TL - DR Final
TL - DR Final
TL - DR Final
RRL
-
TEACHERS
COMPETENCE
AUTONOMY
SUPPORT
Take note:
1. Science motivation getting more science course in HS (enrolling to science
courses)
2. Intention Pursuing a science degree
3. Behavioral outcome is working/job from that degree
Arguments:
1. Reeve (2006) based on his research, stated that autonomy supportive teaching
style represents and important variable that contributes to a high quality
relationship between teachers and students
2. Autonomy support from social agents such as teachers, parents, peers positively
influences students needs satisfaction of autonomy and competence
3. Recent study (2005) showed that parents autonomy support as well positively
influences childs needs satisfaction which predicted their persistence within
science program
4. Deci and William (2006) research also stated that med students who had
autonomive-support from instructors have become more autonomous in learning
over a 6-month period.
Figure 2: PERCEIVED COMPETENCE AND AUTONOMY
-
Participants are divided based their scoring of Future Intentions in taking a science
course (High Intentions / Low Intentions) because they hypothesized that Higher
Intentions of pursuing a science degree will have higher self-determination motivation
Result:
1.
2.
3.
4.
High intentions have higher intrinsic motivation and identified regulated motiv
Low intentions have higher of introjected and amotivation
No significant difference between female and male on motivation subscale
High science intentions perceived their science teachers as supporting sign. more
their sense of autonomy
5. No main effect for gender / no int
Gap:
1. Future research suggests to assess the role of other significant individuals such as
parents, peers, and school administration to science motivation
a. We can derive another conceptual framework in our thesis using the 3
psych needs na and direct link na to science motivation
2. Teachers autonomy support was based on students own perception it is
suggested that it would help by the assessment of a trained observer to become
more objective, however Smith, Roll and Curtis, 1979 revealed that students own
perception is correlated more strongly
3. Future research using data from other sources such as parents-report, peer-report
would be highly informative
4. Used of experiment design would be helpful but we cannot do that ofc
NEW CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK WOULD BE:
Relatedness
Autonomy
Competence