A History of Pantomime by Broadbent, R. J.

The Project Gutenberg eBook, A History of Pantomime, by R.
J. Broadbent
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net
Title: A History of Pantomime
Author: R. J. Broadbent
Release Date: September 15, 2004 [eBook #13469]
Language: English
Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A HISTORY OF PANTOMIME***
E-text prepared by Jonathan Ingram, Linda Cantoni,

and the Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team
The Project Gutenberg eBook, A History of Pantomime, by R. J. Broadbent 1

A
A 2
HISTORY OF PANTOMIME.
BY
R. J. BROADBENT,
Author of "STAGE WHISPERS," etc.
LONDON
1901
TO
WILLIAM WADE, ESQUIRE.

This book is dedicated as a small token of the Author's esteem and regard.
R.J.B.
CONTENTS.
PREFACE
CHAPTER I.
Origin of Pantomime
CHAPTER II.
Origin of Tragedy and Comedy—Mythology—The meaning of the word Pantomime—The

origin of Harlequin, Columbine, Clown, and Pantaloon—Grecian
HISTORY OF PANTOMIME. 3
The Project Gutenberg eBook of A History of Pantomime, by R. J. Broadbent
Mythology—Transformation Scenes—The rise of Grecian Tragedy and Comedy—The

Satirical Drama
CHAPTER III.
The origin of the Indian Drama—Aryan Mythology—Clown and Columbine—Origin of the

Chinese Drama—Inception of the Japanese Drama—The Siamese Drama—Dramatic
performances of the South Sea Islanders, Peruvians, Aztecs, Zulus, and Fijis—The Egyptian
Drama
CHAPTER IV.
"Dancing," i.e. Pantomime—Grecian Dancing and Pantomimic

Scenes—Aristotle—Homer—Dances common to both Greeks and Romans
CHAPTER V.
Thespis—The Progress of Tragedy and Comedy—Aeschylus—The

Epopée—Homer—Sophocles—Euripides—Grecian Mimes—The First Athenian
Theatre—Scenery and Effects
CHAPTER VI.
Roman Theatres—Description—"Deadheads"—Pantomime in Italy—Livius

Andronicus—Fabulae Atellanae—Extemporal Comedy—Origin of the Masque,
Opera, and Vaudeville—Origin of the term
Histrionic—Etruscans—Popularity of Pantomime in Italy—Pantomimists
banished by Trajan—Nero as a Mime—Pylades and Bathyllus—Subjects
chosen for the Roman Pantomimes—The Ballet—The Mimi and
Pantomimi—Archimimus—Vespasian—Harlequin—"Mr.
Punch"—Zany, how the word originated—Ancient Masks—Lucian,
Cassiodorus, and Demetrius in praise of Pantomime—A celebrated
Mima—Pantomimes denounced by early writers—The purity of the English
stage contrasted with that of the Grecian and Roman—Female parts on the Grecian and
Roman stages—The principal Roman Mimas—The origin of the Clown of the
early English Drama
CONTENTS. 4
CHAPTER VII.
Introduction of the Roman Pantomimic Art into Britain—First English reference to the
word Pantomime—The fall of the Roman Empire—The sacred
play—Cornish Amphitheatres—Pantomimical and Lyrical elements in the
sacrifice of the Mass—Christian banishment of the Mimis—Penalties imposed
by the Church—St. Anthony on Harlequin and
Punch—Vandenhoff—what we owe to the Mimis
CHAPTER VIII.
Pantomime in the English Mystery or Miracle Plays and Pageants—A retrospect of the
Early Drama—Mysteries on Biblical events—Chester, Coventry, York, and
Towneley Mystery Plays—Plays in Churches—Traces of the Mystery Play in
England in the Nineteenth Century—Mystery Plays on the Continent—The
Chester series of Plays—The Devil or Clown and the Exodiarii and Emboliariae of the
Ancient Mimes
CHAPTER IX.
The Clown or Fool of the early English Drama—Moralities—The

Interlude—The rise of English Tragedy and Comedy—"Dumb Shews" in the
Old Plays—Plays suppressed by Elizabeth—A retrospect
CHAPTER X.
The Italian Masque—The Masque in England—First appearance in this country

of Harlequin—Joe Haines as Harlequin—Marlowe's "Faustus"—A
Curious Play—The Italian Harlequin—Colley Cibber,
Penkethman—Shakespeare's Burlesques of the Masque—Decline of the Masque
CHAPTER XI.
Italian Pantomime—Riccoboni—Broom's
"Antipodes"—Gherardi—Extemporal Comedies—Salvator
Rosa—Impromptu Acting
CONTENTS. 5
CHAPTER XII.
Pantomimical Characters—Neapolitan Pantomime—The Harlequin

Family—The Original Characters in the Italian Pantomimes—Celebrated
Harlequins—Italian and French Harlequins—A French view of the English
Clown—Pierrots' origin—Pantaloon, how the name has been
derived—Columbine—Marionette and Puppet Shows
CHAPTER XIII.
Italian Scenarios and English "Platts"—Pantaloon—Tarleton, the

Clown—Extemporal Comedy—The Poet Milton—Ben
Jonson—The Commonwealth—"A Reign of Dramatic Terror"—Robert
Cox and his "Humours" and "Drolleries"—The Restoration
CHAPTER XIV.
Introduction of Pantomimes to the English Stage—Weaver's "History of the Mimes

and Pantomimes"—Weaver's Pantomimes—The prejudice against
Pantomimes—Booth's counsel
CHAPTER XV.
John Rich and his Pantomimes—Rich's Miming—Garrick, Walpole,

Foote—Anecdotes of Rich—Pope—The dance of internals in "Harlequin
Sorcerer"—Drury Lane—Colley Cibber—Henry Fielding, the
Novelist—Contemporary Writers' opinion of Pantomime—Woodward, the
Harlequin—The meaning of the word Actor—Harlequins—"Dr. Faustus,"
a description—William Rufus Chetwood—Accidents—Vandermere, the
Harlequin—"Orpheus and Eurydice" at Covent Garden—A
description—Sam. Hoole, the machinist—Prejudice against
Pantomime—Mrs. Oldfield—Robert Wilks—Macklin—Riot at
Lincoln's Inn Fields Theatre—Death of Rich
CHAPTER XVI.
Joseph Grimaldi
CONTENTS. 6
CHAPTER XVII.
Plots of the old form of Pantomimes—A description of "Harlequin and the Ogress; or
the Sleeping Beauty of the Wood," produced at Covent Garden—Grimaldi, Père et
Fils—Tom Ellar, the Harlequin, and Barnes, the Pantaloon—An account of the
first production of the "House that Jack built," at Covent Garden—Spectacular
display—Antiquity and Origin of some Pantomimic devices—Devoto, Angelo,
and French, the Scenic
Artists—Transparencies—Beverley—Transformation Scenes
CHAPTER XVIII.
Pantomimic Families—Giuseppe Grimaldi—James Byrne, the Harlequin and

Inventor of the modern Harlequin's dress—Joseph Grimaldi, Junior—The
Bologna Family—Tom Ellar—The Ridgways—The
Bradburys—The Montgomerys—The Paynes—The
Marshalls—Charles and Richard Stilt—Richard Flexmore—Tom
Gray—The Paulos—Dubois—Arthur and Charles
Leclerq—"Jimmy" Barnes—Famous Pantaloons—Miss
Farren—Mrs. Siddons—Columbines—Notable Actors in Pantomime
CHAPTER XIX.
Popular Pantomime subjects—Poor Pantomime Librettos—Pantomime subjects

of our progenitors—The various versions of "Aladdin"—"The Babes in the
Wood"—"Blue Beard"—"Beauty and the
Beast"—"Cinderella"—"Dick Whittington"—"The House that Jack
Built"—"Jack the Giant Killer"—"Jack and the Beanstalk"—"Red
Riding-Hood"—"The Sleeping Beauty in the Wood"—Unlucky
subjects—"Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves"—"The Fair One with Golden
Locks"—The source of "Sindbad the Sailor" and "Robinson Crusoe"
CHAPTER XX.
Pantomime in America
CHAPTER XXI.
CONTENTS. 7
Pantomimes made more attractive—The Restrictive Policy of the Patent

Houses—"Mother Goose" and "George Barnwell" at Covent Garden—Lively
Audiences—"Jane Shore"—"Harlequin Pat and Harlequin Bat"—"The
first speaking opening"—Extravagence in Extravaganzas—The doom of the old
form of Pantomime—Its revival in a new form—A piece of pure
Pantomime—Present day Mimetic Art—"L'Enfant Prodigue"—A
retrospect—The old with the new, and conclusion
PREFACE.
One of the most important factors in the making of Theatrical History has been that of Pantomime, yet in
many of the published works dealing with the History of the Stage it has, with the exception of a passing
reference here and there, been much neglected.
It is with a view of conveying to the reading public some little, and, perhaps, new information about this
ancient form of entertainment that I am tempted to issue this History of Pantomime in the hope and belief that
it may not only prove interesting, but also instructive, to all lovers of the Stage.
R.J.B.
Liverpool, December, 1901.
CHAPTER I.
Origin of Pantomime.
From the beginning of all time there has been implanted in the human breast the Dramatic instinct full of life
and of vigour, and finding undoubtedly its outlet, in the early days of civilization, if not in the Dramatic Art
then in the poetry of motion with that necessary and always essential concomitant of
both—Pantomime. Indeed, of the Terpsichorean Art, it has been truly observed "That deprived of the
imitative principle (i.e., Pantomime), the strength, the mute expression, it becomes nothing but a series of
cadenced steps, interesting merely as a graceful exercise." Equally so in every way does it apply to the
Dramatic Art, which minus its acting, its gestures—in a word, its Pantomime—we have nothing
but, to quote Hamlet, "Words, words, words."
In observing "That all the world's a stage, and the men and women merely players," Shakespeare doubtless
included in the generic term "players," Pantomimists as well: Inasmuch as this, that when, and wherever a
character is portrayed, or represented, be it in real life or on the stage—"Nature's looking-glass," and
PREFACE. 8
the world in miniature—the words that the individual or the character speaks, are accompanied with
gesture and motion, or, in other words, Pantomime, when "The action is suited to the word, the word to the
action."
To trace the original origin of Pantomime, or Mimicry, we must go to Nature herself where we can find this
practised by her from the beginning of all time as freely, and as fully, as ever it was, or ever will be, upon the
stages of our theatres. What better evidence, or instances, of this can we have than in those studies of her
handiwork? as the larger species of caterpillars, when, by stretching themselves out in imitation of, and to
make their foes think that they are snakes; tigers and lions choosing a background in keeping with, and in
imitation of, the colours of their bodies, in order to seize their unwary prey; and for the same purpose
crocodiles imitating a rotting log; the green tint of the lizard's skin for the sake of concealment; the playful
imitativeness of the mocking bird; the hysterical laugh of the hyaena; the gaudy colours of tropical snakes
imitated by others, besides many other examples of Mimicry, in such as butterflies of the species Danaidae
and Acraediae, the Heliconidiae of tropical America; and hornets, wasps, ants, and bees. All this, it may be
urged, is only instinct. True; but is it not also Mimicry—the Pantomime of Nature, and, though, of
course, of a different kind, and for very different objects, is, nevertheless, of a kind of instinctive Pantomime
or Mimicry which each and every one of us possesses in greater or lesser degrees, and as much as we do the
Dramatic instinct.
The very name Pantomime itself signifies Nature as Pan was amongst the Ancients, the allegorical god of
Nature, the shepherd of Arcadia, and with Mimos, meaning an imitator, we have, in the combination of these
two words, "an imitator of Nature," and from whence we derive the origin of our word Pantomime.
Dryden says:—
"Pan taught to join with wax unequal reeds;

Pan loves the shepherds and the flocks he feeds."
"Pan," says Servius, "is a rustic god, formed in similitude of Nature, whence he is called Pan, i.e., All: for he
has horns in similitude of the rays of the sun and the horns of the moon; his face is as ruddy as the imitation of
the aether; he has a spotted fawn skin on his breast in likeness of the stars; his lower parts are shaggy on
account of the trees, shrubs, and wild beasts; he has goat's feet to denote the stability of the earth; he has a
pipe of seven reeds on account of the harmony of the heavens, in which there are seven sounds; he has a
crook, that is a curved staff, on account of the year, which runs back on itself because he is the god of all
Nature."
Bernardin de St. Pierre observes of Pantomime, "That it was the first language of man; it is known to all
nations; and is so natural and so expressive that the children of white parents learn it rapidly when they see it
used by the negroes."
Of the Pantomimic language—a universal language and common to the whole world from time
immemorial—Charles Darwin says in his "Descent of Man," that "The intellectual and social faculties
of man could hardly have been inferior in any extreme degree to those now possessed by the lowest savage;
otherwise primeval man could not have been so eminently successful in the struggle for life as proved by his
early and wide diffusion. From the fundamental differences between certain languages some philologists have
inferred that, when man first became widely diffused, he was not a speaking animal; but it may be suspected
that languages, far less perfect than any now spoken, aided by gestures, might have been used, and yet have
left no traces on subsequent and more highly-developed tongues."
With the progress of, and also as an aid to, civilization how could the traveller or the trader, not only in the
beginning of time, but also now, when occasion demands, in their intercourse with foreign nations (unless, of
Origin of Pantomime. 9
course, they know the language) make themselves understood, or be able to trade, unless they were or are able
to use that "dumb silent language"—Pantomime? Civilization undoubtedly owes much of its progress
to it, and, also the world at large, to this only and always universal language. To both the deaf, as well as the
dumb, its advantages have ever been apparent.
Therefore, from prehistoric times, and from the beginning of the world, we may presume to have had in some
form or another, the Pantomimic Art. In the lower stages of humanity, even in our own times, there is, in all
probability, a close similarity to the savagedom of mankind in the early Antediluvian period as "This is shown
(says Darwin) by the pleasure which they all take in dancing, rude music, painting, tattooing, and otherwise
decorating themselves—in their mutual comprehension of gesture language, and by the same
inarticulate cries, when they are excited by various emotions." It naturally follows that even if there was only
dancing, there must necessarily, as a form of entertainment, have also been Pantomime. Again, all savage
tribes have a war-dance of some description, in which in fighting costume they invariably go through, in
Pantomimic form, the respective movements of the Challenge, the Conflict, the Pursuit, and the Defeat, whilst
other members of the tribe, both men and women, give additional stimulus to these representations by a rude
form of music.
The Ostyak tribe of Northern Asia give us a specimen of the rude imitative dances of early civilization in a
Pantomimic exhibition of the Chase; the gambols and habits of the wolf and other wild beasts. The
Pantomimic dances of the Kamchadales are in imitation of birds, dogs, and bears; and the Damaras represent,
by four of the tribe stooping down with their heads together, and uttering harsh cries, the movements of oxen,
and of sheep. The Australian Bushmen Mimic the leaping of calves, the antics of the baboon, and the buzzing
of swarms of bees. Primitive Pantomimic dancing is practised amongst the South Sea Islanders, and other
races, and just as it was, presumably, at the beginning of the world.
Having briefly traced the origin of Pantomime, and the source of dancing, let us, in order to further amplify
my subject, look at also for a moment the origin of music, in the time of prehistoric man.
From Nature also do we derive this art, as "The sighing of the wind passing over a bed of reeds is Nature's
first suggestion of breath," and of music. The clapping of hands and the stamping of feet is man's first element
in the making of music, which developed itself into the formation of drums, bells, and cymbals, and the
evolution of the same primary principle.
It has been argued, and also ridiculously pretended, that in the Antediluvian period mankind only lived in
caves with the hairy mammoth, the cave bear, the rhinoceros, and the hyaena, in a state of barbarous savagery;
and that only since the Deluge have the Arts been known and cities built on this terrestrial sphere of ours.
Could anything be more fallacious?
We know, from the Bible, that the first man was created about six thousand years ago, and some sixteen
hundred and fifty-six years afterwards the inhabitants of the world, with the exception of Noah and his family,
consisting of eight souls all told, were destroyed by the flood. Noah and his family, we can take it, were of the
same race of mankind then on the earth, of the same descent and of the same flesh and blood (as we all are) of
our common father and mother, Adam and Eve; yet we are not told that Noah (he was six hundred years old
when he went into the Ark) and his family were savages. In the 4th chapter, 21st verse of Genesis, of
Jubal-Cain, we learn that "He was the father of all such as handle the harp and organ"; and in the following
verse, Tubal-Cain is described as "An instructor of every artificer in brass and iron."
We learn, also, that magnificent statues were made in Egypt some six thousand years ago; and that mention is
made of a statue of King Cephren, said to have been chiselled about this period, and many learned men also
affirm that letters were known to the inhabitants of the Antediluvian world. All this, however, hardly looks
like the work of a barbarous race, and points to an acquaintance with the Arts, at any rate of Music and
Origin of Pantomime. 10
Sculpture, and that of the artificers and workers in brass and iron.
To follow, for my subject, this reasoning a little further, if there was music (which, doubtless, there was) there
must also have been dancing, and, if dancing, there must, in the Antediluvian age, as a form of entertainment,
have also been Pantomime. On the other hand, even supposing that man, at this period, was nothing else but a
complete savage, the words of Darwin, that I have quoted on a previous page, conclusively proves, I think (on
a common-sense like basis), of the existence of dancing, a rude form of music, and, of course, Pantomime at
this epoch.
Ingersoll's doctrine was that "The distance from savagery to Shakespeare must be measured not by hundreds,
but by millions, of years."
Finally, why, and for what reason, should the Lord God, in His all-seeing goodness and mercy, punish the
inhabitants of the Antediluvian world if they were only poor unenlightened savages? Was it not because they
were idolaters and worshippers of idols, "And that every imagination of the thoughts of his (man's) heart was
only evil continually," as the sixth chapter and fifth verse of Genesis tells us? This then being so, we know
also that in every ancient form of religion dancing was one of the acts of worship, and if dancing, there must
as previously stated, have also been Pantomime.
CHAPTER II.
Origin of Tragedy and Comedy—Mythology—The

meaning of the word Pantomime—The origin of Harlequin,
Columbine, Clown, and Pantaloon—Grecian
Mythology—Transformation Scenes—The rise of Grecian
Tragedy and Comedy—The Satirical Drama.
In the year 2347 B.C., in Chapter 9, verse 20, in Genesis, there occurs: "And Noah began to be a husbandman,
and he planted a vineyard." This is one of the first acts that Noah did after the Deluge, and it is, as history tells
us, from the rites and ceremonies in celebration of the cultivation of the vine, that we owe the origin of
Tragedy and Comedy.
After the Deluge God placed His bow in the heavens as His covenant with man that the world should no more
be accursed; and in the first ages of this world's history, Noah and his descendants celebrated their deliverance
from the Ark, the return of the seasons, and the promise of plenty in their several religious rites and
ceremonies. The children of Shem had in general Asia as their portion; Japhet had Europe; and Ham, Africa.
Soon, however, religion began to lose its purity, and it then began to degenerate very fast. Men began to repair
to the tops of mountains, lonely caves and grottoes, where they thought resided their gods. To honour them
they erected altars and performed their vows. Amongst the Ancients their Mythology went no further than the
epoch of the Deluge, and in honour of which, and also of the Ark, they erected many temples called Aren,
Theba, Argus (from whence was probably derived the Argo of the Argonauts, and the sacred ship of Osiris),
Cibotus, Toleus, and Baris.
CHAPTER II. 11
The symbol by which the Mythologists represented the Ark was an immense egg. This was supposed to have
been produced by Ether and Chaos, at the bidding of Time, the one ethereal being who created the universe.
By Nox (Night) the egg was hatched, which, being opened into two parts, from the upper part was formed
heaven, and the lower earth.
In the sacred rites of Osiris, Isis, and the Dionysia of Bacchus, the Ark or Ship was introduced. The Dove, by
many nations, in their celebrations, was looked upon as a special emblem of peace and good-will. Theba, in
Egypt, was originally one of the temples dedicated to the Ark. Both priests and sooth-sayers were styled Ionah
or Doves. To Dodona, in Epirus, was brought this and the first Grecian oracle all the rites and history of the
Thebans. The priestesses of this temple were known in the Latin as Columbae. It is from this word that we
derive the name Columbine, which means, in the Italian, "little dove." Homer alludes to the priestesses as
doves, and that they administered to Zeuth (Noah). Nonnus speaks of Cadmus, and others of Orpheus, as
introducing into Greece the rites of Dionysus or Bacchus.
The Ancients, mentions Kennedy in his work on "Mythology," have highly reverenced Noah, and designated
him as Noa, Noos, Nous, Nus, Nusas, Nusus (in India), Thoth, Hermes, Mercury, Osiris, Prometheus,
Deucalion, Atlas, Deus, Zeus, and Dios. Dios was one of the most ancient terms for Noah, and whence was
derived Deus—Nusus compounded of Dios and Nusos, which gives us Dionysus, the Bacchus of the
Greeks, and the chief god of the heathen world. Bacchus was, properly speaking, Cush (the son of Ham, and
grandson of Noah), though both Dionysus and Bacchus are, by ancient writers, frequently confounded with
one another.
The resting of the Ark upon Mount Baris, Minyas, the Ararat of Moses in Armenia, the dispersal of the flood,
the multiplication of the families of the earth, and the migration from the plains of Shinar of the descendants
of the sons of Chus or Cush (as it is sometimes written), and called Chushites or Cushites, to different parts of
the world, being joined by other nations, particularly those of the descendants of Ham, one of the sons of
Noah. They were the first apostates from the truth, but being great in worldly wisdom and knowledge they
were thought to be, and looked upon as a superior class of beings. Ham they looked upon as a divinity, and
under the name of Ammon they worshipped him as the Sun, and Chus likewise as Apollo, a name which was
also bestowed by the Ancients upon Noah. The worship of the sun in all probability originated the eastern
position in our churches.
Another of the ancient deities worshipped by the Ammonians was Meed, or Meet, the Cybele of the
Phrygians, the nurse of Dionysus, and the Soul of the World.
Nimrod, the "mighty hunter" (who possessed the regions of Babylonia and Chaldee), and one of the sons of
Cush, was the builder of that seminary of idolatory the City and Tower of Bel, and erected in honour of the
god Bel, and another name for the sun. Upon the confusion of tongues when hitherto "The whole earth was of
one language, and of one speech," it came to be known as Babylon, "The City of Confusion." Homer
introduces Orion (Nimrod) as a giant and a hunter in the shades below, and the author of the "Pascal
Chronicles" mentions that Nimrod taught the Assyrians or Babylonians to worship fire. The priests of
Ammon, named Petor or Pator, used to dance round a large fire, which they affected in their dancing to
describe. Probably from this the Dervish dances all over the East may be traced to this source.
Kennedy observes, of the confusion of tongues at Babel, that it was only a labial failure, so that the people
could not articulate. It was not an aberration in words or language, but a failure and incapacity in labial
utterance. Epiphanius says that Babel, or Babylon, was the first city built after the flood.
The Cushites were a large and numerous body, and after their dispersion from Babylon they were scattered
"Abroad upon the face of the earth." They were the same people who imparted their rites and religious
services into Egypt, as far as the Indus and the Ganges, and still further into Japan and China. From this event
Origin of Tragedy and Comedy—Mythology—Themeaning of the word Pantomime—The

12 origin o
is to be discovered the fable of the flight of the Grecian god Bacchus, the fabulous wanderings of Osiris, and
the same god under another name, of the Egyptians. Wherever Dionysus, Osiris, or Bacchus went, the
Ancients say that he taught the cultivation of the soil, and the planting of the vine. Dionysus, Bacchus, or
Osiris, as I have shown in a preceding page, were only other designations for Noah.
Of the Hindu heathen deity, Vishnu, Father Boushet mentions an Indian tradition, concerning a flood which
covered the whole earth, when Vishnu made a raft, and, being turned into a fish, steered it with his tail.
Vishnu, like Dagon, was represented under the figure of a man and fish.
Strangely enough, the regions said to have been traversed by Dionysus, Osiris, or Bacchus were, at different
times, passed through by the posterity of Ham, and in many of them they took up their residence. In his
journeyings the chief attendants of Osiris, or Bacchus, were Pan, Anabis, Macedo, the Muses, the Satyrs, and
Bacchic women were all in his retinue. The people of India claim him as their own, and maintain that he was
born at Nusa in their country. Arrian speaks of the Nuseans as being the attendants of Dionysus. In all
traditions Dionysus appears as the representative of some power of Nature.
The first who reduced Mythology to a kind of system were, in all probability, the Egyptians. Egypt was ever
the land of graven images, and under the veil of Allegory and Mythology the priests concealed religion from
the eyes of the vulgar. In the beginning, brute animals and certain vegetables were represented as the visible
symbols of the deities to which they were consecrated. Hence Jupiter Ammon was represented under the
figure of a Ram; Apis under a Cow; Osiris of a Bull; Mercury or Thol of an Ibis; Diana or Babastis of a Cat;
and Pan of a Goat. From these sources are derived the fabulous transformation of the gods celebrated in
Egyptian Mythology, and afterwards imported into Greece and Italy to serve as the subjects of the Grecian
and Roman Pantomimes.
Pantomime as we now know the term, means, not only the Art of acting in dumb show, but also that of a
spectacle or Christmas entertainment. (I may add in parenthesis, that in the early part of the last
century—the nineteenth—the dictionaries only refer to Pantomime as meaning the former of the
above two definitions, and not the latter.)
Pan, regarded as the symbol of the universe, was also the god of flocks, pastures, and shepherds in classic
Mythology, and the guardian of bees, hunting and fishing in his Kingdom of Arcadia. His form, like the
Satyrs, both supposed to have been the offsprings of Mercury, was that of a man combined with a goat, having
horns and feet like the latter animal.
Mimos (Gr.), as I have stated in the beginning, means an "imitator," or a "mimic," and from which word we
have the derivation of the words "mimicry," "mimetic," and the like.
Pan was the traditional inventor of the Pandean pipes, and also from his name we derive many words that are
in our language, such as "panic" (Pan used to delight in suddenly surprising the shepherds whilst tending their
flocks), and the other attributes of this noun, including that recently coined term of the Americans, "panicy."
Pan is said to have been the son of Mercury, or even Mercury himself, and others say that he was the son of
Zeus. Mercury and Zeus, it will be remembered in Mythology, were only names for Noah. Pan is unnoticed by
Homer.
A heathen deity of Italy, Lupercus, the guardian of their flocks and pastures, has also been identified with Pan,
and in whose honour annual rural festivals, known as Lupercalia, were observed.
The Lupercalian festivals were held on the 15th of the Kalends of March. The priests, Luperci, used to dance
naked through the streets as part of the ceremonies attached to the festival.

13 origin o
Mention has been made by Dr. Clarke, in his "Travels," Vol. IV., that Harlequin is the god Mercury, with his
short sword herpe, or his rod, the caduceus (which has been likened to the sceptre of Judah), to render himself
invisible, and to transport himself from one end of the earth to the other, and that the covering on his head, the
winged cap, was the petasus. Apropos of this, the following lines in the tenth Ode, of the first book of Horace,
will probably occur to the reader:
"Mercury! Atlas' smooth-tongued boy, whose will

First trained to speed our wildest earliest race,
And gave their rough hewn forms with supple skill
The gymnast's grace.
"'Tis thine the unbodied spirits of the blessed,

To guide to bliss, and with thy golden rod
To rule the shades; above, below, caressed
By every god."
Mercury, as we have seen, was among the Ancients, only another name for Noah. "Indeed," says Dr. Clarke,
"some of the representations of Mercury upon ancient vases are actually taken from the scenic exhibitions of
the Grecian theatre; and that these exhibitions were also the prototypes whereon D'Hancarville shows
Mercury, Momus, and Psyche delineated as we see Harlequin, Columbine, and Clown on our stages. The old
man (Pantaloon), is Charon (the ferryman of hell). The Clown is Momus, the buffoon of heaven, the god of
raillery and wit, and whose large gaping mouth is in imitation of the ancient masks."
Amongst the Aryans, Medians, Egyptians, Chaldeans, Babylonians, and other nations (including our own, as
did not Lilly predict the execution of Charles I., the plague, the great fire of London, and other events) was
astrology practised. The Egyptians peopled the constellation of the Zodiac (the first open book for mankind to
read), with Genii, and one of the twelve Zodiacal signs was Aries (the Ram). The ram is of the same species
as the goat, and the god Pan was the Goat god, as we know. The astrologers, in their divinations and rulings of
the planets placed the various parts of the body under a planetary influence. The head and face were assigned
to the house of Aries, and therefore the face notably for the Pantomimic Art was placed by the ancient
astrologers under the influence of this particular planet.
The heathen worship of Pan was not only known in Arcadia, but also throughout Greece, although it did not
reach Athens until after Marathon.
Of Pan's death Plutarch tells the story that in the reign of Tiberius, one Thamus, a pilot, visiting the islands of
Paxae, was told of this god's death. When he reached Palodes he told the news, whereupon loud and great
lamentations were heard, as of Nature herself expressing her grief. The epoch of the story coincides with the
enactment of that grim, and the world's greatest tragedy on the hill of Golgotha, and the end, and the
beginning of a new world. Rabelais, Milton, Schiller, and also Mrs. Browning, have allusions to this story of
Plutarch's.
The ambitious family of the Titans (the bones of the "giants on the earth" before the Deluge, gave rise to the
stories of the Titans found in caves), and their scions and coadjutors Jupiter, Juno, Mars, Mercury, Apollo,
Diana, Bacchus, Minerva, or Pallas, Ceres, Proserpine, Pluto, and Neptune furnish by far the greatest part of
the Mythology of Greece. Tradition says that they left Phoenicia about the time of Moses to settle in Crete,
and from thence they made their way into Greece, which was supposed at that time to be inhabited by a race
of savages. The arts and inventions were communicated to the natives, and the blessings of civilization in
process of time inspired the inhabitants with admiration. They, therefore, relinquished worshipping the
luminary and heavenly bodies, and transferred their devotion to their benefactors. Then into existence sprang
the most inconsistent and irreconcilable fictions. The deified mortals, with their foibles and frailities, were

14 origin o
transmitted to posterity in the most glorious manner possible, and hence accordingly, in both the Odyssey and
the Iliad of Homer, we have a strange and heterogeneous mixture of what is not only mighty in heroes, but
also that which is equally mean.
In the Grecian Mythology the labours of Hercules, the expedition of Osiris, the wanderings and
transformation of Io, the fable of the conflagration of Phaeton, the rage of Proserpine, the wanderings of
Ceres, the Eleusinian Mysteries, the Orgia, or sacred rites of Bacchus, in fine, the ground work of Grecian
Mythology is to be traced to the East, from where also all our nursery tales, and also our popular Pantomime
subjects; (which is the subject of another chapter) perhaps, with the exception of our own "Robinson Crusoe,"
originated.
The nine Muses called Pierides in Grecian Mythology were the daughters of Jupiter and Mnemosyne
(Memory), supposed to preside over the liberal Arts and the sciences. They were Calliope (Heroic Poetry),
Clio Euterpe (Music), Erato (Love Poetry), Melpomene (Tragedy), Polyhymnia (Muse of Singing and
Rhetoric), Terpsichore (Dancing), Thalia (Comedy), and Urania (Astronomy). Mount Parnassus, Mount
Helicon, and the fountains of Castalia and Aganippe were the sacred places of the Muses.
The Eleusinian Mysteries are of a period that may be likened to the 7th century B.C., and at these Mysteries as
many as 30,000 persons, in the time of Herodotus, assembled to witness them. The attributes of these Grecian
Mysteries, like those of the Egyptians, consisted of processions, sacrificial offerings, purifications, dances,
and all that the Mimetic and the other Arts could convey; add to this the various coloured lights, and the
fairy-like grandeur of the whole, we have something that may be likened to the Transformation, and other
fairy-like scenes of English Pantomimes and Extravaganzas.
At the Orgia, or sacred rites of Bacchus, the customary sacrifice to be offered, because it fed on vines, was the
goat. The vine, ivy, laurel, asphodel, the dolphin, lynx, tiger, and ass were all sacred to Bacchus. The
acceptable sacrifice to Venus was a dove; Jupiter, a bull; an ox of five years old, ram or boar pig to Neptune;
and Diana, a stag. At the inception of the Bacchanalian festivals in Greece, the tragic song of the Goat, a
sacred hymn was sung, and from which rude beginning sprang the Tragedy and Comedy of Greece. The
Greeks place every event as happening in their country, and it is not surprising that they claim for themselves
the inception of Tragedy and Comedy, which they undoubtedly were the originators of in Greece, but the
religious festivals of Dionysus, Osiris, and Bacchus, to which we are supposed to owe the inception of
Tragedy and Comedy, were known long before the Greeks knew them. (Dionysus was the patron and
protector of theatres.) "The purport of the song was that Bacchus imparted his secret of the cultivation of vines
to a petty prince in Attica, named Icarius, who happened one day to espy a goat brouzing upon his plantations,
immediately seized, and offered it up as a sacrifice to his divine benefactor; the peasants assembled round
their master, assisted in the ceremony, and expressed their joy and gratitude in music, songs, dances, and
Pantomime on the occasion; the sacrifice grew into a festival, and the festival into an annual solemnity,
attended most probably every year with additional circumstances, when the countrymen flocked together in
crowds, and sang in rustic strains the praises of their favourite deity."
Amongst the reported followers of these Bacchanalian festivals were those fabulous race of grotesque sylvan
beings, previously referred to, known as the Satyrs. They were of a sturdy frame, in features they had broad
snub noses, and appeared in rough skins of animals with large pointed ears, heavy knots on their foreheads,
and a small tail. The elder Satyrs were known as Sileni. The younger were more pleasing and not so grotesque
or repulsive in appearance as the elder Satyrs. To the Satyrs can be traced the variegated dress of the modern
Harlequin, as in ancient Greek history mention is made of the performers enacting Satyrs being sometimes
habited in a tiger's skin of various colours, which encircled the performer's body tightly, and who carried a
wooden sword, wore a white hat, and a brown mask. According to Servius (as we have seen) Pan had also a
bright spotted dress "in likeness of the stars."

