Land Transport Masterplan
Land Transport Masterplan
Land Transport Masterplan
MP-endpaperproposal.indd 8-9
2/18/08 6:18:47 PM
For Singapore to realise its aspirations to be a thriving global city, its transport infrastructure is critical. Over the next 10 to 15 years, the transport system must support economic growth, a bigger population, higher expectations and more diverse lifestyles. With this in mind, we embarked on a comprehensive Land Transport Review in October 2006. We solicited and beneted from contributions from a broad spectrum of people including students, workers, employers, commuters, transport operators, ordinary Singaporeans and experts; at home and abroad. In total, more than 4,500 people contributed their time, energies and ideas to this review. The culmination of this effort is a Land Transport Masterplan that strives to make Singapore a great city to live, work and play in. This calls for major changes to vastly improve our land transport system. It is a plan to build and develop a more people-centred transport system that is technologically intelligent, yet engagingly human. Singaporeans can look forward to a more integrated and user-friendly public transport system. Fast and reliable bus services will complement a greatly expanded rail network to bring people where they want to go quickly. Tree-lined sheltered walkways in the heartlands and bustling underground walkways lled with shops in the city will ensure a pleasant walk to bus and train stations for all commuters. Varied transport choices like premium buses, taxis and cycling will help to cater to different needs. With the construction of new expressways, island-wide connectivity will also be signicantly improved. The enhanced ERP system will help to keep trafc free owing, enabling our city to reap the benets of growth and vibrancy. Ultimately, our aim is for a land transport system that places people at its heart. This requires a continual process of planning and adjustments as our economy and society will change over time. In doing so, we will plan with our people rmly in mind and actively engage the community in shaping transport policies and plans.
MINISTERS FOREWORD
RAYMOND LIM
MP-endpaperproposal.indd 10-11
2/18/08 6:18:48 PM
This Land Transport Masterplan is the result of the exciting work we began in October 2006, when LTA undertook the Land Transport Review in consultation with the Ministry of Transport. The Review brought LTAs Board members, management and staff together with members of the public, other government agencies and private stakeholders to discuss the many issues we face in our land transport policy. The focus group discussions, the online feedback on our Talk2LTA portal, the insights gained of those who played The Great Transport Challenge 2020 e-game and more have contributed to our Masterplan for the next 10 to 15 years, picking up where the 1996 White Paper on A World Class Land Transport System has brought us. Since 1996, LTA has delivered on many of its goals. But the next 10 to 15 years will be more challenging: a growing population, expanding economy and the publics higher expectations will test our mettle to make public transport predominant, manage congestion and meet the many needs of our people. These goals are achievable and are essential to the long-term, overall success of Singapore and our economy. The Masterplan maps the road ahead for our land transport system and prioritises the work for LTA. Delivering the desired outcomes by 2020 will not be easy, but LTAs board members, management and staff are fully committed to make every resource available to making a people-centred land transport system a reality.
CHAIRMANS MESSAGE
iii
ARF ALS AYE BCR BKE BRT CBA CBD CCTV CNG CO2 COE CPF CTE ECP EMAS ERL ERP EWL FDBL GLIDE GNSS GPS GPV GRA GVR HDB IMTI IRR ITS IU LRT LTAABBREVIATIONS KPE J-EYES JIE KJE MCE MEWR MOT MRT MTR NEA NETS NPARKS NPV NSCS NSE NSEW NSL OMV PCU PGS PIE POB PPP PTO PTC QOS RCPS RTS RZ SBST SLE SMRT SPRING SURS TPE TSL UITP USEPA VQS WHO WIS
ARF ALS AYE BCR BKE BRT CBA CBD CCTV CNG CO2 COE CPF CTE ECP EMAS ERL ERP EWL FDBL GLIDE GNSS GPS GPV GFA GVR HDB IMTI IRR ITS IU LRT LTA J-Eyes JIE KJE KPE
Additional Registration Fee Area Licensing Scheme Ayer Rajah Expressway Benet Cost Ratio Bukit Timah Expressway Bus Rapid Transit Cost-Benet Analysis Central Business District Closed Circuit Television Compressed Natural Gas Carbon Dioxide Certicate of Entitlement Central Provident Fund Central Expressway East Coast Parkway Expressway Monitoring Advisory System Eastern Region Line Electronic Road Pricing East-West Line Full Day Bus Lane Green Link Determining System Global Navigation Satellite System Global Positioning System Goods-cum-passenger Vehicle Gross Floor Area Green Vehicle Rebate Housing and Development Board Integrated Multi-modal Travel Information System Internal Rate of Return Intelligent Transport System In-vehicle Unit Light Rapid Transit Land Transport Authority Junction Electronic Eyes System Jurong Industrial Estate Kranji Expressway Kallang-Paya Lebar Expressway
MCE MEWR MOT MRT MTR NEA NETS NParks NPV NSCS NSE NSEW NSL OMV PCU PGS PIE POB PPP PTO PTC QoS RCPS RTS RZ SBST SLE SMRT SPRING SURS TPE TSL UITP USEPA VQS WHO WIS
Marina Coastal Expressway Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources Ministry of Transport Mass Rapid Transit MTR Corporation National Environment Agency Network for Electronic Transfers National Parks Board Net Present Value National Safety Council of Singapore North-South Expressway North-South and East-West Lines North-South Line Open Market Value Passenger Car Unit Parking Guidance System Pan-Island Expressway Pedestrian Overhead Bridge Purchasing Power Parity Public Transport Operator Public Transport Council Quality of Service Range-based Car Parking Standard Rapid Transit System Restricted Zone SBS Transit Ltd Seletar Expressway SMRT Corporation Ltd Standards, Productivity and Innovation Board Singapore Underground Road System Tampines Expressway Thomson Line Union Internationale des Transports Publics (International Association of Public Transport) United States Environment Protection Agency Vehicle Quota System World Health Organisation Workfare Income Supplement Scheme
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
page 2
CONTENTS
6 CONCLUSION
page 82
ANNEX B: KEY FINDINGS OF THE SINGAPORE PUBLIC TRANSPORT INDUSTRY STRUCTURE REVIEW
page 91
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
The 1996 White Paper on A World Class Land Transport System has guided our land transport development over the past decade. It has delivered a land transport system that has served Singaporeans well. However, our population has increased signicantly in the intervening years and become more diverse. Expectations have also risen with growing afuence. By 2020, we expect that travel demand would increase from the current 8.9 million journeys a day to about 14.3 million journeys a day. Given the land constraint of our small island state, the projected increase in travel demand must be met largely by public transport as it is the most space-efcient means of carrying large numbers of people. However, the public transport mode share during the morning peak hours has declined from 67% in 1997 to 63% in 2004. The challenge is not just to reverse this declining trend but to raise it and to ensure that our public transport system can cater to the signicant increase in travel demand. We also need to re-examine our policies to better meet the needs of the greying population, the higher expectations of our people as well as the less privileged and lower income group. It is therefore timely for us to review our current strategies in the light of the new challenges to meet our peoples needs and aspirations.
By 2020, we aim for at least 85% of public transport commuters to complete their journey within 60 minutes during the morning peak hours, from the time they set out on their journey to their destination (i.e. door-to-door journey time), up from 71% today. Average public transport journey times will be reduced from 1.7 times of that by car today to 1.5 times by 2020.
expanded and much denser rail network will extend the reach of the RTS to many more people and places. Within the Central Area, a commuter will be able to access a RTS station within ve minutes walk on average. Capacity on the existing lines will also be enhanced by increasing the frequency of trains. Commuters can look forward to better connectivity and a more comfortable ride on the trains.
determine whether ERP rate changes on an expressway or road are necessary. With this change, at least 85% of motorists will generally be assured of smooth travel on ERP-priced roads, as opposed to using average speeds today where a signicant proportion of motorists may, on some routes, travel at speeds below the optimal speed ranges. Increase the initial ERP charges and subsequent rate adjustment to make sure that the ERP rates remain effective in inuencing motorists behaviour. Set up ve new gantries along the Singapore River to manage congestion in the city area more effectively by cutting down through trafc between the commercial and shopping areas of Bugis, Marina Centre, Bras Basah and Clarke Quay, and the ofce-based area of Shenton Way and Rafes Place.
