Ojsadmin, 71
Ojsadmin, 71
Ojsadmin, 71
37506/v11/i1/2020/ijphrd/193845
& Development, January 2020, Vol. 11, No. 01 363
Abstract
Introduction: Regenerative Endodontics is a fast growing field in dentistry showing highly favourable
clinical outcomes. It encompasses various procedures that serve as a better alternative to traditional root
canal therapy as well as more aggressive treatments such as surgical endodontics. The knowledge and skill
of the practitioner plays a pivotal role in the success of any regenerative procedure.
Aim: The purpose of this survey is to evaluate knowledge, attitudes and practice of regenerative endodontics
among the dental Interns, dental postgraduates and dental practitioners in mangaluru.
Materials and Method: An online questionnaire comprising of 20 questions was distributed amongst the
dental professionals of Manguluru. A total of 448 dental professionals responded over a period of 1 month.
Their responses were collected and tabulated to interpret the data and obtain the results.
Results: A total of 448 replies were received, with the majority of the correspondents belonging to the
dental post graduates (41.5%). The majority (97%) of the participants of this survey had come across the
term ‘Regenerative Endodontics’, but only 41 out of the 448 had reported performing any regenerative
endodontic procedure.
Conclusion: Regenerative endodontic Procedures have shown favourable results in various studies. It can
be used as a valuable tool for any dental professional. But, as seen in this study, the knowledge levels as well
as attitudes amongst the dental fraternity needs to improve so as to allow the incorporation of regenerative
endodontics into clinical practice.
Table 1: Questions drafted so as to determine the knowledge levels of the various participants in the field of
regenerative endodontics
Response
Question
Yes No Not Sure
Do you think Regenerative procedures can serve as a practical and
292(65.2%) 66(14.7%) 90(20.1%)
feasible replacement for more aggressive treatment protocols?
Do you think regenerative procedures can serve as an alternative to
128(28.6%) 186(41.5%) 134(29.9%)
implants?
Single visit procedure is recommended for regenerative endodontic
26(5.8%) 338(75.4%) 84(18.8%)
treatment.
Leaching of Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl) into the periapical space has
289(64.5%) 42(9.4%) 117(26.1%)
a detrimental effect on revascularisation procedures.
The use of Ethylene-Diamine-Tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) is
recommended along with Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl) during 161(35.9%) 108(24.1%) 179(40%)
revitalisation procedures.
Revascularisation procedures performed on teeth with a large apical
foramen diameter are more successful than teeth with a small apical 172(38.4%) 102(22.8%) 174(38.8%)
foramen.
Should revascularisation be performed on deciduous teeth? 30(6.7%) 288(64.3%) 130(29%)
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, January 2020, Vol. 11, No. 01 365
Table 2: The technical aspects of regenerative procedures was inquired with these following questions.
Table 3: The scope and future aspects of REP’s, according to the participants, was Questioned.
Disinfection of the root canal space is paramount 227(50.7%) of the correspondents believed that the
towards the success of any Regenerative procedure. higher cost factor for regenerative procedures would be
Both irrigants as well as intra canal medicaments can its biggest obstacle.In a similar survey conducted by
be used.[8] The most recognised irrigant in the survey Utneja et al (2012), 74% of the participants believed that
was sodium hypochlorite and the most recognised intra the higher cost factor would be the biggest obstacle to
canal medicament was the triple antibiotic paste (TAP). regenerative procedures. [15]
Although TAP has been shown to be more effective
in eradicating bacteria,[9] it has the potential for tooth For those believing that complicated procedures
disco-loration, which results from contact between are the biggest obstacle for regenerative endodontics,
minocycline and the root canal walls during the REP.[10] the majority belonged to the practicing dentists (40%),
Exclusion of minocycline (known as double antibiotic which may indicate a lack of trust in such procedures by
paste) or substitution of minocycline by amoxicillin, practitioners.
doxycycline, clindamycin, tetracycline or cefaclor has
been reported to solve this problem.[11]
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, January 2020, Vol. 11, No. 01 367