Foundation Selection PDF
Foundation Selection PDF
Foundation Selection PDF
Foundation Selection
This chapter provides foundation designs, along with the use
of the drawings in Appendix A, to assist the homebuilder, contractor,
and local engineering professional in developing a safe and
strong foundation. Foundation design types, foundation design
considerations, cost estimating, and details on how to use this
manual are presented.
coastal zone, wind speed, and elevation requirements, all of which have been discussed in the
previous chapters. The following types of foundation designs are presented in this manual:
Open/Deep Foundations
n Braced timber pile (Case A)
n Steel pipe pile with concrete column and grade beam (Case B)
n Timber pile with concrete column and grade beam (Case C)
n Timber pile with concrete grade and elevated beams and concrete columns (Case H)
Open/Shallow Foundations
n Concrete column and grade beam (Case D)
n Concrete column and grade beam with slab (Case G)
Closed/Shallow Foundations
n Reinforced masonry crawlspace (Case E)
n Reinforced masonry stem wall (Case F)
Each of these foundation types designed for coastal areas have advantages and disadvantages
that must be taken into account. Modifications to the details and drawings might be needed to
incorporate specific home footprints, elevation heights, and wind speeds to a given foundation
type. Consultation with a licensed professional engineer is encouraged prior to beginning con-
struction.
The foundation designs and materials specified in this document are based on principles and
practices used by structural engineering professionals with years of coastal construction experi-
ence. This manual has been prepared to make the information easy to understand.
Guidance on the use of the foundation designs recommended herein is provided in Appendix
B. Examples of how the foundation designs can be used with some of the homes in the publica-
tion A Pattern Book for Gulf Coast Neighborhoods are presented in Appendix B. Design drawings for
each of the foundation types are presented in Appendix A, and any assumptions used in these
designs are in Appendix C.
T
he foundation designs proposed are suitable for homes with dimensions, weights, and roof
pitches within certain ranges of values. A licensed professional engineer should confirm
the appropriateness of the foundation design of homes with dimensions, weights, or roof
pitches that fall outside of those defined ranges.
Most of the foundation designs are based on a 14-foot wide (maximum) by 24-foot deep (mini-
mum) module (Figure 5-1). From this basic building block, foundations for specific homes
can be developed. For example, if a 30-foot deep by 42-foot wide home is to be constructed,
the foundation can be designed around three 14-foot wide by 30-foot deep sections. If a 24-foot
deep by 50-foot wide home is desired, four 12.5-foot wide by 24-foot deep sections can be used.
If a 22-foot deep home is desired, the foundation designs presented here should only be used
after a licensed professional engineer determines that they are appropriate since the shallow
depth of the building falls outside the range of assumptions used in the design.
Figure 5-1.
Schematic of a basic
module and two
footprints.
foundation designs are still valid, but geotechnical engineers will need to be involved in por-
tions of the design to determine required pile parameters. In poor soils, additional piles
may need to be installed or long piles may need to be driven; however, the portions of the
designs from the grade beams upward should remain valid.
The FEMA 550 shallow foundations are based on a presumptive bearing capacity of 1,500
psf. This value is consistent with the presumptive bearing capacity of Section 1806 of the
2009 IBC for clay, sandy clays, clayey silts, and sandy silts (CL, ML, MH, and CH soils). In
areas where soils will not provide this presumed bearing capacity, the shallow FEMA 550 de-
signs should not be used until their ability to support the required loads can be confirmed
by design professionals.
n Building weight. The foundations have been designed to resist uplift forces resulting from
a relatively light structure. If the actual home is heavier (e.g., from the use of concrete com-
posite siding or steel framing), it may be cost-effective to reanalyze and redesign the footings.
This is particularly true for a home that doesnt need to be elevated more than several feet
or has short foundation walls that can help resist uplift.
n Footprint complexity. By necessity, the foundations have been designed for relatively simple
rectangular footprints. If the actual footprint of the home is relatively complex, the engineer
may need to consider torsional wind loading, differential movement among the modules
that make up the home, concentrated loading in the homes floor and roof diaphragms,
and shear wall placement.
