Airway Clearance Techniques and Hyperinflation Therapy Walsh Chapter 12
Airway Clearance Techniques and Hyperinflation Therapy Walsh Chapter 12
Airway Clearance Techniques and Hyperinflation Therapy Walsh Chapter 12
12
OUTLINE
History and Current Status of Airway Clearance Techniques Physiological and Pathophysiological Considerations Traditional Airway Clearance Therapy Techniques Postural Drainage Percussion Postural Drainage and Percussion Vibration of the Chest Wall Airway Clearance Therapy Behavioral Issues Adverse Consequences Cough Forced Expiration Technique Coughing and Forced Expiration Technique Positive Expiratory Pressure Therapy Autogenic Drainage Positive Expiratory Pressure Therapy and Autogenic Drainage High-Frequency Chest Compression High-Frequency Chest Wall Oscillation Effectiveness of Techniques Complications of Airway Clearance Therapy Hypoxemia Airway Obstruction and Respiratory Arrest Intracranial Complications Rib Fractures and Bruising Airway Trauma Selection of Patients for Airway Clearance Therapy Conditions in Which Airway Clearance Therapy May Not Be Benecial Conditions in Which Airway Clearance Therapy May Be Benecial Contraindications Length and Frequency of Therapy Therapy Modication Monitoring During Therapy Evaluation of Therapy Documentation of Therapy Hyperination Therapy Incentive Spirometry Intermittent Positive-Pressure Breathing Indications, Contraindications, and Complications Equipment Assessment of Therapy Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation Indications, Contraindications, and Complications Assessment of Therapy Future of Airway Clearance Therapy
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After reading this chapter the reader will be able to: 1. Explain the indications and risks of airway clearance techniques 2. Apply the various techniques of airway clearance 3. Understand how to avoid complications associated with airway clearance techniques 4. Understand the role of hyperination therapy and its relationship to proper airway clearance
KEY TERMS
Airway clearance technique (ACT) Cough Hyperination therapy Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) therapy
197
198
SECTION I Section Title producing secretions, we should do something about it. Although most studies have focused on the primary outcome of sputum production, it is not clear whether or not sputum volume is an appropriate indication or outcome of airway clearance. There is a perception that airway clearance may not help, but it wont hurt either. This attitude can lead to inappropriate orders and inadvertent complications. Many airway clearance techniques are not benign, particularly if they are not used as intended.
Traditional airway clearance techniques (ACT) are designed to remove secretions from the lungs and include postural drainage, percussion, chest wall vibration, and coughing. Newer techniques considered part of ACT are maneuvers to improve the efcacy of cough, such as the following: The forced expiration technique (FET) Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) therapy High-frequency chest compression (HFCC) Insufatorexsufator (e.g., Cough Assist) High-frequency chest wall oscillation with Cough Assist Intrapulmonary percussive ventilation Specialized breathing techniques, such as autogenic drainage (AD) Because all these techniques share the same goal removal of bronchial secretionsthe term bronchial drainage is often employed to describe them collectively. This term may be preferable to ACT because it highlights the aims, rather than the means, of treatment. This chapter is devoted to describing and analyzing bronchial drainage techniques and how they should be applied to the infant or pediatric patient with lung disease or respiratory impairment.
FIGURE 12-1 Compression of the airways creates moving choke points or stenosis that facilitate mucus expulsion. Narrowing of the airway is required, but complete obstruction will inhibit this transfer.
CHAPTER 12 Airway Clearance Techniques and Hyperination Therapy pulmonary compliance and greater elasticity than adults, leading to a lower functional residual capacity (FRC) compared with their total lung capacity, which promotes premature airway closure.15 The bronchus will collapse as pleural pressure exceeds intralumen airway pressure. This collapse is avoided by opposing forces that make up the rigidity of the airway structure, specically smooth muscle in the peripheral airways and cartilage in the central airways. In infants, especially premature infants, the airway cartilage is less developed and more compliant than that of older children and adults.16 This increased yielding leads to greater airway collapse at lower changes in pleural and airway pressure. Common neonatal disease states reduce pulmonary compliance and produce bronchial wall edema, enhancing the risk of airway collapse. The clinical picture of airway collapse often prompts ACT or bronchodilator orders. This airway collapse can be further exaggerated when chest percussion is performed or bronchodilators administered. Bronchodilators cause a decrease in smooth muscle tone, leading to increased collapsibility. This is why continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or PEP can be therapeutic in patients with airway collapse, because it tends to improve their FRC and establishes a fundamental airway clearance mechanism of producing air behind the secretions. Efforts to increase FRC can be valuable tools in your airway clearance arsenal. Airway resistance is disproportionately high in children at baseline. Small changes in airway diameter such as caused by edema, secretions, a foreign body, or inammation can lead to drastic changes in resistance. This decrease in airow limits the childs ability to expel secretions and may contribute to the work of breathing. Furthermore, the upper airway, particularly the nose, can contribute up to 50% of the airway resistance, which is only compounded by nasal congestion.17 Interalveolar pores of Kohn and bronchiolar-alveolar canals of Lambert are compensatory mechanisms that contribute to the aeration of gas exchange units distal to obstructed airways in older children and adults. (Figure 12-2)
199
Yet these are missing in infants, in whom these collaterals are not well developed. This can hinder airway clearance and lead to large areas of atelectasis.
Postural Drainage
Postural drainage attempts to use gravity to move secretions from peripheral airways to the larger bronchi, from which they are more easily expectorated. The patient is placed in various positions, each designed to drain specic segments of the lung, and may be supported by rolled towels, blankets, or pillows. Figures 12-3 and 12-4 illustrate postural drainage positions used in infants and children.13 Other versions incorporating minor variations have also been published.2,19,20 Postural drainage can be performed with or without percussion or vibration. When accompanied by percussion or vibration, each position is maintained for 1 to 5 minutes, depending on the severity of the patients condition. When percussion or vibration is omitted, longer periods of simple postural drainage can be performed.
Percussion
Percussion is believed to loosen secretions from the bronchial walls. While the patient is in the various postural drainage positions, the clinician percusses the chest wall, using a cupped hand (see Figure 12-5). The areas to be percussed are illustrated in Figures 12-3 and 12-4. Clinicians should not percuss over bony prominences; over the spine, sternum, abdomen, last few ribs, sutured areas, drainage tubes, kidneys, or liver; or below the rib cage. The ideal frequency of percussion is unknown; however, some reports recommend a frequency of 5 to 6 Hz (300-360 blows per minute), whereas others recommend slow, rhythmic clapping.19,21 Several devices can be used for percussion, including soft facemasks as well as those commercially designed, such as palm cups and mechanical percussors (Figure 12-6). Infants and children may have percussion performed in the lap of the clinician. However, if the patient is mechanically ventilated or has multiple tubes and intravenous lines in place, it may be preferable to perform therapy with the patient in the bed. Catheters, tubes, and indwelling lines are easily dislodged in infants and young children, and appropriate care must be taken.
Obstructing mucus
Canal of Lambert
FIGURE 12-2 The location of collateral airways such as the interalveolar pores of Kohn and bronchiolar-alveolar canals of Lambert.
Many investigations have been conducted to determine the relative importance of percussion, vibration, and postural drainage. In a study designed to determine the
200
D C H I
E
FIGURE 12-3 Postural drainage positions for infants and younger children.. A, Apical segment of the right upper lobe and apical subsegment of the apicalposterior segment of the left upper lobe. B, Posterior segment of the right upper lobe and posterior subsegment of the apicalposterior segment of the left upper lobe. C, Anterior segments of right and left upper lobes. D, Superior segments of both lower lobes. E, Posterior basal segments of both lower lobes. Postural drainage positions for infants. F, Lateral basal segment of the right lower lobe. Lateral basal segment of the left lower lobe is drained in a similar fashion but with the right side down. G, Anterior basal segment of the right lower lobe. The segments on the left side are drained in a similar fashion but with the right side down. H, Right middle lobe. I, Left lingular segment of lower lobe.
contribution of these maneuvers to clearance of mucus, there was no demonstration of improvement in clearance of mucus from the lung when percussion, vibration, or breathing exercises were added to postural drainage.22 These investigators also showed that FET was superior to simple coughing and when combined with postural drainage was the most effective form of treatment.23 Other studies24-26 have reported the following: 1. Percussion without postural drainage or cough produced minimal change in the clearance of mucus.
