Primes in The Interval (2n, 3n)
Primes in The Interval (2n, 3n)
Primes in The Interval (2n, 3n)
3n
2
n
<
6.75
n
.
2. If n is even such that n > 152 then
3n
2
n
>
6.5
n
.
3. If n is odd and n > 7 then
3n+1
2
n
<
6.75
n1
.
618 M. El Bachraoui
4. If n > 945 then
(
6.5
27
)
n
> (3n)
3n
2
.
Proof. (1,2) By induction on n. We have
3
2
3154
2
154
>
6.5
154
.
Assume now that the two inequalities hold for
3n
2n
. Then
3n + 3
2n + 2
3n
2n
3n
2n
3(3n + 1)(3n + 2)
(2n + 1)(2n + 2)
=
3n
2n
27n
2
+ 27n + 6
4n
2
+ 6n + 2
.
It now suces to note that for all n
27n
2
+ 27n + 6
4n
2
+ 6n + 2
< 6.75
and for all n > 12
6.5 <
27n
2
+ 27n + 6
4n
2
+ 6n + 2
.
(3) By induction on n. We have
14
9
< (6.75)
4
. Assume now that the result is
true for
3n+2
2n+1
. Then
3n + 5
2n + 3
3n + 2
2n + 1
3(3n + 4)(3n + 5)
2(n + 2)(2n + 3)
< (6.75)
n
6.75
= (6.75)
n+1
.
(4) Note that the following three inequalities are equivalent:
(
6.5
27
)
n
> (3n)
3n
2
nln
6.5
27
>
3n
2
ln 3n
2
3
ln
6.5
27
>
ln 3n
n
.
Then the result follows since the function
ln3x
x
is decreasing and
2
3
ln
6.5
27
>
ln(3 946)
946
.
Primes in the Interval [2n, 3n] 619
Lemma 1.2. 1. If n is even then
n
2
<p
3n
4
p
n<p
3n
2
p <
3n
2
n
.
2. If n is odd then
n+1
2
<p
3n
4
p
n<p
3n+1
2
p <
3n+1
2
n
.
Proof. (1) We have
3n
2
n
=
(n + 1)
3n
2
n
2
!
. (1.1)
Then clearly
n<p
3n
2
p divides
3n
2
n
. Furthermore, if
n
2
< p
3n
4
then 2p
occurs in the numerator of (1.1) but p does not occur in the denominator.
Then after simplication of 2p with an even number from the denominator
we get the prime factor p in
3n
2
n
. Thus
n
2
<p
3n
4
p divides
3n
2
n
3n
2n
=
(2n + 1)(2n + 2) 3n
1 2 n
, (1.2)
the product of primes between 2n and 3n, if there are any, divides
3n
2n
. Fol-
lowing the notation used in [3], we let
T
1
=
3n
p
(p)
, T
2
=
3n<p2n
p
(p)
, T
3
=
2n+1p3n
p,
such that
3n
2n
= T
1
T
2
T
3
. (1.3)
The prime decomposition of
3n
2n
n
j
px
p < 4
x
, refer to [3, p.
167], we have that:
If n is even then
T
2
<
3n<p
n
2
p
n
2
<p
3n
4
p
n<p
3n
2
p
< 4
n
2
3n
2
n
< 4
n
2
(6.75)
n
2
=
27
n
.
(1.4)
If n is odd then
T
2
<
3n<p
n+1
2
p
n+1
2
<p
3n
4
p
n<p
3n+1
2
p
< 4
n+1
2
3n+1
2
n
< 4
n+1
2
(6.75)
n1
2
= 4
27
n1
<
27
n
.
(1.5)
Thus by (1.4) and (1.5) we nd the following upper bound for T
2
:
T
2
<
27
n
. (1.6)
In addition, the prime decomposition of
3n
2n
3n)
. (1.7)
See [3, p. 24]. Then by virtue of Lemma 1.1(2), equality (1.3), and the
inequalities(1.6), and (1.7) we nd
(6.5)
n
< T
1
T
2
T
3
< (3n)
(
3n)
27
n
T
3
,
which implies that
T
3
>
6.5
27
n
1
(3n)
(
3n)
.
Primes in the Interval [2n, 3n] 621
But (
3n)
3n
2
. Then
T
3
>
6.5
27
n
1
(3n)
3n/2
> 1, (1.8)
where the second inequality follows by Lemma 1.1(4). Consequently, the prod-
uct T
3
of primes between 2n and 3n is greater than 1 and therefore the existence
of such numbers follows.
Corollary 1.4. For any positive integer n 2 there exists a prime number p
satisfying
n < p <
3(n + 1)
2
.
Proof. The result is clear for n = 2. For even n > 2 the result follows by
Theorem 1.3. Assume now that n = 2k + 1 for a positive integer k 1. Then
by Theorem 1.3 there is a prime p satisfying
2(k + 1) < p < 3(k + 1) =
3(n + 1)
2
,
and the result follows.
References
[1] T. M. Apostol. Introduction to Analytic Number Theory. Undergraduate Texts in Math-
ematics. Springer, 1998. xii+338 pp.
[2] P. Erdos. Beweis eines satzes von tschebyschef. Acta Litt. Univ. Sci., Szeged, Sect. Math.,
5:194198, 1932.
[3] P. Erdos and J. Suranyi. Topics in the theory of numbers. Undergraduate Texts in Math-
ematics. Springer Verlag, 2003. viii+287 pp.
Received: May 16, 2006