Tanwir Al-Halak v1.3 (FINAL)

Sold to Saif Khan (#MRIID1IW)
sh eddi n g light on the p os sibil it y

of seeing prophets and ang el s
Shedding Light on the Possibility

of Seeing Prophets and Angels
Tanwīr al-Ḥalak fī Imkān Ru’yah al-Nabī wa

al-Malak
by Imam Jalāl al-Dīn al-Suyū‎ṭī
Translated by
Talut ibn Sulaiman Dawood
© 2020 Imam Ghazali Publishing, USA

Permission granted for personal, non-commercial use.
This file was made public in June 2020. The most updated version can be
found on www.igibooks.com.
Title: Shedding Light on the Possibility of Seeing Prophets and Angels
ISBN: 978-1-952306-02-0
First Edition – June 2020
Author: Imam Jalāl al-Dīn al-Suyūṭī

Translator: Talut ibn Sulaiman Dawood
Typesetter: Imran Rahim ◆ enquiries@ethereadesign.com
Proofreader & Editor: ◆ wordsmiths.org.uk ◆ info@wordsmiths.org.uk
The views, information, or opinions expressed are solely those of the author(s)
and do not necessarily represent those of Imam Ghazali Publishing or Imam
Ghazali Institute.
Please consider supporting us via Patreon membership. Your patronage helps

provide access to sound knowledge of Islam in many languages and locations
around the world.
www.patreon.com/imamghazali
Contents
Biography of al-Suyūṭī
i

1
Conclusion
23
About the Imam Ghazali Institute

31
Biography of al-Suyūṭī
(b. 849 h. – d. 911 in Cairo)
by dr. g. f. haddad
¢Abd al-Raḥmān ibn Kamāl al-Dīn Abī Bakr ibn Muḥammad ibn Sābiq
al-Dīn Jalāl al-Dīn al-Misrī al-Suyūṭī al-Shāfi¢ī al-Ash¢arī (849-911),
also known as Ibn al-Suyūṭī, was a mujtahid imam and reformer of
the tenth Islamic century. He was a prominent Hadith Master, jurist,
Sufi, philologist and historian, who authored works in virtually every
Islamic science.
Born to a Turkish mother and a father of Persian origin, he was
raised as an orphan in Cairo. He memorized the Qur’an at the age of
eight, followed by several complete works of Sacred Law, fundamen-
tals of jurisprudence, and Arabic grammar. He then devoted his life to
studying the Sacred Sciences under approximately 150 sheikhs. Among
them were the foremost Shāfi¢ī and Ḥanafī sheikhs at the time, such as
Sheikh al-Islām Sirāj al-Dīn al-Bulqīnī, with whom he studied Shāfi¢ī
jurisprudence; the Hadith scholar Sheikh al-Islām Sharāf al-Dīn al-
Munāwī, with whom he read Qur’anic exegesis and who commented on
al-Suyūṭī’s Al-jāmi¢ al-ṣaghīr in a book entitled Fayḍ al-Qadīr; and Taqī
al-Dīn al-Shamani, with whom he studied Hadith and the sciences of
Arabic. Al-Suyūṭī also studied with Jalāl al-Dīn al-Maḥallī, a specialist
in the principles of the law, together with whom he compiled the most
widespread, condensed commentary on the Qur’an of our time: Tafsīr
al-Jalālayn. Some Ḥanafī sheikhs he studied under include Shihāb al-
Dīn al-Sharmisahi, Muḥyī al-Dīn al-Kafayjī, and the Hadith Master
Sayf al-Dīn Qāsim ibn Qaṭlūbaghā.
i
In the pursuit of knowledge, al-Suyūṭī travelled to Damascus, the

Hejaz, Yemen, India and Morocco, as well as to centers of learning in
Egypt such as Maḥalla, Dumyāṭ, and Fayyūm. He spent some time as
the head teacher of Hadith at the Shaykhuniyya school in Cairo, at the
recommendation of Imam Kamāl al-Dīn ibn al-Humām. He then took
up the same position at Baybarsiyya, but was dismissed due to complaints
from other sheikhs whom he had replaced. After this, he retired into
scholarly seclusion and did not return to the field of teaching.
Ibn Iyās, in Tārīkh Miṣr, reveals that when al-Suyūṭī reached forty
years of age, he abandoned the company of men for the solitude of the
garden of al-Miqyās, by the side of the river Nile, where he avoided his
former colleagues as though he had never known them. It was there that
he authored the majority of his nearly 600 books and treatises. Wealthy
Muslims and princes would visit him with offers of money and gifts
but he rejected them and also refused the Sultan many times when he
requested al-Suyūṭī s presence. He once said to the Sultan’s envoy: ‘Do
not ever come back to us with a gift, for in truth Allah has put an end
to all such needs for us.’
He was blessed with great success in his years of solitude making it
difficult to name a field in which al-Suyūṭī did not make outstanding
contributions. Among his most prominent works is his ten-volume
Hadith collection Jam¢ al-Jawāmi¢ (‘The Collection of Collections’); his
Qur’anic exegesis Tafsīr al-Jalālayn (‘Commentary of the Two Jalāls’)
in which he finished the second half of an uncompleted manuscript
by Jalāl al-Dīn Maḥallī in just forty days; and his classic commentary
on the sciences of Hadith Tadrīb al-Rāwī fi Sharḥ Taqrīb al-Nawawī
(‘The Training of the Hadith Transmitter: An Exegesis of Nawawī’s
“The Facilitation”’).
A giant among contemporary scholars, he produced a sustained
output of scholarly writings until his death at the age of sixty two. He
was buried in Hawsh Qawsūn in Cairo. In the introduction to his book
entitled al-Riyāḍ al-Anīqa on the names of the Prophet s he said: ‘It is
my hope that Allah accepts this book and that through this book I shall
gain the intercession of the Prophet s. Perhaps it shall be that Allah
makes it the seal of all my works, and grants me what I have asked Him
with longing, regarding the Honorable One.’
The editors of Ḍalīl Makhṭūṭāt al-Suyūṭī (‘Guide to al-Suyūṭī’s Man-
uscripts’) have listed 723 works to his name.1 Some of these are brief
fatwas which do not exceed four pages, such as his notes on the hadith
ii
‘Whoever says: “I am knowledgeable” he is ignorant’ entitled A¢dhab

al-Manāhil fī Hadith Man Qāla Ana ¢Ālim. Other works of his, for in-
stance Itqān fī ¢Ulūm al-Qur’ān and Tadrīb al-Rāwī, are complete tomes.
Al-Ṭabarānī stated that the above hadith is only narrated through the
chain containing al-Layth ibn Abī Sulaym, which is a weak chain. Al-¢A-
jlūnī in Kashf al-Khafā’ says that this hadith is narrated by al-Ṭabarānī
in al-Awsaṭ from Ibn ¢Umar, rather than the Prophet s. Al-Haytamī
states in al-Fatāwa al-Hadithīyya that this is simply a saying of the
tābi’ī Yaḥyā ibn Kathīr. For his part, Ibn Kathīr cites it from ¢Umar in
his tafsīr of the verse: ‘Have you not seen those who praise themselves
for purity?’ (al-Nisā’ 4: 49).Three narrations regarding this hadith are
mentioned from ¢Umar in Kanz al-¢Ummāl, but all of them are weak.
Al-¢Irāqī in his al-Mughnī explains that the part actually attributed to
Yaḥyā ibn Kathīr is: ‘Whoever says: “I am a believer”, he is a disbeliever’
while al-Haythamī in Majma¢ al-Zawā’id cites from Ibn Kathīr, with
a weak chain, as follows: ‘Whoever says: “I am knowledgeable”, he is
ignorant, and whoever says: “I am ignorant”, he is ignorant. Whoever
says: “I am in Paradise”, he is in the Fire, and whoever says: “I am in
the Fire”, he is in the Fire.’ Al-Haythamī further added: ‘It is established
from countless Companions and others that they said they were knowl-
edgeable, and they would not do anything which the Prophet s had
criticized. A greater proof is Yusuf ’s statement: “I am a knowledgeable
guardian”’ (Yūsuf 12: 55).
However, the narration of al-Layth is confirmed by the hadith of
the Prophet s:
Islam shall be on the rise until traders take to the sea [carrying
it], and horses charge in the cause of Allah. After that, a people
will come and recite the Qur’an, saying: ‘Who recites it better
than us? Who is more knowledgeable than us? Who is wiser
than us?’ Then he turned to his Companions and asked: ‘Is
there any good in such as these?’ They said: ‘Allah and His
Prophet know best.’ He said: ‘Those are from among you, O
ummah! Those are fodder for the Fire.’2
A reconciling factor is that the hadith of Ibn Abī Sulaym applies to

those who claim knowledge either undeservedly or proudly, and not
to those who act out of sincerity and obligation. Ibn ¢Aṭā’ Allāh said
in his Ḥikam:
iii
The root of every disobedience, forgetfulness, and desire is

contentment with the self, while the root of every obedience,
vigilance, and continence is your dissatisfaction with it. That
you accompany an ignorant who is not pleased with himself
is better for you than to accompany a knowledgeable person
who is pleased with himself. And what ignorance is that of one
who is dissatisfied with himself? And what knowledge is that
of one who is satisfied with himself?
Imam al-Sha¢rānī in al-¢Uhud al-Muḥammadīyya (‘The Pledges We

Made to the Prophet s’) made a similar statement:
The Prophet stook our pledge that we should not claim to

possess knowledge except for a licit cause, and that we should
never say: ‘We are the most knowledgeable of people’ neither
with our mouths nor with our hearts. How could we say such a
thing when we know full well that in our country, let alone our
region, there is one who is more knowledgeable than we? But if
it is one day ordained for us to claim knowledge, then we must
immediately follow this with repentance and ask forgiveness,
lest punishment descend on us. This is a problem which no
wise person ever faces, for there is no science which one has
looked up, except the scholars of knowledge anticipated him
and wrote books about it, scholars whose pupil he may not
even deserve to be.
Al-Suyūṭī’s student and biographer Shams al-Dīn al-Dāwūdī al-Mā-

likī, the author of Ṭabaqāt al-Mufassirīn al-Kubrā, said: ‘I saw the sheikh
with my own eyes writing and finishing three works in one day which
he himself authored and proofread. At the same time, he was dictating
hadith and replying beautifully to whatever was brought to his attention.’
Al-Sakhāwī reproached him for his plagiarism of earlier books, and
others added that the profusion of his works were the reason they were
often incomplete, and for the frequency of flaws and contradictions in
them. This is a charge commonly laid at the door of prolific authors,
such as Ibn al-Jawzī and Ibn Taymīyyah. Also note that there was some
animosity between al-Suyūṭī and his sheikh, al-Sakhāwī, as exhibited
in the former’s tract al-Kāwī fī al-Radd ¢alā al-Sakhāwī (‘The Searing
Brand in Refuting al-Sakhāwī’) and his unflattering mention in the
poem Nazm al-‘Iqyān fī A¢yān al-A¢yān.
iv
His chain of transmission in taṣawwuf goes back to Sheikh ¢Abd

al-Qādir al-Jilānī. Al-Suyūṭī belonged to the Shādhili ṭarīqa, which he
eulogized in his brief defence of taṣawwuf entitled Tashyīd al-Haqīqa
al-¢Aliyya. In the book, he states: ‘I have looked at the matters which
the Imams of Shariah have criticized in Sufis, and I did not see a single
true Sufi holding such positions. Rather, they are held by the people of
innovation and the extremists who have claimed for themselves the title
of Sufi while in reality they are not.’ In the Tashyīd he also produces
narrative chains of transmission proving that al-Ḥasan al-Baṣrī did in
fact narrate directly from ¢Alī ibn Abī Ṭālib (raḍiyallāhu ¢anhu). This
goes against the commonly received opinion among the scholars of
hadith3 although it was also the opinion of Imam Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal.4
When one of his sheikhs, Burhān al-Dīn Ibrāhīm ibn ¢Umar al-Biqā¢ī
(d. 885), attacked Ibn ¢Arabī in a tract entitled Tanbīh al-Ghabī ilā Tak-
fīr Ibn ¢Arabī (‘Warning to the Dolt That Ibn ¢Arabī is an Apostate’),
al-Suyūṭī countered with a tract entitled Tanbīh Al-Ghabī fī Takhṭi’a
Ibn ¢Arabī (‘Warning to the Dolt That Faults Ibn ¢Arabī’). Both epistles
have been published.5 In his reply, al-Suyūṭī states that he considers Ibn
¢Arabī a Friend of Allah whose writings are forbidden to those who
read them without first learning the technical terms used by the Sufis.
He cites from Ibn Ḥajar’s list in Anbā’ al-Ghumr, the trusted scholars
who kept a good opinion of Ibn ¢Arabī or counted him a walī: Ibn ¢Aṭā’
Allāh al-Iskandarī (d. 709), al-Yāfi¢ī (d. 678), Ibn ¢Abd al-Salām after the
latter’s meeting with al-Shādhilī, Shihāb al-Dīn Abū al-¢Abbās Aḥmad
ibn Yaḥyā al-Malwī al-Tilimsānī (d. 776), Sirāj al-Dīn Abū Ḥafṣ ¢Umar
ibn Isḥāq al-Hindī al-Ḥanafī (d. 773) the author of Sharḥ al-Hidāya and
Sharḥ al-¢Aynī, Najm al-Dīn al-Bahi al-Ḥanbalī (d. 802), al-Jabartī (d.
806), the major lexicographer al-Fayrūzābādī (d. 818), Shams al-Dīn
al-Bisāṭī al-Māliki (d. 842), al-Munāwī (d. 871), and others. Of note
regarding the above is the abundant use of Ibn ¢Arabī’s sayings by al-
Munāwī in his commentary of al-Suyūṭī’s Jāmi¢ al-Ṣaghīr entitled Fayḍ
al-Qadīr, and by Fayrūzābādī in his commentary on Bukhārī’s al-Ṣaḥiḥ.
Al-Suyūṭī was Ash¢arī in his doctrine as shown in many of his works.
In Masālik al-Ḥunafā fī Wālidayy al-Muṣṭafā (’Methods Of Those With
Pure Belief Concerning the Parents of The Prophet s’) he says:
The parents of the Prophet s died before he attained Prophethood,
and there is no punishment for them. The Qur’an says ‘We never pun-
ish until We send a messenger [whom they reject]’ (al-Isrā’ 17: 15). Our
Ash¢arī Imams, among those in kalām, uṣūl, and fiqh, agree on the
v
statement that one who dies while da¢wah has not reached him, dies
saved. This has been explained by Imam al-Shāfi¢ī as follows: ‘some of
the fuqahā’ explained that the reason for the above is, such a person
follows fitra (primordial disposition), and has not stubbornly refused
nor rejected any Messenger.’6
Al-Suyūṭī was taken to task for his claim that he was capable of inde-
pendent scholarly exertion or ijtihād muṭlaq. He explained:
I did not mean that I was similar to one of the Four Imams,
but only that I was an affiliated mujtahid (mujtahid muntasib).
For, when I reached the level of tarjīh or distinguishing the
best fatwa inside the school, I did not contravene al-Nawawī’s
tarjīh. And, when I reached the level of ijtihad muṭlaq, I did
not contravene al-Shāfi¢ī’s school.
He continued:
There is no one in our time, on the face of the earth, from

