PRS Methodology: About "PRS" and The Coplin-O'Leary System™
PRS Methodology: About "PRS" and The Coplin-O'Leary System™
PRS Methodology: About "PRS" and The Coplin-O'Leary System™
Political Risk Services is the most widely accepted system of completely independent political risk
forecasting. All publications based on this system are included in the Political Risk Services
product line. Political Risk Services methodology and research produce 100 Country Reports and
various service packages and related publications, including our premier service, PRS Online, and
the academic version of our premier service, Political Risk Yearbook.
After calculating consolidated scores for all regimes (100% of possibilities), the PRS system
converts these numbers into letter grades (on a scale from A+ to D-) for three investment areas:
financial transfers (banking and lending), foreign direct investment (e.g. retail, manufacturing,
mining), and exports to the host country market. PRS unique system provides only industry
specific forecasts, not a generic macro level assessment, as is usually the case.
Users can customize the PRS forecasting model to individual projects or the particular exposures of
a firm with an optional weighting system, adding or subtracting variables and adjusting the model to
fit specific firm or project attributes.
PRS Country Reports forecast the risk of doing business in 100 countries. PRS updates these 100
reports as political events dictate in each country. Each includes comments and analysis on recent
events, profiles of key political players, and wide-ranging forecast scenarios, as well as basic
historical and political background and data on the government, political entities, the environment,
and the economy, including key sectors.
Reproduction without written permission of The PRS Group, Inc. is strictly prohibited
1
The PRS Group, Inc., applies the Coplin-OLeary Rating System every day as the editorial staff
for our Political Risk Services product line produces 100 Country Reports. In addition to defining
the Coplin-OLeary Rating System and related terminology we use in producing the Country
Reports, this explanation also describes a set of calculations that you can use to create risk ratings.
In the 18-month and five-year forecasts of our Country Reports, the risk ratings indicate the
placement of countries from least risky (A+) to most risky (D-) for financial transfer, direct
investment, and export markets. The system is designed in such a way that it can be adjusted to suit
the needs of a particular project or combination of corporate interests.
The Coplin-OLeary System is a general risk model. Figure A.1 (under Steps in Calculating),
our Standard Worksheet for Coplin-OLeary Model, will help you understand how risk
assessments are translated into numbers and how the numbers are used to calculate risk ratings in
our Country Reports. Figure A.2 (Adjusting the Ratings for Your Own Use) then gives you a
Customized Worksheet To Design Your Own Model-based on the Coplin-OLeary System.
Turmoil. Actions that can result in threats or harm to people or property by political groups or
foreign governments, operating within the country or from an external base:
Riots and demonstrations
Politically motivated strikes
Disputes with other countries that may affect business
Terrorism and guerrilla activities
Civil or international war
Street crime that might affect international business personnel
Organized crime having an impact on political stability or foreign business
Not included in turmoil are legal, work-related labor strikes that do not lead to violence.
Reproduction without written permission of The PRS Group, Inc. is strictly prohibited
2
Taxation Discrimination. The formal and informal tax policies that either lead to bias against, or
special advantages favoring international business.
Repatriation Restrictions. Formal and informal rules regarding the reparation of profits, dividends,
and investment capital.
Exchange Controls. Formal policies, informal practices, and financial conditions that either ease or
inhibit converting local currency to foreign currency, normally a firms home currency.
Tariff Barriers. The average and range of financial costs imposed on imports.
Other Import Barriers. Formal and informal quotas, licensing provisions, or other restrictions on
imports.
Payment Delays. The punctuality, or otherwise, with which government and private importers pay
their foreign creditors, based on government policies, domestic economic conditions, and
international financial conditions.
Fiscal and Monetary Expansion. An assessment of the effect of the governments spending,
taxing, interest rate and other monetary policies. The assessment is based on a judgment as to
whether the expansion is inadequate for a healthy business climate, acceptably expansionist, or so
excessively expansionist as to threaten inflation or other economic disorder.
