Behavioural Sciences Module 15
Behavioural Sciences Module 15
Behavioural Sciences Module 15
MODULE:
FUNDAMENTALS OF BEHAVIOR SCIENCES
UNIT:
MEDICAL PSYCHOLOGY
8. Learning Outcomes
Knowledge
Attitudes
9. Indicative content
This module introduces four areas of interest to nurse and para-medical students –
namely, health psychology, Sociology of health and illness, Civic Education,
Communication skills as applied to health and illness.
Health psychology
4
1.1.Introduction
Psychology touches all aspects of our lives. As society has become more
complex, psychology has assumed an increasingly important role in solving
human problems. Psychologists are concerned with an astonishing variety of
problems. What child- rearing practices produce happy and effective adults?
5
How can mental illness be prevented? What family and social conditions
contribute to alienation and aggression?
Other problems are more specific. What is the best way to break a drug habit?
Can men care for infants as ably as women can? Can one recall childhood
experiences in more detail under hypnosis? What effects does prolonged stress
have on the immune system and the likelihood of illness? How effective is
psychotherapy in the treatment of depression? Can learning be improved by the
use of drugs that facilitate neural transmission? Psychologists are working on
these and many other questions.
This belief that the corporeal and the physical bodies are one is
by no means new. Socrates introduced the Greeks to this idea in
several of his works, however for a time in the early modern
period, it was lost to Rene Descartes (also know as Cartesians)
belief of the two separate bodies. Only recently has this arcane
thought been reintroduced into medical schools across the
world.
BACKGROUND
9
Structuralism school
Functionalism school
Psychoanalysis school
Gestalt psychology
Behaviorism school
Humanistic school
PSYCHOANALYSIS
The Ego. Is that part of our personality that is in direct contact with the
world about us. The ego controls the Id. The ego is the rational,
common sense part of our personality.
Psycho-Sexual Development
(2) Observations have proved that, sexual urges were present from
birth onward (e.g erect penises in male infants).
21
The term psycho- sexual- means that sex is not just a physiological
process but has psychological implications.
(1) Sexual pleasure is not limited to activity that directly involves the
genial organs. There are also other areas of the body called
erogenous zones that when given appropriate stimulation produce
pleasurable sexual feelings for example, mucous membranes lining the
mouth, the anus, etc.
c. Oral Stage (O- 2 Yrs). Freud says infants sucks to get nourishment
and derive pleasure quality for infant and the mother. Sex then
according to Freud is first identified with the mouth rathe than the
genitals. Because of the pleasure derived, the child will suck any object.
When it grows teeth, the child will even bite and it may gain pleasure
from aggressive biting.
22
d. Anal Stages (2-4 Yrs). The child’s pleasure organ changes to anus
prominently. The child enjoys both expelling and retaining his feaces.
The anal activity also becomes a focus of interaction between parents
and the child; for example, though toilet training parents increases the
child’s sensitivity to this area (anus). To defecate properly may bring
rewards from parents, and not doing it well may be a way of expressing
hostility to them (parents). Over strictness by parents in this stage will
lead to hostility late run adult age. Don’t care attitude by parents will
lead to clumsiness like writing with feaces on toilet walls.
(4) Girls face penis envy. She lacks the boy’s source of pleasure
and therefore, become envious.
f. Latency Stage (5- 12 Yrs). This is the stage where the instincts
become controllable. The ego and the super- ego are now developed.
At this stage, parents ought to teach their children on moral values and
letting them know the repercussions of doing good and bad things.
BEHAVIORIM APPROACH.
Learning as conditioning
-Classical conditioning
-Operant conditioning
Conditioning is the simplest form of learning, concerned with stimuli
and responses. Though stimulus –response associations, we acquire
many behaviors. Classical conditioning
The term “Learning” is broader, referring to any change in behavior
resulting from experience, excluding maturation and physiological
adjustments.
24
Classical conditioning.
Our modern understanding of classical conditioning began with Ivan
Pavlov, a Russian physiologist interest in the study of gastric secretions.
In fact, he received a Nobel prize for his work on digestion. To study
salivation in live dog, Pavlov and his assistants made an incision in the
dog’s check and inserted rubber tubing, through which the saliva passed
into a glass container. Here it could be measured in a precise, objective
manner. When a meat was presented, the dog naturally salivated, and
then studies could be made of this process.
Pavlov called these learned reactions physic secretions to distinguish
them from the inborn physiological ones elicited by the meat itself. The
term classical means “in the established manner”. Hence classical
conditioning means the study of stimulus-response relationships in the
manner established by Ivan Pavlov.
The first step in the Pavlovian method is to ensure that the new stimulus
is neutral. It should not elicit the response in question, which in this case
25
HUMANISTIC APPROACH.
