23rd May, 1936

Dear Mr. Jinnah,

Thank you so much for your letter which I received a moment ago. I am glad to see that your
work is progressing. I do hope that the Punjab parties-specially the Ahrar and the Ittihad Millatwill eventually, after some bickering, join you. A very enthusiastic and active member of the
Ittihad told me so a few days ago. About M. Zafar Ali Khan the Ittihad people do not themselves
feel sure. However there is plenty of time yet, and we shall soon see how the electorate generally
feels about the Ittihad sending their men to the Assembly.
Hoping you are well and looking forward to meeting you.
Yours sincerely,
(Sd.) Mohammad Iqbal
Lahore
9th June, 1936
My dear Mr. Jinnah,
I am sending you my draft. Also a cutting from the Eastern Times of yesterday. This is a letter
from an Intelligent Pleader of Guradspur.

I hope the statement issued by the Board will fully argue the whole scheme and will meet all the
objection is so far advanced against it. It must frankly state as present position of the Indian
Muliins as regards both the Government and the Hindus. It must warn the Muslims of India that
unless the present scheme is adopted the Muslims will lose all that they have gained during the
last 15 years and will seriously harm, and in fact, shatter their own solidarity with their own
hands.
Yours etc.,
(Sd.) Mohammad Iqbal
p.s. Will feel much obliged if you send the statement to me before it is sent to the press.
Another point which should be brought out in the statement is as follows:
1. Indirect election to the Central Assembly has made it absolutely essential that Muslim
representatives returned to the Provincial Assemblies should be bound by an All-India Muslim
policy and programme so that they should return to the Central Assembly only those Muslims
who would be pledged to support the specific Muslim questions connected with the Central
subjects and arising out of their position as the Second great nation of India. Those who are now
for Provincial policies and programme were themselves instrumental in getting in direct elections
for the Central Assembly introduced into the constitution obviously because this suited a foreign
Government. Now when the community wants to make the best use of this misfortune (i.e
indirect elections) by proposing an all-India scheme of elections (e.g. League scheme) to be
adhered to by the Provincial candidates the same men, again, at the instance of a foreign
Government have come out to defeat the community in their effort to retain its solidarity as a
nation.
2. Question of Wakf Law arising out of Shahidganj, culture, language, mosque and personal law.
Private and Confidential,
Lahore
25th June 1936
My dear Mr. Jinnah
Sir Sikandar Hayat left Lahore a day or two ago. I think he will meet you at Bombay and have a
talk with you about certain matters of importance. Daultana saw me yesterday evening. He tells
me that the Muslim members of the Unionist Party are prepared to make the following
declaration

That in all matters specific to the Muslim community as an all-India minority they will be
bound by the decision of the League and will never make any pact with any nom-Muslims group
in the Provincial Assembly.
Provided the League (Provincial) makes the following declaration:
That those returned to the Provincial Assembly on the League ticket will co-operate with that
party or group which has the largest number of Muslims.
Please let me know at your earliest convenience what you think of this proposal. Also let me
know the result of your talk with Sir Sikandar Hayat. If you succeed in convincing him he may
come to our side.
Hoping you are well,
Yours sincerely,
(Sd.) Mohammad Iqbal
Mayo Road, Lahore
23rd August, 1936
M dear Mr. Jinnah,
I hope my letter reached you all right. There is some talk of an understanding between the Punjab
Parliamentary Bard and the Unionist Party. I should like you to let me know what you think of
such a compromise and to suggest conditions for the same. I read in the papers that you have
brought about a compromise between the Bengal Proja Party and the Parliamentary Board. I
should like to know the terms and the conditions. Since the Proja Party is non-communal like the
Unionist, your compromise in Bengal may be helpful to you.
Hoping you are well,
Yours sincerely,
(Sd.) Mohammad Iqbal
Strictly Confidential.
20th March 1937

