Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    10.7 - VT - Writing Advanced 28-07-2023-09-29-57

    Uploaded by

    nhatdz2403

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    10.7 - VT - Writing Advanced 28-07-2023-09-29-57

    Uploaded by

    nhatdz2403
    6 views1 page

    Original Title

    10.7 - VT - WRITING ADVANCED 28-07-2023-09-29-57 (1)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    6 views1 page

    10.7 - VT - Writing Advanced 28-07-2023-09-29-57

    Uploaded by

    nhatdz2403

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    There is a growing concern that human activities are causing severe damage to the environment,

    leading to serious issues like climate change, habitat destruction (elimination), and species
    extinction Some people believe that strict regulations and heavy penalties should be imposed on
    individuals and companies responsible for causing environmental harm. Others think that
    education and raising awareness is better. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

    The escalating environmental crisis, manifested in phenomena like climate change, habitat loss,
    and species extinction, has necessitated urgent action. While some advocate for strict regulations
    and severe penalties for environmental offenders, others propose education and awareness as
    more effective solutions. Both perspectives offer valid remedies and warrant detailed discussion.

    In the first viewpoint, proponents argue that implementing stringent regulations and imposing
    heavy penalties can act as a powerful deterrent against environmentally destructive practices.
    They posit that, without punitive measures, many individuals and corporations may not feel
    compelled to alter their behaviour, choosing profit or convenience over environmental
    responsibility. By enforcing severe consequences for environmental harm, societies can ensure
    adherence to sustainable practices and make environmental conservation a legal obligation. This
    approach can be particularly effective in regulating large corporations, whose industrial activities
    often contribute significantly to environmental degradation.

    Contrastingly, others believe that education and awareness are more effective, long-term
    solutions to environmental issues. This perspective emphasises the importance of instilling a
    deep understanding and appreciation of the environment in individuals from a young age.
    Through comprehensive environmental education, people can understand the impact of their
    actions on the environment and be motivated to adopt sustainable practices. Moreover, raising
    public awareness about environmental issues can foster a culture of environmental responsibility
    and influence societal norms, making environmental conservation a shared value rather than
    merely a legal requirement.

    In conclusion, while both strict regulations with penalties and education have their merits, I
    believe that an integrated approach combining these strategies would be most effective. Strict
    regulations can provide an immediate deterrent against environmental harm, while education can
    foster a culture of long-term environmental stewardship. By employing both strategies, society
    can address the urgency of the current environmental crisis and lay the foundation for enduring
    environmental conservation.

    You might also like