Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    Smith v. Dixon, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal by Tywann D. Smith of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in its opinion. The appellate court declined to hear oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Smith v. Dixon, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal by Tywann D. Smith of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in its opinion. The appellate court declined to hear oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-08-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6659

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal by Tywann D. Smith of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in its opinion. The appellate court declined to hear oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Smith v. Dixon, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal by Tywann D. Smith of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in its opinion. The appellate court declined to hear oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6659

    TYWANN D. SMITH,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DAVE M. DIXON; PAULA W. CREED; MICHAEL ROACH,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    CHRISTOPHER J. DIAZ; ROBERT C. MARTIN, JR.;
    AMBER L. MORTON; CLIFFORD W. VAUGHN,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District


    District of North Carolina, at Durham.
    District Judge. (CA-99-281)

    Submitted:

    August 15, 2002

    Court for the Middle


    James A. Beaty, Jr.,

    Decided:

    August 20, 2002

    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Tywann D. Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
    John Payne Scherer, II,
    Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Tywann D. Smith appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion accepting
    the magistrate judges recommendation and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Smith v. Dixon, No. CA-99-281 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 6, 2002). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like