Person-centered therapy
psychologist Carl Rogers in the 1940s and 1950s. It is one of the most
widely used models in mental health and psychotherapy. The basic
elements of Rogerian therapy involve showing congruence
(genuineness), empathy, and unconditional positive regard toward a
client. Based on these elements the therapist creates a supportive, non-
judgmental environment in which the client is encouraged to reach their
full potential. [1]
Core concepts
Rogers (1957; 1959) stated [5] that there are six necessary and sufficient
conditions required for therapeutic change:
Conflict
Frustration.
Frustration is a feeling which a person experiences when he
is unable to satisfy his desires. It occurs when there is a block to a
goal. Frustration may also be taken to mean a barrier towards
achieving a goal. Human beings react differently to frustration.
1) Immediate Consequences.
Types of Motivation.
35
Modes of reinforcement
a. Continuous reinforcement
b. Intermittent reinforcement
36
The DSM III has dropped the category of Psychosomatic diseases, but
according to the DSM II classification it has listed 10 categories of
psycho-physiologic disorder:
1. Skin disorders
2. Muscoskeletal disorders
38
3. Respiratory disorders
4. Cardiovascular disorders
5. Genitourinary disorders
6. Endocrine disorders
7. Disorders of organ of special sense - Chronic conjunctivitis
8. Disorders of other types - Disturbances in the nervous system in
which emotional factors play a significant role, such as multiple
sclerosis.
Some people also use the term psychosomatic disorder when mental
factors cause physical symptoms , but where there is no physical disease.
For example, a chest pain may be caused by stress, and no physical
disease is can be found.
believes that it's all in the mind. The doctor will always attempt to treat
the physical illness with appropriate medical treatment if necessary. But
he will also be interested to understand more about the person who has
the illness. This will in turn help him and the patient to understand the
illness better. Sometimes psychotherapy or talking treatment can help.
Patients are given the opportunity and time to talk about their feelings
and emotions. This will help provide them with an insight into
themselves and help them understand their illness better.
CHAP.VI COURSEWORK
ASSOCIATED TERMINOLOGY:
ASSOCIATED TERMINOLOGY:
1. conditioning = learning
2. antecedent = a stimulus occuring "before" a response
3. reflexive = involuntary (e.g., involuntary responses cannot
be consciously stopped once they start)
4. innate = inborn
5. elicits = causes (to bring forth)
3. Operant (Instrumental) Conditioning -- connection of emitted
behavior and its consequences (reinforcement and punishment)
A hungry rat presses a bar in its cage and receives food. The food
is a positive condition for the hungry rat. The rat presses the bar
again, and again receives food. The rat's behavior of pressing the
bar is strengthened by the consequence of receiving food.
A rat presses a bar in its cage and receives a mild electrical shock
on its feet. The shock is a negative condition for the rat. The rat
presses the bar again and again receives a shock. The rat's
behavior of pressing the bar is weakened by the consequence of
receiving a shock.
ASSOCIATED TERMINOLOGY:
Behaviorists assume that the only things that are real (or at leastworth
studying) are the things we can see and observe. We cannot see the mind
,the id, or the
unconscious, but we can see how people act, react and behave. From
behavior we may be able to make inferences about the minds and the
brain,but they are not the primary focus of the investigation.
Early Theorists:
Pavlov (1849-1936)
For Pavlov, all behavior was reflexive. But how do such behaviors
differfrom the behavior commonly called "instinctive" ?
Instinctivebehavior is sometimes said to be motivated. The animal has to
be hungry, to besexually aroused, or to have nest-building hormones
before these kinds ofinstinctive behavior can occur. But Pavlov
concluded that there seems to be nobasis for distinguishing between
reflexes and what has commonly been thought ofas non reflexive
behavior. As a psychologist, Pavlov was concerned with thenervous
system, and specifically the cerebral cortex, not with any lawfulnessthat
he might find in behavior.
45
Watson ( 1878-1958)
It was Watson, more than Pavlov or any other one person, who
convincedpsychologists that the real explanation of behavior lay in the
nervous systemand that as soon as we understood the brain a little better,
most of themysteries would disappear. And, it was mainly because of
Watson that so manypsychologists came to believe that what they called
conditioning was soimportant. (Bolles)
Skinner (1904-1990)
Among the basic human needs at the base of MASLOW “S pyramid are
hunger and sexual motivation .
47
SEXUAL MOTIVATION
Surveys show that men and women differ in aspect of their sexual
motivations. From on evolutionary perspective ,women are highly selective in
mate selection and seek men with economic resources or treats predictive of
future earnings . Men seek women who are young and attractive attributes
that signal fertility. Men also seek women who are not promiscuous.
48
SOCIAL MOTIVES
People are not content merely to satisfy biological needs in addition there
are social motives for belongingness and esteem.
BELONGINGNESS MOTIVES
ESTEEM MOTIVES
2.SITUATIONIST CONCEPTION:
Behaviors and KARL MAX emphasizedon by saying :<it is not the human
conscious which determine their existence but rather his social existence determine
the conscious>
3.EMPIRST CONCEPTION: Means that the past events affect ones present and
the future behavior.