15 origin o
From these rustic festivals originated the Satyr, or Satirical Drama, as did its Italian prototype, the Fabulae
Atellanae or, Laudi Osci. These rural sacrifices became, in process of time, a solemn fast, and assumed all the
pomp and splendour of a religious ceremony; poets were employed by the magistrate to compose hymns, or
songs, for the occasion; such was the rudeness and simplicity of the age that their bards contended for a prize,
which, as Horace intimates, was scarce worth contending for, being no more than a goat or skin of wine,
which was given to the happy poet who acquitted himself best in the task assigned him.
From such small beginnings Tragedy and Comedy took their rise; and like (as the best writers on these
subjects tell us) every other production of human art, extremely contemptible; that wide and deep stream,
which flows with such strength and rapidity through cultivated Greece, took its rise from a small and
inconsiderable fountain, which hides itself in the recesses of antiquity, and is almost buried in oblivion; the
name alone remains to give us some light into its original nature, and to inform us, that Tragedy and Comedy,
like every other species of poetry, owe their birth to Religion.
Appropriately does Horace observe:—
"Nor was the flute at first with silver bound,

Nor rivalled emulous the trumpet's sound;
Few were its notes, its forms were simply plain,
Yet not unuseful was its feeble strain,
To aid the chorus, and their songs to raise,
Filling the little theatre with ease,
To which a thin and pious audience came
Of frugal manners, and unsullied fame."
CHAPTER III.
The origin of the Indian Drama—Aryan

Mythology—Clown and Columbine—Origin of the
Chinese Drama—Inception of the Japanese Drama—The
Siamese Drama—Dramatic performances of the South Sea
Islanders, Peruvians, Aztecs, Zulus, and Fijis—The Egyptian
Drama.
Of the Indian Drama we learn that the union of music, song, dance, and Pantomime took place centuries ago
B.C., at the festivals of the native gods, to which was afterwards added dialogue, and long before the advent,
out of which it grew, of the native drama itself.
The progenitors of the Indo-European race, the Aryans—in Sanscrit meaning

Agriculturists—who crossed the Indus from Amoo, where they dwelt near the Oxus, some two
thousand years before Christ, were the original ancestors and people of India.
CHAPTER III. 16
The Aryan race (Hindus and Persians only speak of themselves as Aryans) laid the foundation of the Grecian
and Roman Mythology, the dark and more sombre legends of the Scandinavian and the Teuton; and all
derived from the various names grouped round the Sun god, which in the lighter themes the Aryans associated
with the rising and the setting of the sun, in all its heavenly glory, and with the sombre legends the coming of
the winter, and marking the difference between lightness and darkness.
In India the origin of dramatic entertainments has been attributed to the sage Bharata (meaning an actor), who
received, it is said, a communication from the god Brahma to introduce them, as the latter had received his
knowledge of them from the Vedas. Bharata was also said to be the "Father of dramatic criticism."
Pantomimic scenes derived from the heathen Mythology of Vishnu—a collection of poems and hymns
on the Aryan religion—are even now in India occasionally enacted by the Jatras of the Bengalis and the
Rasas of the provinces in the west, and, just as their forefathers did ages and ages ago. An episode from the
history of the god Vishnu, in relation to his marriage with Laxmi, was a favourite subject for the early Indian
Drama. Of Vedic Mythology Professor Max Müller observes that in it "There are no genealogies, no settled
marriages between gods and goddesses. The father is sometimes the son, the brother, the husband, and she
who in one hymn is the mother, is in another the wife. As the conceptions of the poet vary so varies the nature
of these gods."
The Hindoo dramatic writer, Babhavñti—the Indian Shakespeare—introduced with success in

one of his dramas, like in our "Hamlet," "a play within a play," and much in a similar way as our early
dramatists used in their plays, the "dumb shows."
Between the native Tragedy and Comedy, as in China, there was no definite distinction, and, although both
contained some of the best and noblest sentiments, yet the racial philosophy of caste enters greatly into the
construction of each.
In the Hindoo Mythology we have prototypes of the gods of the Egyptian, Grecian, and Roman Mythologies.
The god Vishnu, who, in Aryan Mythology, is the wind and "Traverses the heavens in three strides," is the
greatest of all heathen deities. His dwelling-place was "The aerial mountains, where the many horned and
swiftly moving cattle abide." In Grecian Mythology Hermes or Mercury took on some of the characteristics of
Vishnu.
In the Eleusinian Mysteries of the Greeks, the signs and symbols that marked the worship of Vishnu by the
Aryans, are apparent; and in the British Museum the scenes of the vases of the Hamilton collection agree
closely with the Sacti rites of Hindustan.
After having briefly noticed and introduced Vishnu or Hermes to the notice of the reader, we will now take
another of the Aryan deities—See-Va, the Wine god. This myth was the Dionysus, or Bacchus, of the
Greeks, and the expedition of this "immortal" through the world to instruct mankind in agriculture, is likened
as well as the god himself by the Egyptians to their deity Osiris—the god of the Nile. The worship of
See-Va, Bacchus, or Osiris extended over Asia Minor, Greece, and Italy.
The visit and advent of the Wine or Pleasure god Bacchus to India, with his accompanying train of sylvan and
rural deities, and nymphs, is supposed to have conquered the Hindoos, and taught them civilization, besides
the cultivation of the vine. Strange to relate that when Alexander and his army reached the present Cabul they
found ivy and wild vines (both sacred to Bacchus) growing in abundance, and they were met by processions
dressed in parti-coloured dresses, playing on drums like the Bacchic festivals of Greece and Lower Asia of
that time.
Female parts were acted by women, but it was not a general custom; and the Clown of the piece was always a
Brahma, or if not, at any rate a pupil of Brahma.
The origin of the Indian Drama—AryanMythology—Clown and Columbine—Origin of 17

theChinese
Also among the minor characters was the Vita, "the accomplished companion," a part sometimes played by
men and sometimes by women. Probably in this in the latter instance we have the origin of the Columbine and
Soubrette part in after years of the European stage as the term "accomplished companion," would equally
apply to both. It is only a surmise, yet history as we know is continually repeating itself—even in
Soubrette parts, and in more senses than one.
Of scenic displays that it possessed there was little or none, though the exits and entrances to the stage had
probably some device to denote them. What they possessed in the way of properties it is more than useless to
speculate, as, whatever could be said, could only be conjectural. In dressing their parts propriety in costume,
and in adhering to the habits of the Indian Drama, seems to have been observed with some show of
consistency.
The Chinese Drama also arose from the Hindoo developing itself as time rolled on from Pantomimes and
ballets. A very ancient Pantomime is said to have been symbolical of the conquest of China by Wou Wang.
Others were on subjects of the Harvest, War, and Peace; whilst many were only of an obscure nature. With the
rise and progress of the native drama about five hundred years before Christ Pantomimes fell into disrepute.
It is interesting to note that one of the penal codes of the Celestial Empire was, that those who wrote plays
with vicious, or immoral tendencies, should stay in "purgatory" as long as their plays were performed. This
precept was all right in theory, but in practice it was more honoured in the breach than in the observance, as
amongst the whole of the Celestial dramatic writers only one in about ten thousand seems to have conformed
to this rule.
The dramatic writers of China duly observed the question of rank and priority, and just as much as the native
Hindoo writers observed that of the various phases of caste.
Plays were divided into acts and scenes, and occasionally were prefixed by a prologue. Performances took
sometimes a single day, and favourite plays oftentimes longer.
The Japanese type of drama seems to have originally evolved itself from that of the Chinese, though its
singing, dancing, historical, and Pantomimical displays are, of course, purely native.
A native of Japan, though of Chinese descent, Hadu Kawatsa, at the close of the 6th century (A.D.) gave
dramatic entertainments in Japan. The Japanese claim for the Pantomimical dance Sambâso as a preventative
of earthquakes and volcanic eruptions; and this dance, it is said, that within recent years, is used as a prelude
to dramatic entertainments.
Isono Zenji is thought to have been the originator of the Japanese Drama, but her performances were more
those of the Mima—dancing and posturing.
In the seventeenth century Saruwaka Kanzaburô introduced the drama proper into Japan by the erection, in
1624, of a theatre, and nearly fifty years later than the first permanent theatre that was erected (1576) in
England.
Popular historical subjects were chosen for the plays, though the names of the characters were transformed.
Fancy plays, operas, ballets, which in the latter women appeared, became also very popular.
Within sight of the closing years of the last century (the nineteenth), Japanese actors were more or less under a
ban when the same was happily removed.
The origin of the Indian Drama—AryanMythology—Clown and Columbine—Origin of 18

theChinese
Siam was content with the Indian style of dramatic and Pantomimic entertainments. Theatrical performances
were also slightly known—though no regular type of drama is known—amongst the South Sea
Islanders, the Peruvians, the Aztecs, the Zulus, and the Fijis, the two last named having a similar version of
our popular Pantomime subject, "Jack and the Beanstalk."
The Egyptians possessed no regular type of drama, yet in both the Books of Job and Ruth the dramatic
element is strongly marked. At the rustic festivals of the native gods, as in Greece and Italy, there was,
however, the dramatic elements of the union of song, dance, and Pantomime, and we are told that the priests
not only studied music, but also taught the art to others. Again in the rites of the dead the Mysteries of the
sepulture over the transmigration of souls, the dramatic element entered largely into these mystic rites and
celebrations. Amongst the Pagan Greeks, as I have previously stated, and the Romans, we learn of similar
celebrations, carried out with great pomp and ceremony, such as the apotheosis of the soul departing from its
earthly to its heavenly abode.
CHAPTER IV.
"Dancing," i.e. Pantomime—Grecian Dancing and Pantomimic

Scenes—Aristotle—Homer—Dances common to
both Greeks and Romans.
In tracing the History of Pantomime it becomes a matter of considerable difficulty, and, as Baron, in his
Lettres sur la Danse, observes that when the word Dancing occurs in an old author, that it should always be
translated by "gesticulation," "declamation," or "Pantomime." When we read that an actress "danced" her part
well in the tragedy of Medea, that a carver cut up food dancing, that Heligobalus and Caligula "danced" a
discourse for an audience of state, we are to understand that they—actress, carver, and
emperor—declaimed, gesticulated, made themselves understood in a language without words. Acting is
also oftentimes confounded with dancing, and it is, therefore, manifestly impossible to distinguish now one
from the other.
"The Greeks," mentions Butteux, applied the term "Dancing" to all measured movements, even to military
marching. They danced anywhere and everywhere; and we are told that both their limbs and bodies spoke.
Cybele was supposed by the Greeks to have taught dancing on Mount Ida to the Corybantes, and they also say
that it was in their country that Apollo revealed the Terpsichorean Art, and that of Music and Poetry.
After all this, it is not very surprising that they make claim for the innovation of Pantomime. This, of course,
we know is different, as we have seen that, from time immemorial Pantomimic scenes and dances have been
represented. Cassiodorus attributes its institution to Philistion; Athenaens assigns it to Rhodamanthus, or to
Palamedes.
With the Greeks, Pantomimes became very popular, and they were distinguished by various names. Before
they began their Tragedies the Greeks used to give a Pantomimic display. The principal Pantomimists were
known as Ethologues, meaning painters of manners. One of the most celebrated of these Mimes was Sophron
CHAPTER IV. 19
of Syracuse. In depicting the conduct of man so faithfully, the Pantomimes of the Greek Mimes served to
teach and inculcate useful moral lessons. The moral philosophy of the Mime, Sophron, was so pure that Plato
kept a book of his poems under his pillow when on his death-bed. Besides these Moralities, as they were
termed, there were, in addition, light pieces of a farcical kind, in the portrayal of which the Mimes were
equally as successful as in the other species.
The dancing of the Greeks was an actual language, in which all sentiments and passages were interpreted. By
the aid of the Terpsichorean Art, Professor Desrat says, "That the Greeks, a nation of heroes, trained
themselves in the art of hand-to-hand combat."
"Dancing," says another writer, "and imitative acting in the lower stages of civilization are identical, and in
the sacred dances of ancient Greece we may trace the whole Dramatic Art of the modern world. The Spartans
practised dancing as a gymnastic exercise, and made it compulsory upon all children from the age of five."
And we are also told that religious processions went with song and dance (and, of course, Pantomime), to the
Egyptian temples; the Cretan chorus sang hymns to the Greek gods; David danced in procession before the
Ark of the Covenant; and that we are to "Praise the Lord with the sound of the trumpet, praise Him with the
psaltery and the harp; praise Him with the timbrel and the dance."
Aristotle speaks of Mimetic dances three hundred years before the Augustan era. He also says that dancers
want neither poetry or music, as by the assistance of measure and cadence only they can imitate human
manners, actions, and passions.
Again, "Homer, describing the employment of the Delian priestesses, or Nuns, of the order of St. Apollo of
Delos, that they were great adepts in the Art of Mimicry, and that part of the entertainment which they
afforded to the numerous people of different nations; who formed their congregations was, as the poet
expresses it, from their being skilled to imitate the voices and the pulsation or measure of all nations, and so
exactly was their song adapted that every man would think he himself was singing."
Homer also mentions a dance invented for Ariadne. In the midst of the dancers, there were two dancers who
sang the adventures of Daedalus, supplementing their singing by gestures, and explaining in Pantomime the
subject of the whole performance.
The Pyrrhic dance of the Greeks was a sort of military Pantomime. The Greeks had several kinds of Pyrrhic
dances, the names of which varied with the character of the performance.
The Hyplomachia imitated a fight with shields.

The Skiamachia was a battle with shadows,
The Monomachia was an imitation of single combat.
Some of the Mimetic dances common to both Greeks and Romans were The Loves of Adonis and Venus, the
Exploits of Ajax, the Adventures of Apollo, the Rape of Ganymede, the Loves of Jupiter and Danae, the Birth
of Jupiter, Hector, the Rape of Europa, the Labours of Hercules, Hercules Mad, the Graces, Saturn devouring
his Children, the Cybele in honour of Cybele, the Cyclops, the Sorrows of Niobe, the Tragic End of Semele,
the Wars of the Titans, the Judgment of Paris, Daphne pursued by Apollo, the Bucolic Dance, and the Dance
of Flowers.
"Dancing," i.e. Pantomime—Grecian Dancing and PantomimicScenes—Aristotle—Homer&mdash

20
CHAPTER V.
Thespis—The Progress of Tragedy and

Comedy—Aeschylus—The
Epopée—Homer—Sophocles—Euripides—Grecian
Mimes—The First Athenian Theatre—Scenery and
Effects.
When Thespis first pointed out the tragic path, and when (as Horace tells us in his Odes) that "The inventor of
the Art carried his vagrant players on a cart," by his introduction of a new personage, who relieved the chorus,
or troop of singers, by reciting some part of a well-known history, or fable, which gave time for the chorus to
rest. All that the actors repeated between the songs of the chorus was called an episode, or additional part,
consisting often of different adventures, which had no connexion with each other. Thus Pantomime, the song,
and the dance, which were at first the only performances, became gradually and insensibly a necessary and
ornamental part of the drama.
From this time, the actor, or reciter, was more attended to than the chorus; however, his part was executed,
and it had the powerful charms of novelty to recommend it, and quickly obscured the lustre of the chorus,
whose songs were now of a different nature, insomuch that the original subject of them, the praise of Bacchus,
was by degrees either slightly mentioned, or totally passed over and forgotten; the priests, who we may
suppose for a long time presided over the whole, were alarmed at so open a contempt of the deity, and
unanimously exclaimed, that this was nothing to Bacchus; the contempt grew into a kind of proverbial saying,
and as such is handed down to us.
From the origin of Tragedy and Comedy, and to the days of Thespis, and from this time to that of Aeschylus,
all is doubt, conjecture, and obscurity; neither Aristotle, nor any other ancient writer, gives us the least insight
into the state and progress of the Greek Drama; the names of a few, and but a few, tragedians, during this dark
period, are handed down to us; such were Epigenes, the Sicyonion, and Pratinas, who wrote fifty-two plays,
thirty-two of which are said to be satirical. After Thespis, came his scholar Phrynicus, who wrote nine
tragedies; for one of which, we are told, he was fined fifty drachmas, because he had made it (an odd reason)
too deep, and too affecting; there was another, also named Phrynicus, author of two tragedies: to these must
be added Alcaeus, Phormus, and Choeritas, together with Cephisodorus, an Athenian, who wrote the
"Amazon," and Apollophanes, supposed to have been the author of a tragedy named "Daulis," though Suidas
is of another opinion. Tragedy had, during the lives of these writers, probably made but a slow progress, and
received but very little culture and improvement; when at length the great Aeschylus arose, who, from this
rude and undigested chaos, created as it were a new world in the system of letters.
Poets, and perhaps epic poets, there might have been before Homer (the latter, who, in all probability, lived
within fifty years of the Fall of Troy—1250 B.C.). Dramatic writers there certainly were before
Aeschylus the former notwithstanding, we may, with the utmost propriety, style the inventor and father of
heroic poetry, and the latter of the ancient drama, which, before his time, does not appear to have had any
particular form but that of Pantomime, song, and the union of song and dance. Aeschylus first introduced
dialogue, that most essential part of tragedy, and by the addition of the second personage, threw the whole
fable into action, and restored the chorus to its ancient dignity.
Aeschylus having, like a tender parent, endowed his darling child with every mental accomplishment, seemed
resolved that no external ornaments should be wanting to render her universally amiable; he clothed her,
CHAPTER V. 21
therefore, in the most splendid habit, and bestowed upon her everything that Art could produce, to heighten
and improve her charms. Aeschylus, who being himself author, actor, and manager, took upon him the whole
conduct of the drama, and did not neglect any part of it; he improved the scenery and decorations, brought his
actors into a well constructed theatre, raised his heroes on the cothurnus, or buskin, invented the masks, and
introduced splendid habits with long trains, that gave an air of majesty and dignity to the performers.
From the time when Tragedy began to assume a regular form, we find her closely following the steps of epic
poetry; all the parts of epopée, or heroic poem, may be traced in tragedy, though, as Aristotle observes, all the
parts of tragedy are not to be found in the epopée; whence the partisans of the stage with some reason
conclude, that perfection in the former is more difficult to be attained than in the latter. Without entering into
a dispute, we may venture, however, to say that from Homer the tragedians drew the plan, construction, and
conduct of their fables, and not unfrequently, the fable itself; to him they applied for propriety of manners,
character, sentiment, and diction.
From this era then, we are to consider Tragedy as an elegant and noble structure, built according to the rules
of art, symmetry, and proportion; whose every part was in itself fair, firm, and compact—and at the
same time contributed to the beauty, utility, and duration of the whole edifice.
Sophocles and Euripides carefully studied the plan laid down by Aeschylus, and by their superior genius and
judgment, improved it in a short time to its highest state of perfection, from which it gradually declined to the
rise of the Roman Drama.
Aeschylus, Sophocles, and Euripides were the three great tragic poets; and from the works of these three
illustrious writers, and from them alone, we must draw all our knowledge of the ancient Greek Tragedy.
Comedy, like Tragedy, owes its origin to the union of music, song, dance, and Pantomime; Tragedy to the
dithyrambick, and Comedy to the phallica; and each of them (emulating Pantomime), began to form
themselves into dramatic imitations; each studied to adopt a measure suited to their purpose:—Tragedy,
the more lofty, chose the tetrameter; and comedy, which aimed at familiarity, the iambic. But, as the style of
tragedy improved, Nature herself, says Aristotle, directed the writers to abandon the capering tetrameter, and
to embrace that measure which was most accommodated to the purposes of dialogue; whence the iambic
became the common measure of both Tragedy and Comedy.
Sophocles brought on a third actor, which number was not exceeded in the Greek tragedies during the same
scene. Horace alludes to this, "nec quarta loqui persona laboret," (Let not a fourth person strive to speak): but
it was not observed in comedy. Players of second parts were obliged to speak so low as not to drown the voice
of the chief actor. Tyrants were always played by subalterns. The women were only dancers (and
Pantomimists). Female parts were performed by eunuchs.
On the Grecian stage, those performers who devoted themselves entirely to the Art of Miming originally came
from Sicily and southern Italy, though the exact period is difficult to determine with any degree of certainty.
The figures of tragic or comic actors were known by the long and strait sleeves which they wore. The servants
in comedy, below the dress with strait sleeves, had a short cassock with half-sleeves. That the characters
might be distinguished (a difficulty in this respect arising from the size of the theatres) parasites carried a
short truncheon; the rural deities, shepherds, and peasants, the crook; heralds and ambassadors, the caduceus;
kings, a long, straight sceptre; heroes, a club, etc. The tunic of tragic actors descended to the heels, and was
called palla. They generally carried a long staff or an erect sceptre. They who represented old men, leaned
upon a long and crooked staff.
Thespis—The Progress of Tragedy andComedy—Aeschylus—TheEpopée—Homer&mdash

22
The first Greek theatre at Athens (says Fosbroke, in his "Antiquities,") was a temporary structure of boards,
removed after the performances were closed. This fashion continued till the erection of the theatre of Bacchus,
at Athens, which served as a model for the others. The Greek theatre was no more than a concave sweep,
scooped out of the hollow side of a hill, generally facing the sea. The sweep was filled with seats, rising above
each other, and ascended by staircases, placed like the radii of a circle. This semi-circular form was adopted
not merely for convenience of vision, but for an aid to the sound. This range for spectators was called the
coilon or hollow. The area below was the conistra, or pit. There was no superstructure for a gallery, but
around the rim of the building were porticos, by which the spectators entered, and whither they could retire, if
it rained. The portico just about the highest corridor, or lobby, was denominated the cercys, and used by the
women. Where is now the orchestra, was a platform, called by that name; and here, among the Greeks, were
stationed the musicians; chorus and Mimes; among the Romans, the Emperor, Senate, and other persons of
quality. Seven feet above the orchestra, and eleven above the conistra, or pit, was the front stage, or
proscenium, upon which stood an altar to Apollo. Here the principal actors performed, and the site of the altar
was devoted to the dances (of the Mimes) and songs of the chorus. The part called the scena was in line with
the ornamental columns, upon the sides of the stage.
The ancient scenery at first consisted of mere boughs, but afterwards of tapestry, not painted canvas. The
Greek stage consisted of three parts, the scena, across the theatre, upon the line of the curtain in our theatres;
the proscenium, where the actors performed; and the post-scenium, the part behind the house,
before-mentioned. To form parts of the scenes there were prisms of framework, turning upon pivots, upon
each face of which was strained a distinct picture, one for tragedy, consisting of large buildings, with
columns, statues, and other corresponding ornaments; a second face, with houses, windows, and balconies, for
comedy; a third applied to farce, with cottages, grottoes, and rural scenes. There were the scenae versatiles of
Servius. Besides these, there were scenae ductiles, which drew backwards and forwards, and opened a view of
the house, which was built upon the stage, and contained apartments for machinery, or retirement for the
actors. As to the patterns of the scenes, in comedy, the most considerable building was in the centre; that on
the right side was a little less elevated, and that on the left generally represented an inn. In the satirical pieces
they had always a cave in the middle, a wretched cabin on the right, and on the left an old ruined temple, or
some landscape. In these representations perspective was observed for Vitruvius remarks (C. 8) that the rules
of it were invented and practised from the time of Aeschylus, by a painter named Agararchus, who has even
left a treatise upon it. After the downfall of the Roman Empire, these decorations of the stage were neglected,
till Peruzzi, a Siennese, who died in 1536, revived them.
There were three entries in front, and two on the sides; the middle entry (termed the Royal door) was always
that of the principal actor; thus, in tragedy, it was commonly the gate of a palace. Those on the right and left
were destined to the second-part players, and the two others, on the sides, one to people from the country, the
other to those from the harbour, or any public place.
Pollux informs us, that there were trap-doors for ghosts, furies, and the infernal deities. Some under the doors,
on one side, introduced the rural deities, and on the other the marine. The ascents or descents were managed
by cords, wheels, and counter-weights. Of these machines none were more common than those which
descended from heaven in the end of the play, in which the gods came to extricate the poet in the denouement.
The kinds were chiefly three; some conveyed the performer across the theatre in the air; by others, the gods
descended on the stage; and a third contrivance, elevated, or supported in the air, persons who seemed to fly,
from which accidents often happened. (It is from this that the well-known phrase "Deus ex machina" has its
origin.) As the ancient theatres were larger than ours, and unroofed, there was no wheel-work aloft, but the
performer was elevated by a sort of crane, of which the beam was above the stage; and turning upon itself,
whilst the counter-weight made the actor descend or ascend, caused him to describe curves, jointly composed
of the circular motion of the crane, and the vertical ascent. The anapesmata were cords for the sudden
appearance of furies, when fastened to the lowest steps; and to the ascension of rivers, when attached to the
stage. The ceraunoscopium was a kind of moveable tower, whence Jupiter darted lightning, supposed to be
Thespis—The Progress of Tragedy andComedy—Aeschylus—TheEpopée—Homer&mdash

23
the Greek fire, as in Ajax Oielus. The machine for thunder (bronton) was a brazen vase, concealed under the
stage, in which they rolled stones. Festus calls it the Claudian thunder, from Claudius Pulcher, the inventor.
The most dreadful machines were, however, the pegmata (a general term also for all the machines), which
first consisted of scaffolds in stories, &c. These first exhibited criminals fighting at the top, and then, dropping
to pieces, precipitated them to the lower story, to be torn to pieces by wild beasts. Sometimes they were for
vomiting flames, &c. The theologium was a place more elevated than the stage, where the gods stood and
spoke, and the machines which held them rested.
The seats of the spectators were divided into stories, each containing seven rows of seats, with two passages
(praecinctiones) around them above and below. Small staircases divided the seats into sections, called cunei,
and ended in a gate at the top, which communicated with passages (the vomitoriae) for admission.
CHAPTER VI.
Roman
Theatres—Description—"Deadheads"—Pantomime
in Italy—Livius Andronicus—Fabulae
Atellanae—Extemporal Comedy—Origin of the Masque,
Opera, and Vaudeville—Origin of the term
Histrionic—Etruscans—Popularity of Pantomime in
Italy—Pantomimists banished by Trajan—Nero as a
Mime—Pylades and Bathyllus—Subjects chosen for the
Roman Pantomimes—The Ballet—The Mimi and
Pantomimi—Archimimus—Vespasian—Harlequin—"Mr.
Punch"—Zany, how the word originated—Ancient
Masks—Lucian, Cassiodorus, and Demetrius in praise of
Pantomime—A celebrated Mima—Pantomimes denounced
by early writers—The purity of the English stage contrasted with
that of the Grecian and Roman—Female parts on the Grecian
and Roman stages—The principal Roman Mimas—The
origin of the Clown of the early English Drama.
The Roman theatres (continues Fosbroke) were of a similar D form. Two lofty arched doorways entered into
the pit. In front of the stage, which was very shallow, was a pew-like orchestra. The proscenium was very
narrow, and instead of a drop scene was the elisium, a house, narrow, with a kind of bow window front in the
centre, and a door on each side: for Pollux says that a house with two stories formed part of the stage, whence
old women and panders used to look down and peep about them. Within the house were apartments. Around
the back of the stage was a porticus. At Herculaneum, on a balustrade which divided the orchestra from the
stage, was found a row of statues, and on each side of the pulpitum, an equestrian figure. Below the theatre
CHAPTER VI. 24
(great and small) was a large square constructed, says Vitruvius, for the reception of the audience in bad
weather. It consisted of Doric columns, around an open area, forming an ample portico for this purpose, whilst
under it were arranged cellae, or apartments, amongst which were a soap manufactory, oil mill, corn mill, and
prison. An inner logia was connected with a suite of apartments. There was also an exedra, or recess.
Among the Romans, theatrical approbation was signified by an artificial musical kind of noise, made by the
audience to express satisfaction. There were three species of applause denominated from the different noises
made in them, viz.: Bombus, Imbrius, and Testae.
First, a confused din, made either by the hands or mouth. The second and third, by beating on a sort of
sounding vessel placed in the theatres for that purpose. Persons were instructed to give applause with
skill—and there were even masters who professed to teach the art. The proficients in this way let
themselves out for hire to the poets, actors, &c., and were so disposed as to support a loud applause. These
they called Laudicena. At the end of the play, a loud peal of applause was expected, and even asked of the
audience either by the chorus or by the person who spoke last. The formula was "Spectatore Claudite," or
"Valete et Plaudite." The applauders were divided into Chori, and disposed in theatres opposite to each other,
like the choristers in cathedrals, so that there was a kind of concert of applause. The free admission tickets
were small ivory death's heads, and specimens of these are to be seen in the Museum of Naples. From this
custom, it is stated, that we derive our word "Deadhead," as denoting one who has a free entrance to places of
amusement.
With the dawn of the Roman Empire, Pantomime, in Italy, is first authentically mentioned. The Emperor
Augustus always displayed great favour to the Art, and even by some writers he has been credited with being
the originator of Pantomime. This, of course, as we have seen, is impossible, and to use a familiar and trite
saying, the Pantomimic Art is "as old as the hills" themselves. Again, Bathyllus and Pylades (both freed
slaves, the former born in Cilicia, and the latter came from Alexandria), and Hylas, the principal exponents of
Pantomime during the reign of Augustus, have also been credited with the honour of originating Pantomime.
The early Roman entertainments only consisted of the military and sacred dances, and the scenes in the circus.
With the advent of the arts of Greece the austerity hitherto practised by the Romans, which had arisen, says
Duray, "Much more from poverty than conviction," for "Two or three generations had sufficed to change a
city which had only known meagre festivities and rustic delights into the home of revelry and pleasure."
With the Romans, in their Pantomimic entertainments, the whole gamut of the emotions were gone through.
When the Greek drama was brought into Rome by Livius Andronicus, the Fabulae Atellanae, or Laudi
Osci—derived from the town of Atella, in Campania, between Capua and Naples—was still
employed to furnish the Interludes, and just in a similar way as the Satyra Extemporal Interludes supplied the
Grecian stage. None of these Atellan Farces have been committed to us, but Cicero, in a letter to his friend
Papyrius Paetus, speaks of them as the "More delicate burlesque of the old Atellan Farces." From them also,
we derive the Extemporal Comedy, or Comedia del' Arte of Italy (afterwards to be noted), with its characters,
Harlequin, Clown, Pierrot, and the like, associated with English and Italian Pantomime, and the progenitor
also of all those light forms of entertainment known as the Masque, the Opera, and the Vaudeville. On English
dramatic literature the Italian Extemporal Comedies and their Pantomimical characters have also had a
considerable amount of influence.
Livy mentions that actors were sent for (circa 364 B.C.) from Etruria, who, without verses or any action
expressive of verses, danced not ungracefully, after the Tuscan manner to the flute. In process of time the
Roman youth began to imitate these dancers intermixing raillery with unpolished verses, their gestures
corresponding with the sense of the words. Thus were these plays received at Rome, and being improved and
refined by frequent performance the Roman actors acquired the name of Histriones, from the Etruscan Hister,
RomanTheatres—Description—"Deadheads"—Pantomimein Italy—Livius Andronicus&md

25
meaning a dancer or a stage player. (From this we obtain our words histrion and histrionic). But their dialogue
did not consist of unpremeditated and coarse jests in such rude verses as were used by the Fescennini, but of
satires, accompanied with music set to the flute, recited with suitable gestures. After satires, which had
afforded the people subject of coarse mirth and laughter, were, by this regulation, reduced to form and acting,
by degrees became an art, the Roman youth left it to players by profession, and began, as formerly, to act
farces at the end of their regular pieces. These dramas were called Exodia, and were generally woven with the
Atellanae Comedies. These were borrowed from the Osci, and were always acted by the Roman youth.
Tacitus speaks of Atellanae Comedies written in the spirit and language of the Osci having been acted in his
time.
It is thought that the Etruscans possessed histories, poems, and dramas, and, if these, then certainly they knew
the Pantomimic Art, out of which, in all probability, their dramatic entertainments grew. To the Etruscans the
Romans owe their early civilization.
The Etruscan era is supposed to have commenced about 1044 B.C., and we are told that the Etruscans shared
with the Greeks, and the Phoenicians, the maritime supremacy of the Mediterranean. In the sepulchral
chambers of the Necropolis of Tarquinii, which extends for many miles, there are several scenes painted in the
archaic style by the Etruscans, representing the Chase, the Circus, and Dancing Girls.
Soon after its innovation among the Romans, Pantomime spread all over Italy and the provinces. So attractive
did it become in Rome, and so popular, that Tiberius issued a decree forbidding the knights and nobles to
frequent their houses of entertainment, or to be seen walking in the streets with them. Trajan also oppressed
and banished the Pantomimists. Under Caligula, however, they were received with great favour, and Aurelius
made them priests of Apollo. Nero, who carried everything to the extremity of foolishness, was not content in
patronising the Pantomimes, but must needs assist, and appear himself, as a Mimi. Here again, in Nero,
another claimant as the author of Pantomime has been put forward.
"So great (observes Gaston Vuillier, in his 'History of Dancing,') was the admiration for Pylades and Bathyllus
that the theatrical supporters clothed themselves in different liveries, and broils in the public streets were of
frequent occurrence." "The rivalries of Pylades and Bathyllus," says De Laulnaye, "occupied the Romans as
much as the gravest affairs of state. Every citizen was a Bathyllian or a Pyladian." Augustus reproved Pylades
on one occasion for his quarrels with Bathyllus. The Mime retorted, "It is well for you that the people are
engrossed by our disputes; their attention is thus diverted from your actions." A bold retort, but it shows how
important these Mimes were. The banishment of Pylades brought about an insurrection, and the Emperor had
to recall him.
Cassius attributes the disgrace of Pylades to the intrigues of Bathyllus, Suetonius to his effrontery; for on one
occasion, when acting Hercules, annoyed by the criticism of the spectators, he tore off his mask, and shouted
to them: "Fools, I am acting a madman." They thought his gestures too extravagant. Another time he shot off
arrows amongst the spectators. Amongst other privileges extended by the Emperor Augustus to the Mimis was
being exempt from magisterial control and immunity from military serving.
The subjects chosen for the Roman Pantomimes, like those of the Grecian mysteries, from which they
doubtless were borrowed, were of a Mythological description, and they were of such a nature that the
audience could follow them easily, even if they were not already previously acquainted with them. Between
the Roman Pantomime, and the Western ballet d'action, there is hardly any difference. The Romans always
liked to see their stages well peopled; and to help in the action of their Pantomimes, a chorus accompanied
with music, formed part of the entertainment. The Mimis and Mimas, like the ballet of the present day,
provided the dances in addition to their Pantomimic Art of posing and posturing.

