2016 09 27 Principles of NPD Final 27 09 16
2016 09 27 Principles of NPD Final 27 09 16
2016 09 27 Principles of NPD Final 27 09 16
The purpose of this document is to provide introductory guidance for Brand Strategists,
Product Category Managers, and others involved in NPD and reformulation to improve the
sustainability of their products and address consumer expectations on such issues.
It outlines the differences between New Product Development and Sustainable New
Product Development and identifies where Courtauld 2025 sustainability objectives can
be integrated into the NPD process. Further guidance and support is available to
Courtauld 2025 signatories.
It presents a huge potential for organisations to increase the resilience of their value chains,
including relationships with customers. It therefore requires the inclusion of an additional set of
‘sustainability’ criteria in existing NPD stage-gate product innovation processes.
Mintel (2015) have identified a range of consumer trends which are becoming mainstream across
the UK, Europe and the globe (see section 1.1). Together, these trends represent a pull, a growing
consumer desire for food which is sensitive to environmental and social issues. A food system which
is able to articulate how products have been designed to benefit all involved in the value chain has
the potential to attract new consumers to a category and increase the Customer Lifetime Value,
aligning with business objectives.
The concept of S-NPD entails the integration of not only product but also process design with
ingredient / material selection systems and development of business models to provide products or
services to consumers. It considers approaches for integrating sustainability criteria into existing
There is no universally accepted model of New Product Development, and the structure of activity
undertaken varies between organisations. However, many models are based on the work of Booz,
Allen and Hamilton Inc. (1982), which sets out seven stages of New Product Development, and
Cooper (1990), which outlines the concept of stage gates.
Figures 1 and 2 provide an overview of the NPD process based on these two models. The difference
between NPD and S-NPD is highlighted in the green boxes. It is not in the process itself, but in the
issues which are considered at each stage. This is described further in the following sections. The
differences become fewer through the stages of the NPD process.
Idea
Consideration of how the specification can be
Generation
fulfilled and how well the options developed
meet the specification.
Idea
Screening /
Evaluation
Estimate profitability, sales volume
Business and selling price based on
Analysis benchmarking. Include distinctive
sustainability features.
Development
Test analysis and produce an initial
run to test consumer acceptance.
Beta
(Market)
Testing
Figure 1: New Product Development Process (after Booz, Allen and Hamilton Inc. 1982)
Gate Stage 3:
3 Development
As with existing NPD practices, S-NPD should deliver commercial benefits and support corporate
reputation. However, it should also go beyond this to increase brand equity through improving a
product’s sustainability credentials in line with identified consumer trends and expectations.
At the start of a conventional NPD process, a definition of “what good looks like” should be
established by the organisation. This may be described in a New Product Strategy / Requirements
Specification / Category Vision / Product Attributes or similar documentation. This should fully
capture the vision for the category and establish a set of key principles that underpin this vision.
In S-NPD, these principles should also reflect the relevant sustainability commitments from
corporate strategies, plans, goals or targets, such as:
• Corporate-level targets or goals to reduce GHG emissions, waste, energy, water or materials use;
• Corporate sustainability targets that have a link to product performance or attributes (e.g.
recyclability or recycled content of packaging; sustainable sourcing / certification requirements
for raw materials and ingredients).
In addition to the above, and in order to embed sustainability criteria in their supply chain, an
organisation should include sustainable new product design criteria in product and packaging
specifications, design briefs, policies and procurement practices.
The purpose of any business is to “grow customers”, i.e. to increase their economic value to the
organisation. This can be measured through the Customer Lifetime Value (CLTV). CLTV is an indicator
of the present value of future cash flows attributed to each customer’s purchasing pattern. It helps
to focus on long-term customer equity, rather than simply maximizing short-term sales. This enables
businesses to know how much each customer is worth and how much future cash flow will likely be
(European Commission 2014).
Research by Dixon et al (2010) indicates that delighting customers does not create much more
loyalty, but reducing their efforts does. In short, re-engineering processes in order to create an
almost effort-free customer experience is an important innovation opportunity.
