Buy Ebook Socio Psychological Effects of Urban Green Areas Case of Kirklareli City Center 1st Edition Dr. Ezgi Tok Cheap Price
Buy Ebook Socio Psychological Effects of Urban Green Areas Case of Kirklareli City Center 1st Edition Dr. Ezgi Tok Cheap Price
Buy Ebook Socio Psychological Effects of Urban Green Areas Case of Kirklareli City Center 1st Edition Dr. Ezgi Tok Cheap Price
com
https://textbookfull.com/product/socio-
psychological-effects-of-urban-green-areas-
case-of-kirklareli-city-center-1st-edition-
dr-ezgi-tok/
textbookfull
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://textbookfull.com/product/redeploying-urban-
infrastructure-the-politics-of-urban-socio-technical-futures-
jonathan-rutherford/
https://textbookfull.com/product/policy-making-in-a-
transformative-state-the-case-of-qatar-1st-edition-m-evren-tok/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-identification-of-the-city-
on-the-legibility-and-wayfinding-concepts-a-case-of-trabzon-2nd-
edition-dr-aysel-yavuz/
https://textbookfull.com/product/livable-city-one-step-towards-
sustainable-development-3rd-edition-dr-farzaneh-
sasanpour-1-1-department-of-geography-and-urban-planning/
https://textbookfull.com/product/establishment-of-space-syntax-
to-read-and-analyze-urban-network-the-case-of-study-famagusta-
city-of-cyprus-1st-edition-ph-d-candidate-ehsan-valipour/
https://textbookfull.com/product/sustainability-in-historic-
urban-environments-effect-of-gentrification-in-the-process-of-
sustainable-urban-revitalization-1st-edition-dr-rokhsaneh-
rahbarianyazd/
A R T I C L E I N F O: ABSTRACT
Article history: Urban open green spaces have an important role in today's health
Received 20 April 2019
Accepted 6 June 2019 problems and the necessity for the urban health to create green areas that
Available online 30 August have high accessibility for all citizens. Acceleration of urbanization in recent
2019 decades decays balance of green areas and impervious surfaces in cities
because of rent seeking society. The main problem associated with
Keywords: adequate provision of green area and fair access for residents. According
Green Spaces; to the “Spatial Planning Policy Framework” the green area per capita in
Socio-Psychological urban area (10 m²), Kırklareli doesn’t provide green space per capita. The
Effect; aim of the study is to identify the socio-psychological effects of the green
Urban Planning; areas in the Kirklareli. Objectives of the study is to determine the correlation
Urban Health.
between socio- psychological criterias with green space accesiblity, per
capita and visiting time and to discuss the findings rationale. The following
This work is licensed under a
hypothesis was proposed “urban green areas on inhabitants have positive
Creative Commons Attribution - effects on human health, quality of life and stress”. In this context, a survey
NonCommercial - NoDerivs 4.0. was conducted to analyze the socio-psychological effects of urban green
"CC-BY-NC-ND"
spaces in Kirklareli. Expected outcome of the study is that green areas are
associated with positive emotions, green space per capita and accessibility
This article is published with Open that can assist to decrease inequalities in health.
Access at www.ijcua.com
JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY URBAN AFFAIRS (2020), 4(1), 47-60.
https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2020.v4n1-5
www.ijcua.com
Copyright © 2019 Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs. All rights reserved.
accessibility to urban green space decrease,
1 . Introduction therefore presence of open and green areas is
Historically, from the beginning of the 20th century, needed more than ever before. Due to the
there has been an awareness of the importance adverse effects of the decline in the areal size of
of green space in urban planning (Verheij et al., urban green space in the urban areas, studies on
2008). However, the population growth rates have the effects of green areas on urban health have
been increasing exponently, natural and semi- started to be carried out (Cicea and Pîrlogea,
natural areas (agriculture, pasture, forest and 2011).
urban green areas) are under pressure in urban *Corresponding Author:
fringe (Martinez-Gonzalez et al., 2001). As a result Faculty of Architecture, Kirklareli University, Kirklareli, Turkey
of this situation, green space per capita and Email address: ezgitok@gmail.com
natural environment (Huynh et al., 2013). Urban the current status after the spatial analysis. In other
green areas in cities have many benefits in terms words, the functional uses of the green areas and
of health (Fuller and Gaston, 2009; Roberts et al., their spatial qualification were measured in
2019; Lee and Maheswaran, 2010; Alcock et al., Kırklareli. In the considerations of urban open and
2014; Soga and Gaston, 2016) and well-being green areas, although the open and green area
(Fuller and Gaston, 2009; Soga and Gaston, 2016; standard in the current zoning legislation green
Roberts et al., 2019), and it is found that living in a area per capita should be 10 m², it was calculated
close proximity to the green area has a reducing in the present settlement areas in Kırklareli are less
effecton heart and respiratory diseases than 10 m2 and the green areas are not sufficient
(Villeneuve, et al., 2012; Tamosiunas et al., 2014) and qualified in terms of size and reinforcement. In
and there is a positive relationship between the this context, the aim of this study is to analyze the
higher level of physical activity (Cohen et al., 2007; possible psychosocial consequences and to
Toftager et al., 2011) and the frequency of green develop socio-spatial approaches.