26
Mr. Isaac Disraeli, in his work, "Curiosities of Literature," edited by the late Earl of Beaconsfield, thus
distinguishes between the Mimi and the Pantomimi of the Ancients. The Mimi were an impudent race of
buffoons who excelled in mimicry, and like our domestic fools, were admitted into convivial parties to
entertain the guests. Their powers enabled them to perform a more extraordinary office; for they appear to
have been introduced into funerals to mimic the person, and even the language of the deceased. Suetonius
describes an archimimus accompanying the funeral of Vespasian. This archimimus performed his part
admirably, not only representing the person, but imitating, according to custom, ut est mos, the manners and
language of the living Emperor. He contrived a happy stroke at the prevailing foible of Vespasian, when he
enquired the cost of all this funeral pomp—"Ten million of sesterces!" On this he observed that if they
would give him but a hundred thousand they might throw his body into the Tiber.
The Pantomimi were quite of a different class. They were tragic actors, and usually mute; they combined the
arts of gesture, music, and dances of the most impressive character. Their silent language has often drawn
tears by the pathetic emotions they excited; "Their very nod speaks, their hands talk, and their fingers have a
voice," says one of their admirers.
These Pantomimists seem to have been held in great honour. The tragic and the comic masks were among the
ornaments of the sepulchral monuments of an Archmime and a Pantomimi. Montfaucon conjectures that they
formed a select fraternity.
The parti-coloured hero (Harlequin), with every part of his dress, has been drawn out of the greatest wardrobe
of antiquity; he was a Roman Mime. Harlequin is described with his shaven head (rasis capitibus); his sooty
face (fuligine faciem abducti); his flat unshod feet, (planipedes), and his patched coat of many colours, (Mimi
centunculo). Even Pulcinello, whom we familiarly call "Punch," may receive, like other personages of no
great importance, all his dignity from antiquity; one of his Roman ancestors having appeared to an antiquary's
visionary eye in a bronze statue; more than one erudite dissertation authenticates the family likeness; the nose
long, prominent and hooked; the staring goggle eyes; the hump at his back, and at his breast; in a word, all the
character which so strongly marks the Punch race, as distinctly as whole dynasties have been featured by the
Austrian lip and the Bourbon nose.
The genealogy of the whole family is confirmed by the general term which includes them all: in English,
Zany; in Italian, Zanni; in the Latin, Sannio; and a passage in "Cicero De Oratore," paints Harlequin and his
brother gesticulators after the life; the perpetual trembling motion of their limbs, their ludicrous and flexible
gestures, and all the mimicry of their faces: "Quid enim potest tam ridiculum quam Sannio esse? Qui ore
vultu, imitandis motibus, voce, denique corpore ridetur ipso." Lib II., Sect. 51. ("For what has more of the
ludicrous than Sannio? Who, with his mouth, his face, imitating every motion with his voice, and, indeed,
with all his body, provokes laughter.")
The Latin Sannio was changed by the Italians into (as Ainsworth explains) Zanni, as, in words like Smyrna
and Sambuco, they change the s into z, which gives Zmyrna and Zambuco, and hence we derive our word
Zany. The word is, however, originally obtained from the Greek Sannos (observes Quadrio), from whence the
Latins derived their Sannio.
From the size of the ancient theatres it was not possible to notice the visage of the actors, and this was one, but
not the only reason, why masks were adopted. The Ancients did not like a character to be attempted, to which
a proper appropriation was not annexed, and these masks were so contrived, that the profile on one side
exhibited chagrin, and on the other serenity, or whatever other passion was most required. The actor thus,
according to the part he was playing, presented the side of the mask best suited to the passage which he was
reciting. The large mouths of these masks were presumed to have contained some bronze instrument suited to
assist the voice, upon the principle of the speaking trumpet; for the mask was wider, and the recitation in
tragedy much louder than in comedy, so that the voice might be heard all over the theatre. The masks of the

27
dancers were of regular features.
By some it has been contended that these masks covered both the head and the shoulders under the supposed
idea that when the head was thus enlarged it would throw the whole body into symmetry when raised upon
stilts. It has, also, been argued that the masks for some of the characters were made of gold-beaters skin, or
some transparent substance just covering the face so that the facial muscles could be seen through it, and the
eyes, mouth, and ears being left uncovered. These masks, however, delineated very carefully the features of
the character that were to be represented. Something not unlike the huge Pantomime masks of a hideous and
frightful shape that we sometimes see in our present day Pantomimes must have appeared, especially those
that covered the head and shoulders of the Mimis in the days of the Romans. Those that were just of the size
of the face in all probability were fantastic and picturesque; and the third and remaining species of mask made
of a transparent substance could hardly have been very effective.
Mr. Wright tells us, in his book on the Chester Mystery plays (which work I shall again refer to later on), that
masks were used in the Mystery series of plays acted in England during the thirteenth and fourteenth
centuries.
Julius Pollux is still more ample in his account of theatrical masks used in Tragedy, Satyr, and Comedy.
Niobe weeping, Medea furious, Ajax astonished, and Hercules enraged. In Comedy, the slave, the parasite, the
clown, the captain, the old woman, the harlot, the austere old man, the debauched young man, the prodigal,
the prudent young woman, the matron, and the father of a family, were all constantly characterised by
particular masks.
Lucian and the other writers of the Augustan era, have handed down to us sufficient information to show how
Pantomime in Rome was so highly thought of. Cassiodorous, speaking of them, says:—"Men whose
eloquent hands had a tongue, as it were, on the tip of each finger—men who spoke while they were
silent, and knew how to make a recital without opening their mouths—men, in short, whom
Polyhymnia had formed in order to show that there was no necessity for articulation in order to convey our
thoughts." Demetrius, a cynic philosopher, laughed at the Romans for permitting so strange an entertainment;
but having been, with much difficulty, prevailed upon to be present at the representation of one of them, he
was confounded with wonder. The story represented was that of Mars and Venus, the whole performed by a
single actor, who described the fable in dumb show. At length the philosopher, wrought up to the highest pitch
of admiration, exclaimed, "That the actor had no occasion for a tongue, he spoke so well with his hands."
Of one Pontus, who had come on a visit to Nero, we are told that he was present at a performance, in the
course of which a favourite Mime gave a representation of the Labours of Hercules. The Mime's gestures
were so precise that he could follow the action without the slightest hesitation. Being struck by the
performance, on taking leave he begged Nero to give him the actor, explaining that there was a barbarous tribe
adjoining his dominions, whose language no one could learn, and that Pantomime could express his intentions
to them so faithfully by gestures that they would at once understand.
The dress of the performers of Pantomime was made to reveal, and not to conceal, their figures. After the
second century women began to act in their representations, and even down to the sixth century we find them
associating themselves with Pantomime, and mention is made of a celebrated Mima, who was ultimately
raised to the imperial throne. Through the lewdness of the Mimis and mimas in Pantomime, their dress, or
rather lack of dress, Pantomimes were denounced, not only by the early Christian writers, but also by some of
the Pagan writers, like Juvenal, as being very prejudicial to morality.
It has, however, always been a favourite topic of the Prynne's, the Jeremy Collier's and the Dr. Style's, and
such like opponents of the theatre, to contrast the English stage with the purity of the Grecian and Roman
Theatres. Now, without stopping to enquire whether this has any particular connection with the subject of

28
their dissertations, or whether it is not in fact quite irrelevant to the question, it is impossible not to remark the
crass ignorance which these assertions display of the manners and customs of the theatres of either the Greeks
or the Romans. Without wearying the reader by entering into a long discussion upon the subject, it will be
sufficient to recall certain passages in Aristophanes, Xenophon, Plautus, and Terence to induce them to
hesitate in assenting to such vague assertions of the purity of either the Grecian or Roman dramatic writers.
William Prynne, the English Puritan writer, in his violent attack on the stage in the "Histrio-Mastix" or
"Players Scourge"—which book, by the way, for some unfavourable comments therein on the Queen of
Charles I., and the ladies of her Court, for attending theatrical representations, was debarred his rooms (he was
a barrister), by the Court of Star Chamber, sentenced to be imprisoned for life, fined £5,000, committed to the
Tower, placed in the pillory, both ears cut off, and his book burnt by the common hangman; yet after
undergoing all these pains and penalties, he published a recantation of all that he had previously written in his
"Histrio-Mastix"—says "It seems that the Grecian actors did now and then to refresh the spectators,
bring a kind of cisterne on the stage, wherein naked women did swim and bathe themselves between the acts
and scenes; which wicked, impudent, and execrable practice the holy father Chrysostom doth sharpely and
excellently declaime against."
Xenophon mentions the tale of "Bacchus and Ariadne," Pantomimically played, and Martial tells us he saw
the whole story of "Pasiphae," minutely represented on the stage of the Mimis, and Plautus, in his epilogue to
"Casina," has—
"Nunc vos aequim est, manibus meritis,

Meritam mercedem dare.
Qui faxit, clam uxorem, ducat scortum
Semper quod volet.
Verum qui non manibus clare, quantum
Potent, plauserit,
Ei, pro scorto, supponetur hircus unctus nantea."
On the Roman stage female parts were represented in tragedy by men, is ascertained (says Malone) by one of
Cicero's letters to Atticus, and by a passage in Horace. Horace mentions, however, a female performer called
Arbuscula, but as we find from his own authority men personated women on the Roman stage, she was
probably an Emboliariae. Servius calls her a Mima, or one who danced in the Pantomimic dances, and which
seems more probable, as she is mentioned by Cicero, who says the part of Andromache was played by a male
performer on the very day Arbuscula also performed.
The principal Roman Mimas were:—Arbuscula, Thymele, Licilia, Dionysia, Cytheris, Valeria, and
Cloppia.
In the satirical interludes of the Grecian stage, and the Fabulae Atellanae of the Roman theatres, the Exodiarii
and Emboliariae of the Mimes, were the remote progenitors (says Malone) of the Vice or Devil, and the
Clown of our English Mystery plays, the latter series of plays being the origin of the drama of this country.
The exact conformity between our Clown and the Exodiarii and Emboliariae of the Roman stage is
ascertained by that passage in Pliny—"Lucceia Mima centum annis in scena pronuntiavit. Galeria,
Copiola, Emboliariae, reducta est in scenam: annum certissimum quartum agens," is thus translated by an
English author, Philemon Holland, "Lucceia, a common Vice in a play, followed the stage, and acted
thereupon 100 yeeres. Such another Vice that plaied the foole, and made sporte between whiles in interludes,
named Galeria Copiola, was brought to act upon the stage when she was in the 104th yeere of her age." We
shall, in another chapter, return to the Vice, or Clown.

29
CHAPTER VII.
Introduction of the Roman Pantomimic Art into Britain—First

English reference to the word Pantomime—The fall of the
Roman Empire—The sacred play—Cornish
Amphitheatres—Pantomimical and Lyrical elements in the
sacrifice of the Mass—Christian banishment of the
Mimis—Penalties imposed by the Church—St. Anthony on
Harlequin and Punch—Vandenhoff—what we owe to the
Mimis.
With the advent of Julius Caesar and the conquest of Britain by the Romans, about the year 52 B.C., we have,
in all probability, the first introduction of the Roman Pantomimic Art into this country. Inasmuch as we have
it upon the authority of history that Caesar travelled with his Mimes, and it is, therefore, not improbable that
they came into Britain with him. England, then, during the occupancy of the Romans, must have known the
Dramatic Art, or else (as Dibdin observes) Pacuvius, Accius, and Livius Andronicus were ignorant of it.
Martial tells us that it did, and so does Boadicea, so that we have not only Roman authorities for it, but also
British.
The word "Pantomime" could not, I may say here, have been Anglicised earlier than sometime during the
seventeenth century. Dr. Johnson's earliest example is from "Hudibras"—
"Not that I think those Pantomimes,

Who vary action with the times,
Are less ingenious in their art
Than those who duly act one part."
Bacon and Ben Jonson use the Latin Pantomimi—"Here be certain Pantomimi that will represent the
voices of players." Again in the "Masque of Love's Triumph," etc., 1630, "After the manner of the old
Pantomimi they dance over a distracted Comedy of Love."
The fall of the Roman Empire and the progress of Christianity in Europe sounded the death knell of Paganism
and its attributes, of which Pantomime was deemed to be one, owing to the bad odour in which this form of
entertainment had got to during the last days of the Empire. Notwithstanding this the church was only too glad
to avail itself of Pantomime as a vehicle to portray before the world at large, and in order to turn attention to
the great moral truths to be deduced from the death of Him on Calvary Hill. These exhibitions of religious
subjects, in the form of tableaux vivants, took place in the churches, and, having regard to the sacred edifices
in which they were given, they were, especially in the beginning, I conjecture, performed in dumb show,
without any dialogue. Afterwards dialogue was introduced, and they began to be, not only held in the
churches, but also in the church-yards, the streets, and in booths.
It is true the sacred play was not a new institution, as one is said to be mentioned about the time of the Fall of
Jerusalem. In Cornwall, plays were given in the ancient times in the open air, after the fashion of the Roman
Amphitheatre, with the dialogue in the Cymric tongue. Pantomimical performances might also have been
CHAPTER VII. 30
given in those open-air theatres by the Romans.
Perhaps no better example of the early Sacred Drama I can give, and which is still with us, and performed
daily, is the sacrifice of the Mass in all Roman Catholic Churches throughout the length and breadth of the
world. In the Mass we have a dramatic action pantomimically presented, in part aided by lyrical and epical
elements. I will not, however, pursue this portion of my subject further, save than to add that at the Catholic
Churches' festivals, especially during Holy Week or Passion Week, what I have mentioned of the Mass
becomes at these times marked in even a greater degree.
With the decline and fall of the Roman Empire, the Mimis became wanderers on the face of the earth, only
appearing at festivals and the like, when they were wanted, and returning to their haunts as mysteriously as
they came.
In the fourth century A.D. they were excluded from the benefit of the rites of the Church, and even those who
visited their entertainments, instead of churches, on the Sundays and holidays, were excommunicated. The
Theodosian creed provided that the actors were not to have the sacraments administered to them save when
death was imminent, and then only that, in case of recovery, their calling should be renounced.
In the second century one of the Fathers of the Church wrote a special treatise against plays (Tertulian De
Spectaculis), in which he asks those who will not renounce them "Whether the God of truth, who hates all
falsehood, can be willing to receive into His kingdom those whose features and hair, whose age and sex,
whose sighs and laughter, love and anger, are all feigned. He promises them a tragedy of their own when, in
the day of Judgment, they shall be consigned to everlasting suffering."
However, the church was not always against the stage, even in those early times, as St. Thomas Aquinas says
that "The office of the player as being serviceable for the enlivenment of men, and as not being blameworthy
if the player leads an upright life." Both Saints Thomas Aquinas and Anthony supported the stage, the latter
only stipulating that the character of Harlequin should not be represented by a clergyman, nor that Punch
should be exhibited in church.
It is one of the most remarkable things that, despite the bitterness, hostility, and deadly enmity that has been
levelled at the stage, and its players termed "Rogues and Vagabonds" from time immemorial, how it has lived
through it all. In connection with this how the lines of that great actor, Vandenhoff, occurs to me, a few of
which, with the reader's permission, I subjoin.
"The drama's now a great established fact,

That can't be blink'd, ignored how'er attack'd
By vain abuse or angry prejudice;
The time's gone by when playing was a vice;
When bigots mark'd the actor with a ban,
(Tho' saintly crowds to hear his accents ran),
Denied him sacred rite and hallowed grave—
Filching from God the soul he made to save—
And, for the pleasure which his life had giv'n
On earth, refused him dead, a place in heav'n.
No! wiser days bring gentler feelings in,
And 'Nature's touches makes the whole world kin'."
By degrees the Mimis, or mummers, with their fellows, spread themselves all over Europe. The humbler of the
craft, in fact it might be said of them all, as Othello's occupation had (for them) long since been gone, strolled
from castle to castle, from village to town, and earning their livelihood as best they could. To these wandering
Introduction of the Roman Pantomimic Art into Britain—FirstEnglish reference to the word Pantomime&mdash
31
Bohemians we owe such traditions of the drama that survived with them into succeeding ages; and to them
also we are indebted for keeping alive by inculcating unto others the Art of Pantomimus, when in the heyday
of its popularity in the Roman Empire.
CHAPTER VIII.
Pantomime in the English Mystery or Miracle Plays and

Pageants—A retrospect of the Early Drama—Mysteries
on Biblical events—Chester, Coventry, York, and Towneley
Mystery Plays—Plays in Churches—Traces of the
Mystery Play in England in the Nineteenth Century—Mystery
Plays on the Continent—The Chester series of
Plays—The Devil or Clown and the Exodiarii and Emboliariae of the
Ancient Mimes.
It is presumed that, not only were the early sacred plays acted in dumb-show, but that the Miracle or
Mysteries of Religion series of plays—which grew out of the sacred play—also the Pageants in
the beginning, and for long afterwards were acted in this wise. Percy, in his "Reliques of Ancient English
Poetry," also takes this view. He says:—"They were (the Mysteries) probably a kind of dumb show,
intermingled, it may be, with a few short speeches, at length they grew into regular scenes of connected
dialogues, formally divided into acts and scenes." Colley Cibber has: "It has been conjectured that the actors
of the Mysteries of Religion were mummers, a word signifying one who makes and disguises himself to play
the fool without speaking. They were dressed in an antic manner, dancing, mimicking, and showing postures."
Mr. Wright also observes (in his work on the Mystery Plays of Chester, published by the Shakespearean
Society) that the "chief effect seems to have been caused by the dumb show."
Before dealing with the Mysteries, and as perhaps a kind of retrospect, let us have a look what Wharton has to
say of the early drama. "Trade," he says (in the early centuries) "was carried on by means of fairs, which
lasted several days. Charlemagne established many great marts of this sort in France, as did William the
Conqueror and his Norman successors in England. The merchants, who frequented these fairs in numerous
caravans and companies, employed every art to draw the people together. They were, therefore, accompanied
by jugglers, minstrels, and buffoons (i.e., Pantomimists), who were no less interested in giving their
attendance and exercising their skill on these occasions. Few large towns existed, no public spectacles or
popular amusements were established; and as the sedentary pleasures of domestic life and private society were
yet unknown, the fair time was the season for diversion. In proportion as the shows were attended and
encouraged, they began to be set off with new decorations and improvements; and the arts of buffoonery
being rendered still more attractive by extending their circle of exhibition, acquired an importance in the eyes
of the people. By degrees the Clergy, observing that the entertainments of dancing, music, and mimicry
exhibited at these annual celebrations made the people less religious by promoting idleness and a love of
festivity, proscribed these sports and excommunicated the performers."
CHAPTER VIII. 32
Mystery plays were afterwards divided into three classes, though the generic term Mysteries, meaning all
three, is generally used. In the Mysteries, Biblical events were principally used; Miracle plays were obtained
from the legends of the saints; and the last, Moralities, allegorical stories of a moral character not essentially
taken from the Bible, or from the legends of the saints, comprised the third heading. The Mysteries were for
several centuries known on the Continent before they were performed in England. The earliest Mystery play
known to have been acted in England was at Dunstable about the year 1110. It was probably in Latin, and
composed by a Norman monk.
It is a peculiarity of the English Mystery plays that they were combined into a series of plays on the Old and
New Testament; and in which the whole course of Divine Providence, from the Creation to the Day of
Judgment, is set before the spectator. Four noted groups of plays were the Chester, the Towneley, Coventry,
and York Mystery plays. The Chester plays began on Whit Monday, and, continued till the following
Wednesday. Permission to perform them, in the beginning of their institution, had twice to be asked of the
Pope. They consisted of 24 plays, and were almost annually performed till 1577. Before the suppression of the
monasteries the Grey Friars at Coventry were celebrated for their exhibitions of the Mystery plays usually on
Corpus Christi. The Towneley, or Woodkirk group of plays were acted at Woodkirk, about four miles from
Wakefield, and they are of a style that may be likened to the times of Henry VI., or Edward IV. Until the
Mystery play fell into disuse, the trading companies and guilds seem principally to have maintained them. The
mixture of secular with ecclesiastical players helped to change the characters of the English plays and to
provoke censure, which began to be levelled at them from the beginning of the thirteenth century.
The practise of performing plays in sacred edifices in England, had not ceased in 1542, when Bishop Bonner
prohibited them in his diocese. However, so late as 1572, it appears that Interludes were occasionally
performed in Churches.
Collier speaks of a kind of Mystery, or Miracle play, exhibited in the last century, with the characters of
Herod, Beelzebub, and others. In 1838 Sandy mentions of having seen the play of "St. George and the
Dragon," presented in the Northern and Western parts of the Kingdom, or rather Queendom, as Victoria had
just ascended the throne. I myself remember quite well, within a couple of decades ago, what was probably at
the time a remnant of the old Mystery play presented in a rural part of Lancashire by men in a fantastic garb,
and termed by the country folk, "Paste-eggers." They generally appeared about Good Friday and on to Easter;
and their performance consisted of a mixture of music (?), songs, and sometimes not over choice language.
This custom does not now exist where I write of, but it may do—though I very much doubt—in
some rural parts. On the Continent, as at Oberammergau, Mystery plays are still enacted.
The following account of the Chester Mysteries may be of interest, and appears (says Warton) in the Harleian
Catalogue. M.S. Harl. 2013, etc. Exhibited at Chester in the year 1327 at the expense of the different trading
companies of that city. "The Fall of Lucifer," by the tanners; "The Creation," by the drapers; "The Deluge," by
the dyers; "Abraham, Melchizedeck and Lot," by the barbers; "Moses, Balak and Balaam," by the cappers;
"The Salutation and the Nativity," by the wrights (carpenters); "The Shepherds feeding the Flocks by Night,"
by the painters and glaziers; "The Three Kings," by the vintners; "The oblation of the Three Kings," by the
mercers; "The Killing of the Holy Innocents," by the goldsmiths; "The Purification," by the blacksmiths; "The
Temptations," by the butchers; "The Blindmen and Lazarus," by the glovers; "Jesus and the Lepers," by the
cowesarys; "Christ's Passion," by the bowyers, fletchers and ironmongers; "Descent into Hell," by the cooks
and inn-keepers; "Resurrection," by the skinners; "Ascension," by the taylors; "The Election of St. Matthias,"
"Sending of the Holy Ghost," etc., by the fishmongers; "Anti-christ," by the clothiers; and "The Day of
Judgment," by the websters (weavers). The reader will perhaps smile at some of these combinations. This is
the substance and order of the former part of the play. God enters, creating the world, he breathes life into
Adam, leads him into Paradise, and opens his side while sleeping. Adam and Eve appear naked, and not
ashamed; and the old Serpent enters, lamenting his fall. He converses with Eve. She eats part of the forbidden
fruit, and gives part to Adam. They propose, according to the stage directions, to make themselves,
Pantomime in the English Mystery or Miracle Plays andPageants—A retrospect of the Early Drama—My
33
subligacula a folis quibus tegamus pudenda, cover their nakedness with leaves and converse with God. God's
curse. The Serpent exits, hissing. They are driven from Paradise by four angels, and the Cherubim with a
flaming sword. Adam appears digging the ground, and Eve spinning. Their children, Cain and Abel, enter, the
former kills his brother. Adam's lamentation. Cain is banished, etc., etc.
Adam and Eve, in the "altogether," so to speak, were acted like this as late as the sixteenth century. In a play
called "The Travails of the Three English Brothers," acted in 1607, there occurs this:—
"Many idle toyes, but the old play that Adam and Eve acted in bare action under the figge tree draws most of
the gentlemen."
An Account of the Proclamation of the Mystery plays, acted in "Ye Citye on ye Dee," may prove of interest,
and the copy of which I subjoin is taken from the Harleian M.S. No. 2013.
"The proclamation for Whitsone playes made by Wm. Newell, Clarke of the Pendice, 24 Hen. 8. Wm. Snead
2nd yere Maior."
"For as much as auld tyme, not only for the augmentation and increese of the holy and catholick faith of our
Saviour Jesu Christ, and to exort the mindes of comon people to good devotion and holsome doctrine thereof,
but also for the comonwelth and prosperity of this citty, a play and declaration of divers storyes of Bible
beginning with the Creation and fall of Lucifer, and ending with the generall Judgment of the world, to be
declared and played in Whitsonne weeke, was devised and made by one Sir Henry Frances, sometyme
moonck of this monastrey disolved, who obtayning and gat of Clemant, then Bushop of Rome, a 1000 dayes
of pardon, and of the Bushop of Chester at that tyme 40 dayes of pardon, graunted from thensforth to every
person resorting, in peaceable manner with good devotion, to heare and see the sayd playes, from time to time
as oft as they shall be played within the said citty (and that every person or persons disturbing the sayd playes
in the maner wise to be acused by the authority of the sayd pope Clemant's bulls, untill such tyme as he or
they be absolved thereof) which playes were devised to the honor of God by John Arnway, then maior of this
citty of Chester, his brethren and whole cominalty thereof, to be brought forth, declared, and played, at the
cost and charges of the craftesman and occupations of the sayd citty, which hitherto have from tyme to tyme
used and performed the same accordingly.
"Wherefore Mr. maior, in the King's name, stratly chargeth and commandeth that every person and persons of
what estate, degree, or condition so ever he or they be resorting to the sayd playes, do use themselves
peaciblie, without making any assault, affray, or other disturbance, whereby the same playes shall be
disturbed, and that no manner of person or persons, whiche so ever he or they be, do use or wear any
unlawfull weapons within the precinct of the sayd citty during the tyme of the sayd playes (not only upon
payn of cursing by authority of the sayd Pope Clemant's bulls but also) upon payn of imprisonment of their
bodyes, and making fine to the King at Mr. maior's pleasure."
Archdeacon Rogers, who died in 1595, and saw the Whitsuntide plays performed at Chester in the preceding
year, gives the following account of the mode of exhibition:—
"The time of the yeare they were played was on Monday, Tuesday, and Wenseday in Whitson weake. The
maner of these playes weare every company had his pagiant, or parte, which pagiants weare a high scafolde
with 2 rowmes, a higher and a lower, upon 4 wheeles. In the lower they apparelled themselves, and in the
higher rowme they played, being all open on the tope, that all behoulders might heare and see them. The
places where they played them was in every streete. They begane first at the abay gates, and when the first
pagiante was played, it was wheeled to the high crosse before the mayor, and soe to every streete; and soe
every streete had a pagiant playinge before them at one time, till all the pagiantes for the daye appoynted
weare played, and when one pagiant was neere ended, word was broughte from streete to streete that soe they
Pantomime in the English Mystery or Miracle Plays andPageants—A retrospect of the Early Drama—My
34
mighte come in place thereof exceedinge orderlye, and all the streetes have their pagiantes afore them all at
one time playeinge togeather; to se which playes was greate resorte, and also scafoldes and stages made in the
streetes in those places where they determined to playe their pagiantes."
Strutt has the following description of the Mystery plays:—"In the early dawn of literature, and when
the sacred Mysteries were the only theatrical performances, what is now called the stage did then consist of
three several platforms or stages, raised one above another; on the uppermost sat the Pater Caelestis,
surrounded with his angels; on the second appeared the holy saints and glorified men; and the last and lowest
were occupied by mere men who had not passed through this life to the regions of eternity. On one side of this
lowest platform was the resemblance of a dark pitchy cavern, from whence issued appearance of fire and
flames; and when it was necessary the audience were treated with hideous yellings and noises, as imitations of
the howlings and cries of the wretched souls tormented by the relentless demons. From this yawning cave the
devils themselves constantly ascended, to delight and instruct the spectators; to delight because they were
usually the greatest jesters and buffoons that then appeared; and to instruct for that they treated the wretched
mortals who were delivered to them with the utmost cruelty, warning thereby all men carefully to avoid the
falling into the clutches of such hardened and relentless spirits."
It is interesting to note that Hell was imitated by a whale's open jaws, behind which a fire was lighted, in such
a way, however, so as not to injure the "damned," who had to pass into its gaping mouth. The performer who
impersonated God had not only his face but also the hair of his wig gilded. Christ was dressed in a long
sheep's skin. The Devil, or Vice (the Exodiarii and Emboliariae of the ancient Mimis), was easily recognisable
by his horns and his tail, whilst his beard was of a bright red colour, to indicate the flames of the region in
which he dwelt. Judas also wore a wig of a fiery hue, and, after being hung, had sometimes to do the "cock
crowing," as some old accounts of the York Mysteries show.
It appears to have been customary for the Devil to appear before the audience with a cry of "Ho! ho! ho!"
somewhat similar to the ejaculations of the Pantomime Clown in after years. (See Gammer Gurton's Needle,
Act II., Sc. 3, and "The Devil is an Ass," by Ben Jonson, Act I., Sc. 1.) The following passage occurs in "Wily
Beguiled," 1606. "Tush! feare not the dodge; I'll rather put on my flashing red nose, and my flaming face, and
come wrapped in a calfe's skin, and cry 'Ho! ho! ho!'" Again, "I'll put me on my great carnation nose, and
wrap me in a rousing calf's-skin suit, and come like some hob-goblin, or some Devil ascended from the grisly
pit of hell, and like a scarebabe make him take to his legs; I'll play the Devil, I warrant ye."
CHAPTER IX.
The Clown or Fool of the early English

Drama—Moralities—The Interlude—The rise of
English Tragedy and Comedy—"Dumb Shews" in the Old
Plays—Plays suppressed by Elizabeth—A retrospect.
In the sixth chapter of this work, in quoting Malone, I have mentioned that the Exodiarii and Emboliariae of
the Mimis were the remote progenitors of the Clown of the Mystery Plays of this country. Now let us see what
were the duties the Clown fulfilled in the old plays of this country, and also briefly of the others who were
CHAPTER IX. 35
known under the generic name of Clown or fool.
In the early drama the Clown was a personage of no mean importance and whose duty was to preserve the
stage from vacancy by amusing the audience with extemporary buffoonery, and also at the end of the
performance. And, as Heywood, in his "History of Women" (1624), says "By his mimic gestures to breed in
the less capable mirth and laughter." On these occasions, it was usual to descant, in a humourous style, on
various subjects proposed to him by the spectators; but they were more commonly entertained with what was
termed a jig: this was a ludicrous composition in rhyme, sung by the Clown, accompanied by his pipe and
tabor. In these jigs there were sometimes more actors than one, and the most unbounded license of tongue was
allowed; the pith of the matter being usually some scurrilous exposure of persons among, or well known to the
audience. Here again history repeats itself in this once more, and in imitation of the satirical interludes of the
Grecian stage and the Atellans and Mimis of the Roman theatres.
The practice of putting the fools and Clowns in requisition between the acts and scenes (observes Francis
Douce), and after the play was finished, to amuse the spectators with their tricks, may be traced to the Greek
and Roman theatres; and their usages being preserved in the middle ages, wherever the Roman influence had
spread, it would not, of course, be peculiar to England. The records of the French theatre demonstrate this
fact; in the "Mystery of Saint Barbara," we find this stage direction:—Pausa. Vadunt, et stultus
loquitur. (A pause. They quit the stage, and the fool speaks). And in this way he is frequently brought on
between the scenes.
It is quite obvious that the terms Clown and fool were used, though improperly, perhaps, as synonymous by
our old dramatists. Their confused introduction might render this doubtful to one who had not well considered
the matter. The fool of our early plays denoted a mere idiot or natural, or else a witty hireling retained to make
sport for his masters. The Clown was a character of more variety; sometimes he was a mere rustic; and, often,
no more than a shrewd domestic. There are instances in which any low character in a play served to amuse
with his coarse sallies, and thus became the Clown of the piece. In fact, the fool of the drama was a kind of
heterogeneous being, copied in part from real life, but highly coloured in order to produce effect. This opinion
derives force from what is put into the mouth of Hamlet, when he admonishes those who perform the Clowns,
to speak no more than is set down for them. Indeed, Shakespeare himself cannot be absolved from the
imputation of making mere caricatures of his merry Andrews, unless we suppose, what is very probable, that
his compositions have been much interpolated with the extemporaneous jokes of the players. To this folly,
allusions are made in a clever satire, entitled, "Pasquils Mad-cappe, throwne at the Corruptions of these
Times," 1626, quarto.
"Tell country players, that old paltry jests

Pronounced in a painted motley coate,
Filles all the world so full of cuckoo nests,
That nightingales can scarcely sing a note.
Oh! bid them turn their minds to better meanings;
Fields are ill sowne that give no better gleanings."
Sir Philip Sidney reprobates the custom of introducing fools on the stage; and declares that the plays of his
time were neither right tragedies nor right comedies, for the authors mingled kings and Clowns, "not," says
he, "because the matter so carrieth it, but thrust in the Clowne by head and shoulders to play a part in
majestical matters, with neither decencie nor discretion; so as neither the admiration and commisseration, nor
the right sportfulnesse, is by their mongrell tragie-comedie obtained." Rankin, a puritan, contemporary with
Shakespeare, wrote a most bitter attack on plays and players, whom he calls monsters; "And whie monsters?"
says he, "because under colour of humanitie they present nothing but prodigious vanitie; these are wels
without water, dead branches fit for fuell, cockle amongst corne, unwholesome weedes amongst sweete
hearbes; and, finallie, feends that are crept into the worlde by stealth, and hold possession by subtill invasion."
The Clown or Fool of the early EnglishDrama—Moralities—The Interlude—The rise ofEnglish

36 Tr
In another place, he says, "some transformed themselves to rogues, others to ruffians, some others to Clownes,
a fourth to fools; the rogues were ready, the ruffians were rude, theyr Clownes cladde as well with country
condition, as in ruffe russet; theyr fooles as fond as might be."
To give a clear view of our subject, something of the different sorts of fools may be thus classed:
1.—The general domestic fool, termed often, but improperly, a Clown; described by Puttenham as "a
buffoune, or counterfett foole."
2.—The Clown, who was a mere country booby, or a witty rustic.
3.—The female fool, who was generally an idiot.
4.—The city or corporation fool, an assistant in public entertainments.
5.—The tavern fool, retained to amuse the customers.
6.—The fool of the ancient Mysteries and Moralities, otherwise the Vice.
7.—The fool in the old dumb shows, often alluded to by Shakespeare.
8.—The fool in the Whitsun ales and morris dance.
9.—The mountebank's fool, or merry Andrew.
There may be others in our ancient dramas, of an irregular kind, not reducible to any of these classes; but to
exemplify them is not within the scope of this essay: what has been stated may assist the readers of old plays
to judge for themselves when they meet with such characters.
The practice of retaining fools can be distinctly traced from the remotest times. They were to be found alike in
the palace and the brothel; the Pope had his fool, and the bawd hers; they excited the mirth of kings and
beggars; the hovel of the villain and the castle of the baron were alike exhilarated by their jokes. With respect
to the antiquity of this custom in England, it appears to have existed even during the period of our Saxon
history, but we are certain of the fact in the reign of William the Conqueror. Maitre Wace, an historian of that
time, has an account of the preservation of William's life, when Duke of Normandy, by his fool, Goles; and, in
Domesday book, mention is made of Berdin joculator regis; and though this term sometimes denoted a
minstrel, evidence might be adduced to prove, that in this instance it signified a buffoon.
The entertainment, fools were expected to afford, may be collected in great variety from our old plays,
especially from those of Shakespeare; but, perhaps, a good idea may be formed of their general conduct from
a passage in a curious tract by Lodge, entitled, "Wit's Miserie," 1599, quarto: "Immoderate and disordinate joy
became incorporate in the bodie of a jeaster; this fellow in person is comely, in apparell courtly, but in
behaviour a very ape, and no man; his studie is to coin bitter jeasts, or to shew antique motions, or to sing
baudie sonnets and ballads; give him a little wine in his head, he is continually flearing and making of
mouthes; he laughs intemperately at every little occasion, and dances about the house, leaps over tables,
outskips men's heads, trips up his companions' heeles, burns sack with a candle, and hath all the feats of a lord
of misrule in the countrie: feed him in his humour, you shall have his heart; in mere kindness he will hug you
in his armes, kisse you on the cheeke, and rapping out an horrible oath, crie 'God's soule, Tum, I love you, you
knowe my poore heart, come to my chamber for a pipe of tobacco, there lives not a man in this world that I
more honor.' In these ceremonies you shall know his courting, and it is a speciall mark of him at table, he sits
and makes faces: keep not this fellow company, for in jingling with him, your wardropes shall be wasted, your

37 Tr
credits crackt, your crownes consumed, and time (the most precious riches of the world) utterly lost."
With regard to the fool's business on the stage, it was nearly the same as in reality, with this difference, that
the wit was more highly seasoned. In Middleton's "Mayor of Quinborough," a company of actors, with a
Clown, make their appearance, and the following dialogue ensues:—
1st Cheater. This is our Clown, sir.
Simon. Fye, fye, your company

Must fall upon him and beat him; he's too fair i'faith,
To make the people laugh.
1st Cheater. Not as he may be dress'd, sir.
Simon. Faith, dress him how you will. I'll give him
That gift, he will never look half scurvily enough.
Oh! the Clowns that I have seen in my time,
The very peeping out of one of them would have
Made a young heir laugh, though his father lay a-dying;
A man undone in law the day before,
(The saddest case that can be) might for his second
Have burst himself with laughing, and ended all
His miseries. Here was a merry world, my masters!
Some talk of things of state, of puling stuff;
There's nothing in a play like to a Clown,
If he have the grace to hit on it, that's the thing indeed.
Away then, shift; Clown, to thy motley crupper.
In the praeludium to Goffe's "Careless Shepherdess," 1656, quarto, there is a panegyric on them, and some
concern is shown for the fool's absence in the play itself, while it is stated that "The motley coat was banished
with trunk-hose." Yet in Charles II.'s reign, some efforts were made to restore the character. In the tragedy of
"Thorney Abbey, or the London Maid," 1662, 12mo., the prologue is delivered by a fool, who uses these
words:—"The poet's a fool who made the tragedy, to tell a story of a king and a court, and leave a fool
out on't, when in Pacey's, and Sommer's, and Patche's, and Archer's times, my venerable predecessours, a fool
was alwaies the principal verb." Shadwell's play of "The Woman Captain," 1680, is perhaps the last in which
a regular fool is introduced; and even there, his master is made to say that the character was exploded on the
stage. In real life, as was formerly stated, the professed fool was to be met with at a much later period, but the
custom has long been obsolete.
What I have said of the Mysteries of Religion plays will, I hope, be sufficient to show the reader how they
were associated with Pantomime. The Moralities, founded on the Mysteries, were the means used to inculcate,
by the aid of a slight plot, religious truths without directly using scriptural or legendary subjects. Malone says
of them:—"I am unable to ascertain when the first Morality appeared, but incline to think not sooner
than the reign of Edward IV. (about 1460). The public pageants of the reign of his predecessor were
uncommonly splendid, and being then first enlivened by the introduction of speaking allegorical personages,
properly and characteristically habited, naturally led the way to these personifications, by which Moralities
were distinguished from the simple religious dramas called Mysteries."
The Interlude, that was the progenitor of English Comedy, next arrived. The origin of the Interlude is credited
to John Heywood.

