Chapter 14 - Answer
Chapter 14 - Answer
Chapter 14 - Answer
CHAPTER 14
RESPONSIBILITY ACCOUNTING AND
TRANSFER PRICING
I.
Questions
1. Cost centers are evaluated by means of performance reports. Profit
centers are evaluated by means of contribution income statements
(including cost center performance reports), in terms of meeting sales and
cost objectives. Investment centers are evaluated by means of the rate of
return which they are able to generate on invested assets.
2. Overall profitability can be improved (1) by increasing sales, (2) by
reducing expenses, or (3) by reducing assets.
3. ROI may lead to dysfunctional decisions in that divisional managers may
reject otherwise profitable investment opportunities simply because they
would reduce the divisions overall ROI figure. The residual income
approach overcomes this problem by establishing a minimum rate of
return which the company wants to earn on its operating assets, thereby
motivating the manager to accept all investment opportunities promising a
return in excess of this minimum figure.
4. A cost center manager has control over cost, but not revenue or investment
funds. A profit center manager, by contrast, has control over both cost
and revenue. An investment center manager has control over cost and
revenue and investment funds.
5. The term transfer price means the price charged for a transfer of goods or
services between units of the same organization, such as two departments
or divisions. Transfer prices are needed for performance evaluation
purposes.
6. The use of market price for transfer purposes will create the actual
conditions under which the transferring and receiving units would be
operating if they were completely separate, autonomous companies. It is
generally felt that the creation of such conditions provides managerial
incentive, and leads to greater overall efficiency in operations.
7. Negotiated transfer prices should be used (1) when the volume involved is
large enough to justify quantity discounts, (2) when selling and/or
administrative expenses are less on intracompany sales, (3) when idle
14-1
capacity exists, and (4) when no clear-cut market price exists (such as a
sister division being the only supplier of a good or service).
8. Suboptimization can result if transfer prices are set in a way that benefits
a particular division, but works to the disadvantage of the company as a
whole. An example would be a transfer between divisions when no
transfers should be made (e.g., where a better overall contribution margin
could be generated by selling at an intermediate stage, rather than
transferring to the next division). Suboptimization can also result if
transfer pricing is so inflexible that one division buys from the outside
when there is substantial idle capacity to produce the item internally. If
divisional managers are given full autonomy in setting, accepting, and
rejecting transfer prices, then either of these situations can be created,
through selfishness, desire to look good, pettiness, or bickering.
II. Exercises
Exercise 1 (Evaluation of a Profit Center)
No. Although Department 3 does not cover all of the cost allocated to it. It
contributes P21,000 to the total operations over and above its direct costs.
Without Department 3, the company would earn P21,000 less as compared
with the original over-all income of P47,000.
Revenue
Direct cost of department
Contribution of the
department
Allocated cost
Net income
Department
1
2
4
Total
P132,000 P168,000 P98,000 P398,000
82,000
108,000
61,000
251,000
P 50,000
P 60,000
P37,000 P147,000
121,000
P 26,000
With the discontinuance of Department 3, the revenue and direct cost of the
department are eliminated, but there is no reduction in the total allocated cost.
Exercise 2 (Evaluation of an Investment Center)
Requirement 1
ROI
P400,000
Operating assets
14-2
RI
P400,000
Operating income
ROI (P100,000 P400,000)
Minimum required income
(16% x P400,000)
RI (P100,000 - P64,000)
P100,000
25%
P100,000
P64,000
P36,000
Requirement 2
The manager of the Cling Division would not accept this project under the
ROI approach since the division is already earning 25%. Accepting this
project would reduce the present divisional performance, as shown below:
Operating assets
Operating income
ROI
Present
P400,000
P100,000
25%
New Project
P60,000
P12,000*
20%
Overall
P460,000
P112,000
24.35%
Present
P400,000
P100,000
New Project
P60,000
P12,000
Overall
P460,000
P112,000
64,000
P 36,000
9,600*
P 2,400
73,600
P 38,400
Division X
Division Y
Division Z
P10,000
P12,600
P 28,800
= 25%
= 18%
= 16%
P40,000
P70,000
P180,000
14-3
Requirement 2
Division X would reject this investment opportunity since the addition would
lower the present divisional ROI. Divisions Y and Z would accept it because
they would look better in terms of their divisional ROI.