My dear Mr. Jinnah

I suppose you have read Pandit Jawaharlal Nehrus address to the All-India National Convention
and that you fully realise the policy under-lying it in so far as Indian Muslims are concerned. I
believe you are also aware that the new constitution has at least bought a unique opportunity
Indian Muslims for self-organisation in view of the future political developments both in India
and Muslim Asia. While we re ready to co-operate with other Progressive Parties in the country,
we must not ignore the fact that the whole future of Islam as a moral and political force in Asia
rests very largely on a complete organisation of Indian Muslims. I therefore suggest that an
effective reply should be given to the All-India National Convention. You should immediately
hold an All-India Muslim Convention in Delhi to which you should invite members of the new
Provincial Assemblies as well as other prominent Muslim leaders. To this convention you must
restate as clearly and as strongly as possible the political objective of the Indian Muslims as a
distinct political unit in the country. It is absolutely necessary to tell the world both inside and
outside India that the economic problem is not the only problem in the country. From the Muslim
point of view the cultural problem is of much greater consequence to most Indian Muslims. At
any rate it is not less important than the economic problem. If you could hold this Convention, it
would test the credentials of those Muslim Legislators who have formed parties contrary to the
aims and aspirations of Indian Muslims. It would farther make it clear to the Hindus that no
political device, however subtle can make the Indian Muslim lose sight of his cultural enilty. I
am coming to Delhi in a few days time and hope to have a talk with you on this important matter.
I shall be staying in the Afghan Consulate. If you could spare a few moments we should meet
there. Please drop a line in reply to this letter a early as possible.
Yours sincerely,
(Sd.) Mohammad Iqbal
Bar-at-Law
p. s. Please excuse me. I have got this letter written by a friend as my eyesight is getting bad.
22nd April 1937
My dear Mr. Jinnah
I do not know whether my letter which I posted to you about two weeks ago ever reached you. I
posted it to your address at New Delhi and when I went to Delhi later I discovered that you had
already left Delhi. In that letter I proposed that we should hold immediately an All-India Muslim
Convention, say at Delhi, and once more to restate the policy of Indian Muslims both to the
Government and to the Hindus.
As the situation is becoming grave and the Muslim feeling in the Punjab is rapidly becoming
pro-Congress for reasons which it is unnecessary to detail I would request you to consider and

decide the matter as early as possible. The session of the All India Muslim League is postponed
till August, and the situation demands an early restatement of the Musllm policy. If the
Convention is preceded by a tour of prominent Muslim leaders, the meeting of the Convention is
sure to be a great success. Please drop a line in reply to this letter as early as possible.
Yours sincerely
(Sd.) Mohammad Iqbal
Bar-at-Law
Confidential,
28th May, 1937
My dear Mr. Jinnah,
Thank you so much for your letter which reached me in due course. I am glad to hear that you
will bear in mind what I wrote to you about the changes in the constitution and programme of the
League. I have no doubt that you fully realise the gravity of the situation as far as Muslim India
is concerned. The League will have to finally decide whether it will remain a body representing
the upper classes of Indian Muslims or Muslim masses who have so far with good reason, taken
no interest in it. Personally I believe that a political organisation which gives no promise of
improving the lot of the average Muslim can not attract our masses.
Under the new constitution the higher posts go to the sons of upper classes; the smaller ones go
to the friends or relatives of the ministers. In other matters too our political institution have never
thought of improving the lot of Muslims generally. The problem of bread is becoming more and
more acute. The Muslim has begun to feel that he has been going down and down during the last
200 years. Ordinarily he believes that his poverty is due to Hindu money-lending or capitalism.
The perception that it is equally due to foreign rule has not yet fully come to him. But it is bound
to come. The atheistic socialism of Jawaharlal is not likely to receive much response from the
Muslims. The question therefore is: how is it possible to solve the problem of Muslim poverty?
And the whole future of the League depends on the Leagues activity to solve this question. If the
League can give no such promises I am sure that Muslim masses will remain indifferent to it as
before. Happily there is a solution in the enforcement of the Law of Islam and its further
development in the light of modern ideas. After a long and careful study of Islamic Law I have
come to the conclusion that if this system of Law is properly understood and applied, at last the
right to subsistence is secured to everybody. But the enforcement and development of the Shariat
of Islam is impossible in this country without a free Muslim state or states. This has been my
honest conviction for many years and I still believe this to be the only way to solve the problem
of bread for Muslims as well as to secure a peaceful India. If such a thing is impossible in India
the only other alternative is a civil war which as a matter of fact has been going on for some time
in the shape of Hindu-Muslim riots. I fear that in certain parts of the country, e.g. N.-W. India,

