Full Download PDF of (Ebook PDF) Research Methods in Psychology 6th Edition All Chapter
Full Download PDF of (Ebook PDF) Research Methods in Psychology 6th Edition All Chapter
Full Download PDF of (Ebook PDF) Research Methods in Psychology 6th Edition All Chapter
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-research-methods-in-
psychology-5th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-research-in-psychology-
methods-and-design-8th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-research-methods-and-
statistics-in-psychology-3rd-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-research-methods-in-
psychology-investigating-human-behavior-3rd-edition/
(eBook PDF) Introduction to Qualitative Research
Methods in Psychology 4th Edition
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-introduction-to-
qualitative-research-methods-in-psychology-4th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-psychology-research-
methods-1st-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-research-methods-in-
psychology-from-theory-to-practice-canadian-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/original-pdf-research-methods-in-
psychology-evaluating-a-world-of-information-3rd-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-research-methods-in-
psychology-evaluating-a-world-of-information-second-edition/
Research Methods
in Psychology
Dennis Howitt & Duncan Cramer
Sixth Edition
Contents
16 Reliability and validity: Evaluating the value of tests and measures 330
Overview 330
16.1 Introduction 331
16.2 Reliability of measures 332
16.3 Validity 336
16.4 Types of validity 336
16.5 Conclusion 345
Key points 345
Activity 346
xii CONTENTS
Glossary 536
References 543
Index 555
Companion Website ON THE
WEBSITE
For open-access student resources specifically written
to complement this textbook and support your learning,
please visit go.pearson.com/uk/he/resources
Guided tour
4 PART 1 BASICS OF RESEARCH
Role of research in
fascinating, but this is not enough. Although initially psychology provides many intrigu-
ing ideas about the nature of people and society, as one matures intellectually, the chal-
lenges and complexities of the research processes which stimulated these ideas increasingly
become part of one’s understanding of psychology. There are many engaging psycho-
psychology
logical issues: for example, why do some relationships last? Is there a purpose behind
dreaming? What causes depression and what can we do to alleviate it? Can we improve
our memory to make us study more efficiently and, if so, how? Why are we aggressive
and can we do anything to make us less so? What are the rules which govern everyday
conversation? Psychology’s subject matter is enormously diverse which ensures that our
individual interests are well catered for. Research methods themselves reflect this diversity.
Psychology comes in many forms and so does good psychological research.
Students often see research methods as a dull, dry and difficult topic largely tolerated
rather than enjoyed. They much prefer other modules on exciting topics such as child devel-
opment, mental illness, forensic investigation, brain structure and thought. They overlook
that these exciting ideas are the work of committed researchers. For these psychologists,
psychology and research methods are intertwined – psychology and the means of devel-
oping psychological ideas through research cannot be differentiated. For instance, it is
Overview stimulating to learn that we are attracted to people who have the same or similar attitudes
to ourselves. The sort of research which supports this idea should also be of interest. This
is a start but additional issues will spring to many of our minds about this. For example,
● Research is central to all the activities of psychologists as it is to modern life in general. why should we be attracted to people who have similar attitudes to our own? Do opposites
A key assumption of psychology is that the considered and careful collection of research never attract? When does similarity lead to attraction and when does dissimilarity lead to
data is an essential part of the development of the discipline. attraction? The answer may have already been found to such questions. If not, the need for
● Most psychology involves the integration of theoretical notions with the outcomes of research is obvious. Research makes us think hard – which is the purpose of any academic
research. Psychology characteristically emphasises causal explanations. Many psychologists discipline. The more thinking that we do about research, the better we become at it.
adhere to the belief that a prime purpose of research is to test causal propositions, though Box 1.1 gives explanations of basic concepts such as ‘variable’ and ‘correlation’ which
this is far from universal. you may be unfamiliar with.
Practical Advice
CHAPTER 5 RESEARCH REPORTS 95
it is not a substitute for eventually reading that article. A badly written abstract may deter
some researchers from reading the original research report and may cause others to waste
effort obtaining a report which is not quite what they expected it to be.