East to West, more knowledgeable than me in Hadith and the
Arabic language, save al-Khidr or the Pole of saints or some
other walī - none of whom do I include into my statement -
and Allah knows best.7
He also said ‘When I went on hajj, I drank Zamzam water for several
matters. Among them was that I reach the level of Sheikh Sirāj al-Dīn
al-Bulqīnī in fiqh, and in hadith, that of hafiz Ibn Hajar.’8
Below are the titles of some of al-Suyūṭī’s works in print, kept in the
Arabic collection of the University of Princeton in the State of New
Jersey (usa). The most recent date has been given for works with more
than one edition:
1. Abwāb al Sa¢āda fī Asbāb al-Shahāda <1987> (‘The Gates of
Felicity in the Causes of the Witnessing to Oneness’)
2. Al-Ashbāh wa al-Naẓā’ir fī Furū¢ al-Shāfi¢iyya (‘Similarities
in the Branches of the Law Within the Shāfi¢ī School’)
3. Al-Ashbāh wa al-Naẓā’ir fī al-¢Arabiyya (‘Similarities in
Arabic’)
4. Al-Aḥādīth al-Ḥisān fī Faḍl al-Ṭaylasān <1983> (‘The Beauti-
vi
ful Narrations Concerning the Merit of the Male Head-cov-

ering’)
5. Al-Fawz al-¢Aẓīm fī Liqā’ al-Karīm <1994> (‘The Tremen-
dous Victory in Meeting the All-Generous’)
6. Alfiyya al-Suyūṭī al-Naḥwiyya <1900> (‘The Thousand-Line
Poem on Philology’)
7. Alfiyya al-Suyūṭī fī Muṣṭalah al-Ḥadīth <1988> (‘The Thou-
sand-Line Poem on Hadith Nomenclature’)
8. ¢Amal al-Yawm wa al-Layla <1987> (‘Supererogatory Devo-
tions for Each Day and Night’)
9. Al-Itqān fī ¢Ulūm al-Qur’ān <1996> (‘Precision and Mastery
in the Sciences of the Qur’an’)
10. Anīs al-Jalīs <1874> (‘The Familiar Companion’)
11. Al-’Araj fī al-Faraj <1988> (‘A Commentary on Ibn Abī al-
Dunyā’s “The Deliverance”’, a work on hope and joy)
12. Al-Arba¢ūn Ḥadīth fī Qawā¢id al-Aḥkām al-Shar¢iyya
<1986> (‘Forty Narrations on Basic Legal Rulings’)
13. Asbāb al-Nuzūl <1983> (‘Causes of Qur’anic Revelation’, verse
by verse)
14. Asbāb Wurūd al-Ḥadīth <1988> (‘Causes and Circumstances
of Hadith’)
15. Isbāl al-Kisā’ ¢alā al-Nisā’ <1984> (‘Women and the Donning
of Cover’)
16. Asrār Tartīb al-Qur’ān <1976> (‘The Secret in the Ordering
of the Qur›an’)
17. Al-Āyat al-Kubra fī Sharḥ Qiṣṣat al-Isrā’ <1985> (‘The Great
Sign: Commentary on the Story of the Night Journey of the
Prophet s’)
18. ¢Ayn al-Iṣāba fī Istidrāk ¢Ā’ishah ¢alā al-Ṣaḥāba <1988> (‘Ex-
actitude Itself in ¢Ā’isha’s Rectification of the Companions’)
vii
19. Azhār al-Mutanāthira fī al-Aḥādīth al-Mutawātira <1951>

(‘The Most Prominent of the Reports Concerning the Narra-
tions of Mass Transmission’)
20. Al-Bāhir fī Ḥukm al-Nabī s <1987> (‘The Dazzling Light of
the Rulings of the Prophet s’)
21. Al-bahja al-marḍiyya fī sharḥ al-alfiyya <1980> (‘The pleas-
ing beauty: a commentary on Muḥammad Ibn ¢Abdullāh
Ibn Mālik›s (d. 1274 CE) “Alfiyya”’, a thousand-line poem on
grammar)
22. Bulbul al-rawḍa <1981> (‘Chronicle on al-Rawda, Egypt’)
23. Bushrā al-Ka’īb bi liqā’ al-Ḥabīb <1960> (‘The consolation of
the sad with the meeting of the Beloved’)
24. Al-Dībāj ¢alā Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj <1991> (‘Two-vol-
ume commentary on Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim’)
25. Al-Durar al-Muntathira fī al-aḥādīth al-mushtahara <1988>
(‘The scattered pearls of famous narrations’); also published
as al-nawafiḥ al-¢atira fī al-aḥādīth al-mushtahara <1992>
(‘The fragrant scents of famous narrations’)
26. Al-durr al-Manthūr fī al-Tafsīr bi al-Ma’thūr (‘The scat-
tered pearls: A commentary of Qur’an based on transmitted
reports’)
27. Al-Duruj al-Munifa fī al-Abā’ al-Sharīfa <1916> (‘The out-
standing entries concerning the ancestors of the Prophet s ’)
28. Faḍḍ al-wi¢ā’ fī aḥādīth raf¢ al-yadayn fī al-du¢ā’ <1985>
(‘The emptying of the vessel concerning raising the hands
when making supplication’)
29. Al-ghurar fī faḍā’il ¢Umar <1991> (‘The blazing highlights of
Umar’s merits’)
30. Al-Ḥabā’ik fī akhbār al-malā’ik <1985> (‘The celestial orbits
or the reports concerning the angels’)
31. Ḥaqīqa al-sunna wa al-bid¢a aw al-’amr bi al-ittibā¢ wa
viii
al-nahī ¢an al-munkar <1985> (‘The reality of Sunna and

innovation or the ordering of obedient following and the
prohibition of evil’)
32. Al-Ḥāwī lil-fatāwī fī al-fiqh wa-¢ulūm al-tafsīr wa al-ḥadīth
wa al-uṣūl wa-al-naḥw wa al-i¢rāb wa-sā’ir al-funūn <1933>
(‘The collected legal decisions in jurisprudence, Qur’anic
commentary, hadith, principles, language, and other scienc-
es’)
33. Al-ḥujaj al-mubayyana fi al-tafḍīl bayna makka wa al-madī-
na <1985> (‘The proofs made manifest concerning the super
excellence of Makkah and Madinah’)
34. Ḥusn al-maqṣid fī ¢amal al-mawlid <1985> (‘Excellence of
purpose in celebrating the birth of the Prophet s’)
35. Ḥusn al-samt fī al-ṣamt <1985> (‘The merits of silence’)
36. Iḥyā’ al-mayyit bi faḍāil ahl al-bayt <1988> (‘Giving life to
the dead with the merits of the Family of the Prophet s’)
37. Ikhtilāf al-madhāhib <1989> (‘The divergences among the
schools of law’)
38. Al-iklīl fī istinbāṭ al-tanzīl <1981> (‘The diadem: the ex-
traction of rulings from the revealed Book’)
39. Inbāh al-adhkiyā’ fī ḥayāt al-anbiyā’ <1916> (‘Notice to the
wise concerning the lives of the Prophets [i.e. In the grave]’)
40. Al-iqtirāḥ fī ¢ilm uṣūl al-naḥw <1978> (‘The authoritative
discourse concerning the science of philology’)
41. Al-izdihār fī mā ¢aqadahu al-shu¢arā min al-aḥādīth wa al-
āthār <1991> (‘The flourishes of poets related to the Prophet-
ic narrations and sayings of the Companions’)
42. Jam¢ al-jawāmi¢ al-ma¢rūf bi al-jāmi¢ al-kabīr <1970> (‘The
collection of collections, known as the Major Collection’)
43. Jami¢ al-aḥādith al-jami¢ al-ṣaghīr wa zawā’idi <1994> (‘The
Minor Collection and its addenda’)
ix
44. Jany al-jinās <1986> (‘The genera of rhetoric’)

45. Jazīl al-mawāhib fī ikhtilāf al-madhāhib <1992> (‘The abun-
dant gifts concerning the differences among the schools of
law’)
46. Al-kanz al-madfūn wa al-falak al-mashḥūn <1992> (‘The
buried treasure in the laden ship: An encyclopedia of Islamic
history’)
47. Kashf al-ṣalṣala ¢an waṣf al-zalzala <1987> (‘The transmitted
expositions concerning the description of the Earthquake of
Doomsday’)
48. Al-Radd ¢alā man akhlada ilā al-arḍi wa jahila anna al-ij-
tihāda fī kulli ¢aṣrin farḍ <1984> (‘Refutation of those who
cling to the earth and ignore that scholarly striving is a reli-
gious obligation in every age’)
49. Kitāb al-shamārīkh fī ¢ilm al-tārīkh <1894> (‘The book of
date-heavy stalks: a primer on historiography’)
50. Kitāb al-shihāb al-thāqib fi dhamm al-khalīl <1992> (‘The
piercing arrows, a commentary on ¢Alī ibn Zafir’s (d. 1226
CE) “The Healing of the Parched concerning the castigation
of one’s dear friend”’, a book on the ethics of friendship)
51. Kitāb al-tabarri min ma¢arra al-ma¢arrī wa tuḥfa al- ẓurafā’
bi asmā’ al-khulafā’ <1989> (‘Poetry on the names of the
Caliphs’)
52. Kitab al-tadhkīr bi al-marji¢ wa al-maṣīr <1991> (‘Book of
the reminder of the Return to Allah’)
53. Kitāb asmā’ al-mudallisīn <1992> (‘The book of narrators
who omit certain details while narrating’)
54. Kitāb bughya al-wu¢ā fī ṭabaqāt al-lughawiyyīn <1908> (‘The
must of the sagacious concerning the biographical layers of
lexicologists and philologists’)
55. Kitāb ham¢ al-hawāmi¢ sharḥ jam¢ al-jawāmi¢ fī ¢ilm al-
naḥw <1973> (‘The rushing floodgates, or commentary on
x
the Collection of collections on the science of philology’)

