Articles 17) DairyIndia
Articles 17) DairyIndia
Articles 17) DairyIndia
net/publication/305249856
CITATIONS READS
32 12,746
1 author:
Ramphul Ohlan
Stanford University Top 2% Scientists List
85 PUBLICATIONS 1,380 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Ramphul Ohlan on 02 July 2018.
(NSSO, 2012). Milk and dairy products are a major source of cheap and nutritious
food to millions of Indians (Ohlan, 2012a).
The dairy sector in India has witnessed remarkable growth, which is demand-driven,
inclusive and pro-poor. India is the world’s largest producer and consumer of milk.
With a production of 121.8 million tonnes in 2011, it accounted for 16 per cent of
the world’s total milk production (Ohlan, 2014a). In 2010–11, 29.64 per cent of
India’s agricultural gross domestic product (GDP) originated in the livestock sector,
with the dairy subsector accounting for approximately 70 per cent of livestock output.
India’s vast resource of livestock plays a vital role in improving the socio-economic
conditions of the rural masses. In addition, the dairy sector provides a large window
of self-employment opportunities, particularly for women. More than 60 per cent of
families involved in dairying belong to the small and marginal farming sector or are
even agricultural labourers. Estimates of employment in animal husbandry suggest
11.44 million persons in principal status and 11.01 million in subsidiary status, which is
5.50 per cent of the total workforce in the country. Out of these 22.45 million persons
engaged in animal husbandry, 16.84 million (75 per cent) are women, showing that the
dairy sector fuels much-needed women’s empowerment and inclusive growth. As India
is also a net exporter of dairy products, in the emerging liberalised farm trade order,
the dairy sector holds great promise as a major source of foreign exchange earnings,
with India’s dairy exports valued at `54,797.42 lakh in 2010–11 (Ohlan, 2014b).1
It is because of rapidly increasing disposable incomes, market development,
population growth, urbanisation, changes in lifestyles and dietary preferences, increased
health, nutrition and diet concerns, together with the growing popularity of dairy
products that the demand for milk and milk products has been growing fast in India
(Ohlan, 2013a). There is still greater need for butter, ghee, cheese, skimmed milk
and other dairy products. It is well documented that consumption patterns in India
have been undergoing dramatic shifts in food demand, away from staple food grains
to high-nutrition higher-value commodities like fruits, vegetables, milk, meat and
eggs (Ali, 2007; Tripathi & Srivastava, 2011; Wiley, 2011). In terms of the share in
consumers’ monthly total food consumption expenditure, dairy products rank second
after cereals with a share of 19.16 per cent in urban India in 2009–10 (NSSO, 2012).
As a chief source of incomes and nutritious food for the majority of India’s rural
poor (Verma et al., 2007), the dairy sector is also crucial for food security. About 70 per
cent of India’s population lives in rural areas. In 2007–08, about 73 per cent of rural
households owned livestock. Small and marginal farmers account for three-quarters of
these livestock-owning households, raising 56 per cent of the bovine and 66 per cent
of the sheep population. Dairying has been considered one of the activities aimed
at alleviating poverty, especially in rural areas in rainfed and drought-prone regions
(Ohlan, 2011). Rural poverty is less in states like Punjab, Haryana, Jammu & Kashmir,
Himachal Pradesh, Kerala, Gujarat and Rajasthan where dairy accounts for a sizeable
share of agricultural income and employment. For small and marginal producers,
the dairy sector also serves as a productive store of wealth, providing drought power
and organic fertilisers to improve crop production. Given milk’s nutritional quality,
growing evidence exists on the role of dairy foods in reducing risks of numerous medical
disorders (Sarkar, 2008). The nutritional value of milk is especially high as part of the
diets of growing infants and lactating mothers. Continuing population growth and
rapid inclusive economic growth are expected to drive dairy product demand up sharply.
