Jurnal Didaktik Matematika Author 1 & Author 2

ISSN 2355-4185(p), 2548-8546(e)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v!i!.xxxxx

Title of Article (Times New Roman, 14, Bold, Center)

Name of Author11, Name of Author22 (Times New Roman, 12, Bold, Center)
1
Affiliation of Author1
2
Affiliation of Author2
Email: author@email (Corresponding Author)

Received: day-month-year; Revised: day-month-year; Accepted: day-month-year

Abstract. Abstract must be in English, using Times New Roman, 10pt, Italic, a single
paragraph, and between 150 and 200 words. The abstract must include the background,
objective, research methods (design, subject/sample, instruments, data analysis), results,
conclusions, and implication. Format of the writing of abstract and key words, as well as
the body of the article must follow this template.

Keywords: in italics and should reflect the substance of the paper as also mentioned in the
title, 3-5 phrases.

How to cite: Author name. (year). The title of article. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, Volume(Issue),
page. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v!i!.xxxxx

Introduction (Times new roman, 12pt, bold)

This template is written as a guide for the format or layout of manuscript published in
the JURNAL DIDAKTIK MATEMATIKA. The author must follow the template precisely.
The manuscript must be written in good English. Authors for whom English is not their native
language should have their paper checked and proofread properly before submission for
grammar and clarity. In addition, writing must adhere to the ethics of academic publications.
It recommended to use Microsoft Word software. Use the page layout menu to
determine the paper size (A4), the margin (3 cm for all sides), spacing (1.5 between lines
without any additional spaces between paragraphs), and font (times new roman, 11).
The introduction must contain (shortly and consecutively) a general background and a
literature review (state of the art), the novelty of the research or gap analysis, the main research
problems. In the final part of the introduction, the purpose of the article writing should also be
stated.
Example of novelty statement or the gap analysis statement in the end of Introduction
section (after state of the art of previous research survey): “........ (short summary of
background) ....... A few researchers focused on ....... There have been limited studies concerned
on ........ Therefore, this research intends to ................. The objectives of this research
are .........”.

1
Jurnal Didaktik Matematika Vol. …, No. …, Month Year

Method
The method describes the type of research, population and sample or research subject,
instruments, procedures for conducting research, data collection techniques and data analysis
techniques. If necessary, the rubric of the instrument or materials used can be displayed to
provide readers clear information.
If there are statistical formulas used as part of the research method, the commonly used
formulas should not be written. However, specific rules (if any) set by researchers in data
collection and analysis may be presented as part of the method. References should be included
as necessary.

Results and Discussion

Results should be clear and concise. The results should be supported by sufficient data.
The following components should be covered in the discussion: How do your results relate to
the original question or objectives outlined in the Introduction section (what/how)? Do you
provide interpretation scientifically for each of your results or findings presented (why)? Are
your results consistent with what other investigators have reported (what else)? Or are there any
differences? Please highlight differences between your results or findings and the previous
publications by other researchers.

How to Write Using Tables and Figures

This is an example of writing subtitles. If the manuscript contains tables or figures. The
table or figure should not be too excessive. Authors should use variations in the presentation of
tables and figures. The tables and figures presented must be referred or explained in the text.
The presentation of tables and images should be based on APA style (see Table 1 and Figure 1).

Table 1. Caption
No Name Description
1 CP_ABSTRACT BODY Abstract
2 CP_ABSTRACT KEYWORD Keyword from abstract
3 CP_AUTHOR Author
5 CP_BODYTEXT Text/paragraph
6 CP_FIGURE Figure caption
7 CP_HEADING 1 Title (Bold)
8 CP_HEADING 2 Sub-title (not bold)
9 CP_HEADING 3 Sub of sub-title (italic)

2
Jurnal Didaktik Matematika Author

4
3.46 3.42 3.31 3.16
3.5 3.26
3 3
3 2.77
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Indicator 1 Indicator 2 Indicator 3 Indicator 4
Male Female
Figure 1. Caption

References in the article and in reference list must be based on the 6 th edition American
Psychological Association (APA) published in 2010 (American Psychological Association, 2010).
APA information can be found in many websites, for example Purdue Online Writing Lab.

Conclusion
The conclusion should answer the objectives of the research. The concluding remark
should not contain only the repetition of the results and discussions or abstract. Provide a clear
scientific justification for your work, and indicate possible applications and extensions. You
should also suggest future experiments and/or point out those that are underway.

