(PDF Download) Lectures On Quantum Mechanics - Perturbed Evolution Englert Fulll Chapter
(PDF Download) Lectures On Quantum Mechanics - Perturbed Evolution Englert Fulll Chapter
(PDF Download) Lectures On Quantum Mechanics - Perturbed Evolution Englert Fulll Chapter
com
https://textbookfull.com/product/lectures-on-
quantum-mechanics-perturbed-evolution-
englert/
textbookfull
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://textbookfull.com/product/lectures-on-quantum-mechanics-
volume-2-simple-systems-2nd-edition-berthold-georg-englert/
https://textbookfull.com/product/lectures-on-quantum-mechanics-
volume-1-basic-matters-2nd-edition-berthold-georg-englert/
https://textbookfull.com/product/lectures-on-the-mathematics-of-
quantum-mechanics-ii-selected-topics-1st-edition-gianfausto-
dellantonio/
https://textbookfull.com/product/lectures-on-classical-and-
quantum-theory-of-fields-2nd-edition-henryk-arodz/
Lectures on General Relativity Cosmology and Quantum
Black Holes 1st Edition Badis Ydri
https://textbookfull.com/product/lectures-on-general-relativity-
cosmology-and-quantum-black-holes-1st-edition-badis-ydri/
https://textbookfull.com/product/lectures-on-light-nonlinear-and-
quantum-optics-using-the-density-matrix-2nd-edition-rand/
https://textbookfull.com/product/computational-quantum-mechanics-
joshua-izaac/
https://textbookfull.com/product/mathematical-foundations-of-
quantum-mechanics-neumann/
https://textbookfull.com/product/fundamentals-of-quantum-
mechanics-ajit-kumar/
Other Lecture Notes by the Author
For photocopying of material in this volume, please pay a copying fee through the Copyright Clearance
Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. In this case permission to photocopy
is not required from the publisher.
Printed in Singapore
To my teachers, colleagues, and students
This page intentionally left blank
Preface
vii
viii Lectures on Quantum Mechanics: Perturbed Evolution
All three books owe their existence to the outstanding teachers, col-
leagues, and students from whom I learned so much. I dedicate these lec-
tures to them.
I am grateful for the encouragement of Professors Choo Hiap Oh and
Kok Khoo Phua who initiated this project. The professional help by the
staff of World Scientific Publishing Co. was crucial for the completion; I
acknowledge the invaluable support of Miss Ying Oi Chiew and Miss Lai
Fun Kwong with particular gratitude. But nothing would have come about,
were it not for the initiative and devotion of Miss Jia Li Goh who turned
the original handwritten notes into electronic files that I could then edit.
I wish to thank my dear wife Ola for her continuing understanding and
patience by which she is giving me the peace of mind that is the source of
all achievements.
Singapore, March 2006 BG Englert
Preface vii
Glossary xiii
Miscellanea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xiii
Latin alphabet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xiv
Greek alphabet and Greek-Latin combinations . . . . . . . . . . xvi
2. Time-Dependent Perturbations 41
2.1 Born series . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
2.2 Scattering operator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
ix
x Lectures on Quantum Mechanics: Perturbed Evolution
3. Scattering 79
3.1 Probability density, probability current density . . . . . . 79
3.2 One-dimensional prelude: Forces scatter . . . . . . . . . . 82
3.3 Scattering by a localized potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
3.3.1 Golden-rule approximation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
3.3.2 Example: Yukawa potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
3.3.3 Rutherford cross section as a limit . . . . . . . . . 91
3.4 Lippmann–Schwinger equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
3.4.1 Born approximation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
3.4.2 Transition operator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
3.4.3 Optical theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
3.4.4 Example of an exact solution . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
3.5 Partial waves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
3.6 s-wave scattering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
Index 187
This page intentionally left blank
Glossary
Here is a list of the symbols used in the text; the numbers in square brackets
indicate the pages of first occurrence or of other significance.
Miscellanea
0 null symbol: number 0, or null column, or null matrix,
or null ket, or null bra, or null operator, et cetera
1 unit symbol: number 1, or unit matrix, or identity
operator, et cetera
A= bB read “A represents B” or “A is represented by B”
Max{ } , Min{ } maximum, minimum of a set of real numbers
a∗ , a complex conjugate of a, absolute value of a
Re(a) , Im(a) real, imaginary part of a
a= a length of vector a
a · b, a × b scalar, vector product of vectors a and b
†
A adjoint of A [3]
det(A), tr(A) determinant [144], trace of A [14]
| i, h |; |1i, ha| generic ket, bra; labeled ket, bra [1]
|initi, hfin| initial ket, final bra [63]
|ini, |outi kets for incoming, outgoing particles [92]
|j1 , j2 ; j, mi, |(j1 , m1 )(j2 , m2 )i kets for composite angular momentum [120]
h | i, | ih | bra-ket, ket-bra [2,3]
| . . . , ti, h. . . , t| ket, bra at time t [27]
h. . . , t1 |. . . , t2 i time transformation function [29]
hAi mean value, expectation value of A
[A, B] commutator of A and B [19]
A(t)A(t0 ) > time-ordered product [46]
↑, ↓ spin-up, spin-down [122]
x! factorial of x [152]
f 2 (x), f −1 (x) x 7→ f (x):
square, inverse of the function
f 2 (x) = f f (x) , f f −1 (x) = x, f −1 f (x) = x
xiii
xiv Lectures on Quantum Mechanics: Perturbed Evolution
Latin alphabet
a range of the hard-sphere potential [110]
a0 Bohr radius, a0 = 0.529 Å [151]
a(t), b(t) probability amplitudes [70]
a(s) Laplace transform of α(t) [60]
A, aj generic operator, its jth eigenvalue [1]
A(t) collection of dynamical variables [27]
A± , A†± harmonic-oscillator ladder operators [129]
A(r ), B(r ) vector potential, magnetic field at r [125]
Å angstrom unit, 1Å = 10−10 m = 0.1 nm [151]
c speed of light, c = 2.99792 × 108 cm s−1 [125]
cos, sin, . . . trigonometric functions
cosh, sinh, . . . hyperbolic functions
e elementary charge, e = 4.80320 × 10−10 Fr [91]
e; ex = exp(x) Euler’s number, e = 2.71828 . . . ; exponential function
E, En , E energy, nth eigenenergy [48], Lagrange parameter [157]
f (uk , vl) normalized mixed matrix element [12]
f k 0, k scattering amplitude [98]
F, F (x) force [35,85]
G, G1 , G2 generators [32]
G± (r , r 0 ), G Green’s functions [94], Green’s operator [101]
h = 2π~ Planck’s constant,
~ = 1.05457 × 10−34 J s = 0.658212 eV fs [19]
H, Ht , H Hamilton operator [27], at time t [29], matrix for H [68]
H0 , H1 ; H1 dominant, small part of H [41]; interaction picture [45]
Hatom , Hphot , atom, photon part of H [53]
Hint ; Hrot interaction part of H [53]; H for rotation [115]
Glossary xv
† †
... = ... , ... = ... , (1.1.1)
aj : A aj = aj aj , (1.1.2)
1
2 Basic Kinematics and Dynamics
The complex number hbk |aj i is the probability amplitude for the measure-
ment result bk in state |aj i; its absolute square is the associated probability.
This amplitude has all properties that are required of an inner product, in
particular
a = a0 + a00 : b a = b a0 + b a00 ,
a = α λ: b a = b α λ, (1.1.5)
are therefore always equal. There is, of course, a lot of circumstantial ev-
idence for the validity of this fundamental symmetry, but — elementary
situations aside — there does not seem to be a systematic direct experi-
mental test.
∗ David Hilbert (1862–1943)
Brief review of basic kinematics 3
so that the kets |aj i make up a basis for the ket space and the bras haj |
compose a basis for the bra space. As an immediate consequence, we note
that the eigenket equation
A aj = aj aj , (1.1.12)
multiplied by haj | on the right and then summed over j, yields
X
A= aj aj aj , (1.1.13)
j
indeed. Similarly, you easily show that it works for other powers of A, then
for all polynomials, then for all functions that can be approximated by, or
related to, polynomials, and so forth. But what is really needed to ensure
that f (A) is well defined is that the numerical function f (aj ) is well defined
for all eigenvalues aj . As a consequence, two functions of A are the same
if they agree for all aj ,
for which the inverse equals the adjoint; see Exercises 2 and 3 for properties
of hermitian and unitary operators and the link between them.
Several observables A, B, C, . . . have their state kets |aj i, |bk i, |cl i, . . .
with probability amplitudes haj |bk i, hbk |cl i, hcl |aj i, . . . . These amplitudes
are not independent, however, but must obey the composition law
X
aj bk = aj cl cl bk , (1.1.22)
l
The wrong interpretation after (1.1.22) would then imply that both C and
D have definite, though unknown, values at the intermediate stage because
the two sums are on equal footing. But this is utterly impossible.
Given operator A with its (nondegenerate) eigenvalues aj and the kets
|aj i, can we always find another observable, B, such that A, B are a pair
of complementary observables? Yes, we can by an explicit construction, for
which
N
1 X 2π
bk = √ aj ei N jk (1.1.27)
N j=1
is the basic example; more about this in Section 1.2.1. It is here assumed
that we deal with a quantum degree of freedom for which there can be at
most N different values for any measurement.
We need to verify that the B states of this construction are orthonormal.
Indeed, they are,
1 X −i 2π jk 2π
bk bl = e N aj am ei N lm
N j,m | {z }
= δjm
N
1 X −i 2π j(k − l)
= e N = δkl . (1.1.28)
N j=1
Then,
X
B= bk bk bk (1.1.29)
k
with any convenient choice for the nondegenerate B values bk will do. By
construction, we have
2 2
1 2π 1
aj bk = √ ei N jk = (1.1.30)
N N
so that A, B are a complementary pair, indeed. We note that this property
is actually primarily a property of the two bases of kets (and bras) associ-
ated with the pair of observables. A common terminology is to call such
pairs of bases unbiased.
Bohr’s principle of complementarity 7
a1 −→ a2 = U a1 ,
a2 −→ a3 = U a2 ,
..
.
aN −→ a1 = U aN , (1.2.1)
generally
U aj = aj+1 , (1.2.2)
U 2 aj = aj+2 , (1.2.3)
U N aj = aj+N = aj . (1.2.4)
Accordingly, we have
UN = 1 (1.2.5)
uN = 1 if U u = u u (1.2.6)
for which
2π
uk = ei N k , k = 1, 2, . . . , N (1.2.7)
are the possible solutions, all of which occur. We can, therefore, write the
equation for U also in the factorized form
U N − 1 = (U − u1 )(U − u2 ) · · · (U − uN )
N
Y
= (U − uk ) . (1.2.8)
k=1
to X = U/uk ,
N
X −1
N N
U − 1 = (U/uk ) − 1 = (U/uk − 1) (U/uk )l
l=0
N
X
= (U/uk − 1) (U/uk )l , (1.2.12)
l=1
Bohr’s principle of complementarity 9
where the first step exploits uNk = 1 and the last step makes use of
(U/uk )0 = 1 = (U/uk )N . Now, for U → uk , the sum equals N , and so we
arrive at
N
1 X l
uk uk = U/uk . (1.2.13)
N
l=1
We have now a second set of bras and kets, for which we can repeat the
story of cyclic permutations, effected by the unitary operator V ,
uk V = uk+1 ,
uk V 2 = uk+2 ,
..
.
uk V N = uk . (1.2.20)
In full analogy with what we did above for U , we conclude here that
N
1 X k
vl v l = (V /vl ) (1.2.22)
N
k=1
and then
2 1
uN vl vl uN = uN vl = . (1.2.24)
N
1
Here, too, we choose huN |vl i = √ and establish
N
N
1 X −i 2π kl
vl = √ e N uk (1.2.25)
N k=1
as well as
N
1 X 2π
vl = √ uk ei N kl . (1.2.26)
N k=1
Bohr’s principle of complementarity 11
Can we continue like this and get more and more sets of kets? No!
Because the kets |vl i are identical with the kets |al i; see
N
X 1 2π
vl = uk √ ei N kl
N
k=1 | {z }
= uk al
!
X
= uk uk al = al . (1.2.27)
k
| {z }
=1
UN = 1 , V N = 1. (1.2.29)
uk U V = uk uk V = uk uk+1 ,
uk V U = uk+1 U = uk+1 uk+1 . (1.2.32)
2π
Since uk+1 = uk ei N , this establishes
2π 2π
uk V U = ei N uk uk+1 = ei N uk U V , (1.2.33)
12 Basic Kinematics and Dynamics
The generalization to
2π 2π
U k V l = e−i N kl V l U k , V l U k = ei N kl U k V l (1.2.35)
is immediate. These are the Weyl∗ commutation relations for the comple-
mentary pair U, V .
or can be brought into this form. It is written here such that all U s are
to the left of all V s in the products, but this is no restriction because the
relations (1.2.35) state that other products can always be brought into this
U, V -ordered form.
In fact, all such functions of U and V make up all operators for this
degree of freedom, which is to say that the complementary pair U, V is
algebraically complete. To make this point, we consider an arbitrary opera-
tor F and note that then the numbers huk |F |vl i are known. We normalize
these mixed matrix elements by dividing by huk |vl i, thus defining the set
of N 2 numbers
uk F vl
f (uk , vl ) = . (1.2.37)
uk vl
Multiply by |uk ihuk | from the left and by |vl ihvl | from the right and sum
over k and l,
X X
uk uk f (uk , vl ) vl vl = uk uk vl f (uk , vl ) vl
k,l k,l
| {z }
= uk F vl
X X
= uk uk F vl vl = F . (1.2.38)
k l
| {z } | {z }
=1 =1
∗ Claus Hugo Hermann Weyl (1885–1955)
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
father scolded me for giving the bear hide away. My little bear hide
was of good size. My father had it tanned for me, and the hide was
also decorated with paint. The bear hide also had a soft, feathery
appearance about its head. I wore it in dances, and kept it by my
pillow in our lodge. Only a few years ago I was visiting the Sioux,
and while I was gone some white man came to our village. He saw
the bear robe in our lodge. He asked how much they wanted for the
hide, and my bear was sold to some white man. When I came back
home I missed my bear, and asked where it was. My folks said, “We
sold it to a white man.” I was sorry, but it was all right, for we do not
have any more Bear dances.
FOOTNOTES:
[84] Told by White-Bear.
ABSTRACTS.
1. THE WOLF AND LUCKY-MAN CREATE LAND.
Wolf and Lucky-Man meet on shore of big lake, where two ducks
are swimming. Wolf challenges Lucky-Man to see who can endure
rain longest. Lucky-Man wins. Wolf sends Duck down to fetch dirt
from bottom of lake. Duck brings up mud, which Wolf throws in north
and forms into prairie. Lucky-Man sends Duck for more mud, which
he throws on south side of Wolf’s land. Hills and mountains are
formed and buffalo are on land. There is channel between two
countries created, occupied by Missouri River.