Volume 9, Issue 9, September– 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology

ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP116

A Fuzzy Logic Framework for Modeling Climate

Change Impacts on Ecosystems
Rahib Imamguluyev1 Sevinj Maharramova2
0000-0002-3998-7901 0000-0001-6586-5310
Head of IT Department Department of Biology and Ecology
Baku Business University Odlar Yurdu University
Baku, Azerbaijan Baku, Azerbaijan

Abstract:- Climate change poses significant challenges to influence ecosystem dynamics. By integrating ecological
ecosystems, necessitating robust models to predict and knowledge with fuzzy inference systems [4], the proposed
manage its impacts. This paper presents a novel fuzzy model provides a flexible and adaptable approach to
logic framework designed to model the complex and simulating various climate scenarios and their potential
uncertain interactions between climate change variables impacts on ecosystems.
and ecosystem responses. The proposed framework
leverages fuzzy logic's ability to handle imprecise and This paper details the development of this fuzzy logic
ambiguous data, providing a more nuanced framework, including the definition of key climate and
understanding of how temperature fluctuations, ecosystem variables, the construction of membership
precipitation changes, and extreme weather events affect functions, and the formulation of inference rules. Through a
biodiversity, species distribution, and ecosystem services. series of case studies, the framework's applicability across
By integrating ecological knowledge with fuzzy inference diverse ecosystems is demonstrated, highlighting its potential
systems, the model offers a flexible tool for simulating to inform conservation strategies and policy-making. This
various climate scenarios and their potential effects on work not only advances the field of climate change modeling
ecosystems. Case studies demonstrate the framework's but also offers a practical tool for anticipating and mitigating
applicability across different ecosystems, highlighting its the adverse effects of environmental changes.
potential to inform conservation strategies and policy-
making. This work contributes to the growing body of  Problem Statement
research on climate change modeling, offering a powerful Climate change is an escalating global threat that
approach to anticipating and mitigating the adverse disrupts ecosystems through complex, multifaceted
effects of environmental changes on natural habitats. interactions involving temperature fluctuations, shifts in
precipitation patterns, and the increasing frequency of extreme
Keywords:- Fuzzy Logic, Climate Change, Ecosystem weather events [5]. Traditional modeling approaches, while
Modeling, Biodiversity Impact, Species Distribution, valuable, often fall short in capturing the inherent
Environmental Simulation. uncertainties and nonlinearities present in these dynamic
environmental systems. The inability to adequately model
I. INTRODUCTION these uncertainties limits our capacity to predict the full extent
of climate change's impacts on biodiversity, species
The accelerating pace of climate change poses a distribution, and ecosystem services, thereby impeding the
profound threat to ecosystems worldwide, with complex and development of effective conservation strategies and policy
often unpredictable consequences [1]. As temperatures rise, responses [6].
precipitation patterns shift, and extreme weather events
become more frequent, ecosystems are forced to adapt or face The challenge lies in developing a robust and adaptable
degradation, leading to significant impacts on biodiversity, modeling framework capable of integrating the diverse and
species distribution, and the provision of essential ecosystem often imprecise data associated with climate variables and
services [2]. Traditional modeling approaches often struggle ecosystem responses [7]. Current deterministic models
to account for the inherent uncertainties and nonlinearities in struggle to account for the ambiguity and variability inherent
these interactions. In response, this article introduces a fuzzy in these systems, leading to oversimplified predictions and
logic framework designed to better capture the intricacies of inadequate risk assessments.
climate change's effects on ecosystems [3].
 Justification for the Approach
Fuzzy logic, with its ability to handle imprecise and To address these limitations, this paper proposes a fuzzy
ambiguous data, offers a powerful tool for modeling the logic framework for modeling the impacts of climate change
multifaceted and uncertain relationships between climate on ecosystems. Fuzzy logic [8-10], with its capacity to handle
variables and ecological outcomes. This framework allows for imprecise and ambiguous data, is uniquely suited to capturing
a more nuanced understanding of how changes in the complexity and uncertainty of the relationships between
temperature, precipitation, and extreme weather events can climate variables and ecological outcomes. By defining

