United States v. Heijnen, 10th Cir. (2007)
United States v. Heijnen, 10th Cir. (2007)
United States v. Heijnen, 10th Cir. (2007)
February 2, 2007
Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court
Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant Antonius M aria Heijnen, appearing pro se, appeals from his
conviction and sentence for one count of conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
371; one count of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1343; three counts of
using wire fraud proceeds to promote illegal activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
1956(a)(1)(A)(i); and one count of money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of
this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is
therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is
not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata,
and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value
consistent w ith Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
-2-
-4-
-5-