Labor Policies. Government policies, trade union activity, and productivity of the labor force that
create either high or low costs for businesses.
Foreign Debt. The magnitude of all foreign debt relative to the size of the economy and the ability
of the countrys public and private institutions to repay debt service obligations promptly.
Investment Restrictions. The current base and likely changes in the general climate for restricting
foreign investments.
Trade Restrictions. The current base and the likely changes in the general climate for restricting
the entry of foreign trade.
Domestic Economic Problems. A countrys ranking according to its most recent five-year
performance record in per capita GDP, GDP growth, inflation, unemployment, capital investment,
and budget balance.
Reproduction without written permission of The PRS Group, Inc. is strictly prohibited
3
International Economic Problems. A countrys ranking according to its most recent five-year
performance record in current account (as a percentage of GDP), the ratio of debt service to exports,
and the annual percentage change in the value of the currency.
We use these 17 factors in our summary risk ratings, first estimating the current risk level of each
factor and then forecasting the change in its risk level under each of the three most likely regime
scenarios. The numerical equivalents of these current and forecast levels are then used to calculate
the risk scores.
A Note about Regime Names: The label assigned to a regime indicates the most powerful
component of the government. This can be an individual leader and a political party, the dominant
orientation within the leadership, or groups such as the military or a civilian-military alliance. The
probabilities assigned to the most likely regimes are derived from the opinions of our country risk
specialists.
Low Risk. For countries with this rating, most discontent is expressed peacefully, and the extremely
rare occurrences of violence from political causes almost never affect international business directly
or indirectly.
Moderate Risk. These are countries in which international business can sometimes be affected by
occasional riots, acts of terrorism, and significant levels of labor unrest or other kinds of discontent.
Reproduction without written permission of The PRS Group, Inc. is strictly prohibited
4
High Risk. High-risk countries experience levels of violence or potential violence that could
seriously affect international business.
Very High Risk. The turmoil level in such countries creates conditions that approach a state of war.
A Countries. No exchange controls, or other barriers to financial transfer, and little likelihood
that controls will increase in the forecast period.
B Countries. Modest or sporadic delays in financial transfers; a reasonable chance that delays
will be high in the forecast period.
C Countries. Modest to heavy delays and even blockage of financial transfers; a reasonable
chance for barriers to increase, and little chance to decrease, within the forecast period.
D Countries. Heavy exchange controls and long delays for the transfer of currency; little chance
that conditions will improve within the forecast period.
Reproduction without written permission of The PRS Group, Inc. is strictly prohibited
5
parentheses when a forecast changes. Countries are rated for direct investment risk according to a
scale ranging from A+ for the least risky to D- for the most risky. The 18-month letter grades are
determined by seven equally weighted factors, each combining the current level and the forecasts of
change under the three most likely regimes. These are the factors:
1. Turmoil
2. Equity Restrictions
3. Restrictions on Local Operations (labor, management, and procurement)
4. Taxation Discrimination
5. Repatriation Restrictions
6. Exchange Controls
7. Labor Costs
A Countries. Few restrictions on equity ownership in most industries; few controls on local
operations, the repatriation of funds, or foreign exchange; taxation policy that does not discriminate
between foreign and domestic business. Little likelihood that restrictions will increase, and little
threat from political turmoil.
B Countries. Some threat on equity ownership, frequently in the form of a requirement for
partial ownership by nationals; restrictions on local operations, particularly regarding local
procurement; few restrictions on repatriation, but some exchange controls possible; some threat to
business from political turmoil; and a possibility that restrictions and turmoil may increase.
Reproduction without written permission of The PRS Group, Inc. is strictly prohibited
6
Export Market Risk Ratings
The term export refers to the risks facing exporters to the country, especially risks related to
market conditions, barriers to imports, and delays or difficulties in receiving payment for goods.