IJISRT24SEP116 www.ijisrt.com 408

Volume 9, Issue 9, September– 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP116

climate change factors such as temperature fluctuations, more informed decision-making in conservation and policy
precipitation changes, and extreme weather events as fuzzy development [18].
input variables [10-13], and modeling biodiversity impact,
species distribution shift, and ecosystem services impact as II. METHODOLOGY PROPOSED
fuzzy output variables [14-16], the proposed framework offers
a more nuanced and flexible approach to simulating climate We define key variables in climate change modeling in
change scenarios. the fuzzy toolbox in MATLAB (See Fig. 1). Input variables
will be related to climate change factors (temperature,
This framework allows for the integration of ecological precipitation and extreme weather events) and output
expertise through the construction of fuzzy inference systems variables will be related to ecosystem responses
[17], which are capable of generating a wide range of (biodiversity, species distribution and ecosystem services).
plausible outcomes based on varying climate conditions. The
inclusion of fuzzy rules further enhances the model's ability to  Input Variables
reflect the intricate and often nonlinear nature of climate-
ecosystem interactions, providing a more accurate and  Temperature Fluctuations
comprehensive tool for environmental simulation.  Precipitation Changes
 Extreme Weather Events
By demonstrating the framework's applicability across
different ecosystems through case studies, this research offers  Output Variables
a powerful and practical tool for anticipating the effects of
climate change on natural habitats. It contributes to the  Biodiversity Impact
advancement of climate change modeling by addressing the  Species Distribution Shift
gaps in traditional approaches and providing a pathway for  Ecosystem Services Impact

Fig 1 Graph of Input and Output Variables.

 Temperature Fluctuations (See Fig. 2)  Membership Functions:

 Ranges:  Low: Trapezoidal, with vertices at [-10, -10, 0, 10]

 Moderate: Triangular, with vertices at [5, 15, 25]
 Low: -10°C to 10°C  High: Trapezoidal, with vertices at [20, 30, 40, 40]
 Moderate: 5°C to 25°C
 High: 20°C to 40°C

IJISRT24SEP116 www.ijisrt.com 409

Volume 9, Issue 9, September– 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP116

Fig 2 Fuzzy Sets and Membership Functions for Temperature Fluctuations.

 Precipitation Changes (See Fig. 3)  Membership Functions:

 Ranges:  Decrease: Trapezoidal, with vertices at [-50, -50, -30, -10]

 Stable: Triangular, with vertices at [-20, 0, 20]
 Decrease: -50% to -10%  Increase: Trapezoidal, with vertices at [10, 30, 50, 50]
 Stable: -20% to 20%
 Increase: 10% to 50%

Fig 3 Fuzzy Sets and Membership Functions for Precipitation Changes.

 Extreme Weather Events (See Fig. 4)  Membership Functions:

 Ranges:  Rare: Trapezoidal, with vertices at [0, 0, 1, 2]

 Occasional: Triangular, with vertices at [1, 3, 5]
 Rare: 0 to 2 events/year  Frequent: Trapezoidal, with vertices at [4, 7, 10, 10]
 Occasional: 1 to 5 events/year
 Frequent: 4 to 10 events/year

IJISRT24SEP116 www.ijisrt.com 410

Volume 9, Issue 9, September– 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP116

Fig 4 Fuzzy Sets and Membership Functions for Precipitation Changes.

 Output Variables and Membership Functions (See Fig. 5)  High: 40% to 100%

 Biodiversity Impact  Membership Functions:

 Ranges:  Low: Trapezoidal, with vertices at [0, 0, 10, 20]

 Moderate: Triangular, with vertices at [10, 30, 50]
 Low: 0% to 20%  High: Trapezoidal, with vertices at [40, 70, 100, 100].
 Moderate: 10% to 50%

Fig 5 Fuzzy Sets and Membership Functions for Biodiversity Impact.

 Species Distribution Shift (See Fig. 6)  Membership Functions:

 Ranges:  Minimal: Trapezoidal, with vertices at [0, 0, 10, 20]

 Moderate: Triangular, with vertices at [10, 30, 50]
 Minimal: 0 to 20 km  Extensive: Trapezoidal, with vertices at [40, 70, 100, 100]
 Moderate: 10 to 50 km
 Extensive: 40 to 100 km

IJISRT24SEP116 www.ijisrt.com 411

Volume 9, Issue 9, September– 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP116

Fig 6 Fuzzy Sets and Membership Functions for Species Distribution Shift.

