Answer ALL of The Following Questions (2 Points Each) .: Solution: Taylor Equation For Tool Life
Answer ALL of The Following Questions (2 Points Each) .: Solution: Taylor Equation For Tool Life
Answer ALL of The Following Questions (2 Points Each) .: Solution: Taylor Equation For Tool Life
IE-352
Section 1, CRN: 5022
Section 2, CRN: 32997
Second Semester 1432-33 H (Spring-2012) – 4(4,1,1)
MANUFACTURING PROCESSES - 2
Sunday, Apr 29, 2012 (08/06/1433H)
Homework 3 Answers
𝑛 = 0.5; 𝐶 = 90
⇒ 𝑉𝑇 0.5 = 90 ⇒ 𝑉1 𝑇1 0.5 = 𝑉2 𝑇2 0.5
a) 𝑇2 = 𝑇1 + 200%𝑇1 = 3𝑇1
⇒ 𝑉1 𝑇1 0.5 = 𝑉2 (3𝑇1 )0.5
⇒ 𝑉1 = √3𝑉2
⇒
𝑉2 1
= = 0.577
𝑉1 √3
Note, less than half speed reduction is required for tool life to triple
a) 𝑇3 = 𝑇1 + 1000%𝑇1 = 11𝑇1
⇒ 𝑉1 𝑇1 0.5 = 𝑉3 (11𝑇1 )0.5
⇒ 𝑉1 = √11𝑉3
⇒
𝑉3 1
= = 0.302
𝑉1 √11
El-Sherbeeny, PhD Apr 29, 2012 IE 352 (01,02) - Spring 2012 HW 3 Answers Page - 1
King Saud University – College of Engineering – Industrial Engineering Dept.
a) =?
b) =?
c) 𝑅𝑀𝑅 =?
Solution:
⇒ = 𝟑𝟑. 𝟓°
b) can be obtained from:
= cot + tan( − )
⇒ = cot 33.5° + tan(33.5° − 8°)
⇒ = 𝟏. 𝟗𝟖𝟕
c) 𝑅𝑀𝑅 (material removal rate) is the volume of material removed (i.e.
cut) every second which can be obtained from:
𝑅𝑀𝑅 = 𝑤𝑡𝑜 𝑉 = (2.6 𝑚𝑚)(0.30 𝑚𝑚)[(1.8 𝑚⁄𝑠)(1000 𝑚𝑚⁄𝑚)]
𝒎𝒎𝟑
⇒𝑹𝑴𝑹 = 𝟏𝟒𝟎𝟒
𝒔
El-Sherbeeny, PhD Apr 29, 2012 IE 352 (01,02) - Spring 2012 HW 3 Answers Page - 2
King Saud University – College of Engineering – Industrial Engineering Dept.
3. Assume that, in orthogonal cutting, the rake angle is 25° and the
coefficient of friction is 0.2. Use the cutting ratio equation to determine
the percentage increase in chip thickness when the friction is
doubled.
Given:
Solution:
Assuming rake angle () and depth of cut (𝑡𝑜 ) are kept constant⇒
cos(2 − )
𝑡𝑜
𝑡𝑐2 sin 2 cos(2 − ) sin 1
= =
𝑡𝑐1 cos(1 − ) cos(1 − ) sin 2
𝑡𝑜
sin 1
We lack the values for the shear angles(1 and 2 ), so we use:
𝛽
= 45° + −
2 2
Note how we use this equation since µ1 and µ2 < 0.5
Also, note:
𝛽1 = tan−1 µ1 = tan−1 0.2 = 11.31°
𝛽2 = tan−1 µ2 = tan−1 0.4 = 21.80°
⇒
𝛽1 25° 11.31°
1 = 45° + −
= 45° + − = 51.85°
2 2 2 2
𝛽2 25° 21.80°
2 = 45° + − = 45° + − = 46.60°
2 2 2 2
El-Sherbeeny, PhD Apr 29, 2012 IE 352 (01,02) - Spring 2012 HW 3 Answers Page - 3
King Saud University – College of Engineering – Industrial Engineering Dept.