Risk ratings, expressed as letter grades, indicate the climate for foreign exporters for both the 18-
month and five-year forecast periods. A previous rating appears in parentheses when a forecast
changes. As potential export markets, countries are rated for risk according to a scale ranging from
A+ for the least risky to D- for the most risky. The 18-month letter grades are determined by six
equally weighted factors, each combining the current level and the forecasts of change under the
three most likely regimes.
These are the factors:
1. Turmoil
2. Exchange Controls
3. Tariffs
4. Other Trade Barriers
5. Payment Delays
6. Foreign Debt
A Countries. Stable politically and economically; low trade barriers and adequate foreign
reserves to allow for prompt payment; little chance that conditions will deteriorate.
B Countries. Some protectionist sentiment and a poor foreign exchange position may lead to
moderate tariff and non-tariff trade barriers; modest delays in payment result from poor economic
conditions; some chance that the business climate will deteriorate.
C Countries. Strong protectionist sentiment and weak foreign exchange position, producing high
tariff and other barriers to trade; the risk of prolonged payment delays or non-payment, requiring
conservative credit policies; little chance that conditions will improve and a strong chance that they
will deteriorate.
D Countries. High tariff and non-tariff barriers resulting from a combination of protectionist
sentiment and a lack of foreign currency; prolonged payment delays or non-payment likely; little
chance that conditions will improve and a strong chance that they will deteriorate further.
Reproduction without written permission of The PRS Group, Inc. is strictly prohibited
7
Steps in Calculating
All data in our worksheets come directly from the assessments and forecasts of country specialists
(the Forecast Summary of any report). Calculations on the worksheet generate a score for each of
17 variables (12 for the 18-month forecast period and five for the five-year period). Different
combinations of variables make up the three risk ratings.
For the 18-month forecast, TRANSFER uses variables 6, 9, 10, and 12; INVESTMENT uses
variables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11; and EXPORT uses 1, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 12.
For the five-year forecast, TRANSFER uses variables 13 and 17; INVESTMENT uses variables 13,
14, and 16; EXPORT uses variables 13, 15, 16, and 17. In addition, the corresponding 18-month
score is a component of each five-year risk score.
Reproduction without written permission of The PRS Group, Inc. is strictly prohibited
8
Step One: Current & Base Level of Restrictions
First, the number for the first blank next to variables 1-12 (column headed C.L.) is obtained from
the CURRENT & BASE listings for Turmoil, Invest, and Trade on the Forecast Summary.
Current & Base risk or restriction levels are scaled as follows:
Reproduction without written permission of The PRS Group, Inc. is strictly prohibited
9
Then each number representing a forecast is multiplied by the probability for the corresponding
regime (at the head of the appropriate column in the Forecast Summary).
Reproduction without written permission of The PRS Group, Inc. is strictly prohibited
10
Figure A.2: Customized Worksheet To Design Your Own Model
________ _______
SUMS: WEIGHTS WEIGHTED
SCORES
F = FORECAST
P = PROBABILITY
Using both our factors and your own, complete the worksheet as indicated, assigning whatever
relative weights are most appropriate for your firm or industrial sector.
You may want to assign weights in terms of the importance of particular variables in relation to the
project or country you are analyzing. Use the Customized Worksheet (shown in Figure A.2) to
combine our variables with others relevant to your companys needs and to incorporate needed
changes in the weight of certain factors, thus creating a project-specific risk analysis. The
customized worksheet uses the same scaling procedures used in the Standard Worksheet (Figure
A.1). Calculate the weighted average according to the instructions on the customized worksheet.
You can use the numbers generated for greater precision or use the same rules as in the Coplin-
OLeary System to convert the numerical scores to letter ratings.
Reproduction without written permission of The PRS Group, Inc. is strictly prohibited
11
Creating a General Risk Summary from Specific Risk Forecasts
The resulting numerical scores can be used in a variety of ways. For example, PRS uses the
numerical risk scores to calculate unified risk scores, producing the PRS Risk Index, providing a
basic, convenient way for users to compare countries directly.