India has the world’s largest dairy herd, comprised cows and buffalos and the dairy
sector is expected to contribute as an engine of agricultural growth in India’s 12th Five-
Year Plan (2012–17) and beyond, given the rapid growth in demand for animal and
food products. India’s programmes of rural development and economic liberalisation
open significant market-led opportunities for the dairy industry. For example, flagship
programmes such as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act
(MNREGA), with an annual union budget allocation of US$ 6.6 billion in 2012–13,
created income opportunities at the bottom of the economic pyramid, which is likely
to have contributed to increasing demand for milk and milk products. Overall, as
Indians become more affluent, the demand for dairy products is expected to increase.
To meet the fast growing demand for milk and milk products, milk production in
India needs to be increased.
OECD-FAO (2012) in their joint outlook estimate the average growth rate of
global milk production for the next decade, 2012–21, at 2 per cent, only slightly
below the 2.1 per cent increase witnessed in the last decade. Most of this growth is
anticipated to come from developing countries and India and China alone account for
nearly 40 per cent of these anticipated gains. Dairy product use, expected to increase
by about 30 per cent by 2021, is driven by increasing population, income levels and
the growing influence of retail chains and multinational companies, which facilitate
improved consumer access to such products. Such cross-sector connections confirm
that in-depth understanding of the dynamics of India’s dairy product distribution
and consumption is invaluable for academic exploration as well as policy formation.
Improving the milk production growth rate to meet projected demands is a key
developmental challenge facing the Indian dairy sector today (Government of India,
2012b). But how can this growth rate be enhanced? And, even if India achieves the
targeted milk output levels, is the availability of milk across various regions symmetric?
More importantly, is dairy product consumption across various income groups equally
distributed? What are the recent trends in domestic prices of dairy products in India?
Are changes in composition of the livestock population desirable? A comprehensive
study to address these key questions is lacking and an evaluation of India’s milk and
milk products consumption pattern with the latest available data is warranted.
As the Indian dairy sector is characterised by high fragmentation and is dominated
by the unorganised sector, comprising 70 million rural households, it will also
be informative to explore how the unorganised sector may be converted into a more
organised one. Against this comprehensive backdrop of concerns and questions, the
modest objective of the present study is twofold. First, to analyse significant recent
structural changes and inequality patterns in the consumption of dairy products in
India, and second, to investigate the supply-side changes in the dairy sector in India.
The concluding analysis aims to introduce some new ideas for improving access to
milk and milk products.
The research undertaken here confirms that milk and milk products are the second
most important items in consumer food expenditure. They commanded a share of
16.04 per cent in rural and 19.16 per cent in urban India in 2009–10, up from 13.44
per cent in rural and 16.84 per cent in urban India in 1987–88. It turns out that the
expenditure on milk and milk products has grown in both relative and absolute terms.
Furthermore, dairy products constitute a larger share in consumer expenditure in
urban centres than in rural areas. On average, growth in dairy product consumption
in urban areas is steady and higher, compared with rural areas.
The reverse has been observed for pulses and grams. This confirms that urbanisation
has led to lower total pulses consumption, but higher dairy product use. This increased
share of milk and milk products in total food expenditure has been accompanied by
growing shares of beverages, fish, meat, vegetables, fruits and nuts, perhaps partially due
to higher inflation in the prices of fish, meat, vegetables and fruits. Other major items in
the consumer food basket include edible oils and sugar. Over the last two decades, the
share of milk and milk products in consumers’ food expenditure has clearly increased in
both urban and rural areas. These results, indicating that with increasing income levels
the composition of food consumption has witnessed considerable changes, too, lend
further support to the finding of Jones et al. (2003), who argue that income changes
affect not only the level, but also the composition of food consumption. In parallel,
Table 1 also shows that within total consumption expenditure, Indian consumers
spend more on non-food items such as durables and services.2 The shares of non-food
items rose from 36 per cent to 46.4 per cent for the rural population and from 43.6
per cent to 59.3 per cent in urban areas since 1987–88.