C
ost information that homebuilders can use to estimate the cost of installing the founda-
tion systems proposed in this manual are presented in Appendix E. These cost estimates
are based on May 2006 prices from information provided by local contractors for the First
Edition of this manual.
T
he rest of this chapter is designed to provide the user with step by step procedures for the
information contained in this manual.
1. Determine location of the dwelling on a general map. Identify the location relative to key
features such as highways and bodies of water. An accurate location is essential for using flood
and wind speed maps in subsequent steps of the design process.
n Determine the BFE or the interim Advisory Base Flood Elevations (ABFEs) for the location
from the FIRM. If the dwelling is outside of flood-prone areas, flood loads do not need to
be considered.
3. Identify the local building code. Several states and municipalities in coastal areas are adopt-
ing new building codes to govern residential construction. This manual assumes that the IRC
governs the design and construction requirements.
County/Parish/City ____________________
Building Code ____________________
Building Code Date ____________________
4. Identify the local freeboard requirements and DFE. Using either the local building codes,
local floodplain ordinances, data obtained from local building officials, or personal preferenc-
es (only if greater than minimum requirements), determine the minimum freeboard above the
BFE or ABFE. The DFE is the sum of the BFE or ABFE and freeboard values.
5. Determine the required design wind velocity. The 2006 and 2009 IRCs reference ASCE
7-05 as the source of the wind speed information.
6. Establish the topographic elevation of the building site and the dwelling. Elevations can
be obtained from official topographic maps published by the National Geodetic Survey (NGS)
and/or as established or confirmed by a surveyor.
n If the dwelling and its surrounding site are above the DFE, no flood forces need to be
considered.
n If the desired topographic elevation is below the DFE, the dwelling must be elevated above
the BFE or ABFE.
7. Determine the height of the base of the dwelling above grade. Subtract the lowest ground
elevation at the building from the lowest elevation of the structure (i.e., bottom of lowest hori-
zontal structural member).
8. Determine the general soil classification for the site. For shallow foundations, confirm
that the soils on site have a minimum bearing capacity of 1,500 psf. If soils lack that minimum ca-
pacity, contact a geotechnical engineer and/or a structural engineer to confirm that the FEMA
550 foundation solutions are appropriate.
For deep foundations, confirm that the presumptive pile capacities (for gravity loads, uplift
loads, and lateral loads) are achievable. If soils present on site will not support the presumed
pile capacities, contact a geotechnical engineer and/or a structural engineer to determine ap-
propriate pile plans.
9. Estimate erosion and scour. Estimate accumulated erosion and episodic scour over the
life of the structure. Use accumulated erosion to determine eroded grade elevation and use ac-
cumulated erosion and episodic scour to determine the foundation depth required to ensure
shallow foundations will not be undermined.
10. Determine the type of foundation to be used to support the structure. Depending on the
location of the dwelling, design wind speed, and local soil conditions documented above, select
the desired or required type of foundation. Note that more than one solution may be possible.
Refer to Chapter 4 for the potential foundation designs that can be used within the flood zones
determined from the FIRM maps. Drawings in Appendix A illustrate the construction details for
each of the foundations. Refer to the drawings for further direction and information about the
needs for each type of unit.
11. Evaluate alternate foundation type selections. The choice of foundation type may be on
the basis of least cost or to provide a personal choice, functional, or aesthetic need at the site.
Refer to Appendix E for guidance on preparing cost estimates. Functional needs such as pro-
visions for parking, storage, or other non-habitable uses for the area beneath the living space
should be considered in the selection of the foundation design. Aesthetic or architectural issues
(i.e., appearance) also must be included in the evaluation process. Guidance for the architec-
tural design considerations can be obtained from A Pattern Book for Gulf Coast Neighborhoods by
the Mississippi Governors Commission on Recovery, Rebuilding and Renewal (see Appendix
B) and from many other sources.
As part of the final analysis, it is strongly recommended that the selection and evaluation pro-
cess be coordinated with or reviewed by knowledgeable contractors or design professionals to
arrive at the best solution to fulfill all of the regulatory and functional needs for the construc-
tion.