With the above changes, ERP coverage will be more extensive and ERP charges will be higher. Motorists who choose to drive on priced roads during the ERP operational hours will generally experience smoother and faster journeys. We will continue to lower vehicle ownership taxes such as Additional Registration Fees (ARF) and road taxes, as we rely more on usage charges.
Parking policy
Besides ERP, parking policy is another lever that will restrain car usage. We will continue with the current approach where Government determines the minimum parking provision while car park operators determine the parking charges based on market demand. As we apply the prevailing parking provision standards (which have been progressively lowered since 1990) to new developments, and allow conversion of some excess parking spaces in old buildings, parking supply in the city will gradually decline over time and parking charges will rise. A Parking Guidance System (PGS) will be implemented to guide motorists to the nearest building with available parking to reduce circulating trafc looking for parking lots.
Close short gaps between the park connectors and transport nodes to cater to commuters who cycle to the MRT stations or bus interchanges; and Install appropriate road signs to alert motorists to the presence of cyclists along frequently used routes.
CONCLUSION
Our ultimate aim is a land transport system developed with our people rmly in mind, planned for their needs, and one that makes it possible for all Singaporeans to enjoy an active lifestyle in a vibrant global city. The human dimension will take centre stage as we build a people-centred land transport system for all. A list of the key initiatives of this Land Transport Masterplan is in Annex A.
Facilitate cycling
With its increasing popularity, cycling can be a non-motorised transport option to bring commuters to major transport nodes. To facilitate cycling, LTA will: Provide better bicycle parking facilities around MRT stations and bus interchanges; Allow foldable bicycles onto buses and trains on a trial basis;
10
11
1
THE ROAD THUS FAR
The 1996 White Paper on A World Class Land Transport System set out our vision to build a land transport system that would meet the needs and demands of a dynamic and growing city. Four key strategies were identied to realise this vision: Integrating transport and land use planning Expanding the road network and maximising its capacity Managing demand of road usage Providing quality public transport choices
The above strategies have served as a road map for our land transport developments for the past decade, in delivering a land transport system that has served Singaporeans well.
14
our road users needs and expectations. A survey1 conducted in May 2007 showed that a signicant majority (80% 91%) of respondents were satised with the quality of the road infrastructure, level of road safety, operations of the trafc systems (such as trafc lights), efciency and connectivity of the road network, as well as the provision of trafc information. However, a smaller proportion (about 55%) was satised with travelling speeds along roads within the CBD and expressways during the morning peak hours.
FIG. 1.2 Average MRT/bus fare (S$/trip) for major cities* MRT BUS
$2.45
$1.40 $0.91
$1.15
$1.15
30.8km/mil
SINGAPORE
The White Paper envisaged that the RTS network would grow from 67km in 1995 to 160km over the long term. With the opening of new lines such as the North-East Line and Sengkang/Punggol Light Rapid Transit (LRT) system, our RTS network now stands at 138km. This has brought about a rail network density that is comparable to that in Hong Kong (Figure 1.1). Between 1996 and 2007, the number of bus services has increased by 36%, from 239 to 325 services. This, together with the increase in capacity, allows buses to cater to the different travel needs of the commuters. With the expansion of our RTS network and the increase in the number of bus services, the usage of mass public transport has also continued to grow. From 1996 to 2007, daily mass public transport ridership rose by 14.4% to 4.5 million. In 2005, a new fare adjustment formula was introduced. This new formula, which takes into account macroeconomic factors such as ination and changes in wages, better reects the actual economic conditions faced by commuters in general while allowing operators to keep up with changes in operating costs. This helped to balance the interests of both operators and commuters. We have kept public transport fares affordable and our fares are low compared to other major cities (Figure 1.2). A Public Transport Customer Satisfaction Survey conducted in 2007 showed that 86.5% of respondents were satised with bus and rail services in Singapore. About 80% of the respondents were satised with the overall travel time on buses and trains as well. Overall accessibility and location of the bus stops and MRT stations (85%) and the overall safety and security of our public transport system (83%) came out tops. As for taxis, the fares were deregulated in 1998. In 2003, the taxi market was further liberalised to allow entry of new players. A new Taxi Operator License framework and a set of Quality of Service (QoS) standards were introduced to license taxi companies and ensure minimum service standards. The taxi supply has grown from 16,857 in 1996 to 24,446 taxis as at end 2007, and there are now four new players in the market. Compared to major cities like Hong Kong, London and New York, we have the highest number of taxi per million population, while taxi fares have remained relatively low (Figures 1.3 and 1.4). More innovative services such as personalised limousine taxi and taxi tourist guide services were also introduced to better cater to commuters demands.
*
SINGAPORE
HONG KONG
LONDON
NEW YORK
TOKYO
30.0km/mil
HONG KONG
58.1km/mil
LONDON
5,129/mil 2,642/mil
44.8km/mil
NEW YORK
3,285/mil
1,522/mil
NEW YORK
34.4km/mil
TOKYO
SINGAPORE
HONG KONG
LONDON
Public Opinion Survey on Road and Trafc Management 2007. Data sources for Fig. 1.1 1.4: LTA; Transport Department, MTR Corporation Ltd and the Kowloon Motor Bus Co. (1933) Ltd, Hong Kong; Transport for London (TfL); MTA (Metropolitan Transportation Authority) New York City Transit, New York Metropolitan Transportation Council (NYMTC), New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission (TLC) and American Public Transportation Association (APTA); Tokyo Bureau of Transportation, Tokyo Bureau of Construction and Tokyo Metro Co. Ltd.
SINGAPORE
HONG KONG
LONDON
NEW YORK
16
All foreign currencies are converted to Singapore dollars using Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) conversion factor 2005 (Source: World Bank 2007 World Development Indicators)
2
THE WAY FORWARD
While the 1996 White Paper has served us well over the past decade, our society and economy have evolved in the intervening years. Our population has increased signicantly, and this growth is expected to be sustained for the next 10 to 15 years, placing greater demands on our land transport system. In addition, our needs and aspirations have changed as our society becomes more diverse, and expectations have risen with growing afuence. Therefore, we must improve upon our current strategies to meet the new challenges and review our land transport system to be more people-centred to meet Singaporeans needs and aspirations.
Given these challenges, our vision is a people-centred land transport system that meets the diverse needs of an inclusive society and provides for a liveable and vibrant global city. To this end, we have identied three key strategic thrusts that will shape our land transport policies and development for the next 10 to 15 years.
20
21
CHALLENGES
Increasing travel demand and limited land Declining public transport mode share Changing demographics and expectations
STRATEGIC THRUSTS
Making public transport a choice mode Managing road usage Meeting the diverse needs of the people
3
MAKING PUBLIC TRANSPORT A CHOICE MODE
To make public transport a choice mode, the public transport system must be well integrated from the commuters perspective, providing good coverage with seamless connectivity, high quality service in terms of reliability, comfort, convenience and competitive travel time relative to cars, and charge affordable fares. Our target is to ensure that by 2020, at least 85% of public transport commuters complete their journey within 60 minutes from the time they set out on their journey to their destination (i.e. door-to-door journey time) during the morning peak hours, up from 71% today. We will intensify our efforts to improve public transport through the following initiatives: LTA will take on the role of a central bus network planner by 2009. It will adopt a more commuter-centric approach in planning the bus routes to create a more integrated and service-oriented public transport network. Bus and rail services and frequencies will be improved to enhance the hub-andspoke model so that commuters can reach the hub quickly and enjoy seamless transfers at the hub; A distance-based through-fare structure will be adopted by 2009 to remove fare penalty associated with transfers. Commuters will be charged a fare based on the total distance travelled in a journey, without incurring any fare penalty when they make a transfer; An integrated season pass will be introduced by December 2008 to allow unlimited travel on both train and basic bus services; Greater priority will be given to buses on the roads so that commuters can enjoy faster travel and greater reliability on buses. We aim to improve average bus speeds to 20 25kph by 2009, up from 16kph for feeder buses and 19kph for trunk buses today; RTS network will be doubled from 138km today to 278km by 2020 to enhance its coverage and connectivity. Commuters in the Central Area4 will be able to access an RTS station within 400m or ve minutes walk on average; Greater contestability will be introduced in the public transport industry to encourage greater efciency and service improvements for the benet of commuters. The licence period for future RTS operating licences will be shortened while the basic bus service market will be opened up gradually to allow greater competition; and Overall journey experience will be enhanced through the provision of covered linkways and pedestrian overhead bridges; integrated transport hubs; real time public transport travel information; platform screen doors at above-ground MRT stations; and greater security measures to achieve a commuter-centric public transport system that is reliable, easy to use and safe.
