The sender sent a notice to a law office requiring validation of a debt according to federal law. In response, the law office only provided a computer-generated printout of the amount owed, but failed to provide an executed credit contract proving liability or that the amount was accurate. This response was rejected as insufficient validation of the debt. The law office was notified that if the collection listing is not removed from the sender's credit report, a lawsuit will be filed for violating the sender's right to debt validation under federal law.
The sender sent a notice to a law office requiring validation of a debt according to federal law. In response, the law office only provided a computer-generated printout of the amount owed, but failed to provide an executed credit contract proving liability or that the amount was accurate. This response was rejected as insufficient validation of the debt. The law office was notified that if the collection listing is not removed from the sender's credit report, a lawsuit will be filed for violating the sender's right to debt validation under federal law.
The sender sent a notice to a law office requiring validation of a debt according to federal law. In response, the law office only provided a computer-generated printout of the amount owed, but failed to provide an executed credit contract proving liability or that the amount was accurate. This response was rejected as insufficient validation of the debt. The law office was notified that if the collection listing is not removed from the sender's credit report, a lawsuit will be filed for violating the sender's right to debt validation under federal law.
The sender sent a notice to a law office requiring validation of a debt according to federal law. In response, the law office only provided a computer-generated printout of the amount owed, but failed to provide an executed credit contract proving liability or that the amount was accurate. This response was rejected as insufficient validation of the debt. The law office was notified that if the collection listing is not removed from the sender's credit report, a lawsuit will be filed for violating the sender's right to debt validation under federal law.
I have sent you a notice requiring you to verify this debt in accordance with 15 USC 1692g. I have included a copy of the original dispute, which lists in detail the type of verification requested.
In response you have only sent a computer generated print-out of the total amount you claim is due, which may not be accurate. Furthermore, you have failed to provide an executed credit contract proving liability of this debtor on the amount claimed.
This is unsatisfactory as proof that I owe the debt (please see Fields v. Wilber Law Firm, Donald L. Wilber and Kenneth Wilber, USCA-02-C-0072, 7th Circuit Court, Sept 2004.), and is hereby rejected as a validation of the debt. You have not complied with my right to have the debt validated according to the standards of the FDCPA, and your response is hereby rejected as a validation of the debt.
You must now remove the collection listing from my credit report, or I will file a lawsuit for violation of FDCPA, 809(b).
Thank you for your assistance as I assert my right to have a proper validation of the referenced account according to law.