Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Maciano Vs Brimo

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

TITLE: Juan Miciano v Andre Brimo

CITATION: GR No.22595, November 1, 1927| 50 Phil 867


FACTS:
Juan Miciano, judicial administrator of the estate in question,
filed a scheme of partition. Andre Brimo, one of the brothers
of the deceased (Joseph Brimo) opposed Micianos
participation in the inheritance. Joseph Brimo is a Turkish
citizen.
ISSUE: Whether Turkish law or Philippine law will be the basis
on the distribution of Joseph Brimos estates.
HELD:
Though the last part of the second clause of the will expressly
said that it be made and disposed of in accordance with the
laws in force in the Philippine Island, this condition, described
as impossible conditions, shall be considered as not imposed
and shall not prejudice the heir or legatee in any manner
whatsoever,
even
should
the
testator
otherwise
provide. Impossible conditions are further defined as those
contrary to law or good morals. Thus, national law of the
testator shall govern in his testamentary dispositions.
The court approved the scheme of partition submitted by the
judicial administrator, in such manner as to include Andre
Brimo, as one of the legatees.

You might also like