Palestine may be repeated. Also the insertion of Jawaharlals socialism into the body politic of
Hinduism is likely to cause much bloodshed among the Hindus themselves. The issue between
social democracy and Brahmanism is not dissimilar to the one between Brahmanism and
Buddhism. Whether the fate of socialism will be the same as the fate of Buddhism in India I can
not say. But it is clear to my mind that if Hinduism accepts social demopracy it must necessarily
cease to be Hindaism. For Islam the acpeptance of social democracy in some suitable form and
consistent with the legal principles of Islam is not a revolution but a return to the original purity
of Islam. The modern problems therefore are more easy to solve for the Muslims than for the
Hindus. But as I have said above in order to make it possible for Muslim India to solve the
problems it is necessary to redistribute the country and to provide one or more Muslim states
with absolute majorities. Dont you think that the Lime for such a demand has already arrived?
Perhaps this is the best reply you can give to the atheistic socialism of Jawaharlal Nehru.
Anyhow I have given you my own thoughts in the hope that you will give them serious
consideration either in your address or in the discussions of the coming session of the League.
Muslim India hopes that at this serious juncture your genius will discover some way out of our
present difficulties.
Yours sincerely,
(Sd.) Muhammad Iqbal
P.S. On the subject-matter of the letter I intended to Write to you a long and open letter in the
press. But on further consideration I felt that the present moment was not suitable for such step.
Private and Confidential,
June 21st, 1937
My dear Mr. Jinnah,
Thank you so much for your letter which I received yesterday. I know yan are a busy man; but I
do hope you wont mind my writing to you so often, as you are the only Muslim in India today to
Whom the community has a right to look up for safe guidance through the storm which is
coming to North-West India, and perhaps to the Whole of India. I tell you that we are actually
living in a state of civil war which, but for the police and military, would, become universal in no
time. During the last few months there has been a series of Hindu-Muslim riots In India. In
North-West India alone there have been at least three riots during the last three months and at
least four cases of vilification of the Prophet by Hindus and Sikhs. In each of the four cases the
vilifier has been murdered. There have also been cases of burning of the Quran in Sind. I have
carefully studied the whole situation and believe that the real cause of these event is neither
religious nor economic. It is purely political, i.e., the desire of the Sikhs and Hindus to
intermediate Muslims even in the Muslim majority provinces. And the new constitution is such
that even in the Muslim majority provinces, the Muslims are made entirely dependent on nonMuslims. The result is that the Muslim Ministry can take no proper action and are even driven to

