Manac-1: Group Assignment BM 2013-15 Section A
Manac-1: Group Assignment BM 2013-15 Section A
Manac-1: Group Assignment BM 2013-15 Section A
Group Assignment
BM 2013-15 Section A
GROUP 3
ABHAVE SHARMA (B13001)
GIRISH DESHPANDE (B13025)
KETAN LUKHI (B13031)
RAMAN SINGH (B13044)
SUMIT TANEJA (B13056)
VAIBHAV CHOPRA (B13059)
VISHAP RANA (B13061)
Balance Sheet
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
As of
st
4,131
36,894
4,131
35,681
Non-Current Liabilities
Long-Term Borrowings
Deferred Tax Liabilities (Net)
Other Long Term Liabilities
Long-Term Provisions
13,486
1,729
1,271
4,204
11,587
1,644
1,346
3,525
Current Liabilities
Short-Term Borrowings
Trade Payables
Other Current Liabilities
Short-Term Provisions
TOTAL
8,015
3,322
8,655
2,513
84,218
4,511
3,220
8,396
2,297
76,337
ASSETS
As of
st
15,235
1,543
35,891
718
3,165
51
15,748
1,410
28,049
685
2,614
78
16,008
4,424
3,850
991
2,343
84,218
13,742
4,749
6,416
785
2,061
76,337
49,987
5,389
44,598
964
45,563
21,198
3
(2,016)
23,021
5
1,369
8,637
748
1,403
12,161
7,932
678
1,567
10,707
229
-
1,058
12
(0)
42,134
3,428
42
3,470
229
3,241
1,070
2,170
467
306
511
1,501
113
(6)
46,335
1,629
47,965
42,541
5,423
(11)
5,413
262
5,151
1,608
3,543
123
28
2,170
9
3
0
3,682
2,170
4,131
5.25
3,543
4,131
8.58
3,241
5,151
1,406
748
0
1,086
(25)
(826)
(59)
5,570
1,574
678
1
79
(20)
(1,464)
(57)
5,940
(2,266)
330
(704)
732
(269)
3,391
(987)
2,404
(2,440)
(632)
(452)
260
(179)
2,498
(1,456)
1,042
(9,120)
39
2
2,512
(33)
836
59
(5,705)
(9,398)
38
6
10,733
(1)
1,890
57
3,326
4
5,143
(748)
(991)
(161)
3,248
(53)
330
277
0
159
(3,086)
(620)
(991)
(161)
(4,699)
(332)
662
330
Year e
Entry tax of 888.46 crore (current year 163.83 crore) in the state of Chhatisgarh and 170.32
crore (current year 39.20 crore ) in the state of Odisha
Income tax demand of 87.62 crore
Claims of 217.40 crore (current year 88.80 crore) by DVC for supply of Power
The impact of above items has resulted in overstatement of profit for the current year by 397.07
crore, cumulative Profit by 1445.44 crore and understatement of Liability by 1445.44 crore.
There were some other matters with which auditors have objections. Auditors drew the attention of
management towards following points:
During the year, the accounting policy regarding amortisation of Mining Rights has been
revised from the lease period to annual production vis-a-vis total estimated mineable
reserves. As a result, the profit for the year is higher by 214.14 crore. But no explanation is
given as to why the method was changed and this change was not reflected in the policy
employed.
The auditors were unable to comment on the adequacy of provision of 611.03 crore (including
549.95 crore provided for during the year) for pending finalisation of fresh agreement with
non-executives in respect of wage revision due from 1st January, 2012.
The reason being management has not provided any explanation on the estimation of this
revise wage provisions.
In view of the assumptions provided by the Company relating to the salary escalation rates,
auditors were unable to comment on the adequacy of provision for retirement employee
benefits.
The reason being the complete explanation is not given for the provision of retirement
employee benefits. For example, direct estimation of 1230.01 crore for post-retirement
medical benefits and 117.43 crore for post-retirement settlement benefit have been provided
with no evident explanation of estimation.
During the development of financial statements, consultancy fee in respect of deferred capital
schemes amounting to 107.17 crore and non-capitalisation of assets valued at 981.83 were
included in Capital Work in Progress.
But in reality, the consultation is to be implemented in near future and some capital schemes
have not been capitalized due to lack of sustained production and hence, according to
auditors, these should have not been reported under Capital Work in Progress.
Rourkela Steel Plant of the Company has proposed to the Government Odisha for an out of
court settlement of the matter relating to levy of water tax under the provisions of Odisha
Irrigation Act, 1959. If the settlement is accepted, the Company may have to pay an amount
which shall be mutually agreed with the State Government of Odisha. According to auditors,
the amount to be paid has not been estimated and reported in contingent liabilities.
Auditors also have objection with the NRV of assets which are retired from active use.
Management says:
Assets retired from active use and waiting for disposal amounting to 30.50 crore has been
shown under " Tangible Fixed Assets", the net realizable value of which in the opinion of the
management will not be less than the amount shown and does not require any provision.
To reduce debtors velocity and inventory velocity. To reduce inventory velocity, SAIL can
reduce stores & spares inventory and offer discount on finished goods along with reduction
in debtors velocity by offering them discounts to reduce the blocking of capital.
Clearing of finished goods stock can also help increase the fixed asset turnover ratio and
capital turnover ratio which have been continuously decreasing since FY 2010-11.
Talking about profitability ratios, the ratios are less promising as compared to that of competitors
which may be due to the blocking of finished goods inventory. On the expenses front, employee
benefits expenses have been continuously rising with 9% YoY in FY 2012-13 but total sales decreased
in 2012-13 as compared to 2011-12 which can be major concern for the company.