Average public transport journey times will be reduced from 1.7 times of that by car today to 1.5 times by 2020 to make public transport more competitive relative to cars. Our end in mind is to have a public transport system that will be so attractive that users with choice, i.e. those who can have access to cars, will say that my other car is a bus or train.
Central Area includes the CBD and fringe employment centres at River Valley, Rochor, Newton and Outram.
27
28
trains so that commuters can expect seamless and quick transfers as they continue with their journeys. With the revisions to the QoS standards for basic bus services announced in July 2007, commuters can expect shorter waiting times as the headways of at least 80% of the bus services are shortened to not more than 10 minutes during peak hours on weekdays, compared to the current standard of 15 minutes.5 Overall, LTA will plan the bus routes to optimise network efciency from the commuters viewpoint. Transfers will be seamless and overall journey time will be shorter.
The operators are given two years, up to August 2009, to comply with this new QoS.
31
TOP RIGHT Fig. 3.1 Mandatory give-way at bus bays. BOTTOM RIGHT Fig. 3.2 Signal priority for buses at junctions.
Our aim is to achieve bus speeds of 20 25kph by 2009, up from 16kph for feeder buses and 19kph for trunk buses today. LTA will implement the following bus priority measures:
ii)
32
TOP RIGHT Fig. 3.3 Bus Rapid Transit in Bogota, Columbia. Photo courtesy of Millonario (Source: Wikimedia Commons). BOTTOM RIGHT Fig. 3.4 Tram in Bordeaux, France.
BRT is a rapid transit-like service that has buses running on semi or fully segregated roadways (Fig. 3.3). Key features of BRTs include: High quality buses for better image, comfort and service Stops that facilitate level boarding Travel information system and off board ticketing system to reduce boarding time Trams are electrically powered MRT-like trains of a smaller scale running on rail tracks tted on roadways (Fig. 3.4). Key features of trams include: Stations or stops with level boarding in ensuring accessibility for all Environmentally friendly and aesthetically pleasing
ii)
The dates provided for the proposed lines are indicative only and the actual implementation will depend on the projected ridership, which depends on the rate of development along the corridors they serve.
iii)
iv)
34
RIGHT Fig. 3.5 Map showing existing and proposed RTS lines.
Existing RTS Line North-South Line (NSL) North-East Line (NEL) East-West Line (EWL)
36
for commuters who wish to have personalised door-to-door service like cars. The taxi industry has been liberalised and government does not regulate the fares or supply of taxis. As the regulator of taxi services, LTA sets the QoS standards to maintain taxi service quality and protect commuters interests. It also facilitates the working of the taxi industry by working closely with the taxi companies and taxi drivers associations to improve the level of taxi service. For example, LTA provided additional taxi stands in the CBD so that there will be a taxi stand within ve-minute walk from all buildings in the CBD to make it safer and easier for commuters to hail a taxi. LTA will be rening the taxi QoS to ensure greater taxi availability during peak periods through phone booking, and reviewing the penalty framework to ensure that the standards better reect commuter experience on the ground. To complement the taxi companies call booking systems, LTA will set up a common call booking telephone number for taxis by July 2008. This will make it more convenient for the public, especially the tourists, to call for a taxi as they will only need to remember one telephone number, instead of the different telephone numbers of each taxi company today. Beyond the above initiatives, LTA will continue to engage the various stakeholders, including the taxi companies, taxi drivers associations and the public to proactively identify and resolve issues and difculties facing the taxi industry to ensure the provision of quality taxi services.
38
network should not be compromised as the seamless working of the whole network is what gives value to the commuters. Hence, we will introduce greater contestability to the RTS industry to ensure that the operators continue to operate efciently and improve service standards to benet the commuters. Future RTS operating licences will have shorter duration, compared to the 30-year licences today. This will also give LTA greater exibility to review licence conditions or appoint a new operator should the incumbent operator fail to maintain good performance. For the bus industry, our studies and overseas examples have shown that there are limited economies of scale for bus operations above a eet size of 500 buses. Hence, the current bus industry, which has a total of about 3,700 buses, can potentially support more than two operators. We will gradually open up the basic bus service industry for greater competition to improve the efciency of bus operations. We are not looking at competition in the market where the bus operators compete for the same market share. This will destroy integration and lead to wasteful duplication. Instead, we are looking at competition for the market where there is competitive tendering for the right to operate a package of bus services planned by LTA. Competitive tendering for bus services is not new. There is a clear international trend towards engaging multiple bus operators to provide bus services through competitive tendering. Such competitive pressures will drive better efciency, service quality and innovation among the operators. LTA will study the transition carefully, taking into account the existing Bus Service Operator Licences and Bus Service Licences that have been awarded to the incumbent operators.
ii)
As we expand the RTS network, future lines will be more expensive to build, operate and maintain as they will be mostly underground. On the other hand, the current network is most protable as they are serving a more built up and heavier demand corridor. Hence, to keep up the pace of rail expansion, we will rene the nancing framework to allow for a network approach, instead of a line approach, to be adopted in evaluating new lines. This will potentially enable future new lines to be implemented a few years earlier, so long as the entire rail network remains viable.
40
For the bus industry, we will look into the need for Government to fund the provision of some common facilities such as bus depots and integrated service information or bus arrival information system. This will also help to lower the entry barriers for the provision of bus services and ensure the contestability of the market. We will continue to look into opportunities for Public-Private-Partnerships in the funding and provision of public transport infrastructure.
42
points among friends and family. Besides bus interchanges, such lifestyle hubs can also be found at RTS stations such as Rafes Xchange at Rafes Place MRT station and Tanjong Pagar MRT station.
The Integrated Multi-Modal Travel Information System (IMTI) will provide commuters with comprehensive travel information on different platforms such as the mobile phone and the internet (via GPRS/ WAP/ WIFI). The two centrepieces of the IMTI are:
The electronic interactive map (Fig. 3.6), allows commuters to easily access real time public transport vehicle locations and information on bus arrivals, either by service number or by specic bus stop. Other information available on the interactive map may include service routes and the bus stops, RTS stations and major landmarks along the service route. The Public Transport Travel Advisor is an advanced version of the Public Transport Journey Planner. It will feature a multimodal door-to-door journey planner, including walking routes between origins/destinations and nearby public transport interchanges and stations. Commuters can use the enhanced search options to search for travel routes by shortest travel distance, shortest travel time or cheapest fares, etc. There will also be notication of service disruptions or route changes and information on alternative travel routes. Commuters can use this information to plan their preferred alternative routes as necessary.
44
TOP LEFT Fig. 3.6 An Integrated Islandwide Public Transport Map (artist impression only). BOTTOM LEFT Fig. 3.7 Proposed platform screen doors.
1.5m
46
47
4
MANAGING ROAD USAGE
To keep trafc owing smoothly on our roads, we must adopt a holistic package of measures that includes promoting public transport, road expansion as well as managing demand for road use by controlling vehicle growth and restraining usage. Through the VQS, we will continue to control vehicle population growth to reduce pressure on road space. We will also strengthen the effectiveness of ERP as a key tool to manage travel demand. These measures will ensure that Singapore remains a liveable city. To better manage the use of our limited road space, we will: Enhance the effectiveness of ERP. Rene the method of measuring trafc speeds for triggering ERP rate changes by using the 85th percentile speed measurement method. This will ensure that 85% of motorists will be assured of smooth travel on ERP-priced roads, as opposed to using average or mean speed today where a signicant proportion of motorists may, for some routes, experience speeds below the optimal speed ranges. Revise the ERP rate structure to ensure that ERP rates remain effective in inuencing motorists behaviour. Introduce the Singapore River Line, i.e. ve new gantries along the Singapore River, to more effectively manage congestion within the city area in the evening. Upgrade the ERP technology in the longer term for greater effectiveness. Lower vehicle ownership taxes to strike a better balance between ownership and usage costs as we rely more on ERP to manage road usage. Lower the vehicle growth rate to 1.5% p.a. with effect from Quota Year 2009. This rate will be reviewed after three years. Expand road capacity to meet travel demand arising from economic and population growth. We will build the 21-km North-South Expressway (NSE) at an estimated cost of $7 $8 billion by 2020. Leverage on technology to optimise the use of our limited road space. We will expand the coverage of J-Eyes and the EMAS to cover more junctions and monitor trafc conditions on arterial roads respectively by 2013. Enhance road safety in collaboration with other agencies such as the Trafc Police Department and the National Safety Council of Singapore (NSCS).