38 Tr
It is interesting to note that a play, entitled, "Gammer Gurton's Needle," is credited with being our first
English Comedy, though its humour and wit, it is stated, is of a low and sordid kind. Others make claim for
the comedy, "Ralph Roister Doister."
Tragedy and Comedy now began to raise their heads, yet they could not, for some time, do more than bluster
and quibble. There is an excellent criticism on them by that distinguished statesman, poet, scholar, and brave
soldier, Sir Philip Sydney. "Some of their pieces were only 'dumb shews,' some with choruses, and some they
explained by an Interlocutor," says an old writer on the subject. The mention of Pantomime in connection with
tragedy, and as an example how Pantomime was requisitioned in Shakespeare's time, is shown in the Second
Scene of Act III. of "Hamlet," wherein the "dumb shew" is given by the players.
The true drama, however, received birth and perfection from the creative geniuses of Shakespeare, Beaumont
and Fletcher, Jonson, and others. Though the stage no sooner began to talk than it grew scurrilous, and plays
were thought "Dangerous to Religion, the State, Honesty, and Manners, and also for Infection, in Time of
Sickness." Wherefore they were afterwards for some time suppressed. But upon application to the Queen and
Council they were again tolerated under the following restrictions: "That no Plays be acted on Sundays at all,
nor on any other Holidays till after Evening Prayer. That no playing be in the Dark, nor continue and such
Time, but the Auditors may return to their Dwellings in London before Sunset, or at least before it be Dark."
The foregoing is from Stow, and this Act was made in the reign of Elizabeth. The Virgin Queen does not seem
to have cared much about this enactment, as we find that on Sunday, the 24th September, 1592, she and her
Court attended a play at Oxford.
As Tragedy and Comedy progressed on the English stage, Pantomime, as far as it was associated with the
dumb shows in the early English drama, became, little by little, a thing of the past.
We have seen, and traced, from the Creation of this planet, and through succeeding ages, how Pantomime has
always flourished; we have seen also how the Interlude gave way to the Comedy; we will now see how this
love of light entertainment formulated in this country by the Interlude, and, about the same time, by the Italian
Masque Comedy, the progenitor of Pantomime (referring to the whole as a spectacle), and the forerunner in
France, also of that other form of light entertainment known as the French Vaudeville, cultivated by Le Sage
and other French writers of note.
To go to the bed-rock for our facts, and for the innovation of all this, it is necessary in thought, and perhaps as
well in spirit, to journey to Italy.
CHAPTER X.
The Italian Masque—The Masque in England—First

appearance in this country of Harlequin—Joe Haines as
Harlequin—Marlowe's "Faustus"—A Curious
Play—The Italian Harlequin—Colley Cibber,
Penkethman—Shakespeare's Burlesques of the
CHAPTER X. 39
Masque—Decline of the Masque.

In Italy the Masque entertainment long held sway, and was a light form of amusement, consisting of
Pantomime, music, singing, and dancing, and an adaptation of the Fabulae Atellanae of ancient Italy. The
performers wore masks, also high-heeled shoes, fitted with brass or iron heels, which jingled as they danced.
This ancient custom to present-day stage dancers will doubtless be of interest. Masks, like on the stages of the
Greeks and the Romans, were used, hence the title Mask, or Masque, as it is sometimes written both ways. In
the days of Elizabeth the custom was also practised in the Elizabethean Masque. The Masquerade and the
Masked ball, or Bal-Masque, are survivals of this ancient custom.
Crossing the Alps, if the reader will accompany me, the Italian Masque Comedy we find was already known
in France in the fifteenth century. In the days of Mary de Medici ballets were introduced, and by the time of
Louis XIV. "Opera" (i.e., the Masque) was in full swing in the early part of this reign. On the Spanish stage
ballets, with allegorical characters, were known in the sixteenth century; and, in fact, throughout Europe about
this age, and some time previously this improvised form of Italian Comedy, and the several characters in it,
belonging to the family of Harlequin, had long been familiar subjects.
Returning to England after our little holiday, the Masque in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries had become
very popular. The architect, Inigo Jones, being frequently employed to furnish the decorations with all the
magnificence of his invention. At the Courts of Elizabeth, James I., Charles I., and up to the time when all
plays were totally suppressed, was it the rage. At the Restoration the Masque was revived again, and here,
borrowing the name from the continent, it is called "Opera." In proof of this, in Dryden's work, "Albion and
Albanius," 1685, "Opera" is defined as a "poetical tale or picture represented by vocal and instrumental music,
and endowed with machines and dances."
The dramatic poet and author, Ben Jonson, collaborated with Inigo Jones, the architect, in devising these
Masque plays, Jonson supplying the words, and Jones the scenic effects, the latter being very gorgeous,
consisting of "landscapes, mountains, and clouds, which opened to display heathen deities illuminated by
variegated coloured lights." Over these Masques or "Operatic" entertainments Jonson and Jones quarrelled, as
the former's grievance was that he received no more for his librettos than Jones did for his scenic devices. Ben
Jonson thereupon wrote satires upon Inigo Jones, and in one of his squibs appears the satirical line, "Painting
and Carpentry are the Soul of Masque." Is not this applicable to many of our present-day Pantomimes, which,
as I have just stated in the previous chapter, the Masque was one of the original progenitors?
Inigo Jones and Jonson first collaborated in the "Masque of Blackness," performed at Whitehall on Twelfth
Night, 1603. In our money this Masque cost some £10,000. Jones and Jonson's quarrel originated because the
poet had, in the "Masque of Chloridia," performed in 1630, prefixed his own name before that of Jones. In
consequence of this "rare old Ben" was deprived—through Jones' influence—of employment at
Court.
Gifford, in his "Memoirs of Ben Jonson," says that "In poetry, painting, architecture, they (the Masques) have
not since been equalled."
"The Masque," continues Gifford, "as it attained its highest degree of excellence, admitted of dialogue,
singing and dancing; these were not independent of one another, but combined by the introduction of some
ingenious fable into an harmonious whole. When the plan was formed, the aid of the sister-arts was called in;
for the essence of the Masque was pomp and glory. Movable scenery of the most costly and splendid kind was
lavished on the Masque; the most celebrated masters were employed on the songs and dances; and all that the
kingdom afforded of vocal and instrumental excellence was employed to embellish the exhibition. Thus,
magnificently constructed, was composed, as Lord Bacon says, for princes, and by princes it was played. Of
The Italian Masque—The Masque in England—Firstappearance in this country of Harlequin—Joe

40
these Masques, the skill with which their ornaments were designed, and the inexpressible grace with which
they were executed appear to have left a vivid impression on the mind of Jonson. His genius awakens at once,
and all his faculties attune to sprightliness and pleasure. He makes his appearance like his own Delight,
accompanied with Grace, Love, Harmony, Revel, Sport, and Laughter."
In the Masques the Pantomimic dances of the Masquers were known as motions:—
"In curious knot and mazes so

The Spring at first was taught to go;
And Zephyr, when he came to woo
His Flora had his motions too;
And thus did Venus learn to lead
The Idalian brawls, and so to tread,
As if the wind, not she did walk,
Nor press'd a flower, nor bow'd a stalk."
Before the arrival of the Italian Masque in England, the Harlequin family were unknown, and, doubtless,
Harlequin's first appearance in this country was in consonance with the Masque itself.
Heywood, in a tract, published in 1609, entitled, "Troia Britannica," mentions "Zanyes, Pantaloons,
Harlakeans, in which the French, but especially the Italians, have been excellent as known in this country."
The earliest record I can find of a Harlequin performing in this country is in the Masque given before Charles
I. and his Court on the Sunday evening following Twelfth Night, 1637. An account of this Masque, as well as
other information dealing with the Masque entertainments, will be found in my volume, "Stage Whispers,"
and in the article on theatrical scenery.
In a comedy, written by Ravenscroft, after the Italian manner, Joe Haines, in 1667, donned the motley jacket
of Harlequin, and which, in all probability, was the first appearance of Harlequin on the English boards,
though not in England, as stated above. In a farce of the audacious Mrs. Aphra Behn's, produced twenty years
afterwards, Harlequin and Scaramouch were two of the characters. Mrs. Behn died April 16, 1689, and was
buried in the cloisters of Westminster Abbey. To Marlowe's "Faustus," Mountfort added comic scenes to the
tragedy, introducing Harlequin and Scaramouch. A Harlequin, Pantaloon, Columbine, and Clown appeared in
a curious piece in 1697, entitled, "Novelty; or Every Act a Play." The first act consisted of a pastoral Drama,
the second of a Comedy, the third a Masque, the fourth a Tragedy, and the fifth act a Farce.
In Italy the fame of Harlequin was at its zenith at the close of the seventeenth century. In this country in 1687
a Harlequin (Penkethman) appeared in a farce called "The Emperor of the Moon" without a mask. Colley
Cibber says of this performance "That when he (Penkethman) first played Harlequin in 'The Emperor of the
Moon' several gentlemen (who inadvertently judged by the rules of nature) fancied that a great deal of the
drollery, and spirit of his grimace was lost by his wearing that useless, unmeaning mask, therefore insisted
that the next time of his acting that part he should play without it. Their desire was accordingly complied with,
but alas! in vain—Penkethman was no more Harlequin. His humour was quite disconcerted."
In "The Tempest," Shakespeare introduces a Masque, and also in his "Midsummer Nights' Dream," the play of
"Pyramus and Thisbe," performed by the Clowns, is in burlesque of the Masque plays.
In both these two plays of the bard's, and in connection with the Masque plays, we see, from the stage
directions in them, how Pantomime formed part of their effective representation.
The Italian Masque—The Masque in England—Firstappearance in this country of Harlequin—Joe

41
In out heroding-herod in the way of splendour, showy dresses and expensive machinery, the Masque soon fell
into decay; and, as Ben Jonson states, "The glory of all these solemnities had perished like a blaze, and gone
out in the beholder's eyes; so short-lived are the bodies of all things in comparison with their souls."
CHAPTER XI.
Italian Pantomime—Riccoboni—Broom's
"Antipodes"—Gherardi—Extemporal
Comedies—Salvator Rosa—Impromptu Acting.
Pantomime in Italy had two distinct features, one a species of buffoonery, termed Lazzi, and the other
Extemporal or Improvised Comedies.
"Lazzi," mentions Riccoboni, in his "Histoire du Theâtre Italien," is a term corrupted from the old Tuscan
Lacci, which signifies a knot, or something that connects. (Both the Lazzi and the Extemporal Comedies were
all derived from the one original source, that of the Satirical drama of the Greeks, and perpetuated in the
Fabulae Atellanae or Laudi Osci of Italy.)
Riccoboni continues: "These pleasantries, called Lazzi, are certain actions by which the performer breaks into
the scene, to paint to the eye his emotions of panic or jocularity; but as such gestures are foreign to the
business going on, the nicety of the art consists in not interrupting the scene, and connecting the Lazzi with it;
thus to tie the whole together."
Lazzi is what we might term "bye play," which, by gesture and action, could not detract, but rather added to
the effectiveness of the scene in progress.
In Broom's "Antipodes," which was performed at the Salisbury Court Theatre, London, in 1638, a by-play, as
he calls it, is represented in this comedy—"A word (explains Malone) for the application of which we
are indebted to this writer, there being no other term in our language that I know of, which so properly
expresses that species of Interlude which we find in our poet's 'Hamlet,' and other pieces."
Riccoboni, in describing some Lazzi, says that Harlequin and Scapin being in a famished condition, Scapin, in
order to bring their young mistress out, asks Harlequin to groan. Scapin explains to her the reason, and while
they are talking, Harlequin is performing his Lazzi. This consists of eating an imaginary hatful of cherries, and
throwing the stones at Scapin; or catching imaginary flies, and chopping off their wings.
"Lazzi," we are told, "although they seem to interrupt the progress of the action, yet in cutting it they slide
back into it, and connect or tie the whole."
When Riccoboni and his company first appeared in France, though being unable to speak nothing but Italian,
their audiences, though not being able to understand the words, yet the performers were such past-masters in
the Mimetic Art that their representations were just as intelligible and as expressive as if they had been with
words.
CHAPTER XI. 42
Gherardi, in his treatise, "Theâtre Italien," speaks of a Scaramouch, who, waiting for his master, Harlequin,
seats and plays on the guitar. Suddenly, by Pasquariel, he is thrown into a fright. "It was then," says Gherardi,
"that incomparable model of our most eminent actors displayed the miracles of his art; that art which paints
the passions in the face, throws them into every gesture, and through a whole scene of frights upon frights,
conveys the most powerful expression of ludicrous terror. This man moved all hearts by the simplicity of
nature, more than skilful orators can with all the charms of persuasive rhetoric."
The Extemporal Comedies were all improvised, the actors underwent no rehearsal, and, as the name denotes,
everything was impromptu. The Scenario, or plot, had just simply the scenes and the characters set forth, and
it was then hung in a conspicuous place on the stage; and just in a similar way as the gas or lime light "plots"
are affixed in present day theatres, though the Scenarios were not as elaborate as what some of our gas or
limelight "plots" are.
Before going on the stage, the Mimes just inspected the Scenario of the Comedia Del' Arte, and for the
dialogue and action everything depended solely upon their Pantomimic genius.
Disraeli mentions that men of great genius had a passion for performing in these Extemporal Comedies, and,
amongst others, the great painter, Salvator Rosa. A favourite character of Rosa's was that of Formica, a Clown
of Calabria. Passeri, in his life of Rosa, tells the following anecdote:—
One summer, Salvator Rosa joined a company of young persons, who were curiously addicted to the making
of Comedie all' Improviso. In the midst of a vineyard they raised a rustic stage, under the direction of one
Mussi, who enjoyed some literary reputation, particularly for his sermons preached in Lent.
Their second Comedy was numerously attended, and I went among the rest. I sat on the same bench by good
fortune with Cavalier Bernini, Romanelli, and Guido, all well-known persons. Salvator Rosa, who had already
made himself a favourite with the Roman people, under the character of Formica, opened with a prologue in
company with other actors. He proposed for relieving themselves of the extreme heats and ennui that they
should make a Comedy, and all agreed. Formica (Rosa) then spoke (in the satirical Venetian dialect) these
exact words, which Mr. Disraeli translates as follows:—"I will not, however, that we should make a
Comedy like certain persons who cut clothes, and put them on this man's back, and on that man's back; for at
last the time comes which shows how much faster went the cut of the shears than the pen of the poet; nor will
we have entering on the scene, couriers, brandy sellers, and goatherds, and there stare shy and blockish, which
I think worthy the senseless invention of an ass."
Passeri continues: "At this time Bernini had made a Comedy in the Carnival very pungent and biting; and that
summer he had one of Castelli's performed in the suburbs, where, to represent the dawn of day, appeared on
the stage water-carriers, couriers, and goat-herds, going about—all which is contrary to rule, which
allows of no character who is not concerned in the dialogue to mix with the groups. At these words of the
Formica, I, who well knew his meaning, instantly glanced my eye at Bernini, to observe his movements; but
he, with an artificial carelessness, showed that this 'cut of the shears' did not touch him; and he made no
apparent show of being hurt. But Castelli, who was also near, tossing his head and smiling in bitterness,
showed clearly that he was hit."
In concluding, Mr. Disraeli observes that: "This Italian story, told with all the poignant relish of these
vivacious natives, to whom such a stinging incident was an important event, also shows the personal freedoms
taken on these occasions by a man of genius, entirely in the spirit of the ancient Roman Atellanae or the
Grecian Satyra."
Of Extemporal Comedies, Riccoboni mentions that: "This kind of spectacle is peculiar to Italy; one cannot
deny that it has graces perfectly its own, and which written Comedy can never exhibit. This impromptu mode
Italian Pantomime—Riccoboni—Broom's"Antipodes"—Gherardi—ExtemporalComedies&m
43
of acting furnishes opportunities for a perpetual change in the performance, so that the same Scenario repeated
still appears a new one: thus one Comedy may become twenty Comedies. An actor of this description, always
supposing an actor of genius, is more vividly affected than one who has coldly got his part by rote. But figure,
memory, voice, and even sensibility, are not sufficient for the actor all' improvista; he must be in the habit of
cultivating the imagination, pouring forth the flow of expression, and prompt in those flashes which instantly
vibrate in the plaudits of an audience."
Again, Gherardi: "Anyone may learn a part by rote, and do something bad, or indifferent, on another theatre.
With us the affair is quite otherwise; and when an Italian actor dies, it is with infinite difficulty that we can
supply his place. An Italian actor learns nothing by head; he looks on the subject for a moment before he
comes forward on the stage, and entirely depends upon his imagination for the rest. The actor who is
accustomed merely to recite what he has been taught is so completely occupied by his memory, that he
appears to stand, as it were, unconnected either with the audience or his companions; he is so impatient to
deliver himself of the burthen he is carrying that he trembles like a schoolboy, or is as senseless as an echo,
and could never speak if others had not spoken before. Such a tutored actor among us would be like a
paralytic arm to a body: an unserviceable member, only fatiguing the healthy action of the sound parts."
CHAPTER XII.
Pantomimical Characters—Neapolitan Pantomime—The

Harlequin Family—The Original Characters in the Italian
Pantomimes—Celebrated Harlequins—Italian and French
Harlequins—A French view of the English
Clown—Pierrots' origin—Pantaloon, how the name has
been derived—Columbine—Marionette and Puppet
Shows.
After having shown what the Lazzi and Extemporal Comedies were like, let us now turn to the Pantomimical
characters associated with their representations.
Every one, observes Mr. Isaac Disraeli, of this grotesque family were the creatures of national genius, chosen
by the people for themselves. Italy, both ancient and modern, exhibits a gesticulating people of comedians,
and the same comic genius characterised the nation through all its revolutions, as well as the individual
through all his fortunes. The lower classes still betray their aptitude in that vivid humour, where the action is
suited to the word—silent gestures sometimes expressing whole sentences. They can tell a story, and
even raise the passions, without opening their lips. No nation in modern Europe possesses so keen a relish for
the burlesque, insomuch as to show a class of unrivalled poems, which are distinguished by the very title; and
perhaps there never was an Italian in a foreign country, however deep in trouble, but would drop all
remembrance of his sorrows, should one of his countrymen present himself with the paraphernalia of Punch at
the corner of a street. I was acquainted with an Italian, a philosopher and a man of fortune, residing in this
country, who found so lively a pleasure in performing Punchinello's little comedy, that, for this purpose, with
considerable expense and curiosity, he had his wooden company, in all their costume, sent over from his
CHAPTER XII. 44
native place. The shrill squeak of the tin whistle had the same comic effect on him as the notes of the Ranz des
Vaches have in awakening the tenderness of domestic emotions in the wandering Swiss—the national
genius is dramatic. Lady Wortley Montagu when she resided at a villa near Brescia, was applied to by the
villagers for leave to erect a theatre in her saloon: they had been accustomed to turn the stables into a
playhouse every Carnival. She complied, and, as she tells us, was "Surprised at the beauty of their scenes,
though painted by a country painter. The performance was yet more surprising, the actors being all peasants;
but the Italians have so natural a genius for comedy, they acted as well as if they had been brought up to
nothing else, particularly the Arlechino, who far surpassed any of our English, though only the tailor of our
village, and I am assured never saw a play in any other place." Italy is the mother, and the nurse, of the whole
Harlequin race.
Hence it is that no scholars in Europe but the most learned Italians, smit by the national genius, could have
devoted their vigils to narrate the evolutions of Pantomime, to compile the annals of Harlequin, to unroll the
genealogy of Punch, and to discover even the most secret anecdotes of the obscurer branches of that grotesque
family, amidst their changeful fortunes, during a period of two thousand years. Nor is this all; princes have
ranked them among the Rosciuses; and Harlequins and Scaramouches have been ennobled. Even Harlequins
themselves have written elaborate treatises on the almost insurmountable difficulties of their art. I despair to
convey the sympathy they have inspired me with to my reader; but every Tramontane genius must be
informed, that of what he has never seen, he must rest content to be told.
Of the ancient Italian troop we have retained three or four of the characters, while their origin has nearly
escaped our recollection; but of the burlesque comedy, the extempore dialogue, the humorous fable, and its
peculiar species of comic acting, all has vanished.
Many of the popular pastimes of the Romans unquestionably survived their dominion, for the people will
amuse themselves, though their masters may be conquered; and tradition has never proved more faithful than
in preserving popular sports. Many of the games of our children were played by Roman boys; the
mountebanks, with the dancers and tumblers on their moveable stages, still in our fairs, are Roman; the
disorders of the Bacchanalia, Italy appears to imitate in her Carnivals. Among these Roman diversions certain
comic characters have been transmitted to us, along with some of their characteristics, and their dresses. The
speaking Pantomimes and Extemporal Comedies which have delighted the Italians for many centuries, are
from this ancient source.
Rich, in his "Companion to the Latin Dictionary," has an excellent illustration of this passage:—"This
Art was of very great antiquity, and much practiced by the Greeks and Romans, both on the stage and in the
tribune, induced by their habit of addressing large assemblies in the open air, where it would have been
impossible for the majority to comprehend what was said without the assistance of some conventional signs,
which enabled the speaker to address himself to the eye, as well as the ear of the audience. These were chiefly
made by certain positions of the hands and fingers, the meaning of which was universally recognised and
familiar to all classes, and the practice itself reduced to a regular system, as it remains at the present time
amongst the populace of Naples, who will carry on a long conversation between themselves by mere
gesticulation, and without pronouncing a word." That many of these signs are similar to those used by the
Ancients, is proved by the same author, who copies from an antique vase a scene which he explains by the
action of the hands of the figures, adding, "A common lazzaroni, when shown one of these compositions, will
at once explain the purport of the action, which a scholar with all his learning cannot divine." The gesture to
signify love, employed by the Ancients and modern Neapolitans, was joining the tips of the thumb and
forefinger of the left hand; an imputation or asseveration by holding forth the right hand; a denial by raising
the same hand, extending the fingers. In mediaeval works of art, a particular attitude of the fingers is adopted
to exhibit malicious hate: it is done by crossing the forefinger of each hand, and is generally seen in figures of
Herod or Judas Iscariot.
Pantomimical Characters—Neapolitan Pantomime—TheHarlequin Family—The Original

45 Characte
Down to the fifteenth century there is not much known of the family of Harlequin, with the exception,
perhaps, that the name Zany became more widely distributed into such as Drolls, Clowns, Pantaloons,
Punches, Scaramouches, and the like. In the Italian Comedy, of purely native growth, the original characters
were Pantaloon, a Venetian Merchant; Dottore, a Bolognese physician; Spavento, a Neapolitan braggart;
Pulcinello, a wag of Apalia; Giangurgoto and Corviello, two Clowns of Cala-simpleton; and Arlechino, a
blundering servant of Bergamo.
The latter The Harlequin of the Italian theatre, has passed through, mentions Mr. Disraeli, all the vicissitudes
of fortune. At first (as we have seen) he was a true representative of the ancient Mime; but, during the
fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, he degenerated into a booby and a gourmand, the perpetual butt for a
sharp-witted fellow, his companion, Brighella, the knife and the whetstone. Harlequin, however, under the
reforming hand of Goldoni, became, in after years, a child of nature, and the delight of his country; and he has
commemorated the historical character of the great Harlequin Sacchi. It may serve the reader to correct his
notions of one, from the absurd pretender with us who has usurped the title. "Sacchi possessed a lively and
brilliant imagination. While other Harlequins merely repeated themselves, Sacchi, who always adhered to the
essence of the play, contrived to give an air of freshness to the piece by his new sallies and unexpected
repartees. His comic traits and his jests were neither taken from the language of the lower orders, nor that of
the comedians. He levied contributions on comic authors, on poets, orators, and philosophers; and in his
impromptus they often discovered the thoughts of Seneca, Cicero, or Montaigne. He possessed the art of
appropriating the remains of these great men to himself, and allying them to the simplicity of the blockhead;
so that the same proposition which was admired in a serious author, became highly ridiculous in the mouth of
this excellent actor." In France Harlequin was improved into a wit, and even converted into a moralist; he is
the graceful hero of Florian's charming compositions, which please even in the closet. "This imaginary being,
invented by the Italians, and adopted by the French," says the ingenious Goldoni, "has the exclusive right of
uniting naiveté with finesse, and no one ever surpassed Florian in the delineation of this amphibious character.
He has even contrived to impart sentiment, passion, and morality to his pieces." Harlequin must be modelled
as a national character, the creature of manners; and thus the history of such a Harlequin might be that of the
age and of the people, whose genius he ought to represent.
The history of a people is often detected in their popular amusements; one of these Italian Pantomimic
characters shows this. They had a Capitan, who probably originated in the Miles gloriosus of Plautus; a
brother, at least, of our Ancient Pistol and Bobadil. The ludicrous names of this military poltroon were
Spavento (Horrid fright), Spezza-fer (Shiver-spear), and a tremendous recreant was Captain Spavento de Val
inferno. When Charles V. entered Italy, a Spanish Captain was introduced; a dreadful man he was too, if we
are to be frightened by names: Sangre e Fuego! and Matamoro! His business was to deal in Spanish
rhodomontades, to kick out the native Italian Capitan, in compliment to the Spaniards, and then to take a quiet
caning from Harlequin, in compliment to themselves. When the Spaniards lost their influence in Italy, the
Spanish Captain was turned into Scaramouch, who still wore the Spanish dress, and was perpetually in a
panic. The Italians could only avenge themselves on the Spaniards in Pantomime! On the same principle the
gown of Pantaloon over his red waistcoat and breeches, commemorates a circumstance in Venetian history
expressive of the popular feeling.
The characters of the Italian Pantomime became so numerous, that every dramatic subject was easily
furnished with the necessary personages of comedy. That loquacious pedant, the Dottore, was taken from the
lawyers and the physicians, babbling false Latin in the dialect of learned Bologna. Scapin was a livery servant,
who spoke the dialect of Bergamo, a province proverbially abounding with rank intriguing knaves, who, like
the slaves in Plautus and Terence, were always on the watch to further any wickedness; while Calabria
furnished the booby Giangurgello with his grotesque nose. Molière, it has been ascertained, discovered in the
Italian theatre at Paris his "Medecin malgre Lui," his "Etourdi," his "L'Avare," and his "Scapin." Milan offered
a pimp in Brighella; Florence, an ape of fashion in Gelsomino. These and other Pantomimic characters, and
some ludicrous ones, as the Tartaglia, a spectacled dotard, a stammerer, and usually in a passion, had been

46 Characte
gradually introduced by the inventive powers of an actor of genius, to call forth his own peculiar talents.
The Pantomimes, or, as they have been described, the continual Masquerades, of Ruzzante, with all these
diversified personages, talking and acting, formed, in truth, a burlesque comedy. Some of the finest geniuses
of Italy became the votaries of Harlequin; and the Italian Pantomime may be said to form a school of its own.
The invention of Ruzzante was one capable of perpetual novelty. Many of these actors have been chronicled
either for the invention of some comic character, or for their true imitation of nature in performing some
favourite one. One, already immortalised by having lost his real name in that of Captain Matamoros, by whose
inimitable humours he became the most popular man in Italy, invented the Neapolitan Pullicinello; while
another, by deeper study, added new graces to another burlesque rival. One Constantini invented the character
of Mezetin, as the Narcissus of Pantomime. He acted without a mask, to charm by the beautiful play of his
countenance, and display the graces of his figure; the floating drapery of his fanciful dress could be arranged
by the changeable humour of the wearer. Crowds followed him in the streets, and a King of Poland ennobled
him. The Wit and Harlequin Dominic sometimes dined at the table of Louis XIV.—Tiberio Florillo,
who invented the character of Scaramouch, had been the amusing companion of the boyhood of Louis XIV.;
and from him Molière learnt much, as appears by the verses under his portrait:—
Cet illustre comédien

De son art traça la carrière:
II fut le maître de Molière,
Et la Nature fut le sien.
The last lines of an epitaph on one of these Pantomimic actors may be applied to many of them during their
flourishing period:—
Toute sa vie il a fait rire;

Il a fait pleurer a sa mort.
Several of these admirable actors were literary men, who have written on their art, and shown that it was one.
The Harlequin Cecchini composed the most ancient treatise on this subject, and was ennobled by the Emperor
Matthias; and Nicholas Barbieri, for his excellent acting called the Beltrame, a Milanese simpleton, in his
treatise on comedy, tells us that he was honoured by the conversation of Louis XIII., and rewarded with
fortune.
A sketch of Harlequin's original part is worth recording. "He is a mixture of wit, simplicity, ignorance, and
grace, he is a half made up man, a great child with gleams of reason and intelligence, and all his mistakes and
blunders have something arch about them. The true mode of representing him is to give him suppleness,
agility, the playfulness of a kitten with a certain coarseness of exterior, which renders his actions more absurd.
His part is that of a faithful valet; greedy; always in love; always in trouble, either on his own or his master's
account; afflicted and consoled as easily as a child, and whose grief is as amusing as his joy."
His costume consisted of a jacket fastened in front with loose ribbons, and pantaloons of wide dimensions,
patched with various coloured pieces of cloth sewn on in any fashion. His beard was worn straight, and of a
black colour; on his face he had a half black mask and in his belt of untanned leather he carried a wooden
sword.
In Italy there were many varieties of Harlequin, the most notable being Trivelin, and Truffaldin. The dress of
the former, instead of the patches symmetrically arranged, had triangular patches along the seams, and suns
and moons only for patches. He wore the soft hat and hare's foot, but did not carry the wooden sword. The
hare's foot denoting speed, has in all probability its origin in the winged cap of the god Mercury.

