Complaint Against Kansas Attorney Dennis Depew of Kansas AGs Office
Complaint Against Kansas Attorney Dennis Depew of Kansas AGs Office
Complaint Against Kansas Attorney Dennis Depew of Kansas AGs Office
I am writing this complaint on Attorney Dennis Depew from the Kansas Attorney
General's Office at the address of 120 SW 10th Avenue, 2nd Floor in Topeka KS
66612.
Attorney Bernard Rhodes was indiscreetly talking to Attorney Dennis Depew and
Attorney Stephen Phillips about a female attorney who was previously at his law
firm of Lathrop and Gage who was disbarred and he stated he testified at her
disbarment hearing. Bernard Rhodes said she now works at a place where her
Attorney Dennis Depew and Attorney Stephen Phillips knew who the female
attorney was that Attorney Rhodes was talking about and knew that she had been
disbarred because Attorney Stephen Phillips said he had looked into her mortgage
case and she had not made a payment in 10 years because she had filed 3 frivolous
lawsuits and she needed to be disbarred! Bernard Rhodes shook his head again and
said "you know, when I had to deal with her she had times when she could be a real
pleasant human being to deal with and she wasn't so mean, sneaky, and nasty all the
time." All three attorneys started laughing with Mr. Rhodes shaking his head like
Attorney Stephen Phillips also said "it sounds to me like she has an alcohol problem
or perhaps she has alzheimer's because that's what that sounds like to me if she
gets more rude and nasty in her emails as the day goes on." All three attorney
started laughing again like it was a BIG JOKE that this lady lost her career as an
attorney. I'm highly offended that they compared this woman to that of having
Alzheimer's disease or even that she could be an alcoholic! I have dealt with
Alzheimer's in my family AND alcoholism and neither are anything to joke about.
After that conversation, Bernard Rhodes continued on and also asked Dennis
Depew if his son could vote in the New York election like he did last year even
though his son lives in Kansas City and has for the past six (6) years! Attorney
Dennis Depew asked if Rhodes' son was a student and Rhodes replied that he wasn't
a student and then after pausing, he said he can't vote in New York and Missouri
and then another pause and then Depew, Phillips, and Rhodes all started laughing. I
did not know a person could vote in the presidential election in more than one state!
I did not know a person could vote in two states period. I live in Kansas and work in
Missouri. Anytime there are issues that pertain to me, I am not aliowed to vote
because I do not live in Missouri. Why is Rhodes' son voting in two states and lives
in Missouri?
Attorney Bernard Rhodes states on page 12 lines 13-14 "they took that bite of the
apple, they lost at that bit of the apple". Attorney Dennis Depew thought that he
would join and participate in the name calling, bullying, and disrespect that Bernard
Rhodes was giving to Attorney Prince Ogunmeno and the Court by stating on the
Court transcript on page 19 lines 14-19 "He's just trying to do his job. And yet he
is constantly under attack, and this case is just yet another example of somebody
that now basically had three bites at the apple at the Federal Court level with the
initial ruling, the Motion to Clarify, and then the Motion to Alter or Amend".
talking about biting apples, but he actually refers to Attorney Ogunmeno as just
like they are all members of the BAR and Attorney Ogunmeno is just a somebody
off the streets that is not an attorney and does not have a name!! Attorney Dennis
Depew continues his unethical statements by saying on page 19 lines 20-21 "now
with the filing of this case, they want a fourth bite, and my client deserves to be
left alone". Kasey King DESERVES to have a fair and impartial hearing without
court transcript. Bernard Rhodes also insults Attorney Ogunmeno again on page 27
lines 21 to 2S and page 28 lines 1-2 of the court transcript when Attorney Rhodes
says "so he's mixing apples and oranges. I know we keep talking about bites at the
apples. I had two bites. somebody over here had four bites and now I'm talking
about oranges. But unfortunately. with the opposition we are dealing with. that is
the level we have to go to. is talking about fruit. because that's what we are dealing
The comment about dealing with fruit could also be considered a GAY RACIAL
people mentioning anything about mixing and eating fruit is Attorney Rhodes and
Attorney Depew. Do you suppose they were hungry? Or, do you suppose they think
Why is it that Rhodes and Depew are eating fruit in court anyway? Rhodes states
right on the record that "he had two bites at an apple and Depew had four bites at
an apple and then Rhodes was talking about oranges"!'! I can't believe that an
attorney is talking about fruit in a court case or even using it as an analogy if that
is what it was supposed to be!!! I see it and any normal individual would see it as
harassment.
Attorney Dennis Depew and Attorney Stephen Phillips also violated Kansas Rules of
Professional Conduct the Preamble and the following list shows the violations:
diligent. How was Mr. Rhodes, Depew, and Phillips competent when they are
not taking a criminal act seriously such as illegal voting and they are not
at apples?
A lawyer's conduct should conform to the requirements of the law, both in
affairs. A lawyer should use the law's procedures only for legitimate
A lawyer should demonstrate respect for the legal system and for those who
bites at apples and oranges instead of using what the rest of us refer to as the
proper words of "filing a lawsuit". Why did Rhodes use words to make fun of
Attorney Ogunmeno? Bernard Rhodes, Dennis Depew, and Stephen Phillips have
not upheld the legal process because they did not report to the BAR that Mr.
New York at the last presidential election when he has lived in the Kansas City,
I also feel that Dennis Depew and Stephen Phillips have violated the PREAMBLE: A
satisfactory living.
