a venue for a new kind of public interaction among
women, creating, she suggests, “the idea of a national forum for women.”
In chapter 6, Joan Judge considers the ways that women’s writing prac-
U
tices—as well as ideas about women’s talent and the nature of women’s edu-
cation—changed in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Judge
ni
investigates the activities and experiences of three women from a single fam-
ve
ily, whose adult lives spanned a period from the 1870s to the 1960s. Extending
the trajectory of women’s learning explored by Widmer in chapter 5, Judge
rs
shows how, over the course of the early twentieth century, the poetry of classi-
i ty
cally educated “women of talent” evolved into expository (and often politically
directed) prose. By analyzing photographs of her subjects, Judge also delin-
of
eates an equally dramatic shift in the ways that the ideal female was visualized
during this period. Judge’s findings ultimately lead her to take issue with the
W
widely held view that the 1911 Revolution was a “nonevent.” Instead, she con-
cludes, the Revolution was a significant turning point in terms of modes of
as
a literary talent like the women studied by Lu, Widmer, and Judge. Rather,
Pr
Lady Zhuang’s life is interesting (and documented) because she became the
younger, successor wife of the powerful and wealthy modernizing official
es
14 Beverly Bossler
how quickly and creatively erstwhile “genteel ladies” responded to the new
opportunities of the twentieth century, as well as the variety of forms their
responses could take.
The final two chapters of the volume bring us into recent times, with
both Emily Honig and Gail Hershatter considering how events of the Mao-
ist period have been understood and reinterpreted during the era of post-
Mao reforms. Honig’s innovative chapter explores the “life history” not of
a person but of an iconic Maoist slogan: “The times have changed; men and
women are the same. Anything male comrades can do, female comrades
U
can do too.” Honig’s deft analysis reveals the surprising origins of the slogan
and the very gradual process by which it became prevalent. Although the
ni
also suggest how profoundly our knowledge of the past is shaped by both
inadvertent and deliberate misremembering.
of
The topic of memory and its relationship to history is taken up even more
explicitly in Gail Hershatter’s chapter. Hershatter probes the disjunction
W
sive interviews with an elderly mother and her middle-aged daughter, Her-
hi
shatter uncovers the disparate ways they understand the past and each other.
In the process, she also reveals the complex and convoluted manner in which
ng
the understanding of female virtue has changed over the last half century or so
to
we find clues to the ways that stories of the past are “heard and reencoded in
Pr
China’s gender regime and leave us with a heightened sense of the ways that
visions of the past are shaped by contemporary concerns.
s
Introduction 15
Notes
1 Barlow, “Theorizing Woman,” 253–89. See also Rowe, “Women and the Family,” 2–7.
2 Barlow, “Theorizing Woman,” 259.
3 Hershatter, Women in China’s Long Twentieth Century.
4 Wolf, Women and the Family; see also the various essays collected in Young, Women
in China and in Wolf and Witke, Women in Chinese Society.
5 Holmgren, “Family, Marriage and Political Power”; “Observations on Marriage and
Inheritance; “Imperial Marriage; Chung, Palace Women.
6 Ebrey, Family and Property; “The Early Stages”; “Concubines in Sung China.”
7 Levering, “The Dragon Girl”; Cahill, “Performers and Female Taoist Adepts” (see
U
also her Transcendence and Divine Passion), as well as Despeux and Kohn, Women
ni
“Imperial Marriage.”
9 Mann, Precious Records, 143–77; Ebrey, The Inner Quarters, 131–51; Bray, Technology
rs
and Gender.
i
10 Birge, “Chu Hsi and Women’s Education”; Mann, “Widows”; Ebrey, The Inner Quar-
ty
“Gender and Entertainment at the Song Court”; Lee, Empresses, Art, and Agency;
Ebrey, “Empress Xiang.”
W
12 Furth, A Flourishing; Bray, Technology and Gender; Lee, “Gender and Medicine”;
Wu, Reproducing Women.
as
15 Mann, Precious Records; The Talented Women; Ko, Teachers of the Inner Chambers;
Cinderella’s Sisters.
to
19 Carlitz, “Desire, Danger, and the Body”; “The Daughter, the Singing-Girl”; “Shrines”;
“The Social Uses.”
es
16 Beverly Bossler
29 Hinsch, Passions of the Cut Sleeve.
30 Sommer, “The Penetrated Male”; Sex, Law, and Society; “Dangerous Males.”
31 Szonyi, “The Cult of Hu Tianbao.”
32 Mann, “The Male Bond”; Kutcher, “The Fifth Relationship”; Davis, “Fraternity and
Fratricide.”
33 See the articles by Huang, Gerritsen, Lam, and Besio in Nan Nü 9 (2007).
34 Louie, Theorising Chinese Masculinity; Song, The Fragile Scholar; Huang, Negotiat-
ing Masculinities.
35 Hershatter, The Gender of Memory; Wang, “Call me ‘Qingnian.’ ”
36 The term highlights the continuities in China’s social, economic, and (to a certain
extent) political systems through the Ming and Qing.
U
nineteenth century was raised, and elegantly answered, by Susan Mann in The Tal-
ented Women—see especially her summation of this issue in the epilogue, 195–200.
ve
rs
i ty
of
W
as
hi
ng
to
n
Pr
es
s
Introduction 17