2. When compared with simple postural drainage, chest percussion actually reduced the amount of sputum mobilized. 3. Manual self-percussion did not increase the amount of sputum expectorated compared with simple postural drainage in a group of patients with cystic brosis (CF).
201
18 18
E F
18
14
14
FIGURE 12-4 Postural drainage positions for the child or adult. The model of the tracheobronchial tree next to or above the child illustrates the segmental bronchi being drained. The stippled area on the childs chest illustrates the area to be percussed or vibrated. A, Apical segment of right upper lobe and apical subsegment of apicalposterior segment of left upper lobe (area between the clavicle and top of the scapula). B, Posterior segment of right upper lobe and posterior subsegment of apicalposterior segment of left upper lobe (area over the upper back). Postural drainage positions for the child or adult. The model of the tracheobronchial tree next to or above the child illustrates the segmental bronchi being drained. The stippled area on the childs chest illustrates the area to be percussed or vibrated. C, Anterior segments of right and left upper lobes (area between clavicle and nipple). D, Superior segments of both lower lobes (area over middle of back at tip of scapula, beside spine). E, Posterior basal segments of both lower lobes (area over lower rib cage, beside spine). F, Lateral basal segment of right lower lobe. Segment on left is drained in a similar fashion but with the right side down (area over middle portion of rib cage). G, Anterior basal segment of left lower lobe. Segment on right is drained in a similar fashion but with the left side down (area over lower ribs, below the armpit). H, Right middle lobe (area over right nipple; below breast in developing females). I, Left lingular segment of lower lobe (area over left nipple; below breast in developing females).
202
SECTION I Section Title All percussion and vibration devices should be cleaned after each use and between patients.
B
FIGURE 12-5 A, Cupped hand position for percussion. B, Device for infant percussion. From Hockenberry M, Wilson D: Wongs nursing care of infants and children, ed 9, St. Louis: Mosby, 2011.
secretions. Unlike in percussion, the clinicians hand does not lose contact with the chest wall during the procedure. Vibrations are performed by placing both hands (one over the other) over the area to be vibrated and tensing and contracting the shoulder and arm muscles while the patient exhales. To prolong exhalation, the patient may be asked to breathe through pursed lips or make a hissing sound. As with percussion, the ideal frequency is unknown, although some recommend 10 to 15 Hz.27 It is unclear how well clinicians are able to perform vibrations at this frequency. Several mechanical vibrators are commercially available. Some models of mechanical percussors or vibrators are appropriate only for the newborn or premature infant, whereas other models are appropriate for the larger child. When evaluating such devices, the clinician should consider whether the appearance and sound of the device will be frightening and whether the amount of force is appropriate for the size of the patient.
Behavioral Issues
When missing the key component of cooperation, airway clearance becomes much more difcult. The potential for harm during airway clearance modalities increases as transpulmonary pressure swings increase.13 When forceful crying occurs during airway clearance, these swings create an environment suitable for lung damage. All efforts to decrease crying, such as facilitated tucking or modied
CHAPTER 12 Airway Clearance Techniques and Hyperination Therapy ACT, should be incorporated. In modalities that administer pressure to aid airway clearance, less pressure should be administered to a noncooperative child. For older patients, a multidisciplinary approach can increase airway clearance quantity and quality by 50%.30 This approach, utilized by Ernst et al., involves allowing for patient selection of airway clearance protocol, creating a reward system for the patient, and scheduling priority given to airway clearance.30 When performing ACT on young children, the clinician must make a special effort to secure the patients condence and cooperation. Spending a few moments to gain the childs condence is well worth the effort. Assigning the same clinician to treat the child as often as is practical may be useful in establishing a rapport. Likewise, allowing the child as much control over the situation as possible, such as deciding which lobes will be treated rst, may increase the childs sense of control and reduce hospitalization-related anxiety. Having a parent available during therapy, especially when the child is unfamiliar with ACT, is useful as well. ACT may be extremely uncomfortable for the postoperative patient, and routine use of ACT in these patients may actually promote atelectasis. Some patients, however, suffer from excessive secretions or mucous plugging and atelectasis. Performing ACT in these patients can be difcult. Adequate analgesia is essential, and attempts should be made to schedule ACT shortly after pain medication is administered. Coughing is also a considerable source of discomfort in pediatric patients postoperatively. Cough efcacy can be improved if the patient is taught to splint the wounds when coughing. Holding a pillow over the incision may also be useful in minimizing movement of the incision when coughing.
203
ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES
Several conditions common to the full-term or preterm newborn suggest that these infants may be at risk for increased complications from ACT; therefore, modication of routine ACT procedures is advisable. Because the newborn has high chest wall compliance, the loss of lung volume caused by chest wall compression (e.g., from percussion) may be greater in the infant than in the adult.31 For this reason, some institutions routinely omit chest wall percussion in neonatal ACT treatments, opting instead for the use of small vibrators. Because an infants chest wall is not as thick as an adults and the infants ribs are more cartilaginous, a gentler touch is required during therapy.32 Hypoxemia has been reported after ACT in the newborn.33-36 Handling infants, for whatever reason, often results in hypoxemia. It is therefore essential that oxygenation be monitored during ACT in infants. Routine application of ACT in the preterm infant has been associated with an increased risk of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH).37 The preterm infant is unable to adequately regulate cerebral blood ow, and changes in blood
pressure often lead to increased intracranial pressure and volume, with rupture of immature blood vessels. Trendelenburg positioning and chest wall percussion would seem likely to increase cerebral blood ow and to reduce venous return, further increasing the risk of IVH. Therefore these procedures should be used sparingly, if at all, in infants at risk. If possible, ACT should be withheld from infants at high risk for IVH (i.e., very premature infants in the rst few days of life). Critically ill newborns are unable to adequately maintain body temperature and are therefore routinely placed in incubators or under radiant warmers. Caregiver interventions of any kind, including ACT, interfere with maintaining temperature stability, especially for infants in closed incubators. Treatment time with these patients should be kept to a minimum, usually between 5 and 10 minutes. If a patient is in a temperature-regulated environment, special attention must be given to preventing heat loss during therapy. The trachea and bronchi of the newborn appear especially vulnerable to damaging effects from endotracheal tubes and suction catheters. Consequences of deep endotracheal suctioning include the development of bronchial stenosis and granulomas. Avoiding deep endotracheal suctioning minimizes risks.38 Therefore, when suctioning intubated infants after ACT, the suction catheter should not be routinely advanced beyond the end of the endotracheal tube. If there is evidence of persistent secretion retention despite adequate suction of the endotracheal tube, the suction catheter can be carefully and slowly advanced 1 or 2 cm beyond the tip of the endotracheal tube. Many infants in the neonatal intensive care unit are sensitive to handling. This is especially true of the preterm infant as well as the full-term infant with pulmonary hypertension, who may develop hypoxemia or bradycardia in response to excessive stimulation. Many clinicians believe that clustering as many caregiver interventions as possible can minimize the adverse consequences of handling, thereby leaving the infant undisturbed for longer periods. Minimizing excessive light and sound associated with therapy is also desirable.
Cough
All ACT sessions should end with a period of deep breathing and coughing. Patients with minimal lung disease should be able to clear the lungs after one or two attempts. Those with severe lung disease or neuromuscular weakness may need more prolonged coughing periods or coughing assistance (e.g., tussive squeezes, insufator exsufator, abdominal compression). Prolonged periods of unproductive coughing should be avoided because they may tire the patient. The clinician should emphasize effective, productive coughing. Infants may require nasopharyngeal suction to stimulate a cough, whereas patients with articial airways may require endotracheal suctioning.
204
The following procedures are sometimes incorporated into ACT treatments, or used independently, with the aim of promoting bronchial drainage: (1) FET, (2) PEP therapy with Cough Assist, (3) AD, and (4) automatic high frequency chest wall compression HFCWC/high-frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO).