The 17 risk values can also be used selectively to calculate 18-month and five-year risk scores for
different categories of risk values. In each Country Report we report summary ratings for four
categories of risk: turmoil, financial transfer, direct investment, and export market. You can use the
numerical scores, rather than letters, as the ratings, as part of a monitoring procedure, keeping in
mind that the numbers are ultimately based on judgmental estimates. Just as PRS uses the numerical
risk scores to calculate unified risk scores for the PRS Risk Index, you can create an index from
the PRS ratings modified in a way that most appropriately allows your organization to compare and
monitor countries and/or regions. The Coplin-OLeary ratings for 100 countries are available at
CountryData (in spreadsheet format, including both the alphabetical scores and their numerical
equivalents.)
Reproduction without written permission of The PRS Group, Inc. is strictly prohibited
12
Each factors contribution to the index is based on its risk value, computed as described in Steps in
Calculating. Each of the 17 factors has a theoretical range of zero (in case of a Low current
level and a forecast of no change under any of the three regimes) to +4.0 (in case of a very high
current level and a forecast of more restrictive policies).
The 17 risk values are summed, and the resulting total is scaled so that a raw score of 0
(representing low risk) is reported as 100 and a score of 68 (representing very high risk) is reported
as 0. The index, therefore, ranges from zero, for countries with the most unfavorable climate for
international business, to 100, for countries with the most favorable climate. A raw score is
converted to an PRS Risk Index number by the formula
((RS-68)/(-68))*100
Equal Weighting. First, we assume that each factor included in the three basic risk ratings
(financial transfer, direct investment, and export markets) is relevant to the rating, and all are
weighted equally. Obviously, for some business investments, other risk factors may be important;
furthermore, in some analyses certain factors should be weighted more heavily than others. In such
cases, you can adjust the aggregating procedure as you wish by adding or deleting factors or by
weighting some more than others.
The Elements of Change. Second, we assume that risks are a combination of current government
policy and any changes that each regime may produce. The changes are scaled so that if there is no
change, the risk factor has the same value as the current level. A regime that will add conditions or
restrictions increases the current or base level, and one that will lessen them reduces the magnitude.
The Probability Factor. Third, the amount added or reduced by each of the three most likely
regimes is weighted by the likelihood (probability) that that regime would come to power before
being added to the current level of risk or restrictions.
Reproduction without written permission of The PRS Group, Inc. is strictly prohibited
13
Our forecasts are based on the following considerations:
World and regional economic trends
How those trends affect the country
Local conditions affecting the economy of the country
Turmoil and social conditions under the three most likely regimes
Business and economic policies expected under each of the three most likely regimes
How and Where to Use Political Risk Forecasts
Individuals holding nearly any position of responsibility in an internationally oriented firm can use
political risk forecasts. Typical users include the president, vice president, manager, director,
planner, finance officer, international officer, security officer, economist, researcher, market
analyst, and librarian. This variety is evidence of the importance of political risk information. The
many uses also present companies with a challenge to determine how to maximize political risk
information throughout the organization, especially in the major areas of need. A discussion of how
to apply our risk ratings follows, and a summary of applications appears in Table 1.
Table A.3. Most Frequent Uses of Country and Political Risk Forecasts
Type of Use Percent Using
General background 51%
Evaluating risks to specific projects or investments 36%
Briefing upper-level management 32%
Supplement to other outside sources 30%
Briefing before overseas trips 28%
Strategic planning 27%
Supplement to information from foreign subsidiaries 25%
Briefing colleagues 21%
Making decisions about security 19%
Determining new business opportunities 18%
Identification of key people and institutions 16%
Tempering upper managements inside information 16%
Sales or marketing decisions 15%
Supplement to headquarters research and analysis 15%
Preparing for negotiations 10%
Giving perspective to news stories 9%
Planning and evaluating insurance coverage 9%
Assistance in public information activities 5%
Briefing employees going overseas 4%
Reproduction without written permission of The PRS Group, Inc. is strictly prohibited
14
PRS Can Help Your Company Design a Risk Forecasting System
How do you identify the risks of investing in emerging markets?
