E.T.M - Testing
E.T.M - Testing
E.T.M - Testing
MINISTERY OF EDUCATION
ENGLISH TEACHING
METHODOLOGY SOLO WORK
THEME: TESTING
Teacher
Moisés André Gouveia
Uíge/June/2022
Introduction
English has become the main means of communication between people who
have no common language. In Angola for instance, the need to communicate in English
has increased incredibly and year after year the number of student wanting to learn
English has dramatically increased. This means that as educators and teachers that we
are, we cannot close our eyes to this situation.
Then, we all have an important role to play in order to provide student with at
least the very basic language needed to carry out simple communication either oral or
written. However, we have to provide a basic language, we also have to be aware of
testing, because there is a strong relationship between teaching and testing. In the
present work I will be focusing on testing.
Reasons for testing
During the learning, students may need or want to be tested on their ability in the
English language. A teacher might have several purpose to test the learners. He/she
might test to find out not only what students know, but also what they don’t know, to
see how students are getting on with the lessons, and how well they have assimilated
what they have been taught over the last week, two weeks or a month, to see how well
students have learnt everything...
Types of tests
When designing tests, we can either write discrete items, or ask students to
become involved in more integrative language use. Discrete-item testing means only
testing one thing at a time (e.g. testing a verb tense or a word), whereas integrative
testing means asking students to use a variety of language and skills to complete a task
successfully. A further distinction needs to be made between direct and indirect test
items. A direct test item is one that asks students to do something with language (e.g.
write a letter, read and reply to a newspaper article or take part in a conversation).
Indirect test items are those which test the students’ knowledge of language rather than
getting them to use it.
Indirect test items
There are many different ways of testing the students’ knowledge of language
construction. We will look at three of the most common.
Multiple choice: multiple-choice questions are those where students are given
alternatives to choose from, sometimes students are instructed to choose the ‘correct’
answer (because only one answer is possible), as in the example below.
But sometimes, instead, they can be told to choose the ‘best’ answer (because,
although more than one answer is possible, one stands out as the most appropriate), e.g.
One problem with multiple-choice questions, leads some people to find them
unattractive, since training students to be good at multiple-choice questions may not
help them to become better language learners. And there is a limit to how much we can
test with this kind of indirect item. Nevertheless, multiple-choice questions are very
attractive in terms of scorer reliability.
Fill-in and cloze: this extremely common form of indirect testing involves the
examinee writing a word in a gap in a sentence or paragraph, e.g.
Rewrite the sentence so that it means the same. Use the word in bold
Could I borrow five pounds, please?
lend_______________________
In order to complete the item successfully, the students not only have to know
the meaning of borrow and lend, but also how to use them in grammatical
constructions.
A variation of this technique is designed to focus more exactly on word grammar. Here,
students have to complete lines in a text using the correct form of a given word, e.g.
Reading and listening: some reading and writing test items look a bit like
indirect items (e.g. when students are given multiple-choice questions about a particular
word in a text, for example, or have to answer T/F questions about a particular
sentence). But at other times we might ask students to choose the best summary of what
they have heard or read. Many reading and listening tests are a blend of direct and
indirect testing. We can ask students direct language - or text-focused - questions as
well as testing their global understanding.
Writing: direct tests of writing might include getting students to write leaflets
based on information supplied in an accompanying text, or having them write
compositions, such as narrative and discursive essays. We can ask students to write
‘transactional letters’ (that is letters replying to an advertisement, or something they
have read in the paper, etc.). In transactional writing we expect students to include and
refer to information they are given.
Speaking: We can interview students, or we can put them in pairs and ask them
to perform a number of tasks. These might include having them discuss the similarities
and differences between two pictures, they might discuss how to furnish a room, or talk
about any other topic we select for them. We can ask them to role play certain
situations, such as buying a ticket or asking for information in a shop, or we might ask
them to talk about a picture we show them.
When designing direct test items for our students, we need to remember two
crucial facts. The first is that, as with indirect tests, direct tests should have items which
look like the kind of tasks students have been practicing in their lessons. In other words,
there is no point in giving students tasks which, because they are unfamiliar, confuse
them. The result of this will be that students cannot demonstrate properly how well they
can use the language, and this will make the test worthless.
Direct test items are much more difficult to mark than indirect items. This is
because our response to a piece of writing or speaking will almost certainly be very
subjective unless we do something to modify this subjectivity. We will now go on to
look at how this can be done.
Test, Assessment and Evaluation
These words are often confused by people. Test, Assessment and Evaluation are
different things, although they can all refer to the same activity.
In language teaching programs, a test is the formal activity normally carried out
by teacher at the end of a term or during it to check students' ability in what was taught.
This activity should not be confused with assessment or evaluation, which are different
constructs.
Evaluation is related to decisions to be made about the quality of the program
itself, and decisions about individuals in the program.
Assessment has to do with student through the learning process, that is, how well
there are etc. whereas evaluation has to do with checking the materials and programs
used to make the learning process happen. In other words, assessment corresponds to
learner performance, and evaluation corresponds to innovation or change in, for
example, school organization or a course syllabus.
2° preliminaries
Teacher's Name
Period
Grade
Class
Date
Simester
Subject
School curse/ cycle
Type testing
Addressee
3° Content
Cite only the topics you had spoken during the three semester, mainly those who had
succeeded in term of learning process.
4° Competency
Choose the competency you want work with on the testing, from the first testing till
now you have to know what is the weak part if your student.
5° Quotation
The teacher must choose the quotation if is 10 or 20 value.
The teacher must say what is necessary to do the test, what kind of school object the
student will use.
Conclusion
In this work, I tried to summarized about testing. I talk about:
Reasons for testing, where we could see that a teacher might have several
purpose to test the learners. Might test to find out not only what students know, but also
what they don’t know, to see how students are getting on with the lessons, and how well
they have assimilated what they have been taught over the last week, two weeks or a
month, to see how well students have learnt everything...
Types of testing, where we could see that there is Indirect test items, which includes
Multiple-choice questions, Fill-in and cloze and Transformation. And Direct test items,
which includes Reading and listening, Writing and Speaking.