Manalo Vs Sistoza

MANALO vs. SISTOZA [G.R. No. 107369.
August 11, 1999]

TOPIC: GOVERNMENT EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT POWERS AND FUNCTIONS OF THE
PRESIDENT POWER OF APPOINTMENT
Jesulito A. Manalo, petitioner, vs. Pedro G. Sistoza, Regino Aro III, Nicasio Ma. Custodio, Guillermo
Domondon, Raymundo L. Logan, Wilfredo R. Reotutar, Felino C. Pacheco, Jr., Ruben J. Cruz,
Geronimo B. Valderrama, Merardo G. Abaya, Everlino B. Nartatez, Enrique T. Bulan, Pedro J.
Navarro, Dominador M. Mangubat, Rodolfo M. Garcia and Honorable Salvador M. Enriquez II in His
Capacity as Secretary of Budget and Managements, respondents.
Ponente: Purisima, J.
Legal Action: Special civil action for prohibition questioning the constitutionality and legality of the
permanent appointments issued by former President Corazon Aquino to the respondent senior
officers of the Philippine National Police who were promoted to the ranks of Chief Superintendent
and Director without their appointments submitted to the Commission on Appointments for
confirmation under Article VII Section 16 of the 1987 Constitution and R.A. 6975 otherwise known
as the Local Government Code of 1990.
Facts:
On December 13, 1990, Republic Act 6975 creating the Department of Interior and Local
Government was signed into law by former President Corazon C. Aquino.
In accordance therewith, on March 10, 1992, the President of the Philippines, through then
Executive Secretary Franklin M. Drilon, promoted the fifteen (15) respondent police officers, by
appointing them to positions in the Philippine National Police with the rank of Chief Superintendent
to Director. The appointments of respondent police officers were in a permanent capacity.
Without their names submitted to the Commission on Appointments for confirmation, the said police
officers took their oath of office and assumed their respective positions. Thereafter, the Department
of Budget and Management, under the then Secretary Salvador M. Enriquez III, authorized
disbursements for their salaries and other emoluments.
On October 21, 1992, the petitioner brought before this Court this present original petition for
prohibition, as a taxpayer suit, to assail the legality of subject appointments and disbursements
made therefor.
Substantive issues:
Issue
Respondents
Held
W/N the subject

promotions
of
officers of the
PNP are valid
No, confirmation is
required under the
Constitution,
similar
to
Yes
Ratio
(1) Under Section 16, Article VII, of the
Constitution, there are four groups of
officers of the government to be
appointed by the President:
Basis
Art. VII Sec. 16
Sarmiento
III
vs.
Mison,
Bautista
vs.
without
the
confirmation of
the Commission
of Appointments
First, the heads of the executive

departments, ambassadors, other public
ministers and consuls, officers of the
armed forces from the rank of colonel or
naval captain, and other officers whose
appointments are vested in him in this
Constitution;
appointments
to
the AFP, as well as
under R.A. 6975
Salonga,
Quintos-Deles
vs.
Constitutional
Commission,
Calderon
vs.
Carale
Second, all other officers of the

Government whose appointments are
not otherwise provided for by law;
Third, those whom the President may be
authorized by law to appoint;
Fourth, officers lower in rank whose
appointments the Congress may by law
vest in the President alone.
Only
presidential
appointments
belonging to the first group require
the confirmation of the Commission
on Appointments.
(2) The Philippine National Police is
separate and distinct from the Armed
Forces of the Philippines.
W/N portions of
R.A. 6975 Sec.
26
and
31
requiring
confirmation of
appointments by
the Commission
on Appointments
are valid
No
Congress cannot by law expand the

power
of
confirmation
of
the
Commission on Appointments and
require confirmation of appointments of
other government officials not mentioned
in the first sentence of Section 16 of
Article VII of the 1987 Constitution.
Art. XVI Sec. 4,

