3li53 - Call Apn Def
3li53 - Call Apn Def
3li53 - Call Apn Def
(2014-2020)
COVER
Table of contents
Introduction
2.1:
2.2:
2.3:
2.4:
Introduction:
The URBACT III Operational Programme (CCI 2014TC16RFIR003) was
officially adopted on 12th December 2014 by Commission Implementing
Decision C(2014) 9857. The adopted OP can be found on the URBACT
website1
The URBACT III Monitoring Committee adopted the present Call for
Proposals for Action Planning Networks on 10th March 2015.
In this context, the Commissariat Gnral lgalit des
territories (CGET) (France), Managing Authority of the URBACT III
Operational programme, issues a
This Call for Proposals is open from XXX March 2015 until 16 June
2015, 03 pm CET2.
Manual3. These Fact Sheets were approved by the URBACT III Monitoring
Committee in February and March 2015. In particular the following Fact
Sheets are recommended reading for potential candidates:
and also outside, civil society, private sector, associations, etc.) in the
action-planning process. These key stakeholders will be gathered in an
URBACT Local Group. They will be actively involved in the transnational
exchange activities and in the development of the Integrated Action Plan
to be produced by the city. The participatory approach shall improve the
action-planning process and the subsequent delivery of the local policies
(strengthening the evidence base, ensuring ownership of the problems
identified and of the solutions/ policies developed, creating the conditions
for a successful delivery, etc.).
2.2 Beneficiaries
For transnational exchange and learning activities (and thus for Action
Planning Networks), the URBACT III Operational Programme identifies the
Programme area and defines two categories of beneficiaries: the main
beneficiaries (city partners) and other beneficiaries (non-city partners).
The URBACT III programme area consists of:
The 28 EU Member States
having
delegated
competences
for
policy-making
and
implementation in the policy area covered by the URBACT network.
There is no limit of size (population) for cities wishing to participate in
URBACT activities.
In addition to city partners, Action Planning Networks can also include a
limited number of other beneficiaries (non-city partners). The list of
other eligible beneficiaries (non-city partners) is defined as follows:
14
Staff costs
Expenditure on staff members employed by the partner
organisation, who are formally engaged to work on the project
15
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
assistance, etc.) through the network budget under the category External
Expertise.
Stage 2
Stage 3
Stage 4
2. Phase 2 Applications
Stage 5
Stage 6
Stage 7
Stage 8
provided in the Fact Sheet 2D of the URBACT III Programme Manual. The
assessment criteria for project proposals are outlined below:
Criterion 1: Relevance of the topic/theme/policy issue addressed
1.1
The proposal contributes to the objectives of the EU2020 strategy and it is in
line with one or more of the Thematic Objectives for EU Cohesion Policy
2014-2020
1.2
The thematic approach proposed clearly identifies key urban
challenges/issues to be specifically addressed by the network
1.3
The Phase 1 application proposes an integrated response to the challenge
1.4
The proposal documents and demonstrates added value of the proposal
compared to previous URBACT networks on related issues. The relationship
to existing or previous non URBACT networks is made evident (e.g. Interreg,
NGOs. Etc)
Criterion 2: Coherence of the general approach proposed
2.1. The proposed methodology and activities will improve the capacities of
cities to design sustainable urban strategies and action plans (Specific
Objective 2 for Action Planning Networks in the Operational Programme
2014-2020).
2.2. The proposal has a clear focus on exchange of experiences and it builds on
partners experience and knowledge
2.3. The proposed methodology is realistic and coherent (the activities are
logically sequenced and linked interlinked)
2.4. The proposal shows a clear understanding of what is expected in terms of
activities and outputs from Action Planning Networks for Phase 2, especially
in relation to the organisation of proposed Transnational exchange and
learning activities (Work Package 2) and the proposed Impact on local
governance and urban policies ( Work Package 3)
Criterion 3: Quality of the proposal for Phase 1
3.1(Clarity) The work plan for Phase 1 is clearly presented with description of
the planned activities and expected outputs
3.2(Coherence) The activities are logically interlinked and in line with the
objectives for Phase 1 (enlargement of the partnership, production of the
Baseline study, elaboration of the Phase 2 Application)
3.3The methodology for enlarging the partnership is clearly set out (e.g. call for
expression of interest, screening questionnaire, selection process)
3.4The Methodology for the production of the Baseline study including its
components of State of the Art, partner profiles and synthesis are clearly set
out.
Criterion 4: Quality of initial partnership
4.1(Relevance) The urban challenges and types of possible policy response to
be addressed by the networks are relevant for each of the cities proposed in
the initial partnership
4.2(Diversity) The proposed partnership for Phase 1 covers a range of EU
settings. In cases where the geographical coverage is limited, this is clearly
justified in the Phase 1 application.
4.3(Coherence) The experience of cities involved in the initial partnership is
relevant to address the challenges identified in the Phase 1 application and
the cities are able to take steps to address these challenges (e.g. having
appropriate competence, resources, political support and motivation)
20
4.4(Quality of project partner Profiles) Each partner sets out in detail their local
situation, their needs and their expected results at local level and these are
logically connected
4.5Each local partner has identified an appropriately skilled and experienced
local coordinator.
4.6The designated URBACT expert(s) has relevant experience in supporting
transnational exchange and learning activities and relevant expertise in
relation with the issues to be addressed by the network
Criterion 5: Quality of leadership
5.1The Lead Partner demonstrates competency in managing EU co-financed
projects or can ensure adequate measures for management support
5.2The named person to act for the Lead Partner (project coordinator) has
experience (from attached CV) of this type of work
5.3The project coordination of the Lead Partner is well organised and clearly
presented (who will do which tasks) Sufficient resources are indicated for the
lead partner tasks
Criterion 5: Budget and finances for Phase 1
6.1
The project budget is proportionate to the proposed work plan and the
main outputs and results proposed.
6.2
The total partner budgets reflect real partner involvement (are balanced
and realistic)
6.3
The project budget is justified, clear and realistic.
22
24
25