Reyneke2015.PDF Bsso Steps
Reyneke2015.PDF Bsso Steps
Reyneke2015.PDF Bsso Steps
Ramus Osteotomy
Johan P. Reyneke, BChD, MChD, FCMOS (SA), PhD a,b,c,d,e,*,
Carlo Ferretti, BDS, MDent (MFOS), FCD (SA) MFOS f
KEYWORDS
Mandibular repositioning Mandubular osteotomy Internal rigid fixation Surgical sequence
KEY POINTS
Introduction
The correction of dentofacial deformities demands accurate
treatment planning for the orthodontic preparation and subsequent surgery. It is also mandatory that the surgical correction be performed accurately to ensure predictable and
successful outcomes. This article describes the technique for
the sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy in a step-by-step
fashion with tips and traps with each step.
In 1970, J M Ferrer in said: it must be recognized that at
every operation the surgeon inevitably injures the patient; this
injury can and must be minimized by the use of careful, gentle,
and accurate surgical technique.
Sound technical craft, science, and operating experience all
come together to make most surgical procedures occur
smoothly and successfully. No 2 surgeons surgical techniques
are identical; however, there are certain basic principles that
have to be adhered to when performing orthognathic surgery.
This will not only ensure good surgical outcome but also limit
complications. Moreover, important details of diagnosis and
The authors declare that there are no commercial or financial conflicts of interest as well as any funding sources regarding the work.
a
Department of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, University of the
Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
b
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
c
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Florida
College of Dentistry, Gainesville, FL, USA
d
Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Universidad Autonoma de
Nueva Leon, Monterrey, Mexico
e
Center for Orthognathic Surgery, Cape Town Mediclinic, Cape Town
8001, South Africa
f
Department of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Faculty of Health
Sciences, Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
* Corresponding author. Department of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
E-mail address: johanrey@worldonline.co.za
Atlas Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin N Am - (2015) -e1061-3315/15/$ - see front matter 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cxom.2015.10.005
management of operative complications are difficult to master, since no 2 complications are ever identical.
Although the anatomy and shape of the human mandible
lends itself to splitting in a sagittal plane, the surgical
osteotomy of the mandible remains a challenging procedure.
Over the last 30 years, the ingenuity of modifications1,2 to the
original technique as described by Obwegeser and Trauner in
1955,3 development of special instruments,4 and improvement
of surgical skills have made it possible to achieve surgical goals
relatively quickly and atraumatically. The surgical repositioning of the mandible has developed from a life-threatening
procedure to outpatient surgery (in some parts of the world).5
Each surgeon should develop a routine that will enable the
surgical team to anticipate each step, thus increasing efficiency and decreasing operating time and eventually limit
postoperative morbidity.6
The surgical technique of the sagittal split mandibular
ramus osteotomy can be performed in 32 steps. Each step will
have certain tips and traps.
oralmaxsurgeryatlas.theclinics.com
2
At least 5 mm of nonkeratinized mucosa should be left
buccally at the lower end of the incision for ease of suturing
later.
Alternative techniques
Some surgeons make use of a bone clamp to hold the segments
in position. However, there is a danger that the segments will
be compressed, which may lead to peripheral condylar sag.
Fig. 4 (A) The completed sagittal osteotomy is demonstrated
(arrow 1). Start the buccal osteotomy at the inferior border and
connect it to the vertical osteotomy (arrow 2). (B) The buccal
osteotomy is completed in a slight posterior medial direction to
facilitate the introduction of the Reyneke splitting osteotome and
to initiate and direct the split in the proper direction.
Fig. 6 (A) A 6 mm mandibular advancement is planned. Arrows show removal of a segment of bone from the anterior part of the proximal
segment. The positioning holes are therefore drilled 10 mm apart with the anterior hole on the distal segment (1). Following 6 mm
advancement, the holes will be 4 mm apart with the wire in a Class II direction supporting the condyle (2). (B) A 6 mm mandibular setback
is planned. The positioning holes are drilled 2 mm apart with the anterior hole on the proximal segment (1). Following a 6 mm setback of
the distal segment, the holes will be 4 mm apart with the wire in a Class II direction supporting the condyle (2).
Step 12dlavage
Wash the surgical area thoroughly with saline solution and
gently place a small sponge in it. Once the osteotomy cuts have
been completed on one side, it is recommended that the other
side to be completed before proceeding to split the mandible.
First stage
Fig. 7 The hole for the condylar positioner is made on the lower
border of the proximal segment (1). Reference lines are marked
over the buccal osteotomy line (2). The sagittal osteotomy is
initiated by tapping along the vertical osteotomy with a 10 mm
osteotome (3).
Fig. 8 A Reyneke splitter is placed into the buccal osteotomy on the lower border of the mandible (1). The splitter and an osteotome,
placed into the superior aspect of the vertical osteotomy, are gently rotated (1 & 2). The lower border should separate from the distal
segment including the lower border of the mandible (3).
Second stage
Rotate the instruments further.
The lower border should continue to split toward the
proximal segment, and the neurovascular bundle should detach
from the proximal segment.
6
When the inferior alveolar canal splits toward the proximal
side, the surgeon should stop the procedure and carefully
dissect the medial wall of the canal from the proximal segment
using a small osteotome. Use a small nontoothed forceps to
remove the bony canal from the bundle.
7
Fig. 11 summarizes the four typical patterns of bad splits
that may occur.
Step 17
Fig. 10 The split has been completed; however, the neurovascular bundle, lingula, and superior aspect of the inferior alveolar canal remains attached to the proximal segment (arrow).
Early diagnosis
Carefully remove the impacted third molar tooth. Use plate
fixation.
Late diagnosis
Remove the impacted third molar tooth. Take care not to
damage the inferior alveolar nerve. Use plate fixation.
Fig. 11 The 4 typical fracture lines of bad splits are demonstrated: buccal plate fracture (1), buccal plate fracture including
the coronoid process (2), a fracture short of the lingula (3), and a
retromolar fracture (4).
8
The presence of impacted third molars during the SSO will
often prevent ideal bone contact and may also weaken the
retromolar aspect of the distal segment. Remove the third
molars and take care not to damage the inferior alveolar nerve
or fracture the retromolar bone. The presence of a third molar
(or tooth socket) will jeopardize the placement of rigid
fixation.
Feed a 0.018-inch wire (25 gauge) through the holes (see Step 9).
Step 20
Note the position of the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle
and the socket of the third molar (if a tooth was present and
removed).
Use a sharp drill and apply light pressure with the trocar
when drilling the holes. Undue pressure may displace the bone
segments, the condyle or the occlusion.
Use copious water cooling. If the shaft of the drill is
forced against the trocar, it will generate heat and burn the
skin and subcutaneous tissue in contact with the tube of the
trocar.
Angle the holes lightly backward to support the repositioned
condyle.
Once a hole is drilled the assistant should load the screw
with an appropriate length on the screwdriver, (a motorized
screwdriver is a handy instrument at this time).
View the bone segments carefully when applying the screw
to ensure the screw engages the lingual cortex without displacing the position of the segments.
Keep in mind that bicortical screws are self-tapping and
need only to be turned to engage. No excessive force is
required.
Make sure that the segments are not compressed or any
intersegmental gaps should not be closed by tightening the
screws. This will displace the condyle and result in peripheral
sag.
The small bone defects should be grafted.
Plate fixation
To ensure that the condyles will settle and have been positioned correctly, the occlusion should not be checked
10
References