56. Kitāb ḥusn al-muḥāḍara fī akhbār miṣr wa al-qāhira <1904>
(‘The excellent lectures concerning the chronicle of Egypt
and Cairo’)
57. Kitab itmām al-dirāya li qurrā’ al-nuqāya <1891> (‘The per-
fection of knowledge for the elite among readers’)
58. Kitab lubb al-lubāb fī taḥrīr al-ansāb <1840> (‘The kernel of
kernels concerning the editorship of genealogies’)
59. Tazyīn al-mamālik bi manāqib Imām Mālik <1907> (‘The
adornment of slaves with the virtues of Imam Malik’)
60. Kitāb tuḥfat al-mujalis wa nuzha al-majālis <1908> (‘The
jewel of every fellow student and the pleasant gatherings’)
61. Laqaṭ al-marjān fī aḥkām al-jān <1989> (‘The gleanings of
coral: rulings concerning the jinn’)
62. Lubāb al-nuqūl fī asbāb al-nuzūl <1981> (‘The best of narra-
tions concerning the circumstances of revelation’)
63. Al-luma¢ fī khaṣā’is yawm al-jumu¢ah <1986> (‘The merits of
The day of jumu¢ah’)
64. Mā rawāhu al-asāṭīn fī ¢adam al-majī’ ilā al-salāṭīn <1992>
(‘The reports concerning not appearing at the courts of
rulers’); together with Dhamm al-maks (‘The blame of taxes
and tolls’)
65. Manāhil al-ṣafā fī takhrīj aḥadith al-shifā <1988> (‘The
Springs of Purity: Documentation of the hadiths mentioned
in Qāḍī ¢Iyād’s “The Healing”’)
66. Manāqib al-khulafā’ al-rāshidīn <1890> (‘Virtues of the
well-guided Caliphs’)
67. Al-Manhaj al-sawī wa al-manhal al-rawī fī al-ṭibb al-nabawī
<1986> (‘The straight path and quenching spring: the medi-
cine of the Prophet s)
68. Al-maqāmat al-sundusiyya fī al-nisba al-muṣṭafawīyya
xi
<1916> (‘The resplendent stations concerning Prophetic

ancestry’)
69. Al-maṣābīḥ fī ṣalat al-tarāwīḥ <1955> (‘The lanterns of the
“prayer of rests” [tarāwīḥ]’)
70. Masālik al-hunafā’ fī waliday al-Muṣṭafā <1993> (‘Method of
those of pure religion concerning the parents of the Proph-
et s’)
71. Al-maṭāli¢ al-sa¢īda fī sharḥ al-Suyūṭī ¢alā al-alfiyya
al-musamma bī al-Farida fī al-naḥw wa al-taṣrīf wa al-khaṭṭ
<1981> (‘Suyūṭī’s commentary on his own thousand-line
poem entitled “The unique pearl” on philology, conjugation,
and calligraphy’)
72. Maṭla¢ al-badrayn fīman yu’ta ajrahu marratayn <1991>
(‘The rising of the two full moons: those who are rewarded
twice [i.e. Sincere Christians who accept Islam]’)
73. Miftaḥ al-jannah fī al-i¢tiṣām bi al-Sunnah <1993> (‘The key
to paradise which consists in clinging to the Sunnah of the
Prophet s’)
74. Mufḥimāt al-aqrān fī mubhamāt al-Qur’ān <1991> (‘The
elucidations of the peers for the obscurities of the Qur’an’)
75. Al-muhadhdhab fīmā waqa¢ fī al-Qur’ān min al-mu¢arrab
<1988> (‘The emendation concerning the foreign words and
phrases in the Qur’an’)
76. Mu¢jiza ma¢a karama fī kitāb al-Sharaf al-muḥattam: fī
mā manna Allah ta¢āla bihi ¢alā waliyyihi Aḥmad al-Rifā¢ī
<1965> (‘The miracle and gift concerning the book of “The
paramount honour” [by al-Rifā¢ī] and what Allah has be-
stowed in it upon His Friend Aḥmad [ibn ¢Alī] al-Rifa¢i [d.
1182 CE]’)
77. Mukhtasar sharḥ al-jami¢ al-ṣaghīr li al-Munāwī <1954>
(‘The abridged commentary of the minor collection by al-
Munāwī’)
78. Muntahā al-’āmāl fī sharḥ ḥadīth innama al-a¢māl <1986>
xii
(‘The goal of all practice, or the commentary on the hadith:

Actions are according to intentions’)
79. Musnad Fātima al-zahrā’ radiya allah anha wa ma warada
fi faḍliha<1994> (‘The narrations traced back to Fatima the
Radiant and the reports concerning her virtues’)
80. Mustaẓraf min akhbār al-jawārī <1989> (‘The graceful re-
ports concerning women slaves’)
81. Mutawakkilī fīmā warada fī al-Qur’an bi al-lugha
al-Ḥabashiyya wa al-Fārisīyya wa al-Rūmīyya wa al-
Hindīyya wa al-Siryānīyya wa al-¢Ibrānīyya wa al-Nabaṭiyya
wa al-Qibṭiyya wa al-Turkīyya wa al-Zanjīyya wa al-Bar-
barīyya (‘My reliance concerning what has been mentioned
in the Qur’an in Ethiopian, Farsi, Greek, Hindi, Syriac, He-
brew, Nabatean, Coptic, Turkic, African, and Berber’)
82. Nashr al-¢alamayn al-munīfayn fī iḥyā’ al-abawayn al-sharī-
fayn <1916> (‘The proclamation to the two outstanding
worlds [mankind and jinn] concerning the resuscitation of
the parents of the Prophet s’)
83. Natīja al-fikr fī al-jahr bi al-dhikr <1950> (‘The conclusion of
reflection upon loud remembrance of Allah’)
84. Naẓm al-¢iqyān fī a¢yān al-a¢yān <1927> (‘Who’s who in the
ninth Hijri century’)
85. al-Nukat al-badī¢āt ¢alā al-mawḍū¢āt <1991> (al-Suyūṭī’s
critique of Ibn al-Jawzi’s collection of forged narrations)
86. Nuzha al-julasā’ fī ash’ār al-nisā’ <1986> (‘The recreation of
student gatherings concerning famous women poets’)
87. Nuzha al-muta’ammil wa-murshid al-muta’ahhil: fī al-
khāṭib wa-al-mutazawwij <1989> (‘The recreation of the
fiancé and the guide of the married’)
88. Nuzha al-¢umr fi al-tafḍīl bayna al-bayḍ wa al-sumr <1931>
(‘The recreation of life about establishing preference between
the white and the black in complexion’)
xiii
89. Nuzul ¢Īsā ibn Maryam Ākhir al-Zamān <1985> (‘The de-
scent of ¢Īsā ibn Maryam at the end of time’)
90. Al-qawl al-jalī fī faḍā’il ¢Alī <1990> (‘The manifest discourse
on the virtues of ¢Alī ibn Abī Talib raḍiyallāhu ¢anhu’)
91. Al-raḥma fī al-ṭibb wa al-ḥikma <1970> (‘Arabic medicine
and wisdom’)
92. Al-rasā’il al-¢ashr <1989> (‘The ten epistles’)
93. Raṣf al-la’āl fī wasf al-hilāl <1890> (‘The stringing of the
pearls in describing the new moon’)
94. Al-rawḍ al-anīq fī faḍl al-ṣiddīq <1990> (‘The beautiful gar-
den of the merit of Abu Bakr al-Ṣiddīq raḍiyallāhu ¢anhu’)
95. Risāla al-sayf al-qāṭi¢ al-lāmi¢ li ahl al-i¢tirad al-shawa’i¢
<1935> (‘Epistle of the sharp and glistening sword to the Shī¢ī
people of opposition’)
96. Al-riyāḍ al-anīqa fī sharḥ asmā’ khayr al-khalīqa ṣallallāhu
¢alayhi wa sallam (‘The beautiful gardens: explanation of the
names of the Best of Creation [the Prophet Muhammad s]’)
97. Ṣawn al-manṭiq wa al-kalām ¢an fann al-manṭiq wa al-
kalām <1947> (‘Manual of logic and dialectic theology’)
98. Shaqā’iq al-utruj fi raqā’iq al-ghunj <1988> (‘The citron
halves: or, the delicacy of women’)
99. Sharḥ al-sudūr bi sharḥ ḥāl al-mawtā wa al-qubūr <1989>
(‘The expanding of breasts or commentary on the state of the
dead in the grave’)
100. Sharḥ al-urjūza al-musammā bi ¢uqūd al-jumān fī ¢alam
al-ma¢āni wa al-bayān <1955> (‘The commentary in rajāz
[surging] meter entitled: The pearl necklaces related to the
world of meanings and precious discourse’)
101. Sharḥ shawāhid al-mughnī <1904> (‘Commentary on the
proof-texts of ¢Abdullah ibn Hishām’s (d. 1360CE) Mughnī
al-labīb or “The sufficient knowledge of the sensible one”’)
xiv
102. Shurūṭ al-mufassir wa ādābuh <1994> (‘The criteria to be met

by commentators of Qur’an and their ethics’)
103. Sihām al-iṣāba fī al-da¢awāt al-mujāba <1987> (‘The arrows
that hit their target: About the prayers that are fulfilled’)
104. Subul al-jaliyya fī al-ābā’ al-¢aliyya <1916> (‘The manifest
paths concerning the lofty ancestors [of the Prophet s]’)
105. Ta¢aqqubāt al-Suyūṭī ¢alā mawḍū¢āt Ibn al-Jawzī <1886>
(‘Suyūṭī’s critique of Ibn al-Jawzī’s collection of forged narra-
tions’)
106. Ṭabaqāt al-mufassirīn <1976> (‘The biographical layers of
Qur’an commentators’)
107. Tabyīḍ al-ṣaḥīfa bi manaqib al-imām Abī Ḥanīfa <1992> (‘The
whitening of the page: or, the virtues of Imam Abū Ḥanīfa’)
108. Al-tadhyīl wa al-tadhnīb ¢alā al-Nihāya fī gharīb al-ḥadīth wa
al-athar <1982> (‘Marginal annotations on Ibn al-Athīr’s “The
goal”’)
109. Tadrīb al-rāwī fī sharḥ taqrīb al-nawawī <1994> (‘The training
of the hadith transmitter: an exegesis of Nawawī’s “The facili-
tation”’)
110. Tahdhīb al-khaṣā’iṣ al-nabawiyya al-kubra <1989> (‘The
emendation of al-Suyūṭī’s book entitled “The Awesome Char-
acteristics of the Prophet s’’)
111. Taḥdhīr al-khawāṣ min akādhīb al-quṣṣāṣ <1932> (‘Warning
the elite against the lies of story-tellers’)
112. Takhrīj aḥādiīth sharḥ al-mawāqif fī ¢ilm al-kalām <1986>
(‘The documentation of the hadiths mentioned in “The
commentary of the stopping-places in dialectical theology”’, a
work by Qāḍī ¢Aḍud al-Dīn ¢Abd al-Raḥmān ibn Aḥmad Ayjī
al-Shirāzī (d. 756)
113. Tamhīd al-farsh fī al-khiṣāl al-mūjiba li-ẓilal al-¢arsh <1990>
(‘The characteristics that guarantee the shading of the Throne’)
xv
114. Tanbīh al-ghabī fī takhti’a ibn ¢Arabī <1990> (‘Warning to

the ignorant who imputes error to Muḥyi al-Dīn Ibn ¢Arabī’
[a reply to al-Biqā¢ī’s ‘Warning of the ignorant that Ibn ¢Arabī
is a disbeliever]’)
115. Tanwīr al-ḥawālik sharḥ ¢ala muwaṭṭa’ Mālik <1969> (‘The
enlightenment of intense blackness: a commentary on Mālik’s
“Trodden path”’); together with Is¢āf al-mubaṭṭa’ fī rijāl
al-muwaṭṭa’ (‘The succor of the stalled concerning the narra-
tors of Mālik’s “Trodden Path”’)
116. Tanwīr al-miqbas min tafsīr ibn ¢Abbās <1951> (‘The enlight-
enment of torchlights from the Qur’anic commentary of Ibn
¢Abbās’)
117. Tanzīh al-anbiyā’ ¢an tashbīh al-aghbiyā’ <1916> (‘Declaring
the Prophets far above the comparisons ignorant people make
of themselves with them’)
118. Taqrīr al-istinād fī tafsīr al-ijtihād <1983> (‘Establishing au-
thoritative ascription in the course of scholarly striving’)
119. Al-ta¢rīf bi ādāb al-ta’līf <1989> (‘The etiquette of author-
ship’)
120. Tārīkh al-khulafā’ <1993> (‘History of the Caliphs’)
121. Tartīb suwar al-qur’ān <1986> (‘The disposition of the surahs
of the Qur’an’)
122. Tasliya al-ābā’ bi-fuqdān al-abnā’ al-musamma al-ta¢allul
wa al-iṭfā’ li-nār la tuṭfā’ <1987> (‘The consolation of parents
who have lost their children’ also known as ‘The extinction of
the fire that cannot be extinguished’)
123. Ṭawq al-ḥamāma <1988> (‘The flight of the dove’)
124. Ta’yīd al-ḥaqīqa al-¢aliyya wa tashyīd al-ṭarīqa al-shādhiliyya
<1934> (‘The upholding of the lofty truth and the buttressing
of the Shādhilī sufi path’)
125. Al-ta¢zīm wa al-minna fī anna abaway rasūlallāh fī al-jannah
<1916> (‘That the parents of the Prophet s are in Paradise’)
xvi
126. Tuḥfa al-abrār bi nukat al-adhkār li al-nawawī <1990>

