2 2 1
2 2 1
2 2 1
1 (**)
Conclusion Questions
5. Many athletes and administrators fear the widespread use of gene doping
the use of gene therapy to modify genes that improve athletic performance.
Describe at least two genetic modifications that would improve the
performance of an athlete. Make sure to mention the body system(s) affected
as well as the specific goal of the therapy.
One genetic modification is introducing an additional erythropoietin (EPO)
gene to the human genome. This modification would raise the red blood cell
count in the body, allowing for more oxygen and increasing endurance. It
affects the circulatory system primarily. Cyclists also have been known to
dope with synthetic EPO. Another genetic modification is insertion of the
insulinlike growth factor-1 (IGF-1 gene). IGF-1 produces a growth factor that
repairs muscles and supports muscles growth, making the doper stronger. It
affects primarily the muscular system, but also the skeletal system. It has
long been banned from being used as a PED.
Nasr, Susan L. (2008, December 3). How Gene Doping Works. Retrieved on
December 14, 2015 from http://science.howstuffworks.com/life/genetic/genedoping.htm
6. Do you believe gene doping should be considered cheating? Why or why
not?
Gene doping is cheating because it gives an unfair advantage to those who
are able to afford gene doping. Sporting does not become a test of ones own
ability and hard work, but about money and those who can pay for gene
doping. Gene doping is like taking steroids to enhance performance, and
steroids are banned.
7. Why do you think testing for gene doping would be extremely difficult?
Testing for gene doping would be extremely difficult because whatever
performance enhancing substances made from genes is produced by your
own body, so it seems completely natural. To test for the gene would require
a biopsy, which no athlete would let you do. Also, if there were some kind of
test, it might negatively hurt those who were born with a naturally mutated
enhancing gene.
Space Doctor
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/04/us/trials-are-halted-on-a-genetherapy.html
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Story?id=3421869&page=1
Gene Therapy Debate Notes
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/17/us/2nd-cancer-is-attributed-to-geneused-in-fda-test.html
2nd Cancer Is Attributed To Gene Used in French Test
Gene therapy patient in France has leukemia-like disease
gene put into cell caused a cancer-causing gene to be switched on
The second therapeutic gene for growth of lymphocytes activated the
oncogene
If this hypothesis is confirmed, it would indicate that gene therapy
treatments in which the inserted gene is not a growth-promoting one
would not face the same risk, he said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/04/us/trials-are-halted-on-a-genetherapy.html
trying to cure SCID
contracted leukemia like disease
In US and France
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Story?id=3421869&page=1
treatment for active inflammatory arthritis - death
not sure if gene therapy was the cause of death, but its very likely
Others:
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?
sec=health&res=9E06EED8173EF93AA1575AC0A96F958260
Jesse Gelsinger- Deceased
rare form
vital signs decreased after two days and was taken off life
support
http://www.foxnews.com/story/2007/12/18/boy-living-in-bubble-developsleukemia-from-experimental-therapy.html
3 year old boy
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-25687002
Gene Doping
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/17/us/2nd-cancer-is-attributed-to-geneused-in-fda-test.html
2nd Cancer Is Attributed To Gene Used in French Test
Gene therapy patient in France has leukemia-like disease
gene put into cell caused a cancer-causing gene to be switched on
The second therapeutic gene for growth of lymphocytes activated the
oncogene
study discovered that there is a possibility that it could be a onetime treatment that reduces the viral load and does not hurt the
immune system
first study shows patients with modified cells could better sapress HIV
replication compared to constant antiretrovirus treatments
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2124-gene-therapy-cures-bubble-boy
x linked
children with this disease must be kept in isolation, usually die young
How?
The possibility comes from the possible regrowth of hair cells in the ear
this test used adenoviruses and inserted the Atoh1 gene into the
cochlea
Stem cells
o
embryonic cells were also used for the regrowth of hair cells
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-12/sumc-gtf122205.php (Links
to an external site.)
-The gene gets inserted into the cells own DNA (makes a
permanent correction)
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/2008-04-28-3714044875_x.htm (
plasmids - larger, but not good at getting into cells, dont usually
trigger immune response
packaged inside liposomes
virosomes - liposomes with viral surface proteins combines
plasmid and viral advantages
Ex vivo vs. In vivo
in vivo: directly inject vector
ex vivo: deliver genes to culture, then put cells in patient
less likely to trigger an immune response
alternative to bone marrow transplants
bone marrow transplants (stem cells) from donors used to treat
genetic disorders
ADA deficiency
SCID
sickle cell disease
TALENs (Transcription activator-like effector nucleases)
includes TAL effector DNA-binding domain and cleavage domain
TAL effector protein from bacteria show correlation between
amino acids and nucleotide recog
similar to zinc finger nuclease
have been used in vitro for sickle cell and another stuff
easier and cheaper than zinc
danger: off-target cuts, bulky unknown immunogenicity,
uncertain binding specificity
CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/cas
9)
immune system for prokaryotes: short repeated sequences
followed by spacer from foreign plasmids (memory)
applications: can edit 5 genes at a time, can methylate genes to
turn off, turn genes to turn on, bacterial strain identification/isolation
comparing spacers
affordable, easy to engineer, easier to deliver to cells
might make off-target cuts
Vectors
Vectors
Retrovirus
Adenovirus
Genetic
Material
Max base pairs
Advantages
RNA
2x-strand
DNA
7.5k bp
Infects
dividing and
non-dividing
cells
Can be
specific
Disadvantages
Infects only
dividing cells
RNA must be
converted to
DNA
May disrupt
other
8k bp
Can target
specific cells
Integrates into
genome
Does not
integrate
May trigger
immune
response
AdenoAssociated
Virus
Single-strand
DNA
5k bp
Infects
dividing and
non-dividing
Can be
specific
Integrates
usually on
chromosome
19 (less
chance of
disruption)
Does not
cause immune
response
(usu.)
Small
Herpes
Simplex Virus
Liposomes
Naked DNA
2x-strand DNA
2x-strand DNA
20k bp
Large
Does not
integrate, but
is replicated
with the cell
Does not
disrupt any
genes
No max
Infinitely-sized
gene
No immune
response
Plasmid (it is
one)
No max
Infinitely-sized
gene
No immune
response
Only infects
nerve cells
May trigger
immune
response
May be
poisonous
Does not
integrate
Not good at
entering cells
May be toxic
Very
ineffective at
entering cells
Difficult to
make
functioning
genes
May trigger
immune
response
Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome
in white blood cells, the signalling causes the actin skeleton to create
the immune synapse between the foreign invader and lymphocyte
hematopoietic stem cells: stem cells that can produce any type
of blood cell
used retroviruses and lentiviruses ex vivo (lv has less risk for leukemia)
Rettner, Rachael. (2013, July 11). 6 Children with Rare Disorders Helped by
Gene Therapy. Retrieved on December 14, 2015 from
http://www.livescience.com/38118-gene-therapy-rare-disorders.html
Bosticardo, M, Ferrua, F., Cavazzana, M., Aitui, A. (2014). Gene Therapy for
Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome. Current Gene Therapy, 14(6), 413-421. Retrieved
on December 14, 2015 from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25245089