The ERP scheme has remained essentially unchanged since its introduction in 1998. However, the trafc conditions on our roads today are very different from what they were 10 years ago. Growing afuence has led to a greater propensity to drive which in turn has caused a signicant increase in trafc volumes. The scale and intensity of trafc congestion today is therefore very much different from what it was a decade ago. With more cars on the road, congestion is now more prevalent, particularly during the peak periods. To ensure that ERP remains effective in addressing current and future trafc conditions and motorists continue to have a smooth journey on our roads, we need to continually review the scheme, taking into consideration the growth in the vehicle population and changes in driving patterns.
Trafc congestion is costly to the individual and society. It results in the loss of productive hours, environmental pollution, wasted fuel and adverse health effects, and if left unchecked, will undermine our quality of life and the overall efciency of the economy. To keep our roads smooth-owing, LTA will continue with a holistic and integrated approach using all the tools available, including building more roads, regulating vehicle growth, implementing trafc engineering solutions and promoting the use of public transport. In addition to the various measures, we also need to manage trafc demand through ERP.
The building of more roads is by itself not a sustainable approach in addressing trafc congestion, particularly in land-scarce Singapore, where 12% of our land is already taken up by roads. Even if land is not a constraint, the addition of a lane to an already congested road will only bring about a temporary improvement in trafc ow. This is because the initial improvement in trafc conditions will encourage more motorists to use the road. Drivers who previously used alternative roads may now nd this road more attractive. Those who previously chose to travel at other times may switch to travel during the peak periods and some public transport users may now choose to drive. Congestion soon returns. This is the phenomenon of latent or induced demand. The peak hour trafc that we see on any road does not represent the full trafc demand because congestion causes many potential trips to be cancelled or re-scheduled, or be diverted to public transport or to less congested routes or destinations. This problem of induced demand is what happened on the Central Expressway (CTE) and the East Coast Parkway (ECP). LTA widened the northbound CTE by one lane between Pan Island Expressway (PIE) and Ang Mo Kio Avenue 1 in 2002 to improve trafc speed, but within six months, congestion had built up again. Similarly, one lane was added to the eastbound ECP in February 2007 between Marina South and Fort Road and within two months the same trafc condition returned. Ultimately, the reason why building more roads alone is insufcient in itself is because it does not address the underlying problem that if road usage is not priced, our popular roads will be overused, resulting in congestion.
50
51
Why we need ERP (contd) Will it be enough to provide better public transport?
One argument commonly put forward is that a better public transport system will solve the problems of trafc congestion. A good public transport system will help but by itself will not ensure that the roads remain smooth-owing. Just as in the case of simply building more roads, building a new rail line will help to relieve congestion on the affected roads initially but is not a lasting solution. This is because once congestion is alleviated, driving on these roads becomes more attractive and in time, when more drivers use these roads, congestion returns.
This is why, in addition to the various measures that we pursue, such as road building and a better public transport system, we also need ERP or congestion charging. Of all the different measures to deal with congestion, ERP is the only one that deals directly with the problem by requiring individuals to take into account the costs of congestion caused by their driving to others.
LTA will make the following changes which will take effect progressively from July 2008 to ensure that ERP remains effective in managing congestion: Rening the method of measuring trafc speed for triggering ERP rate changes; Revising the initial ERP rates and rate increment/decrement; and Introducing the Singapore River Line to manage congestion in the city area.
52
to determine if ERP rate changes are necessary. The 85th percentile speed measurement method is an international trafc engineering practice for assessing trafc conditions. This means that at least 85% of motorists on ERP-priced roads will be assured of smooth travel, moving within the optimal speed ranges. It is also a more representative method for measuring actual traffic conditions, compared to the current practice of using average or mean speeds. The nature of using averages is such that lower speed readings can be evened out by higher speed readings, resulting in a significant proportion of motorists experiencing slow traffic on some routes, even though the average speed measured may be within the optimal speed ranges.
0.50
1.00
54
This Singapore River Line (see Figure 4.1) will be implemented in July 2008 during the evening peak period during weekdays and on Saturdays. It will reduce the through trafc, which currently makes up about 38% of the trafc, in these very busy zones. The concept is similar to the Orchard cordon where ERP was implemented to reduce through trafc, which would otherwise use roads inside the Orchard cordon to get to other areas. Our trafc surveys show that this has reduced through trafc on Orchard Road by 20%.
LEFT Fig. 4.1 Map showing proposed ERP gantries along the Singapore River.
In 1990, a 3% growth amounted to 16,000 additional vehicles a year. Today, with a vehicle population of about 850,000, a 3% quota amounts to 25,000 additional vehicles every year. At the current growth rate, the vehicle population will increase by 40% from todays level to about 1.2 million by 2020. It is important that we continue to control the vehicle population and keep its growth in tandem with the increase in road space because once a car is bought, its owner will tend to use it as much as possible. Over the past 15 years, the rate of total vehicle population growth has outstripped road development, as shown in Figure 4.2. Our road growth has been only 1% p.a. in the last 15 years and this rate will be halved to about 0.5% p.a. over the next 15 years. Clearly, it is not tenable to maintain the annual vehicle growth rate at the current rate of 3% p.a. The vehicle growth rate will therefore be lowered to 1.5% p.a. with effect from Quota Year 2009 i.e. May 2009. This rate will be reviewed after three years. We will then access whether a further reduction is necessary in light of the slowdown in road growth.
7
This reduction is also applicable to taxis and goodscum-passenger vehicles (GPV) which pay the same ARF rate as cars.
57
120
110 100 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 YEAR
Many cities in the world such as London, Hong Kong, Tokyo and New York rely on parking policies as a tool to manage the demand for road use, in the form of parking surcharges or restrictions on the supply of parking spaces. Such policies aim to move people out of their cars and onto public transport. In Singapore, we rely on ERP to manage road usage. As for parking, we have adopted the approach where Government determines the minimum parking provision while parking charges are market-driven, left to individual building owners or car park operators to determine. The current approach ensures adequate car park provision and allows the market to optimise the use of parking spaces through pricing. It has worked well and we will continue with the approach. The car parking standards were lowered in 1990 and further tightened in 2002. A range-based car parking standard (RCPS) was introduced in December 2005 to allow developers more exibility to reduce parking provision. As many of the buildings in the CBD were developed when our car parking standards were more generous, the existing supply of parking spaces in the CBD is signicantly higher than the current standards for car parking provision.8 Parking charges, especially season parking rates, in the city are low relative to cities like Hong Kong, London and Tokyo, as seen in Table 4.2.
Table 4.2: Comparison of season parking charges and parking provisions in CBD Singapore Season parking in CBD (S$) (average per month) 9 Parking spaces per 1,000 jobs 10 in CBD 160 200 Hong Kong 720 850 London >400 Tokyo 420
Today, there are 49,000 parking spaces in the CBD. If we apply the prevailing parking standards, there should only be 29,000 parking spaces based on current Gross Floor Area (GFA) of the buildings. Data source: LTA; Hong Kong Transport Department; London Borough Authorities; Tokyo Tourism Information. Foreign currencies are converted to Singapore dollars using PPP conversion factor 2005 (Source: World Bank 2007 World Development Indicators).
10 Union Internationale des Transports Publics (UITP) (International Association of Public Transport) Mobility in Cities database.
165
23
85
40
58
Going forward, as we apply the prevailing parking standard to new building developments as well as allow conversion of some excess parking spaces to other uses in old buildings, we can expect the parking supply in the CBD to reduce over time and parking charges to rise. However, this will be a gradual process. To avoid adding to trafc congestion when motorists search for a parking lot, a PGS will be implemented in city areas from March 2008 to guide drivers to the nearest parking facility with available parking spaces.
60
RIGHT Fig. 4.3 Map showing proposed Marina Coastal Expressway, NorthSouth Expressway and Kallang-Paya Lebar Expressway (Phase 2 opens in September 2008).
