Project Human Resource Management: HR Records
Project Human Resource Management: HR Records
Project Human Resource Management: HR Records
Human Resources
2009
HR rds Reco
Introduction
HRD is about improved performance and productivity through increased know edge! competencies! ski s! and attitudes" In other words! HRD is about earning! its effects on emp oyees! and its impact on the organi#ation" $he manager of HRD is the person responsib e for the management of earning within the organi#ation and the deve opment of programs and activities that foster growth" $his ro e is often viewed as the primary ro e of a manager of HRD" It consist% the five basic e ements of management&p anning! organi#ing! staffing! contro ing! and marketing"
2
(nvironment P anning
1"Importance of strategic p anning to the HRD department 2" )taff recruitment! se ection! hiring! eva uation! and deve opment *" HRD po icies! procedures! and standards +" ,inancia management -" Management of e.uipment and faci ities /" )upervision of staff and operation 0" Program schedu e 11" (nvironmenta maintenance
'
Resource Method
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 (mp oyee Deve opment (mp oyee )e ection Methods 3ision and mission $raining and deve opment Documentation and standards 4eeping a 5orporate 5u ture 6 ive Performance 6ppraisa
*
11
2 2 2
Performance 6ppraisa
2 1 job resu tsLoutcome 2 essay method ' Ranking * ,orced Distribution + Craphic Rating )ca e - Behaviora 5heck ist 8 Behaviora 6nchored Rating )ca es <B6R)= / Management by ?bjectives <MB?
Principles
2 $his is a statement about the genera view by the management of emp oyment in the organi#ation" It is ike y to carry ringing phrases about teamwork! fairness! innovation and opportunity! but may a so inc ude a dec aration about the degree and method of emp oyee invo vement and the security of emp oyment in different parts of the workforce"
"mployee relations
2 Po icies in the area of emp oyee re ations wi depend on the union recognition situation! but typica features are arrangements about recognition! bargaining units and union membership agreements! agreeMments re ating to negotiation! consu tation! shop steward representation! membership of joint committees! safety matters and points of reference! such as fo owing nationa engineering agreements on the number of days7 annua ho iday"
M t al control
2 )evera features of po icy and re ated procedure dea with the working re ationship between the organi#ation and the emp oyee or emp oyees" $hese are main y to dea with the approach to matters of grievance and discip ine"
"mployment Intervie's
2 $he emp oyment interview is a vehic e for information e:change between app icant and interviewer regarding an app icant7s suitabi ity and interest in a job the emp oyer seeks to fi " Information provided in an app icant7s app ication for emp oyment can be probed more deep y in the interview! and other information re evant to an app icant7s .ua ifications can be e icited" )ince interviews can be rather f e:ib e! any missing pieces of information about an app icant can be co ected at this time"
Personality %est
2 Peop e often be ieve that certain jobs re.uire uni.ue persona ities or temperaments" ,or e:amp e! an accountant may be thought of as conservative! meticu ous! and .uiet! whi e a usedGcar sa esman may be pictured as aggressive! f ashy! and smooth ta king" Dhi e it is probab y true that some FtypesF of peop e occupy certain jobs! there is itt e evidence that peop e must have a specific persona ity type to be successfu at a particu ar type of job" It is more common that the job itse f shapes the job ho der7s behavior! and peop e stereotype others by their job behavior
$"+"#%I,2 $he e:p icit goa of the se ection process is to identify and hire individua s who have the know edge! ski s! and abi ities to perform the jobs within the organi#ation successfu y" But! typica y! more than one candidate wi be identified who meets any given job7s re.uirements" Dhen that point is reached! it wou d be naive to ignore that the fina decision as to who is hired wi be significant y inf uenced by the decision maker7s judgment of how we the candidates wi fit into the organi#ation" $his attempt to ensure a proper match! whether purpose y or inadvertent y! resu ts in the hiring of peop e who have va ues essentia y consistent with those of the organi#ation! or at east a good portion of those va ues"
%,P M(-(."M"-%
2 $he actions of top management a so have a major impact on the organi#ation7s cu ture" $hrough what they say and how they behave! senior e:ecutives estab ish norms that fi ter down through the organi#ation as to whether riskG taking is desirab e% how much freedom managers shou d give their subordinates% what is appropriate dress% what actions wi pay off in terms of pay raises! promotions! and other rewards% and the ike"
$,#I(+I/(%I,2 @o matter how good a job the organi#ation does in recruiting and se ection! new emp oyees are not fu y indoctrinated in the organi#ation7s cu ture" Maybe most important! because they are unfami iar with the organi#ation7s cu ture! new emp oyees are potentia y ike y to disturb the be iefs and customs that are in p ace" $he organi#ation wi ! thereMfore! want to he p new emp oyees adapt to its cu ture" $his adaptation process is ca ed socia i#ation
"ssay Met0od
2 $he essay method invo ves an eva uator7s written report appraising an emp oyee7s performance! usua y in terms of job behaviors andLor resu ts" $he subject of an essay appraisa is often justification of pay! promotion! or termination decisions! but essays can be used for deve opmenta purposes as we "
Ran*in!
2 Ranking methods compare one emp oyee to another! resu ting in an ordering of emp oyees in re ation to one another" Rankings often resu t in overa assessments of emp oyees! rather than in specific judgments about a number of job components" )traight ranking re.uires an eva uator to order a group of emp oyees from best to worst overa or from most effective to east effective in terms of a certain criterion" 6 ternative ranking makes the same demand! but the ranking process must be done in a specified manner <for e:amp e! by first se ecting the best emp oyee in a group! then the worst! then the secondG best! then the secondGworst! etc"="
.rap0ic Ratin!
2 Craphic rating sca es are one of the most common methods of performance appraisa " Craphic rating sca es re.uire an eva uator to indicate on a sca e the degree to which an emp oyee demonstrates a particu ar trait! behavior! or performance resu t" Rating forms are composed of a number of sca es! each re ating to a certain job or performanceGre ated dimension! such as job know edge! responsibi ity! or .ua ity of work" (ach sca e is a continuum of sca e points! or anchors! which range from high to ow! from good to poor! from most to east effective! and so forth" )ca es typica y have from five to seven points! though they can have more or ess" Craphic rating sca es may or may not define their sca e points"
4e0avioral #0ec*list
2 6 behaviora check ist is a rating form containing statements describing both effective and ineffective job behaviors" $hese behaviors re ate to a number of behaviora dimensions determined to be re evant to the job"
( 1riendly Place
2 It may sound trite! but friend iness appears to be one of the distinguishing characteristics of good workp aces" Peop e seem to enjoy each other7s company" $his is not an insignificant issue" Dork for an organi#ation is! after a ! work in a group setting" It7s very different! for instance! from the most y so itary work of a nove ist or a painter" Dhen you work for an organi#ation! other peop e don7t disappear" Aou are forced to interact with others! with your coGworkers and your boss or your subordinates" Dhat you think about your workp ace has to do arge y with the .ua ity of those interactions"