Does political or country risk affect your industry?
What political forces may affect your business decisions?
How do you anticipate and measure political and country risks?
Your company may be investing millions in technology, including internal risk models. But the
political risk layer of these models may pose the most significant challenge. PRS can help by
sending one of our experts to sit down one-on-one with your experts.
PRS is well qualified to help. We have been analyzing political and country risk since 1979. Our
founders, William D. Coplin and Michael K. OLeary, developed this field of analysis and have
trained countless experts. Now our experts can help your company massage political and country
risk data to fit your companys customized risk model. Or if you dont have a risk model yet, we
can help you develop one.
Not only is this compilation of economic data comprehensive and extensive, it is also more up-to-
date than any other source of which we are aware, printed or online. In addition to gathering data
from official sources, we routinely make updated estimates of the current years figures for each
variable, and we equate and report every countrys data in the same currency, the US dollar, for
ease of cross-country comparisons.
Of course, estimates during a particular year need to be adjusted as a more complete picture
evolves. We completely revise and update both the data and forecasts for each country on a
quarterly basis. Our policy of keeping our data as timely as possible does mean that many of the
figures we report, especially the most recent, require updating over time. We believe that the
inevitability of revision and updating is no reason to delay the reporting of the best estimates as they
become available.
For the economic data contained in each countrys Databank, our primary source is International
Financial Statistics (IFS). This monthly publication of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is
the most reliable, comprehensive, and timely source available for making comparisons between
countries. Other sources (listed in the Bibliography below), as well as news sources, regional and
technical journals, and electronic news services help us track day-to-day events that may necessitate
Reproduction without written permission of The PRS Group, Inc. is strictly prohibited
15
changes in both our Databanks and our Fact Sheets. Our research and editorial staff also rely on
publications of individual governments, the World Bank, regional international banks, agencies of
the US and other governments, and embassies. We also maintain direct personal contact with
officials and researchers in these organizations in order to obtain information and estimates quickly
and reliably.
Our only goal is to publish unbiased forecasts and timely, accurate data
Our forecasts avoid the inevitable biases found in other sources of risk analysis. Financial
institutions tend to be excessively optimistic in their forecasts, especially regarding those countries
in which they themselves hold a substantial stake. Governments generally make projections about a
countryeither optimistic or pessimisticdepending on the state of diplomatic relations with the
country. They rarely provide forecasts inconsistent with their own objectives. By contrast,
insurance companies, who are concerned with loss and risk, are inclined toward chronic pessimism.
Newspapers tend to cover stories that relate to the latest events, following a country closely when it
is newsworthy, and otherwise ignoring it. They also will emphasize those countries in which their
reporters are located or where they happen to be visiting. Internal corporate sources are perhaps the
most suspect of all. They are overwhelmingly motivated to shape their views around the interests of
top corporate officials. The staffs of foreign divisions of corporations are notorious for their
tendency to become apologists for their own country, usually reporting back to headquarters based
on information provided by the officials of the host government and others protecting the status
quo.
In short, all these other sources provide reports and analyses shaped by their interests and particular
points of view. By contrast, our own self-interest is simple: to provide the most accurate, timely,
and objective information, analysis, and forecasting possible. We neither advocate nor discourage
investments in any country. We simply try to provide a comprehensive and useful Country Report
possible for each country we monitor.
Our website www.prsgroup.com provides a free sample Country Report for you to view online or
download for further consideration.
Bibliography
Chiefs of State and Cabinet Members of Foreign Governments. Springfield, VA: National Technical
Information Service. Monthly.
OECD Economic Outlook. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Semiannual.
Reproduction without written permission of The PRS Group, Inc. is strictly prohibited
16
OECD Economic Surveys. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Periodical.
World Almanac and Book of Facts. New York: Newspaper Enterprise Association. Annual.
World Population Data Sheet. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau. Annual.
Reproduction without written permission of The PRS Group, Inc. is strictly prohibited
17