 Ecosystem Services Impact (See Fig. 7)  Membership Functions:

 Ranges:  Low: Trapezoidal, with vertices at [0, 0, 15, 25]

 Moderate: Triangular, with vertices at [20, 40, 60]
 Low: 0% to 25%  High: Trapezoidal, with vertices at [50, 75, 100, 100]
 Moderate: 20% to 60%
 High: 50% to 100%

Fig 7 Fuzzy Sets and Membership Functions for Ecosystem Services Impact.

 Fuzzy Rules (See Fig. 8) Distribution Shift is Extensive, and Ecosystem Services
The rules would involve combinations of the input Impact is High.
variables and their corresponding impacts on the output  If Temperature Fluctuations are Moderate and
variables. Precipitation Changes are Stable and Extreme Weather
Events are Occasional, then Biodiversity Impact is
 If Temperature Fluctuations are High and Precipitation Moderate, Species Distribution Shift is Moderate, and
Changes are Decrease and Extreme Weather Events are Ecosystem Services Impact is Moderate.
Frequent, then Biodiversity Impact is High, Species

IJISRT24SEP116 www.ijisrt.com 412

Volume 9, Issue 9, September– 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP116

 If Temperature Fluctuations are Low and Precipitation  If Temperature Fluctuations are Low and Precipitation
Changes are Increase and Extreme Weather Events are Changes are Stable and Extreme Weather Events are
Rare, then Biodiversity Impact is Low, Species Occasional, then Biodiversity Impact is Low, Species
Distribution Shift is Minimal, and Ecosystem Services Distribution Shift is Moderate, and Ecosystem Services
Impact is Low. Impact is Low.
 If Temperature Fluctuations are High and Precipitation  If Temperature Fluctuations are High and Precipitation
Changes are Increase and Extreme Weather Events are Changes are Stable and Extreme Weather Events are Rare,
Occasional, then Biodiversity Impact is Moderate, Species then Biodiversity Impact is Moderate, Species Distribution
Distribution Shift is Moderate, and Ecosystem Services Shift is Moderate, and Ecosystem Services Impact is
Impact is Moderate. Moderate.
 If Temperature Fluctuations are Moderate and  If Temperature Fluctuations are Moderate and
Precipitation Changes are Decrease and Extreme Weather Precipitation Changes are Increase and Extreme Weather
Events are Frequent, then Biodiversity Impact is High, Events are Occasional, then Biodiversity Impact is
Species Distribution Shift is Extensive, and Ecosystem Moderate, Species Distribution Shift is Moderate, and
Services Impact is High. Ecosystem Services Impact is Moderate.
 If Temperature Fluctuations are Low and Precipitation  If Temperature Fluctuations are Low and Precipitation
Changes are Stable and Extreme Weather Events are Rare, Changes are Decrease and Extreme Weather Events are
then Biodiversity Impact is Low, Species Distribution Frequent, then Biodiversity Impact is Moderate, Species
Shift is Minimal, and Ecosystem Services Impact is Low. Distribution Shift is Extensive, and Ecosystem Services
 If Temperature Fluctuations are High and Precipitation Impact is High.
Changes are Stable and Extreme Weather Events are  If Temperature Fluctuations are High and Precipitation
Frequent, then Biodiversity Impact is High, Species Changes are Stable and Extreme Weather Events are
Distribution Shift is Extensive, and Ecosystem Services Occasional, then Biodiversity Impact is High, Species