Where there are physical constraints limiting the scope for road widening and the traffic flow shows a tidal pattern, i.e. heavy traffic in one direction during the morning peak hours and in the opposite direction in the evening, LTA will consider implementing the reversible flow scheme. This allows traffic lanes from the direction with less traffic to be reversed for use in the peak direction, thereby optimising the capacity of existing roads. LTA will study the feasibility of introducing the reversible-flow scheme along suitable stretches of expressways where it meets the criteria. Another development that LTA is looking at is the Singapore Underground Road System (SURS). This comprises two concentric rings of underground tunnel each of about 15km in length. It encircles the city centre where most of the commercial activities are concentrated, and directly serves the Marina Bay area. Based on expected developments in the Central Area, SURS will likely be needed in the longer term, beyond 2020. LTA will monitor the development of the Central Area and review SURS implementation accordingly.
NSE
KPE
MCE
62
TOP RIGHT Fig. 4.4a Your Speed sign. CENTRE RIGHT Fig. 4.4b Advance road markings. BOTTOM RIGHT Fig. 4.4c Trafc calming markings.
fatalities for the past few years. While education and enforcement will continue to be undertaken to enhance road safety, engineering measures will also be intensied. Road surfaces at accident-prone sites will be treated with high skid-resistant material to give better control for all road users, particularly motorcyclists. In addition, roadside structures and devices such as vehicular impact guardrails and signages will be made more forgiving in the event of motorcyclists hitting them. Motorcyclists are also more prone to accidents when it rains. LTA has already provided 32 rain shelters for motorcyclists along expressways. Another 38 rain shelters will be built by the end of 2009.
A Your Speed Sign displays real-time speeds of motorists if they exceed the speed limit along a particular stretch of road (Figure 4.4a). Overseas experience with such vehicle-activated speed display signs have been shown to be effective in reducing vehicle speeds. For pedestrians, Advance Road Markings (Figure 4.4b) will be introduced before zebra crossings where necessary. The markings will provide early warning to motorists on their approach to zebra crossings to give way to pedestrians. Narrowing the road using visual effects has been shown to be an effective trafc calming tool to slow vehicles down. The UK practice of using Dragon Teeth road markings (Figure 4.4c) will be tried out in Singapore.
11
GLIDE intelligent trafc light system increases the carrying capacity of trafc light junctions by monitoring trafc ow in real time and optimising the duration of red and green signals for each direction of trafc. EMAS performs live-video trafc surveillance, incident detection and trafc advisory functions. It allows for prompt activation of vehicle recovery crews and other agencies (Trafc Police, Singapore Civil Defence Force, etc) to quickly attend to incidents. EMAS also informs motorists of prevailing trafc conditions through strategically located electronic signboards and radio broadcasting). J-Eyes is a system of surveillance cameras at signalised junctions to spot and rectify causes of trafc congestion.
12
13
64
trafc conditions on the roads are currently being developed by the industry. The implementation of ERP II with GPS-based technology will bring about potential spin-off developments which will help to enhance information dissemination for motorists, and this will in turn improve the overall efciency of our road network. All these will allow motorists to better plan their journeys by deciding when, how and where they want to travel. It will help to spread trafc demand over different modes, time and space and help relieve congestion on heavily used routes. The GPS-based technology used in ERP II could also play a role in providing dynamic eet management for commercial eet operators such as logistics or taxi companies. This could eventually lead to travel time savings and service improvements for businesses and commuters alike. The technology could also be employed to improve the operation and efciency of emergency services by giving priority to emergency vehicles on the road when the situation arises. Separately, LTA will also look into the use of radio to broadcast trafc information in a timelier manner to motorists and to host public education programmes on transport issues by third quarter 2008, thereby providing an additional avenue for LTA to engage the public more proactively. It will also look into the feasibility of setting up a dedicated radio channel for the above purpose.
66
5
MEETING THE DIVERSE NEEDS OF THE PEOPLE
Our transport system plays a key role in enabling every Singaporean to access the expanding opportunities of our vibrant city. With an extensive and efcient transport network, Singaporeans will enjoy convenient travel to their workplaces, schools and the myriad of leisure and entertainment options in our city. Transport is a basic need and we will ensure that everyone the young, the old, the disabled, and the needy has access to it. Therefore, moving ahead, we will reposition the land transport system to be more people-centred to meet the many diverse needs and aspirations of our people. The community as a whole can help to balance various transport demands at the local level, in contributing to transport policies and plans and in facilitating the implementation of transport solutions. As a maturing society, we will foster mutual accommodation and graciousness among the public transport commuters, motorists, cyclists and pedestrians who share our road space. Our transport policies will also give greater emphasis to environmental sustainability and preserving a high quality living environment. By doing so, we will enhance the quality of life not only for Singaporeans today, but also for future generations. Our aim is to ensure that our transport system is accessible to all and there is greater ownership of transport issues at the community level. To achieve a sustainable and socially inclusive transport system, we will: Ensure physical accessibility for all, including the elderly and the less mobile. New RTS lines will be designed to be more accessible, according to the standard in the latest requirements of the Code of Accessibility in Built Environment.14 All existing RTS stations have been retrotted with lifts in at least one entrance at the end of 2006. Additional lifts and ramps will be built at some stations by end 2011 to further enhance accessibility to these stations. Public bus eet will progressively be replaced with low-oor wheelchair-accessible buses. By 2010, 40% of our buses will be wheelchair-accessible and 100% by 2020.
14
enhanced connectivity to transport nodes such as bus interchanges and MRT stations. Promote environmental sustainability and ensure a high quality living environment. Encourage energy efciency and reduce carbon emissions by promoting the use of public transport and more energy efcient vehicles. Improve vehicle emission standards to promote a clean and healthy environment. Since 1 October 2006, all new diesel vehicles must comply with the Euro IV emission standard. Look into incentivising bus and taxi operators to consider cleaner technologies and fuels, such as using CNG, to improve air quality. Adopt environmentally sustainable practices in LTAs planning and development of transport infrastructure. Engage and involve the community in shaping and implementing land transport policy and plans. A new division in LTA will spearhead greater community engagement on transport matters. It will have dedicated teams assigned to each constituency to engage the community more closely on the ground. LTA will also launch a community outreach programme to engage transport stakeholders and the community.
The Code of Accessibility in Built Environment was launched on 12 October 2007 and would be enforced on 1 April 2008. This new Code is to replace the old Code on BarrierFree Accessibility in Buildings. It sets out the fundamental design and construction requirements and guidelines for making the whole Built Environment, which includes both buildings as well as the external spaces (e.g. walkways, courtyards), accessible to persons with physical or sensory disabilities or impairments.
Pedestrian walkways, access to MRT stations, taxi and bus shelters, and all public roads will be barrier-free by 2010, that is, they will be accessible to persons with disabilities, e.g. the wheelchair-bound or visually impaired and elderly persons. Ensure that lower-income Singaporeans have access to public transport, by providing targeted help to the needy through Government assistance such as the WIS and community help via the many helping hands approach. Facilitate cycling. Provide more and better bicycle parking facilities around MRT stations and bus interchanges from 2009. Allow foldable bicycles to be brought onto trains and buses on a trial basis from March 2008. Leverage on National Parks Boards (NParks) nation-wide network of Park Connectors to provide cyclists with
70
71
RIGHT Enhancing the accessibility of our land transport system for all. TOP RIGHT (L R) Fig. 5.1a Lift at MRT stations. Fig. 5.1b Tactile guidance system at MRT stations. CENTRE RIGHT (L R) Fig. 5.1c Wheelchair-accessible buses. Photo courtesy of SBS Transit Ltd. Fig. 5.1d Ramps at bus interchanges. BOTTOM RIGHT (L R) Fig. 5.1e Ramps at bus stops. Fig. 5.1f Smoothened road kerbs with tactile guides.