As reported by the Government of India on nutritional intake in India (NSSO,
2012), between 1993–94 and 2009–10, the contribution of milk and milk products
to protein intake rose from 3 per cent in the lowest decile class to 15 per cent in the
highest in the rural sector and from 5 per cent to 18 per cent in the urban sector
among the same income deciles. Similarly, the share of milk and milk products in
total calorie intake grew by about 1.4 per cent in urban sectors and 0.6 per cent in
rural sectors during the same period. Likewise, rural sectors record an increase of
about 1 per cent in the contribution of milk and milk products to protein intake,
while the corresponding urban figure is 2 per cent. This confirms that dairy products
have become increasingly important food items in both rural and urban areas in India
during the last two decades.
Concerning state-level variations in dairy products consumption, it has been
observed that 4 of the 17 major states have a rural population with per capita
expenditure markedly higher than the national rural average. Rural Haryana has nearly
four times the national average, rural Punjab more than three times and rural Rajasthan
and Gujarat each show one and a half times to over twice the national average. Rural
Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh have per capita expenditures close to the all-India
average. In all other 11 major states, the per capita expenditure of the rural population
on milk and milk products is appreciably less than the national average.
The responsiveness of demand for dairy products with respect to change in income was
also analysed using time series data derived from various NSSO rounds of household
consumption surveys from 1970–71 to 2009–10. Details of these analyses are not
reproduced here and may be obtained from the author. The income elasticity of demand
worked out to be less than one in both rural and urban areas. This finding reveals that
over time, milk and milk products consumption would rise significantly with income
growth, especially in rural areas. These results are sharply different from those reported
in Gandhi and Zhou (2010) and Rakotoarisoa and Gulati (2006). Clearly, though,
income growth is likely to translate into a sizeable demand for milk and milk products.
Table 3 Compound Annual Growth Rates of Dairy Products Price Indices, 2005–11
Dairy Products Powder Milk Ghee Butter Ice Cream Condensed Milk Milk
9.13* 8.84* 11.35* 8.98* 2.90* 5.40* 11.44*
Source: Author’s calculation.
Note: * indicates that growth rate is statistically significant at 1 per cent level.
number of factors, including: (1) the cost of production and domestic supply of milk,
(2) the consumer demand for milk and its various product forms, (3) seasonality in
milk production and (4) dairy products import and export policies. No one of these
dominates in the pricing of dairy products but each contributes in some measure to
the complex dairy products pricing process. A comparison of domestic price index of
dairy products with that of the international price index brings out that international
prices of dairy products have fluctuated over the years, while domestic prices in India
exhibited a consistent rise. The fact that the fluctuations in international prices of
dairy products have not been transmitted into the Indian markets may partially be
due to government regulation on the trade of dairy products in India. Overall, it may
be concluded here that the international prices of dairy products have been more
volatile than Indian domestic prices. This offers some security to the milk producers.
160 350
146
138
140 132 300
128
120 116122
112
108 250
103
100 97
93
86 88 200
78 81 84
80 72 75
64 66 69
61 150
60 56 58
51 54
Availability (gm/day)
48
44 46 47
0 0
Year
Source: Author’s calculation.
Ohlan: Dairy Economy of India 251
It is seen from this figure that throughout the 1950s and 1960s, India’s milk production
was virtually stagnant, and annual production growth was negative in many years.
Thereafter, however, it has grown substantially, so that overall, Figure 1 above reveals a
substantial growth momentum in milk production, which results in higher availability
of milk and milk products for India’s growing population. The per capita availability
of milk, which increased slightly from 130 gm/day in 1950 to 132 gm/day in 1955,
started to decline in 1960 and dropped to 110 gm/day in 1973. Thereafter, however,
it started to improve, increasing substantially during the 1980s and 1990s, to reach
222 gm/day in 2001. The per capita availability of milk has reached a level of 281 gm/
day in 2010, still slightly lower than the world average of 284 gm/day. In 2011–12,
it stands at about 289 gm/day, just comparable to the world average (Ohlan, 2014a),
but not considered sufficient for the large lacto-vegetarian population of India.
Table 4 provides the decade-wise compound annual growth rates of total milk
production in India over the period 1950–2010. Throughout the 1950s and 1960s
milk production in India was virtually stagnant and annual production growth was
negative in many years.
