Medical Law, Ethics, & Bioethics For The Health Professions. ISBN 9780803627062, 978-0803627062
Medical Law, Ethics, & Bioethics For The Health Professions. ISBN 9780803627062, 978-0803627062
Medical Law, Ethics, & Bioethics For The Health Professions. ISBN 9780803627062, 978-0803627062
Visit the link below to download the full version of this book:
https://cheaptodownload.com/product/medical-law-ethics-bioethics-for-the-health-
professions-7th-edition-full-pdf-download/
2706_fm_i-xvi 11/01/12 11:42 AM Page ii
F. A. Davis Company
1915 Arch Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
www.fadavis.com
Copyright © 1983, 1988, 1993, 1998, 2002, and 2007 by F. A. Davis Company. All rights
reserved. This product is protected by copyright. No part of it may be reproduced, stored in a
retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photo-
copying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission from the publisher.
As new scientific information becomes available through basic and clinical research, recom-
mended treatments and drug therapies undergo changes. The author(s) and publisher have
done everything possible to make this book accurate, up to date, and in accord with accepted
standards at the time of publication. The author(s), editors, and publisher are not responsible
for errors or omissions or for consequences from application of the book, and make no war-
ranty, expressed or implied, in regard to the contents of the book. Any practice described in
this book should be applied by the reader in accordance with professional standards of care
used in regard to the unique circumstances that may apply in each situation. The reader is
advised always to check product information (package inserts) for changes and new informa-
tion regarding dose and contraindications before administering any drug. Caution is especially
urged when using new or infrequently ordered drugs.
Lewis, Marcia A.
Medical law, ethics & bioethics for the health professions / Marcia (Marti) Lewis, Carol D.
Tamparo, Brenda M. Tatro. — 7th ed. Proudly sourced and uploaded by [StormRG]
p. cm. Kickass Torrents | TPB | ET | h33t
Medical law, ethics, and bioethics for the health professions
Rev. ed. of: Medical law, ethics, and bioethics for the health professions. 6th ed. c2002.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-8036-2706-2 (pbk. : alk. paper)
1. Medical laws and legislation—United States. 2. Ambulatory medical care—Law and
legislation—United States. 3. Medical ethics—United States. I. Tamparo, Carol D., 1940-
II. Tatro, Brenda M. III. Lewis, Marcia A. Medical law, ethics, and bioethics for the health pro-
fessions. IV. Title. V. Title: Medical law, ethics, and bioethics for the health professions.
[DNLM: 1. Ambulatory Care—legislation & jurisprudence—United States. 2. Ethics, Clinical—
United States. WB 33 AA1]
KF3821.L485 2012
344.7304'1—dc23
2011025925
Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of
specific clients, is granted by F. A. Davis Company for users registered with the Copyright Clear-
ance Center (CCC) Transactional Reporting Service, provided that the fee of $.25 per copy is paid
directly to CCC, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. For those organizations that have
been granted a photocopy license by CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged. The
fee code for users of the Transactional Reporting Service is: 8036-2706-2/12 0 + $.25.
2706_fm_i-xvi 11/01/12 11:42 AM Page iii
PREFACE
It is imperative that any health-care professional have knowledge of medical law, ethics, and bioethics
so that clients are treated with understanding, sensitivity, and compassion. No matter what the pro-
fessional’s education, experience, or position, any client contact involves ethical and legal responsi-
bility. It also is imperative that this knowledge be used to provide the best possible service for the
provider and employer. Our goal is to provide the health-care professional with an adequate resource
for the study of medical law, ethics, and bioethics.
Although the material is applicable to all health-care professionals in any setting, our emphasis
continues to be on the ambulatory health-care setting rather than on the hospital or long-term-care
setting. For example, we do not address such legal and bioethical issues as whether to feed an anen-
cephalic newborn in the neonatal center of the hospital. We realize, however, that all the bioethical
issues affect ambulatory health-care personnel directly or indirectly. Continued enthusiastic feed-
back from instructors, students, and reviewers is gratifying and has resulted in many changes that
will make this Seventh Edition more useful than the first six. We are reminded of the truth, which
comes from our colleagues in community and technical colleges, that no matter how many times a
piece is written, it can always be improved.
