How Business Drives It
How Business Drives It
How Business Drives It
I
n today’s complex and constantly changing business world, For the prioritisation and linking of the goals, a Delphi
the governance of information technology (IT) and the method was used. This method is based on a structured
alignment of IT to the business are high on the agenda of process for collecting and distilling knowledge from a group
executive management. Strategic planning based on the of experts by means of several feedback rounds. A team of
alignment of IT goals to business goals is a key component in experts was asked to prioritise a list of business and IT goals
business/IT alignment. It is important that an organisation by using a ranking technique, and the averaged results were
start with a clear view on its corporate mission and a returned to them. Different rounds were performed to achieve
thorough definition of its supporting strategy and business consensus amongst the experts on which were the important
goals. Then, these need to be translated into goals for the IT goals and how the business goals linked to the IT goals.
department, which are the basis for the IT strategy. Finally, The ISACA database was used as a major source for
the supporting IT processes must be carefully planned to identifying subject experts. In total, the participants were 158
translate the IT strategy into action. For these planning efforts, business and IT professionals (managers and auditors) from
companies may be looking for guidance to identify the set of companies in one of the sectors previously mentioned and
important business goals and IT goals and determine how with more than 150 employees. One of the assumptions was
they interrelate. that these experts have sufficient knowledge on both IT and
The IT Governance Institute (ITGI)’s research on this business goals. Figure 1 presents the expert team’s
subject was illustrated by a previous article1 in the Information composition by sector and geographic area.
Systems Control Journal and led to the publication of a set of
generally applicable business goals for IT and associated IT
goals in COBIT 4.0. Extensive follow-up research was Figure 1—Expert Team Composition
performed to gain more insight into this set of business and
IT goals and their linkage. This article presents the results of Expert Team per Sector
the follow-up research project in which experts in different
sectors were asked to validate, prioritise and link a set of
business goals and IT goals. This research resulted in a Retail Transportation: 16
significant improvement of the business goals for IT and Financial: 38
associated IT goals in COBIT 4.1.
Government, Utilities,
Research Background Healthcare: 39
This research project was based on the findings of a pilot Manufacturing,
study that resulted in a list of 20 generic business goals and Pharmaceutical: 25
28 generic IT goals, published in COBIT 4.0. The objective of
this research was to:
• Validate these lists for completeness, consistency and clarity IT Professional Service,
Telco, Media: 40
• Gain more insight into goals’ priorities for different sectors
• Examine the relationship between IT goals and business goals
In practice, every enterprise has its own distinct sets of Expert Team per Geography
business and IT goals. Priorities within these sets differ Australia: 7
depending on a variety of internal and external factors, such Asia: 28
as company size, market position, degree of IT dependency,
industry and geography. This project chose an industry North America: 51
approach and started with a pilot study in the financial sector
that was then replicated in the following four sectors: Africa: 14
• Manufacturing and pharmaceuticals
• IT professional services, telecommunications and media
• Government, utilities (energy, oil and gas) and healthcare Middle East: 18 Latin America: 3
• Retail and transportation
Europe: 37
I N F O R M AT I O N S Y S T E M S C O N T RO L J O U R NA L , VO L U M E 6 , 2 0 0 7 1
Findings speaking, the most important business goals and IT goals.
The following findings resulted from the study. Filtering the results per company size and geography
confirmed the stability of these top 10 lists of goals.
Identification of Business and IT Goals
The outcome of the exercise was an in-depth understanding Financial and Customer-oriented Goals2
of business goals and IT goals, and how they interrelate. Although priorities may differ from sector to sector, in
During the research, the original list of IT goals and business general, business goals categorised in the customer and
goals (published in COBIT 4.0) was reviewed multiple times financial perspective of the BSC score high in the ranked list,
and evolved to a generic list of 17 (IT-related) business goals whilst the internal and learning and growth perspective goals
and 18 IT goals. Overlaps, inconsistencies and ambiguities receive lower scores overall. As an example, the customer-
amongst the different goals were reduced to a minimum. The oriented business goals ‘improve customer orientation and
goals turned out to be generically defined and applicable service’ and ‘establish service continuity and availability’ and
across all sectors. Figure 2 presents the final list of business the financial-oriented business goals ‘comply with external
and IT goals, categorised by their corresponding balanced laws and regulations’ and ‘manage IT-related business risks’
scorecard (BSC) perspectives. The generically defined goals make up the top four in the generic list and are also
provide a guideline to help companies identify their set of systematically ranked high to very high in the individual lists
important business and IT goals. In practice, enterprises will by sector, geography and company size.
need to develop their own subset, but they can do this This trend is confirmed in the IT goals list. The IT goals for
efficiently by: the related IT BSC perspective’s corporate and user are higher
• Starting from these generic business and IT goals in the list than those for the learning and growth perspective.