The compound annual growth rate of milk production was 1.64 per cent per
annum during the decade of 1950s, declining to 1.15 per cent during 1960–73. As
discussed, this resulted in a downward trend in per capita availability of milk, which
was already quite low. The growth rate of milk production then increased from 1.15
per cent per annum during 1960–73 to 4.51 per cent per annum during 1973–80
and further to 5.48 per cent per annum during 1980–90. It declined again slightly
to 4.11 per cent per annum during 1990–2000 and improved again to 4.5 per cent
per annum during 2000–10.
It seems that the resulting expansion of the dairy sector in India has been
achieved through two noteworthy evolutions: First, the successful implementation
of the White Revolution programme in conjunction with other dairy development
programmes implemented by the state and central governments. Second, growing
demand was driven, as indicated in the introduction, by increased population,
higher incomes, growing urbanisation, rural development programmes like the
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA), export
opportunities and changing food habits, including heightened awareness about the
benefits of milk consumption. This development was accompanied by an even more
marked increase in the number of dairy species and improvement in milk yields. It
represents sustained growth in the availability of dairy products for the increasing
population of the country, apart from being an important source of income for the
rural poor.
Regarding the cost of milk production, India is a competitive producer in the
world. India’s average cost of milk production on a farm of two cows was reported to
be US$ 23 per tonne in 2006. The corresponding figures for Switzerland and Finland
were US$ 86 and US$ 72 per tonne, respectively. However, India’s milk processing
industry is not price-competitive, which is why India needs import regulations for
dairy products (Ohlan, 2012b).
Concerning annual growth trends in production of dairy products, we note from the
available data that the production of butter and ghee has not seen any setback during
the last decade in terms of volume, which increased more than threefold, from 1.04
lakh tonnes in 1990 to 3.38 lakh tonnes in 2011. The production of skimmed milk
powder (SMP) has also exhibited a rising trend, but witnessed a marked fluctuating
trend over the last decades. It increased from 30,000 tonnes in 1990 to 90,800 tonnes
in 1996. Afterwards, it jumped from 132.93 in 1998 to its peak of 165.88 in 1999,
before declining again to 128.58 in 2001. Thereafter, it again began to grow and
reached 163.01 thousand tonnes in 2008. During 2009–11, SMP production in India
has experienced a declining trend, dropping to 132.62 million tonnes in 2011, which
may partially be due to a ban on export of SMP.
Time Yield Effect (%) Animal Effect (%) Interaction Effect (%)
1980–2011 27.86 40.62 31.52
1980–90 17.28 73.78 8.94
1991–2000 62.05 27.69 10.27
2001–11 37.80 48.52 13.68
Source: Author’s calculation.
production has not increased. It is abundantly clear, then, that to accelerate the
growth tempo of milk production, India urgently needs to increase the number of
dairy animals and their yield. While milk production in India has overall increased
significantly during the last three decades, there remains much room for qualitative
improvement. Additionally, it is imperative to understand the regional patterns of
milk supply growth in India.
Table 6 Compound Annual Growth Rates of Milk Production in Major Milk Producing
States, 1981–2010
registered a growth rate of less than 3 per cent. During the 2000s, the number of states
that witnessed less than 3 per cent growth rates increased from 5 during the 1990s
to 11 during the 2000s. These include: Uttaranchal (2.7 per cent), West Bengal (2.5
per cent), Tamil Nadu (2.4 per cent), Punjab (2.3 per cent), Haryana (2 per cent),
Chhattisgarh (2 per cent), Jammu & Kashmir (1.9 per cent), Himachal Pradesh (1.8
per cent), Assam (1.2 per cent), Karnataka (0 per cent) and Kerala (–0.8 per cent).
As noted above, the compound annual growth rate at the national level is recorded at
4.5 per cent. In Madhya Pradesh (4.4 per cent), Uttar Pradesh (4.3 per cent), Rajasthan
(3.2 per cent) and Maharashtra (3 per cent), the milk production growth rate was
between 3 to 5 per cent. Only Bihar (12.1 per cent), Orissa (8.4 per cent), Andhra
Pradesh (7 per cent), Jharkhand (6.6 per cent) and Gujarat (5.6 per cent) recorded
more than 5 per cent compound annual growth rate. The average annual growth rate
of milk production is higher in eastern states and lower in northern states. Overall,
the above discussion confirms that the growth rate of milk production in India has
been sluggish during recent years.
