71

WITNESS TESTING OF API 610 CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS

Nirmal "Nick" Ganatra

Rotating Equipment / Subsea Pump Engineer
FMC Technologies, Inc.
Houston, Texas, USA

R. C. Patel
Lead Pump Engineer
Bechtel Oil, Gas & Chemicals, Inc.
Houston, Texas, USA
INTRODUCTION

Nirmal "Nick" Ganatra is currently

Rotating Equipment / Subsea Pump
Engineer at FMC Technologies, Inc. He is
responsible for applications of subsea
boosting pumps in deep to ultra-deep water
developments. Prior to joining FMC, Mr.
Ganatra was Rotating Equipment Engineer
at Bechtel Oil, Gas & Chemicals, Inc.,
responsible for applications of centrifugal
and positive displacement pumps in refinery and LNG projects.
In the past, he worked as Design Engineer for Sulzer Pumps
Houston Inc. (formerly, Johnston Pump Company).
Mr. Ganatra received his M.S. (Mechanical Engineering)
from Texas A&M University and M.B.A. from The University of
Texas at Arlington. He is a registered professional engineer in
Texas.

R. C. Patel is currently Lead Pump

Engineer of Bechtel Oil, Gas & Chemicals,
Inc. He has over 40 years of experience in
designing and applications of centrifugal
pumps. Previously, he worked as Design
and Chief Engineer for Wilson-Snyder
Pumps, now part of Flowserve
Corporation.
Mr. Patel received his B.E. (Mech.)
from M.S. University of Baroda, India and M.S. (Mechanical
Engineering) from The University of Oklahoma. He is a
registered professional engineer in Oklahoma and Texas.

ABSTRACT
The tutorial outlines the basic concepts and offers some
tips on witness testing of API 610 centrifugal pumps and API
611 steam turbines. The section on API 610 pump testing
discusses performance, NPSH and mechanical run tests of API
610 centrifugal pumps that are often specified with witness
testing. Various parameters that are measured during testing
and the related instrumentation are introduced. This section
references related paragraphs and tables from ANSI/API
Standard 610 (2010). The section on API 611 steam turbine
testing covers the mechanical run test and cites the related
paragraphs of API Standard 611 (2008). The same section also
recommends a few additional tests that could be performed on
general purpose steam turbines, if feasible and applicable.

Many companies affiliated with the petroleum,

petrochemical and natural gas industries require at least some
machinery testing to be witnessed by quality inspectors and/or
engineers at the equipment vendors shop prior to release for
shipment. This ensures that the testing is being performed in
accordance with the contract requirements, applicable standards
and/or test procedures that have been reviewed and accepted in
advance of the test. Successful witnessing of these tests
requires prior understanding of the test setup, test conditions
and measured parameters.
THE RATIONALE OF WITNESS TESTING
The prime intent of witness testing is rarely just to see the
equipment operate when the start button is pushed. Witness
testing provides the opportunity for an engineer or quality
inspector witnessing the test (hereinafter, called the "witness")
to ensure that the equipment vendor carries out the factory
acceptance tests in accordance with the specifications and other
contract requirements. Many a time, the size and complexity of
the equipment may not be palpable through drawings and
documentation. Witness testing also provides the opportunity to
experience the "look and feel" of the actual equipment.
Furthermore, it provides the opportunity to identify and address
issues with non-conformance or misinterpretation of the
specifications with respect to equipment construction or testing.
The following is just an abridged list of such items:
Location/orientation of connections, equipment,
instrumentation and accessories
Instrumentation, controls and their tagging
Nameplates and equipment tagging
Scope of supply of equipment, instrumentation and
accessories
Documentation
Painting and coating requirements
The cost of correcting equipment non-conformance
significantly increases for both, the vendor and the purchaser,
once the equipment is shipped to the field. Hence, it is in the
best interests of both these parties to identify non-conformances
in the vendor's factory and ensure compliance with the contract
requirements before shipment.
It is important to note that factory acceptance testing is
generally performed prior to the final painting, assembly and
packaging of equipment. Hence, certain items that are listed
above may still not be evident during testing. However, if the
purchaser has multiple equipment orders with the same vendor,
then the witness can request to see the other equipment that has