47 Characte
Truffaldin is a species of Harlequin, who first appeared about 1530. He represented (truffa, the villain) a
sneaking kind of knave, and in the middle of the seventeenth century this character was very popular.
In France, about 1660, Cardinal Mazarin invited one Joseph Dominique Biancolelli, to come to Paris to give
entertainments. Shortly after his arrival Biancolelli gave quite a new reading to the character of Arlechino, as
he made him not only a wit and punster, but also a bit of a philosopher. Biancolelli's improvements did not
end here, as he turned his attention to the dress of Arlechino, which was now made of finer and better quality,
whilst the parti-coloured patches were made more artistic and attractive. On the death of Lolatelli, who, in his
lifetime, had played a kind of Arlechino part, Biancolelli succeeded him, and soon sprang into prominence,
and acquired a great artistic reputation. Whilst dancing before Louis XV. Biancolelli contracted a cold, which
set up inflammation of the lungs, causing his death. His companions, at the theatre in which he performed, to
mark the sense of their great grief, closed the theatre for a month. Biancolelli died in 1688.
As Arlechino, Biancolelli was succeeded by his son, Pierre, who played under the name of Dominique.
A Tuscan, named Gherardi, who had obtained celebrity as a singer, was the next successful French Harlequin.
In consequence of a fall Gherardi met his death, in the year 1700.
Nearly a couple of decades afterwards, in 1716, Thomassin made his appearance as Harlequin, in pieces
written for him by Marivaux, such as "Le Prince Travesti," "La Surprise de l'Amour," and in which he
appeared with great success. So daring were Thomassin's tricks, and in such popularity was he held, that,
fearful of losing their favourite like Gherardi, he was obliged to discontinue them.
Another competitor now arose to take the crown from Thomassin, and in the person of one Carlo Bertinazzi,
commonly called Carlin. Our actor, Garrick, was an admirer of this famous Mime. Of Carlin, M. Sand
speaks:—"Like most clever buffoons, he had a very melancholy disposition, and, as with Dominique,
his gaiety was what the English term humour. It belonged to his mind, and not to his temperament." Carlin
also wrote a book entitled, "Les Metamorphosis d'Arlequin." In 1783 Carlin died, and his place in the favour
of the public was filled by Galinetti.
The French view of the English Clown is interesting: "The English clown (whose nearest representative on the
French stage is Pierrot) is an odd and fantastical being. The Florentine Stentorella alone resembles him in his
jests and tricks. His strange dress seems to have been taken from the American Indians. It consists of a white,
red, yellow, and green net work, ornamented with diamond-shaped pieces of stuff of various colours. His face
is floured, and streaked with paint a deep carmine; the forehead is prolonged to the top of the head, which is
covered with a red wig, from the centre of which a little stiff tail points to the sky. His manners are no less
singular than his costume. He is not dumb, like our Pierrot, but, on the contrary, he sustains an animated and
witty conversation; he is also an acrobat, and very expert in feats of strength."
M. Blandelaire gives a more poetical description: "The English Pierrot is not a person as pale as the moon,
mysterious as silent, straight and long, like the gallows to whom we have been accustomed in Deburean. The
English Pierrot enters like the tempest, and tumbles like a parcel; his laugh resembles joyous thunder. He is
short and fat; his face is floured and streaked with paint; he has a great patch of red on each cheek; his mouth
is enlarged by prolongation of the lips by means of two red bands, so that when he laughs his mouth appears
to open from ear to ear."
The Pierrots—not only in France, but on the Continent generally—took all the characteristics of
the Zanys, Bertoldo, Paggliaccio, Gros, Giullaume, Pedrolino, Gilles, Corviello, and Peppe Nappa, of the
Italian Comedy, and all owing at least their original conception to the theatres of the Greeks, and the Romans.
On the Italian stage there was not a principal Clown like in England, the foremost place being occupied by
Arlechino. The four principal masked characters of the Italian Comedia del' Arte in Venice consisted of

48 Characte
Tartaglia (a stammerer), Truffildino, Brighella (a representative of orators and public personages), and
Pantaloon (a native of Venice). The name of Pantaloon is derived from planta-leone (plante-lion—he
planted the lion). The probable meaning of it in this particular is that the Venetian merchants, it is said, in
boasting of their conquests set up their standard—the Venetian standard being the lion of St.
Mark—on various islands in the Mediterranean, and from which they were nicknamed, it is said, "plant
lion." A more probable derivation of the word is that the ancient patron saint of Venice is San Pantaleone. St.
Pantaleone's day is July 27. He was martyred A.D. 303. In "Childe Harold," Lord Byron, in Canto IV., stanza
14, has that "The Venetian name of Pantaleone is her very by-word."
Pantaloon has been, at various times, husband, father, and widower. Sometimes he is rich, then poor, and
occasionally a spendthrift. The dress that he wore consisted of tight red breeches, rather short, a long black
robe, red stockings and waistcoat, a little woollen skull-cap and slippers.
When the Venetian republic lost Negropont mourning generally was adopted, and Pantaloon adopted it with
the rest, and on the Continent mourning has, I believe, formed a component part of Pantaloon's dress ever
since.
In 1750 Darbes, in Italy, was one of the best Pantaloons. Darbes, on one occasion, ventured to play this
character in one of Goldoni characters, without a mask, and which, we are told, was a failure. A similar
attempt was made on the English stage, which I have previously referred to.
Mention has been previously made of females appearing on the stage during the Grecian and Roman periods.
From this, however, there arose on the Italian stage, in after years, the Servetta or Fantesca, a kind of waiting
maid, or "accomplished companion" part, and called later, in France, Soubrette, and the origin of which, in all
probability, can be traced to the Mimas of Pantomimus.
In the sixteenth century mention is made of a troupe of performers known as Amorosos or Innamortos,
appearing in Italy. Those who only appeared in the female parts were known as Colombina, Oliva, Fianetta,
Pasquella, and Nespella. Columbina's part, the "accomplished companion," like the Vita of the Indian Drama,
was sometimes that of mistress, and sometimes that of maid. Up to 1560 women were unknown on the Italian
stage. In England just one hundred years later.
Three generations of the family of Biancolelli, the Harlequin, grandmother, grand-daughter, and great
grand-daughter appeared as Columbines in France. The most talented was Catherine, the daughter of
Dominique, and she made her debut in 1683, in "Arlequin Protée," with great success.
About 1695, Columbine appeared in a parti-coloured gown like a female Harlequin, and in the piece "Le
Retour de la foie de Besons," acted at the Comedie Italiene. As the innovation was much liked, the part of
Columbine came to be dressed like the Harlequin. The Columbine dressed in short muslin skirts is a creation
of modern times. In the French Comedies Columbine was often Harlequin's wife, but she never had the
powers of a magical wand.
In the old form of Pantomime there were many other personages in these dumb shows which we never had in
the English Pantomimes. To note a few of them:—The Captain, a bragging swash-buckler; the
Apothecary, a half-starved individual with a red nose; and a female soubrette, who acted for her mistress,
Columbine, similar duties as what Clown performed as valet for his master. The Doctor brought at first on the
stage in 1560, was supposed to be a lawyer or a physician. From 1560 his dress was that of a professor's, a
short, black tunic, stockings, and a black mask covering the forehead and nose. Another, Façanappa, had a
long parrot nose, surmounted by a pair of green spectacles, a flat hat, with a broad brim, a waistcoat covered
with tinsel, and a long white coat with large pockets. Like the Clown of our early English plays, and like his
ancestors, the Atellans and Mimes, he had the privilege of making allusions from the stage, in what, I suppose,

49 Characte
were something like the Interludes. Il Barone is another variety. He was a Sicilian lord, deceived by his
daughter, and also duped by his valets. "Il Barone" was a favourite subject for another form of "Miming," that
of the wooden figures called Marionettes.
Marionette entertainments were known both to the Greeks and the Romans. The adventures of "Don Juan"
and "Don Giovanni," of the Italian Opera, in all probability sprang originally from the adventures of Punch in
the puppet shows.
Puppet shows introduced into France (temp. Charles IX.) from Italy, where they were and are still known as
Fantoccini, by Marion—hence their name—and then into this country, are mentioned by
Shakespeare, Pepys, Jonson, Swift, and the Essayists.
Puppet shows, in this country, were formerly known as "Motions." Shakespeare's Antolycus frequented fairs
and the like, and he also composed a "Motion" of "The Prodigal Son." Mystery plays were also represented by
puppets.
In England, especially at Bartholomew Fair, they were always very popular, and the chief survivor of this
form of "dumb show" is "Mr. Punch" of our streets, whose ancient history I have briefly mentioned in another
chapter, but not that of "Mrs. Punch," on whose history I am unable—however so brief—to
throw any light.
Let us now, dear reader, return to England, and trace in this country something more of the History of
Pantomime, and for which we will now open another chapter.
CHAPTER XIII.
Italian Scenarios and English

"Platts"—Pantaloon—Tarleton, the
Clown—Extemporal Comedy—The Poet
Milton—Ben Jonson—The Commonwealth—"A
Reign of Dramatic Terror"—Robert Cox and his "Humours" and
"Drolleries"—The Restoration.
It has been thought that our dramatic poet, Massinger, drew upon the Italian Comedy for the humour of some
of his plays. That there was some form of intercourse between the English and Italian stage is shown by the
discovery of one of the Italian Scenarios, or "Platts," as we know them, at Dulwich College, which discovery
Steevens describes as "a mysterious fragment of ancient stage direction, and of a species of dramatic
entertainment which no memorial is preserved in any annals of the English stage." The "Platt," written in a
large hand, "And containing directions, was thought to have been affixed near the prompter's stand, and it has
even an oblong hole in its centre to admit of being suspended on a wooden peg (Disraeli). On it, and in a
familiar way, appear the names of the players, such as: Pigg, White and Black, Dick and Sam, Little Will
Barne, Jack Gregory, and the Red-faced fellow."
CHAPTER XIII. 50
A "Platt" of the "Seven Deadly Sinnes," supposed to have been written by Dick Tarleton, the famous Clown,
is preserved, I believe, in Dulwich College. It consists of a pasteboard fifteen inches high, and nine in breadth,
and on it is written, in two columns, the following:—
"A tent being placed on the stage for Henry the Sixth; he in it asleep. To him the lieutenant, and a pursuivant
(R. Cowley, Jo. Duke), and one warder (R. Pallant). To them Pride, Gluttony, Wrath, and Covetousness at one
door; at another door Envy, Sloth, and Lechery. The three put back the four, and so exeunt.
"Henry awaking, enter a keeper (J. Sinclair), to him a servant (T. Belt), to him Lidgate and the keeper. Exit,
then enter again—then Envy passeth over the stage. Lidgate speaks."
These "Platts" were, in all probability, one of the first written forms of Pantomimic entertainments known in
England, and borrowed, as mentioned, from the Scenarios of the Italians. That form of home amusement
well-known in family circles, "Acting Charades," may be likened to them.
To get all the information that we can obtain of the "Platts," I am sure I cannot do better than quote the words
of Mr. Isaac Disraeli, well assured that they will be more acceptable than any I can make.
Some of these "Platts" are on solemn subjects, like the tragic Pantomimes; and in some appear "Pantaloon,
and his man Peascod, with spectacles." Steevens observes, that he met with no earlier example of the
appearance of Pantaloon, as a specific character on our stage; and that this direction concerning "the
spectacles" cannot fail to remind the reader of a celebrated passage in "As you like it." (Scene 6, Act II.).
... "The sixth age shifts

Into the lean and slippered pantaloon;
With spectacles on nose, and pouch on side;
His youthful hose well saved, a world too wide
For his shrunk shank; and his big manly voice,
Turning again toward childish treble, pipes
And whistles in his sound."
Perhaps, he adds, Shakespeare alludes to this personage, as habited in his own time. The old age of Pantaloon
is marked by his leanness, and his spectacles and his slippers. He always runs after Harlequin, but cannot
catch him; as he runs in slippers and without spectacles, is liable to pass him by without seeing him. Can we
doubt that this Pantaloon had come from the Italian theatre, after what we have already said? Does not this
confirm the conjecture, that there existed an intercourse between the Italian theatre and our own? Further,
Tarleton, the comedian, celebrated for his "Extemporal wit," was the writer or inventor of one of these
"Platts." Stow records of one of our actors that "he had a quick, delicate, refined Extemporal wit." And
Howes, the continuator of Stow's Chronicles of another, that "he had a wondrous, plentiful, pleasant,
Extemporal wit."
Praiseworthy reference is also made of Tarleton in "Kinde-Hart's Dream," 4to., published in 1592. In 1611 a
book was published entitled "Tarleton's Jeasts." Tarleton was so celebrated in his time that his portrait was
hung out as a sign for alehouses. "To sit with Tarleton on an ale-post's signe," observes Bishop Hall in his
satires. Oldys, in his M.S. notes, mentions that "There is an alehouse sign of a tabor and pipe man, with the
name of Tarleton under it, in the borough of Southwark, and it was taken from the print before the old 4to.
book of 'Tarleton's Jeasts;' and Lord Oxford had a portrait of him with his tabor and pipe, which was probably
taken from the pamphlet called 'Tarleton's Jeasts,' on the title page of which there is a wooden plate of
Tarleton, at full length in his Clown's dress, playing on his pipe with one hand, and beating his drum with the
other."
Italian Scenarios and English"Platts"—Pantaloon—Tarleton, theClown—Extemporal Comedy&md

51
These actors then (continues Mr. Disraeli), who were in the habit of exercising their impromptus, resembled
those who performed in the unwritten comedies of the Italians. Gabriel Harvey, the Aristarchus of the day,
compliments Tarleton for having brought forward a new species of dramatic exhibition. If this compliment
paid to Tarleton merely alludes to his dexterity at extemporaneous wit in the character of the Clown, as my
friend Mr. Douce thinks, this would be sufficient to show that he was attempting to introduce on our stage the
Extemporal Comedy of the Italians, which Gabriel Harvey distinguishes as "a new species." As for these
"Platts," which I shall not venture to call "Scenarios," they surprise by their bareness, conveying no notion of
the piece itself, though quite sufficient for the actors. They consist of mere exits and entrances of the actors,
and often the real names of the actors are familiarly mixed with those of the dramatis personae. Steevens has
justly observed, however, on these skeletons, that although "The drift of these dramatic pieces cannot be
collected from the mere outlines before us, yet we must not charge them with absurdity. Even the scenes of
Shakespeare would have worn as unpromising an aspect, had their skeletons only been discovered." The
printed Scenarios of the Italian theatre were not more intelligible; exhibiting only the hints for scenes.
Thus, I think, we have sufficient evidence of an intercourse subsisting between the English and Italian
theatres, not hitherto suspected; and I find an allusion to these Italian Pantomimes, by the great town-wit Tom
Nash, in his "Pierce Pennilesse," which shows that he was well acquainted with their nature. He, indeed,
exults over them, observing that our plays are "honourable and full of gallant resolution, not consisting, like
theirs, of Pantaloon, a Zany, and a w—-e (alluding to the women actors of the Italian stage); but of
emperors, kings, and princes." My conviction is still confirmed, when I find that Stephen Gosson wrote the
comedy of "Captain Mario;" it has not been printed, but "Captain Mario" is one of the Italian characters.
Even at a later period, the influence of these performances reached the greatest name in the English Parnassus.
One of the great actors and authors of these pieces, who published eighteen of these irregular productions, was
Andreini, whose name must have the honour of being associated with Milton's, for it was his comedy or opera
which threw the first spark of the "Paradise Lost" into the soul of the epic poet—a circumstance which
will hardly be questioned by those who have examined the different schemes and allegorical personages of the
first projected drama of "Paradise Lost": nor was Andreini, as well as many others of this race of Italian
dramatists, inferior poets. The Adamo of Andreini was a personage sufficiently original and poetical to serve
as the model of the Adam of Milton. The youthful English poet, at its representation, carried it away in his
mind. Wit, indeed, is a great traveller; and thus also the "Empiric" of Massinger might have reached us from
the Bolognese Dottore.
The late Mr. Hole, the ingenious writer on the "Arabian Nights," observed to me that Molière, it must be
presumed, never read Fletcher's plays, yet his "Bourgeois Gentilhomme," and the other's "Noble Gentleman,"
bear in some instances a great resemblance. Both may have been drawn from the same Italian source of
comedy which I have here indicated.
Many years after this article was written, appeared "The History of English Dramatic Poetry," by Mr. Collier.
That very laborious investigator has an article on "Extemporal Plays and Plots," iii., 393. The nature of these
"Platts" or "Plots," he observes, "Our theatrical antiquaries have not explained." The truth is that they never
suspected their origin in the Italian "Scenarios." My conjectures are amply confirmed by Mr. Collier's notices
of the intercourse of our players with the Italian actors. Whetstone's Heptameron, in 1582, mentions "The
comedians of Ravenna, who are not tied to any written device." In Kyd's Spanish Tragedy the Extemporal Art
is described:—
The Italian tragedians were so sharp of wit,

That in one hour of meditation
They would perform anything in action.

52
These Extemporal plays were witnessed much nearer than in Italy—at the Theâtre des Italiens at
Paris—for one of the characters replies:—
I have seen the like,

In Paris, among the French tragedians.
Ben Jonson has mentioned the Italian "Extemporal Plays," in his "Case is Altered"; and an Italian
commediante and his company were in London in 1578, who probably let our players into many a secret.
Evil times, with the advent of the Commonwealth, soon fell upon our theatres, and when they, as well as
plays, were suppressed by order of the Puritan Parliament, some of the actors followed the Royalist cause (we
do not hear of any taking the side of the Parliament), and lost their lives fighting for the king. Others
attempted to enact plays in secret, but these performances more often than not, caused the actors incarceration
in some prison. At Holland House, in Kensington, many of these secret performances, by the aid of bribery,
took place. To give timely warning of the performances Mr. Wright, in his "Historia Histronica," mentions
that "Alexander Goff, the woman-actor, was the jackal to give notice of time and place to the lovers of the
drama."
All this however, could not, and would not, keep the spirit of the drama alive. The theatres were, we know,
totally suppressed, "so there might be no more plaies acted." Play-goers there were, as I have shown, but they
never knew when, in witnessing a performance, they might be seized by the military, to be fined or
imprisoned, or perhaps both. A more lengthy reign of "Dramatic Terror" than what we had at this period,
would, in all probability, have left us little or no trace of the Drama of this country. But a saviour was at hand,
and that was Pantomime.
Pantomime, as previously stated, kept alive for ages, after the downfall of the Roman Empire, the Dramatic
Art, and during the Commonwealth of this country, it practically did the same for us.
Owing to the exigences of the times, one Robert Cox, an actor of considerable genius, after the fashion of the
Extemporal Comedies of Italy, invented a series of dramatic exhibitions at the Red Bull Theatre (where the
first English actress made her appearance December 8, 1660) and elsewhere, under the guise of rope-dancing,
a number of comic scenes from Shakespeare, Shirley, Marston, Beaumont, and Fletcher, and others. Cox's
exhibitions, known as "Humours" or "Drolleries," were collected by Marsh, and reprinted (1672) by Francis
Kirkman, the author and book-seller. This collection is entitled "The Wits, or Sport upon Sport, in select
pieces of Drollery, digested into scenes by way of dialogue. Together with variety of Humours of several
nations fitted for the pleasure and content of all persons, either in Court, City, Country, or Camp."
Of these "Humours" Kirkman observes, "As meanly as you may now think of these Drolls, they were then
acted by the best comedians; and, I may say, by some that then exceeded all now living; the incomparable
Robert Cox, who was not only the principal actor, but also the contriver and author of most of these farces.
How I have heard him cried up for his John Swabber, and Simpleton the Smith; in which he being to appear
with a large piece of bread and butter, I have frequently known several of the female spectators and auditors to
long for it; and once that well-known natural, Jack Adams of Clerkenwell, seeing him with bread and butter
on the stage, and knowing him, cried out, 'Cuz! Cuz! give me some!' to the great pleasure of the audience.
And so naturally did he act the smith's part, that being at a fair in a country town, and that farce being
presented the only master-smith of the town came to him, saying, 'Well, although your father speaks so ill of
you, yet when the fair is done, if you will come and work with me, I will give you twelve pence a week more
than I give any other journeyman.' Thus was he taken for a smith bred, that was, indeed, as much of any
trade."

53
With the death of the Lord Protector, Cromwell, "The merry rattle of Monk's drums coming up the Gray's Inn
Road, welcomed by thousands of dusty spectators," the return of Charles II., 1660, and though Charles was
more a lover of the stage than of the drama, the theatre again recovered its credit, and to vigorously flourish
once more.
CHAPTER XIV.
Introduction of Pantomimes to the English Stage—Weaver's

"History of the Mimes and Pantomimes"—Weaver's
Pantomimes—The prejudice against
Pantomimes—Booth's counsel.
The year 1702 marks the appearance of the first Pantomime introduced to the English stage, written by John
Weaver, a friend of Addison and Steele's, and entitled "Tavern Bilkers." It was produced at Drury Lane.
The author was by profession a dancing-master; his name is not to be found in any biographical dictionary,
yet, it is evident that the "little dapper, cheerful man" had brains in his head as well as talent in his heels.
John Weaver was the son of a Mr. Weaver, whom the Duke of Ormond, the Chancellor of Oxford, licensed in
1676 to exercise the profession of a dancing-master within the university. The date of his birth is unknown,
but we first hear of him as stage-managing the production of his own Pantomime at Drury Lane, 1702, an
entertainment which he described as one of "dancing, action, and motion." The latter would appear to have
been a failure, as in his "History of the Mimes and Pantomimes," published in 1728, Weaver states that his
next attempt on similar lines did not take place until many years afterwards—not until the year 1716, in
fact. In 1716 Weaver was back in London producing two burlesque Pantomimes, "The Loves of Mars and
Venus," and "Perseus and Andromeda." At Drury Lane, in the following year, "Orpheus and Eurydice," and
"Harlequin Turn'd Judge," was produced, and "Cupid and Bacchus" in 1719. Weaver also wrote many
treatises on dancing, some of which were highly commended by Steele.
Another Pantomime of Weaver's was "The Judgment of Paris"—date uncertain—performed by

the author's pupils "in the great room over the Market-house," Shrewsbury—in which town he had
taken up his residence—in the year 1750. John Weaver died September 28th, 1760, and was buried at
St. Chads, Shrewsbury.
The mention above of "Perseus and Andromeda" calls to mind that there were several pieces of this name.
One of them was severely commented on in "The Grub-Street Journal" of April 8, 1731. Its title
was:—"Perseus and Andromeda; or the Flying Lovers, in five Interludes, three serious and two comic.
The serious composed by Monsieur Roger, the comic by John Weaver, dancing-masters."
It is only just to assign to Weaver the entire credit of being the first to introduce Pantomimes on the English
stage, though the author's original bent was "scenical dancing," or ballet dancing, by representations of
historical incidents with graceful motion. In his "History of Pantomimes" the author is careful to distinguish
between those entertainments where "Grin and grimace usurp the passions and affections of the mind," and
CHAPTER XIV. 54
those where "A nice address and management of the passions take up the thoughts of the performer."
"Spectators," says Weaver, in 1730, or thereabouts, "are now so pandering away their applause on
interpolations of pseudo-players, merry Andrews, tumblers, and rope dancers; and are but rarely touched with,
or encourage a natural player or just Pantomime."
It was, however, left to John Rich to place Pantomime on a firm footing. Before dealing with Rich and his
Pantomimes, which I shall treat of in the next chapter, it is appropriate here to note how Pantomimes generally
came to be introduced on the English stage.
Colley Cibber mentions:—About this time the patentee (Rich) having very near finished his house in
Lincoln's Inn Fields, began to think of forming a new company; and, in the meantime, found it necessary to
apply for leave to employ them. By the weak defence he had always made against the several attacks upon his
interests, and former Government of the theatre (Drury Lane), it might be a question, if his house had been
ready, in the Queen's (Anne) time, whether he would then have had the spirit to ask, or interest enough to
obtain leave to use it; but in the following reign, as it did not appear he had done anything to forfeit the right
of his patent, he prevailed with Mr. Craggs, the younger, to lay his case before the king, which he did in so
effectual a manner that (as Mr. Craggs himself told me) his Majesty was pleased to say upon it, "That he
remembered when he had been in England before, in King Charles's time, there had been two theatres in
London; and as the patent seemed to be a lawful grant, he saw no reason why two play-houses might not be
continued."
The suspension of the patent being thus taken off, the younger multitude seemed to call aloud for two
play-houses! Many desired another, from the common notion, that two would always create emulation, in the
actors. Others too were as eager for them, from the natural ill-will that follows the fortunate or prosperous in
any undertaking. Of this low malevolence we had, now and then, remarkable instances; we had been forced to
dismiss an audience of a hundred and fifty pounds, from a disturbance spirited up, by obscure people, who
never gave any better reason for it than that it was their fancy to support the idle complaint of one rival actress
against another, in their several pretensions to the chief part in a new tragedy. But as this tumult seemed only
to be the wantonness of English liberty, I shall not presume to lay any further censure upon it.
Now, notwithstanding this public desire of re-establishing two houses; and though I have allowed the former
actors greatly our superiors; and the managers I am speaking of not to have been without their private errors,
yet under all these disadvantages, it is certain, the stage, for twenty years before this time, had never been in
so flourishing a condition.
But, in what I have said, I would not be understood to be an advocate for two play-houses; for we shall soon
find that two sets of actors, tolerated in the same place, have constantly ended in the corruption of the theatre;
of which the auxiliary entertainments, that have so barbarously supplied the defects of weak action, have, for
some years past, been a flagrant instance; it may not, therefore, be here improper to shew how our childish
Pantomimes first came to take so gross a possession of the stage.
I have upon several occasions, already observed, that when one company is too hard for another, the lower in
reputation has always been forced to exhibit fine newfangled foppery, to draw the multitude after them; of
these expedients, singing and dancing had formerly been most effectual; but, at the time I am speaking of, our
English music had been so discountenanced since the taste of Italian Operas prevailed, that it was to no
purpose to pretend to it. Dancing, therefore, was now the only weight, in the opposite scale, and as the new
theatre sometimes found their account in it, it could not be safe for us wholly to neglect it.
Cibber's antagonistical views towards Pantomime were shared, as we shall see, by a good many others.
Introduction of Pantomimes to the English Stage—Weaver's"History of the Mimes and Pantomimes"—W

55
Booth, however, a greater actor than Cibber, and a tragedian to boot, took a more business-like view of the
proceedings, thinking thin houses the greatest indignity the stage could suffer. "Men of taste and judgment
(said he) must necessarily form but a small proportion of the spectators at a theatre, and if a greater number of
people were enticed to sit out a play because a Pantomime was tacked to it, the Pantomime did good service to
all concerned. Besides, if people of position and taste could, if so minded, leave before the nonsense
commenced—an opportunity they do not seem to have embraced since Booth reminded the opponents
of Pantomime how Italian opera had drawn the nobility and gentry away from the play-houses, as appeared by
the melancholy testimony of their receipts, until Pantomime came to the rescue when pit and gallery were
better filled, and the boxes too put on a nobler appearance."
CHAPTER XV.
John Rich and his Pantomimes—Rich's

Miming—-Garrick, Walpole, Foote—Anecdotes of
Rich—Pope—The dance of infernals in "Harlequin
Sorcerer"—Drury Lane—Colley Cibber—Henry
Fielding, the Novelist—Contemporary Writers' opinion of
Pantomime—Woodward, the Harlequin—The meaning of
the word Actor—Harlequins—"Dr. Faustus," a
description—William Rufus
Chetwood—Accidents—Vandermere, the
Harlequin—"Orpheus and Eurydice" at Covent
Garden—A description—Sam. Hoole, the
machinist—Prejudice against Pantomime—Mrs.
Oldfield—Robert Wilks—Macklin—Riot at
Lincoln's Inn Fields Theatre—Death of Rich.
It was in 1717 that Rich devised this new form of entertainment, though it was not till 1724, when "The
Necromancer, or History of Dr. Faustus" was produced by Rich, which took the town by storm, that
Pantomime became such a rage. It has been stated that what induced Rich to turn his attention to Pantomime
was the bringing over of a German, named Swartz, who had two performing dogs that could dance. They were
engaged at £10 a night; and brought full houses. However, be this as it may, in the "Daily Courant," of
December 20, 1717, we find him, advertising for his "Italian Mimic Scenes"—as he, for long enough,
so termed his Pantomimes—as follows:—
"Harlequin Executed: a new Italian Mimic Scene between a

Scaramouch, a Harlequin, a Country Farmer, his Wife, and
others."
Of Rich and his early Pantomimes, Davies observes:—
CHAPTER XV. 56
John Rich was the son of Christopher Rich, formerly patentee of Drury Lane Theatre, and he imbibed from his
father a dislike of people with whom he was obliged to live and converse. His father wished to acquire wealth
by French dancers and Italian singers, than by the united skill of the most accomplished comedians. The son
inherited the same taste, and when he came into the patent, with his brother Christopher, of Drury Lane, and
after having ineffectually tried his talent for acting in the part of the Earl of Essex, and other important
characters, he applied himself to the study of Pantomimical representations at Lincoln's Inn Fields Theatre. To
retrieve the credit of his theatre Rich created a species of dramatic composition unknown to this, and, I
believe, to any other country, which he called Pantomime. It consisted of two parts, one serious, the other
comic; by the help of gay scenes, fine habits, grand dances, appropriate music, and other decorations, he
exhibited a story from "Ovid's Metamorphosis," or some other fabulous history. Between the pauses of the
acts he interwove a comic fable, consisting chiefly of the courtship of Harlequin and Columbine, with a
variety of surprising adventures and tricks, which were produced by the magic wand of Harlequin; such as the
sudden transformation of palaces and temples to huts and cottages; of men and women into wheelbarrows and
joint stools; of trees turned to houses; colonnades to beds of tulips; and mechanics' hops into serpents and
ostriches.
It is a most remarkable fact that the Pantomimes that Rich brought out, all of them could be written down as
successes. In the exhibition of his Pantomimes, Mr. Rich always displayed the greatest taste. He had also
acquired a considerable reputation as a performer of the motley hero under the name of "Lun Junr," as he was
so designated on the bills at that time, and he was the first performer who rendered the character of Harlequin
at all intelligible in this country. To others he taught the art of silent, but expressive, action, the interpreter of
the mind. Feeling was pre-eminent in his Miming; and he used to render the scene of a separation with
Columbine as graphic as it was affecting. Excellent were his "statue scenes" and his "catching the butterfly;"
so also were his other dumb show performances.
Of Rich, Garrick wrote:—
"When Lun appeared with matchless art and whim,

He gave the power of speech to every limb;
Though masked and mute conveyed his quick intent,
And told in frolic's gestures all he meant."
Rich, however, erred in thinking himself a better actor than a Pantomimist; and, in fact, he thought himself a
finer actor than the great Garrick himself. "You should see me play Richard!" was a favourite cry of his.
In 1782, after seeing the Pantomime of "Robinson Crusoe," Walpole said, "How unlike the Pantomimes of
Rich, which were full of wit, and coherent, and carried on by a story."
As I have shown above, Rich had, like many other people, his own particular little idiosyncrasies, and when in
the season 1746-7 he netted nearly £9,000 from his Pantomimes, to the chagrin of Garrick and Quin, he was
very angry and much annoyed because he, as Harlequin, had contributed little or nothing. Another mannerism
of his was to despise the regular drama on these occasions, and he has been known to look at the packed
audience through a small hole in the curtain, and then ejaculate, "Ah! you are there, you fools, are you? Much
good may it do you!"
Rich used to address everyone as "Mister." On one occasion Foote, being incensed at being so addressed,
asked Rich why he did not call him by his name. "Don't be angry," says Rich, "I sometimes forget my own
name." "I know," replied Foote, "that you can't write your own name, but I wonder you should forget it."
The first of Rich's successes was "Harlequin Sorcerer." On its production Pope wrote:—
John Rich and his Pantomimes—Rich'sMiming—-Garrick, Walpole, Foote—Anecdotes57

ofRich&m
"Behold a sober sorcerer rise
Swift to whose wand a winged volume flies;
All sudden, gorgon's hiss and dragon's glare,
And ten horned fiends and giants rush to war.
Hell rises, heaven descends, and dance on earth,
Gods, imps and monsters, music, rage and mirth,
A fire, a jig, a battle, and a ball,
Till one wide conflagration swallows all;
Thence a new world to nature's laws unknown,
Breaks out refulgent with a heaven its own;
Another Cynthia her new journey runs,
And other planets circle after suns.
The forests dance, the rivers upwards rise,
Whales sport in woods, and dolphins in the skies;
At last, to give the whole creation grace,
Lo! one vast egg produces human race."
Of Harlequin, in "Harlequin Sorcerer," being hatched from an egg by the rays of the sun. This has been called
a master-piece of Rich's Miming "From the first chipping of the egg (says Jackson) his receiving of motion,
his feeling of the ground, his standing upright, to his quick Harlequin trip round the empty shell, through the
whole progression, every limb had its tongue, and every motion a voice."
As probably occurring in "Harlequin Sorcerer," there is an amusing incident. The belief in the possibility of a
supernatural appearance on the stage existed (says an old writer) about the beginning of the eighteenth
century. A dance of infernals having to be exhibited, they were represented in dresses of black and red, with
fiery eyes and snaky locks, and garnished with every pendage of horror. They were twelve in number. In the
middle of their performance, while intent upon the figure in which they had been completely practised, an
actor of some humour, who had been accommodated with a spare dress, appeared among them. He was, if
possible, more terrific than the rest, and seemed to the beholders as designed by the conductor for the
principal fiend. His fellow furies took the alarm; they knew he did not belong to them, and they judged him an
infernal in earnest. Their fears were excited, a general panic ensued, and the whole group fled different ways;
some to their dressing-rooms, and others, through the streets, to their own homes, in order to avoid the
destruction which they believed to be coming upon them, for the profane mockery they had been guilty of.
The odd devil was non inventus. He took himself invisibly away, through fears of another kind. He was,
however, seen by many, in imagination, to fly through the roof of the house, and they fancied themselves
almost suffocated by the stench he had left behind. The confusion of the audience is scarcely to be described.
They retired to their families, informing them of this supposed appearance of the devil, with many of his
additional frolics in the exploit. So thoroughly was its reality believed that every official assurance which
could be made the following day did not entirely counteract the idea. The explanation was given by Rich
himself, in the presence of his friend Bencraft, the contriver, and perhaps the actor of the scheme, which he
designed only as an innocent affair, to confuse the dancers, without adverting to the serious consequences
which succeeded.
I have met with another author, who, in giving an account of this transaction, places it as a much earlier
period, and says it was during the performance of "Dr. Faustus," and that when the devil took flight he carried
away with him the roof of the theatre. This story may be alluded to in a very curious work, entitled, "The
Blacke Booke" (a proper depository), "London, printed in black letter, by T.C. for Jeffery Chorlton, 1604."
"The light burning serjant Lucifer" says of one, running away through fear of fire at a brothel, "Hee had a
head of hayre like one of my divells in 'Doctor Faustus,' when the olde theatre crakt and frighted the
audience."

ofRich&m
Emulating Rich, Drury Lane then followed with "Mars and Venus," of which Colley Cibber says: Was formed
into something more than motion without meaning into a connected presentation of dances in character,
wherein the passions were so happily expressed, and the whole story so intelligibly told by a mute narration of
gesture only, that even thinking spectators allowed it to be both a pleasing and a rational entertainment;
though, at the same time, from our distrust of its reception we durst not venture to decorate it with any
extraordinary expense of scenes or habits; but upon the success of this attempt it was rightly concluded that if
a visible expense in both were added to something of the same nature, it could not fail of drawing the town
proportionately after it.
From this original hint there (but every way unequal to it) sprang forth that succession of monstrous medlies,
that have so long infested the stage, and which arose upon one another alternately, at both houses, outvying in
expense, like contending bribes on both sides at an election, to secure a majority of the multitude.
If I am asked (after condemning these fooleries myself) how I came to assent or continue my share of expense
to them? I have no better excuse for my error, than confessing it. I did it against my conscience, and had not
virtue enough to starve by opposing a multitude that would have been too hard for me.
("The Drama's laws the Drama's patrons give," has always been an axiom of the stage; and worthy Colley
Cibber, notwithstanding his antagonism, and the rivalry of Rich, had too good a knowledge of this truism not
to do otherwise but follow the popular voice.)
Notwithstanding then (Cibber continues) this, our compliance with the vulgar taste, we generally made use of
these Pantomimes, but as crutches to our weakest plays. Nor were we so lost to all sense of what was
valuable, as to dishonor our best authors in such bad company. We still had a due respect to several select
plays, that were able to be their own support; and in which we found constant account, without painting and
patching them out.... It is a reproach to a sensible people to let folly so quickly govern their pleasures.
Henry Fielding, the novelist, was one of Harlequin's assailants. "The comic part of the English Pantomimes,"
he says, "being duller than anything before shown on the stage could only be set off by the superlative dulness
of the serious portion, in which the gods and goddesses were so insufferably tedious, that Harlequin was
always a relief from still worse company." Eager for theatrical reform, the "Weekly Miscellany" of 1732, said
that plays were not intended for tradesmen, and denounced Pantomimes as infamous.
Another competitor, who entered the lists against Rich, was Thormond, a dancing-master, and at Drury Lane
Theatre he produced "Dr. Faustus," in 1733. Speaking of this Pantomime, Pasquin mentions that "An account
is very honestly published, to save people the trouble of going to see it."
In a Pantomime produced at Drury Lane in the following year, there were Macklin, Theo. Cibber (who
ultimately lost his life by shipwreck in the Irish Sea, in company with a troupe of Pantomimists), Mrs. Clive,
and Mrs. Cibber. At the performance it was announced that the money paid would be returned to anyone who
went out before the overture; but no one availed themselves of the concession. Commenting on the
occurrence, a contemporary writer observes:—"Happy is it that we live in an age of taste, when the
dumb eloquence and natural wit and humour of Harlequin are justly preferred to the whining of Tragedy, or
the vulgarity of Comedy."
Garrick, at Drury Lane, finding his audience with no heart for tragedy, and that they must have Pantomime,
very wisely said, "If you won't come to 'Lear' and 'Hamlet,' I must give you Harlequin." And Harlequin he did
give them, in the person of Woodward, one of the best of Harlequins that ever trod the stage. A contemporary
print of the time, represents Woodward being weighed in one scale, with all the great actors of the day in the
other, and Woodward makes them all kick the beam.