(‘Commentary on Nawawī’s “Supplications”’)
127. Tuḥfa al-¢Ajlan fī Faḍā’il ¢Uthmān <1991> (‘The merits of
‘Uthmān ibn ¢Affān’)
128. Tuḥfa al-Nujabā’ <1990> (‘The gem of patricians [a work on
language]’)
129. ¢Uqūd al-Zabarjad ¢alā Musnad al-Imam Aḥmad <1987>
(‘The chrysolite necklaces on Imam Aḥmad’s collection of
narrations traced to the Prophet s’)
130. ¢Uqūd al-Zabarjad fī I¢r’ab al-Ḥadīth al-Nabawī <1994>
(‘The chrysolite necklaces on the grammatical analysis of the
narrations of the Prophet s’)
131. Al-Wasā’il fī Musāmara al-Awā’il <1986> (‘The means for
conversation with the ancients’); also published as al-Wasā’il
ilā Ma¢rifa al-Awā’il <1990> (‘The means to the acquain-
tance of the ancients’)
132. Wuṣūl al-Amānī bi Uṣūl al-Tahānī <1987> (‘The attainment
of one’s hope in the etiquette of well-wishing’)
133. Al-Zajr bi al-Hijr <1950> (‘The reprimand by means of the
reminder of what is unlawful’)
134. Zubda al-Laban Fawa’id Lughawiyya wa Ḥadīthīyya <1989>
(‘The cream of the milk: miscellaneous benefits related to
language and hadith’)
135. Akhlāq Ḥamalat al-Qur’ān <1987> (‘Manners of the carriers
of Qur’an’)
136. Badhl al-Himma fī Ṭalab Barā’a al-Dhimma (‘Directing
one’s energies to pursue clearness of conscience’); contained
in the collective volume entitled: Thalāth Rasā’il fī al-Ghība
<1988> (‘Three epistles on slander’)
137. Al-la’āli’ al-Maṣnū¢a fi al-Aḥādith al-Mawḍū¢a <1960> (‘The
artificial pearls or forged hadiths’)
xvii
138. Daqā’iq al-akhbār fī dhikr al-jannah wa al-nār <1961> (‘The

subtleties in the reports that mention Paradise and the Fire’)
139. Al-itḥāf bi ḥubb al-ashrāf <1900> (‘The present concerning
love of the nobility [i.e. Descendants of the Prophet s]’)
140. Hay’a al-sanīyya fī al-hay’a al-sunnīyya <1982> (‘Treatise on
astronomy’)
Main sources: Ibn Fahd, Dhayl Tadhkira al-Ḥuffāẓ p. 6-10; al-Suyūṭī,
Tārīkh al-Khulafā’, introduction p. 5-10; Nuh Keller, Reliance of the
Traveller p. 1100.
note s
[1] Muḥammad ibn Ibrāhīm al-Shaybānī and Aḥmad al-Khazindar, eds. Dalīl
Makhṭūṭāt al-Suyūṭī, 2nd ed. (Kuwait: Manshūrāt Markaz al-Makhṭūṭāt, 1995)
[2] Narrated from ¢Umar by al-Bazzār with a sound chain as stated by Haythamī
[3] See, for example, al-Sakhāwi’s words in his Maqāsid, in the entry khirqa
[4] Ibn Abī Ya¢la, Ṭabaqāt al-Ḥanābila (1:192): ‘My father (Qāḍī Abū Ya¢lā)
narrated to me in writing, “Īsā ibn Muḥammad ibn ¢Alī narrated to us: I heard
¢Abdullāh ibn Muḥammad (Imam Abū al-Qāsim al-Baghawī) say: I heard Abū
¢Abdullāh Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad ibn Hanbal say: ¢al-Ḥasan did narrate (qad
rawa) from ¢Alī ibn Abī Ṭālib.’”’ ¢Abd al-Razzaq in his Muṣannaf (7:412) nar-
rates that Ali even consulted al-Ḥasan in a certain judicial case. For the listing
of the chains of transmission establishing that al-Ḥasan narrated from Ali see
al-Suyūṭī’s Ta’yīd al-Ḥaqīqa al-¢Alīyya wa Tashyīd al-Ṭarīqa al-Shādhilīyya
and Aḥmad al-Ghumari’s al-Burhān al-Jalī fī Taḥqīq Intisāb al-Ṣūfiyya ila ¢Alī
[5] Al-Biqā¢ī, Maṣra¢ al-Taṣawwuf aw Tanbīh Al-Ghabī Ilā Takfīr Ibn ¢Arabī,
ed. ¢Abd al-Raḥmān al-Wakīl (Bilbis: Ḍār al-Taqwa, <1989>); al-Suyūṭī, Tanbīh
Al-Ghabī Fi Takhti’a Ibn ¢Arabī, ed. ¢Abd al-Raḥmān Ḥasan Maḥmūd (Cairo:
Maktaba al-Adab, 1990)
[6] It is related that some of the Ash¢arī imams such as al-Qurṭubī, al-Subkī,
and al-Sha¢rānī said that Abū Ṭālib, the Prophet’s uncle, was also saved, ac-
cording to Sheikh Aḥmad Zayni Daḥlān in his epistle Asnā al-Maṭālib fī Najāt
Abī Ṭālib (Cairo: Muḥammad Effendi Muṣṭafā, 1305/1886) who cites Imam
al-Suḥaymī and the Ḥanafī Mufti of Makkah Sheikh Aḥmad ibn ¢Abdullāh
Mīrghanī to that effect. They mention, among other evidence, the narration
of al-¢Abbās (raḍiyallāhu ¢anhu). Ibn Sa¢d said in his Ṭabaqāt al-Kūbra (1:118):
xviii
¢Affān ibn Muslim told us: Ḥammād ibn Salama told us: from Thābit [ibn
Aslam al-Bunānī]: from Iṣḥāq ibn ¢Abdullāh ibn al-Ḥārith [ibn Nawfal] who
said: al-¢Abbās said: ‘I said: “O Messenger of Allah, do you hope anything for
Abū Ṭālib?” He replied: “I hope everything good from my Lord.”’ The above
narrators are all trustworthy and their transmission is sound, except that the
meaning of the hadith is vague. Further, al-Qurṭubī, in his tafsīr (for verses 6:26
and 9:53) and Ibn al-Subkī in Ṭabaqāt al-Shāfi¢īyya al-Kūbra (1:91-94) hold
different positions than those ascribed to them above, and the sound evidence
to the contrary is explicit and abundant, but Allah knows best
[7] Al-Suyūṭī, al-Radd ¢alā man Akhlada ila al-Arḍ (p. 116)
[8] Al-Suyūṭī, Ḥusn al-Muḥāḍara fī Akhbar Miṣr wa al-Qāhira (p. 157)
xix

Tanwīr al-Ḥalak fī Imkān Ru’yah al-Nabī wa

al-Malak
by Imam Jalāl al-Dīn al-Suyū‎ṭī
Translated by
Talut ibn Sulaiman Dawood
In the Name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful

All praise is due to Allah. Peace be upon His chosen servants
To proceed:
We have received numerous inquiries regarding people in spiritual states
observing the waking vision of the Prophet s. Indeed, a party of the
people of this age, among those who have no foothold in knowledge,
vehemently denied the possibility of that. They are astonished by it and
claim that it is impossible. So, I have written this short work and named
it ‘Dispelling the Darkness Regarding the Possibility of Seeing Prophets
and Angels’ [Tanwīr al-Ḥalak fī Imkān Ru’yah al-Nabī wa al-Malak].”
We begin with the ṣaḥīḥ hadith narrated regarding it. Al-Bukhārī,
Muslim and Abū Dāwūd narrated that Abū Hurayrah (raḍiyallāhu
¢anhu) said, ‘The Messenger of Allah s said, “If someone sees me in a
dream, he will soon see me while awake. Satan cannot imitate my form.”’
Al-Ṭabarānī narrated something similar from the hadith of Mālik ibn
¢Abdullāh al-Khatha¢mī and the hadith of Abū Bakrah. And, al-Dārimī
narrated the same from the hadith of Abū Qatāda.
The scholars say that people disagreed over the meaning of his words,
‘He will soon see me while awake.’ Some said that its meaning is, ‘He
will see me on the Day of Judgement.’ However, they are rebuked by the
argument that there would be no benefit to such an allotment, because
all of his ummah will see him on the Day of Judgement, regardless of
whether or not they had seen him in a dream.
It has also been said that the meaning is that if someone believes in
him during his life, despite the fact that he has not seen him due to his
being hidden from him, it is a glad tiding that he would inevitably see
him while awake, before his death. However, another group said that it
is understood according to its apparent meaning. Thus, whoever sees
him in a dream, he will without doubt see him while awake, meaning
1
his physical eyes. It is also said that such a vision is with the eyes of the
heart. Both positions were reported from Qāḍī Abū Bakr ibn al-¢Arabī.
Imam Abū Muḥammad ibn Abī Jamrah said, in his comments on
the hadiths that he selected from al-Bukhārī:
This hadith indicates that if anyone sees him s in a dream,

he will see him while awake. However, does it indicate both
during his life and after he has passed away? Or, is it restricted
to those who lived during his lifetime? Also, is this [benefit]
for anyone who sees him without exception, or is it restricted
to those who are deserving by following His Sunnah s?
The wording indicates that it is a general and unrestricted
statement. And, those who claim that it is restricted, without
any indication of that restriction from him s, are transgress-
ing their limits. Some people had fallen into [the trap of] not
confirming its general meaning, saying, according to the con-
clusion of their intellect, ‘How could someone who has passed
away be seen in the physical world by those who are living?’
Such a statement is perilous from two important points of
view. The first is that it contains a refusal to confirm the words
of the Truthful One s, who does not speak from a place of de-
sires. The second is that it indicates ignorance of the power of
the Almighty and a belief that His power is deficient. It is as if
he has not heard the story of the cow in surah al-Baqarah, how
Allah (ta ¢ālā) said ‘We said: Strike him with a part of it. In such
a way, Allah will give life to the dead person’ (al-Baqarah 2: 73).
Or, the story of Ibrāhīm (¢alayhi al-salām) and the four birds,
or the story of ¢Uzayr. For, the One who made the striking of
the dead person with a piece of the cow a means to bringing
him back to life; the summoning of Ibrāhīm a means to giving
life to the birds; and the astonishment of Uzair a means to his
death, the death of his donkey and to reviving them both after
one hundred years, is certainly able to make seeing him s in
a dream a means to seeing him while awake.
It has been narrated about one of the Companions, who I
believe to be Ibn ¢Abbās (raḍiyallāhu ¢anhumā), that he saw the
Prophet s in a dream. It caused him to remember that hadith
and he kept thinking about it. Then, he entered upon one of
the wives of the Prophet s, who I believe was Maymūnah,
2
and he told her what had happened. So, she got up and took
out the mirror of the Prophet s. He (raḍiyallāhu ¢anhu) said,
‘I looked into the mirror and saw his image and I did not see
my own image.’
And there are many people among the Predecessors and the
following generations, and all those up to this time, who have
been mentioned as having seen him s. They were among those
who were truthful about such events and they saw him after
that while awake. They asked him about matters about which
they were confused and he informed them of the solution and
of the different ways to arrive at it (the solution). And, they
corroborated the solution in the manner described without
any addition.
The negater of this [vision] is either someone who con-
firms the karāmāt of the Saints or denies them. If he is among
those who denies them, there is no need to discuss the matter
with him, because he has denied a matter that the Sunnah has
confirmed with clear evidences. However, if he is among those
who confirms their karāmāt, this vision is from that category
because the Saints are unveiled, by way of preternatural events,
to various matters concerning the upper and lower realms and
this vision cannot be denied while confirming such unveiling.
His words explain that it is a general statement, not restricted to those

who are deserving of it or who follow his Sunnah s more closely. This
means that the vision while awake, which was promised for those who
saw him in a dream, will occur - even if only once - as a confirmation of
his noble promise which is never broken. For the general believers, the
least that will occur is that when his death draws near, he will see him
before his spirit departs from his body. He will see him as a fulfilment
of this promise. As for others, they will receive the vision throughout
their lifetime, either many times, or a few times, according to their ef-
forts and observation of the Sunnah. However, neglecting the Sunnah
is a great impediment to this benefit.
Muslim narrated in his al-Ṣaḥīḥ that Muṭarraf said, ‘¢Imrān ibn
Ḥuṣayn said to me, “I was being greeted with peace until I used cau-
terization. When I abandoned cauterization, my greetings returned.”’
Muslim narrated from another chain of narration that Muṭarraf said,
‘¢Imrān ibn Ḥuṣayn sent for me during his final illness. He said to me,
3
“I will tell you something. If I live, then conceal it. But if I die, relate it
if you wish. I used to receive greetings of peace.”’
Al-Nawawī said, in his explanation of Muslim:
The meaning of the first hadith is that ¢Imrān ibn Ḥuṣayn

suffered from haemorrhoids and he bore their pain patient-
ly. Thus, the Angels would greet him with peace. Then, he
cauterized them, and they ceased their greetings. Then, he
abandoned cauterization and the Angels returned to greeting
him with peace. His words in the second hadith, ‘If I live, then
conceal it for me,’ refer to not informing others that he was
being greeted with peace, because he hated that that should
be widely known about him in his lifetime, since that would
expose him to fitnah, as opposed to after his death.
Al-Qurṭubī said, in is explanation of Muslim, ‘[The hadith] means

that the Angels had been greeting him with peace, out of honour and
veneration for him, until he applied cauterization. They then stopped
greeting him. And in this hadith, there is a confirmation of the karāmāt
of the Saints.’
Al-Ḥākim related, declaring it sound in his Mustadrak, by way of
al-Muṭarraf ibn ¢Abdullāh that ¢Imrān ibn Ḥuṣayn said, ‘You should
know, O, Muṭarraf, that the Angels used to greet me with peace near
my head, near my house and at the door to my room. However, when I
applied cauterization, that [benefit] departed.’ And when he had freed
himself of that, I spoke to him and he said, ‘You should know, O, Muṭar-
raf, that what I mentioned to you has returned. But conceal it until my
death.’
Consider how ¢Imran was veiled from hearing the greetings of
the Angels due to his having used cauterization, despite the immense
necessity of doing so, because cauterization goes against the Sunnah.
Al-Bayhaqī stated in Shu¢ab al-Īmān:
If the interdiction of cauterization had been by way of prohi-

bition, ¢Imran would never have used it despite the fact that it
had been interdicted. However, since he performed a
disliked act, the Angels who had been greeting him with
peace parted company from him. At that he became
depressed, so he said what he said. But it has been narrated
that he returned to doing that before his death.
4
Ibn Athīr said, in al-Nihāyah:

It means that the Angels would greet him with peace. But, when
he applied cauterization because of his illness, they abandoned
greeting him. That is because cauterization is a deficiency in
one’s reliance and submission to Allah, in patient perseverance
with that with which He afflicts the slave, and in seeking one’s
cure from Him alone. That doesn’t mean that cauterization is
illicit. Rather, it is only a deficiency in one’s reliance, which is
a lofty degree beyond the use of intermediary means.
Ibn Sa¢d narrated in his Ṭabaqāt on the authority of Qatādah, that
the Angels used to shake ¢Imran ibn Ḥuṣayn’s hands until he applied
cauterization. [When he did that], they avoided him.
Abū Na¢īm narrated in Dalā’il al-Nubuwwah that Yaḥya ibn Sa¢īd
al-Qaṭṭān said, ‘No Companion came to us in Baṣrah, better than ¢Imrān
ibn Ḥuṣayn. The Angels came to him for over thirty years greeting him
with peace near to his house.’ Al-Tirmidhī narrated in his history, and
Abū Na¢īm and al-Bayhaqī both narrated in [their respective books]
Dalā’il al-Nubuwwah that Ghazālah said, ‘¢Imrān ibn Ḥuṣayn used to
order us to sweep his home. And we would hear, ‘Peace be upon you.
Peace be upon you.’ But we wouldn’t see anyone.’ Al-Tirmidhī said, ‘That
was the greeting of the Angels.’
Hujjat al-Islām Abū Ḥāmid al-Ghazālī said, in his book al-Munqidh
min al-Ḍalāl:
When I became unoccupied by studies, I turned my aspiration
towards the path of the Sufis. And what I wish to mention,
so that people may benefit from it, is that I understood with
certainty that the Sufis are the wayfarers on the paths of Allah,
that their journey and method are the most excellent of jour-
neys, that their path is the most excellent path, and that their
conduct is the purest. In fact, if the intellect of the intellectuals,
the wisdom of the wise, and the knowledge of those scholars
who discover the secrets of the Sacred Law were gathered in
order to change something of their method and conduct, or
to replace it for something better than it, they would not find
any way to do that. All their states of activity and inactivity are
plucked from the niche of the light of Prophecy. And there is,
beyond the light of Prophecy, no light on the face of the earth
by which one may seek illumination.
5
The description continues up to his words, ‘Until they, while awake,

witness the Angels and the spirits of the Prophets. They hear their voices
and they take lessons from them. And then their state of witnessing is
elevated from witnessing forms and appearances, to levels which are
very difficult to articulate.’
His student, Abū Bakr ibn al-¢Arabī, one of the Imams of the Mālikīs
said in his book Qānūn al-Ta’wīl:
The Sufis opined, that when a person attains purity of the soul
and purification of the heart, cuts off all attachments and severs
the evil ties of the world, such as status, wealth and unnecessary
associations, and turns to Allah (ta ¢ālā) completely, perpet-
ually in his knowledge and constantly in his actions, hearts
will be unveiled to him, he will see the Angels and hear their
speech, and he will see the spirits of the Prophets and listen
to their words.
Then he said, ‘Seeing the Prophets and Angels and hearing their
speech is possible for the believer as an ennoblement and for the dis-
believer as a punishment.’
Sheikh ¢Izz al-Dīn ibn ¢Abd al-Salām said in al-Qawā’id al-Kubrā:
Ibn al-Hājj said, in al-Madkhal, ‘Seeing the Prophet s while

awake is a narrow door. Few people will experience it, except
the one who has a very rare attribute in this time. Rather, that
attribute is non-existent for the most part. However, we do
not deny that it can occur to some elevated Saints whose inner
and outer being Allah has protected. Some of the scholars of
the exterior rulings had negated the vision of the Prophet s
while awake. They reasoned that the temporal essence cannot
see the permanent essence. The Prophet s is in the abode of
permanence while the one who [ostensibly] sees him is in
the ephemeral abode. However, Sīdī Abū Muhammīd ibn Abī
Jamrah had removed this problem and refuted it by the fact
that the believer will see Allah after he dies, while Allah does
not die. And every one of them dies seventy times a day.”
Qāḍī Sharaf al-Dīn Hibah Allah ibn ¢Abd al-Raḥīm al-Bārizī said,
in his book Tawthīq ¢Ura al-Īmān:
6
Al-Bayhaqī said, in his Kitāb al-I¢tiqād, ‘After the Prophets are

caused to pass away, their spirits are returned to them. So, they
are alive with their Lord, like the martyrs. And our Prophet s
saw a number of them on the night of Mi¢rāj. And, he stated,
and his statements are all true, that our prayers upon him are
presented before him, and our greetings are delivered to him.
And he stated that Allah (ta ¢ālā) has prevented the earth from
consuming the flesh of the Prophets.’
Al-Bārizī stated, ‘We have heard of a group of the Saints of our time
and prior to this time, that saw the Prophet s alive, while awake, after
his death.’ This was mentioned by Sheikh al-Islām, Imam Abū al-Bayān
ibn Muḥammad ibn Mahfūẓ al-Dimashqī in his Nazīmah.
Sheikh Akmal al-Dīn al-Bābartī al-Ḥanafī said in his Sharḥ al-
Mashāriq on the hadith, ‘If someone sees me in a dream…’1
The meeting of two people in wakefulness or in a dream is due

to factor that unifies them. And those factors have five universal
bases: sharing in a single being, in one or more attributes, in
one or more states, in actions or in degree. All the conceivable
relationships between two things, or between many things,
return without exception to these five. And in accordance with
the domination of that which makes them similar over that
which makes them different, or its being dominated by them,
their meetings will be plentiful or few. And one characteristic
may dominate its opposite, such that love may increase to the
point that two people become nearly inseparable. Or, it could
be the opposite. But if someone attains all five fundamental
factors with regard to the spirits of the perfect people of the
past, and their relationship becomes confirmed, he may meet
with them whenever he wants.
Sheikh Ṣafī al-Dīn ibn Abī al-Manṣūr said in his Risālah, and Sheikh
¢Afīf al-Dīn al-Yāfi¢ī said in Rawḍ al-Rayāḥīn:
The Great Sheikh, the Exemplar of the Gnostic Shaykhs and the
blessing of the people of his time, Abū ¢Abdullāh al-Qurashī
said, ‘When great misguidance afflicted the abodes of Egypt,
1 That is the hadith mentioned above, from al-Bukhārī, ‘If someone sees
me in a dream, he will soon see me while awake…’
7
I concentrated on supplicating. It was said to me, “Don’t sup-

plicate. For none of your supplications regarding this matter
will be granted.” So, I travelled to Sham and when I came close
to the grave of the Khalīl s, the Khalīl met me and I said to
him, “O, Messenger of Allah! As I am your guest, supplicate
for the people of Egypt.” So, he supplicated for them and Allah
granted them relief.’
Al-Yāfi¢ī then said, ‘His words “The Khalīl met me…” are true and
are only negated by an ignorant person who has no knowledge of the
states that overcome them, in which they witness the inner dominion
of the Heavens and the Earth and see the Prophets as living and not
dead, just as the Prophet s saw Mūsā (¢alayhi al-salām) on Earth, and
then saw him and a group of Prophets in the Heavens. And he heard
their speech. And it has been confirmed that whatever is possible for the
Prophets as a prophetic miracle is also possible for the Saints as a saintly
miracle. However, the latter does not occur in response to a challenge.
Sheikh Sirj al-Dīn ibn al-Mulaqqin said in his Ṭabaqāt al-Awliyā’:
Sheikh ¢Abd al-Qādir al-Kaylānī said, ‘I saw the Messenger of

Allah s before Ẓuhr, and he said to me, “O, my son! Why do
you not speak?” I said, “O, my father! I am a non-Arab. How
can I speak before the eloquent Arabic speakers of Baghdad?”
He said, “Open your mouth.” So, I opened it and he spit in it
seven times. Then, he said, “Speak to people. And call to the
path of your Lord with wisdom and beautiful sermons.” So, I
prayed Ẓuhr and sat and a large group of people came to me.
But I became confused. Then, I saw ¢Ali standing opposite
me in the gathering. He said to me, “O, my son! Why do you
not speak?” I said, “O, my father! I have become perplexed.”
So, he said to me, “Open your mouth.” I opened it and he spit
into it six times. I said to him, “Why did you not complete
the seven times?” He said, “Out of courtesy to the Messenger
of Allah s.” Then, he disappeared from me and I said, “Pene-
trating thought dives into the ocean of the heart for pearls of
gnosis. And extracts them to the shore of the chest, where the
translator of the tongue calls to them and sells them for the
price of breaths spent in excellent obedience, in the houses
that Allah has allowed to be raised.”’
8
He (Ibn al-Mulaqqin) also said, in the biography of Sheikh Khalīfah

ibn Mūsā al-Nahr Milkī:
He would frequently see the Messenger of Allah s in both

wakefulness and dreams. And, it is said that he received the
majority of his practice through a Prophetic order, either while
awake or in dreams. In one night, he saw him seventeen times.
He said to him, on one of those times, “O, Khalīfah! Do not
become vexed with me. There are Saints who have died of
anxiousness to see me.”
Al-Kamāl al-Udfuwī mentioned in al-Ṭali’ al-Sa¢īd, in the biography

of al-Safi Abū ¢Abdullāh ibn Yaḥyā al-Aswānī:
He lived in Akhmīm. And he is from the companions of Abū

Yaḥyā ibn Shāfi¢. He was famous for his piety and had many
unveilings and Karāmāt. Ibn Daqīq al-¢Īd, Ibn Ni¢mān and the
Quṭb al-¢Asqalānī said about him, ‘He would mention that he
used to see the Prophet s and meet with him.’
Sheikh ¢Abd al-Ghaffār ibn Nūḥ al-Qūṣi said in his book, al-Waḥīd,
‘He was from the companions of Sheikh Abū Yaḥyā Abū ¢Abdullāh
al-Aswānī who lived in Akhmīm. He would relate that he used to see
the Messenger of Allah s every hour, to such an extent that nearly no
hour would pass without him speaking about him.’
The author of al-Waḥid also said, ‘Abū al-¢Abbās al-Mursī had a
communion with the Prophet s, such that when he greeted the Proph-
et s, he would respond to his greeting, and when he spoke to him, he
would answer him.”
Sheikh Tāj al-Dīn ibn ¢Ata’ Allah said, in Laṭā’if al-Minan:
A man said to Sheikh Abū al-¢Abbās al-Mursī, ‘O, my Master!

Shake my hand with your palm. For you have met such and
such a person and seen such and such a land.’ He replied, ‘By
Allah! I have not shaken the hand of anyone, with this palm,
other than the Messenger of Allah s.’
The Sheikh also said, ‘If the Messenger of Allah s were veiled from
me for the blinking of an eye, I would not count myself among the
Muslims.’
9
Sheikh Ṣafī al-Dīn ibn Abī al-Manṣūr said, in his Risālah, and Sheikh
¢Abd al-Ghaffār said in his al-Waḥīd:
Sheikh Abū al-Ḥasan al-Wannani said, ‘Sheikh Abū al-¢Abbās

al-Tanjī informed me: “Sīdī Aḥmad al-Rifā¢ī said to me, ‘I am
not your sheikh. Your sheikh is ¢Abd al-Rahīm in Qinā.’ So, I
traveled to Qinā and entered upon Sheikh ¢Abd al-Rahīm. He
asked me, “Do you know the Messenger of Allah s?” I said,
“No.” He said, “Travel to Bayt al-maqdis.” And when I planted
my two feet, behold, the Heaven, the Earth, the Throne and
the Footstool were all filled with the Messenger of Allah s!”
So, I returned to the Sheikh and he asked me, “Do you know
the Messenger of Allah s?” I said, “Yes.” He said, “Then, your
path is complete. The Quṭbs were not Quṭbs, the Awtād were
not Awtād and none of the Saints were Saints, except through
the knowledge of the Messenger of Allah s.”’
The author of al-Waḥīd said:
Among those who I saw in Makkah was Sheikh ¢Abdullāh

al-Dallāṣī. He informed me that, in his entire life, only one of
his prayers had been valid. He said, ‘That was when I was in
Masjid al-Haram, praying the dawn prayer. When the Imam
performed the takbīr taḥrīmah and I followed him in that, I was
seized by a state and saw the Messenger of Allah s praying in
front of me, with the ten who were promised paradise behind
him. So, I prayed with them. That was in the year 673 AH. In
the first rak¢ah, he s recited surah al-Muddaththir and in the
second al-Naba’. And, when he ended the prayer, he prayed with
the following supplication: “O, Allah! make us guided guides.
Do not make us misguided or misguiding, covetous by your
generosity nor desirous of that which is with you, because Your
grace was upon us before You created us and before we came
to be. Thus, to You belongs all praise for that. There is no god
but You.” When the Prophet s finished, the Imam ended the
prayer, and I recognized his taslīm, so I too ended the prayer.’
Sheikh Ṣafī al-Dīn said, in his Risālah:
10
Sheikh Abū al-¢Abbās al-Ḥadād said, ‘I entered upon the

