Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Jones v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Charles Mason Jones under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various Virginia Department of Corrections officials and entities. The district court denied Jones relief and Jones appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Court dispensed with oral arguments, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Jones v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views3 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Charles Mason Jones under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various Virginia Department of Corrections officials and entities. The district court denied Jones relief and Jones appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Court dispensed with oral arguments, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-03-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-7441

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Charles Mason Jones under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various Virginia Department of Corrections officials and entities. The district court denied Jones relief and Jones appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Court dispensed with oral arguments, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    3 views3 pages

    Jones v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Charles Mason Jones under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various Virginia Department of Corrections officials and entities. The district court denied Jones relief and Jones appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Court dispensed with oral arguments, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-7441

    CHARLES MASON JONES,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    RONALD ANGELONE, Director, Department of Corrections; DAVID L. GRAHAM, Assistant Warden;
    SAMUEL L. BATTS, Assistant Warden; CAPTAIN
    BRUCE; JOHN B. METZGER, III, Chairman, Virginia Parole Board; FRED W. GREENE, Warden;
    SERGEANT WINCKLER; C. TAYLOR, Treatment
    Supervisor; NURSE HARRIS; DEPARTMENT OF
    CORRECTIONS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.
    (CA-95-195)
    Submitted:

    March 13, 1997

    Decided:

    March 19, 1997

    Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Charles Mason Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Wirt Peebles Marks, IV,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
    his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jones
    v. Angelone, No. CA-95-195 (E.D. Va. Aug. 21, 1996). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like