Cough Assist
The insufatorexsufator, or Cough Assist, has shown to be benecial in patients with neuromuscular weakness by simply supporting their cough effort. This blower-driven device provides positive airow and pressure to increase their FRC and allow air distal to the mucus. The increase in FRC allows their weak muscles the best advantage possible to create a cough. Then it creates a negative ow and pressure to help simulate a cough.52 Streigl et al. demonstrated in an infant lung model with a tracheostomy tube that insufation time of 1 second or more is required for the insufattorexsufator to achieve equilibration of alveolar pressure to insufation pressure. They also discovered that longer exsufation time does not signicantly alter maximum expiratory owrate.52 Vienello et al.53 showed that the insufatorexsufator in conjunction with traditional chest physiotherapy therapy (CPT )may improve the management of airway secretions. Manual Rib Cage Compression. Manual rib cage compression (MRCC), or tussive squeezes as some may call them, can be used to increase the expiratory ow rate and facilitate the expectoration of mucus. Although most studies have not shown a benet,54-57 a recent publication has brought to light that the procedure may be to blame.58 In order for MRCC to be effect, the expiratory ow rates generated must be higher than inspiratory ow rates. Daniel Marti and colleagues58 were able to demonstrate in animals that hard and brief MRCC synchronized with early expiratory phase was superior to soft and gradual rib cage compression applied late in the expiratory phase. If the goal is to mimic a cough for those who cannot cough for themselves, it must be similar. Coughs are violent bursts of ow that exceed inspiratory ow rates and are
205
HUFF
FIGURE 12-7 Graphic illustration of the depth of successive breaths by lung volumes, using the autogenic drainage technique. ERV, expiratory reserve volume; HUFF, huff maneuver; PRED, predicted; RV, residual volume; TV, tidal volume.
extremely effective in the strong patient. The MRCC must be similar in order to be effective.
Autogenic Drainage
AD is a series of breathing exercises designed to mobilize secretions in patients with bronchiectasis or CF.59-61 To loosen secretions from the smallest airways, the patient begins breathing in a slow, controlled manner, rst at the expiratory reserve volume level. The volume of ventilation is then increased, with the patient breathing in the normal tidal volume range but exhaling approximately halfway into the expiratory reserve volume. This moves secretions from the peripheral to the middle airways. Finally, the depth of inspiration is increased, with the patient inhaling maximally to total lung capacity and exhaling as before about halfway into the expiratory reserve volume. Figure 12-7 graphically illustrates the autogenic drainage technique. Advocates of AD claim that its simplicity (no devices or clinicians are needed) and efcacy make it an ideal form of self-treatment for patients with CF.
FIGURE 12-8 Patient wearing an inatable vest during highfrequency chest compression therapy in the hospital. (Used with permission of Electromed, Inc.)
chest wall compression produces brief periods of high expiratory airow, which loosens and mobilizes mucus from bronchial walls.71 The device is widely used in patients with CF. HFCWC has also been evaluated in a long-term study. After a 22-month period of using HFCC as the sole form of ACT, patients experienced a small but signicant improvement in pulmonary function. In contrast, after a similar period on conventional manual ACT, pulmonary function declined somewhat.71 HFCWC does not require the patient to perform postural drainage (known to be
206
SECTION I Section Title loose from the airways, nor does chest wall vibration. Of the therapies that do workpostural drainage, PEP, AD, FET, and the HFCC systemall attempt to prevent or compensate for dynamic airway collapse. Postural drainage attempts to move mucus passively, by force of gravity, past the damaged, collapsible portions of the airways and toward less diseased, more rigid central airways. The remaining therapies attempt to prevent dynamic airway collapse while at the same time producing high expiratory air velocity at low lung volumes. This develops the shearing forces required to mobilize sputum.4 A novel explanation for the efcacy of simple postural drainage is suggested by Lannefors and Wollmer,74 who demonstrated improved mucous clearance in the dependent lung of patients undergoing postural drainage. For most patients, lung volumes and airway diameter are reduced in the dependent lung but ventilation is increased. These factors result in increased air movement at high velocity, which increases turbulence and shearing in small airways and results in greater mobilization of mucus. Deep breathing associated with vigorous exercise has also been shown to be an effective technique for mobilization of secretions in patients with CF.75,76 To accommodate the increased ventilatory demands of exercise, rate and depth of breathing are increased and active exhalation may occur. Hence, vigorous exercise produces a ventilatory pattern that, like AD or FET, increases air velocity at low lung volumes and promotes sputum mobilization. Take a deep breath and youll feel better. This is a sound piece of advice that was given long before the advent of incentive spirometry or IPPB. Taking a deep breath to total lung capacity, either by sighing or yawning, is a normal, unconscious maneuver performed periodically to keep the lungs inated and to avoid ventilationperfusion mismatch.77 When the breathing pattern becomes one of tidal ventilation without periodic maximal ination, atelectasis ensues within a few hours.78 Variations in the normal pattern of breathing may result in respiratory complications and an increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality. Changes in the breathing patterns of pediatric patients are most often caused by increased sedation, narcotics, pain, uid overload, parenchymal lung damage, fear and anxiety, and abdominal or thoracic surgery. It has been estimated that 10% to 40% and even as many as 70% of patients undergoing abdominal or thoracic surgery experience postoperative pulmonary complications,79,80 consisting of atelectasis, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, and hypoxemia. These conditions are believed to be caused by reduced diaphragmatic movement (especially after upper abdominal surgery), changes in chest wall muscle tone, and secretion retention, all of which result in decreased lung volumes.81 The modalities and methods used to increase a childs lung volume can be classied as (1) voluntary, using the patients own effort and initiative to sustain a deep breath (incentive spirometry); and (2) applied, providing
effective for sputum mobilization) and incorporates rapid percussion (generally demonstrated to be ineffective). What accounts for this seeming paradox? HFCC compresses the chest at frequencies up to 22 Hz, which is much higher than can be generated by manual percussion (5-8 Hz). Furthermore, compression is usually applied only on exhalation. In the initial studies with HFCWC, the developers of this device measured expiratory volumes and ows and selected the frequencies that resulted in the highest values for these variables. High expiratory airow is maintained with HFCC, even at low lung volumes. The result is multiple, brief periods of high expiratory air ow (or more precisely air velocity), similar to huff coughing or FET.72 High expiratory air velocity at low lung volumes produces the greatest airmucus interaction and hence mucus mobilization. HFCWC does not directly dislodge mucus from the bronchial wall, as conventional percussion is thought to do, but instead simulates multiple coughs or FETs by generating high expiratory air velocities. Because the compressive phase of HFCC is brief (as short as 0.02 second at a frequency of 22 Hz) and the glottis remains open during therapy, it is unlikely that dynamic airway collapse occurs, as happens with natural coughing in patients with bronchiectasis or CF. Manual percussion bears little resemblance to HFCWC. In contrast to HFCWC, manual percussion is rarely, if ever, adjusted to produce optimal expiratory airow to simulate cough or FET. In addition, it is given during inspiration as well as expiration, which may limit the deep breathing that is essential for producing high expiratory air velocities. Finally, manual percussion is applied only to a small portion of the chest wall at one time, which may be insufcient to generate adequate expiratory ows.
Effectiveness of Techniques
Proponents of conventional ACT techniques often describe the problem that ACT aims to treat as abnormal (excessive, thick, tenacious) secretions. Although this is partially correct, therapies that would seem to attack this problem directly have proved disappointing. Manual, lowfrequency chest percussion does not seem to jar mucus
CHAPTER 12 Airway Clearance Techniques and Hyperination Therapy the patient with a positive-pressuregenerated breath to achieve an increase in lung volume (IPPB). In this chapter these methods of lung volume expansion therapy are discussed as they relate to the pediatric patient.
207
changes may be warranted. Positional changes during ACT may also result in hypotension or hypertension.
Percussion
Several studies report that chest percussion, rather than postural changes, is responsible for ACT-associated hypoxemia.35,82-84 These studies suggest that chest percussion causes signicant abnormalities, and unless counterbalanced by removal of a substantial quantity of mucus and improvement in ratios, the net change will be a deterioration in relationships and hypoxemia.
Atelectasis
Both human and animal studies have shown an increase in atelectasis when ACT was given.81,92 Vigorous chest percussion has been noted to produce pressure swings in the chest of up to 30 cm H2O. Such pressures generated by intermittent compression or percussion of the chest wall would seem sufcient to expel appreciable quantities of air from the lung, especially if chest wall compliance is high. Chest wall vibration, in contrast to percussion, has been associated with hypoxemia in some studies.34-36,93,94 This reects the fact that vibration may or may not be associated with chest wall compression, depending on the techniques or equipment used, whereas chest percussion invariably causes chest wall compression.