49
Thus SIGMOND FREUD said that OEDIP situation affect the human behavior
from the childhood to adulthood.and ADLER talked about inferiority situation
lived by the children naturally weak and dependant on adults which marks them
defininitively therefore certain conduct appears as compensation.
b.Central theory:This theory consider motivation not only a psychologist need but
also as an interne sensitive information and memory .
REWARD-BASED MOTIVATION
Out of necessity ,people work for money and other economic benefit such as vacation time ,sick
leave ,health insurance ,and retirement pensions.some of the rewards people get at work are not
50
monetorary but symbolic for example titles,large offices ,windows,and access to parking.The
most theory of worker motivation is VICTOR VROOMS (1964) expectary theory .According to
Vroom people are rational decision markers w ho analyse the beneficts and the costs of their
possible course of action.
Research has shown that people perform well when they are given specific goals and a clear
standard for success and failure than when they are simply told to “do you will be”
INTRINSIC MOTIVATION
Psychologist have pushed out a difference between two types of motivation “intrinsic
motivation” orginate within person out of interest challenges and sheer enjoyment. Extrinsic
motivation orginates in factors outside the person (reward,recognition).Research show that
although reward increases intrinsic motivation which becomes evident once the reward is not
longer available.Reward has this effect when it is seen as bribe,but it has the opposite when
presented as positive feedback.
EQUITY MOTIVATION
Equity theory maintain that people want reward to be linked in fair way to perform relatively to
others.Thus when people feel over paid, they work harder to restore equity. Feelings of
underpayment lead people to slack off.
After studying about motivation as the future medical professionals especially as the
ENVIRONMENT HEALTH CARE GIVERS we are going to take new vision emphasizing that
at the field we will not only sensitize people but also motivate them to follow the guidelines that
we will give them to protect our environment according to the knowledge and skills acquired in
medical psychology course.
51
Doctor-patient relationship.
The doctor-patient relationship is central to the practice of medicine and is essential for the
delivery of high-quality health care in the diagnosis and treatment of disease. The doctor-patient
relationship forms one of the foundations of contemporary medical ethics. Most medical schools
and universities teach medical students from the beginning, even before they set foot in hospitals,
to maintain a professional rapport with patients, uphold patients’ dignity, and respect their
privacy.
Importance
A patient must have confidence in the competence of their doctor and must feel that they can
confide in him or her. For most physicians, the establishment of good rapport with a patient is
important. This being said, some medical specialties, such as psychiatry and family medicine,
emphasize the doctor-patient relationship more than others, such as pathology or radiology.
The quality of the patient-physician relationship is important to both parties. The better the
relationship in terms of mutual respect, knowledge, trust, shared values and perspectives about
disease and life, and time available, the better will be the amount and quality of information
about the patient's disease transferred in both directions, enhancing accuracy of diagnosis and
increasing the patient's knowledge about the disease. Where such a relationship is poor the
physician's ability to make a full assessment is compromised and the patient is more likely to
52
distrust the diagnosis and proposed treatment, causing decreased compliance to actually follow
the medical advice. In these circumstances and also in cases where there is genuine divergence of
medical opinions, a second opinion from another physician may be sought or the patient may
choose to go to another doctor.
Issues
Physician superiority
The physician may be viewed as superior to the patient, because the physician has the knowledge
and credentials, and is most often the one that is on home ground.
The doctor-patient relationship is also complicated by the patient's suffering (patient derives
from the Latin patior, "suffer") and limited ability to relieve it on his/her own, potentially
resulting in a state of desperation and dependency on the physician.
A physician should at least be aware of these disparities in order to establish rapport and
optimize communication with the patient.
Benefiting or pleasing
A dilemma may arise in situations where what is the most efficient treatment (or avoidance of
treatment) is not the same as what the patient wants for various reasons. In such cases, the
physician may need to choose between the patient's physical health or other rather material
benefits on one hand and the doctor-patient relationship or other psychological or emotional
aspect on the other.
Formal or casual
There may be differences in opinion between the doctor and patient in how formal or casual the
doctor-patient relationship should be.
For instance, according to a Scottish study,[1] patients want to be addressed by their first name
more often than is currently the case. In this study, most of the patients either liked (223) or did
53
not mind (175) being called by their first names. Only 77 disliked it, most of who were aged over
65.[1] On the other hand, most patients don't want to call the doctor by his or her first name.[1]
Perspectives
The physician-patient relationship can be analyzed from the perspective of ethical concerns, in
terms of how well the goals of non-maleficence, beneficence, autonomy, and justice are
achieved. Many other values and ethical issues can be added to these. In different societies,
periods, and cultures, different values may be assigned different priorities. For example, in the
last 30 years medical care in the Western World has increasingly emphasized patient autonomy
in decision making.