Sec. 6; R.A.
6975 Sec. 2
Tarosa
Singson
vs.
DECISION: Petition DISMISSED for lack of merit; Sections 26 and 31 of Republic Act 6975 which
empower the Commission on Appointments to confirm the appointments of public officials whose
appointments are not required by the Constitution to be confirmed declared unconstitutional (14-0)
Notes:
R.A. 6975 Local Government Code of 1990
Sec. 26. Powers, Functions and Term of Office of the PNP Chief - The command and direction of the PNP
shall be vested in the Chief of the PNP who shall have the power to direct and control tactical as well as
strategic movements, deployment, placement, utilization of the PNP or any of its units and personal, including
its equipment, facilities and other resources. Such command and direction of the Chief of the PNP may be
delegated to subordinate officials with respect to the units under their respective commands, in accordance
with the rules and regulations prescribed by the Commission. The Chief of the PNP shall also have the power
to issue detailed implementing policies and instructions regarding personnel, funds, properties, records,
correspondence and such other matters as may be necessary to effectively carry out the functions, powers
and duties of the Bureau. The Chief of the PNP shall be appointed by the President from among the
senior officers down to the rank of the chief superintendent, subject to confirmation by the
Commission on Appointments: Provided, That the Chief of the PNP shall serve a term of office not to
exceed four (4) years: Provided, further, That in times of war or other national emergency declared by
Congress, the President may extend such term of office.
Sec.31. Appointment of PNP Officers and Members. - The appointment of the officers and members of the
PNP shall be effected in the following manner:
(a) Police Officer I to Senior Police Officer IV - Appointed by the PNP regional director for regional personnel
or by the Chief of the PNP for the national headquarters personnel and attested by the Civil Service
Commission;
(b) Inspector to Superintendent - Appointed by the Chief of the PNP, as recommended by their immediate
superiors, and attested by the Civil Service Commission;
(c) Senior Superintendent to Deputy Director General - Appointed by the President upon recommendation of
the Chief of the PNP, with the proper endorsement by the Chairman of the Civil Service Commission and
subject to confirmation by the Commission on Appointments; and
(d) Director General - Appointed by the President from among the senior officers down to the rank of chief
superintendent in the service, subject to confirmation by the Commission on Appointments; Provided,
That the Chief of the PNP shall serve a tour of duty not to exceed four (4) years; Provided, further, That, in
times of war or other national emergency declared by Congress, the President may extend such tour of duty.
Section 2. Declaration of policy - It is hereby declared to be the policy of the State to promote peace and
order, ensure public safety and further strengthen local government capability aimed towards the effective
delivery of the basic services to the citizenry through the establishment of a highly efficient and competent
police force that is national in scope and civilian in character. xxx
The police force shall be organized, trained and equipped primarily for the performance of police functions.
Its national scope and civilian character shall be paramount. No element of the police force shall be
military nor shall any position thereof be occupied by active members of the Armed Forces of the
Philippines.
1987 Constitution
Article VII Sec. 16 - The President shall nominate and, with the consent of the Commission on
Appointments, appoint the heads of the executive departments, ambassadors, other public ministers
and consuls, or officers of the armed forces from the rank of colonel or naval captain, and other
officers whose appointments are vested in him in this Constitution. He shall also appoint all other
officers of the Government whose appointments are not otherwise provided for by law, and those whom he
may be authorized by law to appoint. The Congress may, by law, vest the appointment of other officers lower
in rank in the President alone, in the courts, or in the heads of departments, agencies, commissions, or
boards.
The President shall have the power to make appointments during the recess of the Congress, whether
voluntary or compulsory, but such appointments shall be effective only until disapproval by the Commission
on Appointments or until the next adjournment of the Congress.
Article XVI Sec. 4 The Armed Forces of the Philippines shall be composed of a citizen armed force
which shall undergo military training and service, as may be provided by law. It shall keep a regular force
necessary for the security of the State.
Article XVI Sec. 6 - The State shall establish and maintain one police force, which shall be national in
scope and civilian in character to be administered and controlled by a national police commission. The
authority of local executives over the police units in their jurisdiction shall be provided by law.

Manalo Vs Sistoza

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Manalo Vs Sistoza

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Manalo Vs Sistoza

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MANALO vs. SISTOZA [G.R. No. 107369.

August 11, 1999]

W/N the subject

First, the heads of the executive

Second, all other officers of the

Congress cannot by law expand the

Art. XVI Sec. 4,

You might also like