Hypoxemia
The most commonly cited adverse effect of ACT is hypoxemia. Several studies have reported hypoxemia in infants receiving ACT.33-36 Hypoxemia has also been documented in studies of adolescent and adult patients receiving ACT and was reported to occur more often in patients with preexisting cardiovascular complications, with minimal sputum production, and when mucoid rather than mucopurulent secretions were present. It occurred in patients with good pulmonary function and also when supplemental oxygen was being used.82-87 Tachypnea and tachycardia may occur in patients who experience hypoxemia during ACT. There may be a variety of reasons why ACT often causes hypoxemia. Among the proposed mechanisms are ventilationperfusion abnormalities caused by postural changes, atelectasis, bronchospasm, alterations in cardiac output and oxygen consumption, and incomplete expectoration of mobilized secretions. In addition, each of the ACT techniques may contribute to hypoxemia to differing degrees.
Bronchospasm
An additional explanation for the association of chest percussion with hypoxemia is the observation that chest percussion can cause bronchospasm in susceptible patients, especially when sputum production is minimal. Administering bronchodilators before therapy may be desirable, especially when ACT is applied in patients with reactive airway disease.
Position
Most studies of the effects of posture on oxygenation in adults would suggest that putting the diseased portion of the lung uppermost, as in postural drainage therapy, improves oxygenation.88-90 This is a consequence of improved perfusion of the healthy, dependent lung tissue at the expense of the diseased, elevated lung segments. Thus, at least for patients with localized, unilateral lung disease, abnormalities secondary to postural changes are an unlikely explanation for ACT-associated hypoxemia in patients outside of infancy. Infants, however, have better oxygenation when the affected side is dependent (i.e., the good lung is up).91 This may in part be the result of higher baseline pulmonary artery pressures, which would mitigate the effects of gravity on pulmonary blood ow. Hence, alterations in relationships as a direct result of postural changes are a possible explanation for CPT-associated hypoxemia in infants. Patients with generalized lung disease may respond differently to postural changes, however, and careful monitoring of oxygenation with position
Gastroesophageal Reux
Gastroesophageal reux (GER) is a common cause of respiratory problems in infants and children, and ACT is often ordered for patients who have GER. One study found that in patients with GER, ACT resulted in a vefold increase in reux episodes compared with periods when ACT was not given.97 This increase in GER was seen even though treatments were withheld up to 3.5 hours after the infants last feeding. The study did not link the increase in reux episodes to any particular aspect of ACT, such as head-down positioning. GER may cause severe esophagitis, bronchospasm, or pneumonia and has been linked to apnea and sudden infant death syndrome.98 Therefore ACT should be
208
SECTION I Section Title in place can be accidentally extubated during ACT, especially if they are being mechanically ventilated. The ventilator tubing or endotracheal tube, or both, are easily pulled during position changes, and extubation may result. When turning the patient, condensation in the ventilator tubing can be inadvertently drained into the patients airway, which may result in bronchospasm and respiratory distress. Special attention should also be given to patients who receive ACT during the rst 24 hours after a tracheostomy because hemorrhage may occur if therapy is given too vigorously.32 Therefore, for patients in intensive care units or those with articial airways in place, suction equipment as well as a manual resuscitator and mask should be readily available, preferably at the patients bedside.
given only when the benets of treatment clearly outweigh the risks of aggravated GER. Although withholding treatment as long as possible after an infants feeding is advisable, it clearly will not eliminate the risks involved.
Intracranial Complications
Studies in preterm infants have reported that certain positions of the infants head may increase intracranial pressure and that routine application of ACT, especially in the rst few days of life, can signicantly increase the risk of IVH.37,100 ACT procedures in the child or adult with a recent head injury can also increase intracranial pressure.101 Because of these concerns, many institutions do not place premature infants or patients with head injuries in the Trendelenburg position during ACT.
Asthma
In studies of the effects of ACT in children hospitalized with severe exacerbation of asthma, no difference was found in the rate of improvement of pulmonary function, even in the most severe cases.89 Other studies in adults with reactive airway disease have shown that chest percussion can cause bronchospasm and hypoxemia.84,103,104 Selected patients with asthma may benet from ACT, especially when copious secretions or obstructive atelectasis are present. However, bronchospasm and hypoxemia should be well controlled before treatment. ACT is no substitute for adequate treatment with bronchodilating agents. It is also essential that a patient with asthma be well hydrated before ACT is begun.
Bronchiolitis
Although bronchiolitis is characterized by increased secretions, studies have reported ACT to be of minimal value. CPT made no difference in the length of hospital stay or the severity or duration of symptoms in patients with bronchiolitis, even when associated pneumonia or atelectasis was present.105 It also produced no benecial changes in lung mechanics or work of breathing in patients with bronchiolitis.106 The failure of CPT to produce an effect in
Airway Trauma
In all patients, extreme care must be taken to maintain a proper airway. Infants and children with articial airways
CHAPTER 12 Airway Clearance Techniques and Hyperination Therapy bronchiolitis most likely results from the fact that the disease affects the smaller, peripheral airways, where ACT techniques are generally not effective.8
209
Cystic Fibrosis
ACT has been widely employed as a mainstay of treatment for the pulmonary complications of CF. In fact, much of our knowledge of ACT comes from studies conducted in patients with CF.47,111,113 Current issues in the application of ACT in these patients include the following questions: 1. Which techniques are most effective? 2. How can self-care be promoted? 3. How can compliance with therapy be improved? Effective techniques are those that foster high expiratory air velocity at low lung volume, such as FET, PEP therapy, HFCC, vigorous exercise, and AD. Postural drainage is also a useful adjunct to PEP therapy or FET. Although little evidence is available to support the routine use of manual chest percussion in the treatment of CF, and although some CF centers (especially in Europe) have abandoned the routine use of manual chest percussion, most CF treatment centers in the United States still consider it an integral component of ACT. Many patients will expect percussion to be a part of their ACT treatments, especially when hospitalized. Therefore elimination of chest percussion from routine ACT treatments should not be carried out arbitrarily. Radical changes in ACT practice for patients facing a lifelong battle with excessive pulmonary secretions should be made only after careful deliberation and consultation with the pulmonary physicians responsible for their care. The issue of promoting self-care is especially important when dealing with patients with CF and their families. Patients with CF differ from most patients receiving ACT in that they need to employ some technique or techniques for removal of bronchial secretions on a daily basis for the rest of their lives. Current practices, especially those that require the routine application of chest percussion by a second person, often give the message that ACT is a passive technique, that it is something that is done to rather than by the patient. This may promote passivity and dependence on parents or other caregivers. As a result, compliance is often poor and treatments become a frequent source of arguments in families of patients with CF, with difculties increasing as the patients grow older.46,114 Also, because ACT must be administered by a parent two or more times a day, it may interfere with normal adolescent developmental processes, such as increasing autonomy and separation from parents. Therefore increasing the patients ability to perform self-care is essential. All patients with CF, especially as they approach adolescence, should be well instructed in one of the forms of self-care, such as PEP, AD, FET with or without postural drainage, or HFCC. Vigorous exercise, such as running or swimming, is also an effective form of self-therapy in well-motivated patients. The techniques selected will depend on patient preference and learning ability, the preferences of the attending physician, and, in the case of certain technologies, the ability to arrange nancing. Patients and their families often report improved compliance with self-care over
Pneumonia
Several studies have evaluated the role of CPT in pneumonia and have reported that CPT either had no effect or actually delayed resolution, especially in young adults.105,107, 109
Postsurgical Patients
In a study of a group of closely matched pediatric cardiac surgery patients, Reines and colleagues108 reported that those treated with ACT had twice the incidence of atelectasis as did the control group (68% vs. 32%), which received deep-breathing instruction, coughing, or suction as appropriate. Moreover, atelectasis was more severe and the duration of hospitalization was prolonged in the ACT group. Percussion to the right upper lobe every 1 to 2 hours for 24 hours after extubation is a common practice in many neonatal intensive care units. This practice is based on a report by Finer and associates109 that claimed a dramatic reduction in the risk of right upper lobe atelectasis after extubation when ACT was given. However, it is unclear from the study if suctioning alone or ACT was responsible for the results.