The relationship and process can also be analyzed in terms of social power relationships (e.g., by
Michel Foucault), or economic transactions. Physicians have been accorded gradually higher
status and respect over the last century, and they have been entrusted with control of access to
prescription medicines as a public health measure. This represents a concentration of power and
carries both advantages and disadvantages to particular kinds of patients with particular kinds of
conditions. A further twist has occurred in the last 25 years as costs of medical care have risen,
and a third party (an insurance company or government agency) now often insists upon a share
of decision-making power for a variety of reasons, reducing freedom of choice of healthcare
providers and patients in many ways.
In some settings, e.g. the hospital ward, the patient-physician relationship is much more
complex, and many other people are involved when somebody is ill: relatives, neighbors, rescue
specialists, nurses, technical personnel, social workers and others.
54
Physician-Patient Relationship
Fiduciary derives from the Latin word for "confidence" or "trust". The bond of trust between the
patient and the physician is vital to the diagnostic and therapeutic process. It forms the basis for
the physician-patient relationship. In order for the physician to make accurate diagnoses and
provide optimal treatment recommendations, the patient must be able to communicate all
relevant information about an illness or injury. Physicians are obliged to refrain from divulging
confidential information. This duty is based on accepted codes of professional ethics which
recognize the special nature of these medical relationships.
The historical model for the physician-patient relationship involved patient dependence on the
physician's professional authority. Believing that the patient would benefit from the physician's
actions, a patient's preferences were generally overridden or ignored. For centuries, the concept
of physician beneficence allowed this paternalistic model to thrive.
During the second half of the twentieth century, the physician-patient relationship has evolved
towards shared decision making. This model respects the patient as an autonomous agent with a
right to hold views, to make choices, and to take actions based on personal values and beliefs.
Patients have been increasingly entitled to weigh the benefits and risks of alternative treatments,
including the alternative of no treatment, and to select the alternative that best promotes their
own values (for further discussion, see the topic page on Informed Consent).
55
Students may feel uncertain about their role in patient care. However, it is crucial for building
trust that you begin this relationship in an honest and straightforward manner. A critical part of
this is being honest about your role and letting the patient know you are a physician-in-training.
In some settings, an attending physician or resident can introduce the student to initiate a trusting
relationship. In other settings, students may need to introduce themselves. One form of
introduction would be "Hello, I am Mary Jones. I'm a third year medical student who is part of
the team that will be caring for you during your hospitalization. I'd like to hear about what
brought you into the hospital." (For further discussion of this issue, see the Student Issues topic
page.)
Many patients will feel quite close to the student on the team. Students usually have more time to
spend with a patient, listening to the patient's history and health concerns, and patients certainly
notice and appreciate this extra attention.
Many patients appreciate a physician who brings a personal touch to the physician-patient
encounter. They may feel more connected to a physician whose extracurricular activities and
interests make her seem more alive. Physicians choose to share parts of their life stories
according to their level of comfort. However, it is essential that the patient, and the patient's
concerns, be the focus of every visit.
What role should the physician's personal feelings and beliefs play in the
physician-patient relationship?
Occasionally, a physician may face requests for services, such as contraception or abortion,
which raise a conflict for the physician. Physicians do not have to provide medical services in
opposition to their personal beliefs. In addition, it is acceptable to have a nonjudgmental
discussion with a patient regarding her need for the service, and to ensure that the patient
understands alternative forms of therapy. However, it is never appropriate to proselytize. While
56
the physician may decline to provide the requested service, the patient must be treated as a
respected, autonomous individual. Where appropriate, the patient should be provided with
resources about how to obtain the desired service.
ETHICS IN MEDICINE.
Informed Consent.
Opportunities to "consent" a patient abound on the wards. The aim of this section is to provide
you with the tools required for the "basic minimum" as well as providing a more complete
picture of the ideal informed consent process. You will find that the particular
circumstances (e.g. the patient's needs or the procedure) will determine whether a basic or
complete informed consent process is necessary. (See also Informed Consent in the OR.)
Informed consent is the process by which a fully informed patient can participate in choices
about her health care. It originates from the legal and ethical right the patient has to direct
57
what happens to her body and from the ethical duty of the physician to involve the patient in
her health care.
The most important goal of informed consent is that the patient have an opportunity to be an
informed participant in his health care decisions. It is generally accepted that complete
informed consent includes a discussion of the following elements:
In order for the patient's consent to be valid, he must be considered competent to make the
decision at hand and his consent must be voluntary. It is easy for coercive situations to arise in
medicine. Patients often feel powerless and vulnerable. To encourage voluntariness, the
physician can make clear to the patient that he is participating in a decision, not merely signing a
form. With this understanding, the informed consent process should be seen as an invitation to
him to participate in his health care decisions. The physician is also generally obligated to
provide a recommendation and share her reasoning process with the patient. Comprehension on
the part of the patient is equally as important as the information provided. Consequently, the
discussion should be carried on in layperson's terms and the patient's understanding should be
assessed along the way.