Since the abstract provides a summary of the entire paper, having read the abstract,
the reader will know what to expect in the report and this speeds up and simplifies the
task of reading. First impressions are important, so writing the abstract should not be
xviii GUIDED TOUR
■ Appendix or appendices ● A good rule-of-thumb is to give the results of calculations to two decimal places or
less, as the APA recommends. Avoid spuriously implying a greater degree of accuracy
Appendices are a rarity because they are space-consuming. Appendices do help to avoid than psychological data usually possess. Whatever you do, be consistent. You need to
cluttering up the main body of the report with overlong detail that might confuse the understand how to round to two decimals. Basically, if the original number ends with
reader and hamper good presentation. So, for example, it may be perfectly sensible to a figure of 5 or above then we round up, otherwise we round down. So 21.4551 gives
include your 50-item questionnaire in your report, but common sense may dictate that 21.46 rounded, whereas 21.4549 gives 21.45 rounded. If whatever you have calculated
it is put at the very end of the report in the section for appendices. In this case, it would can have a value of above one, then any calculation less than one should be written as
be usual to give indicative examples of questions under ‘Materials’ and refer the reader 0.45, etc. If what you have calculated cannot have a value of greater than 1, then omit
to the appendix. Similarly, the multitude of tables that the statistical analysis may gener- the figure before the decimal point. A correlation coefficient would be written as .32
ate may fit uncomfortably in the results section but have a more suitable location in an because its maximum value is 1.0.
appendix. Remember the following: ● Psychological terms may not have a standard definition that is accepted by all research-
● Refer to the relevant appendix in the main text where appropriate. ers. Consequently, you may find it necessary to define how you are using terms in your
report. Always remember that definitions in psychology are rarely definitive and they
● Number and title the appendices appropriately in order to facilitate their location. are often problematic in themselves.
● You may be evaluated partly on the basis of the contents of your appendices. It is inap- ● Regarding layout, normally the recommendation is to double-space your work and
propriate simply to place a load of junk material there. word-process it. According to the APA, 12-point Times New Roman is preferable.
However, check local requirements on these matters. Leave wide margins for com-
ments. The underlying assumption behind this is that the report is being reviewed by
another person. A report that will not be commented upon might not require double
spacing. Check the local rules where you are studying.
Box 5.8 Research Example
2.7 Conclusion ● The variable thought to be the cause may be called the independent variable and the variable presumed to
be the effect the dependent variable. Some researchers feel that these two terms should be restricted to
the variables in a true experiment. In non-experiments, the variable assumed to be the cause may be called
It is almost a truism to suggest that the aims and hypotheses of research should be clear. the predictor and the variable considered to be the effect the criterion.
This may seem difficult early on and perseverance is needed. Since research is one way by
which psychological knowledge and ideas develop, it is almost inevitable that aims and
hypotheses go through a process of refinement. Reformulation of one’s aims and objec-
tives commonly occurs in the research planning stage, and sometimes after. All research is
guided by aims, but hypotheses are only universal in certain types of research – especially
true experiments – where it is possible to specify likely outcomes fairly precisely. Hypoth-
eses are best included wherever possible, since they represent the distillation of the ACTIVITIES
researcher’s thoughts about the subject matter. Sometimes, for non-experimental studies,
the formulation of hypotheses becomes too cumbersome to be of value. Hence, many 1. Choose a recent study that has been referred to either in research you are reading or in a lecture that you have attended.
excellent studies in psychology will not include hypotheses. What kind of aim or aims did the study have in terms of the aims mentioned in this chapter? What were the specific aims
The true experiment (e.g. the laboratory experiment) has many advantages in terms of of this study? What kinds of variables were manipulated or measured? If the study involved testing hypotheses, were
the testing of hypotheses: (a) its ability to randomise participants to conditions, (b) the the direction and the causal nature of the relationship specified? If the hypothesis was stated in a causal form, was the
requirement of manipulating the independent variable rather than using already existing design a true (i.e. randomised) one?
variables such as gender, and (c) the control over variables. Although we have largely 2. You wish to test the hypothesis that we are what we eat. How could you do this? What variables could you measure?
discussed the testing of a single hypothesis at a time, very little research is so restricted.