Copyright 2011 by Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University

72

already passed testing and is being assembled and packaged for

final shipment. In the same manner, the witness can request to
look at the other items on order that are being manufactured at
that time. During the same trip for test witnessing, the witness
can request the vendor to give them a tour of the manufacturing
facility.
Witness testing is generally also specified if the purchaser
is uncertain about the vendors' abilities, experience and
performance. Moreover, for new equipment designs and for
prototype qualification testing, witness testing provides the
opportunity to ensure that the agreed test procedures are
unequivocally followed. Finally, witness testing may also be
required to ensure satisfactory operation with certain critical
constraints such as insufficient NPSH margin, high energy
density or high operating temperature.
When possible, the test to be witnessed should not be the
first one seen by the witness at that facility. It is recommended
that an apprentice type system be used experienced engineers
should recommend to management that they take along a new
engineer for each new type of test or facility.
Having stated the above, one cannot negate the fact that the
requirement of witness testing adds the burden of cost, time and
resources to the project. Hence, the decision to require witness
tests for certain equipment should be made prior to sending
requests for quotation with careful consideration to the size,
criticality and complexity of the equipment, in addition to the
purchaser's past experience with the vendor(s). The purchaser
should be mindful of the fact that once an order is placed, it
usually becomes hard to justify the addition of witness testing
at a later stage of the project.
Virtual Witnessing
Virtual witnessing is a fairly recent development that
allows an engineer or inspector to witness equipment testing
from the comfort of their work location. Measured parameters
and collected data can be displayed on the witness' computer in
real time during the testing. Generally, test performance curves
can also be constantly seen by the virtual witness on their
computer screen as the test progresses. In addition, multiple
cameras are often installed at the test site, thus enabling the
virtual witness to remotely monitor the actions and events at the
test site from their computer screen.
To enable such witnessing, the vendor provides the witness
with access to a secure internet location that has a dedicated
username and password. From there, the witness can launch a
secure application that is configured to enable such witnessing.
Although the significant benefits of virtual witnessing with
respect to cost, time and resources are obvious, it generally
limits the extent of witness' involvement in the testing.
Moreover, the witness' potential to uncover other problems with
equipment non-conformance is also fairly reduced. Virtual
witnessing typically limits itself in scope to the contract
performance tolerances and vibration limits for specific subsystems (e.g. hydraulics, bearing housing, shaft). On the other
hand, the witness' physical presence can ensure satisfactory
operation of the equipment as a complete unit, wherein
problems not explicitly spelt out in the test acceptance criteria
may also be uncovered. Hence, when possible, physical
witnessing of tests should be generally preferred to virtual
witnessing.

TIPS ON WITNESS TESTING

Before the Test
The witness should review the test procedure with regard
to the contract specifications in advance for acceptability and
become completely familiar with the testing methodology
before traveling to the vendor's factory. Furthermore, the
witness should become familiar with and carry copies of
necessary supporting documents to the test. Examples of such
helpful documents are given below:
Contract specifications and technical datasheets
Applicable industry standards
Test procedure(s)
Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs)
Equipment General Arrangement (GA) drawing(s)
Applicable detail drawings
Contact information of key project decision-makers
and subject matter experts
After careful review of the contract documents, the witness
should develop a checklist based on project specifications and
referenced test standards (Jones et al., 2008). This checklist
should have a list of items to be observed before, during and
after the test, besides having provisions for recording readings
from the test instrumentation in a tabular format. Table 1 of this
tutorial is an excerpt of such a checklist.

Table 1. Excerpt of a Sample Test Checklist

The contract requirements for certain critical and unique
equipment may require an engineer, in addition to the quality
inspector, to witness the tests. When a "witness" test is
specified on the datasheet or contract specifications, it
corresponds to a "hold" point on the Inspection and Test Plan to

