Alemu
Alemu
Alemu
BY:ALEMU ZEBENE
ID NO: 5327/17
ADVISOR: ROBEL H.
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT
DILLA UNIVERSITY
JANUARY,2020
DILLA, Ethiopia
TABLE OF CONTENT
Content pages
TABLE OF CONTENT.....................................................................................................................................i
CHAPTER ONE........................................................................................................................................1
1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................1
1.1 Background of the study....................................................................................................................1
1.2.1 Research question.......................................................................................................................4
1.3. Objective of the study.......................................................................................................................5
1.3.1. General Objective......................................................................................................................5
1.3.2. Specific Objective......................................................................................................................5
1.4. Significance of the study..................................................................................................................5
1.5. Scope of the study.............................................................................................................................5
CHAPTER THREE.....................................................................................................................................6
3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................................6
3.1. Research design and strategy...........................................................................................................6
3.2. Data source and type........................................................................................................................6
3.3. Population of the study....................................................................................................................6
3.4. Sampling and sample size.................................................................................................................6
3.6. Method of data analysis...................................................................................................................6
4. Work plan and cost budget..................................................................................................................7
4.1. Work plan.........................................................................................................................................7
4.2. Cost budget plan...........................................................................................................................8
REFERENCE..............................................................................................................................................9
i
CHAPTER ONE
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the study
The first formal theory of entrepreneurship was developed by Richard cotillion in 1725.the
defined entrepreneurship as self-employed person and bearing the risk of buying at a certain
price and selling at uncertain price. However, in 1803 the definition of entrepreneurship was
brooded to include the concept of bringing the factor of product together (chenetal, 2001)
entrepreneurship is an interaction process of entrepreneur’s rational decision making and
entrepreneurial spirit after the recognition of opportunity (Zhangan and yang, 2006)
Entrepreneurship a worldwide phenomenon with economic growth across the global positively
impacted by the emergency of new and innovative business startup, these new small business
plays a significant role in job creation, influencing politician to recognize and support
entrepreneurial, startup activity due to its positive contribution to the economy, historically
economist have supported the view that entrepreneurship is responsible for economic expansion
(cole, 1965 and weber, 1930), due to its association with profit orientation, capital investment
and creation of new market(Cantillon, 1755 and schumpter, 1934). A deeper understanding of
the competencies enabling university students to successfully lead entrepreneurial inclination
among university students (Beghri and pihit, 2011).Entrepreneurship education in process
motivation towards being entrepreneurial by inspiring students ‘persona attraction to wards
entrepreneurship and perceived behavioral control (Dugassa, 2012). It would be interesting to
follow entrepreneurial in a group of student over longer period of time in order to establish some
understanding of the predictive capability of entrepreneurial desire and future business
orientation (taatilaand Down, 2012). Diversify of educational back ground on the basic of
department officer’s possible explanation on the different of entrepreneurial perception of
university under graduating students (Wu and Wu, 2008). Students are more likely to formulate
the choice of starting entrepreneurship.
1
When they successfully feel, recognized evaluate their own and their interest (Zampetakis,
2009). Motivating university students towards culture of entrepreneurship and innovation can
have impact both locally and internationally under graduate students who pursue their own ideas
through entrepreneurship are more likely to find satisfaction in their careers, as well as impacting
job creation externally (ecdigetal, 2010)
2
other investigators exploring inother directions. It found that the intention to become an
entrepreneur mainly depended on personal attractiontowards entrepreneurship, perceived social
norms and perceived feasibility (self-efficacy). Achievement motivation and self-image have
likewise emerged as major contributory factors (Pillis& Reardon, 2007).
In this study, the researcher is interested in how people with an academic degree perceive
entrepreneurship as a personalcareer alternative. It is widely accepted that the educational system
of universities has to provide an academicenvironment that serve as a catalyst for high-
technology start-ups. The universities shall be fosteringinnovations and new product
development through entrepreneurship as primary task of universities. Lessresearch has focused
on the factors which deter students from engaging in creating own business.Additionally, lack of
finance has appeared as a major entrepreneurship barrier in many cases (Wilson,
Brown,Anderson &Galloway, 2003).
Both policy makers and scholars should concentrate on the question of why some people choose
an entrepreneurial career and others do not. The previous studies in the literature provide some
alternative explanations for this question. Some scholars primarily focus on the effect of
personality characteristics on decision making process. Although the results vary across the
studies, they often indicate a link between entrepreneurial intention and some personality factors,
such as self-confidence, risk-taking ability, need to achievement, and locus of control. However,
a person is surrounded by an extended range of cultural, social, economical, political,
demographical, and technological factors.
Consequently, there is a need for many entrepreneurs to be involved actively in the economic
development in order to meet the market demands and to sustain competency in the fast pace of
technology change. The assessment of entrepreneurial intention among the university students is
a necessity in order to identify their level of entrepreneurial orientation. This group of people is
very crucial as the springboard or backup to the current entrepreneurs in Ethiopia’s high-tech
industries. A majority of these students will immediately contribute more to the economic
growth after they graduate, not as salary workers but as entrepreneurs.
3
1.2.1 Research question
In this study researchers tried to answer the following research questions.
How ready graduating students are to start new business?
Whatthe intension of students is after graduated and factors limit the students from
starting their own new business?
What type of environment is comfortable andkinds of support are needed from
government and society to start a new business?
4
1.3. Objective of the study
5
CHAPTER THREE
3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1. Research design and strategy
For the purpose of the study to achieve the objective the researcher will use descriptive type of
research because it describes the existing phenomena and state of affair regarding the perception
of starting entrepreneurial life.
Secondary data will collect from relevant books and internet that are relevant for the study.
6
CHAPTER FOUR
4. Work plan and cost budget
1. Problem
Identification
2. Topic Selection
3. Proposal Writing
4. Proposal Summation
5. Proposal Paper
Defense
6. Data Collection
Process
9. Paper Presentation
7
4.2. Cost budget plan
s.no description of items unit quantity unit cost in unit total cost
birr
1 secretary Page 35 7 245.00
2 Papers pack 1 180 180.00
3 Pen Piece 1 10 10.00
4 Pencil Piece 1 5 5.00
5 Ruler Piece 1 5 4.00
6 binding cost Piece 2 12 24.00
sub total 668.00
contingency 10% 66.80
grand total 534.80
8
REFERENCE
A.H cole: Entrepreneurship and small business management (1986).