do injustice to Muslims partly to please those on whom they depend and partly to show that they
are absolutely impartial. Thus it is clear that we have our specific reasons to reject this
constitution. It seems to me that the new constitution is devised only to placate the Hindus. In the
Hindu majority provinces, the Hindus have of course absolute majorities, and can ignore
Muslims, altogether. In Muslim majority provinces, the Muslims are made entirely dependent on
Hindus. I have no doubt in my mind that this constitution is calculated to do infinite harm to the
Indian Muslims. Apart from this it is no solution of the economic problem which is so acute
among Muslims. The only thing that the communal award grants to Muslims is the recognition of
their political existence in India. But such a recognition granted to a people whom this
constitution does not and cannot help in solving their problem of poverty can be of no value to
them. The Congress President has denied the political existence of Muslims in no unmistakable
terms. The other Hindu political body, i.e., the Mahasabha, whom I regard as the real
representative of the masses of the Hindus, has declared more than once that a united HinduMuslim nation is impossible in India. In these circumstances it is obvious that the only way to a
peaceful India is redistribution of the country on the lines of racial, religious and linguistic
affinities. Many British statesmen also realise this, and the Hindu-Muslim riots which are rapidly
coming in the wake of this constitution are sure further to open their eyes to the real situation in
the country. I remember Lord Lothain told me before I left England that my scheme as the only
possible solution of the troubles of India, but that it would take 25 years to come. Some Muslims
in the Punjab are already suggesting the holding of a North-West Indian Muslim Conference, and
the idea is rapidly spreading. I agree with you, however, that our community is not yet
sufficiently organised and disciplined and perhaps the time for holding such a conference is not
yet ripe. But I feel that it would be highly advisable for you to indicate in your address at least
the line of action that the Muslims of North-West India would be finally driven to take.
To my mind the new constitution with its ides o a single Indian federation is completely
hopeless. A separate federation of Muslim provinces reformed on the lines I have suggested
above, is the only course by which we can secure a peaceful India and save Muslims from the
domination of non-Muslims. Why should not the Muslims of North-West India and Bengal be
considered as nation entitled to Self-determination just as other nation as in India and outside
India are?
Personally I think that the Muslims of North-West India and Bengal ought are present to ignore
Muslim minority provinces. This is th best course to adopt in the interest of both Muslim
majority and minority provinces It will therefore be better to hold the coming session of the
League in the Punjab, and not in a Muslim minority province. The monhth of August is bad in,
Lahore. I think you should seriously consider the advisability of holding the coming session at
Lahore in the middle of October when the weather is quite good in Lahore. The interest in the
All-India Muslim League is rapidly growing in the Punjab, and the holding of the coming session
in Lahore is likely to give a fresh political awakening to the Punjab Muslims.
Yours sincerely,
(Sd.) Mohammad Iqbal
Bar-at-Law

11th August, 1937

My dear Mr. Jinnah,
Events have made it abundantly clear that the League ought to concentrate all its activities on the
North-West Indian Musalmans. The League office bf Delhi informed Mr. Ghulam Rasool that the
dates of the sessions of the Muslim League have not been fixed as yet.
This being so I fear it will not be possible to hold the sessions in August and September. I,
therefore, repeat my request that the League sessions may be held in Lahore in the middle or end
of October. The enthusiasm for the League is rapidly increasing in the Punjab, and I have no
doubt that the holding of the session in Lahore will be a turning point in the history of the
League and an important step towards mass contact. Please drop a line in reply.
Yours sincerely,
(Sd.) Mohammad Iqbal
Bar-at-Law
Private and Confidential
7th October, 1937
My dear Mr. Jinnah,
A strong contingent from the Punjab is expected to attend The Lucknow Session of the League.
The Unionist Muslims are also making preparations to attend under the leadership of Sir
Sikandar Hayat. We are living in difficult times and the Indian Muslims expect that your address
will give the clearest possible lead in all matters relating to the future of the community. I
suggest that the League may state or restate its policy relating to the communal award in the
shape of a suitable resolution. In the Punjab and I hear also in Sind attempts are being made by
misguided Muslims themselves to alter it in the interests of the Hindus. Such men fondly believe
that by pleasing the Hindus they will be able to retain their power. I personally believe that since
the British Government wants to honour the Hindus who would welcome the upsetter of the
communal award they (the British Government) are trying to get it upset through their Muslim
agents.
I shall prepare a list of 28 persons for the vacancies in the League Council. Mr. Ghulain Rasool
will show you this list. I do hope that this choice will be carefully made. Our men will leave
Lahore on the 13th.

