L2 复习公金 Zion
L2 复习公金 Zion
L2 复习公金 Zion
5-10%
Zion
高顿CFA研究院
Brief Introduction
Introduction of the course
Quantitative Methods 5-10%
Economics 5-10%
Financial Statement Analysis 10-15%
Corporate Issuers 5-10%
Equity Valuation 10-15%
Fixed Income 10-15%
Derivatives 5-10%
Alternative Investments 5-10%
Portfolio Management 10-15%
Ethics & Professional Standards 10-15%
2
Content:
Study session 1: Corporate Issuers
Module 1: Analysis of Dividends and Share Repurchases
(☆☆)
Module 2: Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)
Considerations in Investment Analysis (☆)
Module 3: Cost of Capital: Advanced Topics (☆☆☆)
Module 4: Capital Restructuring (☆☆☆)
3
Brief Introduction
考纲对比:
2023年的考纲与2022年相比,有三处显著变化:
删除了Capital Budgeting, Capital Structure及Mergers
and Acquisitions章节;
新增了Cost of Capital: Advanced Topics章节,考查融资成
本的计算与分析;
新增了Corporate Restructuring章节,考查公司重组行为的
评估。
4
Concept of Dividends and Dividends Policies
Dividend policy and company value theory
Ø Dividend policy does not matter (MM)
Ø It does matter: bird-in-hand argument & tax argument
Ø Other theoretical issues
ü Information signaling
ü Agency costs
Dividends Payout Policies
Tax considerations
Ø Double taxation system
ü Dividend = EBT × (1 − Tc )(1 − Ti ) × Payout%
ü Effective tax rate = Tc + (1 − Tc )Ti
• Tc : corporate tax
• Ti : individual tax on dividend
Ø Dividend imputation tax system
ü Dividend = EBT × (1 − Ti ) × Payout%
ü Effective tax rate = Ti
Answer: A
Both div. and FCFE coverage ratios are indicators of dividend safety. FCFE coverage is
simply more comprehensive measure and takes into account all cash distributed to
shareholders.
Global Variations in Ownership Structures
Introductions to global variations
Ø Dispersed vs. concentrated ownership
Ø Horizontal ownership
Ø Vertical ownership
Ø Dual-class shares
Ø Types of influential shareholders
ü Families Interlocking directorates
ü Listed SOEs
37
Cost of Capital: Advanced Topics
Bottom‐up company factors
Factors Cost of Capital
Higher sales stability/predictability Lower
Higher sales concentration Higher
Higher ESG risk Higher
Higher % of fungible, tangible and liquid assets Lower
Higher profitability and cash flow generation ability Lower
Higher liquidity and interest coverage ratio Lower
Higher leverage (operating/financial) Higher
Issuing callable debt Higher
Issuing puttable/convertible debt Lower
Issuing cumulative preferred shares Lower
Issuing common stock with inferior cash flow/voting right Higher
38
39
Cost of Debt Estimation
Synthetic credit ratings example (cont.)
Rating class Interest Coverage Ratio D/E
AAA IC > 10 times D/E < 35%
AA 8 < IC < 10 35% < D/E < 40%
A 5 < IC < 8 40% < D/E < 42%
BBB 3 < IC < 5 42% < D/E < 44%
BB 2 < IC < 3 44% < D/E < 50%
B 1.4 < IC < 2 50% < D/E < 60%
CCC 1.0 < IC < 1.4 60% < D/E < 70%
CC 0.6 < IC < 1.0 70% < D/E < 80%
C 0.3 < IC < 0.6 80% < D/E < 100%
D IC < 0.3 D/E>100%
40
41
Cost of Capital: Advanced Topics
Cost of debt estimation ‐ RIIL example
A lease has the following cash flows (in € million):
0 1 2 … 16
Lease PMT 10 10 10 10
Residual value 10
Fair Value - 120
Direct costs - 3
Net cash flows - 123 10 10 10 20
Using a calculator,
PMT = 10.0, PV = –123.0, N = 16, FV = 10.0, CPT I/Y = 3.88%
42
Advantages Disadvantages
Not a completely risk‐free
Government More closely matches
return with unknown
bond YTM infinite equity duration
coupon reinvestment rates
Government Exact estimate of the Not closely matches infinite
bill rate risk‐free rate equity duration
44
• ERP E E g r
• ERP DY Δ i g ΔS E r
• i YTM YTM
45
Cost of Capital: Advanced Topics
Limitations of the ERP estimation
Limitations
46
r g
47
Cost of Capital: Advanced Topics
Cost of equity estimation
Capital assets pricing model (CAPM)
r r β ERP
Fama–French Models
r r β ERP β SMB β HML β RMW β CMA
Expanded CAPM
r r β ERP SP IP SCRP
Build‐up approach
r r ERP SP SCRP
48
49
Practice 1
Riaz is an equity analyst at Saturn Investments. Recently he
estimates the required return for a company by using the Fama–
French models. He collected the following data
Assuming that the risk‐free rate is 4%, the cost of equity is:
A. 15.8%. B. 12.40%. C. 12.43%.
50
51
Practice 2
Which of the followings about the forward‐looking approach to
estimate an equity risk premium is least accurate?
A. The survey‐based approach can be easily trapped in recency
bias and confirmation bias.
B. The financial and economic model of macroeconomic models
can be subject to modeling errors.
C. Compared to the historical approach, the forward‐looking
approach is more easily affected by data biases.
52
53
Summary
Importance: ☆ ☆ ☆
Content:
• Calculation of cost of debt
• Calculation of equity risk premium
• Different methods used to calculate return on equity
• Cost of capital for a public and non‐public company
Exam tips:
• 常考点:自上而下和自下而上分析方法;债务成本、权益
成本和权益风险溢价的估算模型;估算上市公司和非上市
公司的资本成本的方法。
Corporate Restructuring
Tasks:
explain and evaluate types of corporate restructurings
demonstrate valuation methods for, and interpret valuations of,
companies involved in corporate restructurings
demonstrate the effect of corporate restructurings on financial
analysis
evaluate corporate investment and divestment actions
evaluate cost and balance sheet restructurings 55
Corporate Actions and Motivations
Types of corporate restructuring
Investment Divestment Restructuring
(increase size) (decrease size) (improve)
56
57
Corporate Restructuring
Restructuring
Change business model: Franchising
Cost restructuring: Reduce costs by improving operational
efficiency and profitability.
Balance sheet restructuring: Shift the asset composition,
change the capital structure, or both.
Sale leaseback
Dividend recapitalization
Reorganization: a court‐supervised restructuring process
58
60
Takeover premium
PRM
61
Corporate Restructuring
Comparable company VS. Comparable transaction
Takeover premium is
Reasonable approximation
embedded in multiples
Pros Data can be easily derived
Value estimates come from
from the market
actual transaction prices
62
63
Corporate Restructuring
Financial specifics
Pre‐Acquisition data will be shown in tables
Transaction consideration: $3,000 million
$2,000 million cash, including $1,000 million new loan
$1,000 million worth of Gordon’s shares (each share worth
$10)
64
65
Corporate Restructuring
Selected financial data
Pre‐acquisition Post‐acquisition
Gordon David Adjustment Consolidated
($Mil) ($Mil) ($Mil) ($Mil)
Revenue 22,000 5,200 800 (Synergy) 28,000
Expense Excluding
20,000 5,100 100 (Synergy) 25,000
D&A
EBITDA 2,000 100 900 (Total synergy) 3,000
Depr & Amort 600 200 200 (FV amort) 1,000
Interest Expense 240 0 60 (New interest) 300
Income Tax Expense / / / 340
Net Income / / / 1,360
66
67
Practice 1
Golden Co. plans to outsource its manufacturing and call centers
of personal computers to Ali Ltd., to reduce headcounts and time
devoted by the management. The plan is best characterized as:
A. cost structuring
B. balance sheet structuring
C. reorganization
Answer: A
68
69
Practice 2
Answer: A
可比交易法使用的是类似的被收购方历史并购数据,不是类
似公司的目前股票交易价格。该选项表述前后颠倒了。A选项
表述错误,符合题意,为正确选项。
对于选项B,收购溢价不需要单独估计,已经含在收购价中了。
该选项表述正确,不符合题意,为错误选项。
对于选项C,如果可比交易不多或不存在,分析师可以尝试使
用近似或相关行业的交易数据。该选项表述正确,不符合题
意,为错误选项。
70
您 高分喷雾 Zion