The average per capita milk availability remains lower in eastern and southern states
and higher in northern states. This may partially be attributable to (a) food habits,
(b) density of bovine population, (c) agricultural practices and (d) human population
pressure. The average per capita availability of milk during the triennium ending
in 2010 was highest in Punjab (952 gm/day), followed by Haryana (642 gm/day),
Gujarat (402 gm/day), Rajasthan (401 gm/day), Jammu & Kashmir (377 gm/day),
Uttaranchal (364 gm/day), Himachal Pradesh (357 gm/day), Andhra Pradesh (319
gm/day) and Uttar Pradesh (278 gm/day). Only nine states had higher than national
per capita availability of milk.
According to official figures (NSSO, 2011), in 2009–10 the average per capita
expenditure on consumption of milk and dairy products was lower in rural areas
(`80.55) as compared to urban areas (`137.01). This may partially be due to lower
prices of milk and lower per capita incomes in rural areas. However, the relative share
of milk products in the total per capita monthly expenditure in rural areas (7.64
per cent) is likely to be higher than in urban areas (6.9 per cent), also given the larger
presence of the informal sector at that level. Generally, these results indicate considerable
disparities in the level of milk production and per capita availability across different
states, and they are consistent with an earlier study (Sharma, 2004).
However, the level of per capita milk availability provides only a statistical picture,
which is not likely to be directly valid for any group of people. It is therefore instructive
to examine the extent of inequality in dairy products consumption. This was analysed
by the author using the Gini coefficient and Robin Hood Index. Again, details of
this are not provided here and may be obtained from the author. It was found that
inequality in dairy products consumption was higher in rural areas than in urban
areas. A comparison of Gini coefficients from the 2009–10 survey with those obtained
from the survey of 2004–05 brought out that intersection disparity in dairy products
consumption slightly declined in both rural and urban areas of India over the last
decade, but the gap was still wide.
155.3 million to 175.1 million during the same period. A decline in the total cattle
population has been observed during 1992–2003, however. Notably, this was mainly
due to a reduction in the population of male cattle, probably due to increasing
mechanisation of agriculture in India.
Right since 1970, when the ‘Operation Flood’ programme was introduced by
India’s National Dairy Development Board (NDDB), the share of adult female
cattle in the total cattle population has exhibited a rising trend (Gautam & Pathak,
2010), confirming the importance given to maintaining adult female cattle for milk
production. The adult female cattle population grew by almost 0.6 per cent per year
between 1951 and 2007, while the adult female buffalo population grew more than
four times faster (2.8 per cent per year) during the same period. The adult female
buffalo stock witnessed a particularly significant acceleration in growth tempo (4.06
per cent per year) during 1982 to 1987. The rate of increase in the adult female cattle
(3.29 per cent per year) population was highest between 2003 and 2007 among all
the periods considered. It appears that the importance of adult female buffaloes in
the Indian dairy sector is increasing. The buffalo share in the total bovine population
increased from 11 per cent in 1951 to 18 per cent in 2007. On average, the total
livestock population has grown faster than the bovine population, whose share in total
livestock population has come down from 68 per cent in 1951 to 57 per cent in 2007.
Ohlan (2013b) observed that in 2009–10, India’s major milk species were buffalo
(53 per cent), cow (43.3 per cent) and goat (3.7 per cent). While buffaloes yield less
milk than crossbred cows, the buffalo population recorded a faster growth rate than
cattle. Nevertheless, the faster increase in yield from increasing adoption of crossbreed
cows has resulted in the relative share of cows and buffaloes remaining constant. Based
on the foregoing analysis, it may be argued that adoption of crossbred cows can provide
a valuable growth momentum to milk output in India. It may be added here that
milch animal holding is far more equitable than land holding and, as noted, the cost
of milk production by smallholders in India remains competitive. Overall, it may be
concluded here that in order to foster the growth of milk production in India, there
is an urgent need for increase in the growth rate of female cattle.
average annual growth rate of milk production in eastern states has been increasing and
has outpaced that of northern states during the last decade. Nonetheless, the average per
capita milk availability is still lower in eastern and southern states and higher in northern
states. This implies untapped milk growth potentials in eastern and southern regions,
suggesting that especially in the eastern region, milk production may still be increased.
