Human Anatomy
Human Anatomy
Human Anatomy
Medical faculty,
Department of Normal and Pathological Clinical Anatomy
E-mail sonshine22@ukr.net
1. Nescoromna Natalia – anatomy hall N 2
Teacher's
workplace 3. Matiushenko Phylyp – study room N 3
4. Kuznyetsova Elena – study room N 1
5. Chebotarova Svetlana - anatomy hall N 2
6. Antonova Natalya - anatomy hall N 1
7. Kozhukharenko Tatiana - study room N 1
8. Ursu Alexandr - anatomy hall N 1
9. Ostapenko Andrey - anatomy hall N 2
10. Prus Ruslan - study room N 2
11. Kozachenko Anastasia study room N 2
COURSE DESCRIPTION
Forms and methods of teaching:
The course will be presented in the form of lectures, practical classes and
organization of students' independent work.
Basic literature
Informational recourses
http://anatom.in.ua
https://anatom.ua/
https://meduniver.com/Medical/Anatom/
https://www.primalpictures.com/
https://www.visiblebody.com/
https://3d4medical.com/
Evaluation criteria
Various forms of knowledge control are used (oral, written, combined, testing,
practical skills, etc.).
The results of the academic progress of students are put in the form of grades
on a national scale, 200-point and ECTS scale and have standardized generalized
criteria for assessing knowledge:
1. National scale:
- grade "excellent" (5) is awarded to a student who systematically worked during the
semester, showed during the exam versatile and deep knowledge of the program
material, is able to successfully perform the tasks provided by the program, has
mastered the content of basic and additional literature, has realized the relationship of
individual sections of the discipline, their importance for the future profession, found
creative abilities in understanding and using the educational and program material,
has shown the ability to independently update and replenish knowledge. The level of
competence is high (creative);
- a "good" grade (4) is given to a student who found full knowledge of the curriculum
material, successfully completes the assignments included in the program, has
absorbed the basic literature recommended by the program, has sufficient knowledge
of the discipline and is able to independently update and refresh them during further
study and professional activities; the competence level is sufficient (constructively-
variant);
- the grade of "unsatisfactory" (2) is given to the student who did not reveal sufficient
knowledge of the basic curriculum material, made fundamental mistakes in the
performance of the tasks provided by the program, cannot use the knowledge without
the help of the teacher to further study, could not master the skills of independent
work; the competence level is low (receptive - productive).
- The mark "passed" is given to a student who has fulfilled the curriculum of the
discipline, has no academic arrears; the level of competence is high (creative)
- The grade "failed" is given to a student who didn't follow the study plan of the
discipline, has academic debts (grade point average is less than 3.0 and / or absences)
level of competence - low (receptive - productive).
3. The ECTS rating scale evaluates the achievements of students in the discipline,
who are studying in the same course in the same major, according to the points they
received, by ranking, namely: ECTS Statistical Score "A" top 10% of students, "B"
next 25% of students, "C" next 30% of students, "D" next 25% of students, "E" last
10% of students. The ECTS scale establishes whether a student belongs to the group
of the best or the worst among the reference group of fellow students (department,
specialty) is his/her rating. When converting from a multi-point scale, as a rule, the
boundaries of grades "A", "B", "C", "D", "E" do not coincide with the boundaries of
grades "5", "4", "3" on the traditional scale. An "A" grade on the ECTS scale cannot
equal an "excellent" grade and a "B" grade cannot equal a "good" grade. Students
who receive grades of "FX" and "F" ("2") are not entered into the list of students
ranked. Such students automatically receive a grade of "E" after retake. A grade of
"FX" is assigned to students who have earned the minimum number of points for
current academic activities, but who are not given credit for the final control. The
grade of "F" is given to students who attended all classroom sessions in the
discipline, but did not get an average score (3.00) for the current academic activities
and are not allowed to the final control.
1. Current progress:
At the last practical lesson, the teacher is to announce to students the results of their
current academic grades, academic debt (if any). Only those students who have no
academic debts and have an average grade of at least 3.00 for the current academic
activities are allowed to take part in the final attestation.
To grade a discipline on a 4-point traditional (national) scale, the average score for
the discipline is calculated as the arithmetic mean of two components:
1) the current grade point average as the arithmetic average of all current grades
(calculated as a number rounded to 2 decimal places)
The results of the exams are evaluated on a 4-point national scale ("excellent",
"good", "satisfactory", "unsatisfactory") and a 200-point scale, and are entered on the
examination record and the student's record book.
Example:
- Current grade point average is 4.75
- Examination grade - 4
- average grade for the discipline - (4.75 + 4): 2 = 4.38
- traditional grade for the discipline – 4
The conversion of the traditional grade for the discipline into a 200-point grade is
performed by the University Information and Computing Center with the
"Contingent". Converting the result of the student's study of the discipline on a 200-
point scale and further ranking on a rating scale (ECTS) is necessary to implement
the academic mobility of students. This allows the student to continue his or her
studies in that discipline at another institution or in another country.
170 to 200 - Excellent (A) (excellent performance with only minor errors)
155 to 169 - Very good (B) (above average with few errors)
140 to 154 - Good (C) (generally satisfactory, with some significant errors)
125 to 139 - Satisfactory (D) (not bad, but with some significant deficiencies)
111 (min) to 124 - Sufficient (E) (performance satisfies the minimum criteria)
60 to 110 - Satisfactory (D) (not bad, but with some significant deficiencies)
1 to59 - Unsatisfactory (F) (with obligatory repeat course of the discipline)