areas usage (Cohen et al., 2007; Akpınar, 2014; In this context, the following correlations were
Nielsen and Hansen, 2007). The potential benefits examined;
from open green areas are becoming vital in cities • the proximity and the visiting time in the
where green areas are threatened by urbanisation green area
(Dallimer et al., 2011). • the frequency of green space usage and
There are various evidences that areal size of mood
green space near residential area is clearly • satisfaction of size of green area and the
correlated with physical activity (Bancroft et al., frequency of green area usage and
2015; Paquet et al., 2013) among individuals with visiting time
low stress levels (Fan et al., 2011), mental health The following hypotheses were tested.
(Gascon et al., 2015; Van den Berg, et al., 2015) The frequency of use and spending time
happiness, and general health (Maas, 2006; rises as the areal size of green area
Verheij et al., 2008). The areal size of green space increases
also has a positive influence on loneliness, social Emotionally positive feelings rise as the time
support, especially for children, the elderly and spending increases
individuals with low level economic status (Maas et User profiles and needs of these urban green areas
al., 2009). There is a positive link between how were defined by the survey study. Spatial analysis
often the green areas are visited, how much time were conducted and spatial suggestions were
is spent and the healing / decrease of stress and developed to increase the use of green areas in
depression symptoms (Bedimo-Rung et al., 2005). the city center by considering the user satisfaction
It is determined that there was a direct relationship and needs.
with the green area in terms of quality of life and
health (Grahn et al., 2003; Nielsen and Hansen, 2 . Study Area
2007; Stigsdotter et al., 2010). People living in the Kirklareli Province is located in transition area of the
green area more than 1 kilometer closeness use southern Thrace Region of Turkey. The province
open and green areas to do excercises less than has borders with Bulgaria to the north, Black Sea to
the individuals living in the green area less than 300 the east, Istanbul to the southeast, Tekirdag to the
meters (Toftager et al., 2011). It is determined that south and Edirne to the west (Figure 1). It has a land
the individuals who has an accessibility to green area of 6550 km² with an altitude of 203 meters
areas within a radius of 1-3 kilometers feel above the sea level, a continental climate system
themselves healthier compared to individuals and a total population of 351 684 (TURKSTAT, 2016).
living far away from green areas (Maas, 2006; Kırklareli city center, which is chosen as the study
Verheij et al., 2008). Spatial planning regulation area, is located in the central part of Kırklareli
states that urban open and green spaces such as province between 41 ° 50 'North Latitudes and 27
playgrounds, sports areas, and urban parks should ° 20' East Longitude (Figure 1). The amount of build
be planned with in the service area of 500 meters, up area in 2018 is about 868 hectares.
which is accessible unit for pedestrians (Spatial
Planning Regulation, 2014).
%92 of the total population lives in urban areas
according to the Turkish Statistical Institution data
of 2018. Therefore, urban areas have dense
population which lead destructive pressure on
urban green areas throughout the cities. The aim
of this study is to determine the socio-
psychological effects of the functions and areal
size of open green areas in Kirklareli, and to discuss
Dr. Ezgi TOK., et al., 49
JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY URBAN AFFAIRS, 4(1), 47-60/ 2020
value between 0,90 and 1,00 means "too high"). health problem (See App-1, Question no: 36)
But only correlations that are significant at sigf < (Table 2, Figure 8).
0.05 or 0.01 should be considered (abbreviated as
sigf in text) (Zaid, 2015:4-12) Table 2. Frequency Analysis of Survey
3.2 Spatial Analysis Frequency
Disease Ratio (%)
In the study, GIS and Remote Sensing technologies
were used for spatial representation of green Tension 6 3
areas. Aerial photographs have a significant place Respiratory 57 29
in urban planning and are an important tool for Psychological 31 16
meeting the changing economic, social and
Orthopedic 51 26
recreational needs of the society and for
Internal 36 18
monitoring of urban development. In order to get
fast and accurate results in physical planning Others 15 8
studies, it is necessary to use aerial photographs Total 196 100
frequently. Therefore, as a quick method and
providing reliable information, aerial photographs
lead to interpretations for the future in various
disciplines.
