Task B (1600 Words) : Background of The Project (Project Location, Requirements and Outcomes)
Task B (1600 Words) : Background of The Project (Project Location, Requirements and Outcomes)
Task B (1600 Words) : Background of The Project (Project Location, Requirements and Outcomes)
190 kW electric power for North-western China. Its dual functions which are the production of significant amount of electric power and the project can also be used as greenhouse for agriculture purposes.
information system, communication system, risk management system and audit system what all were reported to the project manager and top management of the organisation. Tools and techniques used in project control Earned Value Analysis (EVA)
This is the report that will indicate project progress. Final cost and completion date is forecasted, variances for budget and schedule were considered, and thus, control is indicated in terms of numerical data. These important variances and their causes drew immediate attentions from the project manager because theses will lead to projects delays. This performance reporting was an effective control tool for the project. This is based on the beliefs that performance can be quantify in terms of financial value and in the end will measure project performance efficiency. Therefore, the earned value is the value of work at budgeted rate. Key performance indicators (KPI)
This tool aimed to generate continuous improvement in the execution of the project. The KPI was expressed in terms of ratios and percentages that in the long run the project
manager kept track trends in work performance. In this case several KPIs were used to control and manage individual and group performance. Clear standards and requirements were used to base key job performances. Microsoft Project
In order to control schedule during the duration of the project, Microsoft Project was the software used. Costs and schedule was encoded daily to the system. All factors the will affect over-all costs were considered. This is a software program that was developed by Microsoft in order to assist project managers in establishing the weekly project plans, properly distributing resources for tasks, project budgeting, monitoring progress and workload analysis. On the other hand, by using this tool, the original schedule and forecasted schedule can be seen. Therefore, project scheduling can be appropriately achieved. Aside from monitoring critical tasks, this tool also determines project durations. This was the most effective tool in the management of the project. Control Process
Go/no-go control system was the control process adapted by the system. The established project plan parameters were always compared to the weekly collected parameters. This was in addition to the weekly progress reports that were submitted to the project manager and top senior managers of the parent organisation. In the first phase of the project, the comparison of the project forecast and tasks accomplished were met. At that phase, everything was completed according to the project plan. However, considering the isolation of the project location, supplies were not delivered on time the causes delays. Several planned procedures were cancelled due to these delays.
manager. This estimate was used for the parent organisations project cost in the purpose of budgeting and funding. The project control system was effective in regards to cost control since it identified potential problems such as delays very well before it will happen and at the same time evaluated the effect of these problems. In this regard, the project manager can then proposed actions to be taken to alleviate the condition and can do regular monitoring of project situations to effectively prevent uncertainty. The project control system in this case was more on the keeping the project in a no surprises situation. One of the elements of the project control system is the development of the project schedule that essentially was developed for monitoring the scope of the operations. This system was developed under project control. In the weekly report to the project manager, this was based on the scope of the operations and was open for review and comments. Coordination
meetings were held with the project manager and other workers concern following the weekly reports.
In the implementation of the Earned Value Analysis (EVA) as shown in Figure 2, the schedule variance and actual cost are shown. This indicated that the project is on the right track in terms of budget. The report means that the project is under schedule and represented in the graph as negative schedule variance. In relation with the planned value, the actual cost to accomplish the task was stated. The Earned Value relates the planned cost and the status date. Although, the project experienced delays due to the delivery of materials, there were no major problems regarding not meeting cost objectives. The project control system was also effective in terms of holding down costs, delivering faster project schedule aside from anticipating problems. In this project, it was necessary to accomplish cost estimate before project execution. After performing the magnitude estimate, the cost values was corroborated and detailed cost estimate was established. Project schedule in Microsoft Project was adjusted and in the Earned Value Analysis forecasted project completion date and project cost was evaluated. In the middle of the project by using these tools, the project schedules and work schedules were adjusted to arrive with the acceptable completion date. Microsoft Project and Earned Value Analysis were used in the improvement of the project control system during the duration of the project. As a result of this system, problems encountered were appropriately evaluated and actions taken to solve these problems were more on a team work approach. Over-all, the project control system was deemed successful in achieving the projects goal and objectives.
Conclusion
To summarised, the project control system used techniques and tools to appropriately implement the system. Primarily the submission of weekly progress report to the project manager was done to emphasise regular monitoring in terms of percent complete and earned value. This empowered the project manager to focus resources toward achieving project goals. These reports also enabled the project manager to anticipate problems before it will happen. In response, the system helped provides the development of the solutions of these
problems. The process control system also facilitated to meet the cost and schedule requirements that were established before project execution. In order to improve the process control system in this case, project risk assessment should be integrated to the project weekly progress report. Since the delays of the delivery of several importance materials were the primary factor and other related logistics problems that is basically due to the projects location, risk management will be a great advantage for process control.