Bacarro vs. Pinatacan
Bacarro vs. Pinatacan
Bacarro vs. Pinatacan
22
0
_______________
1 Records, p. 2.
2 Records, pp. 10-11.
3 Records, p. 14.
4 Records, p. 20.
221
_______________
5 Report of City Fiscal Francisco X. Velez of Cagayan de Oro City; Records,
pp. 26-27.
6 Transcript of Stenographic Notes.
222
22
2
10
_______________
7 Folder of Exhibits.
8 Records, pp. 28-32
9 Records, p. 45.
10 Records, p. 84.
223
13
14
_______________
11 Records, p. 89.
12 Records, p. 110.
13 Records, pp. 112-115.
14 Rule 138, Sec. 2. Requirements for all applicants for admission to the bar.
Every applicant for admission as a member of the Bar must be a citizen of the
Philippines, at least twenty-one years of age of good moral character, and a
resident of the Philippines; and must produce before the Supreme Court
satisfactory evidence of good moral character and that no charges against him,
involving moral turpitude, have been filed or are pending in any court in the
Philippines.
224
22
4
16
17
_______________
15 Martin, Ruperto G., Legal & Judicial Ethics, 5th ed., p. 15, citing In Re
Parazo, 82 Phil. 230.
16 Blanza vs. Arcangel, 21 SCRA 1, 4.
17 Martin, supra, p. 36.
18 Adm. Cases Nos. 528-SBC and 529-SBC, Feb. 25, 1982.
225
20
_______________
19 Affidavit of Respondent Ruben M. Pinatacan dated October 18, 1979;
Records, p. 114.
20 Adm. Case No. 545-SBC, December 26, 1974, 61 SCRA 484, 488.
226
22
6
Senseng vs. Ga
Respondent allowed to take the lawyers oath.
Notes.An unmarried attorney, 28 years of age, who had