Finally, we observe that in recent years, the growth tempo of the adult female cattle
population has declined while that of the adult female buffalo population has improved.
Overall, the share of bovines has declined while that of bovines has increased during
the last five and a half decades (see also Ali & Pappa, 2015). Significantly, the male
bovine population has declined whereas the number of productive female bovines
has increased, showing a shift towards bovines as milch animals. Faster adoption of
crossbred cows may further augment the supply of milk in India. The implication
is that there is an urgent need to develop a long-term appropriate breeding policy.
The article also identified that the utilisation patterns of milk in India is very
different from that in many Western countries, the primary reason being conventional
dietary habits of Indian households. Consumption of milk in India is skewed towards
liquid milk, with around 46 per cent of milk consumed in liquid form, while around
50 per cent of total milk production is converted into various dairy products and only
4 per cent of total milk production is used for Western dairy products.
Regarding the benefits of milk consumption, an important further policy connection
is made here regarding the provision of milk for school children. It is well known that
with a view of achieving universal primary education of satisfactory quality for all
schoolchildren below the age of 14, enhancing enrolment, retention, attendance and
simultaneously improving nutritional levels is a desirable policy. India runs Midday
Meal Schemes for primary schoolchildren, mainly through government-owned schools.
It is widely documented that government-run schools in India are dominated by
children from low-income families, girls, low caste children and other underprivileged
children (Aggarwal, 2000; Kumar et al., 2005: 1551). In order to reduce inequities,
including the inequality in dairy product consumption across various income levels,
milk and milk products should be included in the diet provided through the Midday
Meal Scheme under the National Programme of Nutritional Support to Primary
Education. This would help to alleviate malnutrition among children in India.
Finally, it may be added here that the world dairy market is very thin, as 86 per
cent of the world’s milk production does not enter international trade (Ohlan, 2012c).
Based on the present findings, it may be suggested that to meet the growing domestic
demand of an increasing population for milk and milk products, the Government of
India should continue to focus on sustained growth of milk production. To increase
overall milk supply in India and speed up dairy product generation, Ohlan (2012c)
earlier suggested several key measures which have lost none of their relevance:
(1) increase in the adoption of crossbreed cows, (2) developing farmers’ own milk
processing and packaging capacity, (3) developing dairy hubs for smallholder farmers,
(4) remunerative prices to milk producers, (5) strengthening and expanding village-level
infrastructure for milk procurement, (6) providing milk producers greater access to the
market in the dairy sector, (7) use of scientific practices, (8) strengthening infrastructure
for quality and clean milk production, (9) upgrading of veterinary health services,
(10) improvements in fertility, (11) adequate availability of feed and fodder in all
seasons and (12) building market institutions to commercialise dairy production.
Notes
1. One lakh is 100,000.
2. On changing household consumption patterns, see Mathew and Goyari (2011).
3. Even if one considers the supply of synthetic milk, prepared by emulsifying vegetable oils
with appropriate amounts of detergent and urea products in Indian dairy markets, it may be
concluded that India has not yet achieved self-sufficiency in milk production despite being
a net exporter.
4. One crore is 10 million.
References
Aggarwal, Y. (2000) Primary Education in Delhi: How Much Do the Children Learn? New Delhi:
National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration.
Ali, J. (2007) ‘Structural Changes in Food Consumption and Nutritional Intake from Livestock
Products in India’, South Asia Research, 27(2): 137–51.
Ali, J. & Pappa, E. (2015) ‘Global Meat Market: Structural Changes Across Geographical
Regions’, South Asia Research, 35(2): 143–57.
Gandhi, V. P. & Zhou, Z. (2010) ‘Rising Demand for Livestock Products in India: Nature,
Patterns and Implications’, Australasian Agribusiness Review, 18(7): 103–35.