The continuing evolution of health care, of legal and, especially, bioethical issues, necessitates
this revision. The material has been updated throughout to reflect the latest developments and
emerging ethical issues. The newest developments in stem cell research for treating disease and for
creating new organs and tissue are included in the Genetic Engineering chapter as the legal and eth-
ical debate “rages.” The chapter introducing the reader to the cultural perspectives of health care
continues to heighten one’s awareness of the importance of culture in health care. The chapter on
reproductive health issues has been greatly enhanced. Abortion is still covered as an important ele-
ment in reproductive health, but many new topics have been added.
The authors and their editors have made every attempt to ensure currency and pertinence of the
material. However, some bioethical issues change almost daily as lawmakers and the public become
actively involved and press for legislation. Even as this edition goes into production, the coauthors
struggle to be current as federal and state legislations clash. Furthermore, funding and morality is-
sues are being addressed in the political arena, sometimes bringing research and advancement in
medicine to a standstill. For ease of reference, pertinent codes of ethics appear in Appendix I.
Appendix II offers samples of some of the legal documents clients may use in implementing deci-
sions about health care, life, and death.
A thought-provoking vignette appears in each chapter. The vignettes are adapted from case law
or from actual situations. Learning outcomes designed for the educational setting precede each
chapter. The Seventh Edition places case studies throughout the chapters. The case studies are for
reflection rather than a test of chapter contents. CAAHEP and ABHES competencies also appear at
the beginning of each chapter to help students and faculty identify competencies necessary for ac-
creditation and certification in the content area of medical law and ethics.
For students’ benefit, we have included questions for review at the end of each chapter for increased
learning. Classroom exercises and Internet activities will whet the appetite, stimulate discussion, and
highlight the most pressing legal, ethical, and bioethical issues faced by ambulatory care employees.
Lastly, Web resources are provided to help the reader in further research on the Internet.
DavisPlus offers many additional resources and exercises for both the student and the instructor.
Videos are available for classroom use or small-group discussions. The videos will require students
to put themselves in the place of making legal and ethical decisions.
iv
2706_fm_i-xvi 11/01/12 11:42 AM Page v
Preface v
“Have a Care!” has been updated. It continues to be one of the most popular pieces of this text-
book. Because nearly every person has a “Have a Care” moment in his or her life and experiences
with the medical community, it is our hope that it will always be a part of any upcoming edition.
However, this particular “Have a Care” ends with the death of Marcia (Marti) Lewis, the primary
person in this story. It took much courage for Marti to agree to its inclusion in the First Edition,
but gradually in subsequent editions she was more comfortable revealing herself as the main char-
acter and allowing the readers to fully experience her frustration and discomfort.
A new author has been added for this edition. It is not easy to come into an already established
author relationship (especially where one is grieving the loss of the other) and make one’s mark.
Brenda Tatro did so with grace, understanding, humor, and the willingness to interject a new di-
mension into the writing.
We hope that from this book you will derive a great sense of pride for your professional position
in health care.
Marti A. Lewis
Carol D. Tamparo
Brenda M. Tatro
OF SPECIAL NOTE
The term “provider” rather than “physician” has been used throughout the text unless the reference
is directly that of a medical doctor (MD) or a doctor of osteopathy (DO) This change is made to re-
flect the increasing numbers of other providers giving primary care. Also, the term “client” continues
to be used in preference to “patient.” The term patient is reserved for an individual receiving care in
a hospital. It is also a term that denotes an “unequal” relationship between two individuals—doctor
and patient or provider and patient. The best of medical care today places emphasis upon the par-
ticipation of the person receiving the care; therefore, “client” becomes the appropriate term. It may
be helpful to recognize that the majority of nursing texts use the term client rather than patient for
the same reasons.
2706_fm_i-xvi 11/01/12 11:42 AM Page vi
REVIEWERS
vi
2706_fm_i-xvi 11/01/12 11:43 AM Page vii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
It is never possible to acknowledge all the people who make contributions to the authors of a book.
Completing a book requires assistance from so many individuals and sources. We wish to thank,
however, a few who were especially helpful. Without them, the book would have been impossible to
create.