Basic consent entails letting the patient know what you would like to do and asking them if that
will be all right. Basic consent is appropriate, for example, when drawing blood. Decisions that
merit this sort of basic informed consent process require a low-level of patient involvement
because there is a high-level of community consensus.
58
How do you know when you have said enough about a certain decision? Most of the literature
and law in this area suggest one of three approaches:
reasonable physician standard: what would a typical physician say about this
intervention? This standard allows the physician to determine what information is
appropriate to disclose. However, it is probably not enough, since most research in this
area shows that the typical physician tells the patient very little. This standard is also
generally considered inconsistent with the goals of informed consent as the focus is on
the physician rather than on what the patient needs to know.
reasonable patient standard: what would the average patient need to know in order to
be an informed participant in the decision? This standard focuses on considering what a
patient would need to know in order to understand the decision at hand.
subjective standard: what would this patient need to know and understand in order to
make an informed decision? This standard is the most challenging to incorporate into
practice, since it requires tailoring information to each patient.
Most states have legislation or legal cases that determine the required standard for informed
consent. In the state of Washington, we use the "reasonable patient standard." The best approach
to the question of how much information is enough is one that meets both your professional
obligation to provide the best care and respects the patient as a person with the right to a voice in
health care decisions. (See also Truth-Telling and Law and Medicine.)
Most health care institutions, including UWMC, Harborview, and VAMC have policies that state
which health interventions require a signed consent form. For example, surgery, anesthesia,
and other invasive procedures are usually in this category. These signed forms are really the
culmination of a dialogue required to foster the patient's informed participation in the clinical
decision.
59
For a wide range of decisions, written consent is neither required or needed, but some
meaningful discussion is needed. For instance, a man contemplating having a prostate-specific
antigen screen for prostate cancer should know the relevant arguments for and against this
screening test, discussed in layman's terms. (See also Research Ethics.)
In most cases, it is clear whether or not patients are competent to make their own decisions.
Occasionally, it is not so clear. Patients are under an unusual amount of stress during illness and
can experience anxiety, fear, and depression. The stress associated with illness should not
necessarily preclude one from participating in one's own care. However, precautions should be
taken to ensure the patient does have the capacity to make good decisions. There are several
different standards of decision making capacity. Generally you should assess the patient's
ability to:
When this is unclear, a psychiatric consultation can be helpful. Of course, just because a patient
refuses a treatment does not in itself mean the patient is incompetent. Competent patients have
the right to refuse treatment, even those treatments that may be life-saving. Treatment refusal
may, however, be a flag to pursue further the patient's beliefs and understanding about the
decision, as well as your own.
What about the patient whose decision making capacity varies from day to day?
Patients can move in and out of a coherent state as their medications or underlying disease
processes ebb and flow. You should do what you can to catch a patient in a lucid state - even
lightening up on the medications if necessary - in order to include him in the decision making
process.
60
The patient's consent should only be "presumed", rather than obtained, in emergency situations
when the patient is unconscious or incompetent and no surrogate decision maker is available. In
general, the patient's presence in the hospital ward, ICU or clinic does not represent implied
consent to all treatment and procedures. The patient's wishes and values may be quite different
than the values of the physician's. While the principle of respect for person obligates you to do
your best to include the patient in the health care decisions that affect his life and body, the
principle of beneficence may require you to act on the patient's behalf when his life is at stake.
Professionalism
Because medicine is a profession and physicians are professionals, it is important to have a clear
understanding of what "professionalism" means. As a physician-in-training, you will be
developing a personal sense of what it means to be a professional. This topic page outlines some
common features. Please see the topic page on the Physician-Patient Relationship for further
discussion of the professional responsibilities of physicians.
The words "profession" and "professional" come from the Latin word "professio," which means
a public declaration with the force of a promise. Professions are groups which declare in a public
way that their members promise to in certain ways and that the group and the society may
discipline those who fail to do so. The profession presents itself to society as a social benefit and
society accepts the profession, expecting it to serve some important social goal. The profession
usually issues a code of ethics stating the standards by which its members can be judged. The
traditional professions are medicine, law, education and clergy.
3. the right to train, admit, discipline and dismiss its members for failure to sustain
competence or observe the duties and responsibilities.
The line between a business and a profession is not entirely clear, since professionals may
engage in business and make a living by it. However, one crucial difference distinguishes them:
professionals have a fiduciary duty toward those they serve. This means that professionals have a
particularly stringent duty to assure that their decisions and actions serve the welfare of their
patients or clients, even at some cost to themselves. Professions have codes of ethics which
62
specify the obligations arising from this fiduciary duty. Ethical problems often occur when there
appears to be a conflict between these obligations or between fiduciary duties and personal goals.