Copyright 2011 by Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University

73

allow the purchaser to witness the test. On the other hand, an

"observed" test corresponds to a "witness" point on the
Inspection and Test Plan, wherein the vendor is only required to
notify the purchaser of an impending test. In this case, the
purchaser's attendance is not mandatory for the test to go ahead
as scheduled. This can cause confusion at times due to the
ambiguous usage of the term "witness" in two altogether
different contexts. To preclude any ambiguity, the engineer
should set up the test notification protocol for the witness test in
advance with the vendor and the quality inspector; otherwise,
there is a possibility of the notification not reaching the
appropriate engineer in good time ahead of the test.
Once the witness test notification is received from the
vendor, the witness should communicate with the vendor,
enquiring whether a preliminary test was performed on the
equipment and whether it passed. Certain expectations with
respect to the testing methods and measured parameters can
also be aligned at this time.
The witness should remember to carry certain items such
as safety shoes, safety glasses and hard hat (if needed) to the
vendor's factory. The witness should enquire with the vendor if
they can bring their own camera to the test. A personal camera
would enable them to take pictures of the test setup, equipment
and dismantled components for reporting and reference
purposes. If possible, the witness should carry a portable
vibration meter and a portable pyrometer to the test that can be
used for performing a qualitative comparison with the vendor's
test instrumentation and for taking measurements at equipment
locations that are not instrumented for the test.
Some vendors may require that outside attendees show
their passports before being allowed into the factory premises.
The witness should enquire with the vendor in advance
regarding any such requirements and carry the necessary
documents to the test.
If possible, the witness should travel to the test facility on
the day preceding the test. This way they can also check the
location of the test facility in advance to ensure that they do not
cause inadvertent travel delays on the day of the test.
At the Test
At the vendor's factory, the witness should pay attention to
and comply with all safety instructions provided by the vendor.
They should not move around in the shop area without the
vendor to escort them. They should not climb onto the test skid
to reach or see a remote location.
Before the test begins, it is helpful to reinforce the test
procedure and acceptance criteria with vendors test engineer to
ensure that there is a clear understanding among all parties
concerned. The witness should become familiar with the test
layout, instrumentation and computer displays prior to the start
of test. This becomes vital if the test duration will be very short.
The witness should ensure that the test setup is in accordance
with the accepted test procedure. For example, if the test
procedures and the contract documents so far did not call out
for a gearbox in the drive train, then the witness should
question the vendor if they see one in the test setup now.
The witness should review the calibration logs and
certificates for all test instruments and gauges prior to the test.
They should also check for zero points and readings on
instruments before the test is started (Jones et al., 2008). It is

important to ensure that the accuracy of the test instrumentation

is acceptable in light of the test acceptance tolerances.
The witness should stand several feet away from the
equipment and all electrical junction boxes and terminals while
the equipment is being started up. This would ensure safety
against unwarranted projectiles and electrical shocks. The
witness should be aware that the vendor's standards with
respect to safety may well be below their own. The shop area
typically has a lot of movement of materials, cranes, forklifts,
etc. that requires the witness to be vigilant at all times.
The witness should note down the time and date of starting
the test, besides the serial number of the equipment being tested
on their checklist.
The witness should keep their eyes and ears wide open
during the test. This means that with proper attention, it is easy
to spot operational abnormalities (overheating, no oil flow,
excessive vibration, etc.). The witness should listen for any
unexpected noise during the test. Sometimes, this is difficult
due to the ambient noise in the manufacturing facility.
Alternatively, the witness can use a mechanic's stethoscope to
listen for any unusual or excessive casing noises (Jones et al.,
2008). Excessive noise from the equipment can point to
problems such as cavitation, excessive vibration, component
looseness, etc. The witness should ask the vendor to record the
sound level prior to starting the test and also during the test for
reference purposes. Any leaks, whether on the equipment being
tested or on the test setup, should be documented.
During the mechanical run test, in particular, the witness
should plot the bearing temperature rise versus time, and also
the asymptote to determine when temperature stabilization
occurs. This can be easily done on a laptop computer during the
test. This would become even easier if the witness were to go to
the test with a spreadsheet template ready for plotting the
various bearing temperatures.
While the test is being conducted, the witness should
constantly verify that all instruments actually do work and their
measurements make sense. If an instrument fails during the test
and if all parties agree that the test can be continued with the
failed instrument, the witness should ensure that the failed
instrument and its identification number are noted by the
vendor on the test log. If the test cannot go ahead with the
failed instrument, the time of stopping the test should be noted.
Finally, if the test is deemed as failed for any reason, the
witness should not volunteer answers or direct the vendor with
solutions to the test problems. This can lead to a rather
complicated situation if the solution fails. It is advisable to
discuss the situation with the vendor and other key project
personnel to jointly arrive at the solution and agree on further
course of action.
After the Test
The witness should note down the time of stopping the test
and the test duration once the test is completed. If possible, a
few hand-calculations should be performed to verify the
numbers for a few test points. This would provide assurance
that no retesting is immediately required.
If required, the witness should sign copies of the test logs
and obtain photocopies of the test data. It is important for
everyone to realize that by signing the test logs, the witness is
only agreeing that the test was witnessed and completed per the