The Palestine question is very much agitating the minds of the Muslims. We have a very fine
opportunity for mass contact for the purposes of the League. I have no doubt that the League will
pass a strong resolution on this question and also by holding a private conference of the leaders
decide on some sort of a positive action in which masses may share in large numbers. This will at
once popularise the League and may help the Palestine Arabs. Personally I would not mind going
to jail on an issue which affects both Islam and India. The formation bf a Western base on the
very gates of the East is a menace to both.
With best wishes.
Yours sincerely,
(Sd.) Mohammad Iqbal
Bar-at-Law
P.S. The League should resolve that no province should come to any understanding with other
communities regarding the communal award. This is an All-India question and must be settled by
the League alohe. Perhaps you may go further and say that the present atmosphere is not at all
suitable for any communal understanding.
Private and Confidential,
30th october; 1937
My dear Mr. Jinnah,
I suppose you have already read the resolution passed by the A.-I.C C. Your move in time has
saved the situation, and we are all waiting for your observations on the Congress, resolution. The
Tribune of Lahore has already criticised it and I believe Hindu opinion will generally be opposed
to it. However it should not act as an opiate as far as Muslims are concerned. We must carry the
work of organisation more vigorously than ever and should not rest till Muslim Governments are
established in the five provinces and reforms are granted to Baluchistan.
The rumour is that part of the Unionist Party does not mean to sign the League creed. So far Sir
Sikandar and his party have not signed it and I heard this morning that they would wait till the
next sessions of the League. The idea as one of themselves told me, is to slacken the activities of
the Provincial League. However I shall place you in possession of all the facts in a few days
time and then ask your opinion as to how we should proceed. I do hope that before the Lahore
Session you would be able to tour in the Punjab for at least two weeks.
Yours sincerely,
(Sd.) Mohammad Iqbal

Bar-at-Law
Urgent
1st November 1937
My dear Mr Jinnah,
Sir Sikandar Hayat Khan with some of the members of his party saw me yesterday and we had a
long talk about the differences between the League and the Unionist Party. Statements have been
issued to the press by both sides. Each side putting its own interpretation on the terms of JinnahSikandar agreement. This has caused much misunderstanding. As I wrote to you before, I will
put you in possession of all those statements in a few days time. For the present I request you to
kindly send me as early as possible a copy of the agreement which was signed by Sir Sikandar
and which I am told is in your possession. I further want to ask you whether you agreed to the
Provincial Parliamentary Board being controlled by the Unionist Party. Sir Sikandar tells me that
you agreed to this and therefore he claims that the Unionist Party must have their majority in the
Board. This as far as I know does not appear in the Jinnah-Sikandar agreement.
Please reply to this letter as early as possible. Our men are touring in the country and forming
Leagues in various places. Last night we had a very successful meeting in Lahore. Others will
follow.
Yours sincerely,
(Sd.) Mohammad Iqbal
Bar-at-Law
Strictly Private & Confidential
10th Nov., 1937
My Dear Mr. Jinnah,
After having several talks with Sir Sikandar and his friends I am now definitely of the opinion
that Sir Sikandar wants nothing less than the complete control of the League and the Provincial
Parliamentary Board. In your pact with him it is mentioned that the Parliamentary Board will be
reconstituted and that the Unionists will have majority in the Board. Sir Sikandar tells me that
you agreed to their majority in the Board. I wrote to you some time ago to enquire whether you
did agree to the unionist Majority in the Board. So far I have not heard from you. I personally see
no harm in giving him the majority that he wants but he goes beyond the pact when he wants a

complete change in the office holders of the League, especially the Secretary who has done so
much for the League. He also wishes that the finances of the League should be controlled by his
men. All this to my mind amounts to capturing of the League and then killing it. Knowing the
opinion of the province as I do I cannot take the responsibility of handing over the League to Sir
Sikandar and his friends. The pact has already damaged the prestige of the League in this
province; and the tactics of the Unionists may damage it still further. They have not so far signed
the creed of the League and I understand do not mean to. The session of the League in Lahore
they want in April instead of February. My impression is, that they want to gain time for their
own Zamindara League to function in the province. Perhaps you know that on his return from
Lucknow Sir Sikandar constituted a Zamindara League whose branches are now being made in
the province. In these circumstances please let me know what we should do. Kindly wire your
view if possible. If this is not possible write a detailed letter as early as possible.
Yours sincerely,
(Sd.) Mohammad, Iqbal
Bar-at-Law
__,_._,___
Be a Fan