Professionalism requires that the practitioner strive for excellence in the following areas which
should be modeled by mentors and teachers and become part of the attitudes, behaviors, and
skills integral to patient care:
Altruism: A physician is obligated to attend to the best interest of patients, rather than
self-interest.
Accountability: Physicians are accountable to their patients, to society on issues of
public health, and to their profession.
Duty: A physician should be available and responsive when "on call," accepting a
commitment to service within the profession and the community.
Honor and integrity: Physicians should be committed to being fair, truthful and
straightforward in their interactions with patients and the profession.
Respect for others: A physician should demonstrate respect for patients and their
families, other physicians and team members, medical students, residents and fellows.
These values should provide guidance for promoting professional behavior and for making
difficult ethical decisions.
A Physician Charter. Medical Professionalism in the New Millenium was issued jointly by the
The American Board of Internal Medicine, the American College of Physicians and the
European Federation of Internal Medicine in 2002. Subsequently, 90 professional associations,
including most of the specialty and subspecialty groups in American medicine have endorsed the
Charter. The fundamental principles of professionalism are stated as (1) the primacy of patient
welfare; (2) patient autonomy; (3) social justice. Professional responsibilities that follow from
63
There may be many barriers to effective physician-patient communication. Patients may feel that
they are wasting the physician's valuable time; omit details of their history which they deem
unimportant; be embarrassed to mention things they think will place them in an unfavorable
light; not understand medical terminology; or believe the physician has not really listened and,
therefore, does not have the information needed to make good treatment decisions.
Several approaches can be used to facilitate open communication with a patient. Physicians
should:
sit down
attend to patient comfort
One third to one half of patients will fail to follow a physician's treatment recommendations.
Labeling such patients "noncompliant" implicitly supports an attitude of paternalism, in which
the physician knows best. Patients filter physician instructions through their existing belief
system; they decide whether the recommended actions are possible or desirable in the context of
their everyday lives.
Compliance can be improved by using shared decision making. For example, physicians can say,
"I know it will be hard to stay in bed for the remainder of your pregnancy. Let's talk about what
problems it will create and try to solve them together." Or, "I can give you a medication to help
with your symptoms, but I also suspect the symptoms will go away if you wait a little longer.
Would you prefer to try the medication, or to wait?" Or, "I understand that you are not ready to
consider counseling yet. Would you be willing to take this information and find out when the
next support group meets?" Or, "Sometimes it's difficult to take medications, even though you
know they are important. What will make it hard for you to take this medication?"
Competent patients have a right to refuse medical intervention. Dilemmas may arise when a
patient refuses medical intervention, but does not withdraw from the role of being a patient. For
instance, an intrapartum patient, with a complete placenta previa, who refuses to undergo a
66
cesarean delivery, often does not present the option for the physician to withdraw from
participation in her care (see the Maternal/Fetal Conflict topic page). In most cases, choices of
competent patients must be respected when the patient cannot be persuaded to change them.
Physicians will sometimes encounter a patient whose needs, or demands, strain the therapeutic
alliance. Many times, an honest discussion with the patient about the boundaries of the
relationship will resolve such misunderstandings. The physician can initiate a discussion by
saying, "I see that you have a long list of health concerns. Unfortunately, our appointment today
is only for fifteen minutes. Let's discuss your most urgent problem today and reschedule you for
a longer appointment. That way, we can be sure to address everything on your list." Or, "I know
that it has been hard to schedule this appointment with me, but using abusive language with the
staff is not acceptable. What do you think we could do to meet everybody's needs?"
There may be occasions when no agreeable compromise can be reached between the physician
and the patient. And yet, physicians may not abandon patients. When the physician-patient
relationship must be severed, the physician is obliged to provide the patient with resources to
locate ongoing medical care.
Under certain conditions, a physician should strongly encourage specific actions. When there is a
high likelihood of harm without therapy, and treatment carries little risk, the physician should
attempt, without coercion or manipulation, to persuade the patient of the harmful nature of
choosing to avoid treatment.
Court orders may be invoked to override a patient's preferences. However, such disregard for the
patient's right to noninterference is rarely indicated. Court orders may have a role in the case of a
minor; during pregnancy; if harm is threatened towards oneself or others; with concern for
mental incompetence; or when the patient is a sole surviving parent of dependent children.
However, the use of such compulsory powers is inherently time-limited, and often alienates the
patient, making him less likely to comply once he is no longer subject to the sanctions.
Legal obligations to break confidentiality may pose difficult choices. While the physician has a
moral obligation to obey the law, he must balance this against his responsibility to the patient. It
is essential to balance the duty to protect the patient's confidence against the physician's
responsibility to the members of the public at risk. (For a discussion on the limits of
confidentiality, see the topic page on Confidentiality.)