Prophet s once. I found him writing down those Saints whose
sainthood was known publicly. He wrote down my brother
Muḥammad among the famous Saints.’ His brother was a great
Saint. He had a light on his face that made his sainthood evident
to everyone. So, we asked the Sheikh about that. He said, ‘The
Messenger of Allah s blew into my face. And that breath left
the mark of this light.’
Sheikh Ṣafī al-Dīn also said:
I saw the great, majestic Sheikh, Abū ¢Abdullāh al-Qurṭubī,

one of the greatest of the companions of Sheikh al-Qurashī. He
lived most of the time in Madinah. And he used to commune
with the Prophet s, receive answers from him and hear his
returned greeting. The Messenger of Allah s once charged him
to take a letter to the king, al-Kāmil. He went to Egypt with that
letter, delivered it and returned to Madinah. He said, ‘Among
those who I saw in Egypt was the Sheikh Abū al-¢Abbās al-
¢Asqalānī, one of the most elect of the companions of Sheikh
al-Qurashī, the ascetic of Egypt of his time.’ Most of his time
at the end of his life was spent in Makkah. It is said that once
he entered upon the Messenger of Allah s, and the Prophet
s said to him, ‘May Allah take you by the hand, O, Aḥmad.’
It has also been narrated about one Saint that he was present in the
gathering of one jurist. The jurist narrated a hadith but the Saint said
to him, ‘That hadith is false.’ The jurist asked him, ‘How did you deter-
mine that?’ He said, ‘The Prophet s is standing over you and saying, “I
never said that hadith.”’ The veils were thus lifted from the jurist and
he saw him.
In the book al-Minaḥ al-Ilahiyyah fi Manāqib Sādat al-Wafā’iyyah
of Ibn Fāris, the author said:
I heard Sīdī ¢Ali (raḍiyallāhu ¢anhu) saying, ‘At the age of five,
I used to recite the Qur’an to a man who was called Sheikh
Ya¢qūb. One day, I came to him and I saw the Prophet s, while
awake and not asleep. He was wearing a white, cotton shirt.
Then, I saw the same shirt upon myself. He then said to me,
“Recite.” So, I recited surah al-Ḍuḥā and surah al-Sharh. He
11
then disappeared. When I reached twenty-one years of age, I

performed the taḥrīmah for the morning prayer in Qarāfah.
And I saw the Prophet s in front of me. He embraced me and
said, “As for the blessing of your Lord, declare it” (ad-Duhā 93:
11). From that time, I was given his speech.’
Sīdī al-Hajj Aḥmad al-Rifā¢ī said, in one of his Majāmi¢:

When my spirit was remote [from this place], I would send it forth,
To kiss its earth on my behalf, for it is my representative,
But now, the physical form that was represented is present,
So, stretch out your right hand that I may touch it with my two lips.
Thus, the noble hand came out of the grave and he kissed it.
Sheikh Burhān al-Dīn al-Biqā¢ī said, in his Mu¢jam:
Imam Abū al-Faḍl ibn Abī al-Faḍl al-Nawīrī narrated to us that

when Sayyed Nūr al-Dīn al-Ayjī, the father of the Sharīf ¢Afīf
al-Dīn arrived at the noble grave and said, ‘Peace be upon you,
O, Prophet, and the mercy of Allah and His blessings’, those
who were present with him heard a voice coming from the
grave, saying, ‘And upon you be peace, O, my son.’
Hafiz Muḥibb al-Dīn ibn Najjār said in his history book:
Abū Aḥmad Dawūd ibn ¢Alī ibn Hibat Allah ibn Maslamah
informed us that Abū al-Faraj al-Mubārak ibn ¢Abdullāh ibn
Muḥammad ibn al-Nuqur said, ‘Our Sheikh, Abū Naṣr ¢Abd al-
Wahīd ibn ¢Abd al-Mālik ibn Muḥammad ibn Abī Sa¢d al-Sufī
al-Karkhī told us, “I performed Hajj and visited the Prophet
s. While we were sitting next to the [Prophetic] apartment,
Sheikh Abū Bakr al-Dayyār Bakrī entered, stood adjacent to
the face of the Prophet s and said, ‘Peace be upon you, O,
Messenger of Allah.’ and I heard a voice from inside of the
apartment say, ‘And upon you be peace, O, Abū Bakr.’ And all
those who were present heard it.”’
In the book Misbāḥ al- Ẓulām fī al-Mustaghīthīna bi Khayr al-Anām,

by Shams al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Mūsā ibn Nu¢man, the author said:
12
I heard Yūsuf ibn ¢Ali al-Zinātī tell the story of a Hashimite

woman who was a resident of Madinah. Some of the servants
would abuse her. So, she said, ‘I sought help from the Proph-
et s. And I heard a voice from the grave saying, “Are you not
from my family? So, be patient as I was patient,” or something
with the same meaning. Thus, my affliction was removed from
me and the three servants who had been abusing me died.’
In the Dalā’il, Ibn al-Sam¢ānī said:
Abū al-Qāsim ¢Abd al-Raḥmān ibn ¢Umar ibn Tamīm

al-Mu’adhdhan informed us that ¢Alī ibn Ibrāhim ibn ¢Allān
narrated to him that ¢Alī ibn Muḥammad ibn ¢Ali informed
him that Aḥmad ibn al-Haytham al-Ṭā’ī narrated to him that
his father narrated to him on the authority of his father, on the
authority of Salama ibn Kuhal, on the authority of Abū Ṣādiq,
that ¢Alī ibn Abī Ṭālib (raḍiyallāhu ¢anhu) said, ‘A Bedouin
came to us after we had buried the Messenger of Allah s. He
threw himself upon the grave of the Prophet s and sprinkled
some of its dust on his head. Then he said, “O, Messenger of
Allah! You have spoken and we have listened. You received
from Allah [what you received]. And we received from you
[what we received]. Among that which was revealed upon you
by Allah is ‘If, after they had wronged themselves, they would
have come to you, and sought the forgiveness of Allah and the
Messenger would have sought forgiveness for them, they would
have found Allah oft-accepting of repentance, Very Merciful’
[al-Nisā’ 4: 64]. I have certainly wronged myself. And I have
come to you that you may seek forgiveness for me.” A call came
from the grave that he had been forgiven.’
I have also seen the following text, in the book Muzīl al-Shubuhāt
fī Ithbāt al-Karāmāt of Imam ¢Imād al-Dīn Ismā¢īl ibn Hibat Allah ibn
Bāṭīsh:
Among the evidences that confirm the Karāmāt, are some

traditions that have been transmitted from the Companions
and the Tābi¢īn, and those after them. Among them is Imam
Abu Bakr al-Ṣiddīq (raḍiyallāhu ¢anhu). He said to ¢Ā’ishah
(raḍiyallāhu ¢anhā), ‘They are your two brothers and your
13
two sisters.’ She replied, ‘My two brothers are Muḥammad

and ¢Abd al-Raḥmān. But who are my two sisters, when my
only sister is Asmā’?’ he replied, ‘I have been inspired that the
child which the daughter of Khārijah is carrying is a girl.’ And
Umm Kulthūm was born.
Also, among them, is ¢Umar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb (raḍiyallāhu ¢anhu)

in the story of Sāriyah, when he said, while giving the khutbah,
‘O, Sāriyah! The mountain! The mountain!’ And Allah caused
Sāriyah to hear his words while he was in Nahavand. There
is also a story related about him and the Nile river. He sent a
messenger to it and it began to flow after it had stopped.
There is also the story of ¢Uthmān ibn ¢Affān (raḍiyallāhu
¢anhu). ¢Abdullāh ibn Salām said, ‘I then came to ¢Uthmān ibn
‘Affān (raḍiyallāhu ¢anhu), while he was besieged, to greet him
with peace. He said, “Welcome, my brother. I saw the Mes-
senger of Allah s in that window. He said, ‘O, Uthman! They
have besieged you.’ I said, ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘They have caused you
thirst.’ I said, ‘Yes.’ So, he brought me a container with water. I
drank to my fill, until I felt its coolness between my two breasts
and between my two shoulder blades. Then, he said to me, ‘If
you prefer, you will be given victory against them. Or, if you
wish, you may break your fast with us.’ I elected to break my
fast with him.” And he was killed on that day.’
This story is well-known and famous, narrated in the books of Hadith

with the isnād by which it was narrated in the Musnad of al-Ḥārith ibn
Abī Usāmah. And the author [of Muzīl al-Shubuhāt fī Ithbāt al-Karāmāt]
has understood this vision to be while awake. If not, then it would not
be proper to mention it among karāmāt, because there is no distinction
among people regarding the ability to see [him] in a dream. It is not
among the preternatural events that are numbered among the karāmāt.
And, even those who deny karāmāt do not deny it (the possibility of
seeing him in a dream).
Something else that Ibn Bāṭīsh said in the abovementioned book is
the following:
Among them is Abū al-Ḥusayn Muḥammad ibn Sam¢ūn

al-Baghdadi al-Ṣūfī. Abū Ṭāhir Muḥammad ibn ¢Alī al-¢Allān
said, ‘I visited Abū al-Ḥusayn ibn Sam¢ūn one day in his gath-
14
ering of counsels. He was sitting upon his chair speaking. And

Abū al-Fatḥ al-Qawās was sitting on one side of his chair. He
was overtaken by drowsiness and slept. So, Abū al-Ḥusayn
stopped speaking for an hour until Abū al-Fatḥ woke up and
raised his head. Abū al-Ḥusayn said to him, ‘You saw the
Prophet s in your dream.’ He said, ‘Yes’. He said to him, ‘That
is why I stopped speaking for an hour, out of fear that I would
disturb you and cut off your experience.’
This intimates that Ibn Sam¢ūn saw the Prophet s when he was
present and Abū al-Fatḥ saw him in his dream.
And Abū Bakr ibn Abyaḍ said in his short work:
I heard Abū al-Hasan Bannāna al-Kamāl al-Zāhid saying, ‘One

of our companions narrated to me that there was a man in
Makkah who was called Ibn Thābit. He had left Makkah for
Madinah for sixty years, with only the intention of greeting
the Prophet s and then returning. However, during that time,
he was delayed by some business, or for some reason. He said
that when he finally sat before the [Prophetic] apartment, while
he was between sleep and wakefulness, he saw the Prophet s.
He was saying to him, “O, Ibn Thābit! You did not visit us. For
we visited you.”’
some important points
The first is that the vision of the Prophet s while awake occurs most
often with the heart. Then, one is raised to the point that he sees him
with his eyes. And we have already mentioned what Qāḍī Abū Bakr ibn
al-¢Arabī had to say about both kinds of visions. However, the vision
with the eyes is not like the ordinary vision known among people, where
one of them may see the other. It is a meeting that takes place due to
a spiritual state, a spiritual experience of the Barzakh, and an ecstatic
state that is only known by those who experience it. And we mentioned
what was related by Sheikh ¢Abdullāh al-Dallāṣī, ‘… when the Imam
performed the taḥrīmah, I also performed it. Then, I was overtaken
by a state and saw the Messenger of Allah s …’ With the words, ‘… I
was overtaken by a state,’ he was alluding to the aforementioned state.
15
The second, is whether or not the vision is of the being of the Mes-
senger of Allah s in both spirit and body. Or, if it is a semblance of him.
The people of spiritual states that have seen him say that it is the latter.
Al-Ghazālī explicitly stated that, saying:
The meaning is not that someone sees his physical body. Rather,
it is a semblance. And that semblance became a means by which
one perceives the meaning that is within himself. At times, that
tool may be real. And at times it is an imaginary form. But the
self is not an imaginary semblance. Thus, the form one sees is
not the spirit of the Chosen One, nor his person. Rather, it is
confirmed to be a semblance of him.
He continued:
Similar to this is when someone sees Allah (ta ¢ālā) in a dream.

His Essence is exalted above shape and form. However, he is
acquainted with him by means of a perceptible semblance, such
as light or something else. But that semblance will be true in
its being a means to knowing. Thus, the one who sees such a
dream will say, ‘I have seen Allah in a dream.’ Yet, he will not
mean that he has seen the Essence of Allah, as he would say
with created beings.
However, Qāḍī Abū Bakr ibn al-¢Arabī made a distinction, saying, ‘If
someone sees the Prophet s in his well-known description, it will be a
real perception, while if he sees him upon a different description, then
it will be a perception of that semblance.’ And, this saying of his is very
excellent because there is no impediment to seeing his noble being in
body and spirit because he s, and all the rest of the Prophets, are alive.
Their spirits are returned to them after they have passed away. And,
they are given permission to leave their graves and influence the upper
and lower realms of the Divine Kingdom.
Al-Bayhaqī authored a short work on the life of the Prophets. He
also said, in Dalā’il al-Nubuwwah, ‘The Prophets are alive with their
Lord like the martyrs.’ And he said, in Kitāb al-I¢tiqād:
After the Prophets pass away, their spirits are returned to them.
So, they are alive with their Lord like the martyrs. Ustadh Abū
Manṣūr ¢Abd al-Qāhir ibn Ṭāhir al-Baghdādī said, ‘The theo-
16
logical researchers among our companions have determined

that our Prophet s is alive after his passing away, that he is
elated by the acts of obedience of his nation and saddened by
the disobedient among them, and that the prayer of whoever
prays upon him from his nation is conveyed to him.’
He also said that the Prophets do not disintegrate, nor does
the earth consume any part of them. Mūsā passed away in his
time and our Prophet s informed us that he saw him praying
in his grave on the night of Ascension, and that he saw him
again in the fourth heaven. He also saw Ādam and Ibrāhīm.
If this foundation is valid for us, then we say that our Proph-
et s has become alive after his passing away. And he retains
his Prophethood.
Al-Qurṭubī said, transmitting from his sheikh, in al-Tadhkirah, on

the hadith of the swooning:
Death is not complete nonbeing. It is only the transference

from one state to another. This is demonstrated by the fact that,
after the martyrs are killed and die, they are alive, provided for,
elated, and rejoicing. And that is the attribute of the living in
this world. If that is the case of the martyrs, the Prophets are
more deserving of that. It is authentic that the earth does not
consume the bodies of the Prophets, and that he s met with
the Prophets on the night of his journey, in Jerusalem and in
the Heavens.
He saw Mūsā standing and praying in his grave. And, he s
informed us that he returns the greeting of peace to everyone
that greets him. There are many other such evidences that
bring about sure knowledge that the death of the Prophets
only means that they are hidden from us, such that we do not
perceive them, even though they are existing and alive. That
is the same as the state of the Angels. They are existing and
alive, though none of our species sees them, except someone
that Allah elects for karāmāt.
Abū Ya¢lā narrated in his Musnad and al-Bayhaqī, in Kitāb Hayāt

al-Anbiyā’, from Anas, that the Prophet s said, ‘The Prophets are not
left in their graves after forty days. Rather, they pray before Allah (ta
¢ālā) until the trumpet is blown.’ And Sufyān al-Thawrī narrated, in
17
his Jāmi¢, ‘One of our Sheikhs said that Sa¢īd ibn Musayyab said, “No
Prophet remains in his grave more than forty nights without being ele-
vated.”’ Al-Bayhaqī said, “According to this, they are like all other living
beings. They will be wherever Allah (ta ¢ālā) places them.”
¢Abd al-Razzāq narrated in his Muṣannif from al-Thawri, on the
authority of Abū al-Miqdām, that Sa¢īd ibn Musayyab said, ‘No Prophet
remains in the earth more than forty days.’ Abū Miqdām is Thābit ibn
Hurmuz, the Sheikh of Ṣaliḥ.
Ibn Ḥibbān, al-Ṭabarānī in his Kabīr, and Abū Na¢īm in al-Ḥilyah
narrate that Anas said, ‘The Messenger of Allah s said, “No Prophet dies
and remains in his grave, except forty mornings.”’ Imam al-Haramayn
said, in al-Nihāyah, and al-Rafi¢ī in al-Sharḥ, that it has been narrated
that the Prophet s said, ‘I am more noble to Allah than that He should
leave me in my grave after three [days].’ Imam al-Haramayn added
that, in another narration, he said, ‘… more than two [days] …’ Abū
al-Ḥasan ibn al-Zāghūnī al-Ḥanbalī mentioned that one of his books
has the narration that Allah will not leave any Prophet in his grave more
than half a day.
Imam Badr al-Dīn ibn al-Ṣāhib said, in his Tadhkirah:
Chapter: On His s Life in the Barzakh After His Death