ofRich&m
To satirise the prevailing fashion, Garrick penned the following:—
They in the drama find no joys,

But doat on mimicry and toys;
Thus, when a dance is on my bill,
Nobility my boxes fill;
Or send three days before the time
To crowd a new-made Pantomime.
Garrick's success, however, was, I am of opinion, undoubtedly owing to his being such a clever Pantomimist.
"We saw him," says Grimm, "play the dagger scene in 'Macbeth' in a room in his ordinary dress, without any
stage illusion; and, as he followed with his eyes the air-drawn dagger, he became so grand that the assembly
broke into a cry of general admiration. Who would believe that this same man, a moment after, counterfeited,
with equal perfection, a pastry cook's boy, who, carrying a tray of tartlets on his head, and gaping about him at
the corner of the street, lets his tray fall, and, at first stupified by the accident, bursts at last into a fit of
crying?"
All our great actors have been good Mimics, and herein, doubtless, lies the secret of their success. The mere
intonation of words unaccompanied by a strict knowledge of "that dumb, silent language," Pantomime, is only
parroting. Herein, therefore, lies the true imitativeness of the actor, and the natural form of acting. The word
actor "Is a name only given to the persons in a dramatic work, because they ought to be in continual action
during the performance of it." It does not mean that the actor is to stand still, and to be in action only with his
tongue when speaking his "lines." No! he bears the honoured name of actor, and he should bring the full
power of gesture language—Pantomime—that he has at his control into play in order to be
convincing in the character that, for the time being, he is.
Action (mentions Betterton, in his "History of the English Stage," 1741), can never be in its perfection but on
the stage. Action, indeed, has a natural excellence in it superior to all other qualities; action is motion, and
motion is the support of nature, which without it would sink into the sluggish mass of chaos. Life is motion,
and when that ceases, the human body so beautiful, nay so divine, when enlivened by motion, becomes a dead
and putrid corpse, from which all turn their eyes. The eye is caught by anything in motion, but passes over the
sluggish and motionless things as not the pleasing object of its view.
The natural power of motion, or action, is the reason that the attention of the audience is fixed by any
irregular, or even fantastic action, on the stage, of the most indifferent player; and supine and drowsy when
the best actor speaks without the addition of action. The stage ought to be the seat of passion in its various
kinds, and, therefore, the actors ought to be thoroughly acquainted with the whole nature of the affections, and
habits of the mind, or else they will never be able to express them justly in their looks and gestures, as well as
in the tone of their voice and manner of utterance. They must know them in their various mixtures, as they are
differently blended together in the different characters they represent; and then that excellent rule in the
"Essay on Poetry" will be of equal use to the poet and player:—
Who must look within to find

These secret turns of Nature in the mind;
Without this part in vain would be the whole,
And but a body all without a soul?
A few words more just to lay further stress on the importance of Pantomime, and then to return to our History.
Take any part in any play, strip from it in its enactment the whole of its gesture language, could we realise that
the actor appearing in it was portraying nature for us? Replace the Pantomime so essential to the part, and the
character becomes—or rather should become if properly played—a creature of flesh and blood

ofRich&m
the same as ourselves. Pantomime, on the other hand, does not require words to be spoken to express its
meaning, as it is quite expressible without.
A contemporary account of the production of the Pantomime "Harlequin Dr. Faustus," at Drury Lane Theatre,
forms interesting reading, in addition to providing a contrast with present-day Pantomime.
Every action is executed to different agreeable music, so adapted that it properly expresses what is going
forward; in the machinery there is something so highly surprising that words cannot give a full idea of it. The
effects described seem to be marvellous, considering the state of theatrical mechanism. A devil riding on a
fiery dragon rides swiftly across the stage. Two country men and women enter to be told their fortunes, when
Dr. Faustus waves his wand, and four pictures turn out of the scenes opposite, representing a judge and a
soldier, a dressed lady, and a lady in riding habit; the scene changes to the outside of a handsome house, when
the louting men, running in, place their backs against the door. The front of the house turns, and at the same
instant the machine turns, a supper ready dressed rises up. The countrymen's wives remain with the Doctor,
who (afterwards) goes out. He beckons the table, and it follows him. Punch, Scaramouch, and Pierrot are next
met by the Doctor, who invites them into a banquet. The table ascends into the air. He waves his wand, and
asses' ears appear at the sides of their heads. A usurer lending money to Dr. Faustus demands a limb as
security, and cuts off the Doctor's leg, several legs appear on the scene, and the Doctor strikes a woman's leg
with his wand, which immediately flies from the rest, and fixes to the Doctor's stump, who dances with it
ridiculously. The next scene opens, disclosing the Doctor's study. He enters affrighted, and the clock strikes
one; the figures of Time and Death appear. Several devils enter and tear him in pieces, some sink, some fly
out, each bearing a limb of him. The last, which is the grand scene, is the most magnificent that ever appeared
on the English stage—all the gods and goddesses discovered with the apotheosis of Diana, ascending
into the air.
The tricks that formed part and parcel of the Pantomimes, in causing surprise and wonderment, placed
Harlequin, for his extraordinary feats, in the first rank of magicians. Oftentimes, however, they were the cause
of many accidents.
Chetwood—William Rufus Chetwood—who had, in the eighteenth century, a bookseller's shop

in Covent Garden, and was, for twenty years, prompter for Drury Lane, a writer of four plays, and a volume of
sketches of the actors whom he had met, says:—"A tumbler at the Haymarket beat the breath out of his
body by an accident, and which raised such vociferous applause that lasted the poor man's life, for he never
breathed more. Indeed, his wife had this comfort, when the truth was known, pity succeeded to the roar of
applause. Another accident occurred in the Pantomime of 'Dr. Faustus' (previously referred to), at Lincoln's
Inn Fields Theatre, where a machine in the working threw the mock Pierrot down headlong with such force
that the poor man broke a plank on the stage with his fall, and expired; another was sorely maimed that he did
not survive many days; and a third, one of the softer sex, broke her thigh."
Vandermere, the Harlequin, one of the most agile that ever trod the stage, on one occasion, in the pursuit by
the Clown, leaped through a window on to the stage, a full thirteen feet. Performing at the Dublin theatre one
night, having a prodigious leap to make, the persons behind the scenes not being ready to receive him in the
customary blanket, he fell upon the stage and was badly bruised. This accident occasioned him to take a
solemn oath that he would never take another leap upon the stage; nor did he violate his oath, for when he
afterwards played Harlequin another actor of his size, and of considerable activity was equipped with the
parti-coloured habit, and when a leap was necessary Vandermere passed off on one side of the stage as
Dawson—Vandermere's understudy—entered at the other, and undertook it.
How little do we know of the tragic ending of these poor unhappy Pantomimists' lives. Their names even have
not been handed down to us, and they, like probably many more with whose quips and quiddities we have
laughed at with infinite zest, have long since gone "to that bourne from whence no traveller returns," and

ofRich&m
perhaps, "unwept, unhonoured, and unsung."
On February 12, 1739, Rich produced, at Covent Garden (opened in December 1732, with Congreve's "Way
of the World"), "Orpheus and Eurydice." On the mounting something like £2,000 were spent.
Rich devised the scenario and comic scenes. Lewis Theobald wrote the libretto, and George
Lambert—founder of the Beefsteak Club—painted the scenery. Hippisley played Clown,
Manager Rich was the Harlequin, and Signor Grimaldi, father of the celebrated Mime, to be noted further on,
was the Pantaloon. This is the first instance of a member of the Grimaldi family (says Mr. W.J. Lawrence)
appearing in English Pantomime.
The following was the argument and the curious arrangement of the scenes:—Interlude
I.—Rhodope, Queen of Thrace, practising art magic, makes love to Orpheus. He rejects her love. She is
enraged. A serpent appears who receives Rhodope's commands, and these ended, glides off the stage. Here the
comic part begins. In the Opera (as practically it was) a scene takes place between Orpheus and Eurydice.
Eurydice's heel is pierced by the serpent, behind the scenes. She dies on the stage—after which the
comic part is continued. Interlude II. Scene: Hell. Pluto and Orpheus enter. Orpheus prevails on Pluto to
restore Eurydice to him. Ascalox tells Orpheus that Eurydice shall follow him, but that if he should look back
at her before they shall have passed the bounds of Hell, she will die again. Orpheus turns back to look for
Eurydice, Fiends carry her away. After this the comic part is resumed. Interlude III.—Orpheus again
rejects Rhodope's solicitations. Departs. The scene draws, and discovers Orpheus slain. Several Baccants enter
in a triumphant manner. They bring in the lyre and chaplet of Orpheus. Rhodope stabs herself. The piece
concludes with the remainder of the comic part.
"'The Scots Magazine' for March, 1740, says:—'Orpheus and Eurydice' draws the whole town to
Covent Garden, whether for the Opera itself (the words of which are miserable stuff) or for the Pantomimical
Interlude, with which it is intermixed, I cannot determine. The music is pretty good, and the tricks are not
foolisher than usual, and some have said that they have more meaning than most that have preceded them. The
performance is grand as to the scenery. What pleases everybody is a regular growth of trees, represented more
like nature than what has yet been seen upon the stage, and the representation of a serpent so lively as to
frighten half the ladies who see it. It is, indeed, curious in its kind, being wholly a piece of machinery, that
enters, performs its exercise of head, body, and tail in a most surprising manner, and makes behind the curtain
with a velocity scarcely credible. It is about a foot and a half in circumference of the thickest part, and far
exceeds the former custom of stuffing a bag into such likeness. It is believed to have cost more than £200; and
when the multitude of wings, springs, etc., whereof it consists, are considered, the charge will not appear
extravagant. The whole Royal family have been to see this performance; and, from what can be judged,
everybody else will see it before the end of the season, the house being every day full at 3 o'clock, though
seldom empty till after eleven."
Sam Hoole—father of the translator of Tasso and Ariosto—was Rich's chief machinist at this
period, and the inventor of this famous serpent. He had, according to Cumberland, a shop where he sold
mechanical toys. Having a large stock of serpent toys left on his hands he became a ruined and bankrupt man.
"Orpheus and Eurydice" was revived by Rich in 1747, and again in 1755; when it ran 31 nights. In 1768 it
was reproduced by his successors at Covent Garden. In October, 1787, it was again put in the bill, and this
time by Royal Command, it was said.
Of the number of Pantomimes brought out by Rich I shall not dilate on, and those that I have referred to will,
doubtless, show what all these "plays without words" were like.
During the summer season of 1761, at Drury Lane, Murphy and Foote endeavoured

ofRich&m
"From Pantomime to free the stage

And combat all the ministers of the age,"
by ridiculing the popular amusement in having the character of Harlequin hung in full view of the audience in
a play entitled "The Wishes." When the catastrophe was at hand Murphy whispered to Cumberland: "If they
don't damn this, they deserve to be damned themselves!" No sooner were the words uttered than a turbulent
mob in the pit broke out, and quickly put an end to the dire fatality with which Pantomime and its hero,
Harlequin, were threatened.
Christopher Rich gave the first engagement to the afterwards celebrated actress, Mrs. Oldfield, and,
previously, a similar kindness to Robert Wilks, about the year 1690, at the salary of fifteen shillings a week,
with two shillings and sixpence deducted for teaching him to dance. Another famous performer, Macklin, was
also introduced to the stage by this family.
At the Lincoln's Inn Fields Theatre, in 1721, there was a memorable riot, caused by some drunken aristocratic
beaux, owing to an alleged insult, which one of their number was supposed to have received. The beau
referred to, a noble Earl, had crossed the stage whilst Macbeth and his lady were upon it, in order to speak to a
companion who was lolling in the wings. Rich told the noble Earl that for his indecorum he would not be
allowed behind the scenes again, which so incensed the latter that he gave Manager Rich a smart slap on the
face, which Rich returned. Swords then were drawn, and between the actors and the beaux a free fight ensued,
which ended in the former driving the latter out of the theatre. The rioters, however, again obtained access,
and rushing into the boxes, cut down the hangings, besides doing other damage, when, led by Quin and a
number of constables, several of the beaux were captured, and taken before the magistrates. The end of it all
was that the matter was compromised; but, in order to prevent a recurrence of such disorderly scenes, a guard
should attend the performances. The custom of having the military in attendance at our theatres—which
the above affray was the primary cause—was in vogue for over a hundred years after this event.
Rich lived to see Pantomimes firmly established at Drury Lane and Covent Garden. Drury Lane did, for a few
years, discard it in favour of spectacle, but ultimately found it advisable to return to Pantomime.
At the beginning of the 'sixties of the eighteenth century—1761—died the father of Harlequins
in England, and also—as he has been called—of English Pantomimes, and there is, I believe, a
costly tomb erected to his memory in Hillingdon Church-yard, Middlesex.
Rich left Covent Garden Theatre to his son-in-law, Beard, the vocalist, with the not unpleasant restriction,
however, that the property should be sold when £60,000 was bid for it, and for which sum it ultimately passed
into the hands of Harris, Colman, and their partners.
CHAPTER XVI.
CHAPTER XVI. 63
Joseph Grimaldi.
The year 1778 marks an epoch in the History of Pantomime, as just over three-quarters of a century before
marked another epoch, the introduction of Pantomimes to the English stage. On December 18th, 1778, was
born Joseph Grimaldi—afterwards the Prince of Clowns, and the son of Giuseppe Grimaldi ("Iron
Legs"). Joe's first appearance was at Sadler's Wells on April 16, Easter Monday, 1781, he not being quite
three years old. Dickens, in the "Memoirs of Grimaldi," has given us from the Clown's own diary, which
Grimaldi kept close up to the time of his death, on May, 31st, 1837, a full and true account of the life of this
remarkably clever Pantomimist. To add to what Dickens has written of "Only a Clown" (which doubtless the
reader is already acquainted with) would only be like painting the lily; and, perhaps, I cannot do better in
honouring his memory than by quoting the words of Mr. Harley at the annual dinner of the Drury Lane Fund,
spoken in the June following Grimaldi's death:—"Yet, shall delicacy suffer no violence in adducing
one example, for death has hushed his cock-crowing cachination, and uproarious merriment. The mortal
Jupiter of practical Joke, the Michael Angelo of buffoonery, who, if he was Grim-all-day, was sure to make
you chuckle at night."
A contemporary writer of Grimaldi's days thus eulogises the Prince of Clowns:—
As a Clown, Mr. Grimaldi is perfectly unrivalled. Other performers of the part may be droll in their
generation; but, which of them can for a moment compete with the Covent Garden hero in acute observation
upon the foibles and absurdities of society, and his happy talent of holding them up to ridicule. He is the finest
practical satyrist that ever existed. He does not, like many Clowns, content himself with raising a horse-laugh
by contortions and grimaces, but tickles the fancy, and excites the risibility of an audience by devices as
varied as they are ingenious. "He uses his folly as a stalking-horse, under cover of which he shoots his wit;"
and fully deserves the encomium bestowed upon him by Kemble, who, it is said, pronounced him to be "the
best low comedian upon the stage."
There are few things, we think, more delightful than a Pantomime—that is, a good Pantomime, such as
is usually produced at Covent Garden. We know there are a set of solemn pompous mortals about town, who
express much dignified horror at the absurdities of these things, and declaim very fluently, in good set terms,
upon the necessity of their abolition. Such fellows as these are ever your dullest of blockheads. Conscious of
their lack of ideas, they think to earn the reputation of men of sterling sense, by inveighing continually against
what they deem to be frivolity; while they only expose more clearly to all observers the sad vacuum which
exists in their pericraniums. Far, far from us be such dullards, and such opinions; and let us continue to laugh
heartily at our Pantomimes, undisturbed by their tedious harangues; "Do they think, because they are wise,
there shall be no more cakes and ale?" The man who refuses to smile at the humours of Grimaldi is made of
bad materials—hic niger est—let no such man be trusted!
Can there possibly be a more captivating sight than that which the theatre presents nightly, of hundreds of
beautiful children all happy and laughing, "as if a master-spring constrained them all;" and filled with delight,
unalloyed and unbounded, at the performance of one man? And shall that man go without his due meed of
praise? Never be it said! No, Joey! When we forget thee, may our right hand forget its cunning! We owe thee
much for the delight thou hast already afforded us; and rely upon thee, with confident expectation, for many a
future hour of gay forgetfulness. Well do we remember, in our boyish dreams of bliss, how prominent a
feature thou didst stand amongst the anticipated enjoyments of Christmas; how the thoughts of home, of
kindred, and release from school, were rendered ten-fold more delightful by the idea of thy motley garb and
mirth-inspiring voice, which ever formed the greatest enjoyment our holidays afforded. Heaven be praised, we
still are children in some respects, for we still feel gladdened by thy gambols, as heartily as we did years ago,
when we made our periodical escape from the terrors of our old pedagogue's frown, and went with Aunt
Bridget ("Happier than ourselves the while") to banquet upon the Pantomimic treat provided for us. "All
Joseph Grimaldi. 64
wisdom is folly," says the philosopher; but we often incline to think the converse of the proposition correct,
when we see thee put thy antic disposition on, and set the audience in a roar by the magic of thy powers.
It is thought by many persons that Grimaldi is seen to greater advantage on the small stage of Sadler's Wells,
than on the more capacious one of Covent Garden; but, this is an opinion with which we cannot coincide. He
always appears to us more at his ease at the latter house; to come forth exulting in his power, and exclaiming,
"Ay, marry, here my soul hath elbow-room." His engagement there has certainly been a lucrative speculation
for the proprietors. "Mother Goose," we believe, drew more money than any other piece which has been
produced during the present century; and no Pantomime since brought forward at Covent Garden has been
unsuccessful; which is mainly to be attributed to his inimitable performance of Clown. It is scarcely possible
for language to do justice to his unequalled powers of gesture and expression. Do our readers recollect a
Pantomime some years ago, in which he was introduced begging a tart from a pieman? The simple expression,
"May I?" with the look and action which accompanied it, are impressed upon our recollection, as forming one
of the finest pieces of acting we ever witnessed. Indeed, let the subject be what it may, it never fails to become
highly amusing in the hands of Grimaldi; whether it is to rob a pieman, or open an oyster, imitate a
chimney-sweep, or a dandy, grasp a red-hot poker, or devour a pudding, take snuff, sneeze, make love, mimic
a tragedian, cheat his master, pick a pocket, beat a watchman, or nurse a child, it is all performed in so
admirably humorous and extravagantly natural a manner, that spectators of the most saturnine disposition are
irresistibly moved to laughter.
Mr. Grimaldi also possesses great merit in Pantomimic performances of a different character, which all are
aware of, who have ever seen him in the melodrama, called "Perouse," and other pieces of the same
description.
We cannot better terminate this article, than with a poetical tribute to his powers, addressed to him by one of
the authors of "Horace in London," who appears to have had a true relish of his subject:—
Facetious Mime! thou enemy of gloom,

Grandson of Momus, blithe and debonair,
Who, aping Pan, with an inverted broom,
Can'st brush the cobwebs from the brows of care.
Our gallery gods immortalize thy song;

Thy Newgate thefts impart ecstatic pleasure;
Thou bid'st a Jew's harp charm a Christian throng,
A Gothic salt-box teem with attic treasure.
When Harlequin, entangled in thy clue,

By magic seeks to dissipate the strife,
Thy furtive fingers snatch his faulchion too;
The luckless wizard loses wand and wife.
The fabled egg from thee obtains its gold;

Thou sett'st the mind from critic bondage loose,
Where male and female cacklers, young and old,
Birds of a feather, hail the sacred Goose.
Even pious souls, from Bunyan's durance free,

At Sadler's Wells applaud thy agile wit,
Forget old Care while they remember thee,
"Laugh the heart's laugh," and haunt the jovial pit.
Joseph Grimaldi. 65
Long may'st thou guard the prize thy humour won,

Long hold thy court in Pantomimic state,
And, to the equipoise of English fun,
Exalt the lowly, and bring down the great.
Again we are told "That his Pantomime was such that you could fancy he would have been the Pulcinello of
the Italians, the Harlequin of the French, that he could have returned a smart repartee from Carlin. His
motions, eccentric as they were, were evidently not a mere lesson from the gymnasium; there was a will and
mind overflowing with, nay living upon fun, real fun. He was so extravagantly natural, that the most saturnine
looker-on acknowledged his sway; and neither the wise, the proud, or the fair, the young nor the old, were
ashamed to laugh till tears coursed down their cheeks at Joe and his comicalities."
Grimaldi used sometimes to play in two different Pantomimes at two different theatres, when he would have
to go through some twenty scenes.
Unlike the painting of the face with a few patches adopted by the modern Clown, Grimaldi used to give one
the idea of a greedy boy, who had covered himself with jam in robbing from a cupboard. Grimaldi dressed the
part like a Clown should be dressed. His trousers were large and baggy, and were fastened to his jacket, and
round his neck he wore a schoolboy's frill—part of the dress, in all probability, borrowed from the
Spanish Captain and the French Pierrot.
At Drury Lane on Friday, June 27, 1828, he took his farewell benefit. The following being the bill:—
Mr. Grimaldi's Farewell Benefit, On Friday, June 27th, 1828, will be performed JONATHAN IN ENGLAND,
after which A MUSICAL MELANGE, To be succeeded by THE ADOPTED CHILD, and concluded by
HARLEQUIN HOAX, In which Mr. Grimaldi will act Clown in one scene, sing a song, and speak his
FAREWELL ADDRESS.
With the reader's permisson, I will give, from his "Memoirs," the address he spoke:—
"Ladies and Gentlemen:—In putting off the Clown's garment, allow me to drop also the Clown's
taciturnity, and address you in a few parting sentences. I entered early on this course of life, and leave it
prematurely. Eight-and-forty years only have passed over my head—but I am going as fast down the
hill of life as that older Joe—John Anderson. Like vaulting ambition, I have overleaped myself, and
pay the penalty in an advanced old age. If I have now any aptitude for tumbling it is through bodily infirmity,
for I am worse on my feet than I used to be on my head. It is four years since I jumped my last
jump—filched my last oyster—boiled my last sausage—and set in for retirement. Not
quite so well provided for, I must acknowledge, as in the days of my Clownship, for then, I dare say, some of
you remember, I used to have a fowl in one pocket and sauce for it in the other.
"To-night has seen me assume the motley for a short time—it clung to my skin as I took it off, and the
old cap and bells rang mournfully as I quitted them for ever.
"With the same respectful feelings as ever do I find myself in your presence—in the presence of my
last audience—this kindly assemblage so happily contradicting the adage that a favourite has no
friends. For the benvolence that brought you hither—accept, ladies and gentlemen, my warmest and
most grateful thanks, and believe, that of one and all, Joseph Grimaldi takes a double leave, with a farewell on
his lips, and a tear in his eyes.
Joseph Grimaldi. 66
"Farewell! That you and yours may ever enjoy that greatest earthly good—health, is the sincere wish of
your faithful and obliged servant. God bless you all!"
Poor Joe was buried in the burying-ground of St. James' Chapel, on Pentonville Hill, and in a grave next to his
friend, Charles Dibdin. May the earth lie lightly over him!
CHAPTER XVII.
Plots of the old form of Pantomimes—A description of

"Harlequin and the Ogress; or the Sleeping Beauty of the Wood,"
produced at Covent Garden—Grimaldi, Père et Fils—Tom
Ellar, the Harlequin, and Barnes, the Pantaloon—An account of
the first production of the "House that Jack built," at Covent
Garden—Spectacular display—Antiquity and Origin of
some Pantomimic devices—Devoto, Angelo, and French, the
Scenic
Artists—Transparencies—Beverley—Transformation
Scenes.
Of the plots of the old form of Pantomime and what these entertainments were generally like, graphically,
does Planché describe them.
How different (he says) were the Christmas Pantomimes of my younger days. A pretty story—a nursery
tale—dramatically told, in which "the course of true love never did run smooth," formed the opening;
the characters being a cross-grained old father, with a pretty daughter, who had two suitors—one a poor
young fellow, whom she preferred, the other a wealthy fop, whose pretensions were, of course, favoured by
the father. There was also a body servant of some sort in the old man's establishment. At the moment when
the young lady was about to be forcibly married to the fop she despised, or, on the point of eloping with the
youth of her choice, the good fairy made her appearance, and, changing the refractory pair into Harlequin and
Columbine, the old curmudgeon into Pantaloon, and the body servant into Clown: the two latter in company
with the rejected "lover," as he was called, commenced the pursuit of the happy pair, and the "comic business"
consisted of a dozen or more cleverly constructed scenes, in which all the tricks and changes had a meaning,
and were introduced as contrivances to favour the escape of Harlequin and Columbine, when too closely
followed by their enemies. There was as regular a plot as might be found in a melodrama. An interest in the
chase which increased the admiration of the ingenuity and the enjoyment of the fun of the tricks, by which the
runaways escaped capture, till the inevitable "dark scene" came, a cavern or a forest, in which they were
overtaken, seized, and the magic wand, which had so uniformly aided them, snatched from the grasp of the
despairing Harlequin, and flourished in triumph by the Clown. Again at the critical moment the protecting
fairy appeared, and, exacting the consent of the father to the marriage of the devoted couple, transported the
whole party to what was really a grand last scene, which everybody did wait for. There was some congruity,
some dramatic construction, in such Pantomimes; and then the acting. For it was acting, and first-rate acting.
CHAPTER XVII. 67
To give the reader a further insight into the old form of Christmas Pantomimes, I cull the following from "The
Drama," a contemporary magazine of the period (1822):—
In compliance with the long-established custom of gratifying the holiday visitors of the theatres with
Pantomimic representations at this season of year, a new piece of that description was produced at this theatre
(Covent Garden) last night, December 26th, 1822, under the title of "Harlequin and the Ogress; or the
Sleeping Beauty of the Wood." The introductory story is taken from the well-known tale of "The Sleeping
Beauty," in "Mother Bunch's Fairy Tales," which had before been "melodramatised," but had not hitherto been
taken for the groundwork of a Harlequinade.
The piece opens in one of the fabled grand caverns under the Pyramids of Egypt, in which the three fatal
sisters of Mother Bunch's Mythology are seen spinning and winding a ball of golden thread, the fastening of
which to the wrist of the Sleeping Beauty is intended to add another century to the duration of her life, and of
the power which the Ogress, or Fairy, has exercised over her, and her possessions, for the preceding hundred
years. The ball having been completed, with the due quantum of magic incantation in such cases prescribed, is
consigned to the care of Grim Gribber, the porter of the castle, with directions to attach it to the wrist of the
lady in the chamber of sleep, whither he accordingly proceeds for that purpose; but overcome by the soporific
influences of the atmosphere of that enchanted place, he falls into a deep sleep ere his task is accomplished.
The Prince Azoff, with his Squire Abnab, straying from a hunting party into the enchanted cedar grove,
encounters the Fairy Blue-bell, protector of the Sleeping Beauty, who imparts to the Prince the story of her
enchantment, furnishes him with a magic flower to protect him from the influence of the Ogress, and instructs
him in the means of releasing the Beauty at the expiration of the term of her first enchanted sleep, which is
then drawing to a close. In the amazement which seizes the Prince on finding himself in the chamber of sleep,
at the splendour of everything around him, and the sight of the Sleeping Beauty with her surrounding train of
attendants, whose faculties are all enchained in the same preternatural slumber, he lets fall the magic flower,
and becomes thereby subject to the power of the Ogress, from which he is, however, rescued on the instant by
the protecting interference of the Fairy Blue-bell. But in punishment of his neglect, he is condemned to
wander for a time in search of happiness with the now-awakened Beauty, pursued by the relentless Ogress and
her servant, Grim Gribber. The whole of the persons engaged in the scene now undergo the prescriptive
Pantomimic changes, and the ordinary succession of Harlequinade adventures, tricks, and transformations
ensue.
Our old favourites, the Grimaldis, father and son, Mr. Ellar as Harlequin, and Mr. Barnes as Pantaloon, were
hailed, on their appearance, with the warmth of greeting to which their excellence in their several parts fully
entitles them, and displayed their wonted drollery, gracefulness, and agility: and Miss Brissak, who, for the
first time, appeared as Columbine, acquitted herself with tolerable credit, and was very well received.
The scenery in general was marked with that characteristic beauty and highly-finished excellence, which have
long distinguished the productions of this theatre: and the panoramic series of views of the River Thames,
from Greenwich to the Nore, on the passage of the Royal flotilla for Scotland, and its arrival in Leith Roads,
probably surpass everything of the kind before exhibited. There are several diverting tricks and ingenious
changes. Grimaldi's equipment of a patent safety coach at Brighton, in particular was highly amusing. The
machinery, which is, in many instances, of a most complicated description, worked remarkably well for a first
night's exhibition; and the whole went off with a degree of eclat, which must have been exceedingly
gratifying to the managers, as auguring the probability of such a lengthened run for the piece as may amply
recompense the pains and expense which have been so lavishly bestowed in its preparation. The house was
filled in every part, and the announcement of the Pantomime's repetition was received with the most
clamorous approbation, undisturbed by a single dissentient voice.
The first production of "The House that Jack Built," at Covent Garden, on December 26, 1824, also reads
interestingly:—
Plots of the old form of Pantomimes—A description of"Harlequin and the Ogress; or the Sleeping Beauty
68 of the
The Pantomime is before us, and we should ill-repay the pleasure it afforded us, if we did not acknowledge
and make public its excellence. The name implies the source from which it is taken, and we had, therefore, the
supreme pleasure of renewing our friendship with those very old acquaintances, the "Priest all shaven and
shorn, the maiden all forlorn, the cow with the crumpled horn, the dog that worried the cat, that killed the rat,
that eat up the malt, that lay in the House that Jack built." This, of course, gave us, as it appeared to do many
others, great pleasure, "For should auld acquaintance be forgot, and never brought to mind." Mr. Farley,
however, who supports (like an Atlas) all the weight of bringing forward these annual pieces of fun and
foolery, and who appears to be as learned in the mystic lore of "hoary antiquity," as he is in the mysteries of
all the wonders of the tricks, changes, and mechanism of the Pantomimic world, has let us this time into a
secret, which will doubtless cause much erudite argument, and pros and cons from various sage antiquarians
for months to come, in that invaluable work of old Sylvanus Urban, 'yclept the "Gentlemen's Magazine." As
the play-bills on which this important piece of information is to be found, will doubtless be bought up by all
the mystogogii of the Metropolis, and shortly become scarce, we shall take the liberty of inserting it in our
imperishable pages, for the benefit, not only of posterity, but for those of our own day, who are infected with
the building mania, and who, we think, ought to make Mr. Farley some very valuable present to mark their
sense of the obligation they are under to him, in consequence of the benefit which must accrue to them from
it. It appears from this fragment in what manner Jack became possessed of his house, and which it never
before occurred to us, to enquire. Thus then the mystery is elucidated by Mr. Farley.
Jack's Wager;
"By virtue of one of our forest charters, if a man do build a dwelling upon common land, from sun-set to
sun-rise, and enclose a piece of ground, wherein there shall be a tree growing, a beast feeding, a fire kindled,
and provision in the pot, such dwelling shall be freely held by the builder, anything to the contrary,
nevertheless, notwithstanding." Forest Laws.
Accordingly Jack, in the opening scene, is represented just before nightfall, as completing his dwelling, by
putting on the chimney pot as the finishing stroke; he then claims his bride, Rosebud, from her father, Gaffer
Gandy, who refuses his consent, having determined on bestowing her hand on one Squire Sap. Jack, in
despair, repairs to Poor Robin, the village astrologer, who is intently observing an eclipse of the moon (which,
by-the-bye, is most excellently managed), and relates his griefs. The old man cheers his drooping spirits, by
casting his nativity and finding by his observations, that Jack's stars are of the most benign influence, and that
all his wishes shall be fulfilled. The marriage of the maiden all forlorn with the Squire is on the point of being
completed, when Venus (one of whose doves had been preserved by Jack) dispatches Cupid to the assistance
of the despairing lovers, by the magic of whose powerful wand the usual Pantomimic changes are effected in
a trice—Jack becomes Harlequin; Rosebud, Columbine; Gaffer, Pantaloon; the Squire, the Lover; and
the Priest, the Clown. Mirth, revelry, fun, frolic, and joviality are now the order of the day, and the scene
changes to a view of Hyde Park and the Serpentine River on a frosty morning in January: in which is
represented, with admirable effect, a display of patent skating. An oil cloth is spread upon the stage, a group
comprised of various laughable characters are assembled on it, and skate about with as much rapidity, and
precisely as though it were a sheet of ice. The adroit skill of old stagers on the slippery surface, with the
clumsy awkwardness and terror of novices in the art, are well represented. A prodigious fat man makes his
appearance; when a race is called for, he, of course, tries his prowess, when the ice cracking beneath the
heavy weight assembled on it gives way with a heavy crash, and "Fatty" is consigned to a watery bed.
Assistance is immediately tendered, when, by Harlequin's power, a lean and shrivelled spirit of the deep rises
from below to the great alarm of the beholders, and whose limbs continue to expand till his head touches the
clouds. The whole of the scene is one of the most laughable and best managed in the Pantomime. Kew
Gardens, on a May-day morning, is also a very pleasing scene, in which some pretty Morris dancing is
introduced. The Barber's shop, in which shaving by steam is hit off, is excellent in its way, but not so well
understood in its details, as to make it equally effective in representation. Vauxhall Bridge, and the Gardens
which succeeds it, are also charmingly painted by the Grieves, and from hence the Clown and Pantaloon take
69 of the
an "Aeronautic excursion" to Paris. This is a revolving scene—the balloon ascends—and the
English landscape gradually recedes from the view—the gradual approach of night—the rising
of the moon—the passing of the balloon through heavy clouds—and the return of day, are
beautifully represented; the sea covered with ships, is seen in distant perspective with the French coast; a
bird's-eye view of Paris follows, and the balloon safely descends in the gardens of the Tuileries. The adjoining
palace, mansions, and gardens being brilliantly illuminated, give the scene a most splendid and picturesque
effect. A variety of other scenes, but far too numerous to mention individually, deserve the highest applause,
particularly the village of Bow, Leadenhall Market, with a change to an illuminated civic feast in the
Guildhall; Burlington Arcade at night, and the village of Ganderclue by sunrise. The Temple of Iris, formed of
the "radiant panoply of the heavenly arch," by Grieve, is most brilliant.
The advent of Pantomime, early in the eighteenth century, gave a special fillip to spectacular display, as they
were all announced to be set off with "new scenery, decorations, and flyings."
Some of the stage devices of Pantomime are of considerable antiquity; as, for instance, the basket-work
hobby-horses, that figured as far back as the old English Morris dances, to be revived in the French ballet of
the seventeenth century, and, in after years, in English Pantomime.
The Pantomime donkey is at least, we are told, 200 years old. In "Arlequin Mercure Galant," produced in
Paris in 1682, by the Italian Comedians, Harlequin made his entrance on a moke's back—and the
merriment afterwards being greatly enhanced when Master "Neddy," with Pan seated on its back, suddenly
came in two, to the consternation of the beholders. To the Italian Pantomime Comedians we owe many of our
stage devices and tricks. The statue scene in "Frivolity," played by the Messrs. Leopolds, was introduced by
the Italians in "Arlequin Lingere du Palais," when this piece was performed at Paris in 1682. Again, the
device of cutting a hole in a portrait for an eaves-dropper's head to be inserted, was used in "Columbine
Avocat" as far back as 1685.
In "Arlequin Lingere du Palais," played at the Hotel de Bourgogne in October, 1682, there was represented
two stalls—an underclothier's and a confectioner's. Harlequin dressed half like a man and half like a
woman, with a mask on each side of his face to match presides in this dual capacity at both stalls. Pasquariel,
who comes to buy, is utterly bewildered, and is made the target of both jests and missiles of monsieur of the
confectioners, and mademoiselle of the adjoining stall. Possibly the shop scenes in our English Harlequinades
may have originated from this. A similar idea to the above was given in O'Keefe's Pantomime of "Harlequin
Teague; or the Giants' Causeway," performed at the Haymarket in 1782. Charles Bannister appeared in this
Pantomime and sang a duet as a giant with two heads, one side representing a gentleman of quality, and the
other a hunting squire. Mrs. German Reed, about 1855, appeared representing two old women, between whom
an imaginary conversation was held, Mrs. Reed turning first one side of her face to the audience, and then the
other. Fred Maccabe, in his "Essence of Faust," had also a similar allusion, and by many "transformation
dancers" was it used. The antiquity of many other devices could be noted, but I must desist, yet I cannot help
remarking that even here we have more exemplifications of history repeating itself.
Scenical representations and mechanical devices in Italy had long been made a fine art, and an English
traveller and critic observes that our painting compared to theirs is only daubing. I find among their
decorations statues of marble, alabaster, palaces, colonnades, galleries, and sketches of architecture; pieces of
perspective that deceive the judgment as well as the eye; prospects of a prodigious extent in spaces not thirty
feet deep. As for their machines I can't think it in the power of human wit to carry their inventions further. In
1697, I saw at Venice an elephant discovered on the stage, when, in an instant, an army was seen in its place;
the soldiers, having by the disposition of their shields, given so true a representation of it as if it had been a
real elephant.
70 of the
In Rome, at the Theatre Capranio, in 1698, there was a ghost of a woman surrounded by guards. This
phantom, extending her arms and unfolding her clothes, was, with one motion, transformed into a perfect
palace, with its front, its wings, body, and courtyard. The guards, striking their halberds on the stage, were
immediately turned into so many waterworks, cascades, and trees, that formed a charming garden before the
palace. At the same theatre, in the opera "Nerone Infante," the interior of hell was shown. Here part of the
stage opened, and discovered a scene underneath, representing several caves, full of infernal spirits, that flew
about, discharging fire and smoke, on another side the river of Lethe and Charon's boat. Upon this landing a
prodigious monster appeared, whose mouth opening to the great horror of the spectators, covered the front
wings of the remaining part of the stage. Within his jaws was discovered a throne of fire, and a multitude of
monstrous snakes, on which Pluto sat. After this the great monster, expanding his wings, began to move very
slowly towards the audience. Under his body appeared a great multitude of devils, who formed themselves
into a ballet, and plunged, one after the other, into the opening of the floor. The great monster was in an
instant transformed into an innumerable multitude of broad white butterflies, which flew all into the pit, and
so low that some often touched the hats of several of the spectators, and at last they disappeared. During this
circumstance, which sufficiently employed the eyes of the spectators, the stage was refitted, and the scene
changed into a beautiful garden, with which the third act began.
The scene painter, Devoto, painted the scenery and decorations for the Goodman's Fields Theatre, where, it is
interesting to note, David Garrick made his first London appearance in 1741. His first appearance on any stage
had been made at Ipswich on Tuesday, 21st July, in the same year, under the name of Lyddall. Garrick, during
his time, introduced many novelties in the way of scenery and transparencies, acting on the suggestions of
Signor Seivandoni, the scenic artist at the Opera-house, and the fencing master, Dominico Angelo. These
transparencies became the talk of London, and it has been known for several plays to have been written so as
to introduce them. The first transparent scene is said to have been the "Enchanted Wood," introduced in
"Harlequin's Invasion," at Drury Lane, the painter being one French, the scenic artist of the theatre.
Beverley, the scene painter for Madame Vestris, half a century ago, brought fairy, or Pantomime, scenes to
great perfection. Leopold Wagner, speaking of them, says:—"We have it upon the authority of Mr.
Planché that these were almost entirely due to the skilled efforts and successes of Mr. William Beverley, who,
in the nature of Extravaganza, so impressed the public with his fine talents as an artist upon theatrical canvas,
that gorgeous scenes became quite the rage, and how, year after year, Mr. Beverley's powers were taxed to the
utmost to outdo his former triumphs, and how the most costly materials and complicated machinery were
annually put into requisition until the managers began to suffer."
Speaking of the production on the 26th December, 1849, of "The Island of Jewels," Planché says, "The novel,
and yet exceedingly simple, falling of the leaves of a palm tree, which discovered six fairies, supporting a
coronet of jewels, produced such an effect as I scarcely remember having witnessed on any similar occasion
up to that period. The last scene became the first in the estimation of the management. The most complicated
machinery, the most costly materials were annually put into requisition, until their bacon was so buttered that
it was impossible to save it. Nothing was considered brilliant but the last scene. Dutch metal was in the
ascendant. It was no longer even painting, it was upholstery. Mrs. Charles Mathews herself informed me that
she had paid between £60 and £70 for gold tissue for the dresses of the Supernumeraries alone." I wonder
what Mrs. Mathews would say if she could now visit this terrestrial sphere of ours?
All this love of spectacular display soon began to supersede the good old-fashioned Christmas Pantomimes.
In his work, "Behind the Scenes," Mr. Fitzgerald very graphically describes the Transformation scene of later
days, and now becoming nearly as obsolete as the Harlequinade. All will recall in some elaborate
transformation scene how quietly and gradually it is evoked. First the gauzes lift slowly one behind the
other—perhaps the most pleasing of all scenic effects—giving glimpses of the Realms of Bliss
seen beyond in a tantalising fashion. Then is revealed a kind of half glorified country, clouds and banks
71 of the
evidently concealing much. Always a sort of pathetic, and, at the same time, exultant strain rises, and is
repeated as the changes go on; now we hear the faint tinkle—signal to those aloft on the "bridges" to
open more glories. Now some of the banks begin to part slowly, showing realms of light with a few divine
beings—fairies—rising slowly here and there. More breaks beyond, and more fairies rising with
a pyramid of these ladies beginning to mount slowly in the centre. Thus it goes on, the lights streaming on full
in every colour and from every quarter in the richest effulgence. In some of the more daring efforts the
femmes suspendues seem to float in the air or rest on the frail support of sprays or branches of trees. While,
finally, at the back of all the most glorious paradise of all will open, revealing the pure empyrean itself, and
some fair spirit aloft in a cloud among the stars; the apex of all. Then all motion ceases; the work is complete;
the fumes of crimson, red, and blue fire begin to rise at the wings; the music bursts into a crash of exultation;
and, possibly to the general disenchantment, a burly man, in a black frock coat, steps out from the side and
bows awkwardly. Then, to a shrill whistle, the first scene of the Harlequinade closes in, and shuts out the
brilliant vision.
CHAPTER XVIII.
Pantomimic Families—Giuseppe Grimaldi—James Byrne,