72
adjustment mechanism administered by the PTC protects the public by capping the allowable fare increase instead of letting the public transport operators (PTOs) charge what the market can bear, and by requiring the PTOs to share productivity gains with commuters. The PTC also tracks the proportion of income that an average commuting household15 spends on public transport to ensure fare affordability by the majority of commuters. However, we recognise that low-income households may need additional help to cope with rising transport costs. To help low-income families cope with increases in public transport fares as well as tackle their larger cost of living concerns, the Government has provided assistance to such households through various schemes such as the Progress Package, New Singapore Shares, Economic Restructuring Shares, CPF Top-Ups, rebates on utilities, rentals, service and conservancy charges. Low income workers will also receive more help under the WIS. Help from community schemes is also available, for example, public transport vouchers provided by the PTOs. Under the many helping hands approach, the Government, together with the community, will continue to provide targeted help to lowincome families to enable them to have access to public transport and job opportunities.
Based on surveys, this corresponds to the 2nd quintile (which is the 21st to 40th percentile) household income group.
In facilitating cycling, safety is always a priority. Following a pilot in Changi, LTA will implement appropriate signs to alert motorists of the presence of cyclists along frequently used recreational cycling routes such as those in the West Coast and Thomson areas from March 2008. LTA will also continue to work with other agencies and
74
the cycling community to promote safety awareness and implement measures to ensure the safety of cyclists and pedestrians.
LTA will look into providing more and better bicycle parking facilities at and around MRT stations and bus interchanges. The initiative will be progressively implemented. Priority will be given to towns which have high demand for such parking facilities. Prior to full implementation, LTA is considering a one-year pilot at selected MRT stations/bus interchanges in Pasir Ris, Tampines and Yishun. For example, Tampines Bus Interchange is going to be upgraded and, by end 2009, 150 new bicycle racks will be provided taking into account the current demand.
Transport
Buildings
Industry
19,315 (48%)
13,465 (33%)
7,056 (17%)
325 (1%)
216 (1%)
8,328 (21%)
930 (2%)
5,910 (15%)
3,415 (8%)
732 (2%)
21,793 (54%)
7,986 (19%)
6,235 (16%)
3,631 (9%)
732 (2%)
Others
77
A greater push toward improving energy efciency and reducing emissions in land transport would contribute signicantly towards cleaner air and better quality of life for Singaporeans.
78
79
LTA will review the current GVR scheme in consultation with Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources (MEWR)/National Environment Agency (NEA) to ensure that the incentives remain relevant even as technology evolves over time. We target to achieve a 7% improvement in the energy consumption per capita for the land transport sector by 2020, as part of the National Energy Efciency Programme.
With higher rebates on the taxes payable at registration, the road tax rebates for all green vehicles were removed.
To reduce trafc noise, LTA employs noise abatement measures such as planting trees to act as a buffer and selecting trains based on strict criteria to limit noise emission levels. LTA will continue to conduct research and develop new measures to minimise trafc noise.
80
81
6
CONCLUSION
As we embark on the new initiatives and work towards a more people-centred land transport system, we must continue to recognise that land transport is more than just getting from one point to another; it also makes possible an active lifestyle in a vibrant global city. With limited land supply and the need to serve a larger and more diverse population, and to protect our environment, the need to make public transport system a choice mode is imperative. By 2020, Singaporeans will enjoy an integrated, efcient and userfriendly public transport system. A vastly expanded rail network will enhance accessibility and provide fast and reliable connections for Singaporeans to travel from their homes to ofces or places of leisure and entertainment. The bus network will complement rail to ensure quick and seamless connections, and there will be a gamut of different options such as premium buses to meet different needs. Buses will travel unimpeded on bus lanes along major arterial roads, enjoy right of way to exit bus bays and priority at major junctions, helping to keep commuting time within 60 minutes for most passengers. Commuters can access travel information readily at bus stops and MRT stations, online or by phone to nd out when their bus or MRT will be arriving, or determine the shortest route to take. Those who prefer a more personalised door-to-door service will only need to remember one number to call a taxi, or nd a taxi stand within ve minutes walk in the CBD. Given the constraints on road expansion, road usage management will remain a priority, with ERP as a key tool for us to optimise the capacity of our roads. The enhanced ERP system will ensure that trafc remains smooth-owing most of the time, while we continue to lower ownership costs by reducing vehicle taxes. The use of ITS will provide motorists with a wealth of real time trafc information to better plan their routes, including parking guidance systems that will advise them on where parking is available. Our initiatives to increase accessibility will bring about a more socially inclusive land transport system that can better accommodate the special needs of the elderly, families with infants in prams and those with mobility difculties. By 2010, pedestrian walkways, access to transport nodes and all our roads will be barrier-free. In time to come, cycling can potentially be an alternative feeder to our public transport network as we provide more and better bicycle parking facilities at MRT stations and bus interchanges in the housing estates, and embark on trials to allow foldable bicycles onto our buses and trains. To minimise the impact of transport on the environment, we strive to reduce emissions through more stringent emission standards and the promotion of the GVR scheme, while recycling waste materials for use in road construction work. Our goal is a land transport system that places people at the centre. To achieve this, we will plan it with the commuters and the community in mind. We will expand our efforts to engage the community to ensure that we hear and address their needs, and incorporate ideas and suggestions where possible. The end result is an increased understanding of the choices we make together and the trade-offs we must balance, to build a land transport system for all of us.
84
By 2020, we will have an integrated, efcient and user-friendly public transport system that enables every Singaporean, including those with special needs, to take part in the life of the city. With a vastly expanded rail system and a bus network that works in close partnership with rail, commuters will have fast and reliable connections that bring them where they want to go seamlessly. To keep our roads free owing, we will lower our vehicle growth rate and enhance ERP. At the same time, we will continue to engage our community on how best to meet their different needs and aspirations. We will therefore develop a more people-centred land transport system that will allow Singaporeans to enjoy a quality urban environment now and into the future. The key initiatives are summarised below.
SUMMARY OF INITIATIVES
MAKING PUBLIC TRANSPORT A CHOICE MODE
BUS AND RAIL SERVICES LTA to be central bus network planner by 2009 Implement fully integrated distance-based through-fares by 2009
REF. SECTION
Introduce an integrated season pass by December 2008 to allow unlimited travel on both train and basic bus services Greater bus priority on the roads Extend bus lanes from 120km to 150km and full day bus lanes from 7.6km to 23km by June 2008 Make it mandatory for motorists to give way to buses existing bus bays by end 2008 Implement signal priority for buses at junctions starting with a pilot by end 2008
3.2
Gradually open up basic bus service market to allow competition for the market Encourage premium and innovative basic bus services Consider Government funding for provision of common facilities for bus services Double RTS network from 138km to 278km by 2020. Implement the following new lines: North-South Line Extension by 2015 Tuas Extension by 2015 Thomson Line by 2018 Eastern Region Line by 2020
17
3.6.1
3.3
Enhance capacity on existing RTS by increasing train frequency Revise Operating Performance Standards to prescribe minimum train headways Invest in additional trains and modication to signalling system and infrastructure to allow trains on NSEW line to operate at higher frequency
3.4
17
Introduce greater contestability in RTS industry by shortening licence period for future RTS operating licences Review rail nancing framework to support the expansion of the rail network
3.6.1
3.6.2
The dates provided for the proposed lines are indicative only and the actual implementation will depend on their projected ridership, which depends on the rate of development along the corridors they serve.