Foreword, Letters of Iqbal to Jinnah

March 1943
He worked alone, with no personal staff and not even a secretary to copy his letters and keep his
papers tidy. But there was one bundle of letters, in a drawer, to which he could turn for
consolation: they had been written to him by Sir Muhammad Iqbal... (Hector Bolitho, 1954,
Jinnah, Creator of Pakistan, p.114. John Murray, London)
The letters which form the subject of this booklet were written to me by the sage, philosopher
and national poet of Islam, the late Dr. Sir Muhammad Iqbal, during the period May 1936 to
November1937, a few months before his death. This period synchronises with a very eventful
period in the history of Muslim Indiabetween the establishment of the All-India Muslim
League Central Parliamentary Board in June 1936 and the great historic sessions at Lucknow in
October 1937.
If the Central Parliamentary Board with its Provincial Branches marked the first great attempt on
the part of the Muslim League to rally round the Muslim opinion to contest the approaching
elections, under the Government of India Act of 1935, for Provincial Legislature on the League
ticket, the Lucknow Session indicated the first stage in the reorganization of the Muslim League
on a popular basis and as the only authoritative and representative organisation of Muslim India.
Both these high objects were attained in great part owing to the invaluable support that I obtained
through the sincere efforts and patriotic and selfless activities of many friends like Sir
Muhammad Iqbal, amongst others. The League gained from strength to strength in this short
period. In each of the Provinces where League Parliamentary Board was established and the
League parties were constituted we carried away about 60 to 70 per cent of the seats that were
contested by the League candidates. Hundreds of District and Primary Leagues were established
in almost every Province from the farthest corner of Madras to the North- West Frontier
Province.
The League gave a staggering blow to the so-called Muslim Mass Contact Movement which was
started by the Congress to disrupt Muslim ranks and to overawe League into submission. The
League emerged triumphant in most of the by-elections and shattered the intrigues and
machinations of those who hoped to create the impression that the Muslim League Organisation
had no support of the Muslim people.
Within eighteen months before the Lucknow Session, the League had succeeded in organising
Muslims as one party with an advanced and progressive programme and had brought under its
influence even those provinces which for lack of time or preparation had not been sufficiently
benefited by the activities of League Parliamentary Boards. The Lucknow Session furnished an
unmistakable evidence of the popularity that League commanded among Muslims of all groups
and ranks.
It was a great achievement for Muslim League that its lead came to be acknowledged by both the
majority and minority Provinces. Sir Muhammad Iqbal played a very conspicuous part, though at
the time not revealed to public, in bringing about this consummation. He had his own doubts
about Sikandar-Jinnah Pact being carried out and he was anxious to see it translated into some

tangible results without delay so as to dispel popular misapprehension about it, but unfortunately
he has not lived to see that the Punjab has all round made a remarkable progress and now it is
beyond doubt that the Muslims stand solidly behind the Muslim League Organisation.
With this brief historical background in mind, the letters can be read with great interest. It is,
however, much to be regretted that my own replies to Iqbal are not available. During the period
under reference I worked alone unassisted by the benefit of a personal staff and so did not retain
duplicate copies of the numerous letters that I had to dispose of. I made enquiries from the
Trustees of Iqbal's estate at Lahore and was informed that my letters are not traceable. Hence I
had no alternative but to publish the letters without my replies as I think these letters are of very
great historical importance, particularly those which explain his views in clear and unambiguous
terms on the political future of Muslim India.
His views were substantially in consonance with my own and had finally led me to the same
conclusions as a result of careful examination and study of the constitutional problems facing
India, and found expression in due course in the united will of Muslim India as adumberated in
the Lahore resolution of the All-India Muslim League, popularly known as the "Pakistan
Resolution, passed on 23rd March, 1940.
27th March 1943
M. A. Jinnah