Incest and Innocence: Janey's Youth in Kathy Acker's Blood and Guts in High School - Kathy Hughes
Incest and Innocence: Janey's Youth in Kathy Acker's Blood and Guts in High School - Kathy Hughes
Incest and Innocence: Janey's Youth in Kathy Acker's Blood and Guts in High School - Kathy Hughes
1, April 2006
Kathy Acker is known for her feminist postmodernism; her dismantling of language; and
her overturning of the mores of dominant society to expose the fascism of the capitalist system
and of white males in general. Michael Clune writes that Ackers treatment of the incest taboo
and her celebration of masochism, show her transgressive machine in action, cutting away the
malignant apparatus of sovereignty (495). While the masochism in Ackers work has been
written about extensively by Clune, Karen Brennan, and Catherine Rock among others, Ackers
choice to make Janey a child of ten in her 1978 novel Blood and Guts in High School
(hereinafter referred to as BGHS), has only been examined in full by Gabrielle Dane. How does
Janeys age contribute to the punk aesthetic Acker is known for? How does Janeys youth drive
home the message of patriarchal injustice Acker is trying to communicate? How does Ackers
choice to make Janey so young affect the language of Ackers work? Critics have not directly
answered these questions, but I believe that in her decision to make Janey a child, Acker has two
goals in mind: One, the juxtaposition of the innocence of childhood with a taboo (sex) to create,
as Catherine Rock and Rod Phillips write, a challenging aesthetic, an irony as morbidly
humorous as it is heartbreaking; two, as Clune and Dane allude, to reinforce and underscore her
message of injustice toward women in patriarchal society.
Rod Phillips, speaking of Ackers plagiarism of Hawthornes The Scarlet Letter in
BGHS, quotes Larry McCaffery, who writes that a modus operandi of punk aesthetics is
122
This disturbing juxtaposition of Janeys childish behavior in the same paragraph as her sexual
behavior is an example of what Catherine Rock describes as Ackers intermix[ing] of the sacred
and the profane and her coupling of the debased and the delicate (208). The innocent, loving
request of a little girl who asks to sleep in her parents bed for security and snuggling takes on a
whole new meaning with Janey and is an example of this debasement that Rock speaks of.
Before her father leaves for his date with Sally, the starlet hes seeing, he behaves like a loving
father: he promises Janey hell wake her up when he comes home; calls her sweetie; and says
yes when she asks if she can crawl into bed and sleep with him (Acker 12). By now the
reader knows that this ten- year- old girl will not get the comfort she needs, and when Johnny
comes home at seven in the morning, she runs away from his sexual advances. However,
wanting to please her daddy/lover, and prevent him from leaving her, she crawls into bed with
him and performs fellatio. This whole scene would be heartbreaking if it was an adult woman
trying desperately to hold on to her philandering lover. The age of the protagonist, and her
relationship to the man who is hurting her, beats the reader over the head with the pain and the
juxtaposition (the mingling of the debased and the delicate as Rock would say) between
Janeys behavior and her age.
Janeys age serves as an ironic device, especially when seen through the lens of Freudian
interpretation. Susan E. Hawkins writes that
Janey, as an incest victim, blames herself for her fathers indifference and thus cant
handle Johnnys romantic interest in the starlet. Conversely, Johnnys attachment to
Janey and his need to free himself of it sound absurdly like the emotional struggles
123
Johnny tells Janey that Youve completely dominated my life for the last nine years
and I no longer know whos you and whos me (12). Johnnys friend Bill (who also sexually
abused Janey, but his cock was too big (10)) tells Janey that she has dominated his life since
your mother died and now he hates you. He has to hate you because he has to reject you. He has
to find out who he is (11). The irony of these statements, which Susan Hawkins alludes to, is
centered on their Freudian implications. Karen Brennan writes that Bills psychoanalysis
refigures the family roles by casting Janey as the overbearing mother and her father as the
daughter/son on the threshold of the Oedipal stage. The father-daughter relationship, for Bill, is
really a son-mother relationship and turns the Freudian theory upside-down and inside-out
(258). Brennans use of Freudian theory for analysis of the text is rendered more ironic by
Janeys age. The father resents his daughter, who is only a child, for holding him back and
smothering his identity the way the son resents the mother for the same reasons. Fatherly
responsibility, and Janeys dependence, do not matter to this man, as is made clear by his
resentment for an incestuous relationship that he started when his daughter was an infant. Later,
Janey tells Johnny that It was always me, my voice, I felt like a total nag; I want you to be the
man (12). Janey, a ten-year-old little girl, believes that she has usurped her fathers position as
the one with power in the relationship, a sign of her fathers emotional manipulation. Adding to
the irony of Bills psychoanalysis is his remark that Theres always been a strong connection
between the two of you. Youve been together for years (16). This bizarre connection is also
commented on by Janey, who tells Johnny, When I first met you, its as if a light turned on for
me. Youre the first joy I knew (9). With this remark, Acker turns the natural infatuation a very
young girl has for her father, as well as Freuds Electra complex, inside out through sarcasm.