⇒
𝑡 𝑐2
increase in chip thickness= − 1 = 1.13 − 1 = 𝟏𝟑%
𝑡 𝑐1
El-Sherbeeny, PhD Apr 29, 2012 IE 352 (01,02) - Spring 2012 HW 3 Answers Page - 4
King Saud University – College of Engineering – Industrial Engineering Dept.
El-Sherbeeny, PhD Apr 29, 2012 IE 352 (01,02) - Spring 2012 HW 3 Answers Page - 5
King Saud University – College of Engineering – Industrial Engineering Dept.
first operation:
o cutting temperature: 𝑇1 = 650 °𝐶
𝑚
o cutting speed: 𝑉1 = 90
𝑚𝑖𝑛
𝑚𝑚
o feed: 𝑓 = 0.05
𝑟𝑒𝑣
Required:
a) second operation:
o 𝑉2 = 2𝑉1
o 𝑇2 =?
b) third operation:
o 𝑇3 = 480 °𝐶
o 𝑉3 =?
Solution:
0.000665𝑌𝑓 3 𝑉𝑡0
𝑇= √
𝜌𝑐 𝐾
𝑇 0.000665𝑌𝑓 3 𝑡0
3 = √ =𝐶
√𝑉 𝜌𝑐 𝐾
Thus,
𝑇1 𝑇2
3
= 3
√𝑉1 √𝑉2
El-Sherbeeny, PhD Apr 29, 2012 IE 352 (01,02) - Spring 2012 HW 3 Answers Page - 6
King Saud University – College of Engineering – Industrial Engineering Dept.
a) second operation:
3
√𝑉2 3 2𝑉
1 3
𝑇2 = 𝑇1 = √ 𝑇1 = √2𝑇1 = (1.26)(650 °𝐶)
3
𝑉
√ 1 𝑉1
⇒𝑻𝟐 = 𝟖𝟏𝟗 °𝑪
b) third operation:
3 𝑇3 3 480 °𝐶 3
√𝑉3 = √𝑉1 = √90 = 3.309
𝑇1 650 °𝐶
⇒ 𝑉3 = 3.3093
𝒎
⇒ 𝑽𝟑 = 𝟑𝟔. 𝟐
𝒎𝒊𝒏
Alternative Solution:
𝑇𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛 𝑉 𝑎 𝑓 𝑏
or: 𝑇𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛 = 𝐶 𝑉 𝑎 𝑓 𝑏
⇒𝑇𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛 = 𝐶 𝑉 𝑎 𝑓 𝑏
𝑇𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛 1 𝑇𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛 2
=
𝑉10.2 𝑉20.2
a) second operation:
𝑉20.2 2𝑉1 0.2
𝑇𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛 2 = 0.2 𝑇𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛1 = ( ) 𝑇𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛1 = (20.2 )(𝑇𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛 1 )
𝑉1 𝑉1
= (1.15)(650 °𝐶)
⇒𝑻𝟐 = 𝟕𝟒𝟕 °𝑪
b) third operation:
𝑇3 480 °𝐶 0.2
𝑉30.2 = 𝑉10.2 = 90 = 1.816
𝑇1 650 °𝐶
El-Sherbeeny, PhD Apr 29, 2012 IE 352 (01,02) - Spring 2012 HW 3 Answers Page - 7
King Saud University – College of Engineering – Industrial Engineering Dept.
1
⇒ 𝑉3 = 1.8160.2 = 1.8165
𝒎
⇒ 𝑽𝟑 = 𝟏𝟗. 𝟖
𝒎𝒊𝒏
Note that the second solution did not produce a significantly large
difference in final temperature, and yet a large difference in cutting
speeds.
El-Sherbeeny, PhD Apr 29, 2012 IE 352 (01,02) - Spring 2012 HW 3 Answers Page - 8