Copyright 2011 by Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University

74

agreed test procedures. Even though there is almost always

pressure to get the equipment shipped, signing of the test logs
must not constitute the witness' acceptance of the test results.
This is important because the raw test data typically need to be
further corrected for certain factors (viz. viscosity, specific
gravity, speed, impeller diameter) before the vendor can
generate the final test report for acceptance.
When the contract specifications require post-test teardown
for hydrodynamic bearing inspection, the witness should
carefully look for signs of any undue wear or local overheating
on the bearing surfaces. The bearing edges may be sharp and
cause injuries; hence, proper care should be taken when
handling the bearings. Pictures of the disassembled bearings
should be taken for records and future analysis. If bearing
inspection has been specified after only a short performance
test and no mechanical run test was specified or conducted, not
much bearing wear or overheating may be discernable.
Overly-tight wear ring clearances may improve pump
performance in the short term, but once the clearances open up
after continued operation, the pump performance drops.
Depending on the difference in hardness of the wear ring
materials, close clearances may also be subject to galling.
Paragraph 6.7.4 and table 6 of ANSI/API Standard 610 (2010)
specify the limits for the running clearances. Thus, when
inspecting pump impellers, the witness should watch out for
overly-tight wear ring clearances, besides other performanceenhancing items such as excessive polishing or too much
underfiling that may have been put in place solely to meet the
"as sold" performance.
At time of departure, the witness should provide the vendor
with a written summary of any test issues including a brief list
of the action items for the vendor to follow up. The summary
should list any deviations to the test procedure, contract
specifications or acceptance criteria. It is also advisable that the
witness generates a trip report soon after the test, while the test
is still fresh in the memory. A detailed trip report ensures that
other project personnel (and the client, if applicable) are kept
abreast of the test events, the witness' impressions of the test, in
addition to any results and conclusions from the test.
TESTING OF API 610 CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS
This section primarily discusses pump performance, NPSH
and mechanical run tests. Casing hydrostatic tests that ensure
the integrity of the pump pressure-containing components and
joints are considered fairly straightforward, and hence, not
covered in this section. The complete unit test is rarely
requested even for larger pumps and its acceptance criteria are
based on vendor-purchaser agreement; hence, not covered here.
The bearing-housing resonance test is often used for failure
diagnosis and troubleshooting, rather than for quality assurance.
The use of sound level tests for pump acceptance are taken
exception to by several major pump vendors since it is
normally not feasible to suppress ambient noise in the factory.
Still, the witness should request the vendor to take sound level
measurements for reference purposes during the pump
performance test.

VACUUM
PUMP
PRESSURIZED AIR
VENT

ELECTRICAL
POWER
SUPPLY

ELECTRICAL
POWER
MEASUREMENT

MOTOR

DISCHARGE
PRESSURE

SUCTION TEST FLUID

TEMP.
PRESSURE

PI

PI

TEST PUMP

SUPPRESSION
TANK

TI

FILL
DRAIN

SUCTION
VALVE

FM
FLOW
METER

DISCHARGE
CONTROL VALVE

HEAT
EXCHANGER
(OPTONAL)