This has been explicitly stated and alluded to by the Lawgiver.
And it has also been intimated in the Qur’an: ‘Do not deem
those who are killed in the way of Allah to be dead. Rather, they
are living in the Presence of their Lord and provided for.’ (Āl
¢Imrān 3: 169). The state mentioned [in the verse] is life after
death in the Barzakh. It is attained by the unique souls among
the martyrs of this nation. Their state is greater and superior to
those who have this degree, especially in the Barzakh. However,
there is no one in this Ummah whose degree is greater than
that of the Prophet s. Rather, they only attained this degree
due to their purification and dedication to the religion. Also,
they only became deserving of that degree through martyrdom.
And, martyrdom was attained by the Prophet s in the most
complete manner.
The Prophet s also said, ‘I passed by Mūsā on the night
I was caused to journey near the red dune. He was standing
and praying in his grave.’ This hadith confirms explicitly the
18
life of Mūsā. For, he described him as praying and standing

and those are not descriptions of the spirit. Only the body can
be described as such. In fact, his specification of the grave is
evidence of this. For, if the one being described were a spirit,
there would be no need for specifying the grave. There is no one
who would say that the spirits of the Prophets are imprisoned
in their graves along with their bodies, while the spirits of the
martyrs and believers are in Paradise.
And there is the hadith of Ibn ¢Abbās [in which he said]:
We travelled with the Messenger of Allah s between

Makkah and Madinah. We passed a valley and he said,
‘What valley is this?’ It was replied, Wādī al-Azraq. He
said, ‘It is as if I am looking at Mūsā passing by this
valley, placing his two fingers in his ears, crying to Al-
lah while reciting talbiyah’.2 Then, we travelled until
we came to a mountain pass. He said, ‘It is as if I am
looking at Yunus passing through this mountain pass,
riding a red she-camel and wearing a wool cloak, reciting
the talbiyah.’ At that point, he was asked how he could
mention their Hajj and talbiyah, when they had passed
on and are in the next abode and that abode is not the
abode of works. He answered that the martyrs are alive
with their Lord and provided for.
Thus, it is not farfetched that they should perform Hajj, pray

and draw near [to Allah] by any way they are able. And even
if they are in the Hereafter, they are also in this world which is
the abode of acts, until its appointed term has elapsed. It will be
followed by the Hereafter, which is the abode of recompense,
in which works will be cut off.
These are the words of Qāḍī ¢Iyaḍ. And if Qāḍī ¢Iyaḍ is
saying that they perform Hajj with their bodies and leave their
graves, how can anyone deny the departure of the Prophet s
from his grave, by alleging that if the Prophet s performs Hajj
or prays with his body in the Heaven, then he is not buried
in his grave?
2 Reciting ‘Labbayk Allāhumma labbayk…’

19
From the sum total of these texts and hadiths we can conclude that
the Prophet s is alive with his body and spirit, and that he can affect
the world. And, he goes wherever he wishes in the regions of the Earth
and in the Hidden Kingdom. He is in the same form as he was before he
passed away. None of it was changed. However, he is hidden from the
physical eyes just as the Angels have been hidden, despite the fact that
their bodies are alive. But, whenever Allah wills to lift the veils from the
person whom He wills to honour with his vision, that person will see
him in the form in which he is existing. There is no impediment to that.
Nor is there any occasion to specify that it be a vision of his likeness.
The third important point is that it was asked, ‘How can a number
of people who are distant from one another see him at the same time?’
It was recited:
Just as the sun is in the middle of the sky, while its light,
Covers many lands in the East and the West.
In the Manāqib of Sheikh Tāj al-Dīn Ibn ¢Ata’ Allāh, one of his
students relates:
I performed Hajj. When I was performing ṭawāf, I saw Sheikh

Tāj al-Dīn performing ṭawāf. I intended to greet him when he
finished, however when he finished his ṭawāf, I went towards
him but could not find him. Then I saw him the same way on
¢Arafah and in all of the different stages. When I returned to
Cairo, I asked about the Sheikh. I was told he was in a good
state. I asked if he had travelled and they responded that he
hadn’t. So, I went to the Sheikh and greeted him. He said to
me, ‘Who did you see?’ I responded, ‘My Master! I saw you.’
He said, ‘O, so-and-so! The man of grand Sainthood fills the
entire creation. If the Quṭb were called to from a hole, he would
answer.’
If the Quṭb fills the creation, then the Master of Messengers s does
so in a greater way. And we have already mentioned that Sheikh Abū
al- ¢Abbās al-Tanjī said, ‘And behold, the heaven and earth, the Throne
and the Footstool, were all filled with the Messenger of Allah s.’
The fourth important point is that someone may allege that such
a vision would affirm companionship for the one who sees him. The
response is that this is not necessarily true. If we were to say that what
20
is seen is a semblance of him, then companionship is not established

because companionship is only established by seeing his noble being
in body and spirit. And, if we were to say that what is seen is his being,
another requirement for companionship is that one see him while he
is in the physical world. But this vision happened in the hidden world,
a vision that does not establish companionship. This is also supported
by the hadiths that were narrated that his entire community was pre-
sented to him. He saw them and they saw him. But that did not affirm
companionship for all of them because it was a vision in the hidden
world, which does not indicate companionship.
21
Conclusion
Aḥmad narrated in his Musnad, and al-Kharā’iṭī in Makārim al-Akhlāq,

by way of Abū al-¢Āliyah, that a man from the Anṣār said:
I left my family seeking the Prophet s. Behold, he was standing

with a man who was facing him. I figured that they were doing
something important. The Messenger of Allah s stood for so
long until I became upset with [the man] from standing for
so long. When the person went away, I said, ‘O, Messenger of
Allah! That man stood with you for so long that I became upset
with him because of standing for so long.’ He said, ‘Did you
actually see him?’ I said, ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘Do you know who he
was?’ I said, ‘No’. He said, ‘That was Jibrīl. He kept counselling
me regarding my neighbour until I believed he would make
him my heir.’ Then he said, ‘If you had greeted him, he would
have returned your greeting.’
Abū Mūsā al-Madīnī narrated in al-Ma¢rifah that Tamīm ibn Salamah

said, ‘While I was with the Prophet s, a man went away from him. I
looked at him as he was walking away, wearing a turban which he had
hung behind his back. I said, ‘O, Messenger of Allah! Who is that?’ He
said, ‘That is Jibrīl.’
Aḥmad and al-Ṭabarānī narrated, and al-Bayhaqī in al-Dalā’il, that
Ḥārithah ibn al-Nu¢mān said, ‘I passed by the Messenger of Allah s
and with him was Jibrīl. So, I greeted him. When we returned and the
Prophet s had left him, he said, ‘Did you see the man that was with
me?’ I said, ‘Yes’. He said, ‘That was Jibrīl and he returned your greeting.’
Ibn Sa¢d narrated that Hārithah said, ‘I saw Jibrīl two times in my life.’
Aḥmad and al-Bayhaqī narrated that Ibn ¢Abbās said:
23
My father and I were with the Messenger of Allah s. There

was a man with him speaking to him privately. So, he was
not paying attention to my father. So, we exited, and he said
to me, ‘O, my son! Do you see my nephew ignoring me?’ I
said to him, ‘My father! There was a man with him speaking
to him privately.’ So, he returned and said, ‘O, Messenger of
Allah! I said to ¢Abdullāh such and such a thing. And he said
that there was a man with you speaking to you privately. Was
there anyone with you?’ He said, ‘Did you really see him, O,
¢Abdullāh?’ I said, ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘That was Jibrīl. He was the
one that distracted me from you.’
Ibn Sa¢d narrated that Ibn ¢Abbās said, ‘I saw Jibrīl twice.’
Al-Bayhaqī narrated that Ibn ¢Abbās said:
The Messenger of Allah s visited a man from the Anṣār. But

when he came near to his home, he heard him speaking with-
in. When he entered, he didn’t see anyone. So, the Messenger
of Allah s asked him, ‘With whom were you speaking?’ He
responded, ‘A man came to me. Except for you, I have not seen
anyone who sat more nobly or spoke more beautifully.’ He said,
‘That was Jibrīl. There are among you men that if one of them
were to swear by Allah, Allah would make good on his oath’
Abū Bakr ibn Abī Dawūd narrated in Kitāb al-Maṣa’if that Ja¢far
said, Abu Bakr used to hear the private conversations that Jibrīl had
with the Prophet s.’
Muḥammad ibn Naṣr al-Marūzī narrated in his Kitāb al-Ṣalāh on
the authority of Hudhayfah ibn al-Yamān, that the latter came to the
Prophet s and said to him, ‘While I was praying, I heard someone
speaking to me saying, “O, Allah! To You belongs all praise; to You
belongs the dominion entirely. In Your hand is all good. And to You
returns the affair in its entirety, whether known or done in secret. You
are worthy that You should be praised. Indeed, You have power over all
things. O, Allah! Forgive me all my past sins. Protect me in that which
remains of my life. And provide me with good works by which You will
be satisfied with me.”’ The Prophet s said, ‘He was teaching you how
to praise your Lord.’
Muḥammad ibn Naṣr narrated that Abū Hurayrah said, ‘While I was
praying, I heard someone saying, “O, Allah! To You belongs all praise…”’
24
And he mentioned the rest of the above hadith.

Ibn Abī al-Dunyā narrated in his Kitāb al-Dhikr that Anas ibn Mālik
said, ‘Ubayy ibn Ka¢b said, “I will enter the Masjid, pray and praise Allah
with a praise by which no one else has praised Him.” After he finished
praying and sat to praise Allah and extol Him, he heard a loud voice
behind him saying:
O, Allah! to you belongs all praise. To You belongs the domin-

ion entirely. In Your hands is all good. To You returns the entire
affair, what is known of it and what is secret. To You belongs
all praise. Indeed, You have power over all things. Forgive me
my past sins. And protect me in that which remains of my life.
And provide me with pure works by which You will be satisfied
with me. And accept my repentance.
So, he came to the Messenger of Allah s and told him that. He said,
“That was Jibrīl.”’
Al-Ṭabarānī and al-Bayhaqī narrated that Muḥammad ibn Salamah
said, ‘I passed by the Messenger of Allah s while he was placing his
cheek on the check of someone. So, I didn’t greet him. When I returned,
he said to me, “Why did you not greet me?” I said, “O, Messenger of
Allah! I saw you do something with someone that I have not seen you
do with anyone else. So, I hated to interrupt your conversation. But who
was it, O, Messenger of Allah?” He said, “It was Jibrīl.”’
Al-Ḥākim narrated that ¢Ā’ishah said, ‘I saw Jibrīl standing in this
room of mine and the Messenger of Allah s was speaking to him pri-
vately. I said, “O, Messenger of Allah! Who is that?” He said, “Who did
he seem like to you?” I said, “Daḥyah.” He said, “You saw Jibrīl.”’
Al-Bayhaqī narrated that Ḥudhayfah said:
The Messenger of Allah s left and I followed him. And he

met someone and said to me, ‘O, Ḥudhayfah! Did you see
the person who met with me?’ I said, ‘Yes’. He said, ‘That was
one of the Angels. He had never descended to the Earth. He
asked permission of his Lord and greeted me. He gave me
glad tidings that Hasan and Husayn are the two leaders of
the youth of Paradise, and that Fatimah is the leader of the
women of Paradise.’
25
It has been narrated by a number of reliable sources, namely Aḥmad;