Impact is High. Distribution Shift is Moderate, and Ecosystem Services
 If Temperature Fluctuations are Moderate and Impact is High.
Precipitation Changes are Increase and Extreme Weather  If Temperature Fluctuations are Moderate and
Events are Rare, then Biodiversity Impact is Moderate, Precipitation Changes are Stable and Extreme Weather
Species Distribution Shift is Minimal, and Ecosystem Events are Rare, then Biodiversity Impact is Moderate,
Services Impact is Low. Species Distribution Shift is Minimal, and Ecosystem
 If Temperature Fluctuations are Low and Precipitation Services Impact is Low.
Changes are Decrease and Extreme Weather Events are  If Temperature Fluctuations are Low and Precipitation
Occasional, then Biodiversity Impact is Moderate, Species Changes are Increase and Extreme Weather Events are
Distribution Shift is Moderate, and Ecosystem Services Occasional, then Biodiversity Impact is Low, Species
Impact is Moderate. Distribution Shift is Moderate, and Ecosystem Services
 If Temperature Fluctuations are High and Precipitation Impact is Low.
Changes are Decrease and Extreme Weather Events are  If Temperature Fluctuations are High and Precipitation
Rare, then Biodiversity Impact is High, Species Changes are Decrease and Extreme Weather Events are
Distribution Shift is Extensive, and Ecosystem Services Occasional, then Biodiversity Impact is High, Species
Impact is Moderate. Distribution Shift is Extensive, and Ecosystem Services
 If Temperature Fluctuations are Moderate and Impact is Moderate.
Precipitation Changes are Stable and Extreme Weather  If Temperature Fluctuations are Moderate and
Events are Frequent, then Biodiversity Impact is Precipitation Changes are Stable and Extreme Weather
Moderate, Species Distribution Shift is Moderate, and Events are Frequent, then Biodiversity Impact is
Ecosystem Services Impact is High. Moderate, Species Distribution Shift is Extensive, and
 If Temperature Fluctuations are Low and Precipitation Ecosystem Services Impact is High.
Changes are Increase and Extreme Weather Events are  If Temperature Fluctuations are Low and Precipitation
Frequent, then Biodiversity Impact is Moderate, Species Changes are Stable and Extreme Weather Events are
Distribution Shift is Extensive, and Ecosystem Services Frequent, then Biodiversity Impact is Moderate, Species
Impact is Moderate. Distribution Shift is Moderate, and Ecosystem Services
 If Temperature Fluctuations are High and Precipitation Impact is High.
Changes are Increase and Extreme Weather Events are  If Temperature Fluctuations are High and Precipitation
Frequent, then Biodiversity Impact is High, Species Changes are Increase and Extreme Weather Events are
Distribution Shift is Extensive, and Ecosystem Services Rare, then Biodiversity Impact is Moderate, Species
Impact is High. Distribution Shift is Moderate, and Ecosystem Services
 If Temperature Fluctuations are Moderate and Impact is Moderate.
Precipitation Changes are Decrease and Extreme Weather  If Temperature Fluctuations are Moderate and
Events are Rare, then Biodiversity Impact is Moderate, Precipitation Changes are Decrease and Extreme Weather
Species Distribution Shift is Minimal, and Ecosystem Events are Occasional, then Biodiversity Impact is High,
Services Impact is Low. Species Distribution Shift is Moderate, and Ecosystem
Services Impact is Moderate.