210
Evaluate Indications: Difficulty with secretion clearance with sputum production Evidence of retained secretions Mucus plug induced atelectasis Diagnosis of cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis, or cavitating lung disease
Yes
No
No
Yes
Select method based on: Patient preference/comfort/pain avoidance Observation of effectiveness History with documented effectiveness Methods may include: Manual chest percussion, vibration and positioning High frequency chest wall oscillation Intrapulmonary percussion Oscillatory PEP
Select method based on: Patient preference/comfort/pain avoidance Observation of effectiveness History with documented effectiveness Methods may include: Cough assist Intrapulmonary percussion CPAP/IPPB
Administer therapy no less than QID and PRN, supplemented by suctioning for all patients with artificial airways
Assess outcomes: goals achieved? Optional hydration and decreased sputum production Breath sounds that progress from diminished to adventitious with rhonchi cleared by cough Patient subjective impression of less retention and improved clearance Resolution/improvement in chest X-ray Improvement in vital signs and measures of gas exchange If on ventilator, reduced resistance and improved compliance
Care plan considerations: Discontinue therapy if improvement is observed and sustained over a 24-hour period Patients with chronic pulmonary disease who maintain secretion clearance in their home environment should remain on treatment no less than their home frequency Hyperinflation therapy should be considered for patients who are at high risk for pulmonary complications
parent-administered ACT, and treatment-related conicts are minimized.46 Follow-up and consistency are essential when teaching bronchial drainage techniques. Reteaching may be necessary at intervals, and most patients with CF and their families are interested in learning new developments
in ACT. Families often need assistance in adapting ACT practices to changing life circumstances, such as the patient entering school, traveling, entering college, and leaving home. Figure 12-8 demonstrates the use of HFCC while the child continues daily activities of life. Having a younger child play a game or continue
CHAPTER 12 Airway Clearance Techniques and Hyperination Therapy some type of fun activity can be vitally important to ensure compliance. Patients with advanced CF often have hemoptysis. ACT is usually withheld until the bleeding is controlled because vigorous coughing may aggravate the bleeding or dislodge clots. Likewise, ACT may need to be withheld in patients with pneumothorax, another common complication of advanced CF. Patients with end-stage disease may be especially reluctant to cooperate with ACT, especially the Trendelenburg positioning that is required. Supplemental oxygen may allow some patients with advanced disease to tolerate postural drainage. Withholding percussion may also improve the patients ability to maintain the Trendelenburg position. Some investigators have reported that PEP therapy is better tolerated than postural drainage and percussion in patients with end-stage disease.50
211
Probable Neuromuscular disease hyperinflation therapy (Cough Assist, IPV) Atelectasis during mechanical ventilation IPV
Minimal to no benefit Asthma Bronchiolitis Neonatal RDS Acute resp. failure Post-op atelectasis
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Frank hemoptysis, empyema, foreign body aspiration, and untreated pneumothorax are often considered contraindications to all components of ACT. Withholding ACT, especially percussion, is sometimes recommended when the platelet count is low (less than 50,000 cells/mm3). ACT is also usually withheld in the immediate postoperative period after tracheostomy, tracheobronchial reconstruction, and selected other conditions in which postoperative movement is extremely dangerous. Chest percussion should not be performed directly over fractured ribs, areas of subcutaneous emphysema, or recently burned or grafted skin. Some conditions may require modication of therapy or omission of certain components of ACT.
Lung Abscess
Some patients with lung abscesses, especially older children, may be successfully treated with ACT.118 Fearing that discharge of large amounts of infected material may spread the infection and lead to acute respiratory distress, some clinicians are reluctant to use ACT in the treatment of lung abscess.27 Likewise, hemoptysis is a common complication in patients with lung abscess, and ACT may increase this risk. These concerns must be balanced against the knowledge that alternative treatments for lung abscess, such as lung resections, are also risky. Though there is not enough evidence to denitively evaluate the role of ACT in many acute childhood diseases, it has become routine care for the CF patient. ACT appears likely to be of benet in the maintenance or prevention of respiratory-related neuromuscular disease complications and is probably of benet in treating atelectasis in mechanically ventilated children. ACT appears to be of minimal to no benet in the treatment of acute asthma, bronchiolitis, neonatal respiratory distress, or those requiring mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure, and it is not effective in preventing atelectasis in the immediate postoperative period. Caution should be used given that the conclusions are based on very limited data (Figure 12-10).
CLINICAL HIGHLIGHT
Regardless of your approach, standardization supported by clinical practice guidelines or protocols may be of assistance. Figure 12-11 is an example of a protocol used to guide therapy.
212
SECTION I Section Title this technique results in increased expiratory air velocity at low lung volumes, improving mucus mobilization.
THERAPY MODIFICATION
Many patients require modication of therapy because of medical or surgical procedures. Percussion may be extremely painful for patients postoperatively, and the use of manual vibration or mechanical vibrators is sometimes better tolerated. Also, clinicians should be careful to avoid percussion over implanted devices, such as ventricular peritoneal shunts or implantable venous access devices (often used in patients with CF). Percussion is also omitted in patients with brittle bonesfor example, in those with rickets or osteogenesis imperfecta. Many patients may not tolerate Trendelenburg positioning. Included in this group are those with severe GER, recent intracranial trauma or surgery, increased intracranial pressure, abdominal distention or ascites, compromised diaphragm movement, uncontrolled hypertension, and severe cardiopulmonary failure.120 With careful monitoring, simple side-to-side positioning may be attempted in these patients. The patient with a gastrostomy tube or chest tube, or both, may also require modications in drainage positions. Patients receiving ACT often have a disorder affecting only one lobe. These patients do not need ACT in all 11 positions but rather an abbreviated ACT treatment that uses postural drainage positions for the affected lobe only. Infants and small children are unable to perform maneuvers such as FET or AD. Some clinicians have attempted to mimic these techniques with gentle chest wall compression during the expiratory phase, allowing the child to exhale to less than functional residual capacity. Like AD or FET performed in cooperative older patients,
EVALUATION OF THERAPY
Because the goal of ACT is to promote the removal of excessive bronchial secretions, the single most important variable in evaluating the effectiveness of ACT is the amount of secretions expectorated with therapy; however, this cannot be done in a vacuum and the basics should not be forgotten. The hydration status of the patient, and whether or not the patients lungs are acidic, can play a huge role in the success of airway clearance.121,122 Mucus changes from sol to gel if the lungs are acidic. Changes in sputum production, breath sounds, vital signs, chest radiographic ndings, blood gas values, and lung mechanics may indicate a positive response to the therapy.120 The removal of excessive bronchial secretions is not always associated with an immediate change in blood gases, breath sounds, or lung mechanics. Patients with advanced CF, for example, almost always have audible rales before and after therapy, whereas pulmonary function and blood gas determinations change little. Patients undergoing mechanical ventilation may have measurements of lung mechanics as well as noninvasive blood gas monitoring data readily available. If so, the clinician should note any changes associated with therapy. Deterioration in these variables, especially if unaccompanied by removal of secretions, suggests that therapy should be modied or discontinued.
213
DOCUMENTATION OF THERAPY
When charting ACT treatments, the clinician should describe the techniques used (e.g., postural drainage, percussion, and AD), which lobes were treated, and what positions the patient was placed in. If certain segments or positions are omitted, this should be documented, as well as the reason why this was done. The clinician should also note if suctioning was performed. To document the response to therapy, pretreatment and posttreatment breath sounds, vital signs, and the amount and quality of sputum expectorated should be noted.
HYPERINFLATION THERAPY
Incentive Spirometry
Incentive spirometry, also referred to as sustained maximal inspiration, was introduced in the early 1970s in an effort to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications.92,123 It was designed to encourage patients to improve their inspiratory volumes while visualizing their inspiratory effort. Forced expiratory maneuvers using devices such as blow bottles, blow gloves, and balloons have been prescribed in the past to prevent postoperative complications; however, they have been associated with the development of atelectasis and do not result in the same physiological effects as incentive spirometry.124-126 Although it is still debated which methods are most effective for the prevention and management of postoperative pulmonary complications, it is estimated that incentive spirometry is prescribed in 95% of all U.S. hospitals for prophylaxis and treatment of postoperative atelectasis.127-131 The objectives of incentive spirometry are to prevent or reverse atelectasis, improve lung volumes, and improve inspiratory muscle performance (including use of the diaphragm).124
and understand the procedure and to be able to breathe volumes exceeding his or her normal tidal volume. Incentive spirometry is contraindicated in patients who cannot cooperate or follow instructions concerning the proper use of the device. The child may be uncooperative, physically disabled, or simply too young to effectively perform the maneuvers. Alternative methods such as walking, getting up in a chair, frequent changes in position, and singing, to name a few, may help to improve lung volumes and should then be considered.132,133 The majority of problems that patients experience with incentive spirometry are the result of inadequate supervision or instruction, or both. These two factors account for a large number of ineffective treatments.134 Hyperventilation may occur in the patient who performs the maneuvers too rapidly, and he or she may complain of lightheadedness or tingling in the ngers. The patient may also complain of fatigue during the procedure. These complaints can be alleviated by coaching the patient to slow down and rest between each maneuver. Pain from surgical incisions is often encountered postoperatively and can be decreased by splinting the surgical area with a pillow during deep breathing and coughing. Airway closure and bronchospasm may occur if the patient exhales forcefully to less than functional residual capacity before taking a deep inspiration. Again, this can be avoided with proper coaching by the clinician. Hypoxia may develop if the patients oxygen therapy is interrupted, especially when a mask is used. This can be prevented by using a nasal cannula during therapy.