67
Confidentiality provides the foundation for the physician-patient relationship. In order to make
accurate diagnoses and provide optimal treatment recommendations, the physician must have
relevant information about the patient's illness or injury. This may require the discussion of
sensitive information, which would be embarrassing or harmful if it were known to other
persons. The promise of confidentiality permits the patient to trust that information revealed to
the physician will not be further disseminated. The expectation of confidentiality derives from
the public oath which the physician has taken, and from the accepted code of professional ethics.
The physician's duty to maintain confidentiality extends from respect for the patient's autonomy.
Physicians with relationships with multiple family members must honor each individual's
confidentiality. Difficult issues, such as domestic violence, sometimes challenge physicians to
maintain impartiality. In many instances, physicians can help conflicted families towards
healing. At times, physicians work with individual family members; other times, they may serve
as a facilitator for a larger group. As always, when a risk for imminent harm is identified, the
physician must break confidentiality.
Physicians can be proactive about addressing the needs of changing family relationships. For
example, a physician might tell a preteen and her family, "Soon you'll be a teenager. Sometimes
teens have questions they would like to discuss with me. If that happens to you, it's okay to tell
your parents that you'd like an appointment. You and I won't have to tell your parents what we
talk about if you don't want to, but sometimes I might encourage you to talk things over with
them."
The physician-family relationship also holds considerable healing power. The potential exists to
pursue options that can improve the quality of life and health for the entire family.
Confidentiality is one of the core tenets of medical practice. Yet daily physicians face
challenges to this long-standing obligation to keep all information between physician and patient
private.
by respecting patient privacy can encourage the patient to be as honest as possible during the course of
the visit. (See also Physician-Patient Relationship.)
Exception 1:
On the one hand, the 1974 Federal Privacy Act restricts access to medical information and records. On
the other, clinicians have a duty to protect identifiable individuals from any serious threat of harm if
they have information that could prevent the harm. As mentioned above, the determining factor in
justifying breaking confidentiality is whether there is good reason to believe specific individuals (or
groups) are placed in serious danger depending on the medical information at hand. The most famous
case of this sort of exception is that of homicidal ideation, when the patient shares a specific plan with a
physician or psychotherapist to harm a particular individual. The court has required that traditional
patient confidentiality be breached in these sorts of cases.
69
Exception 2:
In the most clear cut cases of limited confidentiality, you are required by state law to report certain
communicable/infectious diseases to the public health authorities. In these cases, the duty to protect
public health outweighs the duty to maintain a patient's confidence. From a legal perspective, the State
has an interest in protecting public health that outweighs individual liberties in certain cases. In
particular, reportable diseases in Washington State include (but are not limited to): AIDS and Class IV
HIV, hepatitis A and B, measles, rabies, tetanus, and tuberculosis. Suspected cases of child, dependent
adult, and elder abuse are reportable, as are gunshot wounds. Local municipal code and institutional
policies can vary regarding what is reportable and standards of evidence required. It is best to clarify
institutional policy when arriving at a new site.
While there may be cases where the physician feels compelled to share information regarding the
patient's health and prognosis with, for instance, the patient's inquiring spouse, without explicit
permission from the patient it is generally unjustifiable to do so. Except in cases where the
spouse is at specific risk of harm directly related to the diagnosis, it remains the patient's, rather
than the physician's, obligation to inform the spouse.
The nurse patient relationship, according to research by Press Ganey Associates Inc., sets
the tone of the care experience and has a powerful impact on patient satisfaction. Nurses
spend the most time with patients. Patients see nurses’ interactions with others on the care
team and draw conclusions about the hospital based on their observations. Also, nurses’
attitudes toward their work, their coworkers and the organization affect patient and family
judgments of all the things they don’t see behind the scenes.
70
Without a positive nurse patient relationship, there cannot be patient and family
satisfaction. And there cannot be an environment that supports anxiety reduction and
healing.
By analyzing and understanding the factors that have the greatest impact on overall patient
satisfaction, you can AIM. You can focus your efforts and resources on improvements with
the greatest potential to enhance the patient experience.
On the CAHPS survey, there are two global items: “Overall rating of hospital” and “likelihood
of recommending hospital.” Based on 2007 CAHPS and Press Ganey Survey data, Press
Ganey identified “Nurse Communication” as the factor with the greatest impact on patients’
overall ratings of their hospital experience. Survey items that focus on the nurse patient
relationship drive patient ratings of their overall experience. Quality of communication in
nursing also has the highest impact on patients’ likelihood to recommend the hospital.
To hear Wendy speak about Communicating with Empathy, click the play button
below.
Patients and families want much more from nurses than competent clinical care.
Patients and families count on nurses to keep them informed, to connect them to their
physicians and other caregivers, to listen to them, to ease their anxiety, and to protect and
watch over them during their healthcare experience. Because of these high expectations of
71
nurses, itís no wonder that nursing performance, and more specifically, the nurse patient
relationship, is so central to patient satisfaction and a quality patient experience. Click
here for a poster that makes this point.
Yet, in strategies to achieve service excellence, while some nurses are enthusiastic,
committed and supportive, many express concerns and resistance.