the Harlequin and Inventor of the modern Harlequin's
dress—Joseph Grimaldi, Junior—The Bologna
Family—Tom Ellar—The Ridgways—The
Bradburys—The Montgomerys—-The
Paynes—The Marshalls—Charles and Richard
Stilt—Richard Flexmore—Tom Gray—The
Paulos—Dubois—Arthur and Charles
Leclerq—"Jimmy" Barnes—Famous
Pantaloons—Miss Farren—Mrs.
Siddons—Columbines—Notable Actors in Pantomime.
In the histrionic profession the genius of hereditary is shown over and over again; and no more so than in
Pantomimic families. For, if blessed with a numerous progeny, the sons became—the eldest, of course,
could only, as the place of honour, be Clown—the others, Harlequins, Pantaloons; the daughters,
Columbines; and, perhaps, Harlequinas.
In the last chapter but one I have referred to Grimaldi's father, Giuseppe Grimaldi, "Iron Legs," and now let us
recall something more of the sire of so worthy a son.
As a dancer—as his father was before him—and Pantomimist, Giuseppe Grimaldi, before
coming to England, had appeared at the fairs of France and Italy. In 1758 Giuseppe made his first appearance
on the stage of Drury Lane, under Garrick's management, in a new Pantomime dance, entitled, "The Millers."
CHAPTER XVIII. 72
For some thirty years afterwards the Signor continued to be a member of the Drury Lane corps de ballet, and
appearing as Clown, Harlequin, and Pantaloon.
In 1764, Giuseppe played Harlequin in a Clown-less Pantomime at Sadler's Wells, and in the Drury Lane
Pantomime of the same year, though there were Harlequin, Pantaloon, and Columbine in it, there was no
Clown. Drury Lane was then only open in the winter, and Sadler's Wells in the summer months.
A notable Harlequin was Mr. James Byrne, the ballet-master. "Mr. Byrne," says Grimaldi, in his "Memoirs,"
"was the best Harlequin on the boards, and never has been excelled, or even equalled, since that period."
Mr. Byrne came of a well-known dancing family, and to him we owe the introduction of the tight-fitting dress
worn by Harlequin. Until the production of the Pantomime of "Harlequin Amulet, or the Magic of Mona," at
Drury Lane Theatre, written by Mr. Powell, produced at Christmas, 1799, by Mr. Byrne, and which ran until
Easter, 1800—it had been the loose jacket and trousers of the ancient Mimes. It had also been
considered indispensable that Harlequin should be continually attitudinising in the five different positions of
Admiration, Flirtation, Thought, Defiance, and Determination; and continually passing from one to the other
without pausing. Byrne, for newer attitudes, abolished these postures, but long afterwards the old form of
posing was, and is still, retained by the exponents of Harlequin.
In this Pantomime, Byrne, as Harlequin, appeared in a white silk close-fitting shape, fitting without a wrinkle,
and into which the variegated colours of time-honoured memory were woven, and covered with spangles,
presenting a very bright appearance.
Mr. Byrne, also gave the character of Harlequin an entirely new reading. The colours of Harlequin's dress had
every one a significance, as follows:—Red, temper; blue, love; yellow, jealousy; brown or mauve,
constancy. When Harlequin wore his mask down he was supposed to be invisible. On his mask he had two
bumps, denoting knowledge on the one hand, and thought on the other, whilst in his cap he wore a hare's foot,
and a worked device on his shoes, indicating flight and speed. Can we not from the bumps of knowledge and
the hare's foot trace the characteristics of the god Mercury, which, as previously stated, was the prototype of
Harlequin. With the bat, or magic sword, the gift from the fairies to him, Harlequin was supposed to be
invulnerable, and if he lost his sword he would fall into the power of the Clown.
Byrne's innovation was not resisted, and it was well received, and ever since this memorable occasion, the
character of Harlequin has, for the most part, been dressed as Byrne dressed it. The significance of the
present-day variegated colours of Harlequin's costume are somewhat different to the above, and denote: red,
fire; blue, water; yellow, air; and black, earth. These—the four elements—are typical of the
regions governed by Mercury.
Mr. Byrne was at Drury Lane in the time of Garrick. He died December 4th, 1845, in the eighty-ninth year of
his age. Mrs. Byrne, who was also a dancer, pre-deceasing her husband by a few months in her seventy-fourth
year.
Joseph Grimaldi, son of "Old Joe," made, at twelve years of age, his first appearance at Sadler's Wells in
1814, playing Man Friday to his father's Robinson Crusoe. For several years both father and son played
together in various Pantomimes; and it was thought that before young Joe there was a brilliant future. This,
however, was soon dissipated, as he embarked upon vicious courses, and through a blow on the head received
in some brawl "He became a wild and furious savage; he was frequently attacked with dreadful fits of
epilepsy, and continually committed actions which nothing but insanity could prompt. In 1828 he had a
decided attack of insanity, and was confined in a strait waistcoat in his father's house for some time."
Pantomimic Families—Giuseppe Grimaldi—James Byrne,the Harlequin and Inventor of the modern

73 Harl
From engagements at Drury Lane, Sadler's Wells, the Pavilion and the Surrey Theatre in turn, he was
dismissed, finally "Falling into the lowest state of wretchedness and poverty. His dress had fallen to rags, his
feet were thrust into two worn-out slippers, his face was pale with disease, and squalid with dirt and want, and
he was steeped in degradation." This unhappy life came to a final close in a public-house in Pitt Street, off the
Tottenham Court Road.
Signor Pietro Bologna, a country-man and friend of Giuseppe Grimaldi, Joe Grimaldi's father, brought with
him from Genoa his wife, two sons and a daughter. They were all Mimes, and, in a Pantomime produced in
1795, entitled, "The Magic Feast," Signor Bologna was Clown, and his son, "Jack" Bologna, was Harlequin;
the latter being also Harlequin to Grimaldi's Clown, both at Covent Garden and Sadler's Wells. "Jack"
Bologna married a sister of Mary Bristow, Joe Grimaldi's second wife, and the mother of poor young Joe.
Tom Ellar was another famous Harlequin, first making his appearance at the Royalty, Goodman's Fields, in
1808. For several seasons he played Harlequin at Covent Garden.
Many years ago penny portraits of Mr. Ellar "In his favourite character of Harlequin," were published by a
Mr. Skelt, or a Mr. Park, of Long Lane, Smithfield, and were the delight of those, who, if living now, are old
and gray.
Tom Ellar died April 8, 1842, aged 62. Previous to his death he must have fallen upon evil days, as
Thackeray, in 1840, wrote: "Tom, who comes bounding home from school, has the doctor's account in his
trunk, and his father goes to sleep at the Pantomime to which he takes him. Pater infelix, you too, have
laughed at Clown, and the magic wand of spangled Harlequin: what delightful enchantment did it wave round
you in the golden days 'when George the Third was King?' But our Clown lies in his grave; and our Harlequin
Ellar, prince of many of our enchanted islands, was he not at Bow Street the other day, in his dirty, faded,
tattered motley—seized as a law breaker for acting at a penny theatre, after having well nigh starved in
the streets, where nobody would listen to his old guitar? No one gave a shilling to bless him: not one of us
who owe him so much!"
Another Pantomime family were the Ridgways. Tom Ridgway was Clown under Madame Vestris's
management at Covent Garden.
There have been several Bradburys since the time of Grimaldi's great rival, Robert Bradbury, died July 21,
1831, who wore on his person nine strong "pads," in order to go through some extraordinary feats.
The Montgomerys; the Paynes, Harry and Fred; nor should the name of "Old Billy" Payne be omitted. "Billy"
Payne it was, it will be remembered, who, in 1833, helped, from the stage of Covent Garden, the dying
Edmund Kean.
Then there were the Marshalls, Harry and Joseph; Charles and Richard Stilt; and a very original and amusing
Clown, Richard Flexmore, died August 20, 1860, aged 36. Tom Gray, a famous Clown of Covent Garden,
died January 28th, 1768, aged upwards of 100 years; the Paulo family of Pantomimists; Dubois, Arthur and
Charles Leclerq, Walter Hilyard, and many, many others.
In the 'twenties and 'thirties a popular and famous Pantaloon was "Jimmy" Barnes, died September 28th, 1838.
Barnes, in the summer of 1830, was engaged to play in an English company at Paris, but they had hardly
commenced to perform when the Revolution of July broke out. Some years afterwards Barnes published in
"Bentley's Miscellany," from his old original M.S., an amusing and illustrated account of his wanderings.
Amongst other Pantaloons there have been—Thomas Blanchard, died August 20, 1859, aged 72;
William Lynch, died June 29, 1861, aged 78; R. Norman, died September 16, 1858, aged 70; George Tanner,
Pantomimic Families—Giuseppe Grimaldi—James Byrne,the Harlequin and Inventor of the modern

74 Harl
died February 8, 1870; and Paulo, a member of Mr. Charles Kean's Company at the Princess's Theatre, had as
Pantaloon appeared in many Pantomimes. It is a notable fact that a good number of our Mimes were
long-livers.
Long before Miss Farren, afterwards Countess of Derby (died April 21, 1829), first charmed a London
audience, we hear of her in 1772 at Wakefield in one of her first parts—if not her first—that of
Columbine. She could both sing well and dance gracefully. One of the earliest "parts" that even the great Mrs.
Siddons (that afterwards was), when a young girl, played, was in connection with Pantomime, as Combes
remembered to have seen her "Standing by the side of her father's stage, and knocking a pair of snuffers
against a candle-stick to imitate the sound of a wind-mill, during the representation of some Harlequinade."
In days gone by Madame Leclerq, Carlotta Leclerq, Charles Kean's Columbine in the seasons of 1850-1-2, E.
Dennett, Emma Boleno, died October 18th, 1867, aged 35; Marie Charles, who died from an accident by fire,
Pavilion Theatre, January 21, 1864, and others have won considerable fame in the part of Columbine.
Amongst those who have played Harlequin in days gone by, have been the elder Kean, and the well-known
actor, Mr. Wilson Barrett, who, early in his career, played this part for an extra two shillings and sixpence
"thrown in," to augment his then weekly salary of seventeen shillings and sixpence; whilst Sir Henry Irving
tells us that he also has appeared in Pantomime, in the character of a wicked fairy, named Venoma, in days
since past, for a small monetary emolument.
CHAPTER XIX.
Popular Pantomime subjects—Poor Pantomime

Librettos—Pantomime subjects of our progenitors—The
various versions of "Aladdin"—"The Babes in the
Wood"—"Blue Beard"—"Beauty and the
Beast"—"Cinderella"—"Dick Whittington"—"The
House that Jack Built"—"Jack the Giant Killer"—"Jack
and the Beanstalk"—"Red Riding Hood"—"The Sleeping
Beauty in the Wood"—Unlucky subjects—"Ali Baba and
the Forty Thieves"—"The Fair One with Golden
Locks"—The source of "Sindbad the Sailor" and "Robinson
Crusoe."
It may be of interest in this History of Pantomime to note the origin of some of our most popular present day
Pantomime subjects, besides showing many of our present day Pantomime libretto writers that in such
well-known themes as "Aladdin," "Cinderella," and others, there is no need to cast their stories pretty much in
the same groove, year after year, when by drawing on the fairy-lore of the East much that is new and original,
for present-day English Pantomimes, is waiting the attention of their skill and ingenuity.
CHAPTER XIX. 75
Though the stories of popular English Pantomimes are practically the same each year (why I do not know),
yet, not content with this, in many of our large cities and towns we frequently see the same Pantomime title
not only "billed" at one theatre, but perhaps at several others. This clashing and clashing year after year with
one another's titles (I say nothing about the "plots," as these, in many instances, only consist of a half-penny
worth of author to an intolerable deal of music-hall gag), cannot but, I have long been of opinion, adversely
affect the box-office receipts, unless, of course, the Pantomime-goer makes a point of "doing the round," so to
speak, which, however, is not generally the case.
As Pantomime writers in the early days there were Thomas Dibdin, son of Charles Dibdin, the writer of
nautical ballads, Pocock and Sheridan. Dibdin was one of the best of Pantomime librettists, and from the years
1771 to 1841 his prolific pen, as a writer of Pantomimes, was never idle, as from it came some thirty-three
Pantomimes, and all successes. Amongst other literary luminaries, in after years, as writers of Pantomime
Extravaganzas, there were J.R. Planché, E.L. Blanchard, W. Brough, Mark Lemon, H.J. Byron, Wilton Jones,
and John Francis McArdle.
History always repeats itself we know, and poor Pantomime books were not unknown as far back as half a
century ago, as the subjoined parody on the "Burial of Sir John Moore," by the late Albert Smith plainly
shows:—
Not a laugh was heard, not a topical joke,

As its corse to oblivion we hurried;
Not a paper a word in its favour spoke
On the Pantomime going to be buried.
We buried it after the Boxing Night,

The folks from the galleries turning;
For 'twas plain it would scarcely pay for the light
Of the star in the last act burning.
No useless play-bill put forth a puff,

How splendid the public had found it,
But it lay like a piece that had been called "stuff,"
With a very wet blanket around it.
After this digression for one brief moment more, let us take a passing glance at some of the Pantomime
subjects which our progenitors delighted in. They had not the continual ringing of the changes on half-a-dozen
Pantomime subjects, as we have at present, but revelled in such attractions as "Harlequin Don Quixote," "The
Triumph of Mirth, or Harlequin's Wedding," "The Enchanted Wood or Harlequin's Vagaries," "Hurly Burly,
or the Fairy of the Wells," "Blue Beard, Black Beard, and Grey Beard," and many others. However, to return.
Of the Pantomime subjects, whose origin we are going to enquire into, let us first commence with "Aladdin."
According to the many versions of this popular story in Europe and Asia, it would seem that its origin
originally was of Buddhist extraction. In our common English version of "Aladdin," in "The Arabian Nights,"
which was taken from Galland's French version, it is doubtless an Eastern picture. It does not occur, however,
in any known Arabian text (says Mr. Clouston, in "Popular Tales," and to whose work I am indebted for much
of the information for this chapter) of "The Thousand and One Nights" (Elf Laila wa Laila), although the
chief incidents are found in many Asiatic fictions, and it had become orally current in Greece and Italy before
it was published by Galland. A popular Italian version, which presents a close analogy to the familiar story of
"Aladdin" (properly "Alá-u-d-Din," signifying "Exaltation of the Faith") is given by Miss M.H. Busk, in her
"Folklore of Rome," under the title of "How Cajusse was married."
Popular Pantomime subjects—Poor PantomimeLibrettos—Pantomime subjects of our progenitors&mdash

76
A good natured looking old man one day knocks at the door of a poor tailor out of work; his son, opening the
door, is told by the old man that he is his uncle, and he gives him half a piastre to buy a good dinner. When
the tailor comes home—he was absent at the time—he is surprised to hear the old man claim him
as a brother, but finding him so rich he does not dispute the matter. After the old man had lived some time
with the tailor and his family, literally defraying all the household expenses, he finds it necessary to depart,
and with the tailor's consent takes the boy Cajusse with him, in order that he may learn some useful business.
But no sooner do they get outside the town than he tells Cajusse that it is all a dodge. "I'm not your uncle," he
says, "I want a strong, daring boy to do something I am too old to do. I'm a wizard—don't attempt to
escape for you can't." Cajusse, not a bit frightened, asks him what it is he wants him to do; and the wizard
raises a flat stone from the ground, and orders him to go down, and after he gets to the bottom of the cave to
proceed until he comes to a beautiful garden, where he will see a fierce dog keeping watch. "Here's bread for
him. Don't look back when you hear sounds behind you. On a shelf you will see an old lantern; take it down,
and bring it to me." So saying the wizard gave Cajusse a ring, in case anything awkward should happen to him
after he had got the lantern, when he had only to rub the ring, and wish for deliverance. Cajusse finds precious
stones hanging like frost from the trees in the garden underground, and he fills his pocket with them.
Returning to the entrance of the cave, he refuses to give up the lantern till he has been drawn out; so the
wizard thinking merely to frighten him replaces the stone. Cajusse finding himself thus entrapped rubs the
ring, when instantly the Slave of the Ring appears, and the youth at once orders the table to be laid for dinner.
He then calls for his mother and father, and they all have an unusually good meal. Some time afterwards,
Cajusse had returned home, the town was illuminated, one day in honour of the marriage of the Sultan's
daughter to the Vizier's son. He sends his mother to the palace with a basket of jewels, and, to demand the
Sultan's daughter in marriage. The Sultan is astounded at the purity of the gems, and says he will give his
answer in a month. At the end of the same week the Grand Vizier's son is married to the Princess. Cajusse
rubs his lantern and says "Go to-night and take the daughter of the Sultan and lay her on a poor pallet in our
outhouse." This is done, and Cajusse begins to talk to her, but she is far too frightened to answer. The Sultan
learns of his daughter's whereabouts, and does not know what to make of the strange business. The son of the
Vizier complains to his father that his wife disappears every night, and comes back just before dawn. Cajusse
now sends his mother to the Sultan with three more baskets full of jewels, and the Sultan tells her he may
come and see him at the palace. Having received this message, Cajusse rubs the lantern, gets a dress of gold
and silver, a richly caparisoned horse, four pages with rich dresses to ride behind them, and one to go before,
distributing money to the people. Cajusse is next married to the Princess, and they live together in a most
magnificent palace with great happiness. By-and-bye the old wizard hears of this, and resolves to obtain the
lantern by hook or by crook. Disguising himself as a pedlar he comes to the palace calling out the familiar
"New lamps for old." By this means he obtains the precious lamp, and immediately transports the palace and
the princess to an island in the high seas. Cajusse, by the aid of the magic ring, quickly follows, to find his
princess a prisoner in the power of the wizard. He then gives her this advice: "Make a feast to-night; say you'll
marry the old wizard if he'll tell you what thing would be fatal to him, and you will guard him against it." The
princess gets from the magician the fatal secret. "One must go into a far distant forest," he says "Where there
is a beast called the hydra, and cut off his seven heads. If the middle head is split open a leveret will jump out
and run off. If the leveret is split open, a bird will fly out. If the bird is caught and opened, in its body is a
precious stone, and should that be placed under my pillow I shall die." Cajusse accomplishes all these things,
and gives the life-stone to the princess, together with a bottle of opium. The princess drugs the wizard's wine,
and when he had laid his head on his pillow (under which was the stone) he gave three terrible yells, turned
himself round three times, and was dead. After thus ridding themselves of their enemy, Cajusse and his bride
lived happy ever afterwards.
Aladdin's adventure with the magician in the enchanted cave has also its counterpart in Germany (see
Grimms' German Collection).
Another "Aladdin" version is the tale of Marúf, the last in the Búlák and Calcutta printed Arabic texts of the
"Book of Marúf" in "The Thousand and One Nights." The story is to the effect that Marúf had given out that

77
he was a rich man, under which false pretence he marries the Sultan's daughter. The tale he spread about was
that he was expecting the arrival of a rich caravan, which contained all his princely wealth. After they were
married, Marúf confesses to his wife the imposture he has practised on them. She urges him to fly, or his head
would be forfeited, and procures him a disguise to flee the country. He does so, and, whilst journeying
through a village, he sees a man ploughing in a field, whom he asks for food. Whilst the latter is away, Marúf
continues the ploughing, where the man had left off, and the ploughshare strikes against something hard in the
ground, which turns out to be an iron ring in a marble slab. He pulls at the ring, and Marúf discovers a small
room covered with gold, emeralds, rubies, and other precious stones. He also discovers a coffer of crystal,
having a little box, containing a diamond in its entirety. Desirous of knowing what the box further contains, he
finds a plain gold ring, with strange talismanic characters engraved thereon. Placing the ring on his finger, he
is suddenly confronted by the Genii of the Ring, who demands to know what are his commands. Marúf desires
the Genii to transport all the treasure to the earth, when mules and servants appear, and carry it to the city
which Marúf had left, much to the chagrin of the Vizier, who did not like Marúf. Marúf, during a great feast
prepared for the occasion, tells the Sultan how he became possessed of the treasure, when the Sultan begs the
loan of the ring, which Marúf hands to the Vizier to give him, and which no sooner does he get, than he
commands the Genii to convey Marúf to some desert island, and leave him to die. The Vizier also serves the
Sultan the same way, and then he turns his attention to "Mrs. Marúf," whom he threatens with death if she
refuses to marry him. At a banquet she makes the Vizier drunk, obtains possession of the ring, secures the
return of Marúf and the Sultan, and the decapitation of the Vizier.
The "Babes in the Wood" was registered on the books of Stationers' Hall as a ballad as far back as 1595.
To take another familiar Pantomime subject, "Blue Beard," this story is said to have been invented as a satire
on our King Henry VIII. There is little doubt, however, of it originating from a very ancient source; and to
afford the reader all the possible information on the subject, a writer in "The Drama," a magazine of the
beginning of the last century has the following, though he does not state his authority for the
information:—
As this extraordinary personage has long been the theme, not only of children's early study and terror, it will
be gratifying to peruse the character of that being who really existed, and who was distinguished in horror and
derision by the strange appellation of "Blue Beard."
He was the famous Gilles, Marquis de Laval, a Mareschal of France, and a General of uncommon intrepidity,
who greatly distinguished himself in the reigns of Charles VI. and VII., by his courage, particularly against
the English, when they invaded France. He rendered such services to his country, which were sufficient to
immortalize his name, had he not for ever tarnished his glory by the most terrible and cruel murders,
blasphemies, and licentiousness of every kind. His revenues were princely; but his prodigality was sufficient
to render even an Emperor a bankrupt. Wherever he went he had in his suite a seraglio, a band of players, a
company of musicians, a society of sorcerers and magicians, an almost incredible number of cooks, packs of
dogs of various kinds, and above 200 led horses. Mezerai, an author of great repute, says, that he encouraged
and maintained men who called themselves sorcerers, to discover hidden treasures, and corrupted young
persons of both sexes to attach themselves to him, and afterwards killed them for the sake of their blood,
which was requisite to form his charms and incantations. These horrid excesses may be believed, when we
reflect on the age of ignorance and barbarism in which they were certainly too often practised. He was at
length, for a state crime against the Duke of Brittany, sentenced to be burnt alive in a field at Nantz in 1440,
but the Duke, who was present at his execution, so far mitigated the sentence, that he was first strangled, then
burnt, and his ashes buried. Though he was descended from one of the most illustrious families in France, he
declared, previous to his death, that all his terrible excesses were owing to his wretched education.
"Blue Beard" was first dramatised at Paris, in 1746, when "Barbe Bleu" was thus
announced:—Pantomime—representée par la troupe des Comediens Pantomimes, Foir St.