F.A. Davis has a fine cadre of individuals who make a writing project pleasant. Each individual’s
desire for excellence and thoroughness helps to create the final product. Margaret Biblis, Publisher,
and Andy McPhee, Senior Acquisitions Editor, refresh our thoughts and goals with new ideas and
discerning eyes. With the assistance of Julie Munden, Developmental Editor; Yvonne N. Gillam, De-
velopmental Editor; and George W. Lang, Manager of Content Development, our thoughts, ideas,
text, and presentation have all been pulled together into the book you hold in your hands. Elizabeth
Stepchin, Developmental Associate, monitors our budget and provides direction and support as nec-
essary. All these people have been positive, encouraging, and helpful to us in all matters. Our rela-
tionship with F.A. Davis for over 33 years has always been one of high professionalism and integrity.
Students continually offer critical thought and information on legal, ethical, and bioethical issues
and act as a sounding board for all ideas. Their input and comments have influenced this product.
Students continue to be our inspiration and the reason for this book!
The support of families and friends has been an essential ingredient from the inception of the
First Edition to the completion of this Seventh Edition. Thanks to Tom Tamparo, Jayne Bloomberg,
and Duuana Warden and their families. Many thanks to Dick Tatro, Kim Perry, Mike Tatro, Matt
Tatro, and their families. They relinquished their time with us so we could write. Lester and Martiann
Lewis remained supportive throughout the writing of this edition as well. These family members
and dear friends provided encouragement when we were discouraged and celebrated with us when
we were successful. Thanks; we love you all!
vii
2706_fm_i-xvi 11/01/12 11:43 AM Page viii
2706_fm_i-xvi 11/01/12 11:43 AM Page ix
CONTENTS IN BRIEF
SPECIAL SECTION
Have a Care! 246
APPENDICES
Appendix I Code of Ethics 250
Appendix II Sample Documents for End of Life Issues 253
INDEX 263
ix
2706_fm_i-xvi 11/01/12 11:43 AM Page x
2706_fm_i-xvi 11/01/12 11:43 AM Page xi
CONTENTS
xi
2706_fm_i-xvi 11/01/12 11:43 AM Page xii
xii Contents
Contents xiii
xiv Contents
Contents xv
UNIT I
Understanding
the Basics
CHAPTER 1
Medical Law, Ethics, and Bioethics
CHAPTER 2
Medical Practice Management
CHAPTER 3
Health-Care Team in the Ambulatory
Setting
1
2706_Ch01_001-013 07/01/12 4:32 PM Page 2
CHAPTER 1
KEY TERMS
hospitalist Individual who assumes the care of hospitalized individuals in place of their primary care
provider.
internal milieu Internal environment.
pluralistic Referring to numerous distinct ethnic, religious, and cultural groups that coexist in society.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Upon successful completion of this chapter, you will be able to:
1.1 Define key terms.
1.2 Compare medical law, ethics, and bioethics.
1.3 Discuss some bioethical issues in medicine.
1.4 Explain the importance of medical law, ethics, and bioethics in the practice of medicine.
1.5 List and discuss at least three ethical codes.
1.6 Describe the American Association of Medical Assistants (AAMA) Code of Ethics.
1.7 Interpret the AAMA Creed.
1.8 Compare/contrast the AAMA and the American Medical Association (AMA) codes of ethics.
1.9 Describe the Patient Bill of Rights.
1.10 Explain the Ethics Check questions.
1.11 Describe characteristics that are important for a professional health-care employee.
COMPETENCIES
COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF ALLIED HEALTH EDUCATION PROGRAMS
(CAAHEP)
• Summarize the Patient Bill of Rights. (CAAHEP IX.C.4)
• Differentiate between legal, ethical, and moral issues affecting health care. (CAAHEP X.C.1)
• Compare personal, professional, and organizational ethics. (CAAHEP X.C.2)
• Identify the effect personal ethics may have on professional performance. (CAAHEP X.C.5)
• Incorporate the Patient’s Bill of Rights into personal practice and medical office policies and
procedures. (CAAHEP IX.P.5)
2
2706_Ch01_001-013 07/01/12 4:32 PM Page 3
• Develop a plan for separation of personal and professional ethics. (CAAHEP X.P.2)
• Apply ethical behaviors, including honesty/integrity in performance of medical assisting practice.
(CAAHEP X.A.1)
• Examine the impact personal ethics and morals may have on the individual’s practice.