Some nurses feel insulted. They think, ìIím a nursing professional! Iím with
people when theyíre sick and dying, and now Iím being told to smile more?!?î Or
they feel judged, ìHow dare anyone imply that I donít care!?!î
Some nurses feel resentful. They think, ìWhen this organization removes the
obstacles that make my life difficult, Iíll smile more!î
And other nurses feel cynical. They think, ìThis IS important, but it wonít stick.
This too shall pass like other things weíve tried to do here.î
Cynical nurses who are very dedicated to patients and families sound their
frustration over past initiatives that raised their hopes but then fizzled due to lack of
follow-through by the organizationís leaders.
See Wendy Leebovís article in American Nurse Today that makes the case and defines a
much more relevant goal for nurses ña goal that reduces possible resistance significantly.
We need to help nurses communicate expertly and connect at a personal and emotional
level in ways that do not take more of their timeótime that they donít have.
Leaders also need to run interference. They need to remove the barriers and create the
conditions that make it possible for nurses to serve their patients and families with diligent
and compassionate care.
And finally, to engage nursesí hearts and minds in strengthening their communication with
patients and families, leaders need to ensure follow-up and follow-through. Quick fix
approaches might be compelling but not sustainable. Strengthening nursesí skills and the
hard work of supporting APPLICATION of these skills to the nurse patient relationship in
their everyday work requires a long-term investment of time and energyÖ or cynicism is the
predictable result.
Nurses care, but patients and families may not FEEL their caring.
Nurses are so swamped. Their multiple responsibilities breed task-orientation, not people-
72
orientation. Then, seeing nurses focus on the tasks and activities of their jobs, patients and
families wonder, ìWhere has all the caring gone?î
The caring is still there, but it might as well not be if patients and families donít see or feel
it. Thatís why thereís a crying need today to help nurses speak the language of caring so
that their caring reaches the people they serve. In everyday routines, there are so many
opportunities to make their caring felt and ease their patientsí anxiety. For instance, when
one nurseís shift is ending and another nurse is taking over the patientís care, the first
nurse can ease the transition for the patient by speaking the language of caring during this
important handoff.
Caring is often the measure by which patients evaluate their ìcure-dominatedî experience.
Dr. Jean Watson also said, ìCaring is transpersonal in nature, involving the one caring as
well as the one being cared for.î With nurses so fraught with multiple demands and
pressures, many lose touch with their caring mission. This is a sad shame. It leads to
fatigue and disillusionment. Some remain in the job and these effects show in their
relationships (or lack of relationships) with patients, families and coworkers. Others leave in
a cloud of cynicism and grief that may be personally damaging to the nurse and also
discouraging to future prospects for nursing careers.
Nurse Managers (also fraught with an overload of responsibilities) need to adopt as a central
priority helping their nurses rekindle and sustain their passion for the workÖ. Ask these
Three Appreciative Questions to focus your nurses on their contributions.
Services That Enhance the Nurse Patient Relationship by Wendy Leebov and
Associates will help your nurses:
Renew their sense of caring mission and help them sustain their passion for the work
Speak the language of caring in the full range of emotionally demanding situations
they handle daily
Score highly on patient satisfaction survey items that focus on communication in the
nurse patient relationship and correlate highly with patient ratings of their overall
experience with your organization.
Compare and contrast the following statements: ‘Non-adherence [to medication] should not be
considered the patient’s problem’; and ‘You [the patient] should follow the course of treatment which
you have agreed.’
The two are not mutually exclusive but they reflect a tension at the heart of modern health care
and, therefore, nursing practice.
The first is from the latest NICE guidance on medicines adherence, the second from the newly
minted NHS Constitution.
Both documents promote ‘patient-centred care’ – in which treatment must be responsive to the
needs of the individual. Both set their face against the ‘doctor (or nurse) knows best’ approach of
the past.
However, the NHS Constitution makes a point of balancing patients’ rights with their
responsibilities, whereas the NICE guidance talks exclusively about what the service must do for
the patient. It recommends ‘an open, no-blame approach to patients to discuss any doubts or
concerns about treatment’.
This is the crux of the matter. Can you equate ‘blaming’ a patient with reminding them of a
‘responsibility’ to follow a
course of prescribed medication? Well, of course, that depends on how it is done.
Both the NICE guidance and the NHS Constitution stress the importance of good communication
between healthcare professionals and patients. Chief Nursing Officer for England Dame
Christine Beasley often speaks of nurses learning to become good ‘junior partners’ with patients
in the planning and delivery of care.
A nurse who has built a good relationship with a patient by informing and empowering them
will be in a strong position to have a non-judgemental conversation with them about the
importance of adherence.
Between the paternalistic poles of ‘be thankful for what you get’ and ‘we can’t expect the poor
dears to remember to take their pills’ lies a path to patient-centred care which nurses can help
blaze.
74