Most research studies have several aims and several hypotheses, because we are usually
interested how several different variables may be related to one another. Economies of
time and effort result by considering several hypotheses in one study.
The penultimate section of this book on qualitative research methods shows how
valuable research can proceed using a quite different approach in which the idea of speci-
fied aims and hypotheses is something of an anathema. Nevertheless, much research in
mainstream psychology either overtly or tacitly subscribes to hypothesis testing as an
ideal. Later (Chapter 18) we present an overview of the theoretical basis to these different
approaches to research.
Key points
● Research studies have different general aims. Most seem to be concerned with testing causal propositions or
hypotheses. Others may describe a phenomenon or intervention in detail, estimate how common a behaviour
is in some population, evaluate the effects of interventions, or statistically summarise the results of similar
studies. The aim or aims of a study should be clearly and accurately stated.
● Studies which test causal propositions should describe clearly and accurately what these propositions are.
● The research study should make a contribution to the topic. While research usually builds on previous research
in an area, the contribution of the study should be original to some extent in the sense that the particular
question addressed has not been entirely investigated in this way before.
● A hypothesis describes what the relationship is expected to be between two or more variables. The hypothesis
should be stated in a causal form when the study is a true experiment. It should be stated in a non-causal
form when the study is a non-experiment.
● When suggesting that variables may be related to one another, we usually expect the variables to be related in
a particular way or direction. When this is the case, we should specify in the hypothesis what this direction is.
➔
Modern psychological research can seem daunting to the newcomer. This sixth edition
of Research Methods in Psychology seeks to introduce a broad range of topics dealing
with psychological research and analysis as currently practised. We cover statistical meth-
ods in psychology in a separate volume. Good research requires considerable thought,
understanding, experience, and attention to detail. It is far from a simple rule-following
exercise and to pretend otherwise is a great disservice to students. The incredible progress
of modern psychology requires that teaching resources must struggle to be up to date
and be appropriate for the variety of different educational experiences provided by dif-
ferent universities. We do not expect that this sixth edition will be read from beginning
to end. Instead, choose what is appropriate for your needs from our sequence of largely
self-contained chapters.
In Research Methods in Psychology you will find both quantitative and qualitative
research covered in appropriate depth. These are commonly but, we think, wrongly seen
as alternative and incompatible approaches to psychological research. For some research-
ers, there may be an intellectual incompatibility between the two. Increasingly, however,
researchers appreciate that the two approaches can feed each other. Even if we are wrong
about this, it is vitally important that students understand the intellectual roots of the
two traditions, how research is carried out in these traditions, and what each tradition
is capable of achieving. Armed with this understanding, students will be better placed
to make intelligent and appropriate choices about the style of research appropriate to
their chosen research questions. On its own, the qualitative material in this sixth edition
effectively supports much of the qualitative research likely to be carried out today. There
is as much detailed practical advice and theory on qualitative research methods as prob-
ably required. (If more is required, the book by Dennis Howitt (2019), Introduction to
Qualitative Research Methods in Psychology, Harlow: Pearson Education, will probably
meet your requirements.) But this is in addition to the quantitative coverage, which easily
outstrips any competition in terms of variety, depth and authority. We have tried to pro-
vide students with resources to help them in ways largely ignored by most other texts. For
example, Chapter 7 on literature searches is extremely comprehensive and practical. Simi-
larly, Chapter 8 on ethics meets the most recent standards and deals with them in depth.