(CAAHEP X.A.2)
ACCREDITING BUREAU OF HEALTH EDUCATION SCHOOLS (ABHES)
• Being cognizant of ethical boundaries. (ABHES 11.b.4)
• Analyze the effect of hereditary, cultural and environmental influences. (ABHES 5.g)
The title of this text, Medical Law, Ethics, and Bioethics for the Health Professions, presents three
distinct topics: medical law, ethics, and bioethics. Such distinction, however, is for the sake of clarity.
Discussion of any one of these topics will include the others. Any study of health law will surface
themes of ethics and bioethics. Conversely, discussing ethics and bioethics without considering the
law is futile.
LAW
Laws are societal rules or regulations that are prudent or obligatory to observe. Failure to observe
the law is punishable by the government and/or law enforcement agencies. Laws are designed to
protect the welfare and safety of society and to resolve conflicts in an orderly and nonviolent manner.
They constantly evolve in accordance with an increasingly pluralistic society. Laws have governed
humankind and the practice of medicine for thousands of years. Today federal and state govern-
ments have constitutional authority to create and enforce laws. A brief look at these laws, their
sources, and their definitions appears in subsequent chapters.
Medical law is essential in regulating licensure of health-care professionals and institutions, pro-
viding for client safety, protecting the client-provider relationship, and identifying liability for
health-care professionals and institutions. Health law also regulates insurance and managed care
as well as federal public health programs. It also has established standards for reproduction and
birth issues as well as life and death decisions.
ETHICS
Ethics is a set of moral standards or a code for behavior to govern an individual’s interactions with
other individuals and within society. Joseph Fletcher (1905–1991), an American professor who pio-
neered in the field of bioethics, differentiates morals from ethics, stating, “‘morality’ is what people
do in fact believe to be right and good, while ‘ethics’ is a critical reflection about morality and the
2706_Ch01_001-013 07/01/12 4:32 PM Page 4
rational analysis of it.” According to Fletcher, for example, “Should I terminate pregnancy?” is a
moral question, whereas “How should I go about deciding?” is an ethical concern.
Although laws are more apt to be rules applied to and observed by all, different cultures have
different moral codes. Cultural differences exist relative to age, gender, sexual orientation, ethnic
heritage, educational preparation, life experiences, spiritual influences, role models and mentors,
economics, values, internal milieu, and health and illness. Every standard for ethics is culture-bound.
Therefore, there are few if any universal truths in ethics because it is difficult to identify customs as
being either correct or incorrect. It is also true that one person’s moral code has no special status
relative to another person’s moral code; it is only one among many. See Chapter 12, A Cultural Per-
spective for Health Professionals, for further discussion on the influence of culture.
Ethical standards can be personal, organizational, institutional, or worldwide. Ethics refers to
the various codes of conduct that have been established through the years by members of many pro-
fessional organizations, including the medical profession. A number of medical codes appear in the
appendices and on DavisPlus.
BIOETHICS
Bioethics refers to the ethical implications of biomedical technology and its practices. Bio refers to
life, and issues in bioethics are often life-and-death issues. Edmund D. Pellegrino, Professor Emeritus
of Medicine and Medical Ethics at Georgetown University, states that “bioethics, still in its infancy,
is routinely called on by the government to provide political cover for controversial public health
decisions involving the life and death of Americans.” In other words, political leaders often look to
bioethical discussions to guide them in making decisions regarding controversial public health
issues. Specialists in the field of bioethics provide the platform for this decision making.
Since former President Clinton established a National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC)
in 1995, subsequent presidents have established their own commission to provide input to the pres-
ident and national leaders on issues of bioethics. In April 2010, President Barack Obama appointed
members to his Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. Obama mandated that
this Commission address potential bioethical issues through advancements in biomedicine and
“related areas of science and technology.” The Commission plays a key role in keeping the President
informed about bioethical issues.
The challenge to bioethics created by modern medicine and research in the past few decades is
staggering. Rapid changes in medicine and technology offer unique and sometimes overwhelming
choices to clients and their families. Consumers more actively involved in their health care and quite
knowledgeable of medical technology and its implications question medical professionals as they
have never before been questioned. The public carefully scrutinizes medical technology and how it
relates to their daily lives. Thus, the application of bioethics in everyday life provides opportunities,
challenges, enthusiasm, and sometimes difficult choices.
is to be performed. During the third trimester, the state’s interests override pregnant women’s rights
to abortions, and the state may deny abortion except when necessary to preserve the health or life
of the mother.