87
SUMMARY OF INITIATIVES
Install Platform Screen Doors at above-ground MRT stations by 2012 PUBLIC TRANSPORT TRAVEL INFORMATION
REF. SECTION
3.7.4
SUMMARY OF INITIATIVES
EXPANDING ROAD NETWORK AND IMPROVING ROAD SAFETY Implement Marina Coastal Expressway by 2013 Implement North-South Expressway by 2020
REF. SECTION
4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6
Implement integrated Public Transport Journey Planner with basic map features by July 2008 Provide integrated real-time bus arrival information at bus stops via SMS and various mobile platforms progressively from July 2008 Implement Integrated Multi-Modal Travel Information System INTEGRATION BETWEEN TRANSPORT NODES AND DEVELOPMENTS Double the number of covered pedestrian overhead bridges (POBs) from 192 today to 384 by end 2010 i.e. 86% of current POBs Build more air-conditioned bus interchanges integrated with RTS stations and retail/commercial activities: Boon Lay Bus Interchange by 2009 Clementi Bus Interchange by 2011 Develop another ve integrated interchanges at Serangoon, Bedok, Jurong East, Marina South and Joo Koon over next 10 years in tandem with re-development
3.7.3 Study implementation of Singapore Underground Road System 3.7.3 Study feasibility of reversible ow scheme on suitable stretches of expressways that show tidal trafc ow Enhance pedestrian safety with installation of new safety devices e.g. intelligent road studs at pedestrian crossings and personal electronic device for elderly pedestrians Increase motorist and pedestrian safety with new trafc calming measures e.g. Your Speed Sign, Advance Road Markings and Trafc Calming Markings Provide more rain shelters for motorcyclists along expressways, from 32 today to 70 by end 2009 LEVERAGING ON TECHNOLOGY Expand J-Eyes and EMAS from 509 cameras today to 1,049 cameras by 2013 Introduce Parking Guidance System from March 2008 Introduce more timely broadcast of trafc news & host education programmes on radio channels. Study feasibility of setting up trafc radio channel Allow payment of ERP charges by credit cards by mid 2008 Allow use of contactless smartcards in ERP IUs by end 2008 4.8.1
3.7.3
4.7
3.7.1
4.7
3.7.2
4.7
4.4 4.8.2
TAXI SERVICES Rene taxi QoS to ensure greater taxi availability during peak periods through phone booking Set up a common call booking telephone service for taxis by July 2008 3.5.3
3.5.3
4.8.4 4.8.4
4.1.2 4.1.3
5.1.2
4.5 4.4
5.1.3
88
89
SUMMARY OF INITIATIVES
FACILITATING CYCLING Provide more and better bicycle parking facilities at MRT stations and bus interchanges from 2009 Allow foldable bicycles on trains and buses on a trial basis from March 2008 Implement safety signs along commonly used cycling routes such as Thomson and West Coast from March 2008 SUPPORTING ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES Achieve 7% improvement in energy consumption per capita for the land transport sector by 2020 Adopt Euro IV standards for all diesel vehicles and work with taxi and bus operators to consider cleaner technologies or fuels e.g. CNG Promote the use of cleaner and more energy efcient vehicles, and review Green Vehicle Rebate (GVR) scheme regularly to ensure its relevance Use recycled waste materials for road resurfacing works and road pavement construction Adopt environmentally sustainable practices in design and construction of road and rail infrastructure to minimise noise and impact on environment Study impact of trafc noise and mitigating measures ENGAGING THE COMMUNITY Launch Community Outreach Programme in March 2008 to better engage the community on land transport policies and plans
REF. SECTION
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.4.3
5.4.2
5.4.3
5.4.4
5.4.4
5.4.4
5.5
ANNEX B: KEY FINDINGS OF THE SINGAPORE PUBLIC TRANSPORT INDUSTRY STRUCTURE REVIEW*
90
Low fares, low operating costs and full operating cost recovery
The Governments commitment to full operating cost recovery and the regulation of fare adjustments by the PTC creates an environment of strict nancial discipline for the operators. Among the major developed cities examined, only Hong Kong and Singapore fully recover public transport operating costs through the farebox, while most European cities have operating cost recovery ratios in the order of 40% to 60%. Table 1 summarises key statistics of major cities throughout the world.
Table 1: Performances of PT operations by cities Performance of PT operations by cities City Standardised (i) fare revenue per trip (euro cents) Standardised operating cost per passengerkm (euro cents) 4.4 7.1 9.0 11.0 14.4 9.4 36.1 15.0 12.3 32.4 13.1 18.3 26.3 Farebox ratio(ii) (%) Market share of whole day journeys by PT (%)
Singapore Hong Kong Prague Budapest Vienna Helsinki Marseilles Paris Madrid Berlin Copenhagen London Manchester
36.7 78.7 12.9 20.0 31.6 36.7 44.9 47.5 59.9 59.9 70.2 89.6 112.4
126.0 157.0 30.5 72.5 48.5 53.0 54.0 45.5 51.5 42.5 68.0 81.0 96.0
45.7 73.9 54.2 55.9 46.6 34.6 17.2 27.5 30.2 33.2 15.0 26.8 11.8
g)
(i) Standardised fare and cost includes discount fares and operating expenditure (ii) Revenue divided by operating costs as a percentage Source: UITP Mobility in Cities Database 2001
92
93
Table 2: Summary of key bus performance comparisons Operator ranking Functional area Indicator Bus (out of 11) SMRT buses Fares Passenger km: Revenue vehicle km Passenger boardings: Stations Fare: Passenger boarding Fare: Passenger km Affordability Index Op costs: Passenger boarding Op costs: Passenger km Farebox Recovery Ratio Staff: Bus Vehicle km: Staff 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 N/A N/A SBST 3 2 1 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 Bukit Panjang (8.0km) Sengkang (10.7km) Punggol (10.3km) Circle Line (33km)
MRT development due from 2010 due 2013 due 2015 due 2018
Downtown Line Stage 1 ( 4.3km) Downtown Line Stage 2 (16.6km) Downtown Line Stage 3 (19.1km)
System utilisation
LRT development Opened 1999 Opened 2003 (East Loop) Opened 2005 (West Loop) Opened 2005 ( East Loop) Other developments First priority bus lanes (Currently 120km of bus lanes) Full day bus lane Air-conditioned Bus Interchanges (BI) Toa Payoh Sengkang Ang Mo Kio Opened in 2002 Opened in 2003 Opened in 2007 Opened 1974 Extended to 8.0km in total in 2007
Financial performance
Productivity
Source: LTA PTO International Benchmarking Appraisal 2006 Benchmarked cities: Hong Kong, Sydney, Dublin, London, Barcelona, New York, Chicago, Stockholm, Vancouver, Montreal
Table 3: Summary of key RTS performance comparisons Functional area System utilisation Fares Indicator Passenger km: Revenue vehicle km Passenger boardings: Stations Fare: Passenger boarding Fare: Passenger km Affordability Index Operating costs: Passenger boarding Operating costs: Passenger km Farebox Recovery Ratio Operator ranking SMRT trains (out of 10) 2 4 2 1 1 1 1 2
Our assessment is that more action is required to further improve what is already a very good system. With the public transport mode share falling, without a strategy to improve bus services or to achieve higher RTS ridership, the Government is unlikely to realise its public transport goals. Table 5 provides a brief summary of our assessment of Singapores public transport industry when compared with the goals outlined in the 1996 White Paper.
Table 5: Assessment of Singapores public transport system against MOT and LTAs goals Goal To contribute to the Government objectives of increasing public transport mode share Assessment Public transport mode share is currently failing Car ownership is increasing notwithstanding ownership control and ERP High risk that new RTS lines will shift demand from buses rather than grow overall public transport market share RTS appears to be meeting this requirement better than buses Overall quality of bus services requires improvement Bus and RTS development is not conducted in a consistent and coordinated manner Lack of development at the points of interchange and in the provision of information There is an absence of integrated planning It will be a challenge for bus services to improve service standards without affecting its commercial viability
Financial performance
Source: LTA PTO International Benchmarking Appraisal 2006 Benchmarked cities: Hong Kong, Beijing, Shanghai, Taipei, London, Tyne & Wear, Barcelona, New York, Chicago
94
95
eets larger than 300 500 buses and competition for the market is intensied where there are multiple bus operators. Measures to ensure easy bus market entry and exit2 are necessary to maximise competition. For the rail industry, our international review found that competition in rail is also emerging as an effective driver of service improvements. Rail competition for the market3 has been used to drive performance improvements but the results have been more mixed. In most cities, the railways and metros continue to be operated by public agencies with little or no effective competition. Peer competition through the benchmarking of the rail systems is used in many of these places as an alternative to competitive tendering.
Integration
The integration of modes and services is most advanced in European cities. The typical European public transport model has a highly integrated, multi-modal network, little duplication of modes and a zone-based fare system with no fare penalty for interchange. Many of these cities have achieved similar or better public transport market shares than Singapore, despite having higher car ownership and lower population density. Our observations suggest that Singapores current multi-modal industry structure has not delivered world class integration of modes. Table 6 compares Singapores current performance across a range of system elements important in achieving an integrated network.
Table 6: Assessment of Singapores network integration
2
Cost recovery
Singapore, Hong Kong and Tokyo are notable as they achieved full operating cost recovery1 from their metro systems unlike all the other cities. In subsidised systems, the government contributes some 40% to 60% of operating costs; and it would appear (but not tested) that subsidies tend to grow over time as governments are often reluctant to increase fares in line with increasing costs or to fully fund new service initiatives.