It is the misogynist dynamics of the patriarchal family (the type that Freud was primarily
concerned with) that Acker is attacking with this irony, according to Karen Brennan. By ignoring
the traditional family rolesby making the daughter into the controlling mother/wife and the
father the hen-pecked son/husbandAcker is rendering the family unit extremely unstable, the
consequences of which spread out into society (Brennan 258-259). It is this patriarchal,
capitalistic society that Acker sees as promoting injustice toward women. Using Brennans
124
125
Through this clear, unpoetic, and ugly language, Acker reveals the horror of Janeys
victimization and the victimization of all women:
That night, for the first time in months, Janey and her father sleep together
because Janey cant get to sleep otherwise. Her fathers touch is cold, he doesnt
want to touch her mostly cause hes confused. Janey fucks him even though it
hurts her like hell cause of her Pelvic Inflammatory Disease. (Acker 9-10)
Johnny returned home (what is home?) and told Janey he had been drinking with
SallyShe [Janey] lay down on the filthy floor by his bed, but it was very
uncomfortable: she hadnt slept for two nights. So she asked him if he wanted to
come into her bed.
The plants in her room cast strange, beautiful shadows over the other shadows. It
was a clean, dreamlike room. He fucked her in her asshole cause the infection
made her cunt hurt too much to fuck there, though she didnt tell him it hurt badly
there, too, cause she wanted to fuck love more than she felt pain (21).
Millietti demonstrates Ackers visceral language by comparing a passage from Empire of the
Senseless (which also has a victim of pedophilic incest for a protagonist) to Vladimir Nabokovs
Lolita. The contrast between the styles of the two authors underscores the significance of the
straight forward, visceral language, a language untamed by the mores of society, in Ackers work
(Millietti 8-9). While Nabokov uses the beauty of poetic, intellectual language (the language of
126
127
Mr. Fuckface: You see, we own the language. Language must be used clearly and
precisely to reveal our universe.
Mr. Blowjob: Those rebels are never clear. What they say doesnt make sense.
Mr. Fuckface: It even goes against all the religions to tamper with the sacred
languages.
Mr. Blowjob: Without language the only people the rebels can kill are themselves
(136).
Dane sees this dialogue as an accurate description of the position of women and minorities in
capitalistic society. Language molds perception, and those that control the languagewhat is
said and what is not said; and how something is saidcan control the minds of their society. In a
culture in love with the binaries of male/female and mind/body, patriarchal societies have a
male-centric language. Marjorie Worthington writes that Western societies typically equate the
male with the mind, rationality, and speech, and the female with the body and with irrationality
(The Territory Named Womens Bodies 391), and Acker turns these binaries against the
system that uses them in BGHS by turning the language of the patriarchy inside out, using it in a
feminine, pre-rational fashion. Janey, as a female child, is the best mouthpiece for this counterlanguage.
It is my belief that while Ackers work could have made as much an impact on the reader
with the protagonist being of age, but her choice of a child as the heroine increases the visceral
intensity of her words and corresponds with her use of experimental language and technique to
128
Works Cited.
Acker, Kathy. Blood and Guts in High School. Grove P, NY: 1978.
Brennan, Karen. The Geography of Enunciation: Hysterical Pastiche in Kathy Ackers Fiction.
Boundary 2, 21.2 (1994): 243-268.
Clune, Michael. Blood Money: Sovereignty and Exchange in Kathy Acker. Contemporary
Literature, 45.3 (2004): 486-515.
Dane, Gabrielle. Hysteria as a Feminist Protest: Dora, Cixous, and Acker. Womens Studies,
Vol. 23 (1994): 231-256.
Hawkins, Susan E. All in the Family: Kathy Ackers Blood and Guts in High School.
Contemporary Literature, 45.4 (2004): 637-658.
Hume, Kathryn. Voice in Kathy Ackers Fiction. Contemporary Literature, 42. 3 (2001): 485513.
Milletti, Christina. Violent Acts, Volatile Words: Kathy Ackers Terrorist Aesthetic. Studies
in the Novel, 36.3 (2004). 352-372.
Phillips, Rod. Purloined Letters: The Scarlet Letter in Kathy Ackers Blood and Guts in High
School. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 35.3 (1994): 173-180.
Rock, Catherine. Poetics of the Periphery: Literary Experimentalism in Kathy Ackers In
Memoriam to Identity. Literature Interpretation Theory, 12 (2001): 205-233.
Worthington, Marjorie. Posthumous Posturing: the Subversive Power of Death in
Contemporary Womens Fiction. Studies in the Novel, 32.2 (2000): 243-264.
--- The Territory Named Womens Bodies: The Public and Pirate Spaces of Kathy Acker.
Literature Interpretation Theory, 15 (2004): 389-408.
129