S-NPD should link to these drivers, identifying how improvements to product sustainability can
deliver against these objectives. For example, Mintel (2015) have identified that the top 12 trends
for food and drink in 2016 include Eco is the new reality, Based on a True Story, From The Inside Out
and Alternatives Everywhere. These are described by Mintel as follows:
Alternatives Everywhere “Veggie burgers and non-dairy milks have escaped the realm of
serving as substitutes primarily for people with dietary concerns,
consumers with allergies and followers of vegetarian or vegan
diets – and now have broader appeal.”
Europe is a hotbed for plant-based protein innovation
Based On A True Story 42% of UK adults aged 16+ say, ‘I would expect food produced by
smaller companies to generally be more ethical.’’ Consumers
have been romanced by product origin, ingredients or inspiration
stories. With similar claims made by legitimately hand-crafted as
well as mass-produced products, this proliferation and occasional
propagation will find both consumers and regulators seeking
products with verified claims.
From The Inside Out Consumers are recognising that diets can connect with the way
they look and feel. This places new emphasis on packaged
products that are formulated to help people’s physical
appearance as well as their personal wellness, creating a market
for products enhanced with everything from collagen to
probiotics.”
Source: Mintel (2015)
Responses to these consumer demands could consider changes to product, process and business
models as part of the S-NPD process.
NOTE: other useful WRAP resources include a Raw Material Risk and Opportunities Screening Tool;
By capitalising on the three trends and embedding the recommendations from the ‘Food Futures’
report, NPD can take a business unusual approach to the challenges and become more flexible,
intelligent and transparent, ‘FIT’, to meet the 21st century demands. The primary demand will be to
feed the growing population, which is why one of the recommendations in the report is to drive
down farm-to-fork food waste.
The benchmarking process is described in figure 3. There are usually two elements to benchmarking
in NPD:
Some sustainability benchmarking information comes from the visual assessment (e.g. ingredients
lists, country of origin information, cooking and storage instructions, on-pack sustainability
communications or eco-labels); whilst some is drawn from the findings from the hotspots analysis
(e.g. information on energy, water and materials use; estimated wastage rates; etc.).
Sustainability benchmarking in the S-NPD process needs to remain fairly flexible according to the
availability of product or service-specific information or the availability of proxy data or information
for similar products and services. In hospitality and food service this may need to include
consideration of both product(s) (menus) and services / facilities. The figure below provides some
ideas for the range of sustainability benchmarks that could be used. The selection of benchmarks will
often need to be done on a case-by-case basis.
5. Conclusions
Issues of sustainability can be readily incorporated into existing NPD processes, and address not only
supply chain resilience but also consumer demand. With Courtauld 2025 signatories, WRAP will
develop a range of supporting tools and techniques as appropriate to help embed these issues into
signatories’ processes, supporting delivery of the objectives of Courtauld 2025 and wider
sustainability issues.
Changes in Packaging
Functional packaging - vacuum packed meat with an extended
shelf life and enhanced quality. Other options include
controlled permeability, oxygen scavenging and antimicrobial
nanoparticles.
Shopping Experience
Danish supermarket Bilka introduced changes to the layouts
that meant that consumers were nudged to buy healthier. This
led to increases in customer satisfaction rates as measured by
the supermarket, hypothesised as a consequence of enabling
the customers to follow their ambitions, which created a
better shopping experience. Measured against an original
baseline, the experiment utilizing availability and the right
information at the right time brought about an average sales
increase of 83% for vegetables and an increase of 100% for
healthy snacks
Catering / Hospitality
Sodexo are piloting a set of 10 sustainable meals. The project
is part of Sodexo’s partnership with WWF on LiveWell, which
aims to encourage businesses and policy-makers to facilitate
the adoption of diets which are both healthy and sustainable.
Booz, Allen and Hamilton, Inc. (1982) New Product Management for the 1980’s. New York: Booz
Allen and Hamilton, Inc., 1982.
Cooper, R. (1990) Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products; Business Horizons 33
(3): 44–55. doi:10.1016/0007-6813(90)90040-i.
Dixon, M., Freeman, K., and Toman, N.(2010) Stop Trying To Delight Your Customers, Harvard
Business Review July –August 2010 https://hbr.org/2010/07/stop-trying-to-delight-your-customers