Gautam, D. R. S. & Pathak, V. (2010) ‘Indian Dairy Sector: Time to Revisit Operation Flood’,
Livestock Science, 127(3): 164–75.
Government of India (2011) Annual Report-2011–12. New Delhi: Department of Animal
Husbandry, Dairying & Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture.
——— (2012a) Report of the Working Group on Animal Husbandry & Dairying 12th Five Year
Plan (2012–17). New Delhi: Planning Commission.
——— (2012b) Basic Animal Husbandry Statistics, 2012. New Delhi: Department of Animal
Husbandry and Dairying, Ministry of Agriculture.
Gupta, P. R. (2007) Dairy India Yearbook 2007. New Delhi: Rama KrM.
Jones, E., Akbay, C., Roe, B. & Chern, W. S. (2003) ‘Analyses of Consumers’ Dietary Behaviour:
An Application of the AIDS Model to Supermarket Scanner Data’, Agribusiness, 19(2):
203–21.
Kumar, R., Santra, S., Mukherjee, A., Banerjee, T. & Kundu, M. (2005) ‘Public-Private Interface
in Primary Education: A Case Study of West Bengal’, Economic and Political Weekly, 40(15)
(9 April): 1550–5.
Mathew, S. S. & Goyari, P. (2011) ‘Working Women Households and Time-saving Consumption:
Evidence from Kerala’, South Asia Research, 31(2): 119–34.
NSSO (2011) Level and Pattern of Consumer Expenditure (Report No. 538 (66/1.0/1)). New
Delhi: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India.
NSSO (2012) Nutritional Intake in India (Report No. 540 (66/1.0/2)). New Delhi: Department
of Statistics, Government of India.
OECD/FAO (2012) OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2012–2021. Paris: OECD Publishing
and FAO.
Ohlan, R. (2011) ‘Productivity and Efficiency Analysis of Haryana’s Dairy Industry’, Productivity,
52(1): 42–50.
——— (2012a) ‘Global Competitiveness in Dairy Sector’, Agricultural Situation in India,
59(5): 215–23.
——— (2012b) ‘Globalization and World Dairy Trade: An Assessment’, The Journal of World
Investment and Trade, 13(1): 76–102.
——— (2012c) Globalization and Competitiveness of Indian Dairy Sector. (Major Research
Project Report No. 5–579(1)/2009 (HRP)). New Delhi: University Grants Commission.
——— (2013a) ‘Pattern of Regional Disparities in Socio-economic Development in India:
District Level Analysis’, Social Indicators Research, 114(3): 841–73.
——— (2013b) ‘Efficiency and Total Factor Productivity Growth in Indian Dairy Sector’,
Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 52(1): 51–77.
——— (2014a) ‘Growth and Instability in Dairy Production and Trade: A Global Analysis’,
International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 7(2): 145–72.
——— (2014b) ‘Competitiveness and Trade Performance of India’s Dairy Industry’, Asian
Journal of Agriculture and Development, 11(2): 17–37.
Rakotoarisoa, M. & Gulati, A. (2006) ‘Competitiveness and Trade Potential of India’s Dairy
Industry’, Food Policy, 31(3): 216–27.
Sarkar, S. (2008) ‘Innovations in Indian Fermented Milk Products: A Review’, Food Biotechnology,
22(1): 78–97.
Sharma, V. (2004) ‘Livestock Economy of India: Current Status, Emerging Issues and Long-
term Prospects’, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59(3): 513–54.
Tripathi, A. & Srivastava, S. (2011) ‘Interstate Migration and Changing Food Preferences in
India’, Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 50(5): 410–28.
Verma, M. R., Datta, K. K., Mandal, S. & Tripathi, A. K. (2007) ‘Diversification of Food
Production and Consumption Patterns in India’, Journal of Agricultural & Food Information,
8(3): 87–100.
Wiley, A. S. (2011) ‘Milk for “Growth”: Global and Local Meanings of Milk Consumption
in China, India, and the United States’, Food and Foodways: Explorations in the History and
Culture of Human Nourishment, 19(1–2): 11–33.