Mobile Offshore Base - Wikipedia
Mobile Offshore Base - Wikipedia
Mobile Offshore Base - Wikipedia
org/wiki/Mobile_offshore_base
1 Concept
2 History
3 Criticism
4 See also
5 References
6 Further reading
7 External links
In theory, the modularity of a MOB allows the full spectrum of air support, ranging from vertical/short takeoff
and landing (VSTOL) aircraft using a single platform to conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL) aircraft
utilizing several serially aligned modules approaching 2 km (6,000 feet) in length. The cluster could have an air
strip that could hold a large aircraft such as C-130 or C-17. In addition, a MOB accepts ship-borne cargo,
provides nominally 280,000 m (3 million square feet) for equipment storage and maintenance, stores 40 million
litres (10 million gallons) of fuel, houses up to 3,000 troops (an Army heavy brigade), and discharges resources
to the shore via a variety of landing craft. It was argued, that once positioned, the MOB would operate as a sea
base for an extended period, so it would need to have port-like facilities for unloading and loading conventional
container and Roll-on/Roll-off ships.[2]
1 of 3 9/22/2017 9:24 PM
Mobile offshore base - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_offshore_base
The idea of the MOB was first seriously considered when the United States entered Operation Desert Shield
(199091). The U.S. was forced to request the use of allied bases, which, besides strictly military considerations,
proved to be politically sensitive in the case of Saudi Arabia. With the MOB concept the U.S. could have a base
anywhere in the world in as little as a month. The base as conceived would have had virtually unlimited
capabilities, and most of its creators did not envision just a floating air strip, but a town-sized base.[3]
The Joint Mobile Offshore Base (JMOB) was a MOB concept for expeditionary warfare and humanitarian and
commercial operations developed in the 1990s by McDermott International, Inc. of Arlington, Virginia. The
JMOB was to be composed of five self-propelled units creating a one-mile long runway that could accommodate
a fully loaded C-17. NATO was thought to be interested in the concept at the time.[4]
A technical report presented to the U.S. Congress in April 2000 identified that such a base was technologically
feasible and could be built by the defense industry of the United States.
In December 1999, the Office of Naval Research (ONR) in response to a congressional mandate issued a report
which delineated the impracticality of MOBs, "the largest floating offshore structure ever conceived by
maritime engineers",[5] on the grounds of high cost and vulnerability to threats such as missile attack. In January
2001, the Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA) stated that MOB "would not be capable of effectively replacing
conventional sealift"[5] because it provides an inferior delivery capability to the existing Joint Logistics Over the
Shore (JLOTS) system. The report concluded that the estimated US$5 billion to US$8 billion MOB project was
less cost effective than existing at the time other solutions.[6][7]
Military logistics
Military power projection
Seabasing
Unsinkable aircraft carrier
Very large floating structure
Floating airport
Supercarrier
Project Habakkuk
2 of 3 9/22/2017 9:24 PM
Mobile offshore base - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_offshore_base
MOB (https://books.google.com/books?id=ALmNS29bgEUC&pg=PA168&lpg=PA168&dq=http:
//mob.nfesc.navy.mil/&source=bl&ots=9q_qCXST0H&sig=Zs5yYIU8ZhKGMlp1skn4LRoM2PQ&
hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi-uIa6gefLAhVD5iYKHdWIBlEQ6AEIHjAA#v=onepage&q&f=false) in
Mansour, A E, and Rifat C. Ertekin. Proceedings of the 15th International Ship and Offshore Structures
Congress. Oxford: Elsevier, 2003, p. 167-169.
Greer, W. L. Mobile Offshore Base Operational Utility and Cost Study (No. IDA-P-3573).
(http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA387250) Alexandria,
Va.: Institute for Defence Analysis, January 2001.
3 of 3 9/22/2017 9:24 PM