Exercise 4 (ROI, RI, Comparisons of Two Divisions)
Requirement 1
Net Operating income X
Sales
Division A :
Division B :
Sales
Average Operating Assets
P630,000
P9,000,000 X P9,000,000
P3,000,000
X
7%
3
P1,800,000 X
P20,000,000
X
9%
= ROI
= ROI
= 21%
P20,000,000
P10,000,000 = ROI
2
= 18%
Requirement 2
Average operating assets (a)..........
Net operating income....................
Minimum required return on average
operating assets - 16% x (a).....
Residual income............................
Division A
P3,000,000
P 630,000
Division B
P10,000,000
P 1,800,000
480,000
P 150,000
1,600,000
200,000
Requirement 3
No, Division B is simply larger than Division A and for this reason one would
expect that it would have a greater amount of residual income. As stated in
the text, residual income cant be used to compare the performance of
divisions of different sizes. Larger divisions will almost always look better,
not necessarily because of better management but because of the larger peso
figures involved. In fact, in the case above, Division B does not appear to be
as well managed as Division A. Note from Part (2) that Division B has only
an 18 percent ROI as compared to 21 percent for Division A.
14-4
P300,000
P6,000,000
P6,000,000
P1,500,000
= 5% x 4 = 20%
P900,000
P10,000,000
P10,000,000
P5,000,000
= 9% x 2 = 18%
Division B:
ROI
14-5
Division C:
ROI
P180,000
P8,000,000
P8,000,000
P2,000,000
= 2.25% x 4 = 9%
Requirement 2
Average operating assets
Required rate of return
Required operating income
Actual operating income
Required operating income (above)
Residual income
Division A
P1,500,000
15%
P 225,000
P 300,000
225,000
P 75,000
Division B
P5,000,000
18%
P 900,000
P 900,000
900,000
P
0
Division C
P2,000,000
12%
P 240,000
P 180,000
240,000
P (60,000)
Division A
20%
Division B
18%
Division C
9%
Reject
Reject
Accept
15%
18%
12%
Accept
Reject
Accept
Requirement 3
a. and b.
Return on investment (ROI)
Therefore, if the division is
presented with an investment
opportunity yielding 17%, it
probably would
Minimum required return for
computing residual income
Therefore, if the division is
presented with an investment
opportunity yielding 17%, it
probably would
rates of return of 15% and 12%, respectively, and would therefore add to the
total amount of their residual income. Division B would reject the
opportunity, since the 17% return on the new investment is less than Bs 18%
required rate of return.
Exercise 7 (Transfer Pricing from Viewpoint of the Entire Company)
Requirement 1
Sales
Less expenses:
Added by the division
Transfer price paid
Total expenses
Net operating income
1
2
3
Division A
P3,500,000
2,600,000
2,600,000
P 900,000
Division B
P2,400,000
1,200,000
700,000
1,900,000
P 500,000
Total Company
P5,200,000
3,800,000
3,800,000
P1,400,000
P28 + P20
= P48
The buying division, Division Y, can purchase a similar unit from an outside
supplier for P47. Therefore, Division Y would be unwilling to pay more than
P47 per unit.
Transfer price Cost of buying from outside supplier = P47
The requirements of the two divisions are incompatible and no transfer will
take place.
Requirement 2
In this case, Division X has enough idle capacity to satisfy Division Ys
demand. Therefore, there are no lost sales and the lowest acceptable price as
far as the selling division is concerned is the variable cost of P20 per unit.