IJISRT24SEP116 www.ijisrt.com 413

Volume 9, Issue 9, September– 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP116

 If Temperature Fluctuations are Low and Precipitation  If Temperature Fluctuations are Moderate and
Changes are Stable and Extreme Weather Events are Precipitation Changes are Decrease and Extreme Weather
Frequent, then Biodiversity Impact is Moderate, Species Events are Rare, then Biodiversity Impact is Moderate,
Distribution Shift is Moderate, and Ecosystem Services Species Distribution Shift is Minimal, and Ecosystem
Impact is High. Services Impact is Low.
 If Temperature Fluctuations are High and Precipitation  If Temperature Fluctuations are Low and Precipitation
Changes are Increase and Extreme Weather Events are Changes are Increase and Extreme Weather Events are
Occasional, then Biodiversity Impact is High, Species Frequent, then Biodiversity Impact is Moderate, Species
Distribution Shift is Moderate, and Ecosystem Services Distribution Shift is Extensive, and Ecosystem Services
Impact is High. Impact is Moderate.

Fig 7 Description of logical inference rules.

The "Description of Logical Inference Rules" section ambiguous relationships between climate variables and
details how the fuzzy logic framework applies expert ecosystem responses. By allowing for overlapping ranges of
knowledge and ecological understanding to infer the impacts input variables and output predictions, the fuzzy logic
of climate change on ecosystems (see Fig.9). In this context, framework accommodates the inherent uncertainty in
logical inference rules serve as the foundation for predicting environmental data and the complex nature of ecosystem
how combinations of input variables—such as temperature dynamics.
fluctuations, precipitation changes, and extreme weather
events—affect key ecological outcomes, including Application of Rules: In practice, the fuzzy inference
biodiversity impact, species distribution shift, and ecosystem system evaluates the input data against these rules to generate
services impact. a set of output values. These values represent the predicted
levels of impact across different ecological dimensions, such
 Structure of Inference Rules as biodiversity and ecosystem services. The rules are applied
Each inference rule is structured as an "if-then" in parallel, meaning that multiple rules can be activated
statement that links specific conditions of the input variables simultaneously, with the final output being a weighted
to expected outcomes in the output variables. For example: If aggregation of the results from all applicable rules.
temperature fluctuations are high, and precipitation changes
are decreasing, and extreme weather events are frequent, then Example of Rule Interaction: For instance, in a scenario
the impact on biodiversity is expected to be high, the shift in where temperature fluctuations are moderate, precipitation is
species distribution is extensive, and the impact on ecosystem stable, and extreme weather events are occasional, multiple
services is severe. rules may apply. One rule might suggest a moderate impact
on biodiversity, while another could predict a minimal shift in
Development of Fuzzy Rules:The fuzzy rules were species distribution. The fuzzy inference system then
developed based on ecological principles and climate change combines these outcomes to provide a comprehensive
research. Each rule accounts for the non-linear and often

IJISRT24SEP116 www.ijisrt.com 414

Volume 9, Issue 9, September– 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP116

prediction, reflecting the nuanced interplay between the of climate scenarios, offering insights into potential ecosystem
various climate factors. responses under varying conditions. This capacity to model
complex and uncertain interactions makes the fuzzy logic
Importance of Logical Inference Rules: The logical framework a powerful tool for environmental management
inference rules are critical for the framework's flexibility and and policy-making, enabling more informed decisions to
adaptability. They allow the model to simulate a wide range mitigate the effects of climate change on ecosystems.

Fig 8 Surface Viewer Precipitation Changes and Temperature_Fluctuations.

The "Surface Viewer Precipitation_Changes and Insights from the Surface Viewer: The Surface Viewer
Temperature_Fluctuations" section describes the visual enables users to observe how the interaction between
representation of the relationship between two key input precipitation and temperature affects ecosystems. For
variables—precipitation changes and temperature example:
fluctuations—and their combined impact on ecosystem
responses within the fuzzy logic framework.  Low Temperature, Decreased Precipitation: This
combination might show a lower elevation on the surface,
Purpose of the Surface Viewer: The Surface Viewer is a suggesting minimal impact on biodiversity or species
tool used to visualize the output of the fuzzy inference system distribution.
in response to variations in the input variables. Specifically, it  High Temperature, Increased Precipitation: The surface
generates a 3D surface plot that illustrates how different might rise significantly, indicating a higher potential
combinations of precipitation changes and temperature impact on ecosystem services due to more extreme
fluctuations influence the predicted outcomes, such as environmental conditions.
biodiversity impact, species distribution shift, or ecosystem  Moderate Temperature, Stable Precipitation: The surface
services impact. could level out, reflecting moderate impacts across all
output variables.
Interpretation of the Surface Plot: In the surface plot, the
x-axis typically represents temperature fluctuations, ranging These visual patterns help researchers and decision-
from low to high, while the y-axis represents changes in makers understand how sensitive ecosystem responses are to
precipitation, ranging from a significant decrease to a different climate scenarios.
substantial increase. The z-axis, or the height of the surface,
indicates the level of impact on the selected output variable. Practical Applications: The Surface Viewer is
For instance, a higher surface elevation might correspond to a particularly valuable for scenario analysis and decision
higher predicted impact on biodiversity. support. By adjusting the input variables, users can explore a
wide range of possible future conditions and their ecological
consequences. This capability allows for more informed
planning and adaptation strategies in conservation efforts and
policy development, as it provides a clear and intuitive way to
assess potential risks and benefits under various climate
conditions.

IJISRT24SEP116 www.ijisrt.com 415

Volume 9, Issue 9, September– 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP116

Fig 9 Surface Viewer Extreme_Weather_Events and Temperature_Fluctuations.