Devices
The original Bartlett-Edwards incentive spirometer operated on a pistonbellows principle and was designed to fall open by gravity at a preset volume. A battery-operated light was activated when the patient inhaled from the spirometer and the preset volume was reached. To keep the light on, the patient had to continue to inhale. The light went off when the patients glottis closed or total lung capacity was reached.135 There are many different types and brands of incentive spirometers, including disposable and nondisposable devices. They are classied according to how inhalation is activated: (1) volume oriented or (2) ow oriented. Most of the current volume-oriented incentive spirometers are based on the original Bartlett-Edwards spirometer. A volume is preset as a goal, and the patient is instructed to inhale until the preset goal is reached. The spirometer volume is measured according to the amount of volume displaced during the inhalation. Flow-oriented spirometers operate by using a oating ball or bar that is raised by the negative ow generated with inspiration. The more rapid and forceful the inspiratory ow, the higher the ball rises. Although differences in the inspiratory work of breathing among the various incentive spirometers have been reported, in terms of clinical outcome the differences
Box 12-1
Abdominal surgery Thoracic surgery Surgery in patients with pulmonary disease Atelectasis Restrictive lung defects associated with quadriplegia Restrictive lung defects associated with a dysfunctional diaphragm
214
SECTION I Section Title that incentive spirometry is as effective in reducing the incidence of atelectasis in children who have undergone cardiac surgery.143
among the devices appear to be negligible.136,137 The device used will vary from one institution to another and may even vary among patients within the institution. Regardless of the type, the operators instructions should be read and universal precautions followed.138 The number of maneuvers to be performed per session should be either prescribed by the physician or set by departmental policy. Several sources have suggested 5 to 10 effective breaths per treatment as an adequate frequency.124 The patient should cough during the session whenever it is felt necessary and then again when the maneuvers have been completed. The postoperative patient may need assistance with splinting of the incision during coughing as well as during deep breathing. A pillow or folded blanket can be placed over the incision area. The inspiratory volume goal may be increased when the patient reaches the preset goal repeatedly. Breath sounds should be assessed after coughing, and the incentive spirometer should be left within the patients reach before the clinician leaves the room. The patient should be encouraged to perform the maneuvers independently between scheduled sessions. The frequency of sessions varies with the patient and may be prescribed as often and specically as once per hour or as variably as three times per day.21,22
Assessment of Therapy
Documentation of the patients response during therapy should include the following: Heart rate Respiratory rate Breath sounds Inspiratory volume or ow achieved Number of goals achieved Description of cough and sputum production Patient effort and tolerance How many maneuvers the family has tried/agreed to get the patient to do per hour Any patient complaints or adverse reactions, or both, and the corrective action taken Therapy is considered effective if atelectasis is prevented or resolved and inspiratory muscle performance is improved.124 Clinical signs of this would include a decreased respiratory rate, normal temperature, normal pulse rate, normal or improved breath sounds that were previously absent or diminished, a normal chest radiograph, improved oxygenation, and increased vital capacity and peak expiratory ows.124 Although there have been numerous studies evaluating the therapeutic value of incentive spirometry, it is difcult to compare them because of the variation in patients and study design.139 However, a number of studies have indicated that incentive spirometry, along with other deep breathing maneuvers, is effective in reducing pulmonary complications when used correctly.129,131,140-142 A study comparing the efcacy of postoperative incentive spirometry between children and adults concluded
FIGURE 12-12 Intermittent positive-pressure breathing (IPPB) therapy being administered to a child, with a respirometer attached to the exhalation valve for exhaled volume monitoring.
CHAPTER 12 Airway Clearance Techniques and Hyperination Therapy and children.150 It is indicated most often in the older patient who needs increased lung expansion but has failed to respond to other modes of treatment, such as incentive spirometry, chest physiotherapy, deep-breathing exercises, and bilevel positive airway pressure. This includes patients with neuromuscular disease or chest wall deformity that inhibits maximal inspiratory efforts. Medication can also be delivered via IPPB to these patients. However, studies have continued to report that the delivery of medications via IPPB depends on the technique and that the rst mode of choice for aerosolized medication therapy should be a small-volume nebulizer or metered-dose inhaler.151-153 The absolute contraindication to IPPB is a tension pneumothorax; however, there are other factors that should be considered carefully before IPPB therapy is recommended. Because the effectiveness of applying IPPB therapy hinges on the cooperation of the patient, any infant or child who most likely would not cooperate and who has difculty coordinating deep breathing should not be considered for this therapy. (Asynchronous breathing as well as breathing against the high positive pressure could result in increased work of breathing.) According to the American Association for Respiratory Cares clinical practice guideline for IPPB, other clinical contraindications include increased intracranial pressures (greater than 15 mm Hg); recent facial, oral, or skull surgery; tracheoesophageal stula; recent esophageal surgery; active hemoptysis; active, untreated tuberculosis; radiographic evidence of blebs; hemodynamic instability; nausea; and swallowing of air.144 Because IPPB is so rarely used in pediatrics, it is possible that the clinician may be inexperienced in administering the therapy and unable to provide optimal respiratory care. When this situation arises, the objective of providing a safe, effective treatment may be unattainable, and it is in the patients best interest not to have the treatment administered. Complications associated with IPPB therapy are listed in Box 12-2.144,154,155 This list demonstrates the need for an
215
experienced clinician to administer the therapy and to monitor the patient and the equipment closely. Should adverse reactions occur, the treatment should be discontinued and the physician notied of the situation.
Equipment
The equipment used during an IPPB treatment includes the IPPB device, the circuit, the patient application device, and the volume measuring device. Although the addition of a humidier is not essential, it is recommended in patients with mucus retention. The most popular IPPB devices used in pediatric patients are the Bird series (Cardinal Health, Dublin, Ohio), the Puritan Bennett series (Puritan Bennett, Boulder, Colo), and the Monaghan 515 (Monaghan Medical, Plattsburgh, NY). The devices vary in design and in ow, volume, and pressure capabilities.156 The patient application devices are dependent on the patients needs and include a mouthpiece, lipmouth seal, mask, or endotracheal tube/tracheostomy adapter. A nose clip should be available for the patient who uses either a mouthpiece or lip seal. The volume measuring can be obtain by a spirometer. Suctioning equipment should be available, as should containers for collecting or disposing of sputum.144
Monitoring
The patient and equipment should be monitored closely during therapy. The heart rate and respiratory rate should be obtained before, during, and after each treatment. Breath sounds should be assessed before and after each treatment and any time the patient complains of respiratory difculty or chest pains. With the goal of therapy being to generate a tidal volume during IPPB that is at least 15 ml/kg or to exceed one third of inspiratory capacity, it is essential that tidal volume be monitored.157 To determine whether lung volume is being augmented, the patients tidal volume should be monitored before (spontaneous breathing) and several times during therapy. The exhaled gas is measured during therapy at the exhalation valve with either a respirometer or spirometer. If the tidal volume delivered during IPPB therapy is not greater than that during spontaneous breathing, the therapy is of little, if any, value to the patient. The patients peak ow should also be monitored before and after treatment.