Chapter 5 on writing research reports places report writing at the centre of the research
process rather than as an add-on at the end. Writing a research report is highly demanding
of a student’s understanding of all of the elements of research. We provide practical help
to this end by including chapters giving examples of quantitative and qualitative research
which fail to meet the highest standards. You will also find some discussion of statistics in
this book. For the most part, this is when dealing with topics which are missing from the
popular SPSS-based statistics textbooks, simply because SPSS does not cover everything
useful in psychological research. Statistics is a more controversial topic in psychology
than struggling students may realise. So we have included a chapter on some of the more
controversial aspects of statistics which may encourage a more mature understanding of
the role of statistics in psychology. For the sixth edition, we have included new material
xx INTRODUCTION
on important but recent topics including multi-method research and data mining. The
final chapter is new and is tips and hints which may help you cope better with the stresses
and turmoil that planning and executing research may bring.
As far as is possible, we have tried to provide students with practical skills as well as
the necessary conceptual overview of research methods in modern psychology. Neverthe-
less, there is a limit to this. The bottom line is that anyone wishing to understand research
needs to read research, not merely plan, execute, analyse and write up research. Hence,
almost from the start we emphasise that reading is not merely unavoidable but crucial.
Without such additional reading, the point of this book is missed. It is not intended as a
jumble of technical stuff too boring to be part of any module other than one on research
methods. The material in the book is intended to expand students’ understanding of psy-
chology by explaining just how researchers go about creating psychology. At times this
can be quite exciting as well as frustrating and demanding.
Acknowledgements
■ Authors’ acknowledgements
Working with the team at Pearson on a book project is always a delight. Working without
the team at Pearson on a book project is unimaginable. So we would like to offer our
thanks to everyone involved for their kindness and hard work. But there are a few people
that we would like to give a particular mention.
We have worked with Janey Webb for a good many years on numerous book projects.
No matter what, she always gave 110% but, sadly, she has moved on from Pearson. It is
difficult to describe the incredible support that she provided over all that time. Her official
title was Publisher but she was just Janey to us. She is a remarkable person who will be
missed. Partings of this sort are common in publishing but we also have said goodbye
to Saraswati Banerjee who was Acquisition Editor for a while. She was also a rock and
great support. We wish them both well wherever life leads them. This means that we can
welcome Catherine Yates as the Publisher who has taken over from Janey.
We hope that you can tell a book by its cover as we think that the cover design, by
Kelly Miller, is excellent and we wish her success after her departure from Pearson. Kevin
Ancient took charge of the cover after this and did the all-important text design. He easily
holds the record for the number of acknowledgements in our books.
The Project Manager is Sweda R who is just about the most helpful person imaginable.
Unfortunately we never know whether to address her as Sweda or R. Maybe R sounds a
bit too James Bondish. Perhaps all of us should be a letter.
Bincy Menon had overall responsibility for turning our manuscript into a fine looking
book in her role as Content Producer. It never ceases to amaze us that a human being can
oversee such a process yet remain charming and friendly.
The Copyeditor was Antonia Maxwell. Not only is she better at spotting our mistakes
than even we are at making them, she imposed the text design on our manuscript with
great aplomb. This cannot be easy for a book like this with its many elements. Even more
remarkable is her ability not to appear irritated by the authors when surely she must have
been.
Heather Ancient was the Proofreader for this edition. Proofreader is a word used to
describe a very wise, very clever, very organized person with extremely high tolerance of
boredom. Such qualities are not possible in just one human being which confirms our
view that all proof readers are androids.
Finally, we should express our gratitude to Karen Mclaren who is the rhyming R&P
Analyst at Pearson. R&P stands for Rights and Permissions. She stops us getting in big
trouble with copyright holders. This makes us happy though sorting things out does not.
Dennis Howitt
Duncan Cramer
xxii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
■ Publisher’s acknowledgements
Text credits:
38 W. W. Norton & Company: Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal con-
structs. Volume 1: A theory of personality. New York, NY: Norton; 41 American Psycho-
logical Association: Byrne, D., & Blaylock, B. (1963). Similarity and assumed similarity
of attitudes between husbands and wives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,
67, 636–640; 48 American Psychological Association: Danziger, K., & Dzinas, K. (1997).
