Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Jimenez v. Astrue, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Rosemary L. Jimenez against the Commissioner of Social Security, the United States Merit System Protection Board, and the United States Office of Personnel Management. The district court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the case for the reasons stated in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Jimenez v. Astrue, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Rosemary L. Jimenez against the Commissioner of Social Security, the United States Merit System Protection Board, and the United States Office of Personnel Management. The district court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the case for the reasons stated in its opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-10-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-1147

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Rosemary L. Jimenez against the Commissioner of Social Security, the United States Merit System Protection Board, and the United States Office of Personnel Management. The district court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the case for the reasons stated in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Jimenez v. Astrue, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Rosemary L. Jimenez against the Commissioner of Social Security, the United States Merit System Protection Board, and the United States Office of Personnel Management. The district court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the case for the reasons stated in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-1147

    ROSEMARY L. JIMENEZ,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security; NEIL A.G.
    MCPHIE, United States Merit System Protection Board; LINDA M.
    SPRINGER, United States Office of Personnel Management,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:06cv-01446-JFM)

    Submitted:

    September 11, 2008

    Decided:

    October 3, 2008

    Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Rosemary L. Jimenez, Appellant Pro Se. James A. Frederick, GOODELL


    DEVRIES LEECH & DANN, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Alex Samuel Gordon,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Allen F. Loucks, Jennifer
    Wright Schick, Assistant United States Attorneys, Baltimore,
    Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Rosemary L. Jimenez appeals the district courts order
    granting the Defendants motion to dismiss.
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    Jimenez v. Astrue, No.

    1:06-cv-01446-JFM (D. Md. Dec. 20, 2006).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like