Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    Merritt v. United States, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by H. Leon Merritt against the United States. The district court had dismissed Merritt's tort case and denied reconsideration. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings and dispensing with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Merritt v. United States, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views3 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by H. Leon Merritt against the United States. The district court had dismissed Merritt's tort case and denied reconsideration. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings and dispensing with oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-03-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-2003

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by H. Leon Merritt against the United States. The district court had dismissed Merritt's tort case and denied reconsideration. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings and dispensing with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    6 views3 pages

    Merritt v. United States, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by H. Leon Merritt against the United States. The district court had dismissed Merritt's tort case and denied reconsideration. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings and dispensing with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-2003

    H. LEON MERRITT,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Defendant - Appellee,
    and
    STEVEN MEYERS; KENNETH DORNER,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
    Judge. (CA-04-442-1)

    Submitted:

    February 25, 2005

    Decided:

    March 16, 2005

    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Bernard R. Corbett, LAW OFFICE OF BERNARD R. CORBETT, Alexandria,


    Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney,

    Dennis C. Barghaan, Jr., Assistant


    Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

    United

    States

    Attorney,

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    - 2 -

    PER CURIAM:
    H. Leon Merritt appeals the district courts orders
    dismissing his tort case and denying reconsideration.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
    affirm

    for

    the

    reasons

    stated

    by

    the

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    district

    court.

    See

    Merritt v. United States, No. CA-04-442-1 (E.D. Va. filed June 16


    and entered June 18, 2004; filed July 16 and entered July 19,
    2004).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 3 -

    You might also like