Stephen Phillips and Dennis Depew have no right to represent judges when they do
not have immunity and we complain to their office about the same judges in ouster
their PRIVATE CAPACITY.I feel Depew and Phillips have also violated KRPC Rule
reporting each other for not reporting Bernard Rhodes for misconduct when his
I also don't think it is the Attorney General's duty to go snoop in mortgage cases of
private people instead of doing their duties laid out in their own job description
legal work to other law firms because the Attorney Generals aren't doing the job
duties of their office and instead bill the state tax payers. I doubt too many tax
payers would agree to this seeings how many tax payers have to go out and hire
their own private attorneys rather than have the Attorney General's office do it
for them for free ...ESPECIALLYwhen they did the damage in their own private
capacity.
It shows how GUlLTY both Stephen Phillips and Dennis Depew were in SMALL
CLAIMS COURT, case number lSSC70P Noah Day vs. My Town Media when they
entity, a RUN-OF-THE-MILL
RADIOSTATIONHWhy is Bernie Rhodes in this
particular case anyway? Since Depew and Phillips already represented My Town
Media radio station in a SMALL CLAIMS court case, why aren't they representing
them now? I know why, it is because they were WRONG to do so. AND ...BECAUSE
61-2707(a) to represent My Town Media in small claims court, but they did it
anyway, which is extremely unethical and extremely incompetent. And they want
office has violated Supreme Court Rule 162 CONFLICTS IN TRIAL SETTINGS IN
DISTRICT COURT since Stephen Phillips should have been disqualified since he
needed to be a witness in this case under Rule 226 Kansas Rules of Professional
Conduct. KRPC Rule 1.7(b) Conflict ofInterest General Rule, KRPC Rule 1.10(a)
Imputed Disqualification, and KRPC Rule 3.7(a) Lawyer as Witness and states as
follows:
Phillips was listed as the last modifier in the attached evidence of computer
which shows that the email sent by Defendant Lori Fleming to Bill Wachter
of My Town Media on February 19, 2015 was "MODIFIED" and that her
attorney "STEPHEN PHILLIPS" is in the mega data code which shows that
the original email that Lori Fleming sent was "MODIFIED". Stephen Phillips
is listed as the "LAST MODIFIER" which means the original email according
to the computer expert has been altered and the evidence of the email has
that is material to the determination of the issues being litigated in this case. The
evidence of what Attorney Phillips altered in the email that Defendant Lori Fleming
than the testimony of Attorney Phillips and the ability to view his computer at
DISCOVERY.Do you see why they are being so ugly to Attorney Ogunmeno? They
can't let Attorney Ogunmeno get to Discovery or the fraud that was committed by
Attorney Phillips by altering the email will come out. The testimony of Attorney
Kansas Court of Appeals and the following case law, Attorney Phillips should be
The Kansas Court of Appeals has adopted the following factors that must be
opposing party asserting the attorney is a material witness: "(1) Whether it had
been shown that the attorney will give evidence material to the determination of
the issues being litigated; (2) whether the evidence could not be obtained
elsewhere: and, (3) whether the testimony would have been prejudicial or
Cottonwood Estates v. Paradise Builders, 128 Ariz 99, 105,624 P2d 296,302
witness other than on behalf of his client, a motion for disqualification must be
supported by a showing that the attorney will give evidence material to the
attorney's client. 'See also J.P. Foley & Co. v. Vanderbilt, 523 F2d 1357 (CA2 1975);
Freeman v. Kulicke & Soffa Industries, 449 FSupp. 974 (EDPa 1978); Connell v.
Clairol, 440 FSupp 17, 18 n. 1 (NDGa 1977); Miller Electrical Construction v. Devine
Lighting Co., 421 FSupp 1020 (WDPa 1976); Brown v. DeRugeris, 92 CalApp3d 895,
Attorney Stephen Phillips and Attorney Dennis Depew have also violated Supreme
Town Media in 15SC70P in Small Claims Court but they are not representing My
Town Media in this case and it is Attorney Rhodes who is their counsel. According
to Supreme Court Rule 117 Dennis Depew and Stephen Phillips needed to file a
WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY since they both spoke for My Town Media and
Sincerely,
Brl~Nw~
Eric Muathe,
P. O. Box 224,
Pittsburg, Kansas, 66762
1
2 KASEY KING, )
)
3 )
Plaintiff, )
4 )
vs. ) CASE NO.
5 ) 2017CV72-P
MY TOWN MEDIA, INC., et al,)
6 )
)
7 )
DefendantB. )
8
10 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
11
16
17 APPEARANCES:
1 APPEARANCES: (Continued)
2 teleconference.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1 PROCEEDINGS
7 do this.
14 very unclear.
17 sir.
19 A-D-E-B-A-Y-O O-G-U-N-M-E-N-O.
2 For defense?
5 Loy.
8 Judge Fleming.
10 that's my fault.
16 that motion?
2 25.
5 that.
6 counsel.
10 there?
7 November 1st
17 November 9th.
18
8 that?
13 the 19th.
16 court.
18 calendar.
22 did this by --
14 plaintiff there?
1 back.
4 respond.
11 breaking up.
17 16 at one-thirty?
19 should be ready.
23 then?
3 Crawford County.)
11 got to do.
19 hearing date.
2 Honor.
1 CERTIFICATE
STATE OF KANSAS.
SS.
3 ALLEN COUNTY.
23