Transfer price
P20 +
P0
20,000
P20
The buying division, Division Y, can purchase a similar unit from an outside
supplier for P34. Therefore, Division Y would be unwilling to pay more than
P34 per unit.
Transfer price Cost of buying from outside supplier = P34
In this case, the requirements of the two divisions are compatible and a
transfer will hopefully take place at a transfer price within the range:
P20 Transfer price P34
Exercise 9 (Transfer Pricing: Decision Making)
Requirement 1
Division As purchase decision from the overall firm perspective:
14-8
The additional savings in Division B means that now Division A should buy
outside.
Requirement 3
Assuming the outside price drops from P150 to P130:
Purchase costs from outside
Less: Savings in variable costs
Net Cost (Benefit) for A to buy outside
Sales
Less: Variable Costs
Contribution Margin
Less: Controllable fixed
expenses
Contribution to the recovery
of non-controllable fixed
expenses
Total
P5,100,000
3,330,000
P1,770,000
Product S
P2,700,000
1,890,000
P 810,000
Product T
P2,400,000
1,440,000
P 960,000
501,000
66,000
435,000
P1,269,000
P 744,000
P 525,000
Requirement (b)
The complaint of the manager of Product T is justified on the ground that his
product line shows a positive contribution margin and therefore, contributes to
the recovery of non-controllable fixed expenses. This observation is, of
course, made under the assumption that the preceding years figures (which
are not given) were less favorable than the current year.
Problem 2 (Evaluation of Profit Centers)
Requirement 1
Incremental sales
Less: Incremental costs
Net income
A
P71,000
42,000
P29,000
Product
B
P46,000
15,000
P31,000
C
P117,000
96,000
P 21,000
P 6,400
4,600
P11,000
Requirement 3
Opportunity cost of selling Product B is
From Product A
14-10
P29,000
From Product C
Total
21,000
P50,000
4,000
4,200
Budget
Based on
4,200
Hours
Variance
U (F)
P 3,600
7,400
5,300
P16,300
P 3,360
7,560
5,040
P15,960
P240
(160)
260
P340
P 1,600
2,200
6,000
5,400
1,200
P16,400
P32,700
P 1,600
2,200
6,000
5,400
1,200
P16,400
P32,360
Actual
4,200
Hours
Cost-Volume
Formula
Variable Overhead Costs:
Utilities
P0.80 per hour
Supplies
1.80
Indirect labor
1.20
Total
P3.80
Fixed Overhead Costs:
Utilities
Supplies
Depreciation
Indirect labor
Insurance
Total
Total Factory Overhead Costs
Controllable costs:
Direct material
Direct labor
Supplies
Maintenance
Total
Actual
Cost
Flexible
Budget Cost
Variance
(U) or (F)
P24,000
48,000
4,000
3,000
P79,000
P20,000
50,000
6,000
4,000
P80,000
P4,000 (U)
2,000 (F)
2,000 (F)
1,000 (F)
P1,000 (F)
14-11
P340
The cost of raw materials rose significantly, possibly because of (1) deficient
machinery due to the cutback in maintenance expenditures and/or (2) to the
lower labor cost, possibly due to the use of less-skilled workers. Supplies
decreased, indicating possible inadequacies for next periods production run.
Requirement 2
Performance Report for the Vice President
Actual
Cost
Controllable costs:
Marketing division
Production division
Personnel division
Other costs
Total
P104,000
79,000
72,000
68,800
P323,800
Flexible
Budget Cost
Variance
(U) or (F)
P102,000
80,000
76,000
70,000
P328,000
P2,000 (U)
1,000 (F)
4,000 (F)
1,200 (F)
P4,200 (F)
The marketing division is behind its cost allotment. The personnel division
came in somewhat under its budgeted costs. Perhaps there has been a cutback
in hiring, indicating possible reduction in future production.