Box 12-2
Bronchospasm Gastric distention and ileus Nosocomial infection Decreased venous return Hyperventilation Hypoventilation Impaction of secretions Fatigue Air trapping Volutrauma, pneumothorax Hemoptysis
Assessment of Therapy
Document the following with each IPPB treatment: Heart rate Respiratory rate Breath sounds Pressure used (beginning and end of therapy) Tidal volume obtained (before and during therapy) Machine controls used (i.e., sensitivity, ow) Fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) values Medication aerosolized Peak ow
216
SECTION I Section Title patients or may be set to continuous percussion for use in intubated patients. IPV may be applied via mouthpiece, mask, articial airway, or through a ventilator. If you take a least aggressive to most aggressive approach, the primary indication for a combination therapy like IPV is a patient refractory to traditional bronchial hygiene methods. Other indications are similar to other airway clearance procedures, such as patients with atelectasis, bronchitis, bronchiectasis, and bronchopneumonia. Patient who have aggressive secretion-producing disease coupled with muscle weakness are likely the best candidates. Contraindications are not that different than positive pressure and airway clearance and include untreated pneumothorax, hemoptysis, active tuberculosis, and fractured ribs or unstable chest
Description of cough and sputum production Patient cooperation and tolerance Duration of therapy Any patient complaints or adverse reactions and the corrective action taken IPPB therapy is believed to be effective if the therapeutic goals are met, including the following: An augmented tidal volume during IPPB (15 ml/kg or more than one third of the inspiratory capacity) An increase in peak ow or forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) A more effective cough Secretion clearance Improved breath sounds An improved chest radiograph144 When compared with other aerosol delivery devices, IPPB in the pediatric patient is both equipment and labor intensive.104 With this in mind, perhaps thought should be given not to whether IPPB is effective in delivering aerosols but rather to whether IPPB is the most effective method of delivery.119 However, although there are other less expensive and less invasive lung expansion maneuvers, there remain patients who fail to respond to these maneuvers but who do benet from IPPB. If there are no observable benets from the therapy, however, its use cannot be justied.
Monitoring
The patient and equipment should be monitored closely during therapy. The heart rate and respiratory rate should be obtained before, during, and after each treatment. Breath sounds should be assessed before and after each treatment and any time the patient complains of respiratory difculty or chest pains, with the goal of therapy being to clear secretion and improve the efciency of breathing.
Assessment of Therapy
Document the following with each IPV treatment: Heart rate Respiratory rate Breath sounds Pressure used (beginning and end of therapy) Machine controls used Medication aerosolized Peak ow (if applicable) Description of sputum production Patient cooperation and tolerance Duration of therapy Any patient complaints or adverse reactions and the corrective action taken IPV therapy is believed to be effective if the therapeutic goals are met, including the following: Secretion clearance Improved breath sounds Improved gas exchange Medication delivery An improved chest radiograph158
CLINICAL HIGHLIGHT
Hyperination therapy maybe the only airway clearance a patient needs.
217
CASE STU D Y
You are assigned to treat a 10 year old with CF who is struggling with secretion management. You are requested by the physician to assess and treat the patient with what you feel is the most appropriate ACT. After further assessment, you determine that the patient is hypoxic, requiring a dry high-ow oxygen device; has inspissated secretions and adventitious breath sounds; and is fatiguing. What should be your rst actions? 1. Provide humidity as soon as possible. 2. Determine the patients home regiment and what has worked in the past. 3. Consider an ACT with hyperination therapy to support fatiguing muscles. 4. Call physician to report fatigue. A. 4, 2, 1, 3 B. 4 only and wait for direction C. 1, 2, 3, 4 D. 2, 3
See Evolve Resources for answers.
KEY POINTS
The primary use of ACT should be limited to those who cannot clear their airway secretions. The most effective ACT is that which mimics or supports normal physiology. ACT should target symptoms. See the table here for a list of ACTs to best target various symptoms.
Symptom Weak or poor cough Possible cause Neuromuscular disease Initial ACT Combination ACT and hyperination therapy. Clinician choice as to which therapy creates the highest expiratory ow rate. This requires increasing the FRC. Wean sedation if possible and support with hyperination therapy. Support pain management and encourage deep breathing and coughing with mobilization if possible. Hydration and chest physical therapy. Solve external force issues if possible. PEP for obstructions that lead to atelectasis. CPT for those obstructed secretions that lead to distal hyperination. Treat infection or possible cause of sputum production and support with chest physical therapy.
Oversedation Pain
Inspissated secretions Airway collapse that leads to retained secretions Expectorating a large volume of secretions
All ACT should have an objective outcome to determine effectiveness and be reevaluated frequently.
ASSESSMENT QUESTIONS
See Evolve Resources for answers.
1. Many institutions found that the routine use of IPPB was replaced with routine use of ACT in what two decades? A. 1900s and 1910s B. 1920s and 1930s C. 1960s and 1970s D. 1980s and 1990s
2. Postural drainage was used as early as: A. 1901 B. 1911 C. 1940 D. 1953 3. When doing percussion therapy, what is the recommended frequency? A. 1 to 2 Hz B. 3 to 4 Hz C. 5 to 6 Hz D. 7 to 8 Hz
218
4. When providing vibration chest physiotherapy, what is the recommended frequency? A. 6 to 7 Hz B. 8 to 9 Hz C. 10 to 15 Hz D. 20 Hz 5. The four components of traditional159 ACT are: A. Postural drainage, percussion, vibration, and coughing B. FET, IS, IPPB, and HFFC C. PEP, position, AD, and resistance D. Hydration, percussion, deep breathing, and FET 6. Premature infants may be at risk for increased complications from ACT. Why? A. The high chest wall compliance of premature infants can cause loss of lung volume. B. ACT is associated with IVH. C. Prolonged handling can interfere with the temperature-regulated environment of these patients. D. A, B, and C are correct. 7. What hyperination therapy was introduced in the 1970s to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications? A. Deep breath and cough B. Incentive spirometry C. CPT D. PEP 8. ACT is required in only a limited number of conditions, all of which are characterized by which of the following? A. Chronic, excessive sputum production B. Disease state C. Patient age and disease state D. None of the above 9. Treatments for patients with CF or bronchiectasis should be performed for at least ________ and reevaluated every ______ for acute care. A. 10 minutes, 24 hours B. 15 minutes, 48 hours C. 20 minutes, 96 hours D. 30 minutes, 72 hours 10. What are the contraindications for ACT? A. Frank hemoptysis B. Empyema C. Foreign body aspiration D. All of the above
R e f e renc es
1. Ewart W: The treatment of bronchiectasis and of chronic bronchial affections by posture and respiratory exercises, Lancet 2:70, 1901. 2. Gaskell DV, Webber BA: The Brompton Hospital guide to chest physiotherapy, Oxford, 1973, Blackwell Scientic Publications. 3. Murray JF: The ketchup-bottle method, N Engl J Med 300:1155, 1979. 4. Sutton PP, et al: Chest physiotherapy: a review, Eur J Respir Dis 63:188, 1982.
219
31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52.
53.