• Updating them for enterprise specifics (strategy, For example, the corporate contribution-related goals ‘align the
infrastructure, etc.) IT strategy to the business strategy’ and ‘provide IT
• Adding measures to track goal achievement compliance with laws and regulations’ and the user-oriented
goals ‘make sure that IT services are reliable and secure’ and
Top 10 Business and IT Goals ‘provide service offerings and service levels in line with
Both lists of business and IT goals have been prioritised business requirements’ are systematically ranked high for the
over five different sectors. Figure 3 presents the top 10 most different sectors, geographies and company sizes.
important business and IT goals, consolidated over all sectors. It is remarkable that the future-oriented business goal for
Apart from some minor exceptions, the separate lists of the acquiring and maintaining the necessary skills only just makes
different sectors include the same business goals and IT goals it in the top 10 list of business goals (number 8), and that its IT
in their individual top 10 lists. This proves that there is a very counterpart goal, ‘acquire, develop and maintain IT skills that
high degree of consensus that these 10 goals are, generically respond to the IT strategy’, falls out of the top 10 most
important IT goals.
2 I N F O R M AT I O N S Y S T E M S C O N T RO L J O U R NA L , VO L U M E 6 , 2 0 0 7
Figure 3—Top 10 List of Business Goals and IT Goals
I N F O R M AT I O N S Y S T E M S C O N T RO L J O U R NA L , VO L U M E 6 , 2 0 0 7 3
Figure 4—Linking IT Goals to Business Goals
10. Obtain reliable and useful information for strategic decision making.
9. Create agility in responding to changing business requirements.
organisations. Enterprises can do that efficiently by starting impact, the associated goals are called ‘Corporate
from these generic business and IT goals, selecting what Contribution’ and ‘User Perspective’.
applies to them and updating it for enterprise-specific
situations. This will be a good starting point toward Wim Van Grembergen
implementing IT governance. is a professor in the information systems management
department of the University of Antwerp and an executive
Acknowledgements professor at the University of Antwerp Management School.
This research project was commissioned by ITGI and was He is also academic director of the ITAG Research Institute.
performed by the Information Technology Alignment and Van Grembergen has been involved in research and
Governance (ITAG) Research Institute of the University of development activities for several COBIT products.
Antwerp Management School (UAMS) in Belgium. ITGI also
provided the necessary contact information from the ISACA Steven De Haes
member database for building the expert team. The authors and is responsible for the information systems management
researchers are grateful for the valuable support of the COBIT executive programmes at the University of Antwerp
Steering Committee and would like to thank Erik Guldentops Management School. He is managing director of the ITAG
who initiated this research and provided many ideas on IT Research Institute and is currently finalising a Ph.D. in IT
governance. Thanks also go the expert team members for governance. De Haes has also been involved in research and
taking the time during several rounds to provide valuable development activities for several COBIT products.
answers and feedback on the questionnaires.
Hilde Van Brempt
Endnote is senior researcher for the ITAG Research Institute. She has
1
Van Grembergen W.; S. De Haes; J. Moons; ‘IT Governance: many years of experience in large organisations and is now
Linking Business Goals to IT Goals and COBIT Processes’, involved in organising and executing international research
Information Systems Control Journal, vol. 4, 2005 programmes. She is currently starting a Ph.D. research project
2
Because IT may not have a direct financial and customer on IT governance and IT skills.
4 I N F O R M AT I O N S Y S T E M S C O N T RO L J O U R NA L , VO L U M E 6 , 2 0 0 7
Information Systems Control Journal, formerly the IS Audit & Control Journal, is published by the Information Systems Audit and Control Association, Inc.. Membership in the association, a voluntary
organization of persons interested in information systems (IS) auditing, control and security, entitles one to receive an annual subscription to the Information Systems Control Journal.
Opinions expressed in the Information Systems Control Journal represent the views of the authors and advertisers. They may differ from policies and official statements of the Information Systems Audit
and Control Association and/or the IT Governance Institute® and their committees, and from opinions endorsed by authors' employers, or the editors of this Journal. Information Systems Control Journal
does not attest to the originality of authors' content.
© Copyright 2004 by Information Systems Audit and Control Association Inc., formerly the EDP Auditors Association. All rights reserved. ISCATM Information Systems Control AssociationTM
Instructors are permitted to photocopy isolated articles for noncommercial classroom use without fee. For other copying, reprint or republication, permission must be obtained in writing from the
association. Where necessary, permission is granted by the copyright owners for those registered with the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC), 27 Congress St., Salem, Mass. 01970, to photocopy articles
owned by the Information Systems Audit and Control Association Inc., for a flat fee of US $2.50 per article plus 25¢ per page. Send payment to the CCC stating the ISSN (1526-7407), date, volume,
and first and last page number of each article. Copying for other than personal use or internal reference, or of articles or columns not owned by the association without express permission of the
association or the copyright owner is expressly prohibited.
www.isaca.org
I N F O R M AT I O N S Y S T E M S C O N T RO L J O U R NA L , VO L U M E 6 , 2 0 0 7 5