How psychology got its variables. Canadian Psychology, 38, 43–48; 59–60 American
Psychological Association: Condon, J. W., & Crano, W. D. (1988). Inferred evaluation
and the relation between attitude similarity and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Per-
sonality and Social Psychology, 54, 789–797; 82 Sage Publications: Byrne, D., Gouaux,
C., Griffitt, W., Lamberth, J., Murakawa, N., Prasad, M., Prasad, A., & Ramirez III, M.
(1971). The ubiquitous relationship: Attitude similarity and attraction: A cross-cultural
study. Human Relations, 24, 201–207; 110 American Psychological Association: Dick-
son, J. M., Moberly, N. J., & Kinderman, P. (2011). Depressed people are not less moti-
vated by personal goals but are more pessimistic about attaining them. Journal of
Abnormal Psychology, 120, 975–980; 116 Elsevier: Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974).
Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between lan-
guage and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 13, 585–589; 118
American Psychological Association: Pickering, M. (1984). Elizabeth Loftus: An Appre-
ciation. Genuflecting Psychology Review, 29, 29–43; 163–164 The British Psychological
Society: British Psychological Society (2011). Code of human research ethics. Leicester,
UK: BPS. p. 5; 171 State University of New York Press: Korn, J. H. (1997). Illusions of
reality: A history of deception in social psychology. New York, NY: State University of
New York Press; 180 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Keith-Spiegel, P., & Koocher, G. P.
(1985). Ethics in psychology: Professional standards and cases. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates. p. 35; 181 Harper & Row: Steffens, L. (1931). Autobiography of
Lincoln Steffens. New York, NY: Harper & Row. p. 151; 235 Houghton Mifflin Com-
pany: Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental
designs for research. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. p. 1; 236 Houghton Mifflin Com-
pany: Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasiexperimentation: Design and analy-
sis issues for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. p. 295; 244 Taylor & Francis
Group: Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design and analysis: An
integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 44–45; 246 Elsevier:
Eagle, B. W., Miles, E. W., & Icenogle, M. L. (1997). Interrole conflicts and the permeabil-
ity of work and family domains: Are there gender differences? Journal of Vocational Behav-
ior, 50, 168–184; 251 Houghton Mifflin Company: Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979).
Quasiexperimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand
McNally; 255 American Psychological Association: Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986).
The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Concep-
tual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
51, 1173–1182; 261 Sage Publications: Fincham, F. D., Beach, S. R. H., Harold, G.
T., & Osborne, L. N. (1997). Marital satisfaction and depression: Different causal rela-
tionships for men and women? Psychological Science, 8, 351–357; 271 Houghton Mifflin
Company: Hays, W. L. (1994). Statistics (5th ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace. p. 227;
271 Pearson Education: Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D. (1984). Statistical methods in
education and psychology (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
p. 177; 271 Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland: Fisher, R. A.
(1936b). “The coefficient of racial likeness” and the future of craniometry. Journal of the
Royal Anthropological Institute, 66, 57–63. Retrieved February 6, 2016 from https://
digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/handle/2440/15228; 274 Office for National
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xxiii
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative
Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101; 420 Sage Publications: Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded
theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. E. Lincoln (Eds.),
Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) (pp. 503–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage;
424–426 Sage Publications: Charmaz, K. (1995). Grounded theory. In J. A. Smith, R.
Harré, & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 27–49).
London, UK: Sage; 427 Sage Publications: Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1999). Grounded
theory methodology: An overview. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Qualitative
research, Vol. 3 (pp. 73–93). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 430 Maggie O’Neil: We are
grateful to Maggie O’Neil and Jane Pitcher for help with this box; 431 Elsevier: Potter, J.
(1998). Qualitative and discourse analysis. In A. S. Bellack & M. Hersen (Eds.), Compre-
hensive clinical psychology, Vol. 3 (pp. 117–144). Oxford, UK: Pergamon; 432 Taylor &
Francis: Groom, R., Cushion, C., & Nelson, L. (2011). Delivery of video-based perfor-
mance analysis by England youth soccer coaches: Towards a grounded theory. Journal of
Applied Sport Psychology, 23, 16–23; 434 Sage Publications: Strauss, A., & Corbin, J.