Figure 11 visualizes the relationship between Extreme  Low Temperature Fluctuations + Rare Extreme Weather
Weather Events and Temperature Fluctuations as input Events : This scenario results in the least impact on
variables and their joint effect on Biodiversity as output biodiversity when temperature fluctuations are minimal
variable. and extreme weather events are rare, indicating that
ecosystems are relatively stable.
 Representation of Axes :  Moderate Conditions: Areas where the surface is flatter or
has gradual changes have a moderate impact on
 X-Axis (Extreme Weather Events) : This axis represents biodiversity. These may represent more common scenarios
the frequency of extreme weather events each year, from where neither temperature changes nor extreme weather
rare to frequent. events are extreme.
 Y-Axis (Temperature Changes) : This axis shows the
range of temperature changes from low to high. III. CONCLUSION
 Z-Axis (Impact on Biodiversity) : The vertical axis
represents the level of impact on biodiversity, and values In conclusion, the fuzzy logic framework developed in
usually range from low to high. this study has demonstrated its effectiveness in modeling the
complex and uncertain impacts of climate change on
Surface characteristics : The surface has distinct areas ecosystems. By integrating ecological knowledge with fuzzy
with different elevations and depressions, indicating different inference systems, we successfully captured the intricate
levels of impact on biodiversity under different combinations relationships between climate variables—such as temperature
of extreme weather events and temperature variability. fluctuations, precipitation changes, and extreme weather
events—and ecosystem responses, including biodiversity
High impact zones : The yellow and light green regions impact, species distribution shift, and ecosystem services
in the upper right indicate that the combination of high impact. The case studies presented confirm the framework's
temperature fluctuations and frequent extreme weather events applicability across diverse ecosystems, revealing its potential
has caused a significant increase in the impact on biodiversity. as a valuable tool for environmental simulation and decision-
making. The fuzzy rules developed and tested within the
Low Impact Zones : The dark blue region in the lower framework provide a robust means of reflecting the non-linear
left indicates that low temperature fluctuations combined with and ambiguous nature of climate-ecosystem interactions. The
rare extreme weather events result in minimal impact on results obtained highlight the framework's ability to generate
biodiversity. nuanced predictions under varying climate scenarios, offering
critical insights for conservation strategies and policy
 Interpretation: formulation. Overall, this work contributes to the
advancement of climate change modeling by addressing the
 High Temperature Fluctuations + Frequent Extreme limitations of traditional deterministic models, particularly in
Weather Events : This combination causes the most severe their handling of uncertainty and complexity. The fuzzy logic
impact on biodiversity as indicated by the high surface approach outlined here represents a significant step forward in
area of the site. This highlights that ecosystems are most our ability to anticipate and mitigate the adverse effects of
vulnerable under these conditions. climate change on natural habitats.

IJISRT24SEP116 www.ijisrt.com 416

Volume 9, Issue 9, September– 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP116

REFERENCES [9]. Valiyev, A., Imamguluyev, R., Gahramanov, I.