Groups Suggestion:
Suggestion mentioned above can also help improve the profitability ratios as it would help
increase the sales. On the expenses front, management can look at the reasons for
continuously rising expenses benefits and can take necessary steps to check the expenses.
Modernization:
On a positive note, Debt/Equity ratio of SAIL is 0.54 which is also very low as compared to
some of its competitors. SAIL can leverage this opportunity and can go for more long term
debt which can be used to expedite the modernization.
In solvency ratios, Quick ratio is also severely affected. Quick ratio of SAIL is 0.5 which is also very low
as compared to that of competitors. Due to this company may end up in severe liquidity crunch.
Groups Suggestions:
The suggestion one mentioned above can also help alleviate the liquidity crunch the company
currently is facing.
Current liquidity crunch can also be alleviated by taking short term debt. The reason being D/E
ratio is very low which can be leverage to increase the debt.
The current Return on Total Assets (RoTA) for sales is 2.15%. DuPont Analysis suggest that decreasing
the current assets, which effectively means lowering the inventory levels, can improve the asset
utilization and hence sales turnover. Similarly putting a curb on the expenses, especially on the
employee benefit expenses, would certainly help SAIL increase its profit (as mentioned earlier the
employee benefit expenses form a major part in the total operating expenses).
ANNEXURE - 1
Financial Ratio Calculations
FY13
Name of Ratio
ROE
RONW
Gross Profit Margin
EBITDA Margin
EBIT Margin
Profit Margin
EBIT/Total Assets
Proprietary Ratio
Quick Ratio
Current Ratio
Debt Equity Ratio
Fixed Asset Turnover
Capital Turnover ratio
FY12
FY11
Debtors velocity1
SAIL
4.5%
4.5%
12.4%
12.3%
9.3%
3.9%
5.0%
1.1
0.5
1.2
0.5
0.8
0.9
36.7
Tata Steel
9.2%
9.2%
24.8%
24.3%
29.1%
12.9%
NA
NA
0.6
0.9
0.5
1.0
NA
8.1
JSPL
19.5%
19.5%
24.0%
23.7%
30.6%
15.7%
NA
NA
0.9
0.7
1.3
0.9
NA
22.6
JSW
9.0%
9.0%
12.2%
12.1%
17.8%
5.0%
NA
NA
0.7
0.9
0.9
0.9
NA
16.6
SAIL
8.9%
8.9%
17.2%
16.0%
12.7%
7.4%
8.0%
0.9
0.8
1.5
0.4
1.0
0.9
33.8
Tata Steel
12.8%
12.8%
32.1%
31.6%
35.5%
19.5%
NA
NA
0.5
0.8
0.5
1.5
NA
7.2
JSPL
23.8%
23.8%
31.4%
30.5%
38.6%
21.0%
NA
NA
1.0
0.8
1.4
0.8
NA
26.0
JSW
8.8%
8.8%
12.1%
12.0%
17.4%
5.0%
NA
NA
0.5
0.8
0.7
0.9
NA
12.5
SAIL
13.2%
13.2%
23.2%
20.2%
16.8%
10.9%
9.9%
0.9
1.0
1.5
0.5
1.1
1.0
31.1
Tata Steel
14.2%
14.2%
34.2%
33.8%
38.1%
23.2%
NA
NA
1.5
1.8
0.6
1.3
NA
5.4
JSPL
21.9%
21.9%
27.8%
27.1%
34.8%
19.6%
NA
NA
0.7
0.7
1.2
0.8
NA
25.2
JSW
12.1%
12.1%
14.1%
14.0%
20.1%
8.6%
NA
NA
0.5
0.8
0.7
0.8
NA
11.1
Inventory velocity1
Interest Coverage
136.0
5.6
45.3
5.5
75.6
6.3
45.1
2.7
115.1
9.0
38.8
5.9
62.8
7.9
45.8
3.4
107.9
15.9
37.1
6.1
45.3
7.9
51.4
4.4
= EBIT/Sales
= (EBITDA - D&A)/Sales
= (5,621 - 1,403)/45,663
= 9.3%
b) SOLVENCY RATIOS
Proprietary Ratio = Fixed Assets/Capital Employed
= 5,602/53,065
= 1.07
Quick Ratio = (Current Assets - Inventories)/(Current Liabilities)
= 11,608/22,505
= 0.52
Current Ratio = Current Assets/Current Liabilities
= 27,616/22,504
= 1.15
Debt Equity Ratio = Debt/Equity
= (Short Term Loan + Long Term Loan)/Net Worth
= 21,501/39,579
= 0.54
c) TURNOVER RATIOS
Fixed Asset Turnover = Sales/Fixed Assets
= 45,563/56,602
= 0.80
Capital Turnover ratio = Sales/Capital Employed
= 45,563/53,005
= 0.86
d) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Debtor velocity = Avg. Debtors/Sales * 365
= 4,586/45,563 *365
= 36.74
Inventory velocity = Avg. Inventory/Sales
= 14,875/45,563 *365
= 136.00
e) COVERAGE RATIO
Interest Coverage = EBIT/Finance Costs
= 4218/748
= 5.64
PAT/Sales
3.9%
PAT
1773
GP
5,640
Sales
45,563
Sales/TA
54.1%
Sales
45,563
Sales
45,563
Other Expenses
3,867
COGS
39,923
Calculation of Z-score:
X1 = working capital / total assets =5,112/84,218 = 0.06
X2 = cumulative retained earnings / total assets = 35,449/84,218 = 0.42
X3 = EBIT / total assets = 4,218/84,218 = 0.05
X4 = market value of equity / total book value of liabilities = 19,661/44,639 = 0.44
X5 = sales / total assets = 45,563/84,218 = 0.54
TA
84,218
FA
56,602
CA
27,616