The personal ethics of a provider or health-care professional may dictate nonparticipation in an
abortion or any abortion-related activities. Bioethics and the allocation of scarce resources are evi-
denced by some state statutes that have denied the use of state funds for an abortion or strive to
make abortions less available. As demonstrated by this example, sometimes law, ethics, and bioethics
conflict.
IN THE NEWS
As a result of two U.S. Supreme Court rulings that prohibit parents from having
absolute veto over their daughters’ decision to have an abortion, many state
legislatures rushed to tighten controls on abortions. As of 2011, only Washington, Oregon,
New York, Vermont, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maine, and Washington DC had no parental notifi-
cation or consent laws related to minors seeking abortion (see Fig. 1-1). Thirty-six states re-
quire some involvement in a minor’s decision; 22 states require parental consent, 10 states
require only parental notification, and 4 states require both parental consent and notification.
This information changes yearly as state legislative bodies struggle to exercise control over
abortions in their state. Sometimes, such legislation is later overturned by the U.S. Supreme
Court. Legal attempts continue the move to rescind Roe v Wade.
AK
WA
MT VT ME
ND
OR MN MI
ID NH MA
SD WI NY
WY MI CT
RI
IA PA
NV NE NJ
IL IN OH
CA DE
UT CO MD
WV
KS MO VA DC
KY
NC
TN
AZ OK
NM AR SC
MI AL GA
TX LA
HI
FL
Figure 1-1. U.S. map showing states requiring no parent notification and/or consent for a minor’s abortion.
In addition, there are political and economic factors that are relevant to the importance of medical
law, ethics, and bioethics. They include:
• Demands of society for quality health care at minimal personal cost
• The debate over whether health care is a right or a privilege
• The equality of the distribution of and access to emerging medical technology
• The controversy among the political arena, national health-care reform, and the consumer
over who pays for health care and how it is paid
• The powerful role of medical insurance and managed care.
Thoughtful consideration of the reasons identified here as well as the political and economic
factors fosters mature decision making and quality health care for clients.
Although specialization may enhance quality health care, it demands greater coordination
for clients to benefit, and it increases the cost of medical care. Managed care policies and
providers will in part dictate how medical choices are made.
• Costs of medical care have risen exponentially. In 1940, a normal infant delivery cost
$35 for 10 days of inpatient hospital care. The delivering physician received an additional
$35. In 1990, a normal delivery cost an average of $3300 for a 2- to 3-day inpatient hospital
stay. In 2005, hospitalization for normal delivery and a 1- to 2-day hospital stay was $5200.
The factors affecting the cost of a birth are: whether it is a vaginal or cesarean delivery, if
there are complications, and the length of the hospital stay. Infant delivery is most expen-
sive in the Northeast and on the West coast and least expensive in the South. In 2010, the
typical cost of a vaginal delivery without complications ranged from about $9000 to
$17,000 or more. The typical cost for a cesarean delivery without complications or a vaginal
delivery with complications ranged from $14,000 to $25,000 or more.
The importance of these issues is further evidenced by the struggle that has been made through
the past couple of decades to pass some form of a national health-care reform in the nation’s
capital. It finally happened in 2010, but not without a great deal of political maneuvering
and posturing.
CODES OF ETHICS
For generations ethical codes have been written to further clarify medical law and ethics. Many codes
have become law. Professional codes have evolved throughout history as practitioners grappled with
various ethical and bioethical issues. Increasingly, groups of medical professionals have defined how
members of their profession ought to behave. Below are a few examples.
The Hippocratic Oath (see Appendix 1), although not prominent in medical schools today, still
carries significant weight among the medical community. The oath, which was first written in the
fifth century B.C., was Christianized in the 10th or 11th century A.D. to eliminate reference to pagan
gods. The Hippocratic Oath protected the rights of clients and appealed to the inner and finer
instincts of the physician without imposing penalties.
The Geneva Convention Code of Medical Ethics, established by the World Medical Association
in 1949, is similar to the Hippocratic Oath. This code refers to colleagues as brothers and states that
religion, race, and other such factors are not a consideration for care of the total person. This code
reflects the fact that medicine was becoming available to all during this era.
The Nuremberg Code was established between 1946 and 1949 as a result of the trials of war
criminals after World War II. This code suggests guidelines for human experimentation and is