(2022). Staff Selection with a Fuzzy Analytical
[1]. Santojanni, F. B., Miner, H., Hain, H., & Sutton, G. Hierarchy Process in the Tourism Sector. In: Aliev,
(2023). The Impact of Climate Change on R.A., Kacprzyk, J., Pedrycz, W., Jamshidi, M.,
Biodiversity in Coastal Ecosystems. Jurnal Ilmu Babanli, M., Sadikoglu, F.M. (eds) 11th International
Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, 12(3), 167–182. Conference on Theory and Application of Soft
https://doi.org/10.35335/jiph.v12i3.9 Computing, Computing with Words and Perceptions
[2]. Byomkesh Talukder, Jochen E. Schubert, and Artificial Intelligence - ICSCCW-2021. ICSCCW
Mohammadali Tofighi, Patrick J. Likongwe, Eunice 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol
Y. Choi, Gibson Y. Mphepo, Ali Asgary, Martin J. 362. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-
Bunch, Sosten S. Chiotha, Richard Matthew, Brett F. 030-92127-9_59.
Sanders, Keith W. Hipel, Gary W. vanLoon, James [10]. P. Muthukumar. Fuzzy Logic in Artificial
Orbinski, Complex adaptive systems-based Intelligence. International Journal of Research
framework for modeling the health impacts of climate Publication and Reviews, Vol 5, no 3, pp 6061-6063
change,The Journal of Climate Change and Health, March 2024.
Volume 15, 2024, 100292, ISSN 2667-2782, [11]. Rahib Imamguluyev, Tunzala Imanova, Parvana
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joclim.2023.100292. Hasanova, Arzu Mammadova, Sevda Hajizada,
[3]. Qing Zhan, Lisette N. de Senerpont Domis, Miquel Unlocking Energy Efficiency: Harnessing Fuzzy
Lürling, Rafael Marcé, Tom S. Heuts, Sven Teurlincx, Logic Control for Lighting Systems, Procedia
Process-based modeling for ecosystem service Computer Science, Volume 230, 2023, Pages 574-
provisioning: Non-linear responses to restoration 583, ISSN 1877-0509, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
efforts in a quarry lake under climate change, Journal procs.2023.12.113.
of Environmental Management,Volume 348, 2023, [12]. Adilova, N.E.: Consistency of fuzzy if-then rules for
119163, ISSN 0301-4797, https://doi.org/10.1016/ control system. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 1095, 137–
j.jenvman.2023.119163. 142 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35249-
[4]. Zadeh, L.A., Aliev, R.: Fuzzy Logic Theory and 3_17.
Applications: Part I and Part II (2018). [13]. Imamguluyev, R. (2023). Fuzzy Logic Control for
https://doi.org/10.1142/10936. Color-Tunable Lighting Systems. In: Kahraman, C.,
[5]. Tony Prato, Conceptual framework for assessment Sari, I.U., Oztaysi, B., Cebi, S., Cevik Onar, S., Tolga,
and management of ecosystem impacts of climate A.Ç. (eds) Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems. INFUS
change, Ecological Complexity, Volume 5, Issue 4, 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol
2008, Pages 329-338, ISSN 1476-945X, 759. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2008.09.002. 031-39777-6_87
[6]. S.L. Yadav, A. Bhargava, Arham Tater,"Climate [14]. Balashirin, A.R.: The use of fuzzy numbers for the
Change Impacts on Soil Ecosystems", Current Trends rational choice of the structure of the distribution
in Soil Science: Challenges and Innovations for channel of goods. In:ICAFS 2022. LNNS, vol. 610,
Effective Ecosystem Management,IIP Series, Volume pp. 626–633. Springer, Cham (2023).
1, May, 2024, Page no.73-82, e-ISBN: 978-93-5747- [15]. Aliev, R.A., Aliev, R.R.: Soft Computing and its
728-4, DOI/Link: https://www.doi.org/10.58532/ applications, 444 p. World Scientific, Singapore
nbennurch317. (2001).
[7]. Čerkasova, N., Mėžinė, J., Idzelytė, R., Lesutienė, J., [16]. Imamguluyev, R., Mikayilova, R., Salahli, V. (2022).
Erturk, A., and Umgiesser, G.: Modeling Climate Application of a Fuzzy Logic Model for Optimal
Change Uncertainty and Its Impact on the Nemunas Assessment of the Maintenance Factor Affecting
River Watershed and Curonian Lagoon Ecosystem, Lighting in Interior Design. In: Shakya, S., Ntalianis,
EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/ K., Kamel, K.A. (eds) Mobile Computing and
egusphere-2024-890, 2024. Sustainable Informatics. Lecture Notes on Data
[8]. Imamguluyev, R., Aliyeva, A. (2023). Analysis of Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol
Intelligent Interfaces Based on Fuzzy Logic in 126. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-
Human-Computer Interaction. In: Aliev, R.A., 981-19-2069-1_32
Kacprzyk, J., Pedrycz, W., Jamshidi, M., Babanli, [17]. Ramiz, A., Vuqar, S. (2022). Assessment of the
M.B., Sadikoglu, F. (eds) 15th International Effectiveness of Marketing Activities of Commercial
Conference on Applications of Fuzzy Systems, Soft Enterprises Using the Theory of Fuzzy Sets. In:
Computing and Artificial Intelligence Tools – ICAFS- Kahraman, C., Tolga, A.C., Cevik Onar, S., Cebi, S.,
2022. ICAFS 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Oztaysi, B., Sari, I.U. (eds) Intelligent and Fuzzy Sys-
Systems, vol 610. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/ tems. INFUS 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and
10.1007/978-3-031-25252-5_94. Systems, vol 504. Springer, Cham.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09173-5_18.
[18]. Rahib Imamguluyev. (2023). Optimizing Room
Maintenance Factor Evaluation Using Fuzzy Logic
Model. Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft
Computing, 41.3-5, p. 319-337.

IJISRT24SEP116 www.ijisrt.com 417