(1999). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess
(Eds.), Qualitative research, Vol. 3 (pp. 73–93). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 437 Linguis-
tic Society of America: Tannen, D. (2007). Discourse analysis. Linguistic Society of Amer-
ica, http://www.lsadc.org/info/ling-fields-discourse.cfm; 438 Harvard University Press:
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press; 438 Sage Publications: Edley, N. (2001). Analysing masculinity: Interpretative
repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S.
J. E. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 189–228). London, UK:
Sage; 438 Sage Publications: Potter, J. (2004). Discourse analysis. In M. Hardy & A.
Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 607–624). London, UK: Sage; 438 Sage
Publications: Taylor, S. (2001). Locating and conducting discourse analytic research. In
M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. E. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis
(pp. 5–48). London, UK: Sage; 439 Cambridge University Press: Searle, J. R. (1969).
Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer-
sity Press; 441 Sage Publications: Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1995). Discourse analysis.
In J. A. Smith, R. Harré, & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology
(pp. 80–92). London, UK: Sage; 441 Sage Publications: van Dijk, T. (2001). Principles of
critical discourse analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. E. Yates (Eds.), Discourse
theory and practice: A reader (pp. 300–317). London, UK: Sage; 442–443 Sage Publica-
tions: Potter, J. (2004). Discourse analysis. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook
of data analysis (pp. 607–624). London, UK: Sage; 443 Sage Publications: Potter, J.
(1997). Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occurring talk. In D. Silverman
(Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, methods and practice (pp. 144–160). London, UK:
Sage; 446 Sage Publications: Taylor, S. (2001). Locating and conducting discourse analytic
research. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. E. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide
for analysis (pp. 5–48). London, UK: Sage; 445 Sage Publications: Lovering, K. M. (1995).
The bleeding body: Adolescents talk about menstruation. In S. Wilkinson & C. Kitzinger
(Eds.), Feminism and discourse: Psychological perspectives (pp. 10–31). London: Sage;
456 Sage Publications: Wooffitt, R. (2001). Researching psychic practitioners: Conversa-
tion analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. E. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide
for analysis (pp. 49–92). London: Sage; 457–458 Sage Publications: Kitzinger, C., & Frith,
H. (2001). Just say no? The use of conversation analysis in developing a feminist perspec-
tive on sexual refusal. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. E. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory
and practice: A reader (pp. 167–185). London, UK: Sage; 465 Sage Publications: Smith,
J. A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith
(Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 51–80). London,
UK: Sage; 467 Sage Publications: Robbins, B. D., & Parlavecchio, H. (2006). The unwanted
exposure of the self: A phenomenological study of embarrassment. The Humanistic
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
absolutely refused to lend the book to Betty, who had taken
it without leave.
"I don't think I would tell any more tales if I were you.
You would not be likely to gain much credit just now. I came
to make friends with you."
We did so, and then the dear maid repeated the thirty-
second Psalm. She was like the holy well at St. Wenna's,
which ran with a clear but small stream, while now and then
came a great rush of bright water, bubbling up through the
white pebbles and showing for a moment the crystal depth
below. I had always loved her from the first of our
acquaintance, but from that hour began a friendship which
will never end.
"I will bring you some cool water from the well in the
court," said she, and taking a jug, she was gone before I
could object. When she came back she looked startled.
"The evil spirit has gone out—is it not so?" said she,
looking into my face with a smile.
"Yes, maman, I hope so," I answered. "I am very sorry
about the book, and I will try to forgive Betty."
"There was but one thing to do, and that was to come
and tell me all about it," said my mother. "That would have
saved all the trouble."
"Yes, but who can ever believe her? I know I shall never
trust her again. When I have found any one out once, there
is the end of it with me."
CHAPTER XIV.
A WEDDING.
The next day was mine at the school, but I did not go
thither, being resolved, after all I had heard, never to set
foot therein till Margaret came and asked me. With the help