Best practice Coordinated planning to ensure best use of available resources and an equitable trade-off between economic and social objectives No penalties for interchange between modes or services High quality, strategically located to minimise impact of transfer Extensive network information provided consistently throughout System branding to emphasise integration
Singapore Responsibility for planning of network is shared by LTA, PTC and bus operators
For example, bus depots leased to operators for the duration of the contract, market in used buses, transferability of staff between operators. For example, the UK established competitive rail franchises and these have now been established in a few other, selected locations. These contracts often are one of two types: (1) Short term (<10 years) operating franchises; and (2) Long term (>20 years) Build, Own, Operate and Transfer (BOOT) or variation schemes. These characteristics are enshrined in a draft regulation which will serve as a model for all EU cities.
Fare
Competition
1
Transfer penalties partially offset by fare rebates High quality rail/rail at all key nodes but only at three bus/rail locations Information is provided on a modal/operator basis Mix of brands (e.g. SBST, SMRT, TransitLink, ez-link)
Singapore recovers all RTS and bus operating costs through system revenue ( including fares, property and advertising). However, signicant subsidies are provided by Government to fund RTS system development.
For bus services, many cities around the world (such as those in Europe, Australia and Hong Kong) are increasingly using competition to minimise costs and/or improve service quality. In bus systems, competition (both in the market and for the market) is recognised to be the most valuable driver of cost efciency. Most cities have at least two or more major bus operators competing within their markets. There are no signicant economies of scale in bus
Interchanges
Information
Branding
96
97
This international experience forms the basis of our recommendations. The key lessons we believe are important to further improve Singapores public transport system, in order of importance, are as follows: Role of Government Network integration is best achieved through the active intervention of Government Network integration guidelines Network integration must nd a balance between user needs (i.e. demand for travel) and network resources (i.e. cost to satisfy) Procurement model Short-term contracts (<10 years) allow for increased competition and the regular review and redenition of system requirements Industry structure In many cities, multiple operators and competition promotes efciency and service quality Funding Full cost recovery is only achieved in a few developed countries and should be retained to promote nancial discipline Investment criteria Singapores current assessment methodologies may be understating the benets of system improvements
their roles are limited to schedule development. For bus operators, their role extends to network planning (within dened areas) and schedule/service development, while the PTC has an oversight role of the bus network. However, this system does not ensure the total network is actively developed for the best outcomes. It is recommended that the government take a lead role in bus network planning and development. This enables the Government to pursue its strategies of full network coverage and inter-modal integration. The Governments role should be increased to include: Integration of rail and bus services; Allocation of resources to meet unsatised demand; and Supporting network development through infrastructure investment in areas such as interchanges, travel information and bus priority.
Operators would retain control of service design according to stipulated standards and contribute to overall network planning. The operators would also continue to address local network planning issues such as responding to changes in road network or land use.
Network integration
The current focus of strategic network planning is to maximise RTS utilisation, limiting buses to that of a feeder mode. Under existing guidelines, competing bus services are rationalised after balancing between resource optimisation and the potential impact on commuters. Overall, this policy is likely to coincide with interests of the combined RTS/bus operator, but differs from interests of competing bus operators and some passenger groups. It is recommended that the existing guidelines should be reviewed to adopt a principle of overall network optimisation. The network design should seek to maximise the overall economic performance of the network (including consideration of both operator and user costs and benets) while continuing to respect the need to maintain cost recovery.
5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
In our view, the most important reform is expanding LTAs mandate to take on a more active role in the planning and development of the bus network. This will allow this sector of the transport system to be placed on an equal footing with RTS and road development. This will need to be complemented by the review of network development guidelines to ensure the right balance is struck between overall network efciency, community expectations and the Governments transport goals. In order to give effect to a more centralised approach to service development, new procurement models are also needed. With the above reforms, there is no necessity to maintain a policy of having multi-modal operators to encourage greater integration between modes. There remains a case, however, in maintaining multiple operators within each of the bus and rail sectors to ensure a competitive industry. A multi-operator environment is consistent with a greater role for Government in planning, specifying and procuring services. Modication of the existing funding mechanisms would provide greater exibility to implement new service initiatives but any change would add complexity and risk the introduction of operating subsidies. Should a more exible funding mechanism be adopted, then some revision to the current investment criteria will be necessary. The following sections provide in greater detail our observations and recommendations.
Role of Government
Network planning and development is currently split between the Government and the operators. LTA plans and develops road and rail infrastructure, and bus stops and interchanges. For rail operators,
98
99
reects the Governments greater role in network development and other proposed industry reforms. These changes would ensure consistency with the strategy of increasing competition with multiple operators and consistency with the greater role of Government in determining network and service quality. Government would procure bus and RTS services through a competitive process designed to maximise service quality while maintaining commercial viability. Changing the terms and conditions of the contracts to allow competition more frequently would enhance incentives for efciency.
recovery from revenue imposes a specic performance target on both Government and the operators, which sets a strong nancial discipline. However, a mechanism to allow re-distribution of system revenue across the network should be considered. It is also proposed that the PTC be allowed to approve a fare surcharge to raise funds to support non-commercial transport initiatives. Allocation of revenue in addition to any direct fare (or other) revenue provides greater exibility and a tool to prioritise the allocation of resources. The economic benets of a subsidy to ensure delivery of specic initiatives may be positive and may have signicant social benets.
Industry structure
SMRT and SBST are the incumbent multi-modal operators providing rail and bus services, overseen by PTC (bus) and LTA (rail). This model was intended to facilitate modal integration through common ownership of the complementary modes. However, this multi-modal operator model is not the best way to achieve a high standard of network integration in view of the limitations5 associated with dening appropriate operator areas. More importantly, neither operator has a mandate to plan an optimised network. Given the nature of the current structure, SMRTs interests lie in maximising the usage of the MRT, while SBSTs interests lie in increasing the use of the trunk bus services. This structure suggests one of competitive tension rather than a model of integration. Our recommendation is that integration will be more effectively realised through greater involvement in network development by the relevant central agencies (i.e. LTA). The existing multi-modal policy of promoting integration through common ownership is not necessary in the context of a greater role of Government in network planning and development.
Investment criteria
The Government currently applies both economic and nancial criteria to any new initiative. The LTA evaluates projects using discounted cash ow analysis which is a technique commonly used by transport agencies worldwide. This seeks to determine the net economic worth of projects using selection criteria such as net present value (NPV), benet cost ratio (BCR) and internal rate of return (IRR). The current assessment methodologies viz. Cost-Benet Analysis (CBA) for transport projects should be rened to include the residual value of capital investments and the valuation of user benets and externalities should be reviewed.
6.0 CONCLUSION
The intended effect of these recommended reforms will be to: Place bus on a more equal footing with RTS, in terms of gaining government support in planning and development, including providing access to new funding for infrastructure works; Give LTA a mandate and the mechanisms to fully integrate the public transport modes; Provide a new funding mechanism that allows the early implementation of system improvements, whilst still maintaining a commitment to full cost recovery; Dene the relationship between the public transport operators and the Government as one clearly based on coordinated, centralised planning principles; and Promote competition within the industry to drive continuous improvement in service delivery.
Funding
5
Some of the key limitations include: Only the NorthEast (Punggol/ Sengkang) and the North-West (Woodlands/Bukit Panjang) are integrated areas; The majority of SMRT stations rely on SBST bus services as feeder modes; and The model does not address bus/ bus integration issues across bus licence areas.
Under the current arrangements, all operating costs are recovered from system revenue (including passenger fares, property leases and advertising). In addition, system revenue funds all capital assets for bus services, such as bus eets and bus eet management systems. The Government, through the LTA, funds the infrastructure development of the RTS system and the rst set of operating assets. It is recommended that the principle of full recovery of operating costs should be retained, allowing government funds to support asset and system improvement. Maintaining operating cost
It is recognised that these improvements alone are not a panacea to the declining public transport mode share. A complete solution must also include managing the use of cars and ensuring all land use development is transit oriented. However, these considerations go beyond the scope of this study. Critical to the success of these reforms will be LTAs commitment to envision and implement a much improved and integrated public transport system. The reforms presented here provide the tools to implement the required improvements: what is built with these tools will determine the ultimate outcome.
100
101