This document summarizes a deed of donation inter vivos with resolutory conditions regarding a property donation from Jose Hemedes to his wife Justa Kausapin in 1947. The donation was subject to conditions that the property would revert to 1) any child or heir of Jose Hemedes expressly designated by Justa Kausapin before her death or remarriage, or 2) the legal heirs of Jose Hemedes if no express designation was made. In 1960, Justa Kausapin executed a deed conveying the property to Maxima Hemedes per the first resolutory condition.
This document summarizes a deed of donation inter vivos with resolutory conditions regarding a property donation from Jose Hemedes to his wife Justa Kausapin in 1947. The donation was subject to conditions that the property would revert to 1) any child or heir of Jose Hemedes expressly designated by Justa Kausapin before her death or remarriage, or 2) the legal heirs of Jose Hemedes if no express designation was made. In 1960, Justa Kausapin executed a deed conveying the property to Maxima Hemedes per the first resolutory condition.
This document summarizes a deed of donation inter vivos with resolutory conditions regarding a property donation from Jose Hemedes to his wife Justa Kausapin in 1947. The donation was subject to conditions that the property would revert to 1) any child or heir of Jose Hemedes expressly designated by Justa Kausapin before her death or remarriage, or 2) the legal heirs of Jose Hemedes if no express designation was made. In 1960, Justa Kausapin executed a deed conveying the property to Maxima Hemedes per the first resolutory condition.
This document summarizes a deed of donation inter vivos with resolutory conditions regarding a property donation from Jose Hemedes to his wife Justa Kausapin in 1947. The donation was subject to conditions that the property would revert to 1) any child or heir of Jose Hemedes expressly designated by Justa Kausapin before her death or remarriage, or 2) the legal heirs of Jose Hemedes if no express designation was made. In 1960, Justa Kausapin executed a deed conveying the property to Maxima Hemedes per the first resolutory condition.
Entitled Dominium Realty and Construction Corporation and
Enrique D. Hemedes vs. R & B Insurance Corporation and Maxima
Hemedes. 3
Annex D of Maxima Hemedes Petition; Rollo, pp. 113-114.
356
356
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED
Hemedes vs. Court of Appeals
wife, Justa Kausapin, subject to the following resolutory
conditions: (a) Upon the death or remarriage of the DONEE, the title to the property donated shall revert to any of the children, or their heirs, of the DONOR expressly designated by the DONEE in a public document conveying the property to the latter; or (b) In absence of such an express designation made by the DONEE before her death or remarriage contained in a public instrument as above provided, the title to the property shall automatically revert to the legal heirs of the DONOR in common. Pursuant to the first condition abovementioned, Justa Kausapin executed on September 27, 1960 a Deed of4 Conveyance of Unregistered Real Property by Reversion conveying to Maxima Hemedes the subject property under the following terms That the said parcel of land was donated unto me by the said Jose Hemedes, my deceased husband, in a deed of DONATION INTER VIVOS WITH RESOLUTORY CONDITIONS executed by the donor in my favor, and duly accepted by me on March 22, 1947, before Notary Public Luis Bella in Cabuyao, Laguna; That the donation is subject to the resolutory conditions appearing in the said deed of DONATION INTER VIVOS WITH RESOLUTORY CONDITIONS, as follows: (a) Upon the death or remarriage of the DONEE, the title to the property donated shall revert to any of the children, or their heirs, of the DONOR expressly designated by the DONEE in a public document conveying the property to the latter; or
United States v. Leon E. Boomershine Ann Cramer, Individually and as Trustee of the Leon Eugene Boomershine Irrevocable Trust and the Gene Boomershine Irrevocable Trust Duane Cramer Jacqueline Helscel Dena Helscel and Tammy Helscel, and Mary M. Boomershine, 968 F.2d 1224, 10th Cir. (1992)