12. Select the foundation design. If the homes dimensions, height, roof pitch, and weight
are within the ranges used to develop these designs, the foundation designs can be used as
is. However, if the proposed structure has dimensions, height, roof pitch, or weights that fall
outside of the range of values used, a licensed professional engineer should be consulted. The
materials presented in the appendices should help reduce the engineering effort needed to de-
velop a custom design. Figure 5-2 is a foundation selection decision tree for determining which
foundation design to use based on the requirements of the home. Tables 5-1a and 5-1b show
which foundation design cases can be used for one- and two-story homes, respectively, based on
height of elevation and wind velocity.
Because the designs are good for a range of buildings, they will be conservative for some ap-
plications. A licensed professional engineer will be able to provide value engineering and may
produce a more efficient design that reduces construction costs.
T
he foundation designs were developed to allow a modular approach for developing
foundation plans. In this approach, individual rectangular foundation components can
be assembled into non-rectangular building footprints (see Figures 5-3 through 5-5). Ap-
pendix D provides detailed calculations and analysis for open and closed foundation designs.
There are, however, a few rules that must be followed when assembling the modules:
1. The eave-to-ridge dimension of the roof is limited to 23 feet. The upper limit on roof
height is to limit the lateral forces to those used in developing the designs.
2. Roof slopes shall not be shallower than 3:12 or steeper than 12:12. For a 12:12 roof pitch,
this corresponds to a 42-foot deep home with a 2-foot eave overhang.
Figure 5-2.
Foundation selection decision tree.
3. The tributary load depth of the roof framing shall not exceed 23 feet, including the 2-
foot maximum roof overhang. This limit is placed to restrict uplift forces on the windward
foundation elements to those forces used in developing the design. As a practical matter,
clear span roof trusses are rarely used on roofs over 42 feet deep; therefore, this limit should
not be unduly restrictive. The roof framing that consists of multiple spans will require verti-
cal load path continuity down through the interior bearing walls to resist uplift forces on the
roof. Load path continuity can be achieved in interior bearing walls using many of the same
techniques used on exterior bearing walls.
4. On the perimeter foundation wall designs (Cases E and F), foundation shear walls must
run the full depth of the building module, and shear walls can not be spaced more than
42 feet apart.
5. All foundation modules shall be at least 24 feet deep and at least 24 feet long. Although
the basic module is limited to 42 feet long, longer home dimensions can be developed, pro-
vided that the roof does not extend beyond the building envelope as depicted in Figure 2 of
the Introduction.
Table 5-1a. Foundation Design Cases for One-Story Homes Based on Height of Elevation and Wind Velocity
* In the Coastal A zone, the tops of all footings and grade beams in Cases D and G foundations must be placed below
the maximum estimated erosion and scour depth.
Foundation Types
A = Braced timber pile
B = Steel pipe pile with concrete column and grade beam
C = Timber pile with concrete column and grade beam
D = Concrete column and grade beam
E = Reinforced masonry crawlspace
H = Timber pile with concrete grade and elevated beams and concrete columns
Table 5-1b. Foundation Design Cases for Two-Story Homes Based on Height of Elevation and Wind Velocity
* In the Coastal A zone, the tops of all footings and grade beams in Cases D and G foundations must be placed below
the maximum estimated erosion and scour depth.
** Some foundation designs are not appropriate for two-story homes for a design wind speed of 150 mph. See individual
design drawings for more details.
Foundation Types
A = Braced timber pile
B = Steel pipe pile with concrete column and grade beam
C = Timber pile with concrete column and grade beam
D = Concrete column and grade beam
E = Reinforced masonry crawlspace
F = Reinforced masonry stem wall
G = Concrete column and grade beam with integral slab
H = Timber pile with concrete grade and elevated beams and concrete columns
Figure 5-3.
T shaped modular
design.
Note A: Overall building
dimensions can exceed
42 feet. The vertical
dimensions from the eave
to the ridge roof shall not
exceed 23 feet.
Figure 5-4.
L shaped modular
design.
Note A: Overall building
dimensions can exceed
42 feet. The vertical
dimensions from the eave
to the ridge roof shall not
exceed 23 feet.
Figure 5-5.
Z shaped modular
design.
Note A: Overall building
dimensions can exceed
42 feet. The vertical
dimensions from the eave
to the ridge roof shall not
exceed 23 feet.