Figure 1. Basic Pump Performance Test Loop

ANSI/API Standard 610 (2010) requires that, unless the
purchaser specifically chooses not to, each pump must undergo
a test to prove its performance prior to shipment. Figure 1
shows a basic pump performance test loop. The performance
test is generally conducted using cold tap water as the test fluid.
ANSI/API Standard 610 (2010), paragraph 8.3.3.2 i), requires
that the test water temperature must be limited to 130 F (55
C) maximum.
Unless performance testing with the job motor or a
complete unit test is specifically required in the contract, the
vendor will generally use a calibrated lab motor as the test
driver. ANSI/API Standard 610 (2010), paragraph 8.3.3.3 c),
requires the test speed to be within 3 percent of the pump rated
speed. If a lab motor with the required speed and power
combination is not available, then the vendor may use a
calibrated gear drive besides a lab motor to match the pump
rated speed. However, if such an arrangement is necessary, then
prior purchaser approval should have been obtained by the
vendor.
Usually, adequate NPSHA is maintained at the pump
suction during the performance test. However, in order to better
evaluate the pump performance with the specified NPSHA at
the pump suction, some purchasers may specify that the test
stand NPSHA be limited to 110 percent of that specified on the
data sheet (see ANSI/API Standard 610 (2010), paragraph
8.3.3.6). In such cases, the witness should ensure that the
vendor limits the suction pressure at each test point such that
the NPSHA is limited as specified.
Test Instrumentation
The flowrate through the test loop is generally measured
using either a calibrated venturi meter and a differential
pressure instrument (gauge, transducer or mercury manometer)
or a magnetic flow meter. The differential head across the
pump is determined from the differential pressure calculated
from the suction and discharge pressure readings and
accounting for the velocity heads and gauge elevations (see
ANSI/HI 1.6 (2000)). The power consumption is measured
using a digital or polyphase wattmeter, with current and
potential transformers or with a torque meter. Speed is
generally measured with a photo tachometer. The readings of
hand-held tachometers are generally not precise and hence, they
should not be used during the test. Temperatures of the test
water, bearing metal surfaces and lubricating oil are measured

Copyright 2011 by Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University

75

using resistance temperature detectors (RTDs) or

thermocouples. Hand-held infrared temperature sensors should
not be used to determine the oil temperature inside the bearing
housing. Since these sensors measure the skin temperature of
the bearing housing, they may not provide an accurate
indication of the oil temperature inside. Hence, where fluid
temperature measurement is necessary, a well-supported RTD
or thermocouple should be installed inside the fluid prior to
performing the test as shown in figure 2 of this tutorial.
Thermowells with suitable intermediate conducting materials
could be used if needed.

Figure 3. Bearing Housing Vibration Measurement

Figure 2. RTD for Bearing Oil Sump Temp. Measurement

Depending on the bearing configuration of the pumps
being tested, there are two classes of vibration instrumentation
that can be used: those that measure bearing housing vibration,
and those that measure shaft vibration. The measurement
locations for vibration instrumentation during the testing of
different types of pumps are shown in figures 31 through 33 of
ANSI/API Standard 610 (2010). Note that paragraph 9.2.7.3 of
the standard requires that all purchased vibration
instrumentation must be used during testing.
Bearing housing vibration is measured with accelerometers
or velocity transducers. These are simply called "vibration
transducers" in common parlance. Vibration transducers
generally provide housing vibration readings in the velocity
units of in/s (mm/s). These transducers are magnetically
attached or threaded on to the bearing housing (see figure 3 of
this tutorial) to measure vibration radially (in two planes) and
axially. Tables 8 and 9 of ANSI/API Standard 610 (2010)
provide the limits for bearing housing vibration for use as
acceptance criteria during pump testing. Figure 34 of
ANSI/API Standard 610 (2010) should be consulted for
determining the vibration limits for horizontal pumps that
operate above 3600 rpm or absorb more than 400 hp (300 kW)
power per stage.

Shaft Vibration is measured using non-contact proximity

probes. These are simply called "vibration probes" in common
parlance. Vibration probes measure shaft vibration in the
displacement units of mils (m). These probes are typically
mounted at the hydrodynamic bearing locations to read the
shaft movement as seen in figure 4 of this tutorial. Again, tables
8 and 9 of ANSI/API Standard 610 (2010) provide limits for
shaft vibration in the two radial planes. Paragraph 6.9.3.6 of the
standard requires pumps furnished with vibration probes to
meet both bearing housing and shaft vibration limits. For
pumps with vibration probes, paragraph 6.6.13 of ANSI/API
Standard 610 (2010) requires the vendor to record the electrical
and mechanical runout for the full 360 at each probe location
on the test report.

