Seager B Sped875 m4 Mentor Teacher Collaboration
Seager B Sped875 m4 Mentor Teacher Collaboration
Seager B Sped875 m4 Mentor Teacher Collaboration
University of Kansas
Brent Seager
February 4, 2018
MENTOR COLLABORATION 2
Earlier this week, my mentor teacher communicated with me to have three questions,
concerns, or comments ready for our meeting later in the week. This allowed me an opportunity
to reflect on lesson one, upcoming lesson two, and the self-determination meeting, which
comments ready for the meeting. According to Goodwin & et al., 2016, finding three focus
questions or areas in the teaching and learning process is essential element in successful teaching
and in the mentoring process as well. I began reflecting on the lessons and interactions that I
have had so far, and I was able to select three essential questions, concerns, or comments for our
meeting (Goodwin & et al., 2016). The conversation of our meeting was fluid and focused on
the three essential questions, comments, or concerns that my mentor had me review earlier in the
week. The collaboration meeting was well organized and structured around the three essential
elements that I was assigned to bring into the meeting with my mentor.
The first item that I discussed with my mentor was about designing instruction for lesson
three, based on the assessment data collected, in which my mentor and I agreed supported
strongly that 95% of the students are ready to move onto the next project of constructing their
persuasive writing project. The next item that I had was with the lesson plan for formal lesson
two, in which I reviewed it with my mentor and she agreed that it appears the students would
benefit from the social skill and instruction of how to use this skill. The last item that I had for
my mentor was discussing the increasing confidence level that I have observed by the student
that I have selected for the self-determination project. During our discussions, I felt confident
and that my mentor was very supportive in providing ideas and feedback for the three essential
items, which has really helped me as an educator. Based on the reading from Folz & et al., 2018,
face-to-face mentor meetings have resulted in high levels of satisfaction among mentees and
MENTOR COLLABORATION 3
mentors (Folz & et al., 2018). I agree with this statement, as the face-to-face collaboration
During this collaboration meeting with my mentor, I learned that I am on the right track
with my lesson plans and teaching. I have also found the value in having a mentor to help guide
me and provide timely feedback and ideas for improving my instruction and lesson delivery
within the classroom. According to Turkich & et al., 2014, mentoring has the potential to
increase teaching skills and pedagogical awareness within all learning environments (Turkich &
et al., 2014). I believe that the use of the three essential questions, comments, or concerns prior
to the meeting is a great way that my mentor uses to structure meetings and use this time more
efficiently. I am looking forward to future collaborations with my mentor using the same three
essential element format, as it has been a great resource for the collaboration meetings between
References
Folz, H.N., Sprunger, T.L., Sheehan, A.H., Aranda, J., Bozymski, K.M., Ramsey, D.C. &
Gonzalvo, J.D. (2018). Factors associated with mentor satisfaction among teaching and
p. 4-5
Goodwin, A.L., Roegman, R. & Reagan, E.M. (2016). Is experience the best teacher? Extensive
Turkich, K, Greive, S. & Cozens, P. (2014). “Riders on the storm”: A co-teaching mentor model
to increase student satisfaction and retention. A practice report. The International Journal