78
Laurent. It was afterwards dramatised at the Earl of Barrymore's Theatre, Wargrave, Berks., and in 1791.
After that the subject was produced at Covent Garden Theatre as a Pantomime.
"Beauty and the Beast," the latter a white bear, is to be found in "Popular Tales from the Norse," by Mr.
Dasent, and in the collection of "Popular Tales from the German" by the Brothers Grimm. As a ballad the
story of "Beauty and the Beast" is a very old one.
"Cinderella" is to be found in the language of every European country. In ancient Hindu legends it appears; in
tales related by the Greek poets it is also to be found.
The story of "Cinderella," according to the ancient Hindu legends, is that of the Sun and the Dawn. Cinderella
has been likened to Aurora, the Spirit of the Dawn, and the fairy Prince of the legend is the morning Sun, ever
closely pursuing her to make her his bride. The Hindu legend of the lost slipper is that a wealthy Rajah's
beautiful daughter was born with a golden necklace, which contained her soul, and, if the necklace was taken
off and worn by someone else, the Princess would die. The Rajah gave her on her birthday a pair of slippers
with ornaments of gold and gems upon them. The princess went out upon a mountain to gather flowers, and
whilst stooping there to pluck the flowers, one of her slippers fell into the forest below. A Prince, who was
hunting, picked up the slipper, and was so charmed with it that he said he would make the wearer his wife. He
made his wish known, but no one came to claim the slipper; at length word was given to the Prince where to
find the Rajah's daughter; and shortly afterwards they were married. One of the wives of the Prince, being
jealous of the Rajah's daughter, stole the necklace, put it on her own neck, and then the Rajah's daughter died.
The Prince, afterwards, found out the secret of the necklace, and got it back again, and put it on his dead
wife's neck, and she came to life, and they lived ever afterwards in the greatest harmony.
The ancient Grecian version of "Cinderella" is that of the story of a beautiful woman named Rhodope, who,
whilst bathing, an eagle flew away with one of her slippers to Egypt, and dropped it in the lap of the King as
he sat at Memphis on the judgment seat. The King was so attracted by the smallness and beauty of the slipper
that he fell in love with the wearer, and afterwards made her his wife.
In Tuscany, Persia, Norway, Denmark, Russia, the story of "Dick Whittington" is well known. In all
probability, like many other fairy tales, its origin was from a Buddhist source. The English version, that the
Lord Mayor Whittington was the poor ill-used boy he is represented to have been in the popular tale seems
quite impossible, since according to Stow (mentions Mr. Clouston) he was the son of Sir Richard Whittington,
Knight. The story was current in Europe in the thirteenth century. In the chronicle of Albert, Abbot of the
Convent of St. Mary of Slade, written at that period, it is related that there were two citizens of Venice, one of
whom was rich, the other poor. It fortuned that the rich man went abroad to trade, and the poor man gave him
as his venture two cats, the sale of which, as in our tale of the renowned "Dick Whittington," procured him
great wealth.
On September 21st, 1668, Pepys makes mention in his diary of going to Southwark Fair, and of seeing the
puppet show of "Whittington," which he says "was pretty to see." A Pantomime on the subject was also given
by Rich early in the eighteenth century.
In Tuscany, the "Dick Whittington" story runs that in the fifteenth century, a Genoese merchant, who
presented two cats to the King, was rewarded by him with rich presents.
In Norway, a poor boy, having found a box full of silver money under a stone, emptied the box and its
contents into a lake—one piece, however, floated, which he kept, believing it to be good. His mother,
hearing of this, thrust him out of doors; and he eventually obtained employment in a merchant's house. The
merchant, having to make a voyage to foreign parts, he asked each of his servants what he should "venture"
for him. The poor boy offered all he had, the silver penny, of which he was still the possessor. With this the

79
merchant purchased a cat, and sailed away, but the vessel in which he was in was driven out of her course on
to the shores of a strange country. The merchant going ashore went to an inn, and, in a room, he saw the table
laid for dinner, with a long rod for each man who sat at it. When the meat was set on the table, out swarmed
thousands of mice, and each one who sat at the table beat them off with his rod. The cat was brought into
service, and sold for a hundred dollars, and soon put an end to the career of the mice. When the merchant had
weighed anchor, much to his surprise, he saw the cat sitting at the mast head. Again foul weather came on,
and again the vessel was driven to another strange country, where the mice were just as numerous as before.
The cat was called in, sold this time for two hundred dollars, and away the merchant sailed. No sooner,
however, was he at sea, than the cat once more appeared before him. The vessel was again driven out of her
course to another strange country, over-run with rats this time, when poor pussy was sold a third time, for the
sum of three hundred dollars. Again the cat made its appearance; and the merchant thinking to do the poor boy
out of his money, a dreadful storm arose, which only subsided on the merchant making a vow that the boy
should have every penny. When he arrived home the merchant faithfully kept his promise, gave the boy the
six hundred dollars, and the hand of his daughter besides.
A Breton legend of the story of "Dick Whittington" runs that three sons go to seek their fortune, the eldest of
whom, Yvon, possesses a cat. The cat again plays an important part. Yvon becomes the friend of the Lord of
the Manor, and has gold and diamonds bestowed upon him in galore.
The Russian version is that a poor little orphan boy buys a cat, which some mischievous boys were teasing,
for three copecks (about a penny). Taken into the service of a merchant the latter goes to a distant country,
accompanied by the cat of the orphan boy. Puss making sad work of some rats, which threatened to make an
end of the merchant in the inn, which he occupied. He ultimately sold the cat to the landlord for a sack full of
gold. Returning home, on his way thither, he thought how foolish it would be to give all the money to the boy.
Whereupon a dreadful storm arose, and the vessel, in which was the merchant, was in danger of sinking. The
merchant, knowing that the storm had arisen through his change of purpose, prayed to heaven for forgiveness,
when the sea became calm, and the vessel arrived safely in port, when the merchant paid over to the orphan
boy all the wealth obtained by the sale of the cat.
In the Persian version, unlike the other legends, the cat is owned by a poor widow, who had been
impoverished through her sons, and was left with only a cat. The sale of the cat produces great wealth; and the
widow, Kayser, immediately sends for her sons to share her newly-acquired fortune. What follows is different
to the other versions of these wonderful cat stories. The sons only too eager to share the wealth of their
mother, fit out many vessels, and begin to trade largely with India and Arabia. Thinking that to acquire wealth
by commerce alone, rather slow work, they turned pirates, and were a source of trouble and annoyance to the
neighbouring states, till about 1230 A.D., when they were reduced to vassalage under Persian rule.
"The House that Jack Built" has its prototype in a sacred hymn in the Talmud of the Hebrews.
"Jack, the Giant Killer" and "Jack and the Beanstalk" are two very ancient themes coming from the North, of
the time, it is said, of King Arthur, and of the days when "Giants were upon the earth." The well-known cry of
the giants in these legends—
"Fe, Fi, Fo, Fum,

I smell the blood of an Englishman;
Be he alive or be he dead,
I'll grind his bones to make my bread,"
is also referred to by Shakespeare in "King Lear," in Act III., Scene 5, when Edgar sings:—
"Child Rowland to the dark Tower came;

80
His word was still, fee, foh, and fum,
I smell the blood of an Englishman."
The English version of the story of "Jack the Giant Killer," must, therefore, be older than the time of
Elizabeth. It is also a strange and significant fact that amongst the Zulus, and the inhabitants of the Fiji
Islands, there are similar legends of the story of "Jack and the Beanstalk."
The story of "Jack and the Beanstalk" is also to be found in old Hindoo tales, in which the beans denote
abundance. The Russians have a story in which a bean falls to the ground, and an old man, the Sun, climbs up
by it to heaven. "The ogre in the land above the skies," observes Mr. Baring Gould, "who was once the
all-father, possessed three treasures—a harp, which played of itself enchanting music; bags of gold and
diamonds; and a hen which daily laid a golden egg. The harp is the wind, the bags of gold are the clouds
dropping the sparkling rain, and the golden egg laid every day by the red hen is the producing sun." The same
idea in "Jack and the Beanstalk" occurs in the fairy legends of the North and the East, as well as in Grecian
stories.
In "Jack the Giant Killer," the gifts given to Jack are found in Tartar, Hindoo, Scandinavian, and German
legends.
Now let us note briefly the origin of "Red Riding Hood" and "The Sleeping Beauty in the Wood." All the
other fairy stories that we know of are to be found in other countries, and springing originally from Asia,
where they were made ages and ages ago.
The Wolf in the story of "Red Riding Hood" has been likened to the days of our own "Bluff King Hal," owing
to the latter's suppression of the monasteries, and Red Riding Hood herself, whom the Wolf subsequently eats,
with her hood and habit, was supposed to be typical of the monastic orders.
The Hindoo's version of the "Red Riding Hood" story is a pretty and fanciful one. Their idea was that there
was always a great Dragon endeavouring to devour Indra, the Sun god, and to prevent the Sun from shining
upon the earth, Indra ultimately overcomes the Dragon. Red Riding Hood, with her warm habit, is supposed to
be the setting sun casting its red and glittering rays as it sinks to rest. The old Grandmother is Mother Earth;
and the Wolf, the Dragon; and when all is dark and still, the Wolf swallows the Grandmother, namely, the
Earth; and afterwards, as Night has fallen, the Evening Sun. The Huntsman denotes the Morning Sun, and he
chases away all the dark clouds gathered during the night, and by doing so kills the Wolf; recovers the old
Grandmother Earth, and brings to life again, Little Red Riding Hood. Another version (observes Mr. T.
Bunce) is that the Wolf is the dark, and dreary winter, that kills the Earth with frost, but when spring comes
again it brings the Earth and the Sun back to life.
In "The Sleeping Beauty in the Wood," the maiden has been likened to the Morning dawn, and the young
Prince, who awakens her, with a kiss, to the Sun.
"Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves," in concluding this chapter, I may say, with "The Fair One with Golden
Locks," forms to the superstitious the only two unlucky Pantomime subjects.
"Sindbad, the Sailor," taken from the "Arabian Nights," has its origin in Persian and Arabian tales.
Of all our Pantomime subjects, "Robinson Crusoe," seems to be the only one we can properly lay claim to as
being "of our own make," so to speak, and written by Daniel De Foe, and, in the main, from the imagination.
De Foe, it has been stated, derived his idea for this story from the adventures of one, Alexander Selkirk, a
Scotchman, who had been a castaway on the Island of Juan Fernandez. The first portion of "Robinson Crusoe"
appeared in "The Family Instructor," in 1719, of which De Foe was the founder. It, at once, sprang into

81
popularity, and has left its author undying fame. De Foe was born about 1660 in the parish of St. Giles,
Cripplegate, died 26th April, 1731, and was buried in Bunhill Fields.
CHAPTER XX.
Pantomime in America.
Pantomime, in America, had not a very long run, it being killed by the farcical comedy. Mr. E.L. Blanchard
supposes that "Mother Goose" was the first Pantomime played in America, but this is an error, as it was not
until 1786, when Garrick's "Harlequin's Invasion," and R. Pocock's "Robinson Crusoe" were played at the
John Street Theatre, New York, that Pantomime made its advent in America. "Mother Goose" was afterwards
played, but it did not suit the Yankee's taste. Rich's Harlequin, Gay of "The Beggars Opera," produced at
Lincoln's Inn Fields Theatre, and which it is said made "Rich Gay, and Gay Rich," also went to America, and
where, it is said, he became the Chief of an Indian tribe in the Far West. In the South Sea Bubble Gay held
some £20,000. His friends advised him to sell, but he dreamed of greatness and splendour, and refused their
counsel. Ultimately, both the profit and the principal was lost, and Gay sunk under the calamity so low that
his life became in danger.
American Pantomimes consisted of a semi-pastoral "opening," performed almost entirely in dumb show, and a
big trick Harlequinade, and down to the time of Pantomime's decease in America was it played like this.
George L. Fox made Pantomime highly popular in America. Born in May of 1825, he, as an actor and
comedian in Yankee and Irish parts, held his own in popularity with the great Joseph Jefferson.
Fox might be properly termed "The Grimaldi of America," as he was the representative Clown of the land of
the stars and stripes. His Clown's parts he dressed like Grimaldi, and with the whitened face and bald head of
Pierrot, the French type of Clown.
The year that "Mother Goose" came to New York saw the introduction of a French troupe of Pantomimists,
known as the Ravels. In imitation of these performers Fox introduced in the 'fifties ballet Pantomimes, and
several Ravelsque pieces like "The Red Gnome" and "The Schoolmaster" with good results.
In 1862 Fox was at the Bowery Theatre, and, during his occupation of the same, he did much to popularise
Pantomime. Half a dozen years afterwards we find him at the Olympic Theatre, New York, where he
produced "Humpty Dumpty," which ran 483 nights, and for five years, till 1873, it held its place, on and off,
in the bill. Altogether it was played 943 times. Fox, from this, was known as Humpty Dumpty, and, strangely
enough, also, the Americans for long enough afterwards called every Pantomime "Humpty Dumpty."
Fox was a very good mimic, imitating all the Hamlets of the day, besides being a good melodramatic actor.
He died October 24th, 1877, at Cambridge, Mass., of softening of the brain.
Tony Denier, a pupil of the Ravels, and a quondam friend of Fox, next took Fox's place in the estimation of
the American public. Of Denier, we are told that he arrived in Boston in 1852, with the proverbial half-crown
in his pocket. He was of French extraction, and descended from one of the best French families. In 1863 he
CHAPTER XX. 82
was with P.T. Barnum, and appearing as a one-legged dancer. In 1868, he went into Pantomime, toured
"Humpty Dumpty," and for some twenty years afterwards kept the Pantomimic ball merrily rolling until his
retirement at Chicago into private life. Denier made Harlequinade tricks a speciality.
Pantomime in America may be said to have lived about a quarter of a century; but in the autumn of this year
(1901) Pantomime, as we now know it in this country, made its first appearance at the Broadway Theatre,
New York, when last year's Drury Lane annual, "The Sleeping Beauty and the Beast," was successfully
presented. It is very probable that this class of entertainment will become very popular in America.
CHAPTER XXI.
Pantomimes made more attractive—The Restrictive Policy of the

Patent Houses—"Mother Goose" and "George Barnwell" at
Covent Garden—Lively Audiences—"Jane
Shore"—"Harlequin Pat and Harlequin Bat"—"The first
speaking opening"—Extravagence in
Extravaganzas—The doom of the old form of
Pantomime—Its revival in a new form—A piece of pure
Pantomime—Present day Mimetic Art—"L'Enfant
Prodigue"—A retrospect—The old with the new, and
conclusion.
Pantomimes, as they grew, were made more and more attractive, "new scenery, decorations, and flyings" were
introduced, and with new "flyings," of course, more accidents.
The restrictive policy adopted by the Patent theatres—till the repeal of their patents
(1843)—towards the minor houses, which gave to the former the sole and only right of performing the
"legitimate" was, by the minor theatres, infringed in many ways. The means adopted was the employment of
Pantomime in the depiction of plays adapted and considered suitable for the minor theatres. These were
entirely carried on by action, and when the actor could not express something that had to be explained, like
the names of characters, a scroll, with the necessary details inscribed thereon, was unrolled in full view of the
audience. These entertainments were very popular at the close of the eighteenth century, and they were also
the means of providing some first-class Pantomimists—as, for instance, Bologna and D'Egville.
In a couple of volumes by Mr. J.C. Cross, entitled, "Circusiana," the author of many of these old "dumb
shows," the reader can see what they were like. The scripts of these plays consisted, like our ancient "Platts"
and the Italian Scenarios, of principally stage directions.
John Palmer, the actor who died on the stage of the Theatre Royal, Liverpool—now used for the
purpose of a cold storage—after uttering, in the part of "The Stranger," the words "There is another and
a better world," found that, after building his theatre, the Royalty, in Wellclose Square, that he was prohibited
Pantomime in America. 83
its use, used to give Pantomimic representations, and just in a similar way as what the minor theatres did, as
mentioned above.
It is amusing to note how the titles of some of Shakespeare's works—which at one time the Patent
theatres had the monopoly—were got over; "Hamlet" has been known to have been played as
"Methinks I see my Father;" "Othello," as "Is He Jealous?;" "Romeo and Juliet," as "How to Die for Love;"
"The Merchant of Venice," under "Diamond Cut Diamond," and so on. Music and dancing also were
introduced ad lib into these performances.
The Pantomime of "Mother Goose," produced at Covent Garden, December 29, 1806, which ran 92 nights,
was preceded by "George Barnwell," and brought some £20,000 into the theatre treasury. Strangely enough,
for about thirty years, it was the unvarying rule to play "George Barnwell" at this theatre on a Boxing Night,
which, from all accounts, owing to the liveliness of the gods and goddesses assembled on these
occasions—the Tragedy was as much a Pantomime as the Pantomime proper that followed. Of these
"merry moments" Dibdin recalls that Tragedies, Comedies, and Operas were doomed to suffer all the
complicated combinations of "Pray ask that gentleman to sit down," "Take off your hat?" and the like. "But
the moment," continues Dibdin, "the curtain goes up (on the Pantomime), if any unfortunate gentleman speaks
a word they make no reply, but throw him over directly."
Seemingly afterwards, at Pantomime time, "Barnwell" was discarded in favour of "Jane Shore," as in "The
Theatrical Magazine" we find a writer penning the following:—
A few years since it was the established rule to play "George Barnwell," by way, we suppose, of a "great
moral lesson" to the apprentices of London. In this age of innovation this venerable custom has been broken
down, but the principle seems not wholly to have been abandoned. "Jane Shore" has supplanted "Barnwell,"
and the anxieties of the age, are, it would appear, now directed towards the softer sex. Seriously speaking, we
consider these Christmas selections as exceedingly absurd. Visitants at this period of the year frequent the
theatre less for the purpose of seeing the play than the Pantomime, and at both theatres it was this evening
their chief, and almost only, attraction; for the tragedy of Rowe, which is of very little merit, derived but
trifling interest or effect from the performers who personated the prominent characters. Moreover the lessons
of the pulpit have unfortunately but too slight an influence on those who attend them, and we are rather fearful
the moral benefits to be derived from these stage lectures, to the apprentices and servants of the metropolis, do
not countervail the loss of pleasure sustained by those who would be so much better pleased; and, therefore,
perhaps, taught by a lively comedy, satirising some of the light vices or laughable follies of the age. We trust
this theatrical nuisance will be for the future reformed; we can almost excuse the holiday folks for being
turbulent, when we reflect upon the insult offered to their understandings, in the treatment they receive on
these occasions.
In 1830, at Covent Garden Theatre, Peake introduced into the Pantomime of "Harlequin Pat, and Harlequin
Bat" a "speaking opening." Pantomime, however, pursued the even tenour of its way until the production at
the Adelphi, about 1857, of a Pantomime, with a "burlesque opening," and "the thin end of the wedge" was
provided, written by Mark Lemon. In the Harlequinade, Madame Celeste appeared as Harlequin à la Watteau,
and Miss Mary Keeley was the Columbine. These Extravaganzas, from the pen of Planché, with scenery by
Beverley, and all under the management of Vestris, afterwards became quite the rage.
I have previously referred to the excellence of Beverley's scenes under the regime of Madame Vestris.
Extravagance in Extravaganzas, like "The Blue Bird," "Once Upon a Time," and the like, caused the
managers, in the matter of scenery, to enter into serious competition with one another.
Pantomime, it was thought, was doomed, as its decease at this epoch seemed impending. It managed,
however, to come again into popular favour, but in a very different shape. Instead of the usual comic
Pantomimes made more attractive—The Restrictive Policy of thePatent Houses—"Mother Goose"

84 and "G
Pantomime it was played by two different sets of performers, and having no connection with one another. The
opening scenes, like a soap bubble, began to grow larger and larger, the double plot was abandoned, the
Transformation scene became the principal feature, and a long Harlequinade at the end.
In the Pantomime of "Red Riding Hood," written by F.W. Green, and produced at Her Majesty's Theatre,
during the 'eighties, an effort was made to compose and invent a piece of pure Pantomime. The Vokes family,
J.T. Powers, and others, appeared in this Pantomime.
In France and Italy particularly, the Mimetic Art still flourishes; but in this country it is practically a lost Art.
One of the best examples, and most successful, we have had in recent years of this ancient form of
entertainment in this country was that of "L'Enfant Prodigue," played by Mdlle. Jane May and a French
Company of Pantomimists. There are, however, several other very brilliant Pantomimists excellent in their
Art, like the Martinetti troupe, the two brothers Renad, and the Leopolds.
"It is a pity (observes Dickens, in 'The Theatre') that the knowledge of it (Pantomime) cannot be more
extended among our modern actors and actresses, so few of whom understand anything about the
effectiveness of appropriate gesture. A few lessons in the business of Harlequin would teach many a young
man, for instance, the simple lesson that arms may be moved with advantage from the shoulder as well as
from the elbow; and so we should get rid of one of the awkwardest, ugliest, and commonest of modern stage
tricks. And there would be nothing derogatory in the study. Many of our most distinguished actors have
graduated in Pantomime."
Mr. Davenport Adams, writing in "The Theatre," for January, 1882, on the decline of Pantomime,
says:—
"We may say of present-day Pantomime that the trail of the music-hall is over it all. I admit the extreme
ability of certain music-hall comedians. I object, however, altogether, to the intrusion of such artists into the
domain of Pantomime, and I do so because they, and others not so able, bring with them, so to speak, an
atmosphere which it is sad to see imported into the theatre. They bring with them, not only their songs, which,
when offensive in their wording, are sometimes made doubly dangerous by their tunefulness; not only their
dances, which are usually vulgar, when they are not inane, but their style and manner and 'gags,' which are
generally the most deplorable of all. The objection to music-hall artists on the stage is, not only that they take
the bread out of the mouths of 'the profession,' which is a minor consideration for the public, but that they
have the effect of familiarising general audiences, and children especially, with a style and a kind of singing,
dancing, and 'business' which, however it may be relished by a certain class of the population, ought steadily
to be confined to its original habitat. The managers are, of course, very much to blame, for it is by their
permission, if not by their desire, that youthful ears are regaled with 'W'st, w'st, w'st,' and similar elegant
compositions. Such songs as these would not be tolerated by paterfamilias in his drawing-room, yet, when he
takes his children to the Pantomime, they are the most prominent portion of the entertainment."
In the last century, Pantomimes, in the form so dear to our forefathers, sometimes twice yearly—at
Easter and Christmas—were given. The comic and other scenes were in that true sense of the word
humorous and funny. The reason was not far to seek, as they were all played by actors. The music-hall had
not, as far as Pantomime was concerned, made such inroads as at the present time it has done into the dramatic
profession. Clown, to pater and materfamilias, and others, was a source of genuine enjoyment; and though
they may have passed the sere and yellow leaf of age, the laughs and hearty merriment of their grand-children
gathered around them made them think of other days, when they were young themselves. Picture them all,
dear reader, sitting in the Family Circle—now termed the Dress Circle—a happy party with
smiling and contented faces, laughing at some genuine acting—Pantomime though it be—no
double entendre songs, and nothing to be ashamed of.
Pantomimes made more attractive—The Restrictive Policy of thePatent Houses—"Mother Goose"

85 and "G
To the young a visit to the Pantomime was invariably a yearly occurrence to be joyfully remembered till the
next Boxing Day came round again. Do they, or can they, understand Pantomime in its present form? I very
much doubt it.
When towards the close of the 'fifties, and the double plot was abandoned, the character of Harlequin began to
be played by women, the origin of what is now known as the "principal boy," and some acrobatic turns, or
other speciality business, began to be introduced during the course of the Pantomime, which greatly
discounted the efforts of Harlequin and Clown.
Another competitor that took up the running to the abolition of Clown and his companions, was the
music-hall, which began introducing Pantomimes and ballets. The first to do this, some years ago, was the
Canterbury, other halls soon following suit.
The managers of the theatres took up arms, with the result that various decisions, chiefly averse to the
music-halls, were obtained. A decision of the Court of Common Pleas left the music-halls in a position to give
ballets with costume and scenic effects without any such control or precautions as was exercised in theatres
under the Lord Chamberlain's authority. The duration of the litigation was all owing to the vague definition
"Stageplays in the 6 and 7 Vict. c. 68," and of "Music, dancing and public entertainments in the Act 25, Geo.
II., c. 30."
Of present-day Pantomime, with the immense sums spent annually on its gorgeous spectacular display and
costly dresses, there is no necessity for me here to dilate upon, as it is a subject that is well known to us all.
All that is beautiful about it is due principally to the scenic artists and the costumiers. The best parts are, as a
general rule, allotted to music-hall "stars," whose names will draw the most money. And the followers of
Thespis have, until the reign of King Pantomime is over, to take oftentimes second-class places in the
Pantomimic form of entertainment of the present day.
In the old days everyone looked forward to the performances of Clown and his companions; but little by little
their business went, until finally this has dwindled down to about one or two scenes—which, in some
few instances is still retained.
And now to formally "ring down," and in writing the "tag," there is, I may say, with the sound of the
prompter's bell, a melancholy ring as the passing knell of Clown and his merry companions, and the "tag," as
it were, their epitaph.
Pantomimes—as our forefathers knew them—have become a thing of the past, and the survivors,
Clown and his comrades, the former whose quips and quiddities, in childhood's happy days, many of us still
lovingly remember; the wonderment with which we gazed at the magical tricks wrought by Harlequin and his
wand; the quaint conceits and ambling gait of Pantaloon; and, last but not least, bewitching Columbine, with
whom, most likely as each year came round, in youthful ardour we fell anew in love's toils, are all rapidly
vanishing into the dim and distant past, and to live in the future only in the memory.
CURTAIN.
***END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A HISTORY OF PANTOMIME***
CURTAIN. 86
******* This file should be named 13469-h.txt or 13469-h.zip *******
This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
http://www.gutenberg.net/1/3/4/6/13469
Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will be renamed.
Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no one owns a United States copyright in
these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without permission
and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this
license, apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT
GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used
if you charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you do not charge anything for copies
of this eBook, complying with the rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as
creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research. They may be modified and printed and given
away--you may do practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is subject to the
trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.
*** START: FULL LICENSE ***
THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE

PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free

distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
http://gutenberg.net/license).
Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm

electronic works
1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm

electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be

used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
CURTAIN. 87
Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
works. See paragraph 1.E below.
1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"

or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an
individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in
a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check
the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning
the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
States.
1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
copied or distributed:
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net
1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived

from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
CURTAIN. 88
through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
1.E.9.
1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted

with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked
to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm

License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this

electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg-tm License.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.net),
you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,

performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing

access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
that
- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is
owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments
must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
CURTAIN. 89
address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
License. You must require such a user to return or
destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
Project Gutenberg-tm works.
- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any

money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
of receipt of the work.
- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm

electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the
Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
1.F.
1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable

effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
your equipment.
1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right

of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
CURTAIN. 90
DAMAGE.
1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a

defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with
the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy
is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
opportunities to fix the problem.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS,' WITH NO OTHER
WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied

warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of

electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists
because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
people in all walks of life.
Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the

assistance they need, is critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
CURTAIN. 91
remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.
Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive

Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit

501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
http://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.

Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at
809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact
information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
page at http://pglaf.org
For additional contact information:

Dr. Gregory B. Newby
Chief Executive and Director
gbnewby@pglaf.org
Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg

Literary Archive Foundation
Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide

spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
status with the IRS.
The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating

charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To
SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
CURTAIN. 92
particular state visit http://pglaf.org
While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we

have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
approach us with offers to donate.
International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make

any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
ways including including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate
Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic

works.
Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm

concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed

editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily
keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
Each eBook is in a subdirectory of the same number as the eBook's

eBook number, often in several formats including plain vanilla ASCII,
compressed (zipped), HTML and others.
Corrected EDITIONS of our eBooks replace the old file and take over
the old filename and etext number. The replaced older file is renamed.
VERSIONS based on separate sources are treated as new eBooks receiving
new filenames and etext numbers.
Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:
http://www.gutenberg.net
This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,

including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
EBooks posted prior to November 2003, with eBook numbers BELOW #10000,
are filed in directories based on their release date. If you want to
download any of these eBooks directly, rather than using the regular
CURTAIN. 93
search system you may utilize the following addresses and just
download by the etext year.
http://www.ibiblio.org/gutenberg/etext06
(Or /etext 05, 04, 03, 02, 01, 00, 99,

98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 92, 91 or 90)
EBooks posted since November 2003, with etext numbers OVER #10000, are
filed in a different way. The year of a release date is no longer part
of the directory path. The path is based on the etext number (which is
identical to the filename). The path to the file is made up of single
digits corresponding to all but the last digit in the filename. For
example an eBook of filename 10234 would be found at:
or filename 24689 would be found at:

An alternative method of locating eBooks:

http://www.gutenberg.net/GUTINDEX.ALL
*** END: FULL LICENSE ***
CURTAIN. 94

A History of Pantomime by Broadbent, R. J.

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

A History of Pantomime by Broadbent, R. J.

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

A History of Pantomime by Broadbent, R. J.

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Project Gutenberg eBook, A History of Pantomime, by R.

Title: A History of Pantomime

Release Date: September 15, 2004 [eBook #13469]

Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1

***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A HISTORY OF PANTOMIME***

E-text prepared by Jonathan Ingram, Linda Cantoni,

The Project Gutenberg eBook, A History of Pantomime, by R. J. Broadbent 1

Author of "STAGE WHISPERS," etc.

WILLIAM WADE, ESQUIRE.

Origin of Tragedy and Comedy—Mythology—The meaning of the word Pantomime—The

Mythology—Transformation Scenes—The rise of Grecian Tragedy and Comedy—The

The origin of the Indian Drama—Aryan Mythology—Clown and Columbine—Origin of the

"Dancing," i.e. Pantomime—Grecian Dancing and Pantomimic

Thespis—The Progress of Tragedy and Comedy—Aeschylus—The

Roman Theatres—Description—"Deadheads"—Pantomime in Italy—Livius

The Clown or Fool of the early English Drama&mdash;Moralities&mdash;The

The Italian Masque&mdash;The Masque in England&mdash;First appearance in this country

Pantomimical Characters&mdash;Neapolitan Pantomime&mdash;The Harlequin

Italian Scenarios and English "Platts"&mdash;Pantaloon&mdash;Tarleton, the

Introduction of Pantomimes to the English Stage&mdash;Weaver's "History of the Mimes

John Rich and his Pantomimes&mdash;Rich's Miming&mdash;Garrick, Walpole,

Pantomimic Families&mdash;Giuseppe Grimaldi&mdash;James Byrne, the Harlequin and

Popular Pantomime subjects&mdash;Poor Pantomime Librettos&mdash;Pantomime subjects

Pantomimes made more attractive&mdash;The Restrictive Policy of the Patent

Liverpool, December, 1901.

"Pan taught to join with wax unequal reeds;

Origin of Tragedy and Comedy&mdash;Mythology&mdash;The

Origin of Tragedy and Comedy&mdash;Mythology&mdash;Themeaning of the word Pantomime&mdash;The

Origin of Tragedy and Comedy&mdash;Mythology&mdash;Themeaning of the word Pantomime&mdash;The

"Mercury! Atlas' smooth-tongued boy, whose will

"'Tis thine the unbodied spirits of the blessed,

Origin of Tragedy and Comedy&mdash;Mythology&mdash;Themeaning of the word Pantomime&mdash;The

Origin of Tragedy and Comedy&mdash;Mythology&mdash;Themeaning of the word Pantomime&mdash;The

Appropriately does Horace observe:&mdash;

"Nor was the flute at first with silver bound,

The origin of the Indian Drama&mdash;Aryan

The progenitors of the Indo-European race, the Aryans&mdash;in Sanscrit meaning

The Hindoo dramatic writer, Babhavñti&mdash;the Indian Shakespeare&mdash;introduced with success in

The origin of the Indian Drama&mdash;AryanMythology&mdash;Clown and Columbine&mdash;Origin of 17

The origin of the Indian Drama&mdash;AryanMythology&mdash;Clown and Columbine&mdash;Origin of 18

"Dancing," i.e. Pantomime&mdash;Grecian Dancing and Pantomimic

The Hyplomachia imitated a fight with shields.

"Dancing," i.e. Pantomime&mdash;Grecian Dancing and PantomimicScenes&mdash;Aristotle&mdash;Homer&mdash

Thespis&mdash;The Progress of Tragedy and

Thespis&mdash;The Progress of Tragedy andComedy&mdash;Aeschylus&mdash;TheEpopée&mdash;Homer&mdash

Thespis&mdash;The Progress of Tragedy andComedy&mdash;Aeschylus&mdash;TheEpopée&mdash;Homer&mdash

RomanTheatres&mdash;Description&mdash;"Deadheads"&mdash;Pantomimein Italy&mdash;Livius Andronicus&md

RomanTheatres&mdash;Description&mdash;"Deadheads"&mdash;Pantomimein Italy&mdash;Livius Andronicus&md

RomanTheatres&mdash;Description&mdash;"Deadheads"&mdash;Pantomimein Italy&mdash;Livius Andronicus&md

RomanTheatres&mdash;Description&mdash;"Deadheads"&mdash;Pantomimein Italy&mdash;Livius Andronicus&md

"Nunc vos aequim est, manibus meritis,

RomanTheatres&mdash;Description&mdash;"Deadheads"&mdash;Pantomimein Italy&mdash;Livius Andronicus&md

Introduction of the Roman Pantomimic Art into Britain&mdash;First

"Not that I think those Pantomimes,

given in those open-air theatres by the Romans.

"The drama's now a great established fact,

Pantomime in the English Mystery or Miracle Plays and

The Clown or Fool of the early English

"Tell country players, that old paltry jests

START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A HISTORY OF PANTOMIME

The Clown or Fool of the early English Drama—Moralities—The

The Italian Masque—The Masque in England—First appearance in this country

Pantomimical Characters—Neapolitan Pantomime—The Harlequin

Italian Scenarios and English "Platts"—Pantaloon—Tarleton, the

Introduction of Pantomimes to the English Stage—Weaver's "History of the Mimes

John Rich and his Pantomimes—Rich's Miming—Garrick, Walpole,

Pantomimic Families—Giuseppe Grimaldi—James Byrne, the Harlequin and

Popular Pantomime subjects—Poor Pantomime Librettos—Pantomime subjects

Pantomimes made more attractive—The Restrictive Policy of the Patent

Origin of Tragedy and Comedy—Mythology—The

Origin of Tragedy and Comedy—Mythology—Themeaning of the word Pantomime—The

Origin of Tragedy and Comedy—Mythology—Themeaning of the word Pantomime—The

Origin of Tragedy and Comedy—Mythology—Themeaning of the word Pantomime—The

Origin of Tragedy and Comedy—Mythology—Themeaning of the word Pantomime—The

Appropriately does Horace observe:—

The origin of the Indian Drama—Aryan

The progenitors of the Indo-European race, the Aryans—in Sanscrit meaning

The Hindoo dramatic writer, Babhavñti—the Indian Shakespeare—introduced with success in

The origin of the Indian Drama—AryanMythology—Clown and Columbine—Origin of 17

The origin of the Indian Drama—AryanMythology—Clown and Columbine—Origin of 18

"Dancing," i.e. Pantomime—Grecian Dancing and Pantomimic

"Dancing," i.e. Pantomime—Grecian Dancing and PantomimicScenes—Aristotle—Homer&mdash

Thespis—The Progress of Tragedy and

Thespis—The Progress of Tragedy andComedy—Aeschylus—TheEpopée—Homer&mdash

Thespis—The Progress of Tragedy andComedy—Aeschylus—TheEpopée—Homer&mdash

RomanTheatres—Description—"Deadheads"—Pantomimein Italy—Livius Andronicus&md

RomanTheatres—Description—"Deadheads"—Pantomimein Italy—Livius Andronicus&md

RomanTheatres—Description—"Deadheads"—Pantomimein Italy—Livius Andronicus&md

RomanTheatres—Description—"Deadheads"—Pantomimein Italy—Livius Andronicus&md

RomanTheatres—Description—"Deadheads"—Pantomimein Italy—Livius Andronicus&md

Introduction of the Roman Pantomimic Art into Britain—First

The Clown or Fool of the early EnglishDrama—Moralities—The Interlude—The rise ofEnglish

2.—The Clown, who was a mere country booby, or a witty rustic.

3.—The female fool, who was generally an idiot.

4.—The city or corporation fool, an assistant in public entertainments.

5.—The tavern fool, retained to amuse the customers.

7.—The fool in the old dumb shows, often alluded to by Shakespeare.

8.—The fool in the Whitsun ales and morris dance.

9.—The mountebank's fool, or merry Andrew.

The Clown or Fool of the early EnglishDrama—Moralities—The Interlude—The rise ofEnglish

The Clown or Fool of the early EnglishDrama—Moralities—The Interlude—The rise ofEnglish

The Italian Masque—The Masque in England—First

Masque—Decline of the Masque.

The Italian Masque—The Masque in England—Firstappearance in this country of Harlequin—Joe

The Italian Masque—The Masque in England—Firstappearance in this country of Harlequin—Joe

Pantomimical Characters—Neapolitan Pantomime—The

Pantomimical Characters—Neapolitan Pantomime—TheHarlequin Family—The Original

Pantomimical Characters—Neapolitan Pantomime—TheHarlequin Family—The Original

Pantomimical Characters—Neapolitan Pantomime—TheHarlequin Family—The Original

Pantomimical Characters—Neapolitan Pantomime—TheHarlequin Family—The Original

Pantomimical Characters—Neapolitan Pantomime—TheHarlequin Family—The Original

Italian Scenarios and English"Platts"—Pantaloon—Tarleton, theClown—Extemporal Comedy&md

Italian Scenarios and English"Platts"—Pantaloon—Tarleton, theClown—Extemporal Comedy&md

Italian Scenarios and English"Platts"—Pantaloon—Tarleton, theClown—Extemporal Comedy&md

Introduction of Pantomimes to the English Stage—Weaver's

Another Pantomime of Weaver's was "The Judgment of Paris"—date uncertain—performed by

Introduction of Pantomimes to the English Stage—Weaver's"History of the Mimes and Pantomimes"—W

John Rich and his Pantomimes—Rich's

Of Rich and his early Pantomimes, Davies observes:—

Of Rich, Garrick wrote:—

John Rich and his Pantomimes—Rich'sMiming—-Garrick, Walpole, Foote—Anecdotes57

John Rich and his Pantomimes—Rich'sMiming—-Garrick, Walpole, Foote—Anecdotes58

John Rich and his Pantomimes—Rich'sMiming—-Garrick, Walpole, Foote—Anecdotes59

John Rich and his Pantomimes—Rich'sMiming—-Garrick, Walpole, Foote—Anecdotes60

Chetwood—William Rufus Chetwood—who had, in the eighteenth century, a bookseller's shop

John Rich and his Pantomimes—Rich'sMiming—-Garrick, Walpole, Foote—Anecdotes61

John Rich and his Pantomimes—Rich'sMiming—-Garrick, Walpole, Foote—Anecdotes62

A contemporary writer of Grimaldi's days thus eulogises the Prince of Clowns:—

Plots of the old form of Pantomimes—A description of

Pantomimic Families—Giuseppe Grimaldi—James Byrne,

Pantomimic Families—Giuseppe Grimaldi—James Byrne,the Harlequin and Inventor of the modern

Pantomimic Families—Giuseppe Grimaldi—James Byrne,the Harlequin and Inventor of the modern

Popular Pantomime subjects—Poor Pantomime

Popular Pantomime subjects—Poor PantomimeLibrettos—Pantomime subjects of our progenitors&mdash

Popular Pantomime subjects—Poor PantomimeLibrettos—Pantomime subjects of our progenitors&mdash

Popular Pantomime subjects—Poor PantomimeLibrettos—Pantomime subjects of our progenitors&mdash