al-Bukhārī in a mu¢allaq narration; Muslim; al-Nasā’ī; Abū Na¢īm; and
al-Bayhaqī, the latter two in Dalā’il al-Nubuwwah, on the authority of
Asyad bin Haḍīr, that while he was reading surah al-Baqarah at night
with his horse tied near him, his horse began to wander. He was quiet
and the horse became tranquil. He raised his head to the sky and there
was what seemed to be a cloud filled with lights that was rising towards
the sky, until he could no longer see it. When he woke, he related that to
the Messenger of Allah s. He said, ‘Those were Angels that descended
to hear your voice. If you had continued to recite, the morning would
have come, and people would have seen them. They would not have
been hidden from them.’
Al-Wāqidī and Ibn ¢Asākir narrated that ¢Abd al-Raḥmān ibn ¢Awf
said, ‘On the day of Badr, I saw two men. One of them was on the right
side of the Prophet s. The other was on his left side. They were fighting
viciously. There was a third behind him and a fourth in front of him.’
Isḥāq ibn Rāhawayhi narrated in his Musnad, Ibn Jarīr in his tafsīr,
and both Abū Na¢īm and al-Bayhaqī in their respective works Dalā’il
al-Nubuwwah that Abū Asyad al-Sā¢idī (raḍiyallāhu ¢anhu) said, after he
had become blind, ‘If I had been with you at Badr at this time, I would
have informed you of the mountain pass from the direction of which
the Angels came. I have no doubt about it, nor do I dispute regarding it.’
Al-Bayhaqī narrated that Abū Burdah ibn Niyār said,
On the Day of Badr, I brought three heads and placed them

before the Prophet s. I said, ‘O, Messenger of Allah! As for
the two heads, I killed them both. As for the third, I saw a tall
white man strike him. So, I took his head.’ The Messenger of
Allah s said, ‘That is so-and-so from the Angels.’
Al-Bayhaqī narrated that Ibn ¢Abbās said, ‘The Angels were taking
the forms of people who people recognized and encouraging them. I
came near to them and I heard them saying, “If they are spurred on by
our encouragement, they [their enemies] won’t be anything.” And that
is His words (ta ¢ālā): “When your Lord inspired the Angels: I am with
you. So, encourage the believers.”’ (al-Anfāl 8: 12)
Aḥmad, Ibn Sa¢d, Ibn Jarīr, and Abū Na¢īm, the latter in Dalā’il
al-Nubuwwah, narrated that Ibn ¢Abbās said:
26
The person who captured al-¢Abbās was Abū al-Yusr Ka¢b

ibn ¢Amr. Abū al-Yusr was a small man, while al-¢Abbās was
a large, tall man. The Messenger of Allah s said, ‘O, Abū Yusr!
How did you capture al-¢Abbās?’ He said, ‘O, Messenger of
Allah! A man who I had not seen before, or since, helped me
against him. He looked such-and-such a way.’ The Messenger
of Allah s said, ‘A noble Angel helped you.’
Ibn Sa¢d and al-Bayhaqī narrated on the authority of ¢Ammar ibn

Abī ¢Ammar that Ḥamza ibn ¢Abd al-Muṭṭalib said, ‘O, Messenger of
Allah! Show me Jibrīl in his original form.’ He said to him, ‘Sit’. So, he
sat and Jibrīl descended upon a piece of wood that was on the Ka¢bah.
The Prophet s said, ‘Look up.’ And he saw his two feet as blue-green
as the sea.
Ibn Abī al-Dunyā narrates in his Kitāb al-Qubūr, and al-Ṭabarānī
in his Awsaṭ, that Ibn ¢Umar said:
While I was a captive in the shrubs of Badr, a man came out

from a hole. He had chains on his neck. He said, ‘O, ¢Abdullāh!
Give me something to drink.’ Then another man came out of
the same whole. He had a whip in his hand. He said, ‘O, ¢Ab-
dullāh! Don’t give him anything to drink. He is a disbeliever.’
Then, he beat him with the whip until he returned to his hole.
I went to the Prophet s and informed him of that. He said to
me, ‘Did you really see him?’ I said, ‘Yes’. He said, ‘That was
the enemy of Allah, Abū Jahl. And that is his punishment until
the Day of Resurrection.’
This is evidence because the man he saw come out after him, with
the whip, is the Angel that has been charged with punishing him.
Ibn Abī al-Dunyā, al-Ṭabarānī and Ibn ¢Asākir all narrate, by way
of ¢Urwah ibn Ruwaym, on the authority of al-¢Irbāḍ ibn Sāriyah, the
Companion (raḍiyallāhu ¢anhu), that he was wishing to die. So he made
the supplication, ‘O, Allah! I have grown old of age and my bones have
become week. So, take me to Yourself.’ He said:
One day, while I was in the Masjid in Damascus and I was

praying and supplicating to be taken, a young man appeared
before me, a most beautiful person. He had a green adornment
on. He said, ‘What is this supplication that you are making?’
27
I said, ‘How should I supplicate?’ He said, ‘O, Allah! Beautify

my works and cause me to reach my appointed term.’ I said to
him, ‘Who are you? May Allah have mercy on you.’ He said,
‘I am Ratābīl, who removes the sadness from the hearts of the
believers.’ Then he went away and I no longer saw anyone.
Ibn ¢Asākir narrated in his Tārīkh That Sa¢īd ibn Sinān said:
I came to Jerusalem intending to pray. I entered the Masjid

and, while I was praying, I heard someone with two wings
who had turned to me, murmuring, ‘Glory to the One who
is perpetual and eternal. Glory to the One who is Living and
Self-subsistent. Glory to the Holy King. Glory to the Lord of the
Angels and the spirit. Glory to Allah and may He be praised.
Glory to the Most Exalted. Blessed and Exalted is He.’ Then,
another person came murmuring the same thing. Then another
one after that one. They were saying it to each other until they
filled the Masjid. One of them came close to me and said, ‘O,
son of Ādam’. I said, ‘Yes’. He said, ‘Do not fear; they are Angels.’
addendum
From that which can be added here is that which Abū Dāwūd narrated
by way of Abū ¢Umayr ibn Anas, on the authority of some of his uncles
among the Anṣār, that ¢Abdullāh ibn Zayd said, ‘O, Messenger of Allah!
I was between sleep and wakefulness when someone came to me and
taught me the adhān.’ ¢Umar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb had seen the same person
before that. However, he hid it for twenty days.
Also, in Kitāb al-Ṣalāh by Abū Na¢īm al-Faḍl ibn Dakīn [it is nar-
rated] that ¢Abdullāh ibn Zayd said, ‘If it were not for my suspecting
myself of being deceived, I would have said that I had not been asleep.’
It has also been narrated in al-Sunan of Abū Dāwūd by way of Ibn
Abī Layla that a man from the Anṣār came and said:
O Messenger of Allah! I saw a man as if he had two green

robes on. He gave the adhan, then he sat for a time. Then he
said something similar to it, except that he added, ‘Qad qāmat
al-ṣalāh.’ If it were not for what people would say, I would say
28
that I was awake and not sleeping. The Messenger of Allah s

said, ‘Allah has shown you good.’
Sheikh Walī al-Dīn al-¢Irāqī said, in his Sharḥ Sunan Abū Dāwūd, ‘His
words “I was between sleep and wakefulness” are problematic, because
one is either asleep or awake. So, what he meant was that his sleep was
light, close to wakefulness. It is as if he was at an intermediary stage
between sleep and wakefulness.’
I say, it is more enlightening to interpret it according to the states
that the people of spiritual states experience, where they witness what-
ever they witness and hear whatever they hear. And the Companions
(raḍiyallāhu ¢anhum) are the leaders of the people of spiritual states. In
addition, a number of hadiths have been narrated regarding Abu Bakr,
Umar, and Bilal seeing something similar to the vision of ¢Abdullāh
ibn Zayd. Furthermore, both Imam al-Ḥaramayn, in al-Nihayah, and
al-Ghazālī, in al-Basīṭ, mentioned more than ten Companions, all of
whom had similar visions. In the hadith in which the Angel called the
adhān, it was also heard by Umar, Bilal, and Jibrīl. This was narrated by
al-Ḥarith ibn Abī Usāmah in his Musnad. This is also similar to what Ibn
¢Asākir narrated in his Tārīkh, that Muḥammad ibn al-Munkadir said:
The Messenger of Allah s entered upon Abu Bakr and saw

him very ill. So, he left and entered upon ¢Ā’ishah to inform
her of Abu Bakr’s plight. At that moment, Abu Bakr sought
permission and entered. The Prophet s was amazed at the
swiftness with which Allah returned his wellbeing. So, he said,
‘No sooner than you left, I dozed off. Jibrīl (‘alayhi al-salām)
came and looked intensely at me. Then I got up having been
alleviated.’
Perhaps that was a spiritual state and not drowsy sleep.
29
About the Imam Ghazali Institute
Without a doubt, the Islamic tradition is a deep and vast ocean of jewels.
As Muslims living in the West, we have found ourselves often playing
an important role in recent times: to preserve and protect our inherit-
ed tradition while firmly establishing it for generations to come. The
uniqueness of the Islamic tradition is one where each successive gener-
ation of scholars has received their knowledge from a verifiable chain
of transmission. This has bestowed Muslims in every generation with
the ability to trace the source. The Imam Ghazali Institute has been
conducting Islamic education intensives of varying lengths since 2007
with the goal of reviving love and attachment to the traditional sciences
of sacred knowledge.
The IGI Enrichment series aims to introduce English-speaking stu-
dents around the globe to oft-neglected topics of unique interest. It is
our hope that a student will go beyond a simple read of the text and seek
out a teacher with whom they can study it with, inshaAllah.
For more information about the Imam Ghazali Institute, please visit
www.imamghazali.org
31
not es
not es

Tanwir Al-Halak v1.3 (FINAL)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Tanwir Al-Halak v1.3 (FINAL)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Tanwir Al-Halak v1.3 (FINAL)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Sold to Saif Khan (#MRIID1IW)

Sold to Saif Khan (#MRIID1IW)

sh eddi n g light on the p os sibil it y

Shedding Light on the Possibility

Tanwīr al-Ḥalak fī Imkān Ru’yah al-Nabī wa

by Imam Jalāl al-Dīn al-Suyū‎ṭī

© 2020 Imam Ghazali Publishing, USA

Title: Shedding Light on the Possibility of Seeing Prophets and Angels

Author: Imam Jalāl al-Dīn al-Suyūṭī

Proofreader & Editor: ◆ wordsmiths.org.uk ◆ info@wordsmiths.org.uk

Please consider supporting us via Patreon membership. Your patronage helps

Shedding Light on the Possibility

About the Imam Ghazali Institute

In the pursuit of knowledge, al-Suyūṭī travelled to Damascus, the

‘Whoever says: “I am knowledgeable” he is ignorant’ entitled A¢dhab

A reconciling factor is that the hadith of Ibn Abī Sulaym applies to

The root of every disobedience, forgetfulness, and desire is

Imam al-Sha¢rānī in al-¢Uhud al-Muḥammadīyya (‘The Pledges We

The Prophet stook our pledge that we should not claim to

Al-Suyūṭī’s student and biographer Shams al-Dīn al-Dāwūdī al-Mā-

His chain of transmission in taṣawwuf goes back to Sheikh ¢Abd

There is no one in our time, on the face of the earth, from

ful Narrations Concerning the Merit of the Male Head-cov-

19. Azhār al-Mutanāthira fī al-Aḥādīth al-Mutawātira <1951>

al-nahī ¢an al-munkar <1985> (‘The reality of Sunna and

44. Jany al-jinās <1986> (‘The genera of rhetoric’)

the Collection of collections on the science of philology’)

<1916> (‘The resplendent stations concerning Prophetic

(‘The goal of all practice, or the commentary on the hadith:

102. Shurūṭ al-mufassir wa ādābuh <1994> (‘The criteria to be met

114. Tanbīh al-ghabī fī takhti’a ibn ¢Arabī <1990> (‘Warning to

126. Tuḥfa al-abrār bi nukat al-adhkār li al-nawawī <1990>

138. Daqā’iq al-akhbār fī dhikr al-jannah wa al-nār <1961> (‘The

[8] Al-Suyūṭī, Ḥusn al-Muḥāḍara fī Akhbar Miṣr wa al-Qāhira (p. 157)

Shedding Light on the Possibility

Tanwīr al-Ḥalak fī Imkān Ru’yah al-Nabī wa

by Imam Jalāl al-Dīn al-Suyū‎ṭī

In the Name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful

This hadith indicates that if anyone sees him s in a dream,

His words explain that it is a general statement, not restricted to those

The meaning of the first hadith is that ¢Imrān ibn Ḥuṣayn

Al-Qurṭubī said, in is explanation of Muslim, ‘[The hadith] means

If the interdiction of cauterization had been by way of prohi-

Ibn Athīr said, in al-Nihāyah:

The description continues up to his words, ‘Until they, while awake,

Ibn al-Hājj said, in al-Madkhal, ‘Seeing the Prophet s while

Al-Bayhaqī said, in his Kitāb al-I¢tiqād, ‘After the Prophets are

The meeting of two people in wakefulness or in a dream is due

I concentrated on supplicating. It was said to me, “Don’t sup-

Sheikh ¢Abd al-Qādir al-Kaylānī said, ‘I saw the Messenger of

He (Ibn al-Mulaqqin) also said, in the biography of Sheikh Khalīfah

He would frequently see the Messenger of Allah s in both

Al-Kamāl al-Udfuwī mentioned in al-Ṭali’ al-Sa¢īd, in the biography

He lived in Akhmīm. And he is from the companions of Abū

A man said to Sheikh Abū al-¢Abbās al-Mursī, ‘O, my Master!

Sheikh Abū al-Ḥasan al-Wannani said, ‘Sheikh Abū al-¢Abbās

The author of al-Waḥīd said:

Among those who I saw in Makkah was Sheikh ¢Abdullāh

Sheikh Ṣafī al-Dīn said, in his Risālah:

Sheikh Abū al-¢Abbās al-Ḥadād said, ‘I entered upon the