Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Seager B Sped875 m4 Mentor Teacher Collaboration

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Running Head: MENTOR COLLABORATION 1

Mentor Teacher Collaboration

SPED 875: Advanced Practicum with Exceptional Children and Youth

University of Kansas

Dr. Martha Elford

Brent Seager

February 4, 2018
MENTOR COLLABORATION 2

Module Four: Mentor Teacher Collaboration

Earlier this week, my mentor teacher communicated with me to have three questions,

concerns, or comments ready for our meeting later in the week. This allowed me an opportunity

to reflect on lesson one, upcoming lesson two, and the self-determination meeting, which

allowed me to meet my mentor teacher’s requirements of having three questions, concerns, or

comments ready for the meeting. According to Goodwin & et al., 2016, finding three focus

questions or areas in the teaching and learning process is essential element in successful teaching

and in the mentoring process as well. I began reflecting on the lessons and interactions that I

have had so far, and I was able to select three essential questions, concerns, or comments for our

meeting (Goodwin & et al., 2016). The conversation of our meeting was fluid and focused on

the three essential questions, comments, or concerns that my mentor had me review earlier in the

week. The collaboration meeting was well organized and structured around the three essential

elements that I was assigned to bring into the meeting with my mentor.

The first item that I discussed with my mentor was about designing instruction for lesson

three, based on the assessment data collected, in which my mentor and I agreed supported

strongly that 95% of the students are ready to move onto the next project of constructing their

persuasive writing project. The next item that I had was with the lesson plan for formal lesson

two, in which I reviewed it with my mentor and she agreed that it appears the students would

benefit from the social skill and instruction of how to use this skill. The last item that I had for

my mentor was discussing the increasing confidence level that I have observed by the student

that I have selected for the self-determination project. During our discussions, I felt confident

and that my mentor was very supportive in providing ideas and feedback for the three essential

items, which has really helped me as an educator. Based on the reading from Folz & et al., 2018,

face-to-face mentor meetings have resulted in high levels of satisfaction among mentees and
MENTOR COLLABORATION 3

mentors (Folz & et al., 2018). I agree with this statement, as the face-to-face collaboration

meetings with my mentor has allowed me to be very satisfied and encouraged.

During this collaboration meeting with my mentor, I learned that I am on the right track

with my lesson plans and teaching. I have also found the value in having a mentor to help guide

me and provide timely feedback and ideas for improving my instruction and lesson delivery

within the classroom. According to Turkich & et al., 2014, mentoring has the potential to

increase teaching skills and pedagogical awareness within all learning environments (Turkich &

et al., 2014). I believe that the use of the three essential questions, comments, or concerns prior

to the meeting is a great way that my mentor uses to structure meetings and use this time more

efficiently. I am looking forward to future collaborations with my mentor using the same three

essential element format, as it has been a great resource for the collaboration meetings between

my mentor and myself.


MENTOR COLLABORATION 4

References

Folz, H.N., Sprunger, T.L., Sheehan, A.H., Aranda, J., Bozymski, K.M., Ramsey, D.C. &

Gonzalvo, J.D. (2018). Factors associated with mentor satisfaction among teaching and

learning curriculum program participants. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching & Learning,

p. 4-5

Goodwin, A.L., Roegman, R. & Reagan, E.M. (2016). Is experience the best teacher? Extensive

clinical practice and mentor teachers’ perspectives of effective teaching. Urban

Education, 51(10), p. 1206-1207.

Turkich, K, Greive, S. & Cozens, P. (2014). “Riders on the storm”: A co-teaching mentor model

to increase student satisfaction and retention. A practice report. The International Journal

of the First Year in Higher Education, 5(1), p. 136-137.

You might also like