Problem 5 (Target Sales Price; Return on Investment)
Requirement 1
Return on investment = Operating income / Investment
20% = X / P800,000
Target Operating Income = P160,000
Target revenues, calculated as follows:
Fixed overhead
Variable costs
Desired operating income
Revenues
1,500,000 x P300
P200,000
450,000
160,000
P810,000
Requirement 2
Data are in thousands.
Units
Revenues
1,500
P810
2,000
P1,080
1,000
P540
450
200
650
600
200
800
300
200
500
P160
20%
= P160 / P800
P280
35%
= P280 / P800
P 40
5%
= P40 / P800
Variable costs
Fixed costs
Total costs
Operating income
Return on investment
Note how the change in income follows the change in revenues, as predicted
by operating leverage. Operating leverage multiplied times the percentage
change in sales gives the percentage change in income. Thus, the greater the
operating leverage ratio, the larger the effect on income and ROI of a given
percentage change in sales. This exercise provides an opportunity to review
the relationship between volume and profit. See the illustration below:
Operating leverage = contribution margin / operating income
= (P810 P450) / P160 = 2.25
% change in income =
=
% change in income
If volume goes to 2,000 units: (P280 P160) / P160 = 75%
If volume goes to 1,000 units: (P160 P40) / P160 = 75%
% change in ROI
If volume goes to 2,000 units: (35% - 20%) / 20% = 75%
If volume goes to 1,000 units: (20% - 5%) / 20% = 75%
14-13
Sales
Average operating assets
Pasig:
P630,000
P9,000,000
P9,000,000
P3,000,000
= 7% x 3 = 21%
Quezon:
P1,800,000
P20,000,000
P20,000,000
P10,000,000
= 9% x 2 = 18%
Requirement 2
Average operating assets (a)
Net operating income
Minimum required return on average
operating assets16% (a)
Residual income
Pasig
P3,000,000
P 630,000
Quezon
P10,000,000
P1,800,000
480,000
P 150,000
P 1,600,000
P 200,000
Requirement 3
No, the Quezon Division is simply larger than the Pasig Division and for this
reason one would expect that it would have a greater amount of residual
income. Residual income cant be used to compare the performance of
divisions of different sizes. Larger divisions will almost always look better,
not necessarily because of better management but because of the larger peso
figures involved. In fact, in the case above, Quezon does not appear to be as
well managed as Pasig. Note from Part (1) that Quezon has only an 18% ROI
as compared to 21% for Pasig.
14-14
Transfer price
Variable cost
+
per unit
Transfer price
P16 +
P16
The Pump Division would be unwilling to pay more than P29, the price it is
currently paying an outside supplier for its valves. Therefore, the transfer
price must fall within the range:
P16 Transfer price P29
Requirement 2
Since the Valve Division is selling all of the valves that it can produce on the
outside market, it would have to give up some of these outside sales to take on
the Pump Divisions business. Thus, the Valve Division has an opportunity
cost, which is the total contribution margin on lost sales:
Transfer price
Variable cost
+
per unit
Transfer price
P16 +
P16 + P14
P30
Since the Pump Division can purchase valves from an outside supplier at only
P29 per unit, no transfers will be made between the two divisions.
14-15
Requirement 3
Applying the formula for the lowest acceptable price from the viewpoint of the
selling division, we get:
Transfer price
Variable cost
+
per unit
Transfer price
(P16 P3) +
P13 + P14
P27
In this case, the transfer price must fall within the range:
P27 Transfer price P29
Problem 8 (Transfer Pricing)
To produce the 20,000 special valves, the Valve Division will have to give up
sales of 30,000 regular valves to outside customers. Applying the formula for
the lowest acceptable price from the viewpoint of the selling division, we get:
Transfer price
Variable cost
+
per unit
Transfer price
P20 +
P20 + P21
14-16
P41
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
C
D
A
A
C
A
D
A
C
A
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
E
D
C
C
B
C
B
A
B
A
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
14-17
C
B
A
D
B
A
A
B
D
A
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
B
D
D
D
C
D
B
D
B
D