In this context, satellite images of 2015, obtained
from the General Directorate of Mapping, were
rectified according to the relevant external
orientation parameters and made available for
operation (Fig. 7). These maps were digitized for
analyzing green areas distribution in the city. As a
result of this qualitative and qualitative inquiries
made about the use of urban green spaces and
related spatial formation processes. Survey data
were entered into the GIS environment and spatial
representations were made.
education at the secondary and higher The usage frequency of urban open and
education level. The mean age of main green areas becomes more prominent
group is lower than the control group. once a week and more than once a week
In terms of user satisfaction; in all neighborhoods of the city. Daily park
The main group predominantly lives in visiting is quite low throughout the city
Karacaibrahim (25,8%), Karakas (22,6%) (Figure 10-11).
and Yayla (19,6%) Neighborhoods. The main group spends time in parks once
The main group can access to the urban a month or several times a week. However
parks in the city by 5-10 minutes walking control group visits parks several times a
time. In the correlation test, there is a high week. Similarly, the main group usually uses
positive relationship between the distance parks less than 15 minutes, while the control
to the nearest green area and the time group spends 15-30 minutes. In the
spending in the park (sigf: 0.000, p: 0.683). correlation test, it is seen that the main
In the control group, it is seen that this group have a positive relationship
distance is up to 15 minutes. In the between visiting timein the park and the
correlation test, there is a positive accessibility, which is negatively affected
relationship between the proximity to the by the park use (sigf: 0.027, p: -0.411).
nearest green area and the time spending In the control group, there is a negative
in the park (sigf: 0.000, p: 0.577). low-level relationship (sigf: 0.000,
There is a negative low-level relationship p: -0.284) between the time spending in
(sigf: 0.000, p: -0.275) among the responses the park and the positive effect of
given that distance to the nearest green accessibility to the parks.
area or accessibility are positively
impacted on park use.
The intended use of parks for main group is
limited to recreational activities. On the
other hand it was seen that there was a
multilayered use in recreational, social and
sports activities for control group. The main
explanations for the usage of urban open
and green areas are social activity in the
Karahıdır neighborhood and recreation in
other neighborhoods. The proximity of the
parks is among the last reasons for useage
(Figure 9).
Main group
Cohen, D.A., McKenzie, T.L., Sehgal, A., Williamson, Kaplan, R. (2001). The nature of the view from
S., Golinelli, D., & Lurie, N. (2007). Contribution of home: psychological benefits. Environment &
public parks to physical activity. American Behavior, 33, 507–542.
Journal of Public Health, 97(3), 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973115
https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.072447
Kaczynski, A.T., Potwarka, L.R., & Saelens, B.E.
Dallimer, M., Tang, Z., Bibby, P., Brindley, P., Gaston, (2008). Association of park size, distance and
K.J., Davies, Z.G. (2011). Temporal changes in features with physical activity in neighborhood
greenspace in a highly urbanized region. parks. American Journal of Public Health, 98(8),
Biology Letters, 7(5), 763-766. Retrieved From: 1451–1456.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/508 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.129064
31298_Temporal_changes_in_greenspace_in_a
_highly_urbanised_region Koohsari, M.J., Mavoa, S., Villanueva, K.,
Sugiyama, T., Badland, H., Kaczynski, A.T.,
Ersoy, M. (2015). Kentsel Planlama Standartlar Owen, N., & Giles-Corti, B. (2015). Public open
[Standards in Urban Planning], Ninova Yayıncılık, space, physical activity, urban design and
İstanbul. public health: concepts, methods and research
agenda. Health Place, 33, 75–82.
Fan, Y., Das, K.V., & Chen, Q. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.02.0
Neighborhood green, social support, physical 09
activity, and stress: Assessing the cumulative
impact. Health & Place, 17(6), 1202-1211. Kremer, P., Hamstead, Z., Haase, D., McPhearson,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.0 T., Frantzeskaki, N., Andersson, E., Kabisch, N.,
08 Larondelle, N., Rall, E.L., Voigt, A., Baró, F.,
Bertram, C., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Hansen, R.,
Fuller, R., Gaston, K. (2009). The scaling of green Kaczorowska, A., Kain, J.H., Kronenberg, J.,
space coverage in European cities. Biology Langemeyer, J., Pauleit, S., Rehdanz, K.,
Letters 5(3), 352-355. Schewenius, M., van Ham, C., Wurster, D., &
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0010 Elmqvist, T. (2016). Key insights for the future of
urban ecosystem services research. Ecology
Gascon, M., Triguero-Mas, M., Martinez, D., and Society, 21(2), 29.
