Juan Miciano filed a scheme of partition for the estate of Joseph Brimo, a Turkish citizen. Andre Brimo opposed Miciano's participation and argued that Turkish law, not Philippine law, should govern the distribution of Brimo's estate. The court held that the condition in Brimo's will stating Philippine law should apply was an impossible condition and should be disregarded. National law of the testator, in this case Turkish law, shall govern testamentary dispositions. The court approved Miciano's partition scheme to include Andre Brimo as a legatee according to Turkish law.
Juan Miciano filed a scheme of partition for the estate of Joseph Brimo, a Turkish citizen. Andre Brimo opposed Miciano's participation and argued that Turkish law, not Philippine law, should govern the distribution of Brimo's estate. The court held that the condition in Brimo's will stating Philippine law should apply was an impossible condition and should be disregarded. National law of the testator, in this case Turkish law, shall govern testamentary dispositions. The court approved Miciano's partition scheme to include Andre Brimo as a legatee according to Turkish law.
Juan Miciano filed a scheme of partition for the estate of Joseph Brimo, a Turkish citizen. Andre Brimo opposed Miciano's participation and argued that Turkish law, not Philippine law, should govern the distribution of Brimo's estate. The court held that the condition in Brimo's will stating Philippine law should apply was an impossible condition and should be disregarded. National law of the testator, in this case Turkish law, shall govern testamentary dispositions. The court approved Miciano's partition scheme to include Andre Brimo as a legatee according to Turkish law.
Juan Miciano filed a scheme of partition for the estate of Joseph Brimo, a Turkish citizen. Andre Brimo opposed Miciano's participation and argued that Turkish law, not Philippine law, should govern the distribution of Brimo's estate. The court held that the condition in Brimo's will stating Philippine law should apply was an impossible condition and should be disregarded. National law of the testator, in this case Turkish law, shall govern testamentary dispositions. The court approved Miciano's partition scheme to include Andre Brimo as a legatee according to Turkish law.
CITATION: GR No.22595, November 1, 1927| 50 Phil 867
FACTS: Juan Miciano, judicial administrator of the estate in question, filed a scheme of partition. Andre Brimo, one of the brothers of the deceased (Joseph Brimo) opposed Micianos participation in the inheritance. Joseph Brimo is a Turkish citizen. ISSUE: Whether Turkish law or Philippine law will be the basis on the distribution of Joseph Brimos estates. HELD: Though the last part of the second clause of the will expressly said that it be made and disposed of in accordance with the laws in force in the Philippine Island, this condition, described as impossible conditions, shall be considered as not imposed and shall not prejudice the heir or legatee in any manner whatsoever, even should the testator otherwise provide. Impossible conditions are further defined as those contrary to law or good morals. Thus, national law of the testator shall govern in his testamentary dispositions. The court approved the scheme of partition submitted by the judicial administrator, in such manner as to include Andre Brimo, as one of the legatees.
Testate Estate of Joseph G. Brimo, JUAN MICIANO, Administrator, Petitioner-Appellee, vs. ANDRE BRIMO, Opponent-Appellant. G.R. No. L-22595 November 1, 1927