Acknowledgement (*if any)

This section consists of gratitude to sponsors or donors of funds, or to those who have a great
contribution in conducting the research.

References
The literature listed in the References contains only the sources referenced or included in
the article. Please use Reference Manager Applications like EndNote, Mendeley, Zotero, etc.
Referral sources should consist of 80% of journal articles, proceedings, or research results from
the last five years. The referencing style should base on the 6 th edition Publication manual of the
American Psychological Association (American Psychological Association, 2010). Here are some
examples.

BOOK
(book with one author)
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories an educational perspective. Boston, MA: Pearson
Education, Inc.

3
Jurnal Didaktik Matematika Vol. …, No. …, Month Year

(Indonesian book with one author)

Madya, S. (2011). Teori dan praktik penelitian tindakan (action research). Bandung: Alfabeta.

(book with two authors)

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Fifth ed.). Needham
Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

(the author of a book similar to the publisher)

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American
Psychological Association (6 ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

(Edited book with two authors)

Emerson, L., & McPherson, J. (Eds.). (1997). Writing guidelines for education students.
Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.

(Edited book with four authors)

Ritter, F. E., Nerb, J., Lehtinen, E., & O'Shea, T. M. (Eds.). (2007). In order to learn: how the
sequence of topics influences learning. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

(book chapter)
Sahlberg, P. (2012). The most wanted: Teachers and teacher education in Finland. In L.
Darling-Hammond & A. Lieberman (Eds.), Teacher education around the world:
changing policies and practices. London: Routledge.

(Translated book)
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories an educational perspective (E. Hamdiah & R. Fajar,
Trans.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. (Original work published 2012).

(e-book)
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2005). How people learn: Brain, mind,
experience and school Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9853/how-people-
learn-brain-mind-experience-and-school-expanded-edition

JOURNAL
(Indonesian journal articles)
Nurgiyantoro, B., & Efendi, A. (2013). Prioritas penentuan nilai pendidikan karakter dalam
pembelajaran sastra remaja. Cakrawala Pendidikan, XXXII(3), 382-393. doi:
10.21831/cp.v3i3.1626

(Journal article with three authors)

Thomas-Hunt, M. C., Ogden, T. Y., & Neale, M. A. (2003). Who's really Sharing? effects of
social and expert status on knowledge exchange within groups. Management Science,
49(4), 464-477. doi: 10.2307/4133951

(Journal article with less than 6 authors)

Janssen, J., Kirschner, F., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Paas, F. (2010). Making the black box
of collaborative learning transparent: Combining process-oriented and cognitive load
approaches. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 139-154. doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-
9131-x

4
Jurnal Didaktik Matematika Author

(Journal article with more than 6 authors)

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Kazdan, S., Karns, K., Calhoon, M. B., Hamlett, C. L., & Hewlett, S.
(2000). Effects of workgroup structure and size on student productivity during
collaborative work on complex tasks. The Elementary School Journal, 100(3), 183-212.
doi: 10.2307/1002151

PROCEEDING
(Published online)
Sulastri, R., Suryadi, D., Prabawanto, Cahya, E., Siagian, M.D., and Tamur, M. (2021).
Prospective mathematics teachers' concept image on the limit of a function. SEA-STEM
2020. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1882 (2021)
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012068

(Published in book)
Cornu, B. (1981). Learning the concept of limit: Models and spontaneous modes. Proceeding of
fifth Conference Psychology of Mathematics Education. (pp. 322-326). Grenoble,
France: Psychology of Mathematics Education.

(Paper presentation)
Retnowati, E. (2012, 24-27 November). Learning mathematics collaboratively or individually.
[Paper presentation]. The 2nd International Conference of STEM in Education, Beijing
Normal University, China.

OTHER SOURCES
(handbook/report of institution or government)
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

(law document)
Permendiknas 2009 No. 22, Kompetensi Dasar Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan
Sekolah Dasar Kelas I-VI.

(Online article)
Purdue Online Writing Lab. (27/03/2015). APA Style. Reference list: Electronic sources (web
publications). Retrieved 12 March, 2017, from
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/10/

(law document)
Undang-Undang RI 2005 No. 14, Guru dan Dosen.

(Overseas regulation)
Child Protection Act 1999 (Qld), s.5