Dadvand, P., Forns, J., Plasencia, A., & http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08445-210229
Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2015). Mental health
benefits of long-term exposure to residential Lee, A.C.K., & Maheswaran, R. (2010). The health
green and blue spaces: a systematic review. benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the
International Journal of Environmental Research evidence. Public Health, 33(2), 212-22.
and Public Health, 12 (4), 4354-4379. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdq068
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120404354
Maas, J., Verheij, R., A., Groenewegen, P., P., Vries,
Grahn P., Stigsdotter, U.A. (2003). Landscape S., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2006). Green space,
planning and stress. Urban Forestry & Urban urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation?.
Greening, 2(1), 1-18. Journal of Epidemiology and Community
https://doi.org/10.1078/1618-8667-00019 Health, 7(60), 587-592.
https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.043125
Honold, J., Lakes, T., Beyer, R., & van der Meer, E.
(2016). Restoration in urban spaces: Nature Maas, J., Spreeuwenberg, P., van Winsum-Westra,
views from home, greenways, and public parks. M., Verheij, R.A., de Vries, S., & Groenewegen,
Environment and Behavior, 48(6), 796-825. P.P. (2009). Is green space in the living
Retrieved From: environment associated with people's feelings
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514568556 of social safety?. Environment and Planning A,
41, 1763-1777. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4196
Huynh, Q., Craig, W., Janssen, I., & Pickett, W.
(2013). Exposure to public natural space as a Martinez-Gonzalez, M.A., Varo, J.J., Santos, J.L., De
protective factor for emotional well-being Irala, J., Gibney, M., Kearney, J., & Martínez, J.A.
among young people in Canada. BMC Public (2001). Prevalence of physical activity during
leisure time in the European Union. Medicine &
Dr. Ezgi TOK., et al., 56
JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY URBAN AFFAIRS, 4(1), 47-60/ 2020
Mekansal Planlar Yapım Yönetmeliği [Spatial Plans Soga, M., Gaston, K. (2016). Extinction of
Construction Regulation.]. (2014, 14 June). experience: the loss of human-nature
(Regulation No: 29030). Retrieved From: interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the
http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2014/06/ Environment, 14(2), 94-101.
20140614-2.htm https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1225
Nielsen, T. S., & Hansen, K. B. (2007). Do green areas Stigsdotter, U., Ekholm, O., Schipperijn, J., Toftager,
affect health? results from a Danish survey on M., Kamper-Jørgensen, F., & Randrup, T,B.
the use of green areas and health indicators. (2010). Health promoting outdoor environments
Health & Place, 13(4), 839-850. – associations between green space, and
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.02.0 health, health-related quality of life and stress
01 based on a Danish national representative
survey. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health,
Oktay, D. (1998). Green spaces and the ecological 38, 411-
quality of housing: the case of Cypriot 417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810367468
settlements. Ekistics, 391/392/393(65), 283-291.
Retrieved From: Tamosiunas, A., Grazuleviciene, R., Luksiene,
https://www.jstor.org/stable/43623310?seq=1# D., Dedele, A., Reklaitiene, R., Baceviciene,
metadata_info_tab_contents M., Vencloviene, J., Bernotiene, G.,
Radisauskas, R., Malinauskiene, V.,
Paquet, C., Orschulok, T.P., Coffee, N.T., Howard, Milinaviciene, E., Bobak, M., Peasey,
N.J., Hugo, G., Taylor, A.W., Adams, R.J., & A., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J. (2014). Accessibility
Daniel, M. (2013). Are accessibility and and use of urban green spaces and
characteristics of public open spaces cardiovascular health: findings from a Kaunas
associated with a better cardiometabolic cohort study. Environment Health, 13:20-31.
health? Landscape and Urban Planning, 118, https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-13-20
70–78.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.11.0 Toftager, M., Ekholm, O., Schipperijn, J., Stigsdotter,
11 U., Bentsen, P., Grønbæk, M., Randrup, T.B., &
Kamper-Jørgensen, F. (2011). Distance to green
Planlı Alanlar İmar Yönetmeliği [Planned Areas space and physical activity: a Danish national
Zoning Regulation.] (2017, 3 July). (Regulation representative survey. Journal of Physical
No: 30113). Retrieved From: Activity and Health, 8, 741-749. Retrieved From:
http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2017/07/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/218322
20170703-8.htm 88
Roberts, H., Sadler, J., & Chapman, L. (2019). The Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu [Turkish Statistical Institute].
value of twitter data for determining the (2019). Retrieved From:
emotional responses of people to urban green http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1059
spaces: a case study and critical evaluation.