54. Unoki T, Kawasaki Y, Mizutani T, et al: Effects of expiratory rib-cage compression on oxygenation, ventilation, and airway-secretion removal in patients receiving mechanical ventilation, Respir Care 50(11):14301437, 2005. 55. Unoki T, Mizutani T, Toyooka H: Effects of expiratory rib cage compression and/or prone position on oxygenation and ventilation in mechanically ventilated rabbits with induced atelectasis, Respir Care 48(8):754762, 2003. 56. Unoki T, Mizutani T, Toyooka H: Effects of expiratory rib cage compression combined with endotracheal suctioning on gas exchange in mechanically ventilated rabbits with induced atelectasis, Respir Care 49(8):896901, 2004. 57. Marti JD, Li Bassi G, Rigol M, et al: Effects of manual rib cage compressions on expiratory ow and mucus clearance during mechanical ventilation, Crit Care Med 41(3):850856, 2013. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182711b52 58. Schoni MH: Autogenic drainage: a modern approach to physiotherapy in cystic brosis, J R Soc Med 82(16 suppl):32, 1989. 59. David: Autogenic drainagethe German approach. In Pryor JA, editor: International perspectives in physical therapy, vol 7, Edinburgh, 1991, Churchill Livingstone, pp 6578. 60. Davidson AGF, et al: Long-term comparison of conventional percussion and drainage physiotherapy versus autogenic drainage in cystic brosis [abstract], Pediatr Pulmonol 8(suppl): 298, 1992. 61. Falk M, et al: Improving the ketchup bottle method with positive expiratory pressure, PEP, in cystic brosis, Eur J Respir Dis 65:423, 1984. 62. Tonnesen P, Stovring S: Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) as lung physiotherapy in cystic brosis: a pilot study, Eur J Respir Dis 65:419, 1984. 63. Tyrell JC, Hiller EJ, Martin J: Face mask physiotherapy in cystic brosis, Arch Dis Child 61:598, 1986. 64. Oberwaldner B, Evans JC, Zach MS: Forced expirations against a variable resistance: a new chest physiotherapy method in cystic brosis, Pediatr Pulmonol 2:358, 1986. 65. Van Asperen PP, et al: Comparison of a positive expiratory pressure (PEP) mask with postural drainage in patients with cystic brosis, Aust Paediatr J 23:283, 1987. 66. Falk M, Andersen JB: Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) mask. In Pryor JA, editor: International perspectives in physical therapy, vol 7, Edinburgh, 1991, Churchill Livingstone, pp 5163. 67. Oberwaldner B, et al: Chest physiotherapy in hospitalized patients with cystic brosis: a study of lung function effects and sputum production, Eur Respir J 4:152, 1991. 68. Mortensen J, et al: The effects of postural drainage and positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy on tracheobronchial clearance in cystic brosis, Chest 100:1350, 1991. 69. Lindemann H, et al: Autogenic drainage: efcacy of a simplied method, Acta Univ Carol 36:210, 1990. 70. Warwick WJ, Hansen LG: The long-term efcacy of highfrequency chest compression on pulmonary complications of cystic brosis, Pediatr Pulmonol 11:265, 1991. 71. Warwick WJ: High frequency chest compression moves mucus by means of sustained staccato coughs [abstract], Pediatr Pulmonol 6(suppl):283, 1991. 72. Plioplys AV: Correspondence on safety, tolerability, and efcacy of high-frequency chest wall oscillation in pediatric patients with cerebral palsy and neuromuscular diseases: an exploratory randomized controlled trial. J Child Neurol 25(12):1598, 1991, author reply 1598. doi: 10.1177/0883073810384614 73. Lannefors L, Wollmer P: Mucus clearance with three chest physiotherapy regimes in cystic brosis: a comparison between postural drainage, PEP, and physical exercise, Eur Respir J 5:748, 1992. 74. Zach M, et al: Cystic brosis: physical exercise versus chest physiotherapy, Arch Dis Child 57:587, 1982.
220
75. Andreasson B, et al: Long-term effects of physical exercise on working capacity and pulmonary function in cystic brosis, Acta Paediatr Scand 76:70, 1987. 76. Bartlett RH, et al: Physiology of yawning and its application to postoperative care, Surg Forum 21:223, 1970. 77. Bartlett RH: Incentive spirometry. In Kacmarek R, Stoller J, editors: Current respiratory care: techniques and therapy, St. Louis, 1988, Mosby. 78. Bartlett RH: Post-traumatic pulmonary insufciency. In Cooper P, Nyhus L, editors: Surgery annual, New York, 1971, Appleton-Century-Crofts. 79. Ali J, et al: Consequences of postoperative alterations in respiratory mechanics, Am J Surg 128:376, 1974. 80. Meyers JR, et al: Changes in residual capacity of the lung after operation, Arch Surg 110:567, 1975. 81. McDonnell T, McNicholas WT, Fitzgerald MX: Hypoxaemia during chest physiotherapy in patients with cystic brosis, Ir J Med Sci 155:345, 1986. 82. Gormezano J, Branthwaite MA: Pulmonary physiotherapy with assisted ventilation, Anaesthesia 27:249, 1972. 83. Gormezano J, Branthwaite MA: Effects of physiotherapy during intermittent positive pressure ventilation, Anaesthesia 27:258, 1972. 84. Huseby J, et al: Oxygenation during chest physiotherapy [abstract], Chest 70:430, 1976. 85. Tyler ML, et al: Prediction of oxygenation during chest physiotherapy in critically ill patients [abstract], Am Rev Respir Dis 121:218, 1980. 86. Dhainaut JF, Bons J, Bricard C: Improved oxygenation in patients with extensive unilateral pneumonia using the lateral decubitus position, Thorax 35:792, 1980. 87. Emolina C, et al: Positional hypoxemia in unilateral lung disease, N Engl J Med 304:523, 1981. 88. Rivara: Positional hypoxemia during articial ventilation, Crit Care Med 12:436, 1984. 89. Heaf DP, et al: Postural effects on gas exchange in infants, N Engl J Med 308:1505, 1983. 90. Holody B, Goldberg HS: The effect of mechanical vibration physiotherapy on arterial oxygenation in acutely ill patients with atelectasis or pneumonia, Am Rev Respir Dis 124:372, 1981. 91. Mohsenifar Z, et al: Mechanical vibration and conventional chest physiotherapy in outpatients with stable chronic obstructive lung disease, Chest 87:463, 1985. 92. Weissman C, et al: Effect of routine intensive care interactions on metabolic rate, Chest 86:815, 1984. 93. Weissman C, Kemper M: The oxygen uptakeoxygen delivery relationship during ICU interventions, Chest 99:430, 1991. 94. Vandenplas Y, et al: Esophageal pH monitoring data during chest physiotherapy, J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 13:23, 1991. 95. Orenstein SR, Orenstein DM: Gastroesophageal reux and respiratory disease in children, J Pediatr 112:847, 1988. 96. Kosloske: Tracheobronchial foreign bodies in children: back to the bronchoscope and a balloon, Pediatrics 66:321, 1980. 97. Emery JR, Peabody JL: Head position affects intracranial pressure in newborn infants, J Pediatr 103:950, 1983. 98. Ersson U, et al: Observations on intracranial dynamics during respiratory physiotherapy in unconscious neurosurgical patients, Acta Anaesth Scand 343:99, 1990. 99. Purohit DM, Caldwell C, Levkoff AH: Multiple rib fractures due to physiotherapy in a neonate with hyaline membrane disease, Am J Dis Child 129:1103, 1975. 100. Asher MI, et al: Effects of chest physical therapy on lung function in children recovering from acute severe asthma, Pediatr Pulmonol 9:146, 1990.
221
142. Krastins, et al: An evaluation of incentive spirometry in the management of pulmonary complications after cardiac surgery in the pediatric population, Crit Care Med 10:525, 1982. 143. American Association for Respiratory Care: Clinical practice guideline: intermittent positive pressure breathing, Respir Care 48:540, 2003. 144. Motley HL, et al: Use of intermittent positive pressure breathing combined with nebulization in pulmonary disease, Am J Med 5:853, 1948. 145. Eubank DH, Bone RC: Intermittent positive pressure breathing. In Eubank DH, Bone RC, editors: Comprehensive respiratory care: a learning system module, St. Louis, 1985, Mosby, pp 430450. 146. Chang N, Levison H: The effect of nebulized bronchodilator administration with or without IPPB on ventilatory function in children with cystic brosis and asthma, Am Rev Respir Dis 106:867, 1972. 147. Baker JP: Magnitude of usage of intermittent positive pressure breathing, Am Rev Respir Dis 110:S170, 1974. 148. Handelsman H: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Health technology reports: intermittent positive pressure breathing (IPPB) therapy, AHCPR Pub. No. 92-0013. Rockville, Md, 1991, Ofce of Health Technology, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. 149. Burgess WR, Chernick V: Humidity and aerosol therapy. In Burger WR, Chernick V, editors: Respiratory therapy in newborn infants and children, New York, 1982, Thieme-Stratton, pp 7484. 150. Jasper AC, et al: Costbenet comparison of aerosol bronchodilator delivery methods in hospitalized patients, Chest 91:614, 1987. 151. Summer W, et al: Aerosol bronchodilator delivery methods: relative impact on pulmonary function and cost of respiratory care, Arch Intern Med 149:618, 1989. 152. American Association for Respiratory Care Clinical practice guideline: selection of a device for delivery of aerosol to the lung parenchyma, Respir Care 41:647, 1996. 153. Bierman CW: Pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax complicating asthma in children, Am J Dis Child 114:43, 1967. 154. Moore RB, Cotton EK, Dinnery MA: The effect of IPPB on airway resistance in normal and asthmatic children, J Allergy Clin Immunol 49:137, 1972. 155. McPherson SP: Respiratory therapy equipment, ed 7, St. Louis, 2004, Mosby. 156. Chatburn RL: High-frequency assisted airway clearance, Respir Care 52(9):12241235; discussion 12351227, 2007. 157. American Association for Respiratory Care: AARC clinical practice guideline. Postural drainage therapy, Respir Care 36(12):14181426, 1991.