Vibration
Probes

Figure 4. Probes for Shaft Vibration Measurement

Axial position probes are mounted on the hydrodynamic
thrust bearing housing of the pump. These probes sense either
the axial movement of shaft or an integral axial surface. Note
that ANSI/API Standard 610 (2010) does not provide
acceptance criteria for axial shaft vibration. Still, where axial
position probes are provided, their measurements should be
recorded for reference during testing. These readings are
important for high suction pressure applications, where the
pump shaft has the potential of displacing appreciably in the
axial direction at startup. Prior to test startup, the witness

Copyright 2011 by Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University

76

should request the vendor to measure the electrical gap to

confirm the axial clearances in the thrust bearing.
An API 610 pump's preferred operating region is generally
70 to 120 percent of the best efficiency flowrate, as specified in
paragraph 6.1.12 of ANSI/API Standard 610 (2010). Tables 8
and 9 of the standard allow an increase in vibration of up to 30
percent for flows outside the preferred operating region, but
within the pump's allowable operating region.
Although placed outside the section on testing, bearing oil
temperature limitations are provided in paragraph 6.10.2.4 of
ANSI/API Standard 610 (2010) and should be used as
acceptance criteria during the tests. Key aspects of this
paragraph are stated below:
For pressurized oil lubrication systems, the standard
limits the oil outlet temperature to 160 F (70 C)
and its differential temperature increase, from
inlet to outlet, to 50 F (28 C).
For ring-oiled or splash lubrication systems, the
standard limits the maximum oil-sump
temperature to 180 F (82 C) and its temperature
rise to 70 F (40 C) above the ambient
temperature. Note that the standard requires the
ambient temperature in the test lab to be measured
at the time of each reading that could be
cumbersome.
If bearing temperature sensors are provided, then the
standard limits the bearing metal or outer ring
temperatures to 200 F (93 C) maximum.
For pumps with pressure-lubricated bearings, paragraph
9.2.7.2 of ANSI/API Standard 610 (2010) requires the oil
flowrate to each bearing housing to be measured and recorded.
After the performance test is completed, the vendor should
correct the raw data taken during the test to account for the
pump rated speed, besides the viscosity and specific gravity of
the actual process fluid. If post-test impeller diameter
modifications are required to meet the rated performance, they
are only permitted for less than 5 percent changes in diameter
per paragraph 8.3.3.7 a) of ANSI/API Standard 610 (2010). The
performance tolerances specified in table 16 of the standard are
applicable to these final corrected curves. Contrary to ANSI/HI
1.6 (2000), note that ANSI/API Standard 610 (2010) does not
base pump acceptance on efficiency, but on rated power.

denotes NPSHR for 3 percent head drop as "NPSH3". The

NPSH3 curve is developed using the NPSH3 values developed
from the suction pressure (and vapor pressure) for each
flowrate. Note that if the pump needs to be disassembled to
correct NPSH problems, then ANSI/API Standard 610 (2010)
paragraph 8.3.4.3.4 requires a retest for performance.
Pump Mechanical Run Test
For critical and/or unspared pumps, the contract may
require the pump to undergo a mechanical run test prior to
acceptance. The mechanical run test proves acceptable
mechanical operation over an extended period of time with
respect to vibration, bearing and oil temperatures and leakage
through mechanical seals, gaskets and oil lines. The mechanical
run test is often called the "endurance test".
Unless otherwise specified or agreed, the mechanical run
test is performed at the rated flow. Readings of vibration,
bearing temperatures and oil temperatures are taken at predetermined periodic intervals. These readings must also meet
the same acceptance criteria for vibration and temperatures as
outlined earlier for the performance tests. The witness should
monitor the flowrate during the mechanical run test and request
the vendor to adjust it during the test if it deviates greater than 5
percent of the rated flow. This becomes necessary if some play
in test discharge valve lets the flowrate drift over time.
ANSI/API Standard 610 (2010) provides options for three
types of mechanical run tests that are fairly self-explanatory:
Mechanical run test until bearing oil temperature
stabilization
Four-hour mechanical run test
Four-hour mechanical run test after bearing oil
temperature stabilization

NPSH Test
If an NPSH test has been specified, it will generally be
conducted simultaneously with the performance test. This test
is conducted by gradually reducing the pump suction pressure
by drawing vacuum on the suppression tank or by throttling the
suction valve until the differential head developed (first-stage
head in a multistage pump) drops by 3 percent at every flowrate
(except shutoff).
The vacuum suppression method employs reduction of the
suction pressure by creating a partial vacuum in the suppression
tank with the use of a vacuum pump. On the other hand, the
valve throttling method utilizes reduction of the suction
pressure by throttling the suction valve. The vacuum
suppression method is more common since the throttling action
on the suction valve may cause disturbance in the flow, thus
affecting the accuracy of the results.
It should be noted that ANSI/API Standard 610 (2010)
Copyright 2011 by Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University