Urban Studies, 56(4), 818–835. Van den Berg, M., Wendel-Vos, W., van Poppel, M.,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017748544 Kemper, H., van Mechelen, W., & Maas, J.
(2015). Health benefits of green spaces in the
Schipperijn, J., Bentsen, P., Troelsen, J., Toftager, living environment: a systematic review of
M., & Stigsdotter UK. (2013). Associations epidemiological studies. Urban Forestry & Urban
between physical activity and characteristics of Greening, 14, 806-816.
urban green space. Urban Forestry & Urban https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.008
Greening, 12,109–116.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.12.002 Verheij, R., A., Maas, J., & Groenewegen, P., P.
(2008). Urban–rural health differences and the
Shishegar, N. (2014). The impact of green areas on availability of green space. European Urban
mitigating urban heat island effect: a review. and Regional Studies, 15(4), 307–316.
The International Journal of Environmental https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776408095107
Sustainability, 9(1), 119-30. Retrieved From:
Dr. Ezgi TOK., et al., 57
JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY URBAN AFFAIRS, 4(1), 47-60/ 2020
Appendix 1: Survey Frequency Analysis Table for Main and Control Group.
Survey evauation by users that answered the "do you have any
Survey evaluation by other users
discomfort?" (see question 36) " as "psychological discomfort”
I. User Profile
Age Groups Frequency Percent (%) Age Groups Frequency Percent (%)
Young (0-17) 24 3.2 Young (0-17) 2 6.5
Adult (18-64) 689 93.2 Adult (18-64) 28 90.3
Elderly (65+) 26 3.5 Elderly (65+) 1 3.2
Total 739 100.0 Total 31 100.0
Minimum Age: 12 Minimum Age: 16
Maximum Age: 85 Maximum Age: 67
Average Age: 32 Average Age: 26
Gender Frequency Percent (%) Gender Frequency Percent (%)
Male 429 58.1 Male 23 74.2
Female 310 41.9 Female 8 25.8
Total 739 100.0 Total 31 100.0
Education Status Frequency Percent (%) Education Status Frequency Percent (%)
Literate 101 13.7 Literate 2 6.5
Illiterate 25 3.4 Elementary school 7 22.6
Elementary school 109 14.7 Secondary school 6 19.4
Secondary school 206 27.9 University 16 51.6
University 298 40.3 Total 31 100.0
Total 739 100.0
II. User Satisfaction
Walking Time To Nearest Park Frequency Percent (%) Walking Time To Nearest Park Frequency Percent (%)
5 minutes 278 37.6 5 minutes 10 32.3
6-10 minutes 178 24.1 6-10 minutes 10 32.3
11-15 minutes 125 16.9 11-15 minutes 4 12.9
16-20 minutes 86 11.6 16-20 minutes 2 6.5
20 minutes and more 71 9.6 20 minutes and more 5 16.1
Total 739 100.0 Total 31 100.0
Purpose of Park Usage Frequency Percent (%) Purpose of Park Usage Frequency Percent (%)
Rekreation 256 35.4 Recreation 17 54.8
Spor 122 16.9 Spor 5 16.1
Social activities 253 28.0 Social activities 3 9.7
Closeness to the place where they live 88 12.2 Closeness to the place where they live 1 3.2
Socialization 50 6.9 Others 5 16.1
Others 5 .7 Total 31 100.0
Total 724 100.0
Frequency of Park Usage Frequency Percent (%) Frequency of Park Usage Frequency Percent (%)
Never 27 3.7 Never 1 3.2
Once in mount 127 17.3 Once in mount 8 25.8
Once in week 261 35.6 Once in week 7 22.6
More than one in week 251 34.2 More than one in week 9 29.0
Everyday 67 9.1 Everyday 6 19.4
Total 733 100.0 Total 31 100.0
Spending Time in a Park Frequency Percent (%) Spending Time in a Park Frequency Percent (%)
15 minutes and less 396 57.6 15 minutes and less 19 61.3
15-30 minutes 176 25.6 15-30 minutes 6 19.4
30-60 minutes 87 12.6 30-60 minutes 4 12.9
60 minutes and more 29 4.2 60 minutes and more 2 6.5
Total 688 100.0 Total 31 100.0
II.I. Question 27. Do the following have a positive impact on the use of the nearby park / green area? (Prominent 3 answers)
II.II. Question 28. Do the following have a negative impact on the use of the nearby park / green area? (Prominent 3 answers)
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